Search This Blog

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

VR-enabled treadmill developer Virtuix Holdings files for direct listing on Nasdaq

 Virtuix Holdings, which develops treadmills for VR/AR gaming and fitness purposes, filed on Tuesday to register its shares with the SEC and complete a direct listing on the Nasdaq. The shares of common stock listed will be sold by existing shareholders; Virtuix Holdings will not raise new capital in its listing. The company did not disclose a reference price or anticipated timing of its listing.


For the year ended March 31, 2025, the company disclosed a volume-weighted average share price of approximately $5.41. If the company listed its shares at that price, it would command a market cap of $209 million.

Virtuix specializes in omni-directional treadmills for virtual reality applications, offering products like Omni One, Omni Arena, Omni Care, Omniverse, and Omni Pro across consumer, enterprise, and defense markets. It has shipped over 4,000 Omni Pro units to more than 45 countries, installed 80 Omni Arena systems in US entertainment centers with a player base of over 500,000, and delivered 1,800 Omni One units since its launch in September 2024. Additionally, Virtuix operates a production facility in Zhuhai, China.

The Austin, TX-based company was founded in 2013 and booked $5 million in revenue for the 12 months ended September 30, 2025. It plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol VTIX. Virtuix Holdings filed confidentially on August 11, 2025. As a direct listing without a firm commitment offering, there are no underwriters on the deal; instead, Maxim Group LLC will serve as a financial advisor.

'Obama's Trojan Horse: How His Refugee Machine Engineered Billion-Dollar Looting Of US Treasury'

 by X user Saggezza Etern,

Obama’s Billion-Dollar Minnesota Fraud Empire

The Heist You Paid For

Imagine waking up tomorrow to find your bank account empty. Every dollar you saved for your children’s tuition, your retirement, your security—gone. Now imagine looking out the window and seeing the thief driving a Porsche bought with your money, laughing as he waves a government-issued thank you note. This is not a hypothetical scenario. It is the reality of the American taxpayer in the wake of the single largest COVID-era fraud scheme in the nation’s history. While you were locked down, masked up, and worrying about the price of eggs, a sophisticated network of fraudsters in Minnesota was siphoning off a quarter of a billion dollars—likely far more—from programs meant to feed hungry children.

The "Feeding Our Future" scandal is not just a story about greed. It is the smoking gun of a much darker political operation. Federal prosecutors have charged 70 people in a $250 million conspiracy, and the FBI is reportedly eyeing fraud that could total over $2 billion across multiple sectors including autism therapy, housing, and daycare. The vast majority of these defendants come from the Somali community in Minnesota. But do not be distracted by the foot soldiers. To understand how a fraud of this magnitude happens, you have to look past the people cashing the checks and look at the architect who built the bank. This industrial-scale theft traces directly back to Barack Obama. It was his administration that deliberately flooded Minnesota with tens of thousands of refugees, creating a dependent, insular enclave primed for exploitation. It was his policy of "equity" that paralyzed oversight. And it is his political heirs who are now frantically trying to bury the evidence.

The Architect of the Enclave

You might be wondering how Minnesota, a state once known for Scandinavian stoicism and lakes, became the global epicenter for Somali diasporic fraud. It was not an accident. It was a federal mandate. Between 2008 and 2016, the Obama administration oversaw the admission of over 54,000 Somali refugees into the United States. But they didn't just scatter them across the 50 states. They targeted specific swing states and counties, with Minnesota being the primary dumping ground.

By the time Obama left office, Minnesota was home to the largest Somali population in the country, now estimated at over 80,000 people. This concentration was strategic. By clustering refugees in Minneapolis, the Democratic machine created a voting bloc that could be harvested for elections and a demographic that demanded massive government outlays. They called it "diversity." In reality, it was demographic engineering. The Obama administration poured federal grants into "refugee services," creating a lucrative industry of nonprofits and community organizers whose entire existence depended on keeping the flow of refugees—and federal dollars—moving. This established the infrastructure for the fraud we see today. When you import a population from a failed state with no tradition of Western civic duty, and you teach them that the government is a bottomless trough of free money, you don't get assimilation. You get predation.

The "Equity" Shield: How They Paralyzed the Police

The genius of the Obama-era strategy was not just in the importation of people, but in the weaponization of race to silence dissent. Under the guise of "equity," the Obama administration pushed for relaxed standards in federal contracting, specifically favoring "minority-owned" nonprofits. This created a regulatory environment where asking questions became a career-ending risk.

Consider the mechanics of the "Feeding Our Future" fraud. The fraudsters claimed to be serving thousands of meals a day to children who did not exist. At one site, they claimed to be feeding 2,000 children daily in a second-story apartment. Anyone with eyes could see this was impossible. So why didn't the Minnesota Department of Education stop it? Because when they tried, they were called racists. The fraudsters, emboldened by the racial grievance culture Obama cultivated, sued the state for discrimination. Terrified of the "racism" label, the state resumed payments. This is the direct result of a decade of Obama-era policy that equated oversight with oppression. The bureaucrats were more afraid of a lawsuit from the ACLU than they were of letting billions of dollars in taxpayer money walk out the back door.

The Protege: Ilhan Omar and the MEALS Act

If Barack Obama built the machine, Ilhan Omar is the operator. Omar is the ultimate product of the Minnesota Somali enclave. She rose to power not despite her radicalism, but because of the demographic reality Obama created. And her legislative fingerprints are all over this scandal.

In 2020, as the pandemic began, Omar sponsored the MEALS Act. This legislation fundamentally altered the rules for federal nutrition programs, allowing parents to pick up meals without children present and removing the requirement for congregate dining. While pitched as a compassionate measure, it effectively removed the only verification mechanism the government had. It was a blank check. It is no coincidence that the fraud exploded immediately after these rules were relaxed. Omar’s campaign has accepted thousands of dollars from individuals later indicted in the scheme, money she quietly returned only after the media glare became too bright. She defends the lax rules as necessary to "feed kids," twisting the narrative to make you feel guilty for questioning the theft. But the money didn't go to kids. It went to luxury condos in Nairobi, beachfront property in Turkey, and Porsches in Minneapolis.

The Deep State Money Laundry

The rabbit hole goes deeper than just meal tickets. The connections between the Somali fraud network and the highest levels of the Democratic establishment are becoming impossible to ignore. Take a look at Rose Lake Capital, a venture capital firm founded by Tim Mynett, Ilhan Omar's husband. As the fraud investigations heated up, astute observers noticed that the firm's website was scrubbed of some very interesting names.

Prior to the scrub, the firm listed advisors including a former Obama ambassador to Bahrain, a former Obama ambassador to China, and a former DNC treasurer. Why are top-tier Obama officials swimming in the same financial waters as the family of a Congresswoman whose district is ground zero for the largest fraud in history? These networks provide the cover. They provide the legitimacy. And they potentially provide the mechanism to wash the proceeds of the grift. This is not just local corruption. It is a federally integrated operation where the political elite protect the foot soldiers who deliver the votes and the cash.

The Cost of Submission

You are paying for this. Every time you look at your pay stub and see the massive chunk taken out for federal taxes, remember that money is not building roads. It is not securing the border. It is funding the lifestyle of people who hate you. The $250 million stolen in the Feeding Our Future scam is just the tip of the iceberg. Investigators believe the total theft across childcare, autism, and housing programs could reach billions.

But the financial cost pales in comparison to the security threat. Much of this stolen money was remitted overseas. We know it bought real estate in Kenya and Turkey. What we don't know is how much of it ended up in the hands of Al-Shabaab or other extremist groups in the Horn of Africa. By turning a blind eye to this fraud to preserve "community relations," the Democrats have effectively turned the US Treasury into a piggy bank for foreign interests. And politically, they have succeeded. The Somali bloc in Minnesota votes over 80% Democrat. They have sent Ilhan Omar to Congress three times. They are a captured constituency, bought and paid for with your tax dollars.

Dismantling the Legacy

The Minnesota fraud scandal is the inevitable result of the Obama doctrine: Import a dependent class, dismantle the safeguards against corruption under the banner of "equity," and brand anyone who notices as a bigot. They counted on your silence. They counted on your fear of being called a name.

But the receipts are in. We know who did this. We know how they did it. And we know who let it happen. The solution is not "reform." It is a complete dismantling of the refugee resettlement pipeline that Obama built. We need a forensic audit of every federal dollar sent to "community non-profits" in the last ten years. We need to seize the assets—the cars, the houses, the overseas accounts—of everyone involved. And most importantly, we need to stop being afraid. The cry of "racism" is the thief's final defense. Ignore it. Keep your eyes on the money. Keep your eyes on the truth. They stole your country and sold it back to you as "diversity." Demand a refund.

What You Can Do Right Now:

  • Share this article: The mainstream media is trying to bury the Obama connection. Force the conversation.

  • Demand Audits: Contact your state representatives and demand a specialized audit of all Department of Education and DHS grant recipients in your state.

  • Reject the Guilt: When they try to shame you for asking where the money went, laugh in their faces. You are the creditor. They are the debtors. And collection day is coming.

Notable healthcare policies taking effect in 2026

 A wave of federal and state healthcare policies is set to take effect in 2026, bringing major changes to hospital operations, reimbursement, insurance markets and patient access. 

From the expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies to CMS’ expansion of site-neutral payments, tightened prior authorization rules and the first round of Medicare drug negotiations, 2026 will test how well the healthcare sector adapts to a fast-shifting regulatory landscape under the Trump administration. 

Simultaneously, state governments are rolling out new mandates — from insulin copay caps and AI guardrails to expanded coverage requirements and immigrant protections — that will have a notable effect on hospitals, payers and patients in certain markets. 

Affordable Care Act

Enhanced subsidies expire: Enhanced premium tax credits expired Dec. 31, leaving millions of marketplace enrollees facing higher premiums in 2026. The enhanced subsidies, introduced under the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act, increased subsidy amounts and expanded eligibility to households earning more than 400% of the federal poverty level, capping benchmark plan premiums at 8.5% of income. Since taking effect, the credits helped grow ACA marketplace enrollment to 24.3 million in 2025.

Congressional efforts to extend the subsidies stalled, with neither a Democratic three-year extension proposal nor a Republican alternative focused on health savings accounts passing the Senate. A House vote could still happen in early January. About 4.8 million people will lose coverage without an extension, according to the Urban Institute. Insurers have implemented the highest rate increases since 2018.

The ripple effects will extend across the healthcare industry as hospitals face a rise in uncompensated care and insurers lose membership. Total economic output could decrease by $57 billion and overall employment could decline by 286,000 jobs nationwide, including 130,000 healthcare positions, according to the Commonwealth Fund. Texas, Florida and Georgia face the steepest losses.

A handful of states have taken action to mitigate the impact, though none can fully replace federal funding long-term. New Mexico is the only state fully replacing the expired subsidies for 2026. California, Maryland, Connecticut and Colorado have committed partial funding, while Arkansas, Texas and Wyoming implemented “premium alignment” to stretch remaining federal subsidies further.

CMS finalizes 2026 rules: CMS issued the Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters final rule for 2026, establishing standards for insurers offering health plans through federal marketplaces and state-based exchanges on the federal platform. The rule, effective Jan. 15, 2025, applies to plan year 2026.

Among the most significant changes, CMS strengthened its authority to pursue enforcement actions against brokers and agents engaged in unauthorized enrollment activity, including the ability to take action against “lead agents” at agencies where misconduct occurs. The agency also expanded its authority to immediately suspend a broker’s ability to transact with the marketplace when it identifies circumstances posing an unacceptable risk to consumers or marketplace operations.

On the financial side, the rule increases user fees following the expiration of the enhanced premium tax credits. The FFM user fee will rise from 1.5% to 2.5% of monthly premiums, while the SBM-FP fee will increase from 1.2% to 2.0%.

Additional provisions refine the risk adjustment program by phasing out the market pricing adjustment for hepatitis C drugs and adding a new cost factor for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis medications. The rule also codifies long-standing CSR loading practices, updates standardized plan options with meaningful differentiation requirements, and expands CMS oversight of essential community provider network standards.

One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Medicaid expansion incentive ends: States that newly adopt Medicaid expansion will no longer receive the temporary FMAP boost (the two-year, 5-percentage-point increase).

Premium tax credits restricted for certain immigrants: Lawfully present noncitizens with incomes below 100% of the federal poverty line who are ineligible for Medicaid due to immigration status will no longer qualify for marketplace subsidies. CBO estimates about 300,000 people will lose coverage.

Premium tax credit repayment caps removed: Enrollees who receive excess advance premium tax credits will now have to repay the full amount, regardless of income. Previously, repayment caps applied to households under 400% FPL.

Income-based special enrollment periods eliminated: People can no longer enroll outside open enrollment based solely on income changes.

HSA eligibility expanded: Bronze and catastrophic ACA marketplace plans now qualify as HSA-eligible high deductible health plans. Direct primary care memberships can be paid with HSA funds.

Dependent care FSA limit increased: From $5,000 to $7,500 per household (if employer adopts the change).

Medicare Payment Updates

Site-neutral payment expansions and new price transparency rules: Several key hospital policies finalized by CMS will take effect Jan. 1, as part of the agency’s 2026 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule. Among the most notable changes, CMS will raise hospital outpatient payment rates by 2.6% for hospitals that meet quality reporting requirements. The update includes a 3.3% market basket increase, offset by a 0.7 percentage-point productivity cut.

CMS is also phasing out its inpatient-only list over a three-year period and expanding the list of procedures covered in ambulatory surgical centers. In 2026, 285 mostly musculoskeletal procedures will be removed from the inpatient-only list, while 289 procedures will be added to the ASC covered list. The change will mark a dramatic acceleration of surgical care to outpatient settings.

At the same time, CMS will begin aligning payment rates for select outpatient services delivered in hospital outpatient departments and off-campus sites to reduce patient cost-sharing tied to care location.

Hospitals will also face new price transparency requirements in 2026. Starting Jan. 1, they must post actual, consumer-friendly prices — rather than just estimates — in standardized formats. New machine-readable file requirements include disclosing the median, 10th percentile and 90th percentile of allowed amounts, as well as naming an executive responsible for data accuracy. Enforcement of some pricing elements will be delayed until April 1.

Medicare physician payment updates: For 2026, CMS finalized a 2.5% one-time increase to the Medicare physician fee schedule conversion factor, as required under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Combined with other technical adjustments, this brings the conversion factor to $33.57 for clinicians participating in advanced alternative payment models and $33.40 for non-participating providers. CMS also finalized a negative 2.5% “efficiency adjustment” that reduces payment for non-time-based services expected to gain efficiency over time, sparing time-based services such as evaluation and management, care management and behavioral health.

Healthcare organizations and physician groups have raised concerns that the efficiency adjustment could unfairly reduce payments for specialties such as radiology, oncology and surgery, without sufficient empirical support. The American Medical Association and other groups welcomed the one-time pay boost, though warned it doesn’t offset long-term financial pressures on private practices. The American Medical Group Association urged CMS and Congress to pursue more sustainable, inflation-sensitive reforms to the physician payment system.

CMS’ TEAM model: CMS will begin implementing the Transforming Episode Accountability Model Jan. 1. More than 700 hospitals will participate in the model, which will hold them responsible for care quality and costs associated with five surgical procedures for 30 days after discharge. The five procedures included in the model are: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; lower extremity joint replacement; major bowel procedure; surgical hip and/or femur fracture; and spinal fusion.

Hospitals will continue to bill Medicare as usual during the performance year. CMS will then reconcile actual spending against a set target price and either issue a payment to hospitals that comes in under target or requires repayment from those that exceed it. The model will test whether episode-based payments can improve care quality while reducing Medicare expenditures, according to CMS.

To prepare, many participating hospitals are working to strengthen partnerships with post-acute care providers and develop standardized care pathways to eliminate unnecessary variation in care. 

Medicare laboratory testing cuts: CMS plans to implement up to 15% reductions to Medicare payments for about 800 clinical laboratory tests, effective Jan. 31. The update stems from a 2014 law that requires Medicare to base payment rate updates in the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule on private payer data reported by laboratories.

The American Clinical Laboratory Association is lobbying Congress to pass the Reforming and Enhancing Sustainable Updates to Laboratory Testing Services Act, which would overhaul how Medicare sets payment rates for lab tests. ACLA — a national trade association representing clinical laboratories — includes members such as Labcorp, Quest Diagnostics and Mayo Clinic Laboratories.

CMS obstetric care standards take effect: Beginning Jan. 1,  hospitals and critical access hospitals that offer obstetrical services must comply with new Medicare conditions of participation intended to standardize and improve maternal care. Under the updated CMS rule, obstetrical services must be well organized and delivered in line with nationally recognized standards for both physical and behavioral health needs of pregnant, birthing and postpartum patients. If outpatient obstetrical care is offered, its quality must be consistent with inpatient care and tailored to the scope and complexity of services provided.

CMS outlined new requirements for how obstetrical services are staffed and delivered. Labor and delivery areas must be supervised by a qualified professional, such as a registered nurse, certified nurse midwife, nurse practitioner, physician assistant or physician. Obstetrical privileges must be clearly defined for all practitioners based on competency. Facilities must also maintain key equipment on-site — including a call-in system, cardiac monitor and fetal monitor — and have protocols and supplies in place for managing obstetrical emergencies and complications, in accordance with national guidelines and internal quality improvement programs. The final phase of the rule takes effect Jan. 1, 2027, and focuses on staff training.

Medicare Drug Pricing Updates

340B rebate pilot paused amid legal challenge: A major overhaul of the 340B program was set to take effect Jan. 1, though its implementation is on pause following a federal judge’s recent ruling.

The Health Resources and Services Administration initially shared plans for a new pilot model in July. Under the proposal, drugmakers participating in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program would have the option to replace the program’s longstanding upfront discount structure with a rebate-based approach. Covered entities would purchase drugs at full price and seek post-sale rebates to reach 340B ceiling prices. HRSA said the pilot would initially be limited to 10 drugs selected for price negotiations, with the option to include additional drugs after the first year. 

The American Hospital Association, the Maine Hospital Association and four safety-net hospitals challenged the model in court, arguing it was finalized without appropriate notice-and-comment rulemaking. On Dec. 18, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker granted a temporary restraining order halting the pilot’s implementation while the case proceeds.

Hospital groups have been urging HHS to abandon the pilot for months, warning it would shift significant financial and administrative risk onto safety-net providers already experiencing significant financial strain. The AHA has warned the change could leave hospitals with “hundreds of millions” in annual costs.

HHS has also faced pressure from lawmakers surrounding the pilot. In September, a group of 162 bipartisan members of Congress sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  warning the model could drive up costs for safety-net providers.

Medicare Part D negotiated prices: Beginning Jan. 1 Medicare will implement its first round of negotiated drug prices under the Inflation Reduction Act, marking a shift in how the federal government pays for prescription drugs. The initial round of Part D price negotiations applies to 10 high-cost, high-use drugs. CMS projects that this will save $1.5 billion in annual out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries while saving the program $6 billion per year. 

The 10 Part D drugs selected for 2026 are Eliquis, Jardiance, Xarelto, Januvia, Farxiga, Entresto, Enbrel, Imbruvica, Stelara and NovoLog/Fiasp. The drugs treat conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, cancer, blood clots and autoimmune diseases.

Changes to Part D out-of-pocket threshold: Beginning Jan. 1 Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part D will see a $2,100 annual cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs. This cap applies to deductibles, coinsurance and copays, and once a beneficiary hits the threshold, they will owe no further cost-sharing for covered drugs for the rest of the year. The $2,100 cap follows the program’s initial $2,000 limit set for 2025 and is subject to annual adjustments based on drug spending trends.

Medicare Advantage

CMS tightens Medicare Advantage prior authorization rules: Starting Jan. 1 CMS will enact Medicare Advantage and Part D policy changes under the 2026 final rule to help strengthen prior authorization protections, improve transparency and clarify appeals and coverage determinations. Medicare Advantage plans will be restricted from reopening previously approved inpatient hospital admissions under the rule, except in cases of clear error or fraud, which will require plans to honor prior authorization decisions once granted.

CMS will also close Medicare Advantage appeals loopholes through clarifying that organization determinations include coverage decisions made before, during or after services are rendered, making sure that beneficiaries retain full appeal rights. Plans will be required to inform enrollees and providers of coverage decisions when providers submit requests on a patient’s behalf, and enrollee liability for services cannot be determined until a plan makes a payment decision on a provider’s claim.

Added policies effective in 2026 feature new guardrails on special supplemental benefits for chronically ill patients, codifying a list of non-allowable benefits and technical updates to risk adjustment data submission requirements for Medicare Advantage, cost plans and PACE organizations. 

Prior Authorization

CMS final rule tightens prior authorization decision deadlines: Starting in 2026, CMS will implement key provisions of the Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule to help modernize prior authorization and reduce administrative burden. Impacted payers, including Medicare Advantage organizations, Medicaid and CHIP programs, Medicaid managed care plans and CHIP managed care entities, must issue prior authorization decisions within 72 hours for expedited requests and seven calendar days for standard requests, significantly shortening current timelines.

Payers will need to provide specific reasons for prior authorization denials and report prior authorization metrics publicly, increasing accountability and transparency. Beginning Jan. 1, 2027, the rule will also require impacted payers to implement an HL7 FHIR-based Prior Authorization API to support electronic, end-to-end prior authorization to streamline workflows, reduce manual processes and minimize delays in patient care.

CMS to launch WISeR model: CMS will kick off its Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model on Jan. 1, a six-year Innovation Center initiative designed to cut back on medically unnecessary care in traditional Medicare and protect federal spending. The pilot will take place in New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington state. The voluntary model will run through Dec. 31, 2031, and will test if enhanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and machine learning, can streamline prior authorization and medical review for certain items and services that are vulnerable to fraud, waste, abuse or inappropriate use.

Participating companies with expertise in prior authorization will run in assigned states and support medical reviewers in assessing specific outpatient services with current Medicare coverage criteria, like skin and tissue substitutes, electrical nerve stimulators and knee arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis under the model. Inpatient-only services, emergency services and services that could result in significant risk if delayed are excluded. All non-payment determinations will be made by appropriately licensed clinicians who use standardized, transparent and evidence-based processes.

The WISeR Model does not change Medicare coverage or payment policies. It applies to only traditional Medicare, not Medicare Advantage. Providers and suppliers in certain regions can choose to submit prior authorization requests for included services or move forward with pre-payment medical review. Model participants will be paid based on their ability to cut unnecessary or non-covered services, with performance tracked across process quality, provider and beneficiary experience and clinical quality outcomes.

Notable state measures taking effect in 2026

Arkansas

Judge blocks PBM pharmacy ownership ban: In April, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed the nation’s first law to ban pharmacy benefit managers from owning or operating pharmacies in the state. The law was originally set to take effect Jan. 1, but a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction in July, blocking the law’s enforcement as court proceedings continue. CVS Caremark and Cigna’s Express Scripts — two of the nation’s largest PBMs — had sued Arkansas over the law. CVS previously said the new restrictions would force it to close 23 of its retail pharmacies in the state. 

California

Capping insulin copayments at $35 per month: California became the 29th state to cap insulin copayments at $35 for a 30-day supply under private state-regulated health plans, following Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signing of Senate Bill 40. The law will require large group insurers to implement the cap, starting Jan. 1, while individual or small group insurers need to comply by Jan. 1, 2027, ensuring at least one insulin option per drug type is included on prescription formularies. The legislation tackles an affordability issue for California’s around 3.5 million adults with diabetes, with many forced to ration their lifesaving medication due to cost.

Restricting pharmacy benefit manager practices: California will prohibit PBMs from using spread pricing, effective Jan. 1 charging plans more for drugs than PBMs pay pharmacies, and any spread-pricing authorizations in contracts become void by Jan. 1, 2029. The law requires PBMs to use a passthrough pricing model and generally limits PBM compensation to flat management fees and not tied to drug prices. PBMs may not discriminate against nonaffiliated pharmacies or require patients to only use affiliated pharmacies when nonaffiliated options are in-network. Patient cost-sharing will be capped at no more than the actual rate paid by the plan or insurer for prescription drugs, with limited exceptions.

Enacting AI chatbot safety law: On Jan. 1, California will regulate “companion” AI chatbots under Senate Bill 243, signed by Mr. Newsom. The law applies to emotionally responsive, human-like chatbots designed to meet users’ social needs. It requires clear disclosures that users are interacting with artificial intelligence, with additional protections for minors, including recurring break reminders and limits on sexually explicit content involving minors. Operators must maintain and publish protocols to prevent suicide and self-harm content and provide crisis referrals when users express suicidal ideation. Beginning July 1, 2027, operators must submit annual reports to the Office of Suicide Prevention on suicide-related safety measures. The law allows any person who suffers injury in fact from noncompliance to bring a civil action.

AI tools barred from implying licensed human healthcare services: On Jan. 1,  Assembly Bill 489 will extend California’s existing prohibitions on misleading use of licensed healthcare titles so they can be enforced against developers and deployers of artificial intelligence and generative AI systems that use those titles in their advertising or functionality. The law prohibits AI tools from using titles, terms or phrases that falsely suggest healthcare advice, care, reports or assessments are being provided by a licensed human health professional. Violations are enforceable by the appropriate healthcare licensing boards, with each improper use treated as a separate offense.

Connecticut

Insurers must cover biomarker testing: Starting Jan. 1, individual and group health insurance plans will be required to cover biomarker tests for diagnosing, treating, or monitoring conditions such as cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Gov. Ned Lamont signed the legislation in June, aiming to expand residents’ access to early detection tools. The law builds on a 2024 policy that only applied to Medicaid enrollees. The mandate requires coverage through in-network labs if the test is supported by clinical evidence. 

District of Columbia

Tightened Medicaid eligibility: D.C.’s fiscal year 2026 budget tightens Medicaid income eligibility requirements for childless adults and adult caregivers. Residents who no longer qualify will be transitioned to a D.C.-administered Basic Health Plan, which does not cover some Medicaid benefits such as adult dental and vision services.

Ambulance fee cap increase: D.C. is increasing ambulance transport fees, with costs primarily falling on insurers rather than patients. The fee for patients on life support rises from $1,750 to $2,000, while ground transport mileage rates increase from $26.25 to $30 per loaded mile. Insurance covers ambulance bills in most cases, with the fees helping to offset taxes that fund EMS services.

Illinois

Menopause therapy coverage mandate: Most state-regulated health plans will be required to cover medically necessary hormonal and non-hormonal therapies for menopausal symptoms. The mandate applies to plans issued, amended, delivered or renewed on or after Jan. 1, 2026. Coverage must align with evidence-based recommendations and clinical guidance supporting the therapy.

Hospital “sensitive locations” immigrant protections implementation deadline: General acute care hospitals must implement policies guiding interactions with immigration and law enforcement agents. The requirement stems from a state law aimed at designating hospitals as “sensitive locations” to protect immigrant patients. Hospitals must ensure staff understand and follow procedures that safeguard patient rights during such encounters. Hospitals would be fined $500 per day for noncompliance if they fail to meet the deadlines for developing their policies during the first quarter of 2026.

Florida

Refund of patient overpayments: Healthcare providers will be required to refund patient overpayments within 30 days of identifying that an overpayment occurred. The law aims to streamline billing practices and ensure timely reimbursements to patients. Providers must have processes in place to accurately identify and process overpayments. Failure to comply with the 30-day window could result in regulatory penalties or patient complaints.

Maryland

No prior auth required for pediatric transfers: A new law will take effect prohibiting insurers, Medicaid managed care organizations and the Maryland Children’s Health Program from requiring prior authorization for transfers to “special pediatric hospitals.” These facilities provide nonacute medical, rehabilitation, therapy and palliative care to individuals under age 22 or up to age 23 if they have co-occurring physical and behavioral health conditions. The law aims to reduce delays in medically necessary transfers for children with complex needs. 

No anesthesia time limits: A new law prohibits insurers from imposing time limits on anesthesia coverage when a medical professional recommends it. If an insurer agrees to cover anesthesia, coverage must extend for the entire procedure. The law applies to the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, managed care organizations, nonprofit health plans and health maintenance organizations.

New York

Essential plan coverage restrictions: Approximately 450,000 lawfully present immigrants enrolled in New York’s Essential Plan will lose coverage starting in July 2026 due to eligibility restrictions under OBBBA. The Essential Plan currently serves 1.6 million residents.

Virginia

Expanded cancer screening coverage requirements: Two new laws expand insurance coverage for cancer screenings. Under HB 1828, insurers must cover diagnostic and follow-up breast examinations, including mammograms, MRIs and ultrasounds, at no cost to patients. SB 1314 requires coverage for updated prostate cancer screening tests for men over 50, as well as high-risk men starting at age 40.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/notable-healthcare-policies-taking-effect-in-2026/

Jihad on Times Square

 by Kim Ezra Shienbaum

There are few places on earth more symbolically American -- or more globally recognizable -- than New York City’s Times Square. It is a commercial crossroads, a cultural billboard, and increasingly, a battleground for ideological messaging.

That’s why many New Yorkers and visitors were understandably bewildered -- if not outright angered -- by a massive green digital display dominating Times Square just before Christmas proclaiming: 

JESUS WAS PALESTINIAN. 

The color choice was no accident. Green is the traditional color of Islam, and the message itself was plainly political. Online reactions quickly labeled the display “divisive,” “inflammatory,” and “inappropriate.”

Yet the response was not universally negative. Some commentators praised the message as “thought-provoking,” a “bridge-building effort,” or even the beginning of a “national conversation” meant to emphasize that “Jesus is for everyone.”

The billboard’s sponsor, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), explained that its intent was to highlight supposed deep historical ties between Christianity and Islam. But intentions do not nullify consequences. Nor do slogans override history.

In light of the recent National Security Strategy’s warning about “civilizational erasure” in Europe, Americans would be wise to ask whether similar revisionism is now being imported -- quite literally -- into the heart of our most iconic public spaces. Are we witnessing the quiet imposition of a new religious and historical narrative, one that fundamentally alters Christianity’s foundational claims?

Two assertions embedded in the Times Square message demand direct rebuttal, because both distort history and theology in ways that are anything but benign. No, Jesus was not Palestinian. And no, the Christian-Muslim historical relationship has not been one of mutual partnership, but of subjugation, even conquest.

Jesus Was Not Palestinian

Using Scripture as our primary guide -- as Christians have done for two millennia -- the claim collapses immediately. Jesus’ birth and death occurred long before the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 A.D.), after which the Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed Judea Syria Palaestina as an act of punishment against the Jewish population. The term “Palestinian” did not exist in Jesus’ lifetime. It was later resurrected by the British during the Mandate period following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I. To retroactively assign a modern political identity to a first-century Jew is not merely anachronistic -- it is historically dishonest.

The Bible, reinforced by centuries of Christian tradition and even European art -- from Giotto to Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper -- confirms that Jesus lived and died as a Jew. His burial followed Jewish law: wrapped in a shroud and interred swiftly after death. Archaeology further corroborates the biblical record. Bethlehem, Nazareth, the Sea of Galilee, the River Jordan, Jerusalem’s Temple Wall, and the Church of the Holy Sepulcher all stand as tangible reminders of the Jewish and Christian roots of the land.

Later efforts by medieval Crusaders -- however flawed or ultimately unsuccessful -- underscore a basic historical reality: Christians understood the region as their spiritual inheritance long before Islam emerged in the seventh century.

Christians Under Islam Were Dhimmis, Not Allies

The second claim -- that Christianity and Islam share a long history of harmonious cooperation -- is equally misleading.

Under Islamic rule, Christians were classified as dhimmis: protected yet subordinate peoples. They paid the jizya tax for the right to practice their faith, were barred from public office, restricted in worship, and frequently subjected to social and legal humiliation. While periods of relative tolerance existed, equality did not. Cooperation was not the norm; subordination was.

This status is not merely a medieval relic. In many parts of the Islamic world today, Christian communities continue to shrink under Islamist pressure -- through discrimination, forced conversion, church destruction, and violence. The historical record is not one of shared stewardship but of enduring imbalance.

Conquest, Not “Shared Roots”

Beyond the subordinate status imposed on Christians in Muslim lands lies an even more inconvenient reality: the long and often brutal history of Islamic conquest of Christian civilization itself -- an irony rarely acknowledged amid today’s violent street protests condemning Israeli “settler colonialism.”

Islamic expansion into Christian Europe began in 711 A.D. with the Moorish invasion of the Iberian Peninsula, initiating an occupation that lasted more than seven centuries until its defeat in 1492. Far from a romanticized era of coexistence, Muslim rule imposed religious hierarchy, curtailed Christian autonomy, and periodically enforced conversion.

The pattern continued eastward. In 1453, the Ottoman Turks conquered Byzantium, extinguishing the Eastern Roman Empire and transforming Constantinople -- Christendom’s great eastern capital -- into Istanbul. Ottoman armies pushed deep into Europe, waging wars against the Habsburgs and advancing to the gates of Vienna before being halted in 1683.

Islamic conquest did not stop at Europe’s borders. Muslim empires expanded through Central Asia into the Indian subcontinent under the Mughal Empire, where non-Muslims were likewise reduced to second-class status.

This is the historical record conspicuously absent from modern narratives that weaponize the language of colonialism while ignoring centuries of Islamic expansion across Christian lands.

A Christmas Message That Wasn’t

The Times Square display was not an innocent holiday reflection. It was an act of historical revisionism wrapped in the language of inclusivity and projected onto one of America’s most visible public stages.

When religious history is reshaped to serve contemporary political narratives, something more than dialogue is at stake. What is being erased is not merely nuance, but truth -- truth about Christianity’s origins, about Jewish history, and about the real nature of Christian life under Islamic rule.

Civilizational erasure does not always arrive with violence. Sometimes it comes softly, glowing in green, asking Americans to question what they have always known -- just in time for Christmas.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/jihad_on_times_square.html

The Somali money transmitter pipeline

 



An often-overlooked aspect of racketeering involves Hawala dealers, a money-transfer system that allows Somalis to send funds locally and internationally. Alternative media outlets have spotlighted the Somalia money laundering, tax evasion, and financing of illicit activities that mainstream news sources have ignored. Their investigations reveal elaborate scams within Minnesota's Somali community, spanning child nutrition, autism therapy, housing stabilization, and child-care programs, and exposing the loss of billions in taxpayer dollars.


An often-overlooked aspect of racketeering involves Hawala dealers, a money-transfer system that allows Somalis to send funds locally and internationally. These dealers also offer money orders, debit card issuance, and check cashing, providing anonymity and requiring minimal documentation. Such money transmitters create opportunities for fraud and money laundering.

When the first indictments were announced in 2022 for the Somali Feed Our Future nonprofit, I thoroughly analyzed the audited financial statements and 990 tax returns. After studying material for irregularities, I filed a complaint with the Minnesota Accountancy Board against Charles Amevo (unindicted co-conspirator) for multiple violations of the AICPA professional and audit standards. The complaint also mentioned that Amevo had failed to conduct a required Single Audit of the federal grants.

After the convictions were announced last June, the Minnesota Accountancy Board issued its decision regarding my complaint against Amevo. Amevo lost his CPA license, was fined $20,000, and had to inform management that the audit results for his six other clients, Somali money transfer businesses, were no longer valid.

The six companies are registered with the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (NMLS). However, Section 7.02 requires money transmitters to maintain current audited financial statements. Since the audit opinions have been withdrawn, the six entities are now noncompliant and in violation of their surety bond requirements. Below is a summary of the six money transfer companies, including links to their NMLS registrations and websites. Note how they rebrand their businesses as a possible evasion tactic.

Money Transmitter

Prior Legal Name

NMLS ID

 

RASMI PAY LLC

TAAG Services US LLC

1273252

 

Ramad Pay Inc.

KAAG Express

1139908

 

HODAN Global Services

 

947779

 

Remit Choice Inc

HAMI Express Inc.

1626269

 

Banana Pay, LLC

 

1136319

 

Beeso Corp.

SafariPay Corp.

1838296

 

I submitted a noncompliance complaint to the Minnesota Commerce Department by email, providing a receipt and certified mail confirmation. The department has neither taken action nor issued a cease-and-desist order against the six money transmitters, despite the need for a thorough audit, a clean opinion, and proof of surety coverage. This inaction highlights broader concerns about state oversight, as seen during the welfare fraud scandals, where licensed transmitters were not scrutinized for potential money laundering.

The FBI Minnesota task force should prioritize investigations into Somali Money Transmitters to trace and recover stolen funds, prevent fraud and terrorism financing, and identify the broader racketeering network. The FBI should also consider establishing a national task force to address this issue nationwide.

Bob Bishop is a forensic investigator and retired CPA.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/12/the_somali_money_transmitter_pipeline.html

US Instructs Its Western-Nation Embassies To Report On Abuses Due To Mass Immigration

 by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

The Department of State has instructed U.S. embassies located in Western nations to report human rights abuses occurring there due to mass immigration, according to a Dec. 30 thread on X.

The embassies will “analyze government policies that facilitate mass migration or privilege migrants over citizens,” the department said.


The United States urges governments to protect their borders and defend their citizens against the human rights abuses caused by mass migration. The United States stands ready to work alongside nations across the Western Hemisphere to end the global crisis of mass migration.”

According to the United Nations’ International Migrant Stock report published in January 2025, the total number of international migrants worldwide in 2024 was 304 million.

Europe hosted 94 million of these individuals, which is “more international migrants than any other region” in the world, the report said.

In second place was North America, which hosted 61 million migrants, followed by Northern Africa and Western Asia with 54 million people.

Between 1990 and 2024, Europe saw the largest increase in international migrants, with 43 million foreigners flowing into the region. North America added 34 million people during this period.

In its X post, the State Department said the United States has seen millions of migrants and massive amounts of deadly drugs flowing into the country on transnational routes operated by terror groups.

“Mass migration has endangered American citizens, threatened the economic security of American workers, and strained America’s asylum system,” it said, adding that the “narco-terror organizations that facilitate mass migration routinely engage in child trafficking, forced labor, sexual assault, and other heinous human rights abuses that threaten the citizens of nations throughout the Western Hemisphere and undermine the rule of law.”

On Nov. 21, the State Department said in a thread on X that it had directed embassies to report on any human rights implications and public safety impacts of mass migration, calling it an “existential threat to Western civilization” that also undermines the stability of key American allies.

“In the United Kingdom, thousands of girls have been victimized in Rotherham, Oxford, and Newcastle by grooming gangs involving migrant men,” the department said. “Many girls were left to suffer unspeakable abuse for years before authorities stepped in.”

The department also noted rapes of teen girls in Sweden and Germany by migrants.

In the United States, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has arrested and deported “hundreds of thousands of criminal illegal aliens” under the Trump administration, including drug traffickers, rapists, gang members, and kidnappers, the department said in a Dec. 19 statement.

“Seventy percent of those arrested by ICE are criminal illegal aliens who have been charged or convicted of a crime in the U.S.,” DHS said, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has seized 39,984 pounds of drugs under President Donald Trump, a 10 percent jump from the same time in 2024, the department said, adding that Coast Guard seizures of illegal narcotics have surged 200 percent since January 2025.

Living on Benefits

As part of strengthening immigration practices, DHS issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on Nov. 19 to amend the Public Charge provision regarding the admission of immigrants into the country, triggering opposition from lawmakers.

Under the provision, authorities can deny the application of an immigrant applying for a visa, admission, or adjustment of legal status in the United States who is likely to primarily become dependent on government benefits.

On Dec. 19, more than 100 lawmakers sent a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Joseph B. Edlow, urging them to withdraw updates to Public Charge rules, saying it would harm immigrant communities, according to a Dec. 23 statement from the office of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.).

“The Trump Administration’s proposal would rescind the clear 2022 public charge regulations and replace them with vague, undefined standards, leading to arbitrary decision-making, fear, and widespread confusion,” they said.

“Past public charge expansions have driven families, including those with U.S. citizen children, away from lawful access to health care, nutrition, and early childhood programs.”

In its proposed rulemaking notice, DHS said that the regulations must be updated.

The existing rules are “inconsistent with congressional intent, unduly restrictive, and hamper DHS’s ability to make accurate, precise, and reliable determinations of whether certain aliens are likely at any time to become a public charge,” it said.

DHS wrote that rescinding these rules would restore “broader discretion to evaluate all pertinent facts and align with long-standing policy that aliens in the United States should be self-reliant and government benefits should not incentivize immigration.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-instructs-its-western-nation-embassies-report-abuses-due-mass-immigration