Search This Blog

Sunday, February 1, 2026

Explosion In AI Data Center Buildouts Will Demand Next-Gen Counter-Drone Security

 Despite trillions of dollars slated for global data center buildouts, power grid upgrades, and other artificial intelligence infrastructure expansion through the end of the decade, there remains very limited investor discussion about the next-generation physical security architecture required to defend these increasingly critical and high-value infrastructure nodes, including data centers, power plants, and grid transmission chokepoints.

Protection of data centers from suicide drone swarm attacks is currently assessed as a lower risk at the moment, while the Trump administration, particularly following last year's "Restoring American Airspace Sovereignty" executive order, is primarily focused on counter-UAS measures to secure stadiums and related venues against drone attacks ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

In recent weeks, U.S. military, federal agencies, and local authorities gathered for a two-day summit near U.S. Northern Command headquarters, bringing together federal agencies, 11 U.S. host committees, and FIFA's security heads to prepare for matches across the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

"We're never going to not worry about a dirty bomb," Miami-Dade County Sheriff Rosanna Cordero-Stutz, who participated in the planning session, told Politico. "But we also recognize that there's a lot of other things that we need to worry about as well."

"You can't just give counter-UAS mitigation equipment to law enforcement that hasn't learned how to use it yet," said White House FIFA World Cup Task Force Andrew Giuliani, who coordinated the federal government's role in tournament preparations and addressed the drone threat at the summit.

Trump's counter-UAS EO last June, combined with heightened drone-threat concerns ahead of FIFA World Cup events, underscores the urgent need for low-cost, rapidly deployable kinetic interceptor counter-UAS systems that could be repurposed to defend high-value infrastructure and critical assets beyond the soccer tournament.

Beyond the FIFA World Cup and back to the data center buildout story, Morgan Stanley's Vishwanath Tirupattur forecasts that nearly $3 trillion of global data center spend will occur through 2028, comprising $1.6 trillion on hardware (chips/servers) and $1.3 trillion on building data center infrastructure, including real estate, build costs, and maintenance.

Wall Street analysts largely end their analysis at the financing and construction of next-generation data centers, with limited discussion regarding the modern security architecture required once these facilities are built and become instant high-value targets for non-state actors or foreign adversaries; traditional perimeter measures such as metal chainlink fencing and standard surveillance systems are rendered useless in the world of emerging AI threats, including coordinated autonomous drone or swarm-based attacks enabled by advances in AI and low-cost unmanned systems.

The deployment of low-cost kinetic counter-UAS intercept systems from the US could soon become a reality in Ukraine and be field-tested on the front lines, where tons of operational data would be gathered to help developers refine these systems ahead of future deployment to protect stadiums, data centers, and other high-value assets from drone threats across North America.

Cameron Rowe founded counter-UAS intercept startup Sentradel, which builds autonomous turrets to detect, track, and destroy FPV (first-person view) drones that can be easily modified with explosives. The low-cost interceptor uses a rifle that fires low-cost 5.56 bullets at incoming FPVs, versus current systems that use missiles and may cost tens of thousands per interception, where the economics of war aren't there.

Meet Sentradel's low-cost kinetic interceptor counter-UAS system:

Watch 

There's growing interest from the Trump administration that these counter-UAS intercept systems will be guarding high-value assets, perhaps not stadiums immediately, but likely data centers in the future, especially as former Google CEO Eric Schmidt recently warned that attacks on data centers are only a matter of time. Readers can see the full story here.

https://www.zerohedge.com/military/explosion-ai-data-center-buildouts-will-demand-next-gen-counter-drone-security

Brussels Versus Washington

 by Cláudia Ascensão Nunes via the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE),

For years, Europe has tried to convince itself that it could regulate its way to technological greatness.

Instead of becoming a technological powerhouse, it produced rules, many rules, with effects now extending far beyond its own borders.

In 2026, those rules are colliding head on with an American president who refuses to accept that U.S. innovation could be governed from Brussels.

Two regulations sit at the center of this escalating tension. The Digital Markets Act, or DMA, applies to the world’s largest digital platforms, the so-called gatekeepers, and forces them to open their ecosystems, share data, and abandon business practices that are central to their models. 

The Digital Services Act, or DSA, regulates platform content and algorithms, requiring the removal of information deemed illegal or harmful, with all the subjectivity this entails.

This risks granting a supranational authority direct power over online speech by compelling platforms to remove content that fails to comply with regulatory guidelines.

These laws, which entered into force in 2022 for the DSA and 2024 for the DMA, appear designed with America’s largest technology firms in mind. Five of the six companies designated as DMA gatekeepers are U.S.-based, as are the overwhelming majority of platforms subject to the DSA.

This has placed companies such as Apple, Google, and Meta under constant supervision by Brussels, forcing them to modify products in order to operate in the European market, with consequences not only for firms themselves but also for consumers and innovation more broadly.

In 2025, under the DMA alone, Apple was fined 500 million euros and forced to open iOS to rival app stores and payment systems. Meta was fined 200 million euros and required to alter how it uses user data.

Under EU competition law, Google also received a historic 2.95 billion euro fine for alleged abuse of market dominance in the digital sector and was forced to redesign key aspects of its search engine and advertising business.

Upon taking office, Donald Trump identified this European interventionism as disguised tariffs that artificially raise costs for American firms and strip them of competitive advantages.

He threatened to invoke Section 301 of U.S. trade law, the same tool used against China, to retaliate, significantly intensifying tensions between Brussels and Washington.

In December 2025, that tension took on a face: X. The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s platform 120 million euros under the DSA, accusing it of failing to manage so-called systemic risks linked to the circulation of political information. For Musk, this amounted to an assault on free speech. The episode appears to have triggered a broader transatlantic diplomatic and commercial escalation. Washington responded by imposing visa bans on five European officials and experts associated with the DSA and threatened tariffs and restrictions against European firms such as SAP, Capgemini, and Mistral AI should Brussels fail to retreat.

The conflict has now spread beyond the European Union. The United Kingdom and Australia have begun discussing restrictions on X, citing risks related to misinformation and online safety, reinforcing the perception that Brussels is asserting itself as a global digital regulator.

Despite pressure from the Trump administration, the European Union shows no signs of slowing down. In 2026, another regulation enters fully into force, the AI Act, which appears once again tailored to American firms. It subjects artificial intelligence systems deemed high-risk, including AI used in hiring, credit, healthcare, public security, content moderation, and high impact generative tools, to mandatory risk assessments, human oversight, and constraints that exist in no other major market. These requirements will delay product launches, raise costs, and force companies to design technologies according to political criteria defined outside the United States.

As a result, 2026 is shaping up to be a particularly challenging year. From a geopolitical perspective, the most immediate risk is the erosion of the transatlantic relationship in a strategic sector. Technology today is an instrument of power, and this escalation among allies is likely to generate incompatible regulatory blocs, fragmenting the digital economy, weakening the West, and opening space for alternative models, particularly China’s state-controlled approach.

Consumers stand to lose most from this conflict, along two pillars central to any classical liberal order: first, the free market, as rising compliance costs will inevitably translate into higher prices; second, online free expression, increasingly constrained by incentives for excessive moderation and the preventive removal of lawful but controversial content.

At a moment when the world is rapidly advancing in artificial intelligence, automation, and the technologies that will define the next decade, the European Union is moving in the opposite direction, deepening an interventionism that exceeds the role a state should play.

The European Union must lower barriers, simplify rules, promote competition, and allow innovation to flourish without permanent political oversight.

In today’s world, as always, market liberalization is not a threat to consumers. It is their strongest protection and the true engine of progress.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/brussels-versus-washington

Saturday, January 31, 2026

US may make a deal on Cuba, Trump says

 US President Donald Trump said on Jan 31 that he believed the United States would “work a deal” on Cuba.

His comments came days after 

threatening tariffs

 on any country supplying Cuba with oil.

Mr Trump reiterated his call for 

Cuba to negotiate with the US

.

“It doesn’t have to be a humanitarian crisis,” Mr Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to Florida.

“I think they probably would come to us and want to make a deal... They have a situation that’s very bad for Cuba. They have no money. They have no oil. They lived off Venezuelan money and oil, and none of that’s coming now.”

In 2025, Venezuela was Cuba’s largest oil supplier, meeting roughly one-third of the island’s daily needs.



Supply from Venezuela dropped following the US blockade on shipments from there, even before the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro


Reuters exclusively reported in January that Mexico, Cuba’s top supplier after Venezuela cut off shipments in December, was reviewing whether to continue sending oil amid fears it could face retaliation from Washington


https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-may-make-a-deal-on-cuba-trump-says

South Korea Vows to Speed Up Investment Law Amid US Tariff Risks

 


South Korea will move swiftly to implement investment legislation sought by the US, Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan pledged after returning from talks in America that he said helped clear up misunderstandings over tariffs.

Kim told reporters at Incheon Airport late Saturday that discussions with US officials, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, had deepened mutual understanding and clarified that Seoul has no intention of delaying or failing to implement a previously agreed tariff deal with Washington.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-01/south-korea-vows-to-speed-up-investment-law-amid-us-tariff-risks

Venezuela Unveils Amnesty Bill For Mass Release Of Political Prisoners

 Venezuela's US-backed and CIA-installed interim president Delcy Rodriguez has unveiled a sweeping amnesty bill that could pave the way for the release of hundreds of detainees, in a first major political move since former President Nicolas Maduro and his wife were ousted and whisked off to New York earlier this month.

"We have decided to push ahead with a general amnesty law that covers the whole period of political violence from 1999 to the present day," Rodriguez announced Friday. She issued her address before a who's who of government figures, including judges and federal magistrates, that the National Assembly would take up the bill "with urgency". There are believed to currently be at least 700 inmates deemed political prisoners nationwide.

via Associated Press

"May this law serve to heal the wounds left by the political confrontation fueled by violence and extremism," Rodriguez said in the televised address.

"May it serve to redirect justice in our country, and may it serve to redirect coexistence among Venezuelans," she added.

Rodriguez has also declared the closure of El Helicoide, the notorious Caracas detention center run by the intelligence services, long accused by former inmates and independent rights groups of torture and systemic abuse.

The plan is to change it into a sports, social, and cultural complex serving nearby neighborhoods - though surely the country will still maintain its necessary and regular prison system.

Hopefully, Caracas and the US are also being somewhat selective on who they let walk free, given there could be hardened violent criminals and assassins in the mix.

A little over a week after the US incursion into Venezuela and change of government, the head of the country's National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, had first announced the release of a "significant number" of political prisoners.

Under Washington pressure, one prominent name among those freed was the following:

Rocío San Miguel, a vocal critic of Maduro and a defense expert, was the first prisoner confirmed to be freed. Her family told the New York Times that she was taken to the Spanish embassy in Caracas.

Arrested in 2024, she was accused of being involved in a plot to kill the then-president and faced charges of treason, conspiracy and terrorism. Her arrest shocked human rights activists and, because her whereabouts were unknown, was labelled as potential "enforced disappearance" by the UN Human Rights Office.

Rights groups have so far tallied that just over 300 prisoners have been released under Delcy Rodriguez - a small number which again suggests they are likely being selective about it. This new bill means hundreds are set to follow.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/venezuela-unveils-amnesty-bill-mass-release-political-prisoners

'House Dems unlikely to vote to reopen government'

 United States House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told House Speaker Mike Johnson that Democratic lawmakers will not help Republicans pass the spending bill to reopen the government, US media reported on Saturday. According to CNN, the Democrats said the legislation is "not their deal to pass," and they are not "inclined to help the GOP out."

The dispute between the parties over government funding centers around the Democrats' refusal to allocate resources for the Department of Homeland Security, whose Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have led a violent crackdown on immigration in Minnesota, including killing two people. A spending bill was adopted by the Senate yesterday, but it also requires a vote in the House, which is set for Monday. Johnson allegedly intends to bring the legislation up for a vote under suspension of the rules, a process that would require a two-thirds majority and would depend on Democratic support.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/House-Dems-unlikely-to-vote-to-reopen-government/65582395

ICE agents chase down migrant sex predator after judge allows him to stroll out of NYC courthouse

 An alleged crack-smoking, sexual-predator migrant wanted by ICE was allowed to flee through a back door of a Manhattan courthouse — infuriating federal agents, The Post has learned.

Gerardo Miguel Mora, 45, was arrested Thursday for shoplifting and possession of stolen property after allegedly snatching $130 in items from an H&M display case in Midtown that day, court records show.

Gerardo Miguel Mora, 45, was arrested in January for possession of crack and on Thursday for shoplifting.Obtained by the NY Post

Mora, whose country of origin was not disclosed, was collared on the Upper West Side on Jan. 7 for possession of alleged crack cocaine, according to a criminal complaint. That case is pending in court.

In 2011, Mora was busted for attempted rape and strangulation after he allegedly followed a 21-year-old woman home in Midtown, choked her and tried to remove her clothes, police sources said.

He was stopped by a bystander who heard the woman’s cries and came to her aid, holding Mora down until cops arrived, the sources said. 

He was presumably deported after that, and was off the radar for 12 years. But in 2023 he was back in the US and arrested for showing a false ID.

Federal authorities had been looking for Mora on a criminal arrest warrant under a section of the US code that concerns “reentry of removed aliens,” law enforcement sources said.

Judge Sheridan Jack-Browne had a copy of the federal criminal arrest warrant for Mora but released him, according to a police source.Facebook/sjbforjudge

But on Thursday in a court hearing on desk appearance tickets, the judge let Mora waltz out of the courtroom, sources said.

The shoplifting charge itself was not bail eligible, but Judge Sheridan Jack-Browne, a Democrat who won a special election last year in Brooklyn, would have had the federal arrest warrant, two sources told The Post.

The warrant is actually put in a folder for the judge to peruse on the bench.

“Everything was sent over” to the courthouse by ICE, a federal law enforcement source said.

But instead of handing him over to waiting ICE agents, Mora was allowed to simply slip out the back door of Manhattan Criminal Court, law enforcement sources said.

“They refused to hand him over,” the irate fed said. “They let him out the back to avoid ICE.”

ICE agents realized Mora had been released, and chased him down outside, a source said.

Jack-Browne is a Democrat who was elected in Brooklyn, records show.Facebook/sjbforjudge

Mora’s now in federal custody. The Department of Justice could prosecute Mora, deport him or both.

Because it’s a sanctuary city, New York doesn’t work with the feds when it comes to immigration enforcement. But allegations of actively obstructing the feds are unusual.

The feds have recently delivered warrants for three other criminal migrants that haven’t been honored, law enforcement sources said.

“Unfortunately, that’s what we do now,” said a longtime NYPD officer dismayed by the city’s policy of icing out ICE. “We don’t acknowledge any federal anything. I don’t think that’s right. They came into the country the wrong way and they committed a crime. 

The Baxter Street entrance of Manhattan Criminal Court atWilliam Farrington for NY Post

“They should be deported,” the cop added. “We should be able to hand them over to the feds.”

In some case the feds have gone after judges that it feels have obstructed ICE operations.

Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan faces up to five years in prison after she was convicted of felony obstruction last year for helping an undocumented immigrant evade ICE agents in her courtroom.

Jack-Browne and the state Office of Court Administration did not return requests for comment. The Department of Homeland Security did not comment.

https://nypost.com/2026/01/31/us-news/ice-agents-chase-wanted-illegal-migrant-after-hes-allowed-to-leave-nyc-criminal-court/