The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services plans to furlough 41% of its workforce if Congress fails to prevent a looming government shutdown, suspending critical functions including public health messaging, contractor oversight, and medical research.
Search This Blog
Tuesday, September 30, 2025
'US government shutdown to furlough 41% of health agency workers'
'KFF: Docs With Troubled Pasts Are Performing Cosmetic Surgeries Tied to Pain, Injuries'
Not long after California surgeon Andrew S. Hsu, MD, landed a job with a cosmetic surgery chain in Georgia, several of his patients suffered disfiguring injuries, and even his new employer had doubts about his competence, court records allege.
Hsu, a board-certified general surgeon, was one of six out-of-state doctors who joined the Atlanta Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery center during the pandemic. The surgeons received temporary licenses to practice in Georgia, which state officials grantedopens in a new tab or window in response to the sudden need for more medical personnel to address the COVID-19 outbreak -- even though the center specialized in elective cosmetic surgeries, such as Brazilian butt lifts, or BBLs, and liposuction, paid for in cash or on credit.
The Atlanta center announced its openingopens in a new tab or window in March 2021 as an expansion of New York-based Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery, which markets "precision body contouring" for about a dozen surgery clinics in eight states, promising patients a "dream body in just one visitopens in a new tab or window."
But the Atlanta center's early days were marred by allegations of substandard patient care. Court records show that at least 20 women filed medical malpractice lawsuits against the facility, or its owner and surgeons. Hsu was named as a defendant in seven suits filed against the Atlanta center, more than any other physician there. An eighth patient sued Hsu alleging negligence in an operation he performed at a Goals office in New York.
Hsu did not respond to requests for comment. Goals declined to comment. Both have denied any negligence.
Cosmetic surgery chains across the country are attracting patients by promising "minimally invasive" operations to reshape their bodies or get rid of stubborn fat -- even helping arrange outside financing for people who can't pay up front. Hundreds of thousands of patients are undergoing such procedures each year, and plastic surgeons can make more than $500,000 each year in one of the highest-paid specialtiesopens in a new tab or window in American medicine.
An investigation by KFF Health News found that lawsuits filed by injured patients have trailed the industry's growth, in some cases alleging that surgeons lacked adequate training, had histories of malpractice lawsuits, or had faced disciplinary action by state medical licensing boards -- yet crossed into another state and kept practicing.
In the Atlanta lawsuits, Goals has denied any negligence and won dismissal of several of them because patients had signed papers agreeing to outside arbitration -- which requires them to resolve disputes privately and outside the court system.
Yet Goals argued in a separate contract dispute that several of its Atlanta surgeons, including Hsu, were indeed prone to problems -- either because they lacked adequate training or had troubled pasts, including investigations by state medical licensing boards into misconduct, court records show. One of Hsu's Atlanta patients said in a separate lawsuit that she suffered in pain for over a year because a piece of a scalpel was left inside her body after a BBL and liposuction.
In a June 2023 court filing in that contract dispute, Goals blamed the problems on a medical staffing firm -- Barton Associates, a private equity-ownedopens in a new tab or window firm in Massachusetts -- it said failed to do adequate background checks on the doctors it supplied. Barton denied the allegations and said it met all terms of the contract.
No public database exists to help patients learn the full practice histories of physicians, including cosmetic surgeons. And patients are largely left on their own to decipher which certificates hanging on a surgeon's wall, or ballyhooed in web advertising, signify appropriate training and which do not. Disputes among medical specialty groups over whose members are the best qualifiedopens in a new tab or window to perform cosmetic operations -- and deliver the best results -- add to the confusion.
No government agency tracks injuries or other complication rates at clinics offering cosmetic surgery or any other type of operations. And in many jurisdictions, including Georgia, gaining access to court records -- a possible red flag for spotting problems -- is laborious and costly.
Charleetra Hornes, 52, who lives in the Atlanta suburbs and is suing the Goals center for medical malpractice, said she knew nothing of its alleged early troubles and chose the company because its advertising promised "minimal downtimeopens in a new tab or window" for recovery and that she would remain awake during the operation.
She said she paid $6,650 for a "double BBL," in which fat is suctioned from the stomach, purified, and injected into the buttocks and hips to create what Goals calls a "natural-looking enhancement.opens in a new tab or window"
Goals went ahead with her surgery on July 2, 2022, even though she had tested positive for COVID that day, according to the suit. Hornes alleged that 2 days before the surgery Goals assigned her to surgeon Thomas Shannon, MD, who has worked for Goals in Georgia and Texas.
Though staff gave her pills to manage the discomfort, Hornes said, she suffered "excruciating pain" during the procedure, according to the suit.
That night, she spiked a fever that sent her to the emergency room. She spent 2 weeks in the hospital recovering from injuries, including a "severe burn on her side," according to the suit.
"I've been disfigured and burned up, and it's not fair," she said in an interview.
In June 2024, Hornes sued Shannon, the Goals center, and Barton Associates, alleging malpractice. On Sept. 2, a Georgia judge dismissed Shannon from the case, ruling that Hornes failed to serve him with the complaint in Texas before the statute of limitations ran out. He did not respond to requests for comment.
In a separate order issued on the same day, the judge also dismissed the other defendants, citing the statute of limitations issue and that Hornes had previously signed an arbitration agreement. Some cosmetic surgery chains and other medical practices ask patients to sign such agreements.
Hornes wishes she had learned more about the Atlanta surgery center, instead of accepting what she calls its "flashy" come-ons. "I wish I would have taken it more seriously," she said in an interview, "because it was life-altering."
Useful Tools
KFF Health News identified more than 200 lawsuits filed against multistate cosmetic surgery companies, mostly over the past 7 years, including cases involving a dozen deaths, using databases of court records.
Lawsuits by themselves don't prove wrongdoing. Many cases are settled under confidential terms that keep critical details under wraps. Yet medical authorities and most physician licensing boards regard malpractice cases and settlements as a useful tool for detectingopens in a new tab or window possible patterns of substandard healthcare that may harm patients.
Court files show that surgeons who were sued numerous times for malpractice -- and in some cases disciplined by state medical boards for misconduct -- have managed to get hired by cosmetic surgery chains.
Goals, owned by physician Sergey Voskin, MD, has contracted with eight surgeons with three or more malpractice cases filed against them, including in the Atlanta area, court records allege. Gerald Hickson, MD, founding director of the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy and an expert on medical malpractice issues, called that number of suits a "warning" of possible problems, despite their outcome.
Earlier this year, a Pennsylvania woman identified in court filings as "P.C." sued Goals, Voskin, and surgeon Peter Driscoll, MD, alleging Driscoll came on board despite an "extensive history of malpractice allegations, licensing suspensions and discipline" in Texasopens in a new tab or window and Californiaopens in a new tab or window, according to medical board records cited in the suit. Companies hiring doctors have ready access to the nonpublic National Practitioner Data Bankopens in a new tab or window, which details disciplinary problems in a doctor's past. But it's not clear from court records whether anybody made these standard background checks. Goals did not respond to a request for comment.
The suit also accuses Goals of consumer fraud for touting its surgeons as "double if not triple board certified plastic surgeons." According to the complaint, Driscoll was board-certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology, a specialty that focuses on treatment and surgery of head and neck areas. Driscoll is no longer certifiedopens in a new tab or window in the specialty, according to the American Board of Medical Specialties website.
The woman alleges that Driscoll sexually harassed her and made "unwanted and unwelcome sexual contact" during a BBL procedure in June 2022 at a Goals office in New Jersey.
According to the suit, staff members overheard Driscoll watching pornography in an office bathroom multiple times, but Goals did not terminate him at the time. New Jersey's State Board of Medical Examiners suspended Driscoll's licenseopens in a new tab or window in February 2023 related to the incident, and the woman's lawsuit is pending in federal court in New Jersey. Goals and Voskin have denied the allegations in the suit and filed a motion to dismiss or compel arbitration of the case. Driscoll, who has not filed a response with the court, could not be reached for comment.
Performance Issues Not 'Disqualifying'
Other cosmetic surgery chains have faced multiple malpractice actions targeting surgeons or other healthcare providers who staff their clinics, court records show.
The surgeon roster at Mia Aesthetics, a Miami-based chain that operates 13 cosmetic surgery offices nationwide, lists four doctors with three or more malpractice actions since 2020, court records show.
Nearly a dozen injured patients have filed lawsuits criticizing the credentials of doctors and nurse practitioners affiliated with Belle Medical, including the family of a 70-year-old Utah woman with five children who died in the car 2 days after liposuction as her husband rushed her from home to a hospital, according to court records.
Her husband alleges he called Belle Medical's office the day after the procedure to say his wife was having difficulty breathing and heart palpitations and couldn't walk more than a short distance, which the lawsuit argued were "textbook symptoms of pulmonary embolism, or blood clot in the lung." According to the suit, nobody at Belle Medical advised the family to seek immediate medical care. An autopsy found she died from "bilateral pulmonary emboli," according to the suit.
Backed by Peterson Partners, a Utah private equity and investment firm, Belle Medical operates in Utah, Idaho, and Oklahoma, offering liposuction and other cosmetic surgery. Neither Belle Medical nor Peterson Partners responded to requests for comment. In court filings, Belle Medical has argued that its medical providers are independent contractors who are solely responsible for any procedures they perform.
Private equity-backed Sono Bello, the largest of the cosmetic surgery chains with more than 100 locations nationwide, has defended more than a dozen lawsuits alleging the company contracted with inadequately trained doctors or practitioners previously disciplined by medical licensing boards. In May 2023, Ohio's medical board revoked the license of a Sono Bello contract surgeon after three of her patients died, two of them following procedures at a Sono Bello office in the Cleveland area, according to medical board records.
Robert Centeno, MD, Sono Bello's medical director for the East region, told KFF Health News that many surgeons have past performance issues, which he called "not, in fact, disqualifying."
"The vast majority of our colleagues are extremely professional and committed to their profession," he said in an interview. "And while there may be a momentary lapse or issue with their practice, most of our surgeons take those sanctions, take that counseling, that advice, and improve their practices and go on to be very, very productive members of the medical community."
Asked about malpractice lawsuits filed against the company, Centeno said that Sono Bello has "performed over 300,000 procedures to date," which he described as "more procedures for more patients completed safely than anyone else in the industry. It would be natural and understandable to know that at some point during that process, that a patient has actually sued us," Centeno said.
'Unable to Perform'
In early 2020, as the pandemic slowed business in New York City, Goals sought to expand to Atlanta -- a hot market for its BBLs. In a PR Newswire releaseopens in a new tab or window, Goals promised patients "amazing contours" and boasted of having "some of the most experienced, and aesthetically forward surgeons in the industry." BBLs and liposuction make up 95% of its business, marketed to mostly Black and Hispanic women, Goals owner Voskin testified in a deposition filed this year in the Driscoll case. Many Atlanta patients suing the company paid roughly $6,000 to $8,000 for their surgeries, court records show.
Goals initially staffed the Atlanta center through Barton Associates. Many hospitals and medical offices rely on such firms to find temporary doctors and other staff. Under the deal, Barton charged Goals $1,400 for each procedure and paid about $600 of that to the surgeon, according to Goals' court filings.
In 2023, Barton sued Goals in a Massachusetts court, alleging it was owed $487,000 in fees. Goals admitted that it "temporarily ceased payment" to Barton. But it fired back with a counterclaim accusing Barton of failing to check the qualifications and backgrounds of surgeons as required by the agreement.
Goals named five surgeons Barton sent to the center, including Hsu, and pointed to the spate of malpractice cases in Atlanta to bolster its argument.
Goals said it "became immediately apparent" that another surgeon was "fundamentally unable to perform his duties." The surgeon was "abrasive, vulgar and could not conduct himself in accordance with reasonable professional standards that were expected in a medical workplace," according to Goals' counterclaim.
A second surgeon Barton presented as "highly skilled" turned out to have "an extensive history of complaints about his professional conduct" in two other states, according to the counterclaim.
Barton and Goals settled the case and counterclaim in April 2024 under confidential terms. Barton did not respond to requests for comment. Barton denied Goals' allegations in earlier court filings and said that it "complied fully" with the terms of its contract with the surgery company.
In its counterclaim, Goals argued that shortly after Hsu joined the staff in 2021, it learned he had "multiple issues" in California and "was about to lose his medical license as a result," according to a court filing.
Goals provided "significant legal and other assistance" to keep that from happening and Hsu "required substantial training in order to do acceptable work on patients," the company argued in court filings.
Seven women filed malpractice suits in 2023 alleging they sustained injuries from BBLs and liposuction Hsu performed at the Atlanta office between mid-February 2021 and the end of June 2021, court records show. Barton, the staffing firm, also is a defendant in these cases and has denied wrongdoing. Hsu has denied wrongdoing in the cases and sought to enforce arbitration agreements.
Hsu's emergency Georgia medical license, approved in January 2021, expired in April 2022, state records show. Hsu is licensed in New Yorkopens in a new tab or window and Californiaopens in a new tab or window, where he has also worked for Goals.
Two suits accuse Hsu of leaving a piece of metal inside the bodies of women, a calamity patient safety experts believe should never occur.opens in a new tab or window
In one Atlanta case, a patient who alleged she had experienced constant pain since her surgery at Goals in 2021 said she discovered why more than a year later when a chest x-ray ordered after a car crash showed a piece of scalpel blade in her upper abdomen, according to her court filings. The action against Hsu and Barton Associates was settled early this year, court records show.
In the second case, a New Jersey woman who had a BBL at Goals' Harlem office in New York City in February 2022 alleged she overheard Hsu say in the operating room that he had "left something inside of her," which turned out to be a metal liposuction cannula tip that had broken off in her stomach. A judge dismissed her lawsuit due to an arbitration clause. She filed a notice of appeal, but the case was settled in August.
The California medical board's investigation of Hsu ended in October 2023 with a settlement and disciplinary orderopens in a new tab or window. The state accused him of "repeated negligent acts" in treating six patients dating to 2016, including three people who died. None involved cosmetic surgery like his work at Goals.
The board revoked his license but stayed the action and imposed a 4-year probation, tacking on a $24,000 penalty to cover costs of the investigation. The order also required Hsu to find a practitioner to help oversee his practice and prohibits him from serving on any on-call panel for general surgery. In settling the case, Hsu did not admit any wrongdoing.
Goals has featured Hsu in a TikTok videoopens in a new tab or window, and boasts on its websiteopens in a new tab or window that he is a "highly skilled surgical specialist," who provides "top-notch surgical care."
Fellowship Training
How much training cosmetic surgery chains demand of surgeons varies, judging by physician service contracts obtained by KFF Health News through court filings. Some contracts simply require that the doctor hold a valid state medical license, while others specify that a doctor "represents" that they are qualifiedopens in a new tab or window to perform cosmetic surgery and have not been disciplined by licensing boards or been hit with major malpractice awards.
Sono Bello takes a different route. The company sponsors a 6- to 8-week training course for surgeons, which it calls a "fellowship," and posts details onlineopens in a new tab or window.
Sono Bello accepts applicants from more than half a dozen surgical specialties and focuses its training on liposuction and a type of tummy tuck procedure called AbEXopens in a new tab or window.
Court records show that Sono Bello has defended at least a dozen lawsuits from patients who argued some surgeons lacked sufficient training or had other problems, or alleged they were misled by some advertising that described surgeons who completed the fellowship as "board certified plastic surgeons."
Sono Bello's credentialing process came under attack in a 2023 malpractice lawsuit filed by Shirley Webb, a 79-year-old Nevada woman who spent months in hospitals and rehabilitation care recovering from sepsis after a tummy tuck and liposuction performed by surgeon Charles Kim, MD, in Las Vegas in December 2022.
Kim, a colorectal surgeon, took the Sono Bello fellowship from July 2022 to October 2022, court records show. In a deposition, Kim, who is board-certified in general surgery, stated that Sono Bello hired him knowing he had been disciplined by Nevada's state medical licensing board for alleged malpractice in which a patient he operated on died. Kim paid a $4,000 fine and received a letter of reprimand in settling the medical board case without admitting wrongdoing.
Kim also testified in the medical malpractice case that Sono Bello was aware he had previously settled four medical malpractice cases, court records show. Christopher Chung, MD, Sono Bello's chief medical officer, said the company verified that Kim's state medical license and other credentials "were up to date and in good standing" before it hired him. "We reviewed his surgical log, which detailed the voluminous and complex surgeries he had performed at the hospital where he was then employed, and received positive references from his employer and other surgeons," Chung said in an emailed statement.
A medical expert hired by Webb's legal team opined that Sono Bello's use of the term "fellowship" is deceptive because the program is not accredited, or recognized by any subspecialty certifying board, professional society, or hospital. A medical fellowship is typically a training program that lasts at least a year. "We strongly disagree with the suggestion that our website is misleading. We accurately state that our physicians are board-certified surgeons -- because they are," Sono Bello spokesperson Mark Firmani said in response.
In her lawsuit, Webb testified that Sono Bello's advertisements on television and online led her to believe the company employed only board-certified plastic surgeons.
Had she been told of Kim's background in advance, "I wouldn't have had the surgery done," Webb testified in a 2024 deposition.
The parties settled the suit early this year under confidential terms.
KFF Health Newsopens in a new tab or window is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF
Musk Nukes His Netflix Subscription After Pro-Trans Kids' Show Sparks Outrage
Netflix has once again been caught pushing pro-transgender agenda through an animated fantasy horror comedy series aimed at young kids that reeks of grooming and brainwashing youth with wokeism.
For anyone who has ever secretly harbored a crush, this pitch perfect love song from Dead End: Paranormal Park — performed by star @ZachBarack with music by Patrick Stump and Michael Kooman — will make your heart soar! pic.twitter.com/be4lEBvHxD
— Netflix (@netflix) June 27, 2022
In a viral post on X, Libs of TikTok highlighted that Dead End: Paranormal Park, created by Hamish Steele and produced by Blink Industries in partnership with Netflix Animation, and distributed by Netflix, created woke propaganda, such as pro-transgender messaging aimed at kids as young as seven years old.
OMG. Dead End Paranormal Park, a show on Netflix, is pushing pro-transgender on CHILDREN.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 29, 2025
This show is advertised for 7-YEAR-OLDS
It’s being promoted on @netflix kids now.
Parents- BEWARE pic.twitter.com/gh5UZftKns
The backlash doesn't stop at the show. Its creator, Hamish Steele, openly mocked Charlie Kirk's political assassination and labeled him a "Nazi" on far-left social media channel BlueSky.
You will never guess who the creator of this show is… a he/they lgbtq bluesky fan who mocked Charlie’s m*rder and called him a nazi
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 30, 2025
Is anyone surprised?? https://t.co/Ei3zEwseoJ pic.twitter.com/fZi7j3Lbwk
And this.
A m*rder-loving groomer! Even worse
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 30, 2025
None of this woke nonsense is surprising anymore. However, what's surprising is Netflix's failure to grasp the reality of the Overton Window shift, where what's considered mainstream and acceptable is no longer far-left but instead middle-right.
"Just cancelled my Netflix subscription. If you employ someone who celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk and makes content that pushes pro-trans content on my kids... ...you will NEVER get a dime of my money It's as simple as that," Matt Van Swol wrote on X.
Elon Musk chimed in, saying, "Same."
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 30, 2025
"It's interesting that Dead End Paranormal Park went ahead and appropriately added a devil sidekick for the "trans" kid," one X user said.
It's interesting that Dead End Paranormal Park went ahead and appropriately added a devil sidekick for the "trans" kid. pic.twitter.com/avkuQDSwAo
— V28 (@VWood28) September 30, 2025
Let the cancellations begin.
— Kim Mayton (@KMayton41) September 30, 2025
Earlier, Musk announced plans to launch a new online encyclopedia platform called "Grokipedia," positioned as a rival to Wikipedia, which he says has been hijacked by far-left activists.
Musk Unveils Grokipedia Plans To Counter Wikipedia's Manipulation Of "Truth" Controlled By Leftists https://t.co/XdrDJzXlzc
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 30, 2025
Musk may be eyeing even greater control over narrative power, which has long been dominated by the far left. He's already cracked MSM narratives with X and Grok, and now he's planning to roll out Grokipedia. Could studios be next? If Musk's goal is to seize narrative control, the logical next step could be Hollywood itself - perhaps he has eyes on Angel Studios?
CDC Director Exposed for Politics at Senate Hearing, Tylenol Warning Finally Arrives
by Paul Thacker
Sorry, I disappeared for a bit. I’ve been traveling for work and fun, and then had to focus on a big project. But I’m back. So let’s look at what happened in the last couple weeks.
First, fired CDC Director Susan Monarez got run over at a Senate hearing for playing politics while claiming, much like Fauci did, that she is the science. Second, we’ll take a look at the crazy news cycle that followed the White House briefing to announce something long known: Tylenol can be dangerous to a growing human fetus.
The Science™ Exposed as Politics
Senator Bill Cassidy held a September 17 hearing titled “Restoring Trust Through Radical Transparency” with fired CDC Director Susan Monarez. And boy did we get some transparency.
The morning of the hearing, I published a piece, here on The DisInformation Chronicle, noting that a leaked document of the powerful lobby Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) called Cassidy a “strategic voice and ally” while highlighting Monarez’s lawyers as Democratic Party operatives, who seemed to be running a squeeze play on the administration.
That piece I wrote on Monarez rocketed all over DC that morning. I heard back from one PR firm that they blasted it to every Member of the House and Senate, including all the health policy people on the Hill. The impact was huge.
During the hearing, Sen. Cassidy tried to position Susan Monarez as a pro-science federal employee standing up to big mean Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., but too many Senators weren’t having it. As I reported in the story that went out the morning of the hearing, Monarez has been working behind the scenes with two of the most notorious anti-Trump attorneys in DC—Abbe Lowell and Mark Zaid—and the politics of this were just too obvious.
Monarez’s constant refrain during the hearing that she was following The Science™ on vaccines and Kennedy wasn’t following The Science™, got hijacked by a series of questions from Florida Sen. Ashley Moody, a former prosecutor, state judge, and Attorney General for Florida.
“Do you want to introduce your lawyers that you brought today?” Sen. Moody asked Monarez. The former CDC Director smiled back, yet refused to name her own lawyers. The two ladies then jostled back and forth for over three minutes—three minutes!!!—with Sen. Moody pressing the former CDC Director to name her two lawyers, and Monarez smiling back with a crazed, cartoonish grin.
Words can’t do this exchange justice. Watch the video. Brutal.
That demented “I just got caught!” smile painted on Monarez’s face stirred other Senators like sharks who could smell the political blood in the water. Monarez was playing games and she wasn’t very good at it. Sen. Markwayne Mullin inquired how Monarez just happened to find Mark Zaid out of all the thousands of lawyers running around Washington.
Sen. Jim Banks then delved even further and discovered that Monarez “couldn’t recall” when or how she hired her attorney, Mark Zaid.
My guess is that Monarez is pretty much done. She got cooked during the hearing, so don’t expect any congressional Committee to invite her back to Washington, because she’s now tainted with politics.
None of the Senators brought up the leaked document exposing Sen. Cassidy as one of industry’s strategic voices and allies, because Senate comity won’t allow for such direct confrontation. I worked for several years in the Senate and can tell you what will happen instead. Senators and staff will whisper about Cassidy’s obvious coordination with industry in the Senate halls and joke that he is positioning himself for a lucrative lobbyist job when he leaves the body in 2026.
On a final note of coincidence, Sen. Cassidy called the hearing with fired CDC Director Susan Monarez the day before the first meeting of the CDC’s new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The group was planning to look into possible vaccine side effects and changes to childhood vaccine schedule, and Sen. Cassidy made clear that he didn’t want the group to find any problems with vaccines. In fact, the entire hearing with fired CDC Director Monarez was called possibly, perhaps, conceivably ALMOST CERTAINTLY to pressure ACIP experts to not find any problems with vaccines.
Right after the hearing, Cassidy entered a press scrum. A reporter asked him that, if CDC’s vaccine panel changes child vaccine schedule, “should the American people have confidence in that decision”?
“No,” Cassidy responded.
Finally, thanks to everyone for making this newsletter possible and having such a huge impact in Washington. While over 36,000 subscribe, only a small portion are paying. If you can afford it, please become a paying member and keep my editor and I out of the poor house.
Yes, Tylenol is Bad. Duh!
The Trump administration broke the internet last week with a press conference announcing that pregnant women should probably avoid using Tylenol (acetaminophen) as it has been linked to developmental disorders such as autism in children. I know that several physicians read this newsletter, and I’ll provide some interesting links to medical research below, but let’s first look at the reaction from liberal media.
COMPLETE. TOTAL. PANIC!!!!
I have said several times on social media, and it deserves repeating here: Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a serious mental health condition that should be treated in the privacy of a therapist’s office, not splashed about on social media. So let’s look at some pretty uncomfortable examples of TDS that help explain why so few trust legacy media anymore.
Here’s Reuters. Note the 2013 story reporting on possible dangers of pregnant mothers taking Tylenol followed by a report last week, stating that their own prior reporting on the possible dangers of pregnant women taking Tylenol is “not backed by science.”
CNN launched its “Fact First” ad campaign in 2017 to negate President Trump’s criticism that they were “fake news.” Since around this same time, CNN ran several stories discussing the possible links between Tylenol (acetaminophen) use by pregnant women and possible developmental disorders such as autism and ADHD in children.
Well, CNN reversed course last week.
I stacked up several of their headlines stretching back 2016. I also drew a blue line in the chronology when CNN reversed course last week after Trump’s press conference drawing attention to the link between Tylenol and autism.
I’m not sure if it’s even fair to do this, because it’s just so obvious that NPR is a public joke that spews anti-Trump nonsense, but yes. NPR also came out to deny its own prior reporting on Tylenol, once Trump linked the drug to autism.
Eric Deggans is NPR’s critic-at-large and the Knight Chair in Journalism and Media Ethics at Washington and Lee University in Virginia, where he oversees teaching on ethics and journalism and organizes ethics conferences. Sounds impressive, no?
Deggans posted on X NPR’s story titled “Trump blames Tylenol for autism. Science doesn’t back him up.” Deggans also made some hoary argument that the company selling Tylenol might be able to “sue the government for wrongly depicting its product.”
Back in 2016, NPR ran a segment discussing the link between acetaminophen use in pregnancy and later behavioral problems in kids, based a study published in JAMA Pediatrics.
So yes. NPR is a clown show, and journalism professor Eric Deggan is helping run the circus.
But it wasn’t just American media who went nuts and forgot their own reporting just because Trump said something. The Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) ran a slew of articles complaining that Trump made claims “without evidence” linking Tylenol to later problems with children, even running one story where a doctor called this a “manufactured conspiracy.”
But wait…..
Just a handful of years ago, the CBC reported that scientific studies found a “growing body of research suggests acetaminophen might alter fetal development.” That’s right. Here’s the CBC segment.
Of course, there’s more of this nuttiness. TDS is rampant in the media. But let’s move on to the science.
The White House released a statement citing several studies linking acetaminophen use in pregnant women, especially late in pregnancy, with long-term neurological effects in their children. The statement linked to a 2021 international consensus statement published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology and supported by over 90 researchers that called for “precautionary action” while recommending that pregnant women “minimize exposure” to acetaminophen “by using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time.”
The consensus statement’s lead author is Ann Bauer, a professor at University of Massachusetts. Bauer is also co-author with Andreas Baccarelli, who runs Harvard’s School of Public Health, on a recent review in the journal Environmental Health that further supports an association between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and increased incidence of neurodevelopmental problems in the fetus.
Here’s the review’s conclusions:
Nature attacked this review and any evidence linking acetaminophen use and autism in a news story published shortly after the Trump press conference. Quoting a spokesperson from Tylenol, Nature wrote, “We believe independent, sound science clearly shows that taking acetaminophen does not cause autism.”
“Here Nature examines the evidence for a link between the medication, which is used to treat fever as well as pain, and autism,” the journal’s science writers alleged in the news article.
But here’s the funny. Nature itself published the 2021 international consensus statement by Ann Bauer that was “supported by 91 scientists, clinicians and public health professionals from across the globe” and which summarized “evidence and call for precautionary action” on Tylenol.
I’m not joking. The consensus statement was published by Nature’s own sister journal “Nature Reviews Endocrinology.”
However, Trump critics have been citing a 2024 study published in JAMA, that examined siblings born in Sweden, to undermine the body of evidence finding acetaminophen use during pregnancy increases children’s risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya addressed the hype surrounding this study in a thread on X, pointing out the problems of sibling studies, which can introduce their own biases.
But for those interested in the best analysis of the evidence, professors Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson have spent decades as leaders in evidence-based medicine and offered their own assessment in their newsletter Trust the Evidence. Heneghan and Jefferson ripped into the review published by Bauer and Harvard’s Baccarelli in Environmental Health for failing to provide “strong evidence.” Again, this is the same review the White House cited in their statement.
However, Heneghan and Jefferson did find and discuss a handful of high-quality reviews that all pointed to an association between acetaminophen use in pregnancy and later neurodevelopmental disorders in children such as ADHD and autism spectrum disorder.
“All of these reviews (and there are more) suggest a connection,” they write.
On a final final note, several liberal pregnant women went on TikTok, downing Tylenol to laugh at Trump and “prove” Tylenol doesn’t cause autism. A nurse later claimed that a woman in her city actually overdosed while performing this stunt and died. The nurse then claimed that people began calling her employer to get her fired and ringing the number for an apartment where she used to live to harass the current occupants.
I can’t prove if the claims made by this nurse are true, but here’s a video of Dr. Michelle Vu, a pregnant physician in New York State, taking a Tylenol for no apparent reason except to laugh at Trump. Yes, it’s really bad out there.
TDS is a real thing.
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/weeks-long-wrap-up-cdc-director-exposed










