Search This Blog

Sunday, June 3, 2018

#ASCO18: Adaptimmune presents on T cell sarcoma program


 Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc (Nasdaq:ADAP), a leader in T-cell therapy to treat cancer, presented initial data from the ongoing pilot study of NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells in myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS). With eight patients treated, the best overall responses include three confirmed partial responses, one unconfirmed partial response, three stable disease, and one recently treated patient awaiting assessment. These data were presented during an oral presentation by Dr. Sandra P. D’Angelo of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting.
GlaxoSmithKline plc (LSE:GSK) (NYSE:GSK) exercised its option to exclusively license the right to research, develop, and commercialize the NY‑ESO SPEAR T-cell therapy program in September 2017. Transition of this program to GSK is ongoing.
“We continue to see responses in patients with advanced MRCLS who have failed previous standard chemotherapy,” said Rafael Amado, Adaptimmune’s Chief Medical Officer. “We observe significant proliferation of our SPEAR T‑cells in peripheral blood, and infiltration into metastases that were previously devoid of inflammatory cells. These findings bode well for a broad therapeutic potential of SPEAR T‑cells across multiple solid tumors.”
Conference Call Information
The Company will host a live teleconference to answer questions about the updated safety data on June 4, 2018 at 8:00 a.m. EDT (1:00 p.m. BST). The live webcast of the conference call will be available via the events page of Adaptimmune’s corporate website at https://bit.ly/2shwniM. An archive will be available after the call at the same address. To participate in the live conference call, if preferred, please dial please dial +1-(833) 652-5917 (U.S.) or +1-(430) 775-1624 (International). After placing the call, please ask to be joined into the Adaptimmune conference call and provide the confirmation code (9199456).

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Cleveland Clinic operating income drops 22% in Q1 as expenses climb

  • Cleveland Clinic reported $2.12 billion in revenue for the first quarter of 2018, up 3.6% from $2.07 billion in the 2017 first quarter.
  • The gain was muted, however, by higher operating expenses, which rose 3.3% from the prior year, according to unaudited financial statementsreleased this week. 
  • Operating income for the period dropped 22% to $47.6 million, from $60.7 million last year.
 
 

 

Although nonprofit health systems have reported some positive financial results recently, they face a gloomy landscape. Last year saw an increased number of credit downgrades for nonprofit hospitals, and Moody's Investors Service downgraded its outlook for the sector to negative in December. A vast institute like Cleveland Clinic, however, can count on relative stability.
In its report, the system affirmed a strategy that focuses on value-based care with the goal of adapting to "consolidation, a blurring of traditional roles, and new entrants with innovative business models and compelling customer value propositions." That includes strengthening population health and community-based efforts as well as more attention to the needs of caregivers.
Cleveland Clinic attributed the Q1 jump in operating expenses to increases in salaries, wages and benefits, up $26 million or 2.2% for the quarter, as well as pharmaceutical costs and supplies. To address the upswing in expenses, the health system is developing and implementing a series of cost management and containment initiatives that will make care more affordable for patients and enable investments in key strategic goals.
Inpatient admissions declined 3.4% to 41.6 million, from 43.1 million year ago, while total patient days inched up 0.3% — from 222,794 to 223,358. Emergency room visits also dipped slightly, to 160,286 from 161,138. Outpatient evaluations and management visits were flat,compared with last year.
After adjusting for nonoperating gains — down 76% to $37.1 million — net income for the quarter totaled $106.5 million.
Cleveland Clinic’s operating income was up and down in 2017, ending the year at $328 million after dropping to $243 million the prior year. Operating income plunged 71% from 2015 to 1016.
Other nonprofit hospitals also saw gains last year. UPMC reported net income hit $1.3 billion on revenues of $16 billion for 2017. Mayo Clinic also had a good year, with operating income of $707 million and $12 billion in revenue. Operating income grew by more than $225 million and revenue was $1 billion more than in 2016.
And Geisinger Health System reported its net income climbed nearly $200 million to $324.9 million in the first half of fiscal year 2018, compared with the same period a year earlier, for an excess margin of 9%.
https://bit.ly/2ssu2l7

Benefit change could raise costs for patients getting drug copay assistance


Since Kristen Catton started taking the drug Gilenya two years ago, she’s had only one minor relapse of her multiple sclerosis, following a bout of the flu.
She can walk comfortably, see clearly and work part time as a nurse case manager at a hospital near her home in Columbus, Ohio. This is a big step forward; two drugs she previously tried failed to control her physical symptoms or prevent repeated flare-ups.
This year, Catton, 48, got a shock. Her health insurance plan changed the way it handles the payments that the drugmaker Novartis makes to help cover her prescription’s cost. Her copayment is roughly $3,800 a month, but Novartis helps reduce that out-of-pocket expense with payments to the health plan. The prescription costs about $90,000 a year.
Those Novartis payments no longer counted toward her family plan’s $8,800 annual pharmacy deductible. That meant once she hit the drugmaker’s payment cap for the copay assistance in April, she would have to pay the entire copayment herself until her pharmacy deductible was met.

Catton is one of a growing number of consumers taking expensive drugs who are discovering they are no longer insulated by copay assistance programs that help cover their costs. Through such programs, consumers typically owe nothing or have modest monthly copayments for pricey drugs because many drug manufacturers pay a patient’s portion of the cost to the health plan, which chips away at the consumer’s deductible and out-of-pocket maximum limits until the health plan starts paying the whole tab.
Under new “copay accumulator” programs, that no longer happens.
In these programs, the monthly copayments drug companies make don’t count toward patients’ plan deductibles or out-of-pocket maximums. Once patients hit the annual limit on a drugmaker’s copay assistance program, they’re on the hook for their entire monthly copayment until they reach their plan deductible and spending limits.

Catton put the $3,800 May copayment on a credit card. She knows her insurer will start paying the entire tab once she hits the pharmacy deductible. But, she said, she can’t afford to pay nearly $9,000 a year out of pocket for the foreseeable future.
“I’m talking to my doctor to see if I can I take it every other day,” she said. “I guess I’m winging it until I can figure out what to do.”
Drug copay assistance programs have long been controversial.
Proponents say that in an age of increasingly high deductibles and coinsurance charges, such help is the only way some patients can afford crucial medications.
But opponents say the programs increase drug spending on expensive brand-name drugs by discouraging people from using more cost-effective alternatives.

Switching to a cheaper drug may not be an option, said Bari Talente, executive vice president for advocacy at the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
“Generally the multiple sclerosis drugs are not substitutable,” she said. “Most have different mechanisms of action, different administration and different side effect profiles.” Generics, when they’re available, are pricey too, typically costing $60,000 or more annually, she said.
Most MS drug annual copay assistance limits, if they have them, are between $9,000 and $12,000, Talente said.
Employers argue that the drug copayment programs are an attempt to circumvent their efforts to manage health care costs. For example, employers may try to discourage the use of a specialty drug when there’s a lower-cost drug available by requiring higher patient cost sharing.

There’s also the issue of fairness.
“From an employer perspective, everyone under the plan has to be treated the same,” said Brian Marcotte, president and CEO of the National Business Group on Health (NBGH), which represents large employers.
If someone needs medical care such as surgery, for example, that person doesn’t get help covering his deductible, while the person with the expensive drug might, he said.
According to an NBGH survey of about 140 multistate employers with at least 5,000 workers, 17% reported they have a copay accumulator program in place this year, Marcotte said. Fifty-six percent reported they’re considering them for 2019 or 2020.
If there is no comparable drug available, drug copayment programs may have a role to play if they can be structured so that participating patients are paying some amount toward their deductible, Marcotte said. But, he said, assistance programs for drugs that are available from more than source, such as a brand drug that is also available as a generic, shouldn’t be allowed.
In 2016, 20% of prescriptions for brand-name drugs used a drug copay assistance coupon, according to an analysis by researchers at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics. Among the top 200 drugs based on spending in 2014, the study found that 132 were brand-name drugs, and 90 of them offered copay coupons. Fifty-one percent of the drugs with copay coupons had no substitute at all or only another brand drug as a close therapeutic substitute, the analysis found.
Advocates for people with HIV and AIDS say copay accumulators are cropping up in their patients’ plans and beginning to cause patients trouble. Drugs to treat HIV typically don’t have generic alternatives.

The biggest impact for the community their organizations serve may be for PrEP, a daily pill that helps prevent HIV infection, said Carl Schmid, deputy executive director at the AIDS Institute, an advocacy group. A 30-day supply of PrEP (brand-name Truvada) can cost nearly $2,000. Drug manufacturer Gilead offers a copay assistance program that covers up to $3,600 annually in copay assistance, with no limit on how much is paid per month.
“They’re at risk for HIV, they know it and want to protect themselves,” Schmid said. “It’s a public health issue.”
Earlier this month, the AIDS Institute was among 60 HIV organizations that sent letters to state attorneys general and insurance commissioners across the country asking them to investigate this practice, which has emerged in employer and marketplace plans this year.
Compounding advocates’ concerns is the fact that these coverage changes are frequently not communicated clearly to patients, Schmid said. They are typically buried deep in the plan documents and don’t appear in the user-friendly summary of benefits and coverage that consumers receive from their health plan.
“How is a patient to know?” Schmid asks. They learn of the change only when they get a big bill midway through the year. “And then they’re stuck.”
KHN’s coverage of prescription drug development, costs and pricing is supported by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.

Look harder at how hospital readmits are defined as quality measure


Healthcare regulators and insurers have long attached a high value to hospital readmissions rates as an indicator of hospital quality.
But a new study published Thursday in the New England Journal of Medicine offers more evidence that the quality calculation is getting less accurate over time. Why? Because it omits the increasing number of patients admitted for observational stays.
Amber Sabbatini, M.D.
(University of Washington
School of Medicine)
“Not only are readmissions going up for patients who are discharged from an observation stay, but the number of patients being placed in observation is going up each year,” Amber Sabbatini, M.D., assistant professor of emergency medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine and lead author of the study, told FierceHealthcare.
The study examined patient-level claims data from 2007 to 2015 from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database.
In 2015, 57% of emergency department patients admitted to hospitals were inpatients, while 43% were admitted for observation stays. The data showed hospital readmissions within 30 days of an inpatient discharge dropped from 17.8% to 15.5% between 2007 and 2015. Hospital readmissions within 30 days of an observation stay increased from 10.9% to 14.8% in that time.

This could obviously have a wide-reaching impact for hospitals.
Hospitals are required to report their readmissions data by commercial payers and state Medicaid agencies which occasionally link reimbursement and purchasing agreements to performance. In 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services introduced the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, penalizing hospitals with higher-than-expected 30-day readmission rates.
Sabbatini said she does not believe hospitals are gaming their admissions status in order to improve for data. But the phenomenon, which has been observed by other researchers in recent years, deserves a harder look and some thought about how to incorporate observation data into quality measures.
“The intent of readmission measures in the first place is to improve quality of care for patients with acute illnesses. But we’re essentially ignoring a pretty large group of patients who are hospitalized with acute illnesses under the current framework,” Sabbatini said.

Nabriva Therapeutics initiated at buy by Northland

Nabriva Therapeutics initiated with an Outperform at Northland. Northland initiated Nabriva Therapeutics with an Outperform and $17.50 price target.

Sophiris started at buy by Jones Trading

Jones Trading initiated Sophiris Bio with a Buy and $12 price target.

Gene sequencing study finds linked cancers: #ASCO18


Lynch syndrome, a rare hereditary disease typically associated with an increased risk of colorectal and endometrial cancers, appears to be linked with several additional types of cancer than previously thought, U.S. researchers said on Saturday.
The finding, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting in Chicago, followed a genetic analysis of 15,000 tumor samples from 50 different cancer types looking for glitches known as high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). The genetic marker is associated with a large number of DNA abnormalities in a tumor.
Patients with colorectal and endometrial cancers are routinely tested for MSI-H to screen for Lynch syndrome, which occurs in about 1 in 300 people in the United States or about 3 percent of all cases of colorectal cancer.
People who test positive, and their family members, receive genetic counseling, aggressive screening and potentially preventive surgeries.
In the new study, researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York found that 16 percent of patients with a wider variety of tumors that featured MSI-H also had Lynch syndrome.
“Our findings suggest that all patients with MSI-H tumors should be tested for Lynch syndrome, regardless of cancer type or personal history,” said study author Dr. Zsofia Kinga Stadler.

Tumors in the study came from patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering and were analyzed using a next-generation sequencing test called MSK-IMPACT that looks for mutations in hundreds of cancer-related genes.
About a quarter of the roughly 1,000 tumors identified with high or moderate levels of MSI were colorectal or endometrial cancers.
But nearly 50 percent of such tumors found in patients who tested positive for Lynch syndrome had cancer types not previously, or rarely, linked to the syndrome, including mesothelioma, sarcoma, adrenocortical cancer, melanoma, prostate and ovarian germ cell cancer.
“These are tumor types that we would never have referred for genetic counseling,” said Dr. Shannon Westin of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, an ASCO expert who was not involved in the study.
Testing for MSI-H has become increasingly common since last spring, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of Merck & Co’s immunotherapy drug Keytruda in MSI-H tumors, regardless of where in the body they occur.
At MD Anderson, where Westin treats patients with gynecologic cancers, testing for a large panel of genetic mutations has long been routine.
She said the tests have also become increasingly covered by insurance companies since March, when the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it would cover Foundation Medicine’s next-generation sequencing test for Medicare-eligible patients with advanced cancer.
“Data like this is going to encourage (these tests) to become the standard of care,” Westin said.