Search This Blog

Thursday, June 6, 2019

ContraVir up 139% premarket on encouraging CRV431 data

Thinly traded nano cap ContraVir Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:CTRV) is up 139% premarket on increased volume in reaction to positive preclinical data on NASH candidate CRV431.
The company says CRV431, an inhibitor of a family of proteins called cyclophilins, significantly decreased the extend of scarring in a second animal (mouse) model of liver fibrosis.
Intercept Pharmaceuticals’ (NASDAQ:ICPT) obeticholic acid was used as a comparator, failing to demonstrate a decrease in fibrosis.
The study was conducted at the Scripps Research Institute.
Development is ongoing.

InflRx cut to Neutral from Outperform by Baird

Target $58 to $6

2019 opportunities for pharma

While it is fair to say that the global pharmaceutical market is under enormous pressure, there are also numerous opportunities arising from new innovations and major changes to the global market.
In this article we look at five key areas that pharma will harness for success over the next year and beyond.
1) Further roll-out of cell therapy
2019 will be the year when cell and gene therapies, the leading edge of the next generation biologic therapies, are here to stay as a commercial proposition.
Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA Commissioner, stated that the number of Investigational New Drugs (INDs) for cell and gene therapies will likely pass 400 in 2019 and then pass 800 before 2021. As next generation biologic therapies launch, cutting edge science must meet commercial reality, highlighting the considerable differences in treatment logistics, funding, evaluation and outcomes these treatments will have to previous pharmaceutical technologies.
The biggest challenge will be cost. These pioneer therapies are establishing at a time of slowing growth in innovative product sales opportunity in the developed world. Novartis has already laid out its plans for rolling out Kymriah to China, which has historically been a challenging market to get significant uptake for any innovative therapies, and Novartis has also announced it will be working on bringing manufacturing costs down to drive improved access.
Another big determinant of whether clinical promise will be realised is whether savings can be made in other, older parts of the pharmaceutical market. This savings will need to be substantial and critical for 2019 will be how savings from biosimilars play out.
2) Focus on biosimilars
In a low growth pharmaceutical market, innovation can only realise its full potential if older parts of the market lose exclusivity and become less expensive. Small molecule brands saw a wave of major genericisations from 2011, and the cost savings impacts have since been exhausted within that category. Since the 2015 launch of biosimilar infliximab, the focus of cost savings potential has moved to the older biologics.
Biosimilars have been available for more than a decade in Europe, have approval pathways and are launched in the largest biologic market, the US, as well as within a growing number of other countries. Nevertheless, the current value of biosimilar pathway approved products is only $7.3bn, pre-rebates and discounts. There’s still a substantial way to go, and therefore focus in 2019 will be on the impact of a biosimilar Humira (adalimumab).
While the European loss of exclusivity for Humira (adalimumab) occurred in 2018, the full impact of this event will be realised in 2019. Humira is currently the largest selling prescription medicine in the world, and one of the top five highest selling medicines of all time, making this the largest ever biosimilar opportunity, and the litmus test for whether biosimilars truly will provide substantive cost savings for healthcare systems seeking relief from inexorable budget pressures.
In November 2018 the UK’s NHS announced it would expect to save £300m of drug spend in England by deals with five biosimilars manufacturers on biosimilar adalimumab as Humira went off patent – clearly expecting that many patients would switch to the biosimilar very rapidly. Will these potential savings translate into greater spend on innovation within the UK and other countries?
The European experience is a harbinger for the real opportunity – the US market. Biosimilars entered the US late because of a slower-to-establish regulatory framework. Now that biosimilar pathways are present within the US, their impact has been patchy. The 2019 European biosimilar adalimumab experience will be a rehearsal for 2023, when Humira loses exclusivity in the US.
3) A new era for Chinese regulation
This year will usher in a new era for the Chinese market, a shift of market value in favour of innovation and specialty.
IQVIA’s MIDAS data shows that China, alongside all the other key emerging countries, has historically contributed very little to the first five years of new innovation’s global sales, even allowing for later Chinese launch, a consequence of an underfunded and inefficient China Food and Drug Administration.
In 2018, the newly formed National Medicines Products Administration (NMPA) approved a record 48 new products, fast-tracked because those medicines had already been approved within the US and Europe. It’s projected that in 2019 we will see an acceleration of this major change to the Chinese pharmaceutical environment, which, as China is the world’s second largest market, will have far reaching global consequences.
Chinese reforms on their medicines and clinical trials regulation will make it easier to set up clinical trials in China, speed the approval of medicines and encourage the approval of innovative new medicines.
Innovation will increasingly come from Chinese origin companies. Innovative approvals must still be combined with effective funding to improve uptake and commercial return. The sharp rise in private medical insurance is one solution to this. The other is the same as in developed markets: reduce spend on what is older and off patent.
China has had non-original biologics before, but early 2019 saw the launch of the first “true” biosimilar. Extremely tough tendering processes could encourage the uptake of lowest cost generics in multi-source markets, targeting the older brands which are a cornerstone of much multinational Chinese business.
“Real world data is limited by the lack of widely agreed and accepted standards to generate and trust across regulators and health technology assessors”
The circumstances are right for the world’s second largest pharmaceutical market to see substantial change. China is number two in world rankings for overall pharma market size, but number 30 in world rankings for new innovative medicine spend. Substantial improvement in ranking would help reduce the global pharmaceutical market’s over-dependence on the US.
4) Real world data expands its range
Real world data (RWD) regarding the use and outcomes of prescription medicines has an established and important role in the uptake and use of medicines. The range of RWD that can be used will shortly undergo substantial expansion from the core of traditional patient records.
Upstream, 2019 will see expansion of RWD at the high science end, with increasing volume of de-identified genomic/biomarker data collected, available and, most importantly, integrated with non-identified patient records. This allows very powerful insights into the role genetics play in treatment outcomes.
Downstream, non or de-identified patient-generated data, for example from wearables, apps or smart devices, are increasing in volume. Simultaneously, software, including natural language processing to analyse this unstructured, complex data and generate meaning is also improving significantly.
RWD expands its range and utility, but in contrast to clinical trial data, it is limited by the lack of widely agreed and accepted standards and protocols to generate consensus and trust across regulators and health technology assessors. This is likely to change in 2019 as proposals for how a consensus standard might work are discussed.
5) Digital within a multichannel approach to HCP engagement
Digital technologies have transformed how healthcare professionals receive information and communicate on pharmacotherapies, and a significant proportion of that shift deals with their engagement with pharmaceutical companies.
Digital promotion has allowed pharma to reduce costs, increase communication reach and engagement, and create a more flexible and personalised approach to their audiences.
However, the multichannel marketing revolution has not been uniform across key markets: promotional audits show that Europe significantly lagged the US and Japan in volume share of digital promotional activity to doctors. Whilst digital does not automatically equal multichannel, it is a marker of multichannel maturity.
Last year saw the gap between the percentage of pharma promotional activity (in volume) that’s digital (average 15% across the five major markets) and the percentage of doctors that state they prefer digital channels of communication from pharma (average 21% across the five major markets) narrow. We believe 2019 could be the year when the gap closes.
Exciting times
The pressures in the global pharmaceutical market have in some cases been building for decades.
Pressures such as addressing the significance of the US market, or managing R&D costs and complexities are not going to resolve in a week, but 2019 shows the seeds of change in a new direction for China, the world’s second largest market, digital technology driven rapid evolution of approaches to managing clinical development, real world data collection and use, and even the nature of the therapeutic innovation under development.
Combine this with ongoing efforts to address costs via biosimilars and fund truly exciting new pharmacotherapies, and the wild cards of Brexit and M&A, and the second half of 2019 could be an exciting time to be in the pharmaceutical industry.

ChemoCentryx target cut to $17 from $24 by Raymond James

Maintains Strong Buy

Health Insurance Innovations acquires direct-to-consumer platform

Health Insurance Innovations (NASDAQ:HIIQ) has acquired TogetherHealth, a direct-to-consumer platform aimed at the “over 65” insurance market.
Under the terms of the deal, HIIQ paid ~$50M in cash plus 630K shares of Class A common stock. It also included a five-year earnout provision.
The transaction will add at least $10M to HIIQ’s 2019 non-GAAP EBITDA.
Updated 2019 guidance: revenues: $450M – 460M from $430M – 440M; non-GAAP EBITDA: $82M – 87M from $72M – 77M; non-GAAP EPS: $3.80 – 4.05 from $3.50 – 3.75.
The company has established a new $215M credit facility that includes a $150M term loan and a $65M revolver. The term loan will fund the refinancing of $65M of existing debt and the cash portion of the transaction.
Management will host a conference call this morning at 9:00 am ET to discuss the deal.
Shares are up 6% premarket on light volume.

AMA witness tells judge CVS-Aetna merger creates big competitive concerns

  • Neeraj Sood made the American Medical Association’s case against the CVS-Aetna merger on Tuesday as the first witness to testify at an evidentiary hearing before Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Nood is health policy professor and vice dean for research at the University of Southern California Sol Price School of Public Policy.
  • The AMA has filed papers objecting to the union of the two companies. On Wednesday, Leon will hear from witnesses for CVS and the government. The hearing is set to wrap up Thursday.
  • Though the CVS-Aetna deal closed last year, Leon has yet to give his blessing to the settlement agreement and has said he has significant concerns about the merger’s effects on competition. This hearing will help him decide. It is the first time witness testimony will be taken in Tunney Act proceedings.

The government’s settlement agreement with CVS over its merger with Aetna required Aetna to sell off its Medicare Part D prescription drug plans (PDP) to rival WellCare. But Sood told the judge the divestiture won’t solve the anticompetitive concerns raised by the merger.
Leon is tasked with reviewing the settlement under the Tunney Act, which gives courts the power to review DOJ decisions. That law gives him significant discretion to determine if the settlement is in the public interest.
Leon has been skeptical of the CVS-Aetna deal struck with DOJ. He previously said the settlement addresses only “about one-tenth of 1%” of the nearly $70 billion mega-merger.
“In assessing whether or not the merger is in the public interest or not, which is my job, should I limit myself to the PDP market or should I look to the entities that are going to impact the greater market?,” the judge asked Sood, the first of six witnesses to testify at the hearing.
“That is a very loaded question,” Sood told the judge. But he told Leon the effects of the merger would go beyond the PDP market and affect the broader healthcare market. Among the likely effects he said would be increased premiums and increased government subsidies to enrollees’ Part D premiums.
The sell-off of the Aetna PDPs to WellCare won’t solve the anti-competitive effects of the deal as the government contends, Sood told the judge.
The merger means the loss of Aetna, “a very strong competitor” from the PDP market and the resulting loss of head-to-head competition between Aetna and CVS, Sood told the judge. And, Sood said, WellCare is not equipped to step into Aetna’s shoes.
“WellCare is a much weaker competitor than Aetna,” lacking Aetna’s brand recognition, economies of scale and larger subscriber base, Sood testified. Aetna’s total PDP subscribers totaled approximately 2.2 million, Sood said. WellCare has half that with approximately 1.1 million standalone Medicare Part D PDP members.
“No matter how strong WellCare gets, there will still be significant competitive concerns,” Sood said, noting WellCare gets its pharmacy benefit management (PBM) services from CVS itself.  This means CVS has the ability to increase costs or otherwise disadvantage WellCare. In addition, he said, WellCare is unlikely to be able to retain all of Aetna’s customers, he said.
Witnesses for the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and U.S. PIRG and Consumer Action were also scheduled to testify about the negative effects of the merger on Tuesday. Witnesses for the government and CVS are scheduled to testify Wednesday.
Meanwhile, WellCare may itself be the subject of an antitrust probe as it is planning to merge with Centene, the leader in Medicaid managed care plans in the country. The American Hospital Association wrote to the U.S. Department of Justice asking for a thorough review of the deal, which it said “threatens to reduce competition in delivery of Medicaid Managed Care and Medicare Advantage services to tens of millions of consumers across broad swaths of the country.”

Dario Health started at Buy at Craig-Hallum

Target $1.50