Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

Using a Fitbit and music to counteract insomnia

Lots of people like to listen to music at bedtime. With the advent of the portable music player and in-ear headphones, this phenomenon has become widespread. Of course, music can help improve our state of mind and perhaps even help those who suffer from insomnia to get to sleep. The downside is that once you have fallen asleep the music will keep playing and this might have detrimental effects on how deeply you sleep afterwards and perhaps even cause issues in terms of damage to hearing.
Research published in the International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics offers a novel solution to defeating insomnia with but without the risk to one’s . Shriram Vasudevan, Ikram Shah, Sriharsha Patallapalli, S. Karthikeyan, S. Subhash Chandran, and U. Adithya Bharadwaj of Amrita University, Coimbatore, India are the team behind the new approach. Their wearable, Fitbit, based system allows one to nod off while listening to music but once one has actually fallen asleep the music is muted. This team says means there should be no disturbance of normal sleep patterns caused by the music continuing to play and no risk to hearing.
Fundamentally, their monitors the data from the Fitbit and calculates when the person has most likely fallen to sleep so that the music can be muted without disturbing them. Of course, many sleepers set a timer on their music to switch it off within a few minutes or an hour or so, but that only has benefits if one has actually fallen asleep. The monitored approach means the music only stops once the user is fast asleep.

Explore further
Watching music move through the brain

Study identifies brain protein that could put the brakes on Alzheimer’s

University of California, Irvine biologists blazing new approaches to studying Alzheimer’s disease have made a major finding on combating inflammation linked to the disease. The School of Biological Sciences researchers’ discovery about the role of a protein called TOM-1 heralds a shift toward examining the molecular underpinnings of Alzheimer’s processes.
Their study appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“Scientists have known for a long time that inflammation is a driver of Alzheimer’s , but inflammation is complex and involves many factors,” said School of Biological Sciences Dean Frank LaFerla, Ph.D., whose laboratory conducted the research. “That’s why we decided to look at TOM-1.
The protein helps to regulate a key component of the inflammatory response. “We were interested in TOM-1 because its levels are low in the Alzheimer’s brain and in the brains of Alzheimer’s rodent models,” said Alessandra Martini, Ph.D., the paper’s first author and a postdoctoral researcher who worked with LaFerla. “However, its specific role in the disease has largely been unexplored.”
The scientists discovered that reducing the amount of TOM-1 in Alzheimer’s rodent models increased pathology, which included increased , and exacerbated cognitive problems associated with the disease. Restoring TOM-1 levels reversed those effects.
“You can think of TOM-1 as being like the brakes of a car, and the brakes aren’t working for people with Alzheimer’s,” LaFerla said. “This research shows that fixing the brakes at the could provide an entirely new therapeutic avenue. With millions of people affected by Alzheimers and the numbers growing, we must research a diverse portfolio of approaches so we can one day vanquish this terrible disease.”

Explore further
Potential target for diabetes-associated Alzheimer’s disease

More information: Alessandra Cadete Martini et al. Amyloid-beta impairs TOM1-mediated IL-1R1 signaling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914088116

New protocol allows prescribing anticancer meds outside approved use

A large team of researchers affiliated with institutions across the Netherlands has begun what they call a Drug Rediscovery protocol—a clinical trial of sorts that involves giving cancer patients anticancer drugs that are not typically used for their type of cancer. In their paper published in the journal Nature, the group describes their protocol and its purpose.
Doctors who treat patients know that sometimes drugs developed for treating one type of cancer can effectively treat other types of cancer—but a system for identifying which drugs those might be has not been developed. In this new effort, the doctors and researchers on the project are seeking to remedy that problem. They have set up a protocol whereby cancer patients who are out of options are given a chance to try other drugs not approved for their type of cancer. They report that initial results are promising—up to one-third of patients given alternative remedies have seen some improvement from them—and two are in remission.
Such a protocol is possible because of the way modern cancer drugs are developed—most are precision anti-cancer therapies directed against a specific DNA mutation in a tumor. Thus, to choose an alternative drug, a doctor working under the Drug Rediscovery protocol would look up a drug that has been approved for treating a similar type of mutation. As an example, many drugs have been developed and approved for treating that have been designed to target mutations that result in overproduction of HER2. If a patient in the program has a cancer type that also results in overproduction of HER2, it might be wise to allow them to try it as well.
The researchers in the program note that very little information is available for doctors trying to treat dying with drugs outside of approved lists. They believe that a protocol such as theirs will generate results that can be used by other doctors. If a patient experiences good results with an alternative drug, it goes into the database. If none of the patients given a certain see any improvement, then the team can cross it off a list of possible therapies for a certain kind of cancer.
The researchers report that the protocol now has over 1000 patients, and they hope to expand it by connecting with similar programs taking place in other countries. They note that as more data goes into the database, the better the database will become at providing reasonable alternatives for cancer doctors.

Explore further
Zhang group identifies gene that may make TNBC cells vulnerable to existing

More information: D. L. van der Velden et al. The Drug Rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs, Nature (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1600-x

Childhood TB shot may offer long-term protection from lung cancer

A tuberculosis vaccine commonly used in other parts of the world might reduce a person’s risk of developing lung cancer if given early in childhood, a six-decade-long study reports.
The Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the only vaccine approved for preventing tuberculosis (TB)—a potentially fatal infectious disease that typically attacks the lungs. Because TB risk is low in the United States, the vaccine isn’t often given to American children, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
But the new study suggests the vaccine may have some positive side effects.
“BCG-vaccinated participants had a significant 2.5-fold lower rate of cancer,” said study senior author Dr. Naomi Aronson, director of infectious diseases at Uniformed Services University in Bethesda, Md.
She said lower lung cancer rates persisted in those who received the vaccine no matter where they lived, and whether they smoked, drank alcohol or had tuberculosis.
Aronson said BCG affects the immune system somehow and may provide even more benefit in the lungs.
The initial study was conducted in 3,000 American Indian and Alaska Native children in the 1930s. If the findings are confirmed in different groups, Aronson said the use of BCG vaccine in childhood “might be considered for risk reduction for lung cancer over a lifetime.”
Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, interim chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, reviewed the study and called the findings fascinating. “And you rarely see this duration of follow-up,” he added. “The authors went to great lengths to validate their information.”
But, he said, it’s unlikely that BCG will be used for lung cancer prevention. While the study found a statistically significant reduction in the rate of lung cancer, the actual number of cases was very low. Just 42 people in the study were diagnosed with lung cancer.
There’s also a serious, ongoing shortage of BCG vaccine that would limit any such efforts, Lichtenfeld said. The vaccine is an for a certain type of bladder cancer, and doctors find it hard to get enough for that purpose.
In addition, the BCG vaccine has been tested as a treatment in a number of other cancers with mixed results. In some cases, it looked as if lesions had shrunk, but the vaccine didn’t prolong survival, he explained.
Plus, Lichtenfeld said, there’s a very effective way to prevent many cases of lung cancer—don’t smoke. And, if you do, quit. “Tobacco causes most, but not all lung cancers. Not smoking helps prevent many cancers,” he said.
The initial study was conducted between 1935 and 1938. About 3,000 children from nine American Indian and Alaska Native tribes at multiple U.S. sites were randomly given the BCG vaccine or a placebo.
None of the youngsters had had tuberculosis. They were vaccinated between 5 and 11 years of age, with a median age of 8 years. Half were younger when they got the shot, half were older.
From 1992 to 1998, researchers reviewed health information from the trial participants.
There was no statistically significant differences in overall cancer rates between the vaccine and placebo groups. But the odds of lung were significantly lower, the study found.
Researchers noted that is a leading cause of death for Alaska Natives and Native Americans.
The study was published Sept. 25 in the journal JAMA Open.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-10-childhood-tb-shot-long-term-lung.html

How microbes hack into cells and why cancer drugs might block them


The lowdown on how microbes hack into cells -- and why cancer drugs might stop them
Credit: A. KITTERMAN, Science Signaling {2019) DOI: 10.1126/scisignal

No matter the pathogen—virus, bacterium or fungus—many “pick a specific type of lock” on the surface of cells, which allows the microbe to break and enter into the inner sanctum of the host’s genome.
In a sweeping analysis on how microbes hack into cells and commandeer them, Australian microbiologists say they are also uncovering mechanisms in common between microbes and . Their research suggests that in the not-too-distant future it may be possible to cure infectious diseases with repurposed , medications that can function across a broad range of pathogens, eliminating the need for antibiotics, antivirals and antifungals.
An ultimate hope, these scientists say, is ushering in the era of anti-infectives, drugs that block a vulnerable port of entry for infectious agents.
Writing in the journal Science Signaling, Dr. Gholamreza Haqshenas of Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute in Australia, and Dr. Christian Doerig, also of Monash, as well as RMIT University in Australia, say a radically diverse group of pathogens have surprisingly evolved to subvert cells in a sly way.
While there are numerous pathways to infection, many microbes enter their hosts by hijacking signaling proteins, a finding that has become increasingly clear in recent years, Haqshenas and Doerig say.
Signaling proteins are molecules that are responsible for sending messages within and between cells. These proteins have segments above and below the cell surface, which are critical to cellular function. So it should come as no surprise, the Australian team says, that microbes responsible for some of the most serious infections have targeted a superfamily of signaling molecules—receptor tyrosine kinases—as their route into the host’s cellular domain.
Haqshenas said a vast range of pathogens have evolved mechanisms to hack into cells by targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, or RTKs. These microbes can bind to the receptor and like a safe cracker, “unlock” the cell.
“To name some important ones: Hepatitis C and ,” Haqshenas told Medical Xpress. “Among bacteria, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes; and among fungi, Candida albicans.”
When a bacterium, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae binds to a receptor tyrosine kinase protein on a cell’s surface, the pathogen not only commandeers the cell, it stimulates signaling, the messages that control the cell. The pathogen assumes command of everything including the cell’s structure, its cytoskeleton, thereby easing its entry into the cell.
The RTK superfamily, which has about 58 members, function as the cell receptors for numerous biological growth factors, such as , platelet-derived and , to name a few. These factors are like keys that once bound to the receptor can unlock it and enter the cell. An overabundance of RTKs occurs in some cancers, which can lead to cancer progression. RTK blockers, medications referred to as small-molecule drugs, have been developed to treat a form of leukemia and a rare intestinal cancer, which are marked by excessive RTKs. Gleevec was the first developed in this class and was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration nearly two decades ago.
Although Haqshenas and Doerig report that a veritable rogue’s gallery of viruses can commandeer as an entryway into cells, Doerig underscored “there are other mechanisms of entry for some bacteria.”
Pathogens that use the RTK route to infection have evolved specialized mechanisms that have allowed them to hack their way into host cells via this passageway.
For example, Chikungunya, Ebola, Eastern equine encephalitis and Japanese encephalitis viruses enter cells via RTKs. In addition, cytomegalovirus, dengue, 1, , Lassa, Marburg, respiratory syncytial, yellow fever, West Nile and Zika viruses break and enter through the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway.
The list is longer still, according to Haqshenas and Doerig, who say it also includes Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis, Rose River and vaccinia viruses, pathogens that also preferentially hack their way into host cells by unlocking RTKs.
“The commonality of relying on the same RTKs suggests that selective inhibitors against specific RTKs may have broad spectrum anti-infective properties. Definitely worth further investigation,” Doerig said.
Haqshenas likewise sees their new analysis as a springboard to further research that explores the possibility of using existing drugs in new ways against infectious agents.
“Our review highlights the importance of RTKs in the biology of many pathogens of importance to public health,” Haqshenas said. “Currently, RTKs are common targets of anti-cancer drugs. The review highlights that FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs can be repurposed for the treatment of infections caused by a wide range of that must enter host to complete their life cycle.
“This approach will significantly reduce the cost of anti-infective drug development, and, because a cellular protein is targeted, it reduces the chance of drug resistance,” Haqshenas said.

Explore further
Study points to new approach to battling infections

More information: Gholamreza Haqshenas et al. Targeting of host cell receptor tyrosine kinases by intracellular pathogens, Science Signaling {2019) DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aau9894

Stifel Bullish On Iovance And Fate Therapeutics, Neutral On Bluebird Bio

Stifel initiated coverage on a trio of oncology-focused biotechs Tuesday, recommending buying two and staying sidelined on a third.

The Analyst

Benjamin Burnett initiated coverage of:
bluebird bio Inc NASDAQ: BLUE) with a Hold rating and $109 price target.
Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc NASDAQ: IOVA) with a Buy rating and $27 price target
Fate Therapeutics Inc FATE 4.76% with a Buy rating and $27 price target

Gene Therapy Launch, Multiple Myeloma Uncertainty Temper Optimism On Bluebird

The slow launch anticipated for Zynteglo, bluebird bio’s gene therapy to treat transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, and competitive programs imparting uncertainty to its multiple myeloma market have left Stifel wary of bluebird bio.
These concerns are likely to be mitigated by a neutral stance on Lenti-D in cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, an inherited neurological disorder, and Burnett’s confidence in the company’s ability to churn out new assets, providing further diversification for the longer term.

Blockbuster Potential For Iovance’s TIL Product In Melanoma, Cervical Cancer

The market opportunity for an autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in advanced melanoma/cervical cancer settings could reach a peak of more than $2 billion, Burnett said.
The analyst said he expects the upcoming pivotal readouts to be positive. Additionally, the competitive landscape appears to be favorable for Iovance, he said.

Stifel Likes Setup Into FT500, FT516 Data Readouts

The data readout on Fate’s iPSC-derived NK cell cancer immunotherapy FT500 due later this year is likely to validate the safety of the iPSC-derived NK cell platform, Burnett said.
The analyst is also positive about the potential for FT516 to generate competitive efficacy data in acute myeloid leukemia.
“Additionally, we also believe the cadence of INDs, two within the next 6-9 months, will further drive enthusiasm for the platform while diversifying the company’s opportunity set within oncology.”
https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/19/10/14523033/stifel-bullish-on-iovance-and-fate-therapeutics-neutral-on-bluebird-bio

Esmo 2019 – Clovis is running out of waves to catch

In prostate cancer Clovis could be adopting a more realistic regulatory stance with its Parp than Astrazeneca and Merck & Co. In the long run will it matter much?

Amid much fanfare around successful pivotal trials of Lynparza and Zejula at this year’s Esmo Congress, Clovis Oncology struggled to get much attention for its own Parp inhibitor, Rubraca, despite also presenting registrational data. The situation echoes the larger reality here: as a small fish in this particular pond, Clovis is struggling to compete.
The small biotech’s main reveal at Esmo was the full Triton2 dataset, on which Rubraca will be filed for accelerated approval in a third-line prostate cancer setting. A look at the developing results from Parp inhibitors in this tumour type suggests that Rubraca is just as effective as its rivals – caveats notwithstanding – while Clovis’s focus on patients with BRCA mutations seems an arguably more realistic regulatory strategy than Astrazenca’s (Esmo 2019 – A place for Parps in prostate cancer, September 30, 2019).
The potential presence of Lynparza on the market in an earlier setting than Rubraca is ultimately the more important point here – Astra’s Profound trial was conducted in a second-line setting – and there is little evidence to support retreating patients with a Parp inhibitor. But, should Astra and Merck’s determination to seek approval in a broader patient group slow Lynparza’s progress with regulators, Clovis might achieve a few more months alone on the market.
Cross-trial analysis of Parp inhibitors in prostate cancer, by genetic mutation type

Lynparza: Profound (P3, 2nd-line )  Rubraca: Triton2 (P2; 3rd-line) Zejula: Galahad (P2; 3rd-line)* Lynparza: Toparp-b (P2; 3rd-line)
Mutation type ORR (n) ORR (n) ORR (n) ORR (n)
BRCA1/2
44% (25/57) 41% (12/29) 52% (11/21)
ATM
10% (2/21) 9% (2/22) [Result in all other gene types combined] 8% (1/12)
BRCA1/2 +ATM 33% (84/256) 35% (27/78)** 36% (12/33)**
CDK12
0 (0/9) 0% (0/18)
CHEK2
0 (0/5)
PALB2
n/a 33% (2/6)
Other
39% (5/13) 0% (0/17)
*Galahad selected for patients with biallelic mutations only, though this is no longer considered relevant in predicting response to a Parp inhibitor. **Calculated by Vantage. ORR=objective response rate. Source: Esmo 2019 presentations, Asco 2019 for Toparp-B.
A look at the data on Parp inhibitors in prostate cancer shows that these agents have generated roughly similar response rates, in patients with BRCA1 and 2 mutations. This gene is associated with the strongest responses to Parp inhibition, although other mutations related to homologous recombination repair (HRR) mechanisms are thought to confer sensitivity – a hypothesis that was most definitively confirmed in ovarian cancer over the weekend.
In prostate cancer, however, the role of other genes is far less clear. This is why Astrazeneca’s assertion that it will seek approval in all patients with HRR associated genes is controversial; on an investor call yesterday executives left little doubt that this was in fact their intention.
“We designed Profound specifically with the intention that, if both cohorts were positive, we would be seeking a label in the HRRm population,” said Dave Fredrickson, head of oncology for Astrazeneca.
Exploratory gene-by-gene analysis from Profound.
M Hussain, Esmo 2019 Profound presentation.
Very little breakdown of response by gene mutation type was given at Esmo – Astra said this analysis is still being undertaken – although it is clear that regulators will think hard about a broad label. The ATM cohort is important because these patients were combined with BRCA1/2 patients for the primary analysis of Profound; while these patients seem to respond to Lynparza, very similar responses were seen in the control group, which was either Zytiga or Xtandi.
Clovis also enrolled these patients in Triton2, but Pat Mahaffy, its chief executive, made it clear that the company had no expectation of approval in this subset.
“It’s a little early to speculate on the label, but it will be limited to BRCA mutants,” he told investors on a call over the weekend.
Given that Clovis desperately needs to get Rubraca to market before Lynparza, not stretching the data too far here is probably wise. Particularly as the company’s chances to catch up are fairly distant: pivotal, second-line prostate cancer data are unlikely to emerge before 2022.
In ovarian cancer the company is also lagging: a phase III study testing Rubraca in combination with Opdivo, in a front-line maintenance setting, are slated for 2024.
Sellside forecasts from EvaluatePharma show the Parp market growing strongly, and it is estimated to be worth $5.7bn by 2024. But Rubraca numbers have been falling, along with Clovis’s valuation; its market cap now sits at a mere $215m, after plunging 87% in the last 12 months. A long-rumoured takeout of the company is looking ever more unlikely, particularly since any buyer could presumably pay considerably less in another 12 months.
A changing outlook for the Parp market
Product Company 2020e ($m) 2024e ($m) 12-mth change in 2024 forecast
Lynparza Astrazeneca 1,518 2,871 22%
Zejula Glaxosmithkline 497 1,232 13%
Rubraca Clovis Oncology 217 788 -52%
Talzenna Pfizer 103 354 -72%
Total market incl. others 2,353 5,746
Source: EvaluatePharma.
https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/events/conferences/esmo-2019-clovis-running-out-waves-catch