Federal regulators and health tech startups are increasingly at odds over the permissibility of at-home testing for
Covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
Two companies told STAT this week that their tests were cleared for
patients to take at home — including one that said it has already
processed thousands of tests. The companies insist they are permitted to
sell the tests because they are ordered by physicians and processed in
certified labs. The FDA, however, remains adamant that isn’t the case.
“FDA has not authorized any Covid-19 tests for home use, including
home collection. Any tests that are intended to be used completely at
home or have a sample collected at home and sent for analysis would need
authorization by the agency,” an FDA spokesperson said in a statement
this week.
Two of the companies selling tests that let customers collect saliva
samples at home are MicroGen DX and Vault Health.* MicroGen DX told STAT
it did not require FDA approval for its test — which launched on March
31 and costs $99 — because it uses an accredited lab to process the
results, and because all patients do to collect a sample is spit into a
cup. Vault Health said its test — which is set to launch on April 13 and
will cost $150 — was “provisionally cleared,” requires a clinician’s
sign-off, and anyone who takes it must do so with virtual oversight from
a practitioner via Zoom. Vault’s test involves having patients spit
into a tube.
The companies’ thinking appears similar to the initial arguments from the previous smattering of startups who
launched at-home coronavirus tests
that used throat and nasal swabs last month — all of whom have now
stopped selling the tests. Those companies included telemedicine startup
Nurx, primary care company Carbon Health, and at-home testing startups
Everlywell and LetsGetChecked. Federal regulators swiftly
updated their guidance to clarify that no at-home test for Covid-19 had been approved.
But while those companies keep
their plans on hold,
Vault Health and MicroGen DX are moving forward with their tests.
Executives from both companies said they were initially unclear on how
the FDA would regulate their tests. The guidelines for coronavirus
testing have shifted rapidly, and in some cases the wording of the rules
appear to be in conflict, leading to different interpretations.
In part, the confusion could stem from distinct interpretations of
exactly which agency would regulate coronavirus tests that allow people
to collect samples on their own. The FDA is asserting that coronavirus
tests are regulated as individual diagnostic tests, something it
oversees. The manufacturers seem to believe that their tests fall under a
different purview regulated by a separate agency, the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services. The discord resembles the early market
for consumer genetic tests, such as those made by 23andMe a decade ago.
In that case, 23andMe’s health-related tests were eventually forced off
the market.
“FDA’s position for 30 years has been, ‘We can regulate these tests
and there’s some historical reasons we don’t regulate, but we can reach
in and regulate if we need to,’” said James Boiani, a member of the law
firm Epstein Becker Green who specializes in FDA and CLIA legal and
regulatory matters.
“They did reach in with genetic tests and they’re doing the same with the Covid home tests,” he added.
Both companies said that based on their latest interactions with the
agency, they felt confident that their tests were green-lit.
“We don’t need FDA approval. We’re a high-complexity lab,” said Rick
Martin, the chief executive officer of MicroGen DX, referencing that the
company’s tests are processed in a CLIA-certified lab. Martin said his
company’s lab had processed 7,000 tests as of April 10.
When pressed about the FDA’s statement that the agency had not
approved any coronavirus tests that involve home sample collection,
Martin said that didn’t matter because patients were merely spitting
into a cup to take the test.
“FDA said no tests had been approved for collection. Well, I don’t
care if I get on their approved list,” Martin said, adding, “Once I have
a validated test, it’s between a patient and a clinician where they
collect the sample.”
Jason Feldman, Vault Health’s chief executive officer, said Vault
Health’s medical team was “confident” that there is no difference
between being physically present in a clinician’s office for a
coronavirus test and collecting a saliva sample at home with a
physician’s guidance.
“It’s not an at-home test. It’s a physician ordered, practitioner-monitored, physician-reported test,” Feldman said.
*The test being offered by Vault is developed by Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory.
Startups spar with FDA over what constitutes a home coronavirus test
As one page:
