Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

Giant leap in diagnosing liver disease

Chronic liver disease represents a major global public health problem affecting an estimated 844 million people, according to the World Health Organization. It is among the top causes of mortality in Australia, the UK and the United States. At the same time, it is both difficult to manage and there is no FDA-approved anti-fibrotic liver therapy. The microbiome–a complex collection of microbes that inhabit the gut–may be an unexpected indictor of health. Now, a collaborative team of Salk Institute and UC San Diego scientists have created a novel microbiome-based diagnostic tool that, with the accuracy of the best physicians, quickly and inexpensively identifies liver fibrosis and cirrhosis over 90 percent of the time in human patients.
The non-invasive method relies on an algorithm to analyze patient stool samples–which contains traces of what lives in the gut–and could lead to improved patient care and treatment outcomes for liver disease, as detailed online on June 30, 2020 in Cell Metabolism.
“The microbiome is a dynamic living sensor of small changes in health and disease in the body, and as such, it provides an accurate readout of body health,” says Salk Professor Ronald Evans, co-corresponding author and holder of the March of Dimes Chair. “Because this diagnostic is fast and low-cost, it could be something that becomes widely used, especially in the many areas that lack specialty clinics and physicians. Simply said, it could be a real game changer, with world-wide implications.”
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease globally and can progress to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and potentially cancer, as the liver starts to experience scarring and cell death. But diagnostic tools for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are lacking. Biopsies are invasive and can miss injured regions of the liver, and MRIs are expensive and are often not available in rural areas. To address these challenges, the research team explored the microbiome as a way to meet the urgent need for a new test to identify patients at risk.
“We sought to develop a universal, non-invasive test for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis based on a ‘microbiome signature’ of the disease,” says Michael Downes, a Salk senior staff scientist and co-author of the study.
In collaboration with scientists from the UC San Diego Department of Medicine, the team optimized a computational method called machine learning to uncover a complex disease signature based on 19 bacterial species present in the stool samples of a patient group. The signature is made up of the different quantities of bacteria, creating a universal fingerprint for identifying liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. The study included 163 clinical samples from both healthy as well as sick family members to identify variables that were indicative of liver disease.
Using data from microbiome genetic profiling and from metabolites from the stool samples, the researchers discovered a microbiome signature that was associated with a cirrhosis diagnosis with 94 percent accuracy. The microbiome signature could also determine the stage of liver fibrosis, which could allow doctors to grade patients based on their stage of the disease and improve treatment strategies.
“These findings demonstrate that it is possible to use machine learning to identify a universal signature that can be used for accurate diagnosis of a disease, such as liver cirrhosis,” says Tae Gyu Oh, first author of the paper and a postdoctoral researcher in the Evans lab. “The patterns we found reflect the complexity of the microbiome and how gut health likely affects disease.”
The researchers then applied their microbiome signature to two independent populations of patients from China and Italy. The team’s signature could accurately identify cirrhosis in over 90 percent of patients, which validates the power and accuracy of the algorithm across different genetics and diets.
“It is remarkable that a gut microbiome signature derived from patients residing in Southern California for cirrhosis was able to predict cirrhosis in two independent cohorts residing in China and Italy. It speaks to the new discoveries that are yet to be realized in the role of the gut microbiome to diagnose and risk-stratify liver disease,” says Rohit Loomba, co-corresponding author and director of the NAFLD Research Center at the UC San Diego School of Medicine. “I think the power of using the microbiome as a diagnostic tool is only starting to be realized.”
In the future, the scientists will examine the causal link between the microbiome and liver disease by testing whether restoring parts of the microbiome leads to regression of the disease or removing certain bacteria makes it worse. The team also hopes this approach can be used to characterize additional diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, colon cancer, Alzheimer’s and other diseases shown to be likely affected by a dysregulated microbiome.
###
Other researchers on the paper were Ting Fu, Ruth T. Yu and Annette R. Atkins of Salk; Susy M. Kim, Cyrielle Caussy, Shirin Bassirian, Seema Singh, Egbert V. Madamba, Ricki Bettencourt, Lisa Richards, Manuela Raffatellu, Pieter C. Dorrestein, David A. Brenner, Claude B. Sirlin and Rob Knight of UC San Diego; and Jian Guo and Tao Huan of the University of British Columbia Faculty of Science.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P42ES010337, HL088093, DK057978, HL105278, ES010337); the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; the Salk Institute Cancer Center (CA014195); the NOMIS Foundation; the Fondation Leducq; Public Health Service Grants (AI126277, AI114625, AI145325); the Chiba University-UCSD Center for Mucosal Immunology, Allergy, and Vaccines; the UCSD Department of Pediatrics; the Burroughs Wellcome Fund; NIEHS (5P42ES010337); NCATS (5UL1TR001442); NIDDK (U01DK061734, R01DK106419, P30DK120515, R01DK121378); and DOD PRCRP (W81XWH-18-2-0026).

New Yorkers grow more hesitant about a return to normalcy – poll

New Yorkers continue to report much higher than normal rates of depression and anxiety, but much less than at their peak in mid-April. As they witness the surge in COVID-19 cases in states that re-opened early, New Yorkers have also grown significantly more hesitant about resuming normal activities than they reported in May. Employment and housing worries remain a serious concern for many. These are the major findings of the 13th city and statewide tracking survey from the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH), June 26-28.
As May 2020 began, 65% of New Yorkers said they would see their doctor for a routine visit beginning at the start of the next month. In June, that number dropped to 33%. In early May, 46% said they would go for a haircut starting June 1, but by the end of June, only 33% said they would do so as of July 1. The number who thought they would go to a restaurant after the first of the following month dropped from 31% to 20%. Moreover, a far greater number of respondents now say they plan to wait for a safe and effective vaccine to be widely available before they take part in many routine activities. In May, for example, 31% said they would wait for a vaccine before going to an outdoor concert; in June, nearly twice that number (60%) said they would wait for a vaccine.
Less than a third of respondents believe that public schools (27%) and colleges and universities (31%) should reopen for regular classes in the fall. A majority (54%) do not think the pandemic will end until a vaccine is created.
“People follow the news,” said Dr. Ayman El-Mohandes, Dean of CUNY SPH. “COVID-19 is under better control in New York now, but people see that it is devastating other cities, states and countries, and they do not want to let their guard down. People here also seem to have become resigned to COVID-19. They don’t see the pandemic ending within a finite period of time, instead they link its resolution to the availability of a safe and effective vaccine.”
Serious Economic Pressures Continue for Many
Respondents still face serious economic challenges. One in five respondents (20%) who rent their homes said they would not be able to pay their rent this month, while 10% of homeowners said they would not be able to pay their mortgage. This situation remains unchanged since a mid-April CUNY SPH survey, which reported that 23% of respondents were unable to pay their rent, and 11% were unable to pay their mortgage.
Of those facing difficulties with rent or house payments, 51% believe they will be evicted, and 2% said they have already been evicted. The government’s moratorium on evictions in New York expires on July 6, although some limited protections will remain in place through the end of August.
About one-fourth (26%) of respondents said they had lost their job as a consequence of the pandemic, of whom 46% were terminated and 54% were furloughed. Of those who were terminated, only 54% said they had found another job; of those who were furloughed, only 36% have been asked to return to their previous work.
It is not surprising, then, that more New Yorkers see the economy as worsening (44%) rather than improving (28%). Three in ten respondents remain worried about paying for housing (30%) and more than a quarter (26%) are concerned about employment.
SNAP Numbers Fail to Keep Pace with the Reality of Food Insecurity
About one-third (32%) of the current survey’s respondents report receiving food from SNAP or local non-profit organizations, which is virtually unchanged from late April.
“Despite the determined efforts of public programs to improve access to food assistance, it is disturbing that, four months into the epidemic, less than a third of New Yorkers report receiving such help,” said Nicholas Freudenberg, Distinguished Professor of Public Health and Director of the CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute. “This suggests an ongoing gap, as our survey in late May found that 44% of households were experiencing food insecurity. To reduce the high levels of food insecurity that threaten present and future physical and mental health in New York City, public food programs will need to do more to reach those in need.”
Testing on the Rise
Indicative of a more positive trend, a greater proportion of New Yorkers (42%) reported last weekend that either they or a member of their household has been tested for COVID-19 since March, with three-fourths (75%) of those being tested within the last four weeks. Of this group, 31% reported that the test had been positive, which represents about one in eight (13%) of all the households in the overall survey population. People who reported being tested in previous CUNY SPH surveys were more likely to report testing positive, which suggests that testing was previously being made available only to individuals who appeared to be ill.
Social Issues
About a quarter (26%) of New Yorkers think the coronavirus appears to be a greater threat to the future of the city than racism and police violence (16%). African Americans rated racism slightly higher (20%) and the coronavirus slightly lower (20%) than respondents overall.
However, almost three in five (58%) of all respondents rated the two threats as equal.
Almost three in ten (28%) of respondents said they took part in the recent protests against racism and police brutality, of whom 60% said it was their first time doing so.
Mental Health
Almost half (46%) of respondents report they have not interacted with family and friends outside of their home in the last two weeks, 27% said they have done so once, 21% said two to three times, with 3% reporting four to five times and another 3% reported six times or more.
New Yorkers appear to be habituating to the stress of the pandemic, as mental health symptoms appear to be steadily declining since their peak in mid-April, when mental health risk rates were about 34-44%. Now, only 21% and 28% of New Yorkers are reporting depression and anxiety risks (i.e., experiencing symptoms half of the time in the past two weeks), respectively.
“Increases in social interactions with family and friends, as well as high participation by New Yorkers in social movements, may be buffering the mental health effects of the pandemic,” says Dr. Victoria Ngo, Director of the Center for Innovation in Mental Health at CUNY SPH. “However, only 8% of our latest respondents report that they used free emotional support assistance from city and state resources, like the New York State Office of Mental Health, ThriveNYC, NYCWell, etc. This is worrisome as it suggests that these free resources are not reaching the community.”
Trusted Sources of COVID-19 Information
More than a fourth of New Yorkers reported television news (26%) their most trustworthy source of information about coronavirus, and a similar number (25%) said they trusted the CDC, while 15% said Governor Andrew Cuomo, 10% the WHO, 6% social media, 6% the Trump administration, 5% print news, and 3% family and friends.
The complete survey results and related commentary can be found at https://sph.cuny.edu/research/covid-19-tracking-survey/week-16/ and JHC Impact, an initiative of the Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives.
Survey methodology
The CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH) survey was conducted by Emerson College Polling from June 26-28, 2020 (week 16). This tracking effort started March 13-15 (week 1).
The sample for the NY Statewide and New York City results were both, n=1,000, with a Credibility Interval (CI) similar to a poll’s margin of error (MOE) of +/- 3 percentage points. The data sets were weighted by gender, age, ethnicity, education, and region based on the 2018 1-year American Community Survey model. It is important to remember that subsets based on gender, age, ethnicity, and region carry with them higher margins of error, as the sample size is reduced. In the New York City results, data was collected using an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system of landlines (n=403), SMS-to-online (n=332), and an online panel provided by MTurk and Survey Monkey (n=232). In the Statewide results, data was collected using an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system of landlines (n=404), SMS-to-online (n=329) and an online panel provided by MTurk and Survey Monkey (n=267).
In the statewide survey, regions were broken out into the following:
Region 1: Long Island 14.7% (USC1-4), Shirley, Seaford, Glen Cove, Garden City
Region 2: NYC 45.3% (USC 5-16) Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Staten Island, Bronx
Region 3: Upstate 40% (USC 17-27): Albany, Harrison, Carmel, Rhinebeck, Amsterdam, Schuylerville, Utica, Corning, Irondequoit, Buffalo, Rochester

Health communications principles for the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced unique challenges for public health practitioners and health communicators that warrant an expansion of existing health communication principles to take into consideration.
In an article published Tuesday in Public Health Research & Practice, CUNY SPH Distinguished Lecturer Scott C. Ratzan and colleagues outline a checklist for the implementation of COVID-19 communication strategies to move from the acute phase of the pandemic to the “next normal.”
One of the major challenges that has emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic is the increasing amount of false content circulating on social media platforms. The spread of misinformation relating to a potential vaccine for the disease, even well before a vaccine is available for public use, is particularly concerning, the authors say. Rumours of safety scares and conspiracies relating to a COVID-19 vaccine have swirled throughout social media, leading to social media outlets taking active measures to limit misinformation. These measures, although important, have not prevented a saturated information system nor blocked harmful misinformation from undermining science-backed sources. These features of the media environment and the way people engage with the news call for a revision of the risk communication guidance during a public health crisis.
Ratzan and colleagues identified three general areas of capacity building for health communication during the pandemic: the need for communicators to be proactive and to take preventive actions at times; the importance of planning ahead while also acknowledging the unpredictability of the situation; and the call to focus on people.
The checklist for health communicators is made up of five objectives: set shared goals, establish coordinated response, devise a communication strategy, implement the communication plan, and be ready to adapt.
“We are trying to advance public health with simple innovations to promote evidence-based approaches to stem the COVID-19 pandemic,” says Ratzan. “While we are pleased to publish and disseminate widely, we implore political leaders and governmental officials to adapt these checklists for a healthier populace and COVID-19 recovery.”
It is critical that health communicators worldwide are more proactive in tackling risk communication challenges related to COVID-19, with likely prevention achieved through vaccination and societal COVID-19 resilience, Ratzan says.
###
Ratzan SC, Sommariva S, Rauh L. Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Res Pract. 2020;30(2):e3022010.

CDC: Age Nothing But a Number for COVID-19 Risks

Underlying conditions among people at any age increase risk for severe COVID-19 infection, although varying levels of evidence exist for different conditions, the agency said on Thursday.
Previously, CDC stated adults over age 65 were at higher risk of severe disease, but on a call with reporters, officials advised thinking of age as a “continuum.” They further noted that people of any age with certain underlying medical conditions are at increased risk of severe disease. The agency classified these categories based on strength of evidence.
Populations at risk of severe illness based on the strongest evidence now include those with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity (BMI over 30), any immunosuppressive condition, a history of organ transplant, and type 2 diabetes.
Most substantial changes were among the conditions included in the category of “might increase risk,” where the evidence is weaker. Specifically, hypertension was included, after having been touted as a substantial risk factor for severe disease since the beginning of the outbreak.
When asked by a reporter why hypertension was moved, Jay Butler, MD, CDC’s deputy director for infectious diseases, said the agency was “talking about strength of evidence rather than upgrading or downgrading risk.”
He added that data have mainly pointed to manifestations of hypertension, such as heart disease and chronic kidney disease, rather than “hypertension alone driving increased risk.”
Butler added the same was true of obesity, where early on, Butler said severe illness was “the most obvious among people with severe obesity,” or a BMI over 40. But new evidence now suggests a BMI over 30 may also increase risk.
Evidence indicated certain populations “might be at an increased risk” of severe COVID-19 infection, including those with lung diseases such as moderate to severe asthma and cystic fibrosis, cerebrovascular disease, neurologic conditions such as dementia, and pregnancy.
CDC Director Robert Redfield, MD, also took time to address media coverage on the growing number of infections among people younger than age 50, adding that at the beginning of the outbreak, these infections often went undiagnosed.
“We didn’t directly pursue diagnostics in young, asymptomatic people,” he said. “We’re in a different situation today than in March and April” when the majority of infections were diagnosed “in older individuals with significant comorbidities.”
Redfield estimated for every one infection diagnosed, there were 10 other infections that went undiagnosed. He referred to reports of a national serosurvey that found 6% of the population had been infected with COVID-19, estimating 5%-8% of the American public has likely experienced infection.
“The traditional approach of looking for symptomatic illness and diagnosing it underestimated the total amount of infections,” Redfield said.
‘Good News, Bad News’ for Pregnant Women
CDC also released new data on characteristics of pregnant women with COVID-19 in an early edition of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. They found that while about a third of pregnant women with COVID-19 were hospitalized compared to only 6% of non-pregnant women, death rates were similar compared to non-pregnant women (0.2% apiece).
After adjusting for age, underlying conditions and race/ethnicity, researchers found that pregnant women were 5.4 times more likely to be hospitalized, 1.5 times more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, and 1.7 times more likely to receive mechanical ventilation versus non-pregnant women. However, there was no increased risk of death, and the observed differences may be explained by closer medical surveillance of pregnant women.
CDC officials characterized the findings as a “good news, bad news picture,” though they noted there is not yet data on how COVID-19 infection ultimately affects the baby.
“Other infections increase the risk for preterm birth, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s a risk factor here,” said Dana Meaney-Delman, MD, of the CDC, on the call with reporters.
The authors examined data from 8,207 pregnant women and 83,205 non-pregnant women ages 15 to 44 from January 22 to June 7, all of whom had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections. The researchers noted the composition of their sample of pregnant women, where 46% were Hispanic, 23% were non-Hispanic white, and 22% were non-Hispanic Black. By contrast, among women with reported race/ethnicity data who gave birth in 2019, 24% were Hispanic, 15% were Black, and 51% were white.
“Although data on race/ethnicity were missing for 20% of pregnant women in this study, these findings suggest that pregnant women who are Hispanic and [Black] might be disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy,” the authors wrote.

Akero continues to pull ahead of Nash rivals

Strong biopsy data sets up efruxifermin as a strong contender in the race to find an effective Nash treatment.
In a field beset by failure Akero Therapeutics continued on its Nash winning streak with another set of impressive data for efruxifermin, formerly known as AKR-001. Following its earlier triumph with MRI results, the group yesterday delivered stellar follow-up biopsy data for its FGF21 stimulant.
Most notable was efruxifermin’s performance in fibrosis, the liver scarring associated with Nash, prompting some analysts to describe the results as “game-changing”. In this secondary analysis of the phase IIb Balanced study, 48% of the 40 responders to treatment, who qualified for end-of treatment biopsies, showed improvement of at least one stage in fibrosis, without worsening of their Nash symptoms; 28% achieved a two-stage improvement in fibrosis.
Additionally, 48% of responders achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. These results are important because the study compared biopsies from both treated and control subjects, which is considered a more robust measure than MRI scans.
The results saw Akero shares open up 37%, hitting a record high since the company floated in June 2019.
Better than the rest?
There had been fears that the Covid-19 pandemic would impact the study, and there was some disruption with only 40 of the suitable 48 responders in the treatment arm receiving biopsies. Perversely, because the mean time to biopsy was pushed out to 20 weeks, meaning they were taken four weeks after the study’s end, the treatment effect might have been even greater had biopsies been conducted at 16 weeks.
Akero also showed satisfying dose-related responses with the 50mg arm of the study reporting 62% improvement in fibrosis and 54% of patients showing Nash resolution.
Efruxifermin produced weight loss across all treatment groups and importantly there were no increases in LDL, something that has beset other Nash treatments and could prove a draw back, given the cardiovascular profile of many patients with Nash.
Efruxifermin win in fibrosis resolution also sets Akero apart from Novo Nordisk, which is attempting to extend the use of the diabetes drug semaglutide into Nash; in a recent trial the GLP-1 agonist failed to show a significant benefit on this measure.
Pulling ahead
Akero’s success is even more salient because it comes hot on the heels of several stumbles in the field. Cymabay abandoned its Nash asset seladelpar following adverse liver events, Genfit’s Resolve-It trial of elafibranor flopped back in May and earlier this week Intercept received a complete response letter from the FDA for its lead asset obeticholic acid.
The Balanced trial also lends strength to the FG21 stimulant mechanism, which is also being studied by Ambrix, 89bio and Novo Nordisk. In morning trading 89bio shares were 18% higher; the company is due to release top line data from its phase Ib/IIa trial for BIO89-100 before the end of the year.
Given the strength of the efruxifermin data Akero said it would be meeting with the FDA later this year with the aim of starting a phase IIb/III study in the first half of 2021, using both the 28mg and 50mg doses of the drug.
On the surface it does look as if efruxifermin is addressing many of the metabolic imbalances of Nash. And while the field is littered with projects that have failed to translate early signals into firmer evidence, Akero now looks like one of the stronger contenders.