Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 21, 2020

Covid-19 vaccine contest turns to T-cell responses

The coronavirus vaccine race now features three front runners with clinical data, and at least one boasts impressive T-cell responses.
In the race to develop a vaccine against Covid-19 Moderna and Biontech/Pfizer’s rival projects have shown an impressive ability to generate neutralising antibodies, but so far little had been said about their ability to stimulate T-cells. Today that changed.
Not only did Astrazeneca’s AZD1222 join the leaders with the first clinical data of its own published in the Lancet, these included findings on its ability to generate a T-cell response. But it was Biontech/Pfizer that, in a preprint of a separate trial of their BNT162b1 vaccine, detailed perhaps the most impressive T-cell responses so far.
It has been hypothesised that to prevent severe Covid-19 infection and generate a long-lasting effect it might be necessary for a vaccine to stimulate cellular as well as humoural (antibody-based) immunity. Both are key parts of an immune response that ultimately leads to the destruction of a pathogen.
Antibodies… and more
Astrazeneca today reported data on just part of the patient population it wants to enrol. The Astra/Oxford University trial has so far enrolled 1,077 subjects, but the Lancet paper’s key findings relate to 35 for whom neutralising antibody levels are available.
91% showed detectable neutralising antibody responses after a single AZD1222 dose, and this became 100% after a booster, the authors wrote. Neutralising antibodies are key as they interfere with a virus’s ability to infect a cell.
T-cell response data, meanwhile, were available for 43 subjects, and a response was induced in all, “peaking by day 14, and maintained two months after injection”, Astra said in a statement. However, the Lancet paper was low on detail, and revealed that “a boost in cellular responses was not observed following the second dose”.
Moreover, nothing was said about whether these were CD4+ (helper) or CD8+ (killer) T-cell responses. This could disappoint investors who had been enthused by a UK press report on Friday that stressed stimulation of killer T cells.
Cross-trial comparison of Biontech/Pfizer, Moderna and Astrazeneca data
Project (company) Study Neutralising antibodies T cells
BNT162b1 (Biontech/Pfizer) NCT04368728 36/36 volunteers producing strong levels No data
BNT162b1 (Biontech/Pfizer) NCT04380701 48/48 volunteers producing strong levels RBD-specific CD8+ responses, up to 0.4% of cells in 29/36
mRNA-1273 (Moderna) NCT04283461 45/45 volunteers producing strong levels S-specific CD8+ responses, up to 0.2% of cells
 
AZD1222 (Astrazeneca) NCT04324606 32/35 volunteers producing strong levels, rising to 35/35 after booster Unspecified T-cell responses, up to 0.7% of cells in 43/43
Source: scientific paper preprints, NEJM & Lancet. RBD=receptor-binding domain.
For its part, Biontech/Pfizer pre-empted the Lancet publication with publication of another scientific paper pre-print, this time relating to a German trial of the mRNA vaccine project BNT162b1, and specifically highlighting its effect on CD8+ T cells.
The trial enrolled 60 subjects across four 1-50µg dose levels. 36 of these were tested for a cellular response, the companies said, and 29 mounted what it called a functional CD8+ T-cell response “comparable to memory responses observed against CMV, EBV and influenza virus”.
What is more, these cellular responses were against the Covid-19 receptor-binding domain, implying a very precise response against the antigen that BNT162b1 encodes. There was no dose-response relationship, which the authors argued was positive, implying that responses could be mounted with even a low dose.
Moderna’s mRNA rival mRNA-1273 had shown effects on T cells when its study was published in the NEJM last week, but these were seen as being somewhat modest. mRNA-1273 encodes not the binding domain but the entire spike (or S) protein, and the responses were said to be S-specific.
The first BNT162b1 study reported, a US trial in 36 evaluable volunteers, had shown strong neutralising antibody responses, but nothing was said about T cells (Covid-19 vaccines remain hot – in spite of Inovio, July 1, 2020).
No doubt investors will continue to pick apart all these data over the coming days. But the Covid-19 tectonic plates have shifted again: Biontech this morning rose 5%, while Astra was unmoved and Moderna lost 10%.


Novavax keeps investors waiting

Those wanting to see whether the US government was right to give Novavax $1.6bn two weeks ago will have to wait a little longer.
Investors and governments desperate for progress with a vaccine against the new coronavirus have this week received an abundance of riches. But they will have to wait until the end of the month for data from Novavax, a company that has unexpectedly managed to secure the biggest award to date from Project Warp Speed – $1.6bn.
The company did present today at a virtual session of the International Society for Vaccines, but in the event this amounted to a summary of preclinical findings. For now investors will have to continue picking apart the minutiae of clinical results unveiled yesterday by Astrazeneca, Biontech/Pfizer and Cansino, and disclosed earlier by Moderna.
Novavax bulls have been primed, however. Speaking at the scientific session, the group’s head of R&D, Greg Glenn, confirmed that clinical results for the trial of its NVX-CoV2373 vaccine would include detail on antibody as well as T-cell responses. Both will be key to determining how the company stacks up against the competition (Covid-19 vaccine contest turns to T-cell responses, July 20, 2020).
What Novavax needs to show to justify its valuation is a separate question, of course. The company’s market cap today stands at $8bn, backed merely by NVX-CoV2373 data generated in non-human primates.
Novavax had secured its $1.6bn of Warp Speed funding just two weeks ago, and it seemed puzzling that the US government did not wait to see clinical data before making such a large award (Novavax shares enter Warp Speed with cash injection, July 7, 2020). It is unclear whether the funding is tranched or contingent on milestones.
Warp Speed bonanza – summary of disclosed awards
Date Company Project Detail ($m)
30 Mar Johnson & Johnson (no code) Adenovirus type 26 vaccine; ph1 starting 22 Jul, ph3 27 Jul 2020 465
16 Apr Moderna mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine in ph1; ph3 starting 27 Jul 2020 483
21 May Astrazeneca AZD1222 Chimp adenovirus vaccine in ph1; ph3 starting 14 Aug 2020 1,200
7 Jul Novavax NVX‑CoV2373 Nanoparticle vaccine; ph1 data late Jul; ph3 starting 15 Oct 2020 1,600
7 Jul Regeneron REGN10933 + REGN10987 MAb “cocktail” in ph1 & ph3; NB, not a vaccine 450
Novavax’s clinical trial tests two NVX-CoV2373 doses, 5μg and 25μg, the latter with or without an adjuvant, in 131 volunteers. Data are expected by the end of July, said Mr Glenn.
For its part, the Chinese group Cansino yesterday saw the scientific publication of clinical data for its Covid-19 vaccine Ad5-nCoV. This trial is by far the largest of any vaccine to read out so far, having been conducted in 382 volunteers assigned one of two doses or placebo.
However, the paper did not alter the view that data are disappointing; seroconversion of neutralising antibody responses occurred in only 59% and 47% of subjects in the two active cohorts. At a time when three competitors are seeing neutralising antibodies at potentially relevant levels in 100% of recipients, albeit in smaller trials, this seems underwhelming.
A key new aspect of Cansino’s data was detail on T-cell responses. It is thought that a vaccine will have to show these, along with generating neutralising antibodies, to yield effective and long-lasting immunity, though of course no one knows what levels of each will actually result in such immunity.
Cansino did report T-cell responses to Ad5-nCoV in 90% and 88% of patients in the two dosing groups, but did not specify whether these concerned CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Also, relative to the response levels cited by Biontech/Pfizer relating to BNT162b1 the Cansino levels seem modest.
Cross-trial comparison of Covid-19 vaccine data
Project (company) Doses Study Neutralising antibodies at relevant levels T cells Toxicity
BNT162b1 
(Biontech/Pfizer)
10-30µg prime & boost, 100µg single NCT04368728 Seen in 36/36 volunteers No data Grade 3 AEs in 2/36 (vs none for placebo); no serious AEs
BNT162b1 
(Biontech/Pfizer)
1-50µg prime & boost, 100µg single NCT04380701 Seen in 48/48 volunteers RBD-specific CD8+ responses in 29/36; mean 1.04% of cells “Occasional” grade 3 reactogenicity; no serious AEs
 
AZD1222
(Astrazeneca)
5n10 viral particles, single or prime & boost NCT04324606 Seen in 32/35 volunteers, rising to 35/35 after boost Unspecified T-cell responses in 43/43; mean ~0.1% of cells No serious or grade 3 AEs (vs 1 serious in control)
 
mRNA-1273
(Moderna)
25-250µg prime & boost NCT04283461 Seen in 45/45 volunteers Very modest; S-specific CD8+ responses seen in 2 outliers, at 0.1-0.2% of cells No serious or grade 3 AEs
 
Ad5-nCoV
(Cansino)
1n11 or 5n10 viral particles, single NCT04341389 Seen in 210/382 volunteers Unspecified T-cell responses in 342/382; mean ~0.01% of cells Grade 3 AEs in 10/382 (vs none for placebo); no serious AEs
Source: scientific paper preprints, NEJM & Lancet. RBD=receptor-binding domain.
CD8+ T-cell responses to Moderna’s mRNA-1273 also look very modest so far. One caveat with the Cansino data is that Ad5-nCoV is being dosed singly; most rivals opt for a prime-and-boost strategy, and indeed the Cansino study’s authors suggest an additional dose to improve efficacy.
The possible effect of an adjuvant is also not yet known. The Novavax data should be the first to show whether this might be another way to increase the potency of certain Covid-19 vaccines.

AMN Healthcare upped to Buy from Hold by SunTrust

https://www.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=AMN