Search This Blog

Friday, September 11, 2020

COVID-19 Storms: Bradykinin In, Cytokine Out?

In the last week, questions have been raised about whether cytokine storm is indeed a culprit in severe COVID-19, while a paper from a government lab has made an intriguing and much-discussed case for a new mechanism, bradykinin storm.

While the concepts are not necessarily mutually exclusive, scientists trying to understand how COVID-19 wreaks its damage on the human body have been buzzing about the new possibilities.

The bradykinin theory was outlined in a July research paper published in eLife, but it was recently featured in a widely read article published on Medium‘s science website, Elemental.

The theory connects many of the disparate symptoms of COVID-19, from a loss of sense of smell and taste, to a gel-like substance forming in the lungs, and abnormal coagulation. It posits that SARS-CoV-2 disrupts both the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the kinin-kallikrein pathways, sending bradykinin — a peptide that dilates blood vessels and makes them leaky — out of whack. The process impedes the transfer of oxygen from the lung to the blood and subsequently to all other tissues, a common abnormality in COVID-19 patients.

Piecing together the hypothesis was a “eureka moment,” said the study’s lead author, Daniel Jacobson, PhD, of Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee.

Jacobson and co-authors used a supercomputer to compare gene expression in lung cells from nine infected and 40 uninfected individuals.

They found the COVID-19 cases had extremely high levels (increased nearly 200-fold) of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the surface protein used by the coronavirus to enter the cell.

When the virus interacts with ACE2, it triggers an abnormal response in the bradykinin pathway, Jacobson said. At the same time, levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme, which is involved in the breakdown of bradykinin, were lower in COVID-19 patients than in controls.

“This is the perfect storm, where all the things that could go wrong will lead the system to really go out of control,” Jacobson told MedPage Today. “When that happens, you’re going to get hyper-permeable blood vessel fluid pouring out of these infected areas and into the lungs.”

Compared with controls, patients with COVID-19 also had upregulated genes responsible for synthesizing hyaluronic acid — a polymer that can absorb more than 1,000 times its weight in water — and downregulated genes responsible for degrading it, Jacobson said.

In effect, the bradykinin dysregulation will cause blood vessels to leak, and the hyaluronic acid dysregulation will pour massive quantities of a gel-like substance into the alveoli. This aligns with autopsy reports that detail the lungs of patients with COVID-19 feeling “like a water balloon that is filled with Jell-O,” Jacobson said.

“That explains why ventilation has been so difficult,” he noted. “At some point when you have enough of this hyaluronic acid in your lungs, with all the water you’ve captured, it kind of doesn’t matter how much oxygen you’re pumping into the lungs — it can’t get through to do gas exchange in the capillaries and alveoli.”

Excess bradykinin can also shift important electrolyte levels, like potassium, which in turn can cause angioedema, sudden cardiac death, diarrhea, and reduced cognitive function, Jacobson and co-authors noted. ACE inhibition has also been linked with a loss of taste or smell.

The bradykinin storm is not mutually exclusive from the cytokine storm described in severe COVID-19 in the early stages of the pandemic. While cytokines are involved in the virus’s attack, Jacobson said they did not see the same out-of-control, cascading effect represented by the cytokine storm hypothesis.

That’s consistent with a growing sense of doubt cast upon the “unproven dogma” of the cytokine storm, as Italian anesthesiologist Maurizio Cecconi, MD, called it on Twitter.

Cecconi cited a recent JAMA research letter that found critically ill patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome actually had lower circulating cytokine levels than patients with bacterial sepsis or other critical conditions.

In contrast, one promising exploratory study published in JAMA Network Open found icatibant, an antagonist against bradykinin receptors, improved oxygenation in early-stage COVID-19 patients, Jacobson said.

“[The cytokine storm] was really based on other diseases, and the more we learn about COVID, the more we learn how different it is from most things we’ve encountered in so many ways,” he added.

However, it’s also possible, or even likely, that both types of responses are occurring simultaneously in COVID-19 infection, commented Allen Kaplan, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina.

Kaplan, who has done fundamental research on bradykinin for the past several decades, said the literature on bradykinin and COVID-19 is “very exciting” and worth pursuing.

“This article mainly just measured protein levels but when you see numbers like that, you can intuit, ‘Gee, if it’s that high, what is it doing?'” Kaplan said of the Oak Ridge paper. “They haven’t taken it to the next step to show what it’s doing; we are inferring based on the protein levels they have measured.”

Another study released in preprint in April also postulated that bradykinin receptors were playing a major role in the body’s response to the virus. However, neither actually measured bradykinin levels in the body.

Measuring bradykinin itself is challenging because it is formed and degraded during the process of drawing blood, said Nancy J. Brown, MD, of Yale University, who also studies bradykinin.

Still, the findings are “really intriguing,” and could also explain some aspects of the abnormal coagulation associated with COVID-19 patients, Brown said. In animal studies, bradykinin has been shown to boost levels of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a protein involved in the breakdown of blood clots, she explained.

“This may be a culprit,” Brown told MedPage Today. “The way to know that for sure is to do studies looking at bradykinin receptor blockers or drugs that prevent the formation of bradykinin.”

There are drugs on the market that target this mechanism — for hereditary angioedema, a condition marked by bradykinin overactivation — and at least two U.S. trials are currently underway. One trial is looking at icatibant (Firazyr) in critically ill COVID-19 patients, and another is testing lanadelumab (Takhzyro), a monoclonal antibody that targets kallikrein, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and pneumonia.

Jacobson said targeting this mechanism would likely require multiple treatments. “If you’re in a boat with a lot of holes, there is not one huge cork that’s going to fill all the holes. You want to cork each of them individually,” he said. “With different points of intervention, we are thinking we will probably have better outcomes, but that is what we want to get tested in a clinical trial setting.”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/88560

Racial Disparity in Vasopressin Could Explain Much

Researchers found racial differences in a biochemical driver of hypertension that could be part of the explanation for the latter’s higher prevalence in Black Americans.

Copeptin concentration — a surrogate for vasopressin level — was higher in Black Americans (median 7.4 vs 5.4 pmol/L for whites, P<0.001), a finding that persisted after adjustment for urine sodium and calculated osmolality (P=0.0012), according to a group led by Ronstan Lobo, MB, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, reporting during a poster session at this year’s virtual Hypertension meeting of the American Heart Association.

“Higher copeptin values in Blacks could mean that they may have lower sodium excretion, which exacerbates the volume retention,” according to the poster. “Their high volume state is corroborated by the significantly lower renin seen in Blacks vs whites.”

Indeed, Black patients had less than half the renin activity of white people in the study (0.5 vs 1.2 ng/mL/h, P<0.001). They also had lower calculated plasma osmolality (280.8 vs 282.5 mOsm/kg, P<0.001).

Those with low renin hypertension are said to need a volume-depleting strategy to achieve blood pressure (BP) control.

Ultimately, differences in vasopressin apparently help to explain the differences in hypertensive phenotypes between racial groups, Lobo and colleagues concluded. “The underlying mechanisms require further study.”

Samples for the study came from the older GERA I study. Participants included 230 Black and 206 white patients. Those with renal disease were excluded.

Lobo’s team had frozen blood samples thawed and copeptin measured on an assay.

The antidiuretic hormone vasopressin increases water permeability via the aquaporin-2 channel and increases activity of the epithelial sodium channel in distal nephrons, favoring increased sodium retention. Copeptin is a fragment of pre-pro-arginine vasopressin that is larger and has a prolonged half-life — thus easier to measure in the lab than vasopressin itself.

Investigators previously confirmed that concentration of copeptin matches that of vasopressin.

Based on this study, vasopressin appears to be one more way in which Black people would be more likely to have high BP caused by fluid retention, agreed J. David Spence, MD, of the Robarts Research Institute at University of Western Ontario, London, who was not involved with the study.

What’s more, Spence said, it adds to two other known mechanisms for the lower plasma renin in Black patients: excess aldosterone secretion, and excess renal tubular absorption of sodium (due to changes in the function of the renal tubular epithelial sodium channel).

Genetics may explain why vasopressin values are higher in Blacks, Lobo’s group suggested. One theory is that their ancestors evolved in warmer climates where dehydration is more common, so volume retention would be helpful. Faced with the contemporary American diet of high salt intake, however, this results in more sodium and water retention in Black people today.

That the study relied on frozen samples from nearly 20 years ago was a limitation of the present analysis. Additionally, the researchers calculated osmolality and not blood urea nitrogen.

Disclosures

Lobo had no disclosures.

One study co-author reported consulting for most of the major diagnostic companies.

Primary Source

Hypertension

Source Reference: Lobo R, et al “Vasopressin contributes to differences in the physiology of hypertension between non-Hispanic blacks and whites” Hypertension 2020.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/ash/88576

Mental Health to Play a Role in the Defense Strategy for Elizabeth Holmes

Elizabeth Holmes, the founder and former chief executive officer of failed diagnostics company Theranos, will be examined by a psychologist and psychiatrist ahead of her looming trial for fraud.

Holmes’s state of mind and her mental health are expected to be part of her legal team’s strategy for the trial. In a filing submitted to the court, and first reported by Bloomberg, Holmes’ attorneys intend to “introduce expert evidence relating to a mental disease or defect or any other mental condition of the defendant bearing on … the issue of guilt.” The Holmes legal team expects to use testimony from Dr. Mindy Mechanic, a clinical psychologist at California State University, Fullerton.

While the Holmes team has not publicly alluded to the former Theranos executive’s mental state of mind, Mechanic’s area of expertise centers on the “psychosocial consequences of violence, trauma and victimization with an emphasis on violence against women and other forms of interpersonal violence,” CNN reported, citing CSU’s website. Information as to what Mechanic will testify about has been redacted on the filing.

Following the Holmes’ disclosure of including mental health-related testimony as part of their defense, this week U.S. District Court Judge Edward Davila ordered that Holmes will be evaluated by the psychologist and psychiatrist for the government. The two experts will be allowed to interview and examine Holmes for a combined total of 14 hours. The sessions will be videoed. CNN reported the recordings will be made over the objections of Holmes’ attorneys.  

The Holmes trial was scheduled to begin this past summer, but has been delayed until March 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Holmes and former Theranos President Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, were initially charged with multiple counts of fraud in 2018 related to the blood-testing company, Theranos. From 2013 to 2015 Holmes and Balwani raised more than $700 million from investors through what the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission called “years-long fraud” in which they exaggerated or lied about the efficacy of the company’s proprietary technology and the state of its finances, according to the complaint. The company also made false claims about its relationship with the Department of Defense and its regulatory status with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during that time period.

While the Theranos duo touted the technology it never produced any supporting evidence in peer-reviewed publications. The company relied on the personality of Holmes to push the false narrative about the technology. As a result of the alleged fraudulent promises made to investors, the valuation of Theranos swelled to $9 billion and made Holmes one of the youngest billionaires in the United States.

The prosecution added additional charges against the duo, but those were dropped in July. Additional fraud charges were dropped by Davila in February.

Balwani’s trial is expected to begin following the conclusion of Holmes’ trial.

https://www.biospace.com/article/mental-health-to-play-a-role-in-the-defense-strategy-for-elizabeth-holmes/

Non-vaccine nasal spray could protect against COVID-19

Two UK biotechs – Destiny Pharma and Sporegen – have joined forces to develop a nasal spray that they say could serve as a first line of defense against COVID-19 infections.

The nasal spray could provide protection from infection within a few days of administration, and would be easy to make in bulk at a low cost, say the partners.

The programme is still in the early stages of development, but if it works in trials would provide another approach to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, alongside vaccines and prophylactic antibodies.

That could be important if it takes longer than expected to bring vaccines and antibodies to market, said a spokesman for the companies, pointing to the news this week that AstraZeneca has halted phase 3 trials of its COVID-19 vaccine candidate AZD1222 after a serious adverse reaction in one patient.

The spray is based on the SporeVax technology developed at Sporegen by Royal Holloway University Professor Simon Cutting and takes the form of heat killed spores of a bacterium – Bacillus subtilis – that stimulate a part of the innate immune system known as mucosal immunity.

That is a first line of defence that is concentrated in cells lining the respiratory tract and other surfaces of the body like the intestines and the urogenital tract, but doesn’t tend to be activated by conventional vaccines.

The SporeVax platform has already been applied to other pathogens including pandemic flu, tetanus, anthrax, and Clostridium species.

The spray that will be developed alongside Destiny Pharma – called SPOR-COV – is a modified form of B. subtilis spores engineered to present SARS-CoV-2 antigens to the mucosal immune system.

Because spores are so stable, it could be stockpiled “almost indefinitely” without the need for cold chain refrigeration, unlike some other COVID-19 vaccines in development, according to the two biotechs.

That could make it easier to ship to areas of the world with less sophisticated pharmaceutical supply chains. According to Prof Cutting, SPOR-COV may also retain its activity if SARS-CoV-2 mutates.

The UK government has provided £800,000 in grant funding over the next 18 months to the project via its Innovate UK unit, covering most of a near-term development budget of £1 million.

The aim is to complete the preclinical studies and develop the manufacturing process for SPOR-COV in the next 18 months and be ready to start human testing thereafter.

20-second coronavirus screening test piloted at U.K.’s Heathrow airport

Two British companies are preparing to launch a simple COVID-19 saliva screening test that aims to provide an accurate result within 20 seconds—following its first uses at London’s Heathrow airport, one of the busiest in the world.

The Virolens device, developed by iAbra, uses a digital microscope and artificial intelligence-powered software to visually search a mouth swab sample for signs of the novel coronavirus.

The machine provides a low-cost, repeatable and self-administered method of screening, allowing hundreds of cartridge-based tests to be performed each day, according to iAbra’s manufacturing partner TT Electronics. Validation studies by the University of Bristol have pegged the system’s false-negative rate of 0.2%, alongside a false-positive rate of 3.3%.

The Virolens device underwent its first rounds of field testing among Heathrow employees, and its developers are now planning full clinical trials to gain certifications for medical use.

“I have experienced iAbra’s test myself, alongside the PCR test—it is quicker and cheaper, and potentially more accurate,” said Heathrow Airport CEO John Holland Kaye. “We urge the government to fast-track this technology to protect the economy and help save millions of jobs in this country.” 

According to a report from the Financial Times, iAbra said the machine will cost less than $20,000, with cartridge testing kits about “the price of a paperback book.” 

Meanwhile, Heathrow has also tried out two other rapid-result coronavirus tests: Geneme’s RT-LAMP nasal swab test, and Mologic’s lateral-flow saliva testing strip. The findings are being shared with the U.K. government as countries and airports look to find the most efficient and user-friendly testing methods for screening passengers.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/20-second-coronavirus-screening-test-piloted-at-u-k-s-heathrow-airport

Celltrion passes early safety trial for anti-COVID-19 antibody as key tests await

Vaccines get all the headlines, but the use of antibodies to both treat and prevent SARS-CoV-02 infection is an equally major part of the COVID-19 arsenal.

Eli Lilly and partner AbCellera are furthest along in the antibody stakes with an ongoing phase 3 program, but South Korea’s Celltrion, better known for its biosimilar work, is also forging ahead, releasing encouraging safety data this morning as it looks to push on into later-stage trials.

It’s top-line stuff, but the available data showed that CT-P59, its anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibody, saw no “significant drug-related adverse events, and importantly there were no adverse events from the maximum tolerated dose cohort.”

It did not give further details, but the test was set up to see how safe the drug could be in preventing the disease.

Bigger trials now await: The phase 1 in mild COVID-19 patients is ongoing, but it is slated to kick-start plans to conduct further global phase 2 and 3 trials.

One will enroll around 3,000 patients and will include those involved in the prevention test, investigating the use of CT-P59 as a preventive treatment for COVID-19 in those in close contact with COVID-19 patients.

Data from this program “should be complete by the first half of 2021.”

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/celltrion-passes-early-safety-trial-for-anti-covid-antibody-as-key-tests-await