Search This Blog

Saturday, February 5, 2022

The curious case of the BioNTech priority review voucher

 Earlier this week, the FDA fully approved Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine, and with that approval, the company was awarded what is almost certainly a lucrative priority review voucher.


The vouchers can be used for a priority review of a new drug, offering a short cut to an FDA decision, or can be sold on the open market — for upwards of $100 million.


The PRV for Moderna was issued by the FDA under its material threat medical countermeasure PRV program, and that program has allowed FDA to provide a PRV for all fully approved products used to treat or prevent Covid-19.


But the only other two Covid-related products that have been fully approved are the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and Gilead’s Veklury.


Priority review voucher updates: Who's won PRVs, who's bought them, and how much they're selling for

Indeed, the FDA’s updated list now includes both Moderna’s Covid vaccine and Gilead’s Veklury.


But curiously, Pfizer’s vaccine is not listed by the FDA under its MCM PRVs [Update as of 2/3/22 at 5:33 PM, the FDA has now updated its list to include the BioNTech voucher, which was granted by FDA on Aug. 23, 2021] but the approval letter for the vaccine did not include any mention of the PRV (even though Moderna’s approval letter does mention its PRV).


A Pfizer spokesperson told Endpoints News that BioNTech is the marketing authorization holder for the vaccine, and a BioNTech spokesperson told us that the company did receive the voucher, but did not issue a press release on it.


A BioNTech spokesperson later clarified: “FDA didn’t mention our voucher in the approval letter because we requested it after the initial BLA was approved.”


So why the lack of transparency from the FDA initially? Why not mention the PRV in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine approval letter? An FDA spokesperson did not respond to questions, but said, “Additional questions about this topic should be directed to Pfizer-BioNTech.”


As the agency’s voucher program has aged, and added different types of vouchers like the MCM PRVs, more and more companies have gone silent on what they’re doing with the PRVs, how many are being used internally, and how many are being sold, and at what price.


While details eventually do emerge, as with BioNTech, the companies have no incentive to be clear on what’s going on, particularly when a company is big enough that $100 million might not be noteworthy.

Updated to include additional comment from BioNTech. BioNTech has since filed a 6-K with the SEC that publishes this story in full. Following the SEC filing, the FDA updated its list of MCM PRVs on Feb. 3, 164 days after first issuing the PRV.

https://endpts.com/the-curious-case-of-the-biontech-priority-review-voucher/

Transcript : Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Q4 2021 Earnings Call, Feb 04, 2022

 https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/REGENERON-PHARMACEUTICALS-10649/news/Transcript-Regeneron-Pharmaceuticals-Inc-Q4-2021-Earnings-Call-Feb-04-2022-37752221/

Transcript : IRadimed Corporation, Q4 2021 Earnings Call, Feb 04, 2022

 https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/IRADIMED-CORPORATION-16917558/news/Transcript-IRadimed-Corporation-Q4-2021-Earnings-Call-Feb-04-2022-37757728/

EVOTEC : RBC gives a Buy rating

 RBC is positive on the stock with a Buy rating. The target price is still set at EUR 50.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/EVOTEC-SE-436047/news/EVOTEC-RBC-gives-a-Buy-rating-37768498/

Fauci Eyes Permanent Mask Rule for Air Travel

 The American public will never stop wearing masks on airplanes, says Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House chief medical advisor.

ABC News This Week host Jonathan Karl asked Fauci if we will ever reach a time where we don’t have to wear masks on airplanes, on December 19.

“I don’t think so,” said Fauci said. “I think when you’re dealing with a close space, even though the filtration is good, that you want to go that extra step.”

Despite his certitude as to the nation’s most visible health official, Fauci’s comments put him at odds with a 2020 study conducted for the Department of Defense (DoD) by American Airlines on airline travel. The study found that when seated with a mask on, “only 0.003% of particles actually made their way into another passenger’s breathing zone.”

‘Masks Don’t Add Much’

Karl’s interview with Fauci occurred shortly after several CEOs from top U.S. airlines testified before Congress that passengers are actually safer on a plane than in an intensive care unit because of the filtration systems on flights.

“The case is very strong that masks don’t add much, if anything, in the air cabin environment,” said Gary Kelly, CEO of Southwest Airlines, at a hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation, on December 15. “It is very safe and high-quality compared to any other indoor setting,” Kelly said.

American Airlines CEO Doug Parker agreed. “An aircraft is the safest place you can be,” said Parker. “It’s true of all of our aircraft—they all have the same HEPA filters and airflow.”

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) responded that he was “shocked” by their suggestion that masks are no longer needed on airplanes.

Masks ‘Make People Feel Safer’

Mask mandates for jet travel aren’t about safety, says Jay Lehr, senior science analyst at the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow.

“Extensive research has never shown masks to be effective as a control of the various viruses now plaguing the world,” said Lehr. “They may make people feel safer, but they are not,” said Lehr. “Their most important effectiveness is proving to government that it can control the population and take personal freedom away based on unwarranted fear.”

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has extended the current face mask requirement for U.S. travelers at airports, on commercial aircraft, buses, and trains to last through September 13, 2022.

Kenneth Artz (KApublishing@gmx.com) writes from Dallas, Texas.

Internet Info:

U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation, “Oversight of the U.S. Airline Industry,” December 15, 2021: https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/12/commerce-committee-announces-airline-industry-hearing-on-december-15-2021

“TSA extends face mask requirement at airports and throughout the transportation network,” National Press Release, April 30, 2021: https://www.tsa.gov/news/press/releases/2021/04/30/tsa-extends-face-mask-requirement-airports-and-throughout

David Silcott et al., “TRANSCOM/AMC Commercial Aircraft Cabin Aerosol Dispersion Tests,” United States Transportation Command & Air Mobility Command (AMC), October 2020: https://www.ustranscom.mil/cmd/docs/TRANSCOM%20Report%20Final.pdf

https://heartlanddailynews.com/2022/01/fauci-eyes-permanent-mask-rule-for-air-travel/

MSNBC Misinfo: Zeke Emanuel Says Unvaxxed Children 'Likely To Get Serious Case Of Covid'

 Dr Ezekiel Emanuel - former Biden Covid-19 adviser and brother of former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (and the real 'Ari Gold' from Entourage) appeared on MSNBC Wednesday, where he proceeded to peddle the lie that unvaccinated children are 'likely' to get a 'serious' case of Covid.

"This repeats what we’ve seen in older kids, five and above, where we know the vaccine does protect very well. And there we still have under 50%, I believe, of the children vaccinated, and that’s a serious problem for the country," Emanuel told host Kristen Welker after she asked about parents' willingness to vaccinate their children. "Parents have to be more willing – I think they hear some of these rare side effects and think they’re very common."

"With the omicron variant, kids are either going to get the vaccine or they’re likely to get a serious condition of omicronHaving omicron with the vaccine is almost invariably going to be better and safer for children," Emanuel added. "I am confused about parents' attitudes. Five and above seems like a no-brainer. Two to five, I understand some hesitancy. Two and under with the small dose, I think probably a very good idea."

It's been widely established that Omicron is a relatively mild strain of Covid - from which children face an extremely low risk.

Another recent study cited by economist Emily Oster also reiterated the extremely low risk young children face of severe COVID-19 outcomes. "What we can say is that based on everything we know, the risks to small children from COVID-19 are extremely small," she wrote. -Fox News

MSNBC faced harsh criticism over Emanuel's statement.

The network even tweeted (and then deleted) the easily debunked misinformation, receiving a serious ratio of comments to 'likes.'

Intentional? Or...

Following the backlash, Emanuel issued a Saturday tweet in which he says he "misspoke."

COVID tests the government sent you might not work. Cold weather could be to blame

 At the same time most Americans are facing cold fronts and winter storms, they're also expecting their at-home COVID-19 tests from the government to arrive in the mail. 

Most at-home COVID-19 test brands recommend storing the tests above 35 degrees. The liquid reagent inside the cartridge that comes with the at-home tests is susceptible to freezing, and if that happens, the accuracy of the results decreases, Cindy Prins, associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Florida, told USA TODAY.

With the federal government launching a program to send free at-home COVID-19 tests to Americans who sign up through the website COVIDTests.gov, 1 billion tests have been ordered for distribution via the U.S. Postal Service.

But could prolonged cold or freezing temperatures affect the results of the government-sent tests? It depends on how long it's been cold, experts said.

What does it mean if your at-home tests comes in the mail and it's cold?

Dr. Geoffrey Baird, Chair, chair of laboratory medicine and pathology at the University of Washington's School of Medicinesaid the issue with the at-home tests is that if the liquid inside the cartridge is frozen, the results can be skewed.

If the test is outside for a few hours, odds are the test is fine, although not as accurate as it once was. If your test is in your mailbox for a day or more, Baird advises using a PCR test instead. Baird said if your test spent a night in your mailbox in 25-degree weather, it may be best to order another test. 

"Just as anything with liquid, if it's chilled or frozen, it changes. That's the same with these at-home tests," Baird said. "At a time where temperatures are freezing in most places, it's safer to choose another test."

Most studies have found a change in the temperature of the at-home test may result in a false-negative test rather than a false-positive, she added. She said if someone is exposed and tests negative with the at-home test, they should receive a PCR test to confirm the results.

"The sensitivity to coronavirus on these tests can be decreased with temperature changes, and it's always tricky to tell by how much," Prins said. "But more often than not, a wrong test shows a false-positive, so then you should get a PCR test."

Antigen tests exposed for extended periods of time to temperatures below 36 degrees or above 86 degrees can deliver inaccurate results, according to a study published by the National Institutes of Health.

“Consequences may include false-negative test results,” the researchers wrote. “Storage and operation of [antigen tests] at recommended conditions is essential for successful usage during the pandemic.”

What to do if your test comes in the mail cold or frozen

As soon as you get an email confirming your at-home test has arrived, Prins recommended immediately storing it indoors. If the test arrives cold, the room temperature environment will help thaw the liquid inside. But Prins said not to place the test in immediate sun because high temperatures can also affect the results. 

"Your best bet is room temperature. Nothing colder or hotter because the test is sensitive to those temperatures," Prinssaid.

Baird recommends waiting at least four to five hours before using the cold or frozen at-home test. Fortunately, the packaging of the tests was created to be durable through the shipping and arrival process. 

The U.S. Postal Service said tests will ship within 7-12 days of ordering and all orders are mailed through First Class Package Service. 

Abbott BinaxNOW recommends that its tests remain between 35.6 degrees Fahrenheit and 86 degrees Fahrenheit, adding "test kit reagents must be at room temperature before use," a spokesperson for Abbott told USA TODAY.

However if a test is stored outside the recommended temperature "for a relatively short period of time," it will be fine to use after being placed back in room temperature, the spokesperson said.

If the test lines on your at-home test appear in the incorrect order or color, Baird said that's an indicator it's been contaminated by the weather.

"When you freeze and thaw something, the solutions in it may not actually get back into solution as it once was before. That's where the inaccuracy in these at-home tests can come from," Baird said.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/02/04/cold-temperatures-could-affect-home-covid-test/6650634001/