Search This Blog

Saturday, April 1, 2023

Effectiveness of lactation cookies on human milk production

 They sell worldwide, often retailing for more than $2.50 per two-ounce bag: Lactation cookies, which manufacturers purport to increase milk in people who breastfeed. Many claim they work—but what does the science say?

Several esteemed nutrition researchers collaborated on "Effectiveness of Lactation Cookies on Human Milk Production Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial," recently published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

David B. Allison, Ph.D., dean of the Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington (SPH-B), is among the researchers who conducted a one-month,  of lactating parents of healthy babies in the same age range. Their findings revealed no evidence for an effect of consuming lactation cookies on human milk production.

"Too often in the field of nutrition and food, strong beliefs—sometimes even well-reasoned conjectures based upon some —are mistaken for demonstrated facts," Allison said. "Conjecture is good, but knowing is better. We come to know about the effects of nutrition and  through rigorous, randomized, controlled trials. Having conducted such a study on lactation cookies, we found no evidence for their effectiveness.

"This does not mean that it is impossible for any lactation cookie to affect human milk production," he continues. "This study does suggest that the cookies we studied—under the conditions we studied them—have no discernible effect. The burden of proof seems to now be on those who claim there is an effect."

The study followed 176 U.S. parents who were exclusively breastfeeding healthy two-month-old babies. One group of parents was provided a serving of commercially available lactation cookies to consume daily for a month; the other group of parents ate a serving of conventional cookies not designed to increase lactation, each day for a month. Through a weekly survey, parents reported the quantity of milk they produced after following a validated milk expression protocol using a hospital-grade breast pump, providing data that were analyzed by both the study authors and an independent statistician. These data demonstrated that the impact of consuming lactation cookies did not have a significant effect on how much milk was actually produced or perceived to be produced by the lactating parents.

The authors assert that consumers should be cautious when considering the potential effect of this product, or any food and/or supplement that promotes health-promoting benefits without published, peer-reviewed scientific evidence to support its claims. As the researchers noted, these lactation cookies can contain substantial calories and sugars, which could affect postpartum weight loss efforts and related health issues.

"Despite being a physician and nutrition scientist focused on early-life , I still remember how difficult breastfeeding was for me with both of my children," said study lead author Ana M. Palacios, MD, Ph.D., assistant professor, Department of Health Policy and Community Health, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University.

"Our research highlights that lactation cookies, which include added sugars and saturated fat, may not have the said purported benefits of increasing milk production. Purchasing  cookies to increase milk production may pose an unnecessary cost and may have additional implications for parents, such as limiting post-pregnancy weight loss and reducing consumption of healthier foods. More research is needed to better understand what foods and nutrients can best help increase  supply in diverse populations."

More information: Ana M. Palacios et al, Effectiveness of lactation cookies on human milk production rates: a randomized controlled trial, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.03.010


https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-04-effectiveness-lactation-cookies-human-production.html

How cells control developmental timetables

 TERESA RAYON HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0001-5173-1442 Authors Info & Affiliations

Abstract

An overview on the molecular and metabolic mechanisms behind individual cell differences in developmental timing in the segmentation clock and the central nervous system.
From the cell cycle to circadian rhythms, biology relies on precise timing. This includes the duration of a process, the order and direction of events, and the rate at which a process operates. Timing can depend on extrinsic mechanisms that guide the synchronous progression through development of a group of cells via systemic cues. However, timing also relies on intrinsic mechanisms that keep track of time within cells. A focus on developmental timing is gaining momentum, as researchers tease out the molecular and metabolic mechanisms responsible for it.
In evolutionary developmental biology, differences in genetically controlled temporal programs are well recognized and referred to as heterochronies. These include differences in the time of initiation, duration, or rate of a process in comparison with an organisms’ ancestors or other species. Whereas shifts in the time of initiation or duration have been linked to genetic variation of regulatory sequences or differential expression dynamics (12), other heterochronies that emerge from changes in the rate of a process are distinct and usually involve the same genetic program operating at different speeds. This has been termed allochrony and does not seem to be explained by variations in regulatory sequences (Fig. 1, A to C) (34). However, less is known about the mechanisms driving allochronies. ...

Boost in learning by removing nuclear phosphodiesterases and enhancing nuclear cAMP signaling

 VSEVOLOD V. GUREVICH HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-3950-5351 AND EUGENIA V. GUREVICH HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-0563-8295Authors Info & Affiliations

Abstract

cAMP signaling in the nucleus leads to the expression of immediate early genes in neurons and learning and memory. In this issue of Science Signaling, Martinez et al. found that activation of the β2-adrenergic receptor enhances nuclear cAMP signaling that supports learning and memory in mice by removing the phosphodiesterase PDE4D5 from the nucleus through arrestin3 bound to the internalized receptor.

Neuroimmune interactions in the skin can shape the functions of dendritic cells

 BARBARA U. SCHRAML Authors Info & Affiliations

Abstract

Efficient host defense relies on the ability to mount context-dependent immune responses. Dendritic cells (DCs) sense pathogens and tissue damage and subsequently migrate to lymph nodes to present antigens to naive T cells. Through the production of cytokines, DCs further instruct other immune cells about which type of immune response is needed (1). For example, DC-derived interleukin-23 (IL-23) in the skin promotes efficient defense against Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus infections, but it also drives psoriasislike skin inflammation (23). Nociceptors are somatosensory neurons that innervate barrier organs and detect noxious stimuli, including mechanical injury, reactive chemicals, inflammatory mediators, and pathogens (4). Nociceptors relay noxious stimuli to the brain as pain or itching sensation and release neuropeptides, which can influence immune cells (4). On page 1315 of this issue, Hanč et al. (5) report the identification of multiple mechanisms by which nociceptors can regulate DCs in the skin.

Effective immunotherapy occurs in neurons

 REBECCA M. NISBET Authors Info & Affiliations

Abstract

The main pathological hallmark of a group of neurodegenerative diseases called tauopathies is the formation of intracellular aggregates composed of the tau protein in the brain. Despite promising results in preclinical studies, tau immunotherapies in clinical development for the treatment of tauopathies, including Alzheimer’s disease, have thus far failed to improve patient cognition. Owing to its critical pathological role, most still argue that tau is an excellent therapeutic target. Therefore, better understanding of the mechanisms by which tau antibodies can remove pathogenic tau from the brain and how these processes can be exploited is paramount for the design of second-generation immunotherapies. On page 1336 of this issue, Mukadam et al. (1) show that the cytoplasmic antibody receptor and E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite motif-containing 21 (TRIM21) is required for effective tau immunotherapy in a tauopathy mouse model, providing an area of focus for the development of future tau antibodies.

The link between obesity and autoimmunity

 Compelling epidemiological evidence reveals a strong association between being overweight or obese and the risk of developing autoimmune diseases (1). From an immunological standpoint, the cellular and molecular mechanisms linked to this association include the overstimulation of T lymphocytes by nutrient- and energy-sensing pathways. The immunometabolic state of an individual is central to the modulation of immunological self-tolerance that suppresses self-reactivity to avoid autoimmunity. Adipose tissue is an immunologically active organ that influences systemic immune responses through the production of adipocytokines, and, in turn, immune cells affect adipocyte homeostasis and metabolism through the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (2). This implies that metabolic overload from obesity can affect immunometabolism, which can alter susceptibility to autoimmune diseases.

Immunological adaptations occur in response to nutritional status: Undernutrition impairs immunity, causing inefficient responses to infections and vaccinations. Conversely, overnutrition favors chronic activation of both innate and adaptive immune cells, with subsequent (low-grade) systemic inflammation. These phenomena occur through the engagement of intracellular nutrient- and energy-sensing pathways and the NACHT, LRR and PYD domains–containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, which is a sensor of metabolic stress that is induced by an excess of glucose and lipids, especially in macrophages (23).
Obesity is a risk factor for autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes (T1D) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (45). Environmental and lifestyle factors that increase MS risk include smoking, sun exposure, low vitamin D, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and high body mass index (BMI). Prospective longitudinal studies in young obese individuals found a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in the risk of developing MS during adolescence and young adulthood (but not at the time of MS onset); this association with obesity was also confirmed in carriers of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–DRB1*15:01 susceptibility allele that is responsible for the presentation of myelin self-antigens to autoreactive T cells (5). Similarly, higher BMI at birth is associated with higher T1D susceptibility in children. Indeed, the incidence of T1D increased almost linearly with a higher birth weight (1.7% increase in incidence per 100-g increase in birth weight) (4).
Mechanistically, it has been suggested that increased body adiposity promotes the hyperactivation of intracellular nutrient- and energy-sensing pathways [such as mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)] with subsequent metabolic overload in peripheral tissues, including resident immune cells that are involved in both effector and regulatory immune responses (6). For example, in obese naïve-to-treatment MS patients, the adipocytokine leptin (secreted in proportion to BMI to inhibit food intake), together with elevated amounts of circulating nutrients, was found to boost inflammatory immune responses. High levels of leptin and nutrients cause constitutive overactivation of mTOR in T cells, with subsequent dysregulated T cell receptor (TCR)–mediated signaling. Overactive mTOR in T cells mimics a strong, supra-physiological TCR stimulation that is not permissive for transcription of the forkhead-box P3 (FOXP3) gene, the expression of which is pivotal for the induction and maintenance of anti-inflammatory CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) (26). Through leptin overproduction, obesity impairs the proliferation of anti-inflammatory thymic Tregs and their peripheral differentiation from CD4+CD25 conventional T (Tconv) cell precursors (7). Obesity also promotes conversion of Tconv cells into pathogenic inflammatory T helper 1 (TH1) and TH17 cells, thus increasing the risk of altered immunological self-tolerance (see the figure).
Overall, nutrient- and leptin-induced mTOR overactivation inhibits peripheral Treg proliferation and suppressive function and enhances obesity-associated TH1 and TH17 cell differentiation, with a higher risk of MS-associated myelin damage (27). Further, a recent report demonstrated that obese mice converted the classical TH2-predominant immune responses of atopic dermatitis into a severe disease predominantly characterized by TH17-driven inflammation that was caused by reduced activity of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) transcription factor (8). The expression of PPAR-− in adipose tissue was also necessary for the development and function of adipose-tissue resident Tregs, suggesting a further bidirectional link between adipose tissue biology and immune tolerance that involves Tregs (27).
Physiological nutrients and leptin fluctuations due to daily cycles of fasting and feeding determine oscillations in mTOR activity that are lost in obesity because of excessive food intake. Therefore, in individuals with a normal BMI and physiological cycles of feeding and fasting, the maintenance and perpetuation of self-tolerance are associated with oscillations of mTOR activity in Tregs. This appears to be necessary for Treg expansion and function in sufficient numbers to suppress pathogenic TH1 and TH17 cells and thus autoimmunity (267).
Of note, mTOR represents a key intracellular node at the crossroad of amino acid, glucose, and lipid metabolism. Furthermore, growth factors linked to nutrition and metabolism, such as leptin, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), activate mTOR signaling in immune cells, which affects systemic and intracellular immunometabolism and thus inflammation and autoimmunity (26). Adipose tissue also secretes inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α), IL-6, IL-17, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), as well as leptin, which leads to a higher susceptibility to peripheral tissue damage and autoimmunity. Therefore, I propose that metabolic workload—induced by nutrients, adipocyte-derived growth factors, and adipocytokines—may represent an accelerator of autoimmune disorders in people who typically consume an obesogenic Western diet.
It has been demonstrated in mice and in humans that adaptive and innate immune cells can directly influence the pathophysiological events that lead to obesity and obesity-associated metabolic abnormalities (2). This could also contribute to the reduction in Treg numbers observed in obese people. There is an anatomical and functional cross-talk between adipose tissue and the immune system. Indeed, both primary lymphoid organs (bone marrow and thymus) and secondary lymphoid organs (lymph nodes) are generally embedded in and surrounded by adipose tissue. This contiguity allows T cells, Tregs, B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages to home to adipose tissue. Additionally, adipocytes can express immune-like behaviors (2). For example, adipocytes can clear intracellular bacteria using the same nuclear-binding oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) pathogen-sensing system of innate immune cells (9). Changes in Treg numbers and function observed in obesity may also affect susceptibility to infections and cancer (2). Indeed, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with the production of autoantibodies and is more severe in obese individuals (10). Additionally, cancer immunotherapy responses are better in obese people than in patients with a lower BMI (2).
GRAPHIC: A. FISHER/SCIENCE
OPEN IN VIEWER
Polygenic obesity (predisposition to obesity caused by multiple genetic variants and environmental factors) has also been proposed to be an autoimmune-like disease, whereby T cells respond to unknown adipocyte antigens and trigger subsequent uncontrolled food intake, although the mechanism remains to be fully elucidated (11). It is notable that CD4+ T cells isolated from obese mice could transfer an “obesity memory” by promoting weight gain when injected into normal-weight, immune-deficient recipients (11). Thus, it appears that obesity associates with a higher susceptibility to develop autoimmunity not only because adipose tissue boosts autoinflammatory responses but also because obesity itself has autoimmune-like features.
A promising possibility is the manipulation of immune tolerance and autoimmunity through immunometabolic interventions: reduced food and/or calorie intake. Although the idea that fasting could modulate immune responses and alleviate symptoms of autoimmune diseases had mostly been dismissed, studies over the past 20 years have provided evidence that supports the therapeutic potential of behavioral changes and nutritional strategies such as diet, caloric restriction (CR), and different fasting regimens (212). Mild CR, intermittent fasting, and a ketogenic diet have each shown beneficial effects in mouse models of autoimmunity, including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), experimental rheumatoid arthritis, and experimental colitis (212). I suggest that “starving” pathogenic inflammatory TH1 and TH17 cells could lead to better control of local and systemic inflammation. Similarly, CR allows expansion of Tregs in mice and humans by promoting their generation, proliferation, and function, thereby controlling autoimmunity (2712).
Because adherence to dietary changes is not always possible, a proposed alternative approach is “pseudo-starvation,” whereby drugs that regulate immunometabolism mimic fasting (13). A prototypical example is the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. Additionally, metformin, an activator of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) that is used to treat type 2 diabetes and overweight individuals, not only controls glucose tolerance but also has anti-inflammatory actions through AMPK-mediated mTOR inhibition (13). Metformin attenuated EAE induction by restricting the infiltration of mononuclear cells into the central nervous system (CNS) and down-regulating the expression of inflammatory cytokines, inducible NO synthase, cell-adhesion molecules, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and chemokines in TH17 cells (14). These effects were also observed in a study of MS patients with metabolic syndrome (15).
First-line drug treatments for MS (either IFN-β or glatiramer acetate) in combination with metformin provided a statistically significant improvement of disease and reduced CNS lesions. These effects were associated with lowered circulating leptin and TH1 and TH17 inflammatory cytokines and increased numbers of peripheral Tregs (15). Similarly, pioglitazone, an activator of PPAR-γ with antidiabetic effects, also provided a metabolic signal of pseudo-starvation to immune cells from treated MS patients by increasing insulin sensitivity and reducing circulating glucose and leptin levels (15). In EAE, pioglitazone treatment controlled the disease course with reduced CNS infiltrates and decreased inflammatory cytokine production and TH1 and TH17 differentiation (15). Also, it is interesting to note that classical anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs such as salicylate and methotrexate can convey metabolic signals of pseudo-starvation to immune cells through the activation of AMPK (13), along with their classical mechanisms of action. Overall, conferring metabolic signals of pseudo-starvation could be valuable in down-regulating autoinflammatory responses.
It is remarkable that during CR, T cells reprogram their transcriptional signature toward anti-inflammatory properties that limit tissue damage and prolong life span in mice and humans (712). Also, CR induces extensive adaptations in the gut microbiota toward the production of anti-inflammatory metabolites that affect local and systemic immunometabolism (12). Molecules that interact with adipocyte-derived leptin can modulate immune function in various ways depending on metabolic status. For example, neuroendocrine mediators with appetite-stimulating activity such as ghrelin and neuropeptide Y have opposite effects from those of leptin, not only on satiety but also on the peripheral immune responses because they block the secretion of TH1 and TH17 cytokines and suppress EAE (2). Remaining areas for study include the molecular dissection of how single nutrients (i.e., lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins) affect immunological self-tolerance and the temporal window in which CR is an effective therapeutic regimen for obesity-associated autoimmunity.

Acknowledgments

G.M. thanks P. de Candia and A. La Cava for critically reading the manuscript and S. Bruzzaniti for assistance with the figure. G.M. is funded by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM grant 2018/S/5), Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN grant 2017 K55HLC 001), Ministero della Salute (grant RF-2019-12371111), and Ministero dell’Università e Ricerca (INF-ACT grant PE00000007). This work is dedicated to the memory of S. Zappacosta and E. Papa.

Lipids called ceramides may be better predictors of cardiovascular problems than cholesterol

 Stephanie Blendermann, 65, had good reason to worry about heart disease. Three of her sisters died in their 40s or early 50s from heart attacks, and her father needed surgery to bypass clogged arteries. She also suffered from an autoimmune disorder that results in chronic inflammation and boosts the odds of developing cardiovascular illnesses. “I have an interesting medical chart,” says Blendermann, a real estate agent in Prior Lake, Minnesota.

Yet Blendermann’s routine lab results weren’t alarming. At checkups, her low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad,” cholesterol hovered around the 100 milligrams-per-deciliter cutoff for normal values, and her total cholesterol—the good and bad versions combined—remained in the recommended range. “I thought I was cruising along just fine,” she says.

But because Blendermann’s risk was unclear, in late 2021 her doctor decided to refer her to cardiologist Vlad Vasile at the Mayo Clinic. To pin down her susceptibility to atherosclerosis, Vasile prescribed a test for substances Blendermann had never heard of: lipids called ceramides. Long overlooked, they are emerging as powerful alternatives to standard markers of heart disease risk such as LDL cholesterol. Blendermann’s score was moderately high, suggesting that compared with a person with a low score, she was more than twice as likely to suffer a cardiovascular event such as a heart attack. “It woke us up big time,” she says. “The ceramides told me the bigger story.” She began to take cholesterol-lowering drugs and overhauled her diet and exercise regime.

Doctors and drug companies are also warming to the medical possibilities of ceramides. Blendermann is one of just a few thousand people in the United States to have undergone ceramide blood testing, which is only performed by the Mayo Clinic. But later this year, lab testing giant Quest Diagnostics will start to offer the analysis, potentially making it available to many more patients.

The first drugs specifically designed to lower ceramide levels are also on the horizon, with at least two companies hoping to begin clinical trials within the next year or so. And researchers are refining their picture of how these molecules, which account for less than 1% of the lipids in the body, exert such a powerful influence over our physiology. Ceramides are essential for a variety of cellular functions. But a stack of studies also implicates high levels of the molecules in heart disease and illnesses such as diabetes and fatty liver disease, suggesting they may cause havoc as well.

“There is overwhelming evidence that [ceramides] are major driving forces for metabolic dysfunction,” says physiologist Philipp Scherer of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. That makes them valuable for assessing patients’ odds of developing some chronic illnesses—and “an excellent predictor of cardiovascular risk,” says Jeff Meeusen, co-director of cardiovascular laboratory medicine at the Mayo Clinic.

Still, the medical community has not embraced ceramides. Before that happens, cardiologists will have to accept an unfamiliar test and learn how to interpret the results alongside standard risk factors. And before patients start to receive ceramide-lowering drugs, developers will have to show that interfering with compounds fundamental to the body does more good than harm.

UNTIL A LITTLE OVER 30 years ago, ceramides “were not on anyone’s radar screen,” says Yusuf Hannun, a lipidologist at Stony Brook University. The few researchers who did think about the molecules, which are found throughout the body, assumed they were metabolically inert. In 1993, Hannun and his colleagues performed one of the first studies that helped change that perception.

The researchers wanted to find out how a specific immune system molecule spurs malignant cells to commit suicide, protecting against cancer. They discovered the molecule acts through ceramides, suggesting the lipids are important for conveying messages within cells. Soon afterward, a new technique called liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry revolutionized the study of the lipids. The technique, which can sort complex molecular mixtures, revealed that cells carry numerous ceramide varieties—mammals boast more than 200 types—and scientists have been trying to tease out the molecules’ functions ever since.

One place the lipids are essential, says biochemist Ashley Cowart of Virginia Commonwealth University, is the skin, which “has a very diverse ceramide population.” There, they help maintain a solid protective layer—that’s why skin cream–makers load their products with synthetic ceramides or those derived from natural sources. In the skin and elsewhere in the body, cells incorporate different types of ceramides to finetune the fluidity of their outer membranes, which influences cellular functions such as movement, division, and communication. Ceramides also serve as raw materials for the synthesis of other lipids. In short, says lipid biochemist Tony Futerman of the Weizmann Institute of Science, “We can’t survive without ceramides.”

But as researchers have discovered, ceramides can also turn against us. They can infiltrate the lining of blood vessels and usher in LDL cholesterol particles, thus contributing to atherosclerosis. They can inhibit production of nitric oxide, a chemical messenger that relaxes artery walls and helps keep the vessels open. Some ceramides appear to promote insulin resistance, a defect in sugar metabolism characteristic of type 2 diabetes and other conditions. The molecules can also reduce energy production by mitochondria, the organelles that provide cells’ chemical fuel. And the cell suicide that ceramides can trigger, although protective against cancer, may damage healthy tissue in organs such as the heart.

Do-it-all molecules

Ceramides can raise the risk of disease—but when they are present at normal levels, they play critical roles in the body.

  • Seal outer layer of skin

  • Trigger suicide of cells

  • Control cell membrane fluidity

  • Stimulate internal cellular recycling

  • Provide substrates for synthesis of complex lipids

Why do ceramides sometimes go bad? Some are born that way. A particular ceramide’s character depends on the size of its acyl tail, a portion of the molecule that can contain from 12 to more than 26 carbons. “The length of the acyl chain has enormous importance in cell physiology and in cell pathophysiology,” Futerman says. In general, ceramide varieties with long tails are more damaging, and certain molecules with 16-, 18-, or 24-carbon tails may be the most dangerous, for reasons yet unknown.

Ceramides may also become deleterious when our bodies produce too much of them. We break down the fats we eat to yield fatty acids, some of which get shuttled into the pathway that produces ceramides. Our cells normally only manufacture small amounts of ceramides. When our diet contains too much fat, however, synthesis of the molecules booms. “The ceramide pathway is kind of a spillover pathway” for excess fatty acids, Scherer says.

The link to diet likely explains why ceramides surge in so many diet-related metabolic conditions. For instance, researchers using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry have found elevated levels of specific ceramides in patients with obesity, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and several types of cardiovascular conditions, including atherosclerosis, heart failure, and stroke. And rodent studies suggest ceramides may be more than just bystanders. Using chemical treatments or genetic manipulations to cut ceramide levels can protect the animals from many of these ailments.

Some researchers remain unconvinced. “Whether they are causative or a result—in my view, we don’t know,” Futerman says. But physiologist Scott Summers of the University of Utah, who has been studying ceramides for more than 20 years, is one of the researchers who accepts their health effects. “The data for us have been perfectly clear that these are important molecules.”

RESEARCHERS CONTINUE to dig deeper into the biology of ceramides, but they are also eyeing the lipids as potentially valuable biomarkers to gauge a patient’s heart disease risk. The traditional factors for assessing this risk include age, sex, whether the patient smokes or has diabetes, and lab measurements of lipids such as LDL cholesterol. However, these indicators don’t flag everyone who is in danger. In fact, about 15% of people who suffer heart attacks have no standard risk factors at all.

Ceramides may fill the gap. In one 2016 study, clinical pharmacologist Reijo Laaksonen of Zora Biosciences and Tampere University and colleagues analyzed cholesterol and ceramide levels in people with heart disease. Blood ceramides accurately forecast whether these people would die from heart attacks. For example, the abundance of one ceramide variety with a 16-carbon tail was 17% higher in patients who perished than in individuals who survived. In contrast, LDL cholesterol provided no insight—it was higher in the people who didn’t have heart attacks, the scientists reported. Laaksonen and his colleagues, as well as other research teams, have also found that ceramide levels reveal cardiovascular risk in the general population. Overall, studies on more than 100,000 people confirm the predictive power of ceramide testing, Laaksonen says. “It’s very fair to say the ceramide test is the best lipid-based risk marker for cardiovascular events.” Zora has licensed its ceramide scoring algorithms to the Mayo Clinic and Quest.

Meeusen says he and his Mayo Clinic colleagues are generally wary of new medical tests, but that the evidence for ceramide testing was compelling enough to start offering the assays to patients in 2016. The team was also swayed by research suggesting ceramides are involved in cardiovascular disease development. “Ceramides [are] more directly involved with atherosclerosis progression compared to cholesterol,” Meeusen says.

DESPITE THOSE ADVANTAGES, ceramide testing remains limited. Meeusen says the Mayo Clinic performs about 1000 of the analyses per month, mostly in-house requests. In comparison, the clinic performs several times that many standard lipid panels every day.

Other providers are beginning to offer ceramide testing as well, however. For example, most private clinics and about one-half of public hospitals in Finland do so, Laaksonen says. Quest’s imminent entry into the market will further increase availability.

Marc Penn, medical director for Quest’s Cardio Metabolic Endocrine Franchise, says the company decided to offer ceramide tests because they are essentially three tests in one. For most patients today, Penn says, doctors assemble a fragmentary picture of their risk for conditions such as heart disease and diabetes by performing separate tests for lipids, blood sugar, and inflammation. But measuring ceramides provides a comprehensive assessment of a patient’s risk for metabolic diseases because all three factors affect the levels, he says.

Nobody expects ceramide testing to usurp the standard lipid panel. A ceramide test is more complex to perform because it requires mass spectrometry, which is not available in most clinical labs. It is also about 10 times more expensive, running around $100 at the Mayo Clinic. Moreover, it remains to be seen how many practicing cardiologists will opt for the tests even once they’re easier to order.

Neha Pagidipati, a preventive cardiologist at Duke Health, says she is open to the idea. “There is a place for additional measurements to understand who is at risk for cardiovascular disease.” Still, she says that although one of her patients asked about ceramide testing, she has never ordered it and remains unsure about its clinical value. “It needs to be clearer what I’d advise my patients to do with that information.”

Summers worries some recommendations based on ceramide results could be counterproductive. Researchers have noted that blood ceramide levels tend to fall after patients improve their diet, exercise more, or take cholesterol-lowering medications such as statins. Recommending exercise is probably safe, Summers says, but statins “might just be keeping [ceramides] in the liver, where they do a lot of their damage.” What’s missing are data from clinical trials in which researchers test whether interventions such as diet and lipid-lowering treatments not only reduce ceramide levels, but also translate into improved health.

In 2020, Laaksonen and colleagues launched the first trial that will try to address that omission. The researchers are identifying 2000 patients with heart disease who have high levels of ceramides and three other biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. One-half of the patients will enter an intensive program, receiving twice-yearly coaching sessions about diet and exercise and frequent advice from a smartphone app. They will also get tailored recommendations for blood sugar– and lipid-lowering drugs. The other half of the group will receive regular care from their physicians. The researchers plan to follow the participants for 3 years, measuring their rates of cardiovascular events, to determine whether the more aggressive approach provides disease protection in addition to reducing ceramide levels.

ALTHOUGH DIET AND EXERCISE may reduce ceramide levels, some researchers have sought a more direct approach: drugs that disrupt ceramide synthesis or break down the molecules. So far, big pharmaceutical companies’ efforts to develop such drugs have faltered for various reasons. In the early 2010s, for instance, researchers at Eli Lilly and Company identified two compounds that block the enzyme SPT, which catalyzes the first step in ceramide synthesis. These molecules slashed ceramide levels in rodents by 60% to 80%. But they also caused the lining of the animals’ intestines to peel off, leading the company to kill further development.

Biotechs are now picking up where big pharma left off, Scherer says. The company that Summers co-founded in 2016, Centaurus Therapeutics, has crafted a molecule that inhibits DES1, the enzyme that catalyzes the final step in ceramide synthesis. Summers says blocking this enzyme is likely to be safer than targeting SPT, noting that his team deleted the gene for DES1 in rodents without serious side effects. Centaurus is now amassing the animal safety data the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires to greenlight a clinical trial, says Jeremy Blitzer, the company’s chief scientific officer. He wouldn’t speculate on a start date, but says, “We are on a short path to a first dose in humans.”

Another biotech, Aceragen, is probing a different compound that breaks down ceramides and plans to begin a clinical trial within a year. The company intends to test the drug for patients with a rare and often-fatal metabolic condition called Farber disease, which results in abnormally high ceramide levels.

Other researchers are pursuing different strategies for reducing ceramide concentrations, but their work is at an earlier stage. Cardiologist Christian Schulze of the University of Jena and colleagues are trying to replicate the effects of a drug known as myriocin, which cuts ceramide levels dramatically in mice, protecting them from heart failure, slowing atherosclerosis, and improving insulin sensitivity. The catch is that myriocin, which was isolated from a fungus, suppresses the immune system, which once made it a potential treatment for rejection of organ transplants. “The side effects are what it was developed for,” Schulze says. But immune suppression boosts vulnerability to infections.

Using the crystal structure of myriocin’s active site as a template, Schulze and his colleagues have developed several molecules that seem to trigger the same benefits without undermining immunity. They have tested these compounds in cells and plan to move on to rodent studies. Laaksonen and his colleagues have reached about the same stage with their work. They are aiming to reduce ceramide levels with short interfering RNAs, which diminish levels of specific proteins necessary for ceramide synthesis.

Whether these efforts will deliver practical anticeramide drugs remains to be seen. But patients like Blendermann are already benefiting from ceramides’ power as risk markers. After getting her test result, she began to exercise more and eat more green vegetables and leaner meats such as fish and chicken. “That was huge for me. I grew up in a meat and potatoes family,” she says. After 1 year, her ceramide score had plunged from eight to one, the second-lowest risk level. Her other lipids, including LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol, also improved. She credits the ceramide test with making her realize “I’ve got to get busy and get this right.”

https://www.science.org/content/article/straight-heart-mysterious-lipids-may-predict-cardiac-problems-better-cholesterol