Search This Blog

Friday, August 11, 2023

Apyx Upward Trend After Earnings

 On August 11, 2023, Apyx Medical Corporation’s shares have once again started trading, and they are experiencing an upward trend. During this trading period, investors have the opportunity to engage in pre-market trading from 4:00-9:30 a.m. ET and after-hours trading from 4:00-8:00 p.m. ET.

Apyx Medical Corporation recently released their earnings report for the second quarter and the first half of the year, which concluded on June 30, 2023. However, it is worth noting that on the previous trading day, Monday, August 7, 2023, the stock price of Apyx Medical Corporation experienced a decline of -3.99%. It dropped from $4.76 to $4.57.

APYX stock had a mixed performance on August 11, 2023. The stock’s previous close was $4.20, and it opened at $3.60. The day’s range for APYX stock was between $3.60 and $5.02. The stock had a volume of 40,189 shares traded, which is significantly lower than the average volume of 297,404 shares over the past three months. The market capitalization of APYX is $169.3 million.

In terms of earnings growth, APYX had a negative growth rate of -52.00% last year. However, this year, the company has experienced a positive earnings growth rate of +48.06%. Looking ahead, the company is expected to have a steady earnings growth rate of +15.00% over the next five years.

On the revenue front, APYX experienced a decline of -8.26% in revenue growth last year. The company’s price-to-sales ratio is 1.81, indicating that investors are willing to pay a premium for each dollar of sales generated by the company. The price-to-book ratio is 4.50, suggesting that the company’s assets are valued higher than their book value.

https://beststocks.com/apyx-medical-corporations-shares-experience-u/

Disney 'making same mistake as Bud Light' with new woke partnership: former Anheuser-Busch exec

 The Walt Disney Company is facing a Bud Light-style boycott after partnering with a gender-fluid social media influencer to promote women's clothes. 

Former Anheuser-Busch executive Anson Frericks said the move is a "big mistake" and it rivals Bud Light's decision to partner with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. 

"They are making the same mistake as Bud Light, and I think they've been making the same mistake as Bud Light for over a year now," Frericks said on "Varney & Co" Friday. 

"They're making a big mistake getting involved in these controversial political issues that have nothing to do with the mission statement of what they're trying to achieve."

The Walt Disney Co. and TikTok influencer Seann Altman – a biological male who identifies as gender-fluid – have joined forces to market girls' attire on social media in the latest move showing Disney's solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community.

The promotional TikTok video posted for Disney Style, a division of the Walt Disney Co. that promotes its clothing and accessories and offers style inspiration to fans, features Altman dressed in a Minnie Mouse-style getup, complete with a red dress with a Mickey Mouse pattern, a white collar, black tights, a white petticoat and yellow heels. 

"Minnie is ME," Altman, who uses he/him pronouns, wrote on the post. "I fit right in with Mickey and his friends! @disneystyle."

placeholder

The development comes months after a TikTok showed a biological male dressed as the "Fairy Godmother's Apprentice" while selling dresses to kids at Disneyland's Bibbidi Bobbidi Boutique.

The video, posted by a mom documenting her Disneyland trip, garnered millions of views and received mixed reactions across social media at the time.

It also comes on the heels of last year's contentious battle with officials over Florida's Parental Rights in Education bill, nicknamed by critics the "Don't Say Gay" bill. The fight, which prompted Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to revoke Disney's self-governing status, extended into this year as well.

Additionally, the entertainment giant has injected LGBTQ+ elements into its programming, including a non-binary character in this year's animated film "Elemental." 

Frericks argued the reason Disney's latest partnership along with other woke moves are a "big mistake" is due to the company putting politics over its mission.

"They're making a big mistake getting involved in these controversial political issues that have nothing to do with the mission statement of what they're trying to achieve," he said. 

The Walt Disney Company did not immediately return Fox News Digital's request for comment.

As of Tuesday, Disney shares trail behind the S&P 500 on a year-to-date and 12-month basis. 

The broad S&P 500 index has experienced an over 17.6% rise from the start of 2023 as of Tuesday’s market close. Comparatively, the value of Disney shares have seen little change, dropping just under 1% in the same timeframe. 

Over the past 12-months, Disney’s stock has gone down 18.5%; meanwhile, the S&P has climbed about 9.1%. 

"You go back one year, what does them getting involved in the parental rights bill in Florida have to do with them being the world's premier family entertainment company?" Frericks questioned. "It has to do with nothing. If you take a look at it, they had an approval rating of 77%. People loved what Disney was doing. It cratered to 33% after that." 

"Even Disney, they had their earnings yesterday and they missed their revenue numbers yesterday. Why? Because millions of subscribers stopped subscribing to Disney Plus, their theme park attendance is down," Frericks added.

On Wednesday, the Walt Disney Company also released it's third quarter earnings which showed mixed results for the entertainment company. 

Disney reported $22.33 billion in revenue, compared analyst expectations of $22.5 billion. The company did report $.265 billion in one-time charges and impairments, bringing the company to a quarterly net loss of $460 million from a $1.41 billion net income.  

Disney's earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.03 per share, adjusted, compared to the $0.95 expected, according to Refinitiv.  

While the company saw a 13% increase in revenue relating to the parks, experiences and products division, domestic parks like Walt Disney World in Florida saw an attendance slowdown.

Wednesday's earnings also showed continued losses in Disney+ subscribers, reporting 146.1 million verses the 151.1 million expected

Frericks argued that Disney's struggles relate to engaging in politics rather than focusing on its mission to be a premier family-friendly entertainment company. 

While some brands such as Ben & Jerry's can engage the political sphere with little consequence, Frericks emphasized the need for companies to stick to their mission in order to see success.

"Mission statements are very, very important for a company. What do they do? They set what the purpose of the company is and what it's trying to achieve," Frericks said. "Those clear mission statements, they kind of align investors and employees with what the company is trying to achieve about the products and services that it's trying to deliver to customers to increase shareholder value."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/disney-making-same-mistake-as-bud-light-with-new-woke-partnership-former-anheuser-busch-exec-warns

RFK Jr. Renews Demand For Secret Service Protection After Assassination Of Ecuadorian Candidate

  by Savannah Hulsey Pointer via The Epoch Times,

The 2024 presidential campaign of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. renewed calls for President Joe Biden to provide protection for the candidate.

Mr. Kennedy's campaign manager Dennis Kucinich publicly called on President Biden to order Secret Service protection for Mr. Kennedy following the assassination of an Ecuadorian anti-corruption presidential candidate.

Ecuador presidential candidate Fernando Villavicencio who recently promised to get rid of corruption and lock up the country's drug runners, was shot and killed at a political rally in Quito, the capital.

Mr. Villavicencio, 59, was killed on Aug. 9, less than two weeks before a special presidential election. He was known for speaking out against drug gangs, and while he wasn't a front-runner, his death has caused increased concern about organized crime.

"The killing of Mr. Villavicencio proves how volatile the political climate has become," Mr. Kucinich said in a press release sent to The Epoch Times.

"Yesterday the FBI confronted a man who had threatened President Biden, an incident that led to the man being shot dead by government agents."

Mr. Kucinich, a 16-year member of Congress, continued:

"Mr. Kennedy has met all criteria for protection. The only conceivable reason he is being denied is because of a conscious decision by the White House to deny him security and [expletive] the consequences."

Previous Calls for Protection

Late last month, Mr. Kennedy alleged the White House had denied his request for Secret Service protection for three months: "Since the assassination of my father in 1968, candidates for president are provided Secret Service protection," Mr. Kennedy wrote on X, previously known as Twitter. "But not me."

The Democrat candidate said the Biden administration has turned down his request and said Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas reportedly told his campaign: "I have determined that Secret Service protection for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not warranted at this time."

"Our campaign's request included a 67-page report from the world's leading protection firm, detailing unique and well-established security and safety risks aside from commonplace death threats," said Mr. Kennedy, noting that it was his understanding that the "typical turnaround time for pro forma protection requests" is about two weeks.

According to the United States Secret Service website, the agency does not provide protection to non-incumbent presidential candidates until 120 days before the general election. Mr. Kennedy would be eligible for Secret Service protection in July 2024, per Secret Service guidelines.

Mr. Kennedy's father, the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, was assassinated in a Los Angeles hotel during the 1968 presidential campaign. Officials have attributed his death to communist sympathizer and pro-Palestinian activist Sirhan Sirhan, but the 2024 presidential candidate has long maintained that he believes other individuals were involved.

Before President William McKinley was assassinated in 1901, Secret Service agents did not protect presidential candidates. After his death, however, the federal agency began protecting sitting presidents. When President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, Congress expanded the Secret Service's responsibilities to include the protection of presidential and vice presidential candidates, according to its website.

Ecuadorian Candidate's Death

Mr. Villavicencio's death comes amid a marked increase in violence in Ecuador, fueled by the growing presence of drug cartels in the country, with escalating drug trafficking and violent killings. It's been a central issue in the presidential campaign.

Last week, Mr. Villavicencio mentioned that a drug trafficking gang leader had threatened him and his crew. The candidate was married and is survived by five children.

"For his memory and his fight, I assure you that this crime will not remain unpunished," Mr. Lasso wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Aug. 9.

"Organized crime has gone very far, but all the weight of the law will fall on them."

The president of Ecuador stated he would convene a meeting of the nation's senior security officials.

Mr. Villavicencio, who served as a lawmaker until the dissolution of the Ecuadorian National Assembly in May, was one of eight presidential candidates in the Aug. 20 election. He was the candidate for the Build Ecuador Movement. Opinion polls placed him fifth among the eight candidates, with approximately 7.5 percent support. He was renowned as a candidate against corruption.

Mr. Villavicencio was a union member at the state-owned hydrocarbon company Petroecuador before transitioning into journalism.

He began his journalism career with El Universo, one of the country's largest daily newspapers, and was known for combating corruption. Throughout his tenure, he uncovered extensive instances of government misconduct. In 2015, he exposed Ecuador's clandestine operations that spied on journalists and political opponents, including Julian Assange, inside the embassy.

He spoke out against the previous socialist president, Rafael Correa. In one case, Mr. Villavicencio criticized Mr. Correa for making deals with oil companies like Chinese-regime-owned PetroChina that cost Ecuador almost $5 million in overpayments.

The White House did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times's request for comment.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rfk-jr-renews-demand-secret-service-protection-after-assassination-ecuadorian-candidate

IRS Launches Tax Crackdown Targeting Employee Stock Option Plans

 by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) said it is taking "swift and aggressive action" targeting compliance issues related to Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), which are retirement arrangements where employees become partial owners of their company by owning its stock.

As part of its broader thrust to increase tax collections, the IRS said in an Aug. 9 alert that it had identified numerous compliance issues associated with ESOPs, including certain arrangements that are potentially abusive and can amount to prohibited transactions.

Since an ESOP can borrow funds from employers or third parties to purchase shares of the employer, ESOPs can be complex arrangements. In light of this complexity, the IRS said it's taking tougher enforcement strategies to make sure that employers who sponsor an ESOP are complying with tax laws.

Some of the compliance problems flagged by the IRS include valuation issues with employee stock, prohibited allocation of shares to disqualified persons, and failure to follow tax rules for ESOP loans that cause such loans to be unlawful.

'Swift and Aggressive Action'

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said that, prior to recent legislation that included a massive $80 billion funding boost for the tax agency, the IRS was unable to keep up with increasingly complicated ways that some taxpayers might use to avoid paying taxes.

"The IRS is now taking swift and aggressive action to close this gap," Mr. Werfel said in a statement. "Part of that includes alerting higher-income taxpayers and businesses to compliance issues and aggressive schemes involving complex or questionable transactions, including those involving ESOPs."

Besides compliance issues related to ESOPs, the IRS has identified instances where tax advisors promote potentially abusive arrangements related to such plans. For instance, certain schemes have come to the attention of the tax agency that involves a company establishing a "management" S corporation.

This S corporation's stock is entirely owned by an ESOP with the primary intention of diverting taxable business earnings to the ESOP. The S corporation claims to extend loans to business proprietors equivalent to the business's income, aiming to avoid taxation on those earnings.

"The IRS disagrees with how taxpayers interpret this transaction and emphasizes that these purported loans should be taxable income to the business owners," the IRS said in a statement, meaning that it considers such arrangements to be potentially abusive.

Such transactions also play a role in whether the ESOP satisfies certain tax law requirements, with the possible consequence that the management company could lose its status as an S corporation.

The IRS said that, over the coming year, it will use a range of compliance tools—including more audits—to address ESOP-related compliance issues.

Besides vowing to crack down on compliance issues related to ESOPs through tougher enforcement, the IRS also asked people to report individuals who promote improper and abusive tax schemes, and to tell on tax return preparers who may intentionally prepare improper returns.

"Businesses and individual taxpayers should seek advice from an independent and trusted tax professional instead of promoters focused on marketing questionable transactions that could lead to bigger trouble," Mr. Werfel said.

Other Policy Shifts

In a recent move that represented a shift in IRS policy, the tax agency announced it would be putting an end to most unannounced agent visits to taxpayers' homes.

The move, which was announced at the end of July and went into effect immediately, reversed decades of policy that saw IRS revenue officers knock on doors of taxpayers' homes without forewarning in a bid to resolve delinquent tax matters.

The IRS said the reason for the change was to lower the risk that anxiety-provoking surprise home visits by tax enforcement agents could spiral out of control, posing a hazard to both taxpayers and agency field officers.

Unannounced door knocks at homes and businesses were found to be high-risk encounters, the IRS said, with agents routinely facing "hazards and uncertainty" when making surprise visits.

"These visits created extra anxiety for taxpayers already wary of potential scam artists," Mr. Werfel said in a statement. "At the same time, the uncertainty around what IRS employees faced when visiting these homes created stress for them as well. This is the right thing to do and the right time to end it."

Instead of unannounced door knocks, IRS agents will send letters to taxpayers to schedule in-person meetings.

There will still be rare instances where unannounced visits will occur, including summonses and subpoenas.

Also, the IRS recently sent out a warning to taxpayers that it had identified a new tax scam that tries to trick people into believing the government owes them money.

Unlike some scams that involve online activity, the new scheme involves a physical mailing that comes in a cardboard envelope from a delivery service. Inside envelope is a letter on IRS masthead that fraudulently claims that the notice relates to an unclaimed tax refund.

While dangling the prospect of obtaining unclaimed tax refund dollars, the letter asks taxpayers to provide sensitive personal information, including detailed photographs of drivers' licenses.

The IRS warned that the data the scammers are trying to obtain could be used to try and get a tax refund or other sensitive financial information.

The agency urged taxpayers to verify the authenticity of any communication they receive and seek official information directly from the IRS.

Prior Warnings

Every year, the IRS puts out a compilation of tax scams it calls the "Dirty Dozen" list as a warning to taxpayers. These scams target individuals and tax professionals, aiming to deceive and defraud unsuspecting victims.

One common scam on the list involves fraudulent claims for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), where scammers target individuals by promoting large refunds associated with this credit. These promoters use misleading advertisements on the radio and the internet, providing inaccurate information about eligibility and computation of the credit. Some of these schemes are designed solely to collect personal information for the purpose of identity theft.

Another prevalent scam is phishing and smishing, where individuals receive fake communications posing as legitimate tax and financial organizations such as the IRS and state agencies. Unsolicited text messages (smishing) and emails (phishing) are used to trick recipients into divulging valuable personal and financial information, putting them at risk of identity theft.

The IRS says taxpayers should note that the agency mostly communicates through regular mail and never initiates contact via email, text, or social media regarding tax bills or refunds.

Additionally, scammers try to deceive taxpayers by posing as helpful third parties offering assistance in creating IRS Online Accounts. In reality, these offers are fraudulent, as taxpayers can establish their own online accounts directly through the official IRS website.

The IRS cautions that falling victim to these scams can expose individuals to potential identity theft and other fraudulent activities.

https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/irs-launches-tax-crackdown-targeting-employee-stock-option-plans

Rand Paul: "No Clearer Case Of Perjury In The History Of Government Testimony Than Fauci"

 by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Senator Rand Paul told Fox News Thursday that in the case of Anthony Fauci “I don’t think there’s ever been a clearer case of perjury in the history of government testimony, and I don’t say that lightly.”

Paul explained that Fauci “said adamantly that the government never funded this [coronavirus] gain-of-function research.”

“We now have the Government Accountability Office, the GAO, has admitted that the funding came from the NIH,” Paul continued, adding “We have the acting director [Lawrence] Tabak, of the NIH, admitting it in writing that it came from the NIH.”

Paul further noted that “the smoking gun… is Fauci in private saying the opposite of what he was saying in public when he was publicly telling me that absolutely, we do not fund gain-of-function research in China.”

“He says privately we are suspicious that the virus has been manipulated and we are suspicious because we know they are doing gain-of-function research. He then goes on to describe the research, and it’s exactly the research that the NIH funded,” the Senator urged.

Paul explained why he is ramping up his criminal referral, noting that “we have an incredibly partisan Attorney General [Merrick] Garland, who is refusing to act, so I’ve taken the extraordinary step of actually going to the local U.S. attorney in D.C. to see if he will act.”

“The problem is there are partisans littered throughout the legal system, and people are seeing this. You don’t get prosecuted if you’re a Democrat under this administration, no matter what you do,” Paul warned.

Watch:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rand-paul-no-clearer-case-perjury-history-government-testimony-fauci

Regeneron’s High-Dose Eylea Allows for Longer Dosing Intervals in wAMD

 Topline, two-year data from the pivotal PULSAR trial showed that at an 8-mg dose of Regeneron’s Eylea (aflibercept) can be administered at longer intervals without sacrificing vision gains in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration, the company announced Thursday.

The results come as Regeneron awaits the FDA’s verdict on its Biologics License Application (BLA) seeking approval for the higher dose level of its blockbuster eye injection. Eylea is approved for the treatment of various eye diseases, including wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) and diabetic retinopathy, but its current label only allows 2-mg doses.

The FDA in June rejected the BLA, citing manufacturing issues, but in its second-quarter earnings report last week Regeneron announced it had spoken with the third-party contract manufacturer and expects to submit additional information to the regulator within the month. Regeneron anticipates a decision within the third quarter.

In PULSAR, a double-masked trial with 1,009 patients enrolled, Eylea was given at its investigational 8-mg dose at 12-week or 16-week intervals. As an active control, the study used the drug’s approved 8-week dosing regimen. All patients were also given the three initial monthly doses per Eylea’s label.

Throughout the trial, patients were allowed to shorten or extend their dosing intervals if they met pre-specified criteria. However, through 96 weeks of follow-up, PULSAR found that 88% of patients who received their Eylea doses at least 12 weeks apart were able to maintain this treatment regimen. Meanwhile, 70% of those who were dosed at least 16 weeks apart were able to stay on this schedule through two years of follow-up.

In addition, 71% of PULSAR patients qualified for even longer treatment intervals, with 47% and 28% meeting the criteria to receive Eylea doses at least 20 weeks and 24 weeks apart, respectively.

“Through one and two years of treatment, aflibercept 8 mg has repeatedly demonstrated unprecedented durability in maintaining clinically meaningful outcomes with extended dosing regimens for patients with retinal disease,” George Yancopoulos, Regeneron’s president and chief scientific officer, said in a statement.

These data could help Eylea retake some market share back from Roche’s Vabysmo (faricimab), which has emerged as a strong competitor since winning the FDA’s approval for wAMD and diabetic macular edema in January 2022. A key competitive advantage of Vabysmo is its more flexible dosing interval, which for some patients can extend to up to four months depending on their physicians, according to Roche’s website for the medication.

In the first half of this year, Vabysmo brought in nearly $1.1 billion. While Eylea’s second-quarter sales came in at $1.5 billion, this nevertheless represents a 7% revenue hit compared with the same period during the previous year.

https://www.biospace.com/article/regeneron-s-high-dose-eylea-allows-for-longer-dosing-intervals/

SCOTUS Blocks $6B Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Settlement

 The Supreme Court of the United States on Thursday granted the Department of Justice’s application for a stay on Purdue Pharma’s $6 billion bankruptcy settlement plan shielding the Sackler family from lawsuits related to the opioid epidemic.

In the short order, SCOTUS also put any other bankruptcy proceedings against Purdue on hold. The court will schedule a hearing in December 2023 to discuss the legality of a bankruptcy settlement plan reached with state and local governments that traded the Sacklers’ immunity from civil lawsuits for a contribution of up to $6 billion.

The issue at hand is whether U.S. bankruptcy laws provide protections for the Sackler family, even though they had not personally declared bankruptcy themselves. The Sacklers were previously the owners of Purdue who are alleged to have fueled the opioid-addiction crisis and required a release from liability as a condition of paying the settlement.

Purdue first filed for bankruptcy in September 2019, days after it reached a tentative agreement with approximately half of the states to pay up to $12 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits. At the center of the cases is OxyContin (oxycodone), Purdue’s semi-synthetic opioid painkiller that the company marketed aggressively, leading to a spike in addiction throughout the country.

In its Chapter 11 filing, Purdue outlined the terms of its settlement deal noting that it will form and contribute all its assets to a new trust, which will primarily be for the benefit of claimants. Purdue also pledged to contribute “tens of millions of doses” of opioid overdose treatments at little or no cost.

The Sacklers have since tried to shirk responsibility for the opioid epidemic. In December 2020, the family appeared in a virtual hearing and apologized to victims of the crisis but deferred the blame to Purdue’s management. Three weeks earlier, the company had pleaded guilty to three criminal charges related to the crisis.

In August 2021, David Sackler, heir to the family, said that while they believe they have a “moral responsibility” to help in the fight against the opioid epidemic, they will not give billions of dollars to settle lawsuits unless they are afforded legal protections.

A month later, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved Purdue’s bankruptcy plan of dissolving the company and transferring its assets to a new trust, which has no involvement from the Sacklers whatsoever. Critics of the decision say that it will protect the Sackler family from any future liability related to the opioid crisis.

The Department of Justice has also stepped in and in September 2021 filed an appeal to block the bankruptcy plan.

https://www.biospace.com/article/scotus-temporarily-blocks-6b-purdue-pharma-bankruptcy-plan-/