Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Quest Adds Blood Biomarker Test to Assess Risk and Help Aid Diagnosis of Alzheimer's

 Quest Diagnostics (NYSE: DGX), a leader in diagnostic information services, today announced the launch of a new blood biomarker test for phosphorylated tau 217, or p-tau217. P-tau217 is a biomarker associated with Alzheimer's Disease (AD), supported by research as useful for an early diagnosis of AD.

The test is the latest addition to the AD-Detect™ portfolio of blood tests for assessing the risk of Alzheimer's Disease, which also includes testing for an array of AD biomarkers, including p-tau181 and amyloid beta (AB) proteins, as well as Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) isoform and plasma testing, for patients with cognitive impairment. With a physician's test order, patients may provide a blood draw for testing from any of Quest's 2,000 patient service centers in the United States. The test is expected to be available for ordering on April 26, 2024.

Quest Diagnostics continually seeks to expand access for patients and providers to innovations in the field of dementia, including AD, through advanced diagnostic solutions. The addition of p-tau217 to Quest's existing portfolio of neurology testing supports a comprehensive offering, including not only the groundbreaking use of blood tests to evaluate risk of AD, but also cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests to help providers assess amyloid beta 42, tau and ApoE genetic risk status.

https://newsroom.questdiagnostics.com/2024-04-22-Quest-Diagnostics-Adds-p-tau217-Blood-Biomarker-Testing-to-Suite-of-Services-Designed-to-Assess-Risk-and-Help-Aid-Diagnosis-of-Alzheimers-Disease

'Report on H5N1 in Cattle, Cats Increases Concern of Spillover Event'

 Cows infected with H5N1 avian influenza had mild illness characterized by a drop in milk production, but cats fed raw milk experienced severe systemic disease with high mortality, researchers found.

The findings, published in CDC's Emerging Infectious Diseasesopens in a new tab or window, come from an analysis of samples from farms in Kansas and Texas taken in mid-March. They suggest cow-to-cow transmission of H5N1, and raise concerns about consumption of raw milk as a potential transmission mechanism, Eric Burrough, DVM, PhD, of Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine in Ames, Iowa, and colleagues reported.

"The recurring nature of global ... H5N1 virus outbreaks and detection of spillover events in a broad host range is concerning and suggests increasing virus adaptation in mammals," the researchers wrote. "Surveillance of [highly pathogenic avian influenza] HPAI viruses in domestic production animals, including cattle, is needed to elucidate influenza virus evolution and ecology and prevent cross-species transmission."

Veterinarians in the U.S. first sounded the alarm on an odd illness affecting dairy cattle in the panhandle region of northern Texas in February 2024. These cows had an abrupt drop in milk production, and what they did produce was thickened and creamy yellow in appearance, similar to colostrum, the milk produced in the first days after a delivery. The cows had reduced appetite, but the majority recovered within 10 to 14 days, the researchers reported.

By early March, similar cases were soon reported in dairy cattle in southwestern Kansas and northeastern New Mexico, and at least one dairy farm in Texas reported deaths among cats that drank raw milk from sick cows.

In mid-March, the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory received samples from dairy cattle in Texas and Kansas, and two dead cats from a Texas dairy farm. Samples tested positive for H5N1, prompting the U.S. Department of Agriculture to issue a press releaseopens in a new tab or window not long thereafter.

Disease in Cows

Burrough and colleagues reported that milk and mammary gland samples had very low cycle threshold (Ct) values for H5N1, indicating a high viral load.

Some, but not all, animals had firm mammary glands, typical of mastitis, and the chief microscopic lesion seen in affected cows was acute multifocal neutrophilic mastitis, they reported.

While the mode of transmission isn't known, cow-to-cow transmission has been suggested because cattle herds in Michigan, Idaho, and Ohio that received infected animals have also tested positive for H5N1, according to the study.

Burrough and colleagues wrote that feed contaminated with feces from infected wild birds is the most likely source of infection on diary farms.

"Although the exact source of the virus is unknown, migratory birds (Anseriformes and Charadriiformes) are likely sources because the Texas panhandle region lies in the Central Flyway, and those birds are the main natural reservoir for avian influenza viruses," they wrote.

They noted that influenza A-related declines in milk production have occurred among dairy cattle in the past: in Japan in 1949, and in Europe in 1997-1998 and 2005-2006. "The sporadic occurrence of clinical disease in dairy cattle worldwide might be the result of changes in subclinical infection rates and the presence or absence of sufficient baseline [influenza A virus] IAV antibodies in cattle to prevent infection," the researchers wrote.

Disease in Cats

Among about 24 domestic cats that were fed milk from sick cows on a north Texas dairy farm, more than half became sick and died in mid-March.

They had signs of systemic influenza infection, including depressed mental state, stiff body movements, ataxia, blindness, circling, and copious oculonasal discharge, the researchers reported. Neurological examination found no menace reflexes and pupillary light responses with weak blink response.

Two animals were available for postmortem analysis. Brain and lung samples had low Ct values, again indicating a high viral load in these animals, they reported.

They also found mild hemorrhages in the subcutaneous tissues over the dorsal skull, along with multifocal meningeal hemorrhages in the cerebrum. Microscopic lesions were consistent with severe systemic virus infection, including evidence of meningoencephalitis, pneumonia, myocarditis, and chorioretinitis.

Burrough and colleagues called the findings of blindness and chorioretinitis "unique," suggesting that "further investigation into potential ocular manifestations of HPAI H5N1 virus infection in cats might be warranted."

While eating dead wild birds can't be ruled out as the source of transmission to cats, "the known consumption of unpasteurized milk and colostrum from infected cows and the high amount of virus nucleic acid within the milk make milk and colostrum consumption a likely route of exposure," the researchers wrote.

"Therefore, our findings suggest cross-species mammal-to-mammal transmission of HPAI H5N1 virus and raise new concerns regarding the potential for virus spread within mammal populations," they concluded.

Burrough and coauthors added that hemagglutinin and neuraminidase sequences from both cows and cats at different Texas farms had "a notable degree of similarity," strongly suggesting a "shared origin."

"Further research, case series investigations, and surveillance data are needed to better understand and inform measures to curtail the clinical effects, shedding, and spread of HPAI viruses among mammals," they wrote.

The H5N1 clade involved in this outbreak is 2.3.4.4b, which was first reported in the U.S. in late 2021, the researchers noted. It has been involved in other recent reports of mammal spillover in the U.S., including in seals in New Englandopens in a new tab or window and a host of terrestrial animalsopens in a new tab or window including 50 red foxes, six skunks, four raccoons, two bobcats, two opossums, one coyote, one fisher, and a gray fox. An outbreak of H5N1 among farmed mink in Spainopens in a new tab or window also raised concerns in 2022.

Disclosures

The authors reported no financial conflicts of interest.

Primary Source

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowBurrough ER, et al "Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus infection in domestic dairy cattle and cats, United States, 2024" Emerg Infect Dis 2024; DOI: 10.3201/eid3007.240508.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/uritheflu/109885

Poll: Election-Shifting Percentage Of Voters Admit To Illegal Voting In 2020

 For the past three years, the corporate press and numerous officials in the Biden White House have asserted there is no evidence widespread voter fraud occurred during the 2020 presidential election. Some have even gone so far as to call it the “most secure” election in U.S. history.

However, a poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports — a survey I wrote with a team of experts at the Heartland Institute and discussed last week on Tucker Carlson’s show — not only calls into question that often-repeated claim, it shows the opposite could have been true. According to its findings, voter fraud, especially fraud related to mail-in ballots, may have been common in the 2020 election. This conclusion isn’t based on questionable allegations but on voters’ own responses to the poll questions.

The Heartland Institute/Rasmussen survey, which was conducted from Nov. 30 to Dec. 6, asked likely voters who cast ballots in 2020 questions about fraudulent activities, without telling them such actions were a form of voter fraud. The results were stunning. One in five people who voted by mail admitted to engaging in at least one kind of potential voter fraud, seriously calling into question the security of widespread mail-in balloting.

For example, one question asked, “During the 2020 election, did you cast a mail-in ballot in a state where you were no longer a permanent resident?” Such an action nearly always constitutes fraud. Incredibly, 17 percent of voters said “yes.”

Another question asked if “a friend or family member” filled out a respondent’s ballot, “in part or in full,” on behalf of the respondent, which is illegal in some states. Nineteen percent of mail-in voters who responded to the survey answered “yes.”

Even more remarkably, 21 percent of respondents admitted to filling out a ballot for someone they know, such as a spouse or child, and 17 percent confessed to signing a ballot or ballot envelope “on behalf of a friend or family member, with or without his or her permission” — both potential forms of illegal voting.

Taken together, these results strongly indicate fraud and illegal voting heavily affected mail-in balloting in the 2020 election. Even if a fraction of the people admitting wrongdoing here are actually guilty, that would still equal the electoral margin for 2020.

It’s an incredibly important finding since that contest involved more mail-in ballots than any other election in U.S. history. Election officials report that of 159 million ballots cast in 2020, more than 68 million were submitted by mail, about 43 percent of the total. In addition, as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab noted, “the dramatic increase in the raw number of absentee ballots cast was accompanied by a significant decrease in the overall absentee rejection rate for the country: from 0.96 percent in 2016 to 0.79 percent in 2020.”

If the recent Heartland Institute/Rasmussen survey is accurate and one in five ballots were, in fact, fraudulent, that would suggest greater than 13 million ballots should not have been counted nationwide in 2020. That’s far more than the margin of victory for President Biden in the popular vote, about 7 million.

As troubling as these findings are, however, additional questions in the Heartland Institute/Rasmussen survey suggest voter fraud and illegal voting may have been even worse than the one-in-five figure suggests. For instance, 8 percent of all respondents — not just those who voted by mail — said they were offered “pay” or “reward” in return for voting.

Equally disturbing, 10 percent of voters said “a friend, family member, co-worker, or other acquaintance” admitted to them that he or she “cast a mail-in ballot in 2020 in a state other than his or her state of permanent residence.” Eleven percent said that “a friend, family member, co-worker, or other acquaintance” admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot.

These questions could indicate far more fraud occurred than anyone previously thought.

It’s also worth remembering that presidents are not elected by a national popular vote but through the Electoral College. The three states in which Trump and Biden were closest — Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin — were all decided by fewer than 21,000 votes.

Biden narrowly won each of those contests, but if he had lost those three states, he wouldn’t have reached the 270 electoral vote threshold needed to win the presidency. Instead, the Electoral College vote would have been a tie, pushing the decision to the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. With such razor-thin margins and the results of the recent Heartland/Rasmussen voter fraud survey in mind, it’s hard not to wonder how big of an effect fraud truly had on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

But regardless of how much fraud occurred, one thing is absolutely certain: States must take appropriate legislative action to protect the integrity of the next presidential election so that all Americans can be confident that the winner of the 2024 campaign will capture the White House fair and square.

There is already substantial evidence that voter fraud could play a significant role in 2024. Another survey conducted in March and April by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen shows that 28 percent of likely voters now say they would commit at least one form of illegal voting during the 2024 election, “if given the opportunity.” Interestingly, respondents’ willingness to commit fraud was similar among Republicans, Democrats, and independents.

There is some good news, however. The threat of voter fraud can be limited dramatically by changing mail-in ballot rules. Voters who are physically able to cast their ballots in person should be required to do so, or they should be mandated to have their ballot signature notarized, significantly reducing opportunities for fraud. Lawmakers could fund public programs to increase access to free notaries for those who need them.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, just three states require notaries for mail-in ballots — Mississippi, Missouri, and Oklahoma. Only nine additional states mandate that a voter obtain one or more non-notary witness signatures when casting a ballot by mail. Most states require neither a witness nor a notary to verify signatures.

Lawmakers must ensure widespread voter fraud does not happen in future elections. That can only occur if mail-in voting systems are radically improved. Time is running out for legislators to fix these major threats to American self-government.


Apollo Hit With Suit Alleging "Widespread Fraudulent Human Life Wagering Conspiracy"

 Apollo Global Management has been entangled in a scandalous lawsuit and accused of acquiring illegal life insurance policies on senior citizens through a complex web of shell trusts. 

The company allegedly used an affiliate, Financial Credit Investment, to manage about a $20 billion portfolio of stranger-originated life insurance policies, effectively engaging in what the lawsuit claims:

"In short, Apollo has been carrying out a widespread fraudulent human life wagering conspiracy designed to not only hide its involvement, but to create the false appearance that the policies it owns are somehow legitimate." 

The complaint continues:

"Worse still, when Apollo senses a claim is going to be brought, it attempts to dissolve its shell entities to give itself yet another layer of protection."

This scheme was designed to give the policies the illusion of legitimacy. Martha Barotz's estate initiated the legal action filed in Delaware's Chancery Court last Friday. It raises serious questions about Apollo's ethical practices.

"In this way, the senior citizens have no idea who owns a policy on their life, and who wants them dead," the suit said, adding, "Apollo was fraudulently and illegally using these shell entities to perpetuate human life wagers not only on the life of Mrs. Barotz, but on the lives of hundreds (if not thousands) of other senior citizens."

Bloomberg first reported on the lawsuit. Responding to BBG's note, Joshua Rosner, a  Graham Fisher & Co. managing partner, wrote on X that Apollo's actions are "mind-bending and horrifying." 

"Apollo should have its insurance licenses pulled in every state by the @naic. They predate retirees and pensioners through pension risk transfers and now we find they take out life insurance policies against seniors. @AARP," Rosner said. 

Rosner asks one heck of a question: "With Apollo managing hospitals, nursing & hospice facilities & also the retirement accounts of seniors, are they essentially taking a straddle position on seniors by buying life insurance policies on them?" 

One X user asks: "Did they take out life insurance on Alfred Villalobos and Jeffrey Epstein?" 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/apollo-slapped-lawsuit-alleging-widespread-fraudulent-human-life-wagering

Contineum started at Buy at 3 sell siders

 

TodayInitiatedStifelBuy$29
TodayInitiatedRBC Capital MktsOutperform$30
TodayInitiatedMorgan StanleyOverweight$25

Geron cut to Neutral from Outperform by Baird

 Target $4.50

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=GERN&ty=c&ta=1&p=d

Predictive Progress with Development of First-of-Its-Kind Intranasal Flu Vaccine

 Predictive Oncology Inc. (NASDAQ: POAI), a leader in AI-driven drug discovery and biologics, announces a collaboration with FluGen to bring a first-of-its-kind intranasal flu vaccine to market, as part of a $6.2 million Phase 2B grant awarded by the United States Department of Defense (DoD).

“Predictive Oncology will play a critical role in helping to make our M2SR flu vaccine more stable and sustainable as we advance our clinical trials,” says Paul Radspinner, President & Chief Executive Officer of FluGen. “The project looks to hold tremendous promise.”

Through a proprietary design of experiments, the Predictive Oncology biologics team will be developing a formulation that is soluble and stable in a refrigerated state, which is a vital part in the drug development process. Most importantly, this addresses the need for a longer vaccine shelf-life to support global distribution including remote locations. Predictive Oncology’s biologics capabilities are uniquely suited to help achieve maximum stability, one of the initial critical milestones.

“We are excited to advance these efforts for an intranasal flu vaccine that will be unlike any other on the market,” notes Larry DeLucas, Senior Vice President of Biologics at Predictive Oncology. “Utilizing our exceptional technology and supported by our team of leading scientists, this work will allow FluGen to continue its clinical trials with greater potential to bring a more advanced and stable flu vaccine to patients.”

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/04/30/2872779/37244/en/Predictive-Oncology-Announces-Significant-Progress-with-FluGen-In-the-Development-of-First-of-Its-Kind-Intranasal-Flu-Vaccine.html