Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Missing Puzzle Piece in Inexplicable "Strength" Of US Consumers: $700 B In "Phanton Debt"

Yesterday we discussed the latest consumer credit data, which revealed that the amount of credit card debt across the US has hit a new record high of $1.337 trillion (even though it appears to have finally hit a brick wall, barely rising in April by the smallest amount since the covid crash), even as the savings rate has tumbled to an all time low.

To be sure, credit card debt is just a small portion (~6%) of the total household debt stack: as the next chart from the latest NY Fed consumer credit report shows, the bulk, or 70%, of US household debt is in the form of mortgages, followed by student loans, auto loans, credit card debt, home equity credit and various other forms. Altogether, the total is a massive $17.5 trillion in total household debt.

But staggering as the mountain of household debt may be, at least we know how huge the problem is; after all the data is public. What is far more dangerous - because we have no clue about its size - is what Bloomberg calls "Phantom Debt", and we have repeatedly called Buy Now, Pay Later debt. How much of that kind of debt is out there is largely a guess.

Let's back up: the topic of Buy Now, Pay Later, or installment debt, is hardly new: we have covered it extensively in the past year, as this selection of articles reveals:

But while it is easy to ensnare young, incomeless Americans into the net of installment debt where they will rot as the next generation of debt slaves for the rest of their lives, there is an even more sinister side to this extremely popular form of debt which allows consumers to split purchases into smaller installments: as Bloomberg reports in a lengthy expose on installment debt, the major companies that provide these so called “pay in four” products, such as Affirm Holdings, Klarna Bank and Block’s Afterpay, don’t report those loans to credit agencies. That's why Buy Now/Pay Later credit has earned a far more ominous nickname:

It's hard enough for central bankers and Wall Street traders to make sense of the post-pandemic economy with the data available to them. At Wells Fargo & Co., senior economist Tim Quinlan is particularly spooked by the “phantom debt” that he can't see.

Which is not to say that we have no idea how much "phantom debt" is out there: according to the report, it is projected to reach almost $700 billion globally by 2028, and yet, time and again, the companies that issue it have resisted calls for greater disclosure, even as the market has grown each year since at least 2020. That, as Bloomberg accurately warns, is masking a complete picture of the financial health of American households, which is crucial for everyone from global central banks to US regional lenders and multinational businesses.

In fact, the recent explosion in installment debt may explain why the US consumer remains so resilient even when most conventional economic metrics suggest consumers should be struggling: "Consumer spending in the world’s largest economy has been so resilient in the face of stubbornly high inflation that economists and traders have had to repeatedly rip up their forecasts for slowing growth and interest-rate cuts."

Still, cracks are starting to form. First it was Americans falling behind on auto loans. Then credit-card delinquency rates reached the highest since at least 2012, with the share of debts 30, 60 and 90 days late all on the upswing.

And now, there are also signs that consumers are struggling to afford their BNPL debt, too. A recent survey conducted for Bloomberg News by Harris Poll found that 43% of those who owe money to BNPL services said they were behind on payments, while 28% said they were delinquent on other debt because of spending on the platforms.

For Quinlan, a major concern is that economic experts are being “lulled into complacency about where consumers are.”

“People need to be more awake to the risk of BNPL,” he said in an interview.

Well, those who care, are awake - we have written dozens of articles on the danger it poses; the problem is that those who are enabled by this latest mountain of debt - such as the Biden administration which can claim a victory for Bidenomics because the economy is so "strong", phantom debt be damned - are actively motivated to ignore it.

So why is this latest debt bubble called a "phantom"?

Well, BNPL is a black box largely because of a longstanding blame game among BNPL providers and the three major credit bureaus: TransUnion, Experian and Equifax. The BNPL companies don’t provide data on their installment loans that are split into four payments, which were used by online shoppers to spend an estimated $19.2 billion in the first quarter, according to Adobe Analytics, up 12.3% compared with the same period last year.

The BNPL giants say credit agencies can’t handle their information — and that releasing it could harm customers’ credit scores, which are key to securing mortgages and other loans. The big three bureaus say they're ready, while two of the major credit scoring firms, VantageScore Solutions and Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO), say they're equipped to test how the products will affect their figures. Meanwhile, regulation is looming over the industry, but this stalemate has left the status quo mostly in place.

In other words, not only do we not know just how big the BNPL problem is, it is actively masked by credit agencies which can't accurately calculate the FICO score of tens of millions of Americans, and as a result their credit capacity is artificially boosted with far more debt than they can handle... and that's why the US consumer has been so "strong" in recent years, defying all conventional credit metrics.

The good news is that despite the tacit pushback of the administration, there has been some signs of progress. Apple earlier this year became the first major BNPL provider to furnish transaction and payment data to Experian. As of now, it provides a snapshot of consumers’ overall debt load from Apple Pay Later transactions, but the information won’t be used for consumer credit scores. In separate statements to Bloomberg, Klarna, Affirm and Block said they want assurance that consumers’ credit scores and their data would be protected before reporting customer information. Representatives for TransUnion, Experian and Equifax said they’ve updated their structures and the data would be secure.

Still, the lack of transparency has researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which publishes a comprehensive quarterly report on the $17.5 trillion in US household debt, convinced they’re missing some of what’s happening in the economy.

“They’ve reached a certain scale that they could impact economists’ assumptions about their economic outlooks," said Simon Khalaf, Chief Executive Officer of Marqeta Inc., a firm that helps BNPL providers process their payments.

Meanwhile, the pernicious effects of BNPL credit are piling up: the Harris Poll survey conducted last month, provides some crucial clues about how Americans use BNPL. For one, splitting payments into smaller chunks encourages more spending, obviously.

More than half of respondents who use BNPL said it allowed them to purchase more than they could afford, while nearly a quarter agreed with the statement that their BNPL spending was “out of control.” Harris also found that 23% of users said they couldn’t afford the majority of what they bought without splitting payments, while more than a third turned to the services after maxing out credit cards.

The findings also show that the spending, which for more than a third of users has exceeded $1,000, isn’t entirely on big-ticket items. Almost half of those using BNPL say they've started, or have considered, using it to pay bills or buy essential items, including groceries.

Translation: Americans are no longer even charging everyday purchases they traditionally used cash and savings to pay for; now they are using installment plans to pay for bread!

It's not just the lower classes that are abusing BNPL credit: while whatever small pockets of consumer distress have emerged so far in the US, have been chalked up to a bifurcated economy where working class Americans struggle to make ends meet, the survey found that middle-class households are relying on BNPL, too. The shocking punchline: about 42% of those with household income of more than $100,000 report being behind or delinquent on BNPL payments!

“BNPL essentially lets people dig a deeper and deeper hole of credit, which will be harder and harder to climb out of,” said Ed deHaan, a professor of accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business, adding that it happens “more easily when there’s no transparency.”

Of course, installment debt is nothing new: the option to pay in installments using short-term loans has been around for a ong time, but it exploded in popularity during the pandemic, especially with younger, digitally savvy consumers who gravitated to the services as an alternative to credit cards. The pioneering BNPL companies, including Afterpay, Klarna and Affirm, launched with trendy retailers, partnered with social media influencers and became a common option on apps and online checkouts.

BNPL offers quick credit approvals and lets consumers pay in installments. The first is usually due right away, and the others are often collected once every two weeks for the popular “pay in four” loans. There’s typically no interest or fees, as long as payments are made on time. Like credit card companies, BNPL firms make money on fees from merchants — and some have steep penalties for missed payments.

While normally larger banks would avoid this kind of "new and much more dangerous subprime", this time is different: the rapid adoption of the products has enticed major financial institutions to offer the option to split payments, even as regulators warn them of the risks. That includes PayPal, U.S. Bancorp and Citizens Financial. Even big banks like Citigroup and JPMorgan have similar capabilities on their credit cards.

The industry has branded itself a financial equalizer. They argue that “soft-credit checks” — when a lender runs a consumer’s credit history without affecting their score — expand credit access to those underserved by traditional lenders, while zero-interest provides a better deal than many cards.

Affirm said its customers have an average outstanding balance of $641, while Afterpay and Klarna put the figure at $250 and $150, respectively. Unfortunately, there is no way to check these numbers. And while the average credit card balance was $6,501 in the third quarter of 2023, according to Experian data, the BNPL balances mean that most Americans can't even afford a weekly outing to their grocery store without putting it on an installment plan, a truly terrifying scenario.

Critics naturally argue that BNPL is particularly attractive to the financially vulnerable. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has flagged risks to consumers, including surprise late fees and “hidden interest” — or when BNPL purchases are made with credit cards charging high interest rates. The CFPB has also expressed concern about “loan stacking,” when individuals take out several BNPL loans at once with different providers, which is most of them.

Some BNPL services, including Afterpay and Klarna, require borrowers to agree to “mandatory autopayment,” meaning the companies can automatically charge the credit card or bank account on file when a payment is due. Those who link the latter are potentially vulnerable to overdraft fees.

Meanwhile, as rates remains sky high, even Wall Street's perpetually cheerful analysts are wondering where is all the consumption coming from?

Robust consumer spending and low unemployment rates have many economists convinced the US consumer remains strong, making Wall Street bullish on the economy. But lately, stubbornly persistent inflation has dialed back expectations for imminent interest-rate relief.

That’s set to ramp up pressure on households that are already stretched thin by higher prices for everything from gas and food to rent and apparel. As of the end of December, almost 3.5% of credit-card balances were at least 30 days past due, according to the Philadelphia Fed, the most since the data began in 2012. Nominal card balances also set a new high.

For those who are falling behind, BNPL offers what appears to be a no-brainer decision: space out payments... at least until this last credit buffer fills up and bankruptcy is the only possible outcome.

That was the thinking of Hayden Waschak, a 23-year-old in Pittsburgh. Even though he said it felt “dystopian” to use  BNPL to pay for food, he began using Klarna in February to spread out payments on a grocery delivery app. It helped his finances — at first. After he lost his job as a documents processing specialist at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in March, he relied more heavily on the service. And without any income, he became delinquent on payments and started racking up late charges. He eventually paid off the nearly $200 balance, but he said his credit score dropped.

“Unexpected life events caused me to lose income,” Waschak said. “I ended up paying more than if I had paid for it all at once.”

Meanwhile, the fact that BNPL balances do not count against your credit rating, means users get little upside when it comes to their credit — paying on time won’t help them build up their score. On the other hand, the downside is still there for falling behind: not only can they get charged late fees, but delinquent BNPL loans can be turned over to debt collectors.

The latter is what Fabrizio Lopez said happened to him. He used Affirm to split up a $500 online payment for used-car parts in 2019. The Long Island-based mechanic, who doesn’t have a traditional credit card, said that while he received the items a week later, he never got a bill. That is, until debt collection letters started pouring in from across the US.

Lopez said he primarily relied on cash before that purchase, so the unpaid loan stands out on his credit profile. Now 30, he worries that a the BNPL purchase has created “invisible barriers” to the financial system.

“They hook you with the idea of no interest rates,” he said. “I thought that I would be able to build my credit if I paid it back — I was so wrong.”

He is not the only one who is "so wrong": just as wrong are all those Panglossian economists at the Fed and Wall Street who believe that the US economy is growing at what the Atlanta Fed today laughably "calculated" was a 4.2% GDP, even as the DOE found that the most accurate indicator of overall economic strength, diesel demand, was the lowest since covid, an glaring paradox... yet glaring to all except those who refuse to see just how rotten the core of the US economy has become, and will be "absolutely shocked" when the next credit crisis destroys tens of millions of Americans drowning in what is now best known as "phantom debt."

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/missing-puzzle-piece-revealed-behind-inexplicable-strength-us-consumers-700-billion-phanton

Florida sues to block HHS bias rule

 Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and the Catholic Medical Association sued the Biden administration May 6 over a new rule under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that the administration says advances protections against discrimination in healthcare.

The rule, published by HHS on May 6, clarifies that Section 1557 bans discrimination in healthcare on the basis of sex, including discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes; sex characteristics, including intersex traits; pregnancy or related conditions; sexual orientation; and gender identity.

Ms. Moody and the Catholic Medical Association argue that the new rule goes beyond the limits of Section 1557 and would force Florida, which prohibits hormone treatment and surgery for minors, to violate state law and fund drugs and surgeries for "gender transition" for children.

The Biden administration is "trying to go around our child-protection law to force the state to pay for puberty blockers and gender-transition surgery for children," Ms. Moody said in a news release. "These rules trample states' power to protect their own citizens and we will not stand by as Biden tries, yet again, to use the force of the federal government to unlawfully stifle Florida's effort to protect children."

Ms. Moody filed the lawsuit on behalf of the plaintiffs, which include the state of Florida, Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Florida Department of Management Services and the Catholic Medical Association. The plaintiffs are asking the U.S. District Court of the Middle District of Florida in Tampa to block enforcement of the rule they contend is "arbitrary and capricious" and "threaten[s] the livelihood of doctors" who refuse to provide certain care. 

HHS declined Becker's request to comment about the pending litigation. However, the Biden administration argues the rule is crucial in maintaining access to care for LGBTQ+ patients, according to Politico.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/florida-sues-to-block-hhs-bias-rule.html

Hospital groups push UnitedHealth to provide breach notification for Change hack

 Hospital associations are urging UnitedHealthcare's CEO to provide a breach notification on behalf of the hospitals and health systems affected by the Feb. 21 attack on its subsidiary Change Healthcare. 

Hospital groups including the American Hospital Association, Children's Hospital Association, Federation of American Hospitals and more wrote a letter May 8 to UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty urging him to formalize "intentions regarding any breach notifications following the cyberattack on Change Healthcare."

In an April 22 news release from UnitedHealth Group, the company said it would provide a breach notification once it learned what kind of information was compromised. The company also said it would handle notifications and associated administrative tasks for any provider or customer that was affected by the breach.

But the hospital associations want UnitedHealth Group to notify HHS' Office for Civil Rights, state regulators, Congress, the media and other relevant stakeholders that it agrees to handle breach notifications for all the parties it covers, acting on their behalf.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/cybersecurity/hospital-groups-push-unitedhealth-to-provide-breach-notification-for-change-hack.html

Would leaders choose Steward hospitals for care?

 Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Steward Health Care CEO Ralph de la Torre, MD, continue to assure the public that the health system's hospitals will provide good care despite the company recently filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The Dallas-based company also has shared that its 31 hospitals are up for sale and revealed that the health system is $9 billion in debt. 

But Robert Kuttner, a coeditor of The American Prospect and professor at Brandeis University Heller School in Waltham, Mass., has questioned why Ms. Healey's administration is echoing the "happy talk" that Dr. de la Torre has continued to bolster throughout Steward's financial demise in a May 8 Boston Globe opinion piece.

"I want to be very clear in telling the public that these hospitals will remain open and folks should continue to keep their appointments and seek care as needed, including if you need to see an emergency room," Ms. Healey said during a May 6 news conference, according to the Globe .

While Steward's Massachusetts hospitals may remain open, Mr. Kuttner pointed to the severe erosion of their quality. 

In fact, Brockton, Mass.-based Good Samaritan Medical Center, Boston-based St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, and Boston-based Carney Hospital all received three star ratings out of five from Medicare.gov. Morton Hospital in Taunton, Mass., and Holy Family Hospital in Methuen, Mass., received two stars. All are Steward-operated facilities.

Regardless of quality, Ms. Healey has pushed to keep the hospitals open and operating until they can be sold to another operator to keep a state bailout from happening, Mr. Kuttner said. 

However, Ms. Healey and Dr. de la Torre do have one thing in common, a goal to keep patients from abandoning Steward hospitals in Massachusetts, which could make finding a buyer for the hospitals more difficult. 

While reducing Steward's debt will be helpful for the health system's balance sheet, Mr. Kuttner fears it won't be enough money to make sure the hospitals are providing sufficient care to patients. 

"Despite the governor’s reassurance that the 'hospitals will remain open and folks should continue to keep their appointments,' I would not seek care there," Mr. Kuttner said. "I'm not sure that the governor would either."

Read the full op-ed here.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/op-ed-would-leaders-choose-steward-hospitals-for-care.html

"Is Consumer Travel Spending Easing?" - BofA Identifies New Trend As Travel Companies Miss Earnings

 One theme we've spotted this earnings season has been an increasing number of companies warning about low-income consumers. 

From McDonald's to Starbucks to Tyson Foods, executives on earnings calls have warned about mounting headwinds hitting the working poor. 

Last Tuesday, Starbucks CEO Laxman Narasimhan told investors on a call, "Our performance this quarter was disappointing and did not meet our expectations," adding that significant headwinds originate from a "cautious consumer." 

A similar message was shared by McDonald's last week when execs reported lower-than-expected quarterly sales growth. 

On Monday, Melanie Boulden, who oversees Tyson's Prepared Foods business, warned, "The consumer is under pressure, especially the lower-income households." 

Then, on Wednesday, credit card data from the Federal Reserve showed households finally hit a brick wall. Credit card debt growth in March plunged to the smallest monthly increase since the Covid crash. 

This morning, Bank of America's trading desk also spotted some weakness in consumer-sensitive stocks, this time in the travel industry. 

"Theme Alert? Consumer Travel Spending easing?" BofA's analysts asked. 

They pointed out a list of disappointing earnings across the travel industry: 

  • $EXPE miss/guide

  • $TRIP miss

  • $CMCSA parks commentary

  • $DIS parks' moderation' or normalization

  • $UBER slight bookings miss

Tripadvisor experienced its worst intraday decline ever, with its stock plunging by as much as 38%. This was due to the online travel firm's announcement that it had called off a deal to sell the company.

Did the lack of 'deal premium' suddenly expose investors to the the reality that Gen-Z and millennials can no longer afford their stimmy-funded "experiences" as the economy slows.

Taking a deeper dive into markets, the Dow Jones US Travel & Leisure Index peaked in late March and fell 7.5%. The index is up against heavy resistance. 

Interestingly, the Transportation Security Administration's airport checkpoint data still shows robust travel demand. 

Bank of America's trading desk may be onto something here, a trend that other companies are also starting to notice: low-income consumers are cracking in the era of failed Bidenomics

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/consumer-travel-spending-easing-bofa-identifies-new-trend-travel-companies-miss-earnings

Higher Education and ‘Jewish Science’

 “It was eerie.  I saw myself in that machine.  I never thought my work would come to this.”

The frail old man, amazed when he saw an image of his face while undergoing an MRI in 1987, was the world-renowned physicist and devout Jew Isidor Isaac Rabi

Whether the technicians who used the MRI machine knew they were diagnosing its famous inventor is unknown.  But it was Rabi whose earlier research on nuclear magnetic resonance in 1938 made the magical machine possible.

Few in the hospital would have known their elderly patient as the winner of the Nobel Prize in 1944.  Nor would they have known of Rabi’s stellar career at Columbia University, where he was head of the physics department.  Under his direction, the department became one of the most prestigious in the world, drawing in scientists and students from around the globe.

Shortly after Rabi’s installation at Columbia in 1929, anti-Semitic campaigns against professors in Europe began.  Some of America’s colleges and universities began to raise funds to help refugee Jewish scholars.  As Laurel Leff points out,  “at some universities, faculty members started funds to pay the salaries of displaced scholars.  Columbia University was one of the most active.  In 1933, 125 Columbia faculty members contributed a total of ... almost $80,000 in contemporary dollars, for temporary fellowships.”  (Italics mine.)

Leff was writing about the same institution of higher learning where recently pro-Hamas demonstrators displayed hatred of Israel and the Jews — the university where those same protesters managed to bar a pro-Israel Jewish professor Shai Davidai from the campus.  While the protesters have since been forcibly removed from occupying a building on the campus, the underlying issue of antisemitism remains glaringly problematic.

Perhaps Columbia and other academic institutions should recall the historical context in which even the fundamental science of physics was assaulted by antisemitic (and anti-Christian) forces.

Shortly after Rabi began his long tenure at Columbia in 1929, a huge controversy about the nature of physics erupted.  Adolf Hitler’s regime insisted on the sole legitimacy of what it termed “Aryan science,” a supposedly superior and uniquely German science, opposed to what was termed “Jewish science.”

The regime demanded that physicists disassociate themselves from “Jewish physics.”  Nazi ideology infiltrated and corrupted the Jewish and Christian idea of science as founded on universal verities.

As Scientific American noted in 2015, quoting an excerpt from Philip Ball’s  Serving the Reich: The Struggle for the Soul of Physics under Hitler:

Anti-Semitism did not just deprive German physics of some of its most valuable researchers. It also threatened to prescribe what kind of physics one could and could not do…like a virus, it worked its way into the very fabric of intellectual life.

The reason for the rejection of “Jewish science” went far deeper than animus against Jewish scientists and cut to a foundational principle of science itself.  Those committed to “Aryan science” believed that racial superiority determined true science.  Ball describes the regime’s objections to “Jewish science”:

The fundamental problem lay with a foreign and degenerate approach to science itself. The popular notion that science has a universal nature and spirit, they said, is quite wrong. ... Jews did science differently from true Germans. ... The spirit of the German enables him to observe things outside himself exactly as they are. ... Thus, it is understandable that natural science is overwhelmingly a creation of the Nordic–Germanic blood compo­nent of the Aryan peoples.

During the 1930s, mere association with “Jewish science” was enough to take many German scientists down.  One consequence was that Werner Heisenberg was forced to fight identification as a “White Jew” because of his refusal to repudiate Albert Einstein’s work.  Only a threat to resign and emigrate to America, where Columbia University had offered a position, extricated him from his dilemma.

In other words, the essential idea that science was based on universal principles that held true regardless of one’s race or nationality was jettisoned in favor of science as defined by a particular subset of humanity.  One race was seen as having a higher status, elevating its members’ ideas about science above Jews like Albert Einstein.  The result was that fascist ideology distorted and nearly destroyed scientific research in Germany.

What is essentially fascist ideology has intruded in today’s academic circles, making one’s race, sex, or nationality the measure of authentic research, including scientific research.  As among other academic disciplines, there now is only legitimacy of individual perspective, not universal truths to be theorized, tested, and proven and declared fallible if rigorous criteria do not ratify theory.  For those committed to the increasingly disregarded universal scientific method, there is feminist, patriarchal, black, white, queer, Western, Eastern, and Jewish science.  For the scientist committed to the scientific method, there is just science — science that anyone can study, no matter what the race or nationality.

The rise of fascist racial ideology and its consequent ruination of academia were deplored by theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who saw the subversion and even destruction of foundational beliefs of Judaism and Christianity. 

In 1930, Bonhoeffer visited Union Seminary, which was founded by ministers of the Presbyterian Church USA, and which was and supposedly is still a spiritual guide for Columbia University.  He was shocked to find the seminary lacking rigorous intellectual and spiritual integrity.  

But what he now would find at Union would have been unimaginable to him even during the 1930s.  Today, he would find the academic catalogue offering a course on “Galatians: Queering Gender and Other Binaries.”  St. Paul is presented as an advocate of a “a new trans-binary community.”  As for the Hebrew Bible?  It is described as a testament to “diversity of perspectives,” meaning Scripture is whatever one makes of it.

In brief, identity politics as defined by racial, victim, and gender politics is now shaping Union’s perception of theology in the same way “Aryan science” shaped science and theology during the Third Reich.  As Victoria Barnett quotes in her essay on Bonhoeffer’s work After Ten Years:

The huge masquerade of evil has thrown all ethical concepts into confusion. That evil should appear in the form of light, good deeds, historical necessity, social justice is absolutely bewildering for one coming from the world of ethical concepts that we have received. For the Christian who lives by the Bible, it is the very confirmation of the abysmal wickedness of evil.

Who stands firm? Only the one ... is called to obedient and responsible action. Such a person is the responsible one, whose life is to be nothing but a response to God’s question and call. Where are these responsible ones?

Isador Isacc Rabi, recipient of a special chair named after him at Columbia University and a friend of Werner Heisenberg and Robert Oppenheimer, was one of the “responsible ones.”  He said,

Physics filled me with awe, put me in touch with a sense of original causes. Physics brought me closer to God.  That feeling stayed with me throughout my years in science.  Whenever one of my students came to me with a scientific project, I asked only one question, “Will it bring you nearer to God?”

The protesters at Columbia, though temporarily subdued, essentially support terrorism.  They probably do not know the words written under Columbia’s logo: “In lumine tuo videbimus lumen.”  The phrase is taken from Psalm 36: “For with Thee is the fountain of life: in Thy light shall we see light.”

For believing Jews and Christians, God is the universal source of light and wisdom.  Columbia, Yale, Princeton, and other institutions gradually have been divesting themselves of the light of their Jewish and Christian heritage for many decades.  Now they are seeing the darkness resulting from the extinguishing of the light.

Renouncing, and yes, even arresting promoters of terrorism may be a sign of return to principles on which so many of America’s top universities and colleges were founded.

If there is not a return, the current capitulation to fascist ideology within and outside Columbia and other leading institutions augurs the collapse of the entire academic enterprise, a collapse that threatens even Rabi’s beloved physics.  As J. Robert Oppenheimer pointed out in his speech given in 1958 at Princeton Theological Seminary, “the very existence of science is threatened, and its value is threatened.”

Columbia University might conduct a litmus test indicating whether its faculty and administration are “responsible ones.”

The university founded the I.I. Rabi Science Scholars Program.  According to the institution’s website, “about ten incoming first year students who demonstrate exceptional promise in the sciences are chosen to be Rabi Scholars.”

Columbia must answer the critical questions: are Jewish students of science allowed to apply?  If accepted, will they need police to protect them?

The university’s answer will determine the fate of not only the students, but also much more.

Fay Voshell holds an M.Div. from Princeton Theological Seminary, which awarded her the prize for excellence in systematic theology.  Her thoughts have appeared in many online magazines, including American Thinker.  

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/05/higher_education_and_jewish_science.html

Psychotropics for toddlers?

A patient healed is a customer lost.

Little Rebecca Riley was just two years old when a Boston psychiatrist diagnosed her with bipolar disorder and ADHD, prescribing her with a host of psychotropic drugs; by age four, she was dead from overmedication. Now, while Rebecca’s parents went to prison, Dr. Kayoko Kifuji never faced any serious consequences for her role in Rebecca’s death (and subsequent negligence or oversight), and as far as I can tell, is still “practicing” medicine.

This morning, a reader sent us a report from Frontline News which detailed Rebecca’s story and the subsequent 2010 criminal trials—but the piece also highlighted an aspect of the pharmaceutical-industrial-complex (PIC) that all too often escapes our attention: children dosed with psychotropic drugs.

From that Frontline item:

According to the CDC, in 2022, 9.3 percent of children aged between 5 and 17 were taking drugs for their ‘mental health.’ This translates to around five million children. As many anti-Pharma activists have pointed out, children are a very sought-after demographic for drugging, as they usually have little to no say as to whether to take the drugs or not, even when adverse events are disturbing, painful, and/or outright harmful. Furthermore, a childhood on drugs very often predicts adult life on more drugs—more of the same, plus others.

That’s a 2022 stat—I wonder where some of those kids are now? Oh I don’t know, probably LARPing around Ivy League campuses and vandalizing property as they don terrorist scarves and wave signs calling for the invocation of the Third Reich’s “final solution” strategy:


 

Psychotropics are a dangerous class of drugs, for children and adults alike—but that doesn’t matter to the people peddling them, because it means lots of cash. Here’s a new development, also from Frontline:

Who is looking out for these children? Not the FDA it seems. Just a few months ago, the FDA decided to expand its approval of an SSRI-class drug, Lexapro, to ‘treat anxiety’ in children as young as seven years old.


The authors of the clinical trial upon which the approval was based wrote that Lexapro ‘reduced anxiety symptoms and was well tolerated,’ adding that, ‘the benefits of the product outweigh the risks.’

Did children have anxiety before the Standard American Diet—complete with poisonous synthetic dyes, toxic preservatives, GMOs, pesticides, and repurposed engine lubricant—became the norm? No.

Did children have anxiety before their parents raised them as “genderless” beings? No.

Did children have anxiety when raised in a nuclear family household? No.

Did children have anxiety before they were pumped full of synthetic cross-sex hormones?

Did children have anxiety when the culture reflected objectively good and moral principles? No.

Did children get diagnosed with severe personality disorders while in toddlerhood before the modern era of Rockefeller-based medicine? No.

If you start to research links between psychotropics and homicidal/suicidal outbursts, you’ll be bombarded with “scientific” articles and mainstream reports asserting the alleged link to be a mere “myth” and a “dubious claim” unbacked by science. But expecting the industry raking in tens of billions of dollars from these drugs to conduct a fair investigation into whether or not their product is causing people to lose their minds is like believing the CIA when it says it found no link between itself and the crack cocaine trade:

 

 

Here’s this, from a 2021 article on the numbers and profit forecast:

Visiongain’s lead analyst says: ‘The Global mental disorder drugs market was valued at US$ US$36.77 bn in 2020 and is projected to reach at a market value of US$58.91 billion by 2031. Rising prevalence of mental disorders; mounting investment in drug R&D by pharmaceutical & biopharmaceutical companies; growing mental health care awareness; new product launches and rising acceptance of mental disorder drugs worldwide are some of the major factors that propel the global mental disorder drugs market growth’.

We know correlation doesn’t imply causation, but it’s certainly relevant when some of the most high-profile murders (including mass shootings) are committed by kids on psychotropic drugs. Here is a fairly extensive list of examples (with drug names included), but I’ll only mention a few: Eric Harris, one of the Columbine shooters; Jeff Weise, Red Lake High School shooter; Kip Kinkel; Michael Carneal, Kentucky highschool shooter; and Pekka-Eric Auvinen, also known as The YouTube Killer.