Search This Blog

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Google Slammed Over "Soul Crushing" AI Olympics Ad

 by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Google has been blasted for a commercial touting its Gemini AI tool, with viewers describing the ad as completely “soul crushing.”

The minute-long video was aired over coverage of the Olympics and features a young girl who is a big fan of American Olympic hurdler Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone

The girl’s father is seen in the commercial saying “She might even be the world’s number one Sydney fan.”

Then comes the kicker.

The ad shows the girl turning to Google’s Gemini AI to help understand running and hurdling techniques.

OK, that’s not so inherently bad, but the father might have done his own research and at least put on a show of interacting with his daughter.

But then it gets worse.

The father notes that his daughter “wants to show Sydney some love, and I’m pretty good with words, but this has to be just right,” before again turning to the AI, this time to write a letter to the Olympian for the girl.

The backlash was immediate, even from leftists.

Professor Shelly Palmer of Syracuse University’s Newhouse School of Public Communications noted “This is exactly what we do not want anyone to do with AI. Ever.”

The globalist technocrat mindset is that children shouldn’t have to think for themselves and the human authenticity factor of a child’s imagination wasn’t even a consideration.

The ad reminded some of Apple’s iPad app from earlier this year, which saw musical instruments, art materials, cameras and basically anything creative being literally crushed in a giant mechanical press and replaced with the tablet.

They’e seemingly proud to be destroying human imagination, creativity and talent.

It was so bad, Apple had to apologise and scrap plans to broadcast it.

Google’s Gemini also has a raft of other problems going on with it.

*  *  *

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/google-slammed-over-soul-crushing-ai-olympics-ad

Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy

 JOHN WHYTE: Welcome, everyone. I'm Dr. John Whyte. I'm the Chief Medical Officer at WebMD. 

Today, I want to spend some time with you talking about epilepsy, particularly sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Joining me to help provide insight are two experts. Dr. Stephan Schuele; he is chief of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology in the Department of Neurology at Northwestern Medicine. And Tom Stanton; he's the president of the Danny Did Foundation. Gentlemen, thanks for joining me today. 

STEPHAN SCHUELE: Thanks for having us. 

JOHN WHYTE: Stephan, I want to start off with-- can you provide an overview for the audience of what we mean by sudden unexpected death in epilepsy? We've heard about sudden death in heart disease, but what does it mean when we're talking about epilepsy? And do we know the risk factors? 

STEPHAN SCHUELE: Very good question. Yeah, you know, when we think about seizures and epilepsy, we kind of-- everybody can imagine that you can have a trauma, or you could drown from a seizure. You can be involved in an accident. But I think what a lot of people are not aware of is the fact that you can actually die from a seizure itself. You know, the seizure can be so strong that you don't wake up afterwards. 

That is, fortunately, extremely rare and happens, you know, in 1 in 1,000 patients a year. So if I see 1,000 patients, it happened in one patient. But obviously, it happens in my practice because I see patients every day with epilepsy. It is even more common in patients who have really bad epilepsy. So that's one of the risk factors. So patients that are not controlled on their medications, the risk goes up. 

To keep it in perspective-- most patients with epilepsy are otherwise healthy. You know, it affects you in your best years of life often. 

JOHN WHYTE: That's why advocacy is so important-- helping explain to folks with epilepsy and their caregivers, what sudden unexpected death may mean, as well as the general public. As you alluded to, there's some misconceptions. So, Tom, tell us a little bit about the mission and what's your objectives. 

TOM STANTON: Sure, thanks, John. You know, when we started, unfortunately, it was after a tragedy that our family experienced. My nephew, Danny, had epilepsy, was diagnosed around the age of 2. And like Stephan alluded to, he was otherwise healthy, which is oftentimes the case for people with epilepsy. 

He had about four seizures over the next 2 and 1/2 years that his parents witnessed. And they were all during sleep, which is something that, you know, some people aren't even aware of that seizures can happen during sleep. And it's fairly common. Danny was 4 and 1/2 and he went to a routine checkup with his neurologist. They adjusted his medication based on weight gain. And it was 4 days later that his mom found him unresponsive. He had been lost, and they didn't know why. 

It wasn't until the death certificate was administered that they saw this term SUDEP. And it was just this kind of shocking experience. Not only did they lose their son, who they had been with the day prior, but they lost it to a risk that they had never been counseled about, they had never heard of. 

And so his parents decided they didn't want that to happen to other families and established that Danny Did Foundation to help other families avoid that scenario. 

JOHN WHYTE: Thank you, Tom, for sharing that story and to his parents as well, which really helps us to better advocate. Tom, where are we kind of in this landscape of educating folks, raising awareness? Because in some ways, we want to remind people that you can have a normal life, right? You might have to have some adjustments. But then we want to say, but wait, you have to be alert to this issue of sudden unexpected death. How do you bridge that and provide good information for folks? 

TOM STANTON: I think for us, it involves working both sides of the equation. So we talk with patients and caregivers about the fact that they're being empowered with this information. It's given from a place of power, empowerment and not fear. And sometimes patients or caregivers have to instigate the discussion so that the doctor feels that they have permission to move ahead with the conversation. 

On the flip side, we really encourage physicians to openly discuss SUDEP for a variety of reasons. One, both the AAN and the AES, they both recommend disclosure. There was a 2017 SUDEP guideline in which they recommend disclosure for all people with epilepsy. Another factor is that patients and caregivers really desire to be informed. 

JOHN WHYTE: Stephan, what's your strategy at Northwestern? How do you approach these discussions? Or in some ways, what do you want viewers and listeners to hear in terms of the questions that they may think about asking? 

STEPHAN SCHUELE: I look at it in the broad context of education. You know, when you have your patient coming with the first seizure, they have-- many of them have questions which fill a full hour. And I think that that is correct, you know? If I would have my first seizure, I would have an hour of questions for you. So I think if you create a culture of education and being open for questions of your patients, I think that's probably the most important aspect to actually lead into discussing SUDEP as well. 

And then, obviously, education for ourselves. My nurses know about SUDEP. All my residents and fellows know about SUDEP. And we have several lectures a year, which focus on the topic of SUDEP. 

JOHN WHYTE: Tom, Danny Did has a lot of resources for patients, for parents, for caregivers. Tell us about some of these resources and how folks can access them. 

TOM STANTON: I think one of the most important resources is just to help patients and caregivers know the questions to ask their doctor to help them tailor their individual risk level. I think that's really important in terms of coming up with a modified treatment plan is to know where do they fall on this risk spectrum. And I think knowing what those risk factors are. So Stephan mentioned a few of them, both of which impacted my nephew. 

Even though he didn't have a high volume of seizures, he had convulsive seizures. They happened during sleep. So I think just knowing the questions to ask, knowing what the risk factors are, feeling like you have permission to instigate the conversation. And those are all things that people can learn more about on our website, which is dannydid.org. 

In that worst case scenario, John, where someone has lost someone to SUDEP, that's another way that we can support, not the way that we want to, but offering just bereavement support to let them know that they're not alone in suffering this kind of horrible loss. And that there's a community around this thing called SUDEP is another way that we're there for families. 

JOHN WHYTE: Well, I wanted to ask about this concept of community, because you're really building a sense of community. Tell us about that. 

TOM STANTON: Yeah, I think there's really no disease state that has achieved progress without that drive and urgency that comes from parent advocacy. And that's really what we were founded on, is just two parents that wanted to carry their son forward. Epilepsy can be a really isolating disease. There's a lot of stigma around it. 

So bringing people together in environments that allow them to not only gain information and resources, but really to form relationships and social bonds, too, is something that's important to us. We also have an event that we co-host called Partners Against Mortality in Epilepsy, or PAME. And it's really focused on moving forward solutions around what causes SUDEP? How can it be prevented. What kind of research do we still need to learn more about it? And that meeting is really the only place that we know of where people have lost a loved one to SUDEP can come and talk with other families and gain some resources and support. 

JOHN WHYTE: Stephan, in your mind, what are the priorities or the initiatives that we need over the next year or 2 in order to reduce the incidence of SUDEP? 

STEPHAN SCHUELE: For many patients with epilepsy, understanding what is the best treatment and how vital is their treatment really starts in some way with understanding what the worst thing is which can happen to them. You know, my patients don't have pain every morning to take their medication. They take their medication so it gets them through the day safely. 

And I think that knowing about what they are preventing with taking their medication I think is an important aspect of SUDEP. You know, I think number two is we are-- Northwestern is a big epilepsy center. We offer epilepsy surgery for patients. And we recently realized that actually the patients who are successful undergoing surgery have reduced risk of dying from SUDEP than patients who are not candidates or choose not to go down that route. So I think that's another aspect that there are treatments which are available, which I think we want to make sure patients understand that they're there. 

I think there's a big push in the epilepsy community for better seizure detection and recognition of seizures. So bed alarms, wrist alarms, things which can make patients feel safer and also family members be quicker in responding I think is an important aspect to it. And then, lastly, is, obviously, we want to understand the actual mechanism of SUDEP, which is more research driven. What makes someone to stop breathing or the medication which can prevent that from happening from the flattening of the EEG and the lack of respiratory drive to catch a breath and come out of it, you know, which is all what it needs to get out of there. I think we are working hard on understanding those mechanisms and maybe have medications eventually or stimulators or other devices which can resuscitate patients successfully. 

JOHN WHYTE: Well, certainly there is more work to be done, more research, more awareness. I want to thank you both for really leading the charge in how we raise awareness of SUDEP and how we can better manage it. So thank you both. 

STEPHAN SCHUELE: Well, thanks for having us. 

https://www.medscape.com/s/viewarticle/understanding-sudden-unexpected-death-epilepsy-2024a1000dym

'Paxlovid, Vitamin Supplements Show Promise With Long COVID'

 Paxlovid, an antiviral approved last year to treat acute infections of COVID-19, is showing great potential as a new treatment for long COVID and may be the most promising experimental therapy now being studied for treating the condition.

New research offers strong evidence that Paxlovid provides significant benefits for COVID-19 patients who are at high risk for severe or prolonged disease, particularly older adults and those who are immunocompromised, said Lisa Sanders, MD, medical director of Yale's Long COVID Multidisciplinary Care Center, New Haven, Connecticut. 

"We all know that long COVID is a disease smorgasbord of illnesses that have been somehow triggered by COVID. So, the question is, are there some types of these disorders that can respond to Paxlovid?" Sanders said. 

Some patients have also benefitted from supplements such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), as well as vitamins B, C, D and alpha lipoic acid, in which the risks are low and there are potential benefits, Sanders said.

As researchers continue to study new treatments for long COVID, for which there are no standard approved therapies, Sanders suggested doctors might turn to Paxlovid and other promising therapeutics that have shown benefits in preliminary study findings.

A study published last year by JAMA Internal Medicine reviewed the charts of nearly 300,000 veterans with severe acute COVID infections. The study found that Paxlovid treatment reduced the likelihood of developing long COVID. But a more recent study at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California — the STOP-PASC trial— did not find Paxlovid improved symptoms when given to 155 patients who had already recovered from acute infection. Participants with long COVID symptoms — and who had on average recovered from acute infection around 16 months earlier — were given a 15-day course of Paxlovid. Common symptoms like fog, fatigue, and cardiovascular or gastrointestinal symptoms did not improve.

However, long COVID likely has multiple drivers. Viral persistence may still be at play for a subset of patients. This means that despite the fact that patients recover from acute infection, hidden reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 are still present in the body, possibly bringing on long COVID symptoms. Which means Paxlovid may help some long COVID patients but not others, Sanders explained. That's why research needs to continue to identify the best cases for Paxlovid's use and to identify other treatments for those who do not benefit from Paxlovid.

The PAX LC trial at Yale suggests there may not be a one-size-fits-all treatment for the condition, but a range of factors that may determine the best therapy for individual patients. Led by Yale School of Medicine's Harlan Krumholz, MD, and Akiko Iwasaki, PhD, the study tested the effects of Paxlovid overall and was designed to determine who is most likely to benefit from antiviral treatment and gain further understanding of the immune response in Iong COVID. Results should be reported soon. 

"This acknowledges one line of thinking that long COVID is caused by viral persistence," Sanders said. "Do these people have hidden reservoirs of the virus? The question is, are there people who seem to respond (to Paxlovid)? And if so, what characterizes these people?"

Low-Risk, High-Reward Supplements

Some of Sanders' colleagues at Yale are focusing on long COVID's neurological symptoms and neuropathogenesis. There's evidence showing these symptoms — notably brain fog — can be treated with supplements. 

In 2022, a Yale study by Arman Fesharaki-Zadeh, MD, PhD, found promise in treating brain fog through a combination supplement of NAC and guanfacine — the latter developed by Yale neuroscientist, Amy Arnsten, PhD. 

The two published their study in Neuroimmunology Reports in November 2023. NAC is available over the counter and patients can get a prescription for guanfacine off-label from their physician. Guanfacine is approved to treat high blood pressure by decreasing heart rate and relaxing blood vessels. But it's also been shown to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other cognitive issues. 

Though NAC can treat respiratory problems, it's also commonly used to treat postconcussion symptoms. Fesharaki-Zadeh found that it helps treat brain fog, increases energy, and improves memory. When paired with guanfacine, substantial benefits were reported, such as better multitasking abilities and markedly improved organizational skills. 

Sanders is now using NAC and guanfacine for patients in her clinic. 

'Mitochondrial Enhancement' Vitamins

Sanders has also used a combination of alpha lipoic acid and vitamin C, and a combo of B vitamins that make up what's called a "mitochondrial enhancement regimen."

To treat a very common symptom like fatigue, Sanders prefers supplement combinations over other drugs like Modafinil or Adderall. 

Modafinil is a central nervous system stimulant used to reduce extreme sleepiness due to narcolepsy or other sleep disorders. Adderall is an amphetamine also used to treat narcolepsy as well as ADHD. Both work on your sleep and alertness, but long COVID affects the whole body, causing a physical fatigue similar to postexertional malaise (PEM) that isn't remedied by those kinds of drugs, as studies suggest what's involved in PEM is mitochondria, Sanders said. 

PEM is a worsening of symptoms that occurs after minimal physical or mental exertion. These are activities that should be well tolerated, but PEM causes extreme fatigue and flu-like symptoms. It's become a hallmark symptom of long COVID after having already been a key diagnostic factor in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

As Sanders noted in her long COVID blog, which tracks the latest research and treatment options for doctors who treat long COVID patients, previous studies have shown low vitamin D levels may not only increase the risk for severe COVID-19 but delay recovery from long COVID. Those without long COVID had higher levels of vitamin D compared with long COVID patients. Vitamin D is known to boost the immune system.

Sanders found that those with vitamin D deficiencies are most likely to benefit from this approach. For people who don't have sufficient sun exposure, which prompts the production of vitamin D, she says supplementation with 1000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily is enough for most adults.

Research is also currently being underway on the use of the diabetes drug metformin in people with acute COVID infections to determine if it may reduce the likelihood of developing long COVID. In a recent long COVID clinical trial, early outpatient COVID-19 treatment with metformin decreased the subsequent risk for long COVID by 41.3% during 10-month follow-up. 

Other New Treatments Under Study

Sanders believes the foundation for many of long COVID's symptoms could be neurological. 

"I think that long Covid is probably a neurologic disorder," Sanders said. 

Lindsey McAlpine, MD, director of the Yale Medicine NeuroCovid Clinic, is focusing on neuropsychiatric long COVID and the causes of neurologic postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (neuro-PASC). Symptoms of neuro-PASC include cognitive impairment, headaches, and dizziness.

"Lindsey is trying to see which parts of the brain are involved and see if there are phenotypes of brain abnormalities that match up with clinical abnormalities," Sanders said.

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke recently awarded her a 5-year K23 grant to support her ongoing study, "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Post-COVID-19 Cerebral Microvascular Dysfunction."

Utilizing advanced MRI techniques to identify microvascular dysfunction biomarkers in the brain, McAlpine hopes to unearth and better understand the pathophysiology behind neurological issues post covid.

Many of McAlpine's patients with cognitive symptoms have responded well to NAC and guanfacine. 

Still, the hope is that her brain-imaging studies will bear fruit that leads to a better understanding of long COVID and new treatment methods.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/paxlovid-vitamin-supplements-show-promise-long-covid-2024a1000du8

'Too Much Coffee Linked to Accelerated Cognitive Decline'

 Drinking more than three cups of coffee a day is linked to more rapid cognitive decline over time, results from a large study suggest.

Investigators examined the impact of different amounts of coffee and tea on fluid intelligence — a measure of cognitive functions including abstract reasoning, pattern recognition, and logical thinking.

"It's the old adage that too much of anything isn't good. It's all about balance, so moderate coffee consumption is okay but too much is probably not recommended," study investigator Kelsey R. Sewell, PhD, Advent Health Research Institute, Orlando, told Medscape Medical News

The findings of the study were presented on July 30 at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) 2024

Widely Consumed Beverage

Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world. The beans contain a range of bioactive compounds, including caffeine, chlorogenic acid, and small amounts of vitamins and minerals.

Consistent evidence from observational and epidemiologic studies indicates that intake of both coffee and tea has beneficial effects on strokeheart failure, cancers, diabetes, and Parkinson's disease

Several studies also suggest that coffee may reduce the risk for Alzheimer's disease, said Sewell. However, there are limited longitudinal data on associations between coffee and tea intake and cognitive decline, particularly in distinct cognitive domains.

Sewell's group previously published a study of cognitively unimpaired older adults that found greater coffee consumption was associated with slower cognitive decline and slower accumulation of brain beta-amyloid.

Their current study extends some of the prior findings and investigates the relationship between both coffee and tea intake and cognitive decline over time in a larger sample of older adults.

This new study included 8451 mostly female (60%) and White (97%) cognitively unimpaired adults older than 60 (mean age, 67.8 years) in the UK Biobank, a large-scale research resource containing in-depth, de-identified genetic and health information from half a million UK participants. Study subjects had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26, and about 26% were apolipoprotein epsilon 4 (APOE e4) gene carriers.

Researchers divided coffee and tea consumption into tertiles: high, moderate, and no consumption.

For daily coffee consumption, 18% reported drinking four or more cups (high consumption); 58% reported drinking one to three cups (moderate consumption); and 25% reported that they never drink coffee. For daily tea consumption, 47% reported drinking four or more cups (high consumption); 38% reported drinking one to three cups (moderate consumption); and 15% reported that they never drink tea.

The study assessed cognitive function at baseline and at least two additional patient visits. 

Researchers used linear mixed models to assess the relationships between coffee and tea intake and cognitive outcomes. The models adjusted for age, sex, Townsend deprivation index (reflecting socioeconomic status), ethnicity, APOE e4 status, and BMI.

Steeper Decline 

Compared with high coffee consumption (four or more cups daily), people who never consumed coffee (beta = 0.06; SE = 0.02; P = .005) and those with moderate consumption (beta = 0.07; SE = 0.02; = < .001) had slower decline in fluid intelligence after an average of 8.83 years of follow-up.

"We can see that those with high coffee consumption showed the steepest decline in fluid intelligence across the follow up, compared to those with moderate coffee consumption and those never consuming coffee," said Sewell, referring to illustrative graphs.

At the same time, "our data suggest that across this time period, moderate coffee consumption can serve as some kind of protective factor against cognitive decline," she added.

For tea, there was a somewhat different pattern. People who never drank tea had a greater decline in fluid intelligence compared with those who had moderate consumption (beta = 0.06; SE = 0.02; P = .0090) or high consumption (beta = 0.06; SE = 0.02; P = .003).

Because this is an observational study, "we still need randomized controlled trials to better understand the neuroprotective mechanism of coffee and tea compounds," said Sewell.

Responding later to a query from a meeting delegate about how moderate coffee drinking could be protective, Sewell said there are probably "different levels of mechanisms," including at the molecular level (possibly involving amyloid toxicity) and the behavioral level (possibly involving sleep patterns).

Sewell said that she hopes this line of investigation will lead to new avenues of research in preventive strategies for Alzheimer's disease. 

"We hope that coffee and tea intake could contribute to the development of a safe and inexpensive strategy for delaying the onset and reducing the incidence for Alzheimer's disease."

A limitation of the study is possible recall bias, because coffee and tea consumption were self-reported. However, this may not be much of an issue because coffee and tea consumption "is usually quite a habitual behavior," said Sewell.

The study also had no data on midlife coffee or tea consumption and did not compare the effect of different preparation methods or types of coffee and tea — for example, green tea vs black tea. 

When asked if the study controlled for smoking, Sewell said it didn't but added that it would be interesting to explore its impact on cognition.

Sewell reports no relevant conflicts of interest.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/too-much-coffee-linked-accelerated-cognitive-decline-2024a1000e6q

'Time for Nvidia to replace Intel in the Dow'

 Intel is missing out on one of the biggest booms in semiconductors, while Nvidia embodies where the chip sector stands

After Intel Corp.'s disastrous news on Thursday, it is time for the once great semiconductor company to be replaced in the Dow Jones Industrial Average by the real leader in the sector, Nvidia Corp.

Intel (INTC), once the world's largest chip maker, fell a little further on Thursday, since it first lost its crown a few years ago. Intel shares tumbled almost 20% on the news that it needs to cut $10 billion in costs and is cutting 15% of its workforce and its quarterly dividend, starting in the fourth quarter. Chief Executive Pat Gelsinger even admitted that Intel has yet to "fully benefit from powerful trends like AI."

Earlier this year, when Amazon.com (AMZN) replaced Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. (WBA) in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the S&P Dow Jones Indices said at the time that the change was a reflection "on the evolving nature of the American economy."

In the current economic environment, Intel is missing out of the AI boom, especially in the data center, where Nvidia's (NVDA) graphics processor units (GPUs) are becoming an essential purchase to turn data centers into AI factories, as CEO Jensen Huang likes to describe them. Customers appear to be spending more on GPUs than on the core central processing units (CPUs) that Intel makes.

"I think the issue is that companies and cloud vendors are shifting capex expenditures to buy more GPUs and less CPUs," said Kevin Krewell, principal analyst at Tirias Research, in an email.

Intel's latest version of its graphics accelerator chip, Gaudi 3, is expected to be in volume production in the third quarter. Last quarter, it forecast $500 million in revenue from Gaudi for the second half, a paltry projection compared with Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s (AMD) forecast for its AI accelerator chips, the MI300, which it raised to $4.5 billion in 2024. On Thursday, Gelsinger mentioned AI accelerators a few times but did not give an updated forecast. Intel is also developing AI PC chips, which are also in the early stages of launching later this year.

Earlier this year, Nvidia issued a 10-for-1 stock split, making the stock an even more appealing candidate for a Dow component, since the index is price-weighted. Its previous stratospheric price would have made it a no-go for inclusion in the average.

Intel's stock, on the other hand, is headed toward its worst day since September 2000, if its current pattern in after-hours trading continues Friday.

Nvidia has a solid position as the leading semiconductor giant in the U.S. right now, after years of focusing on the high-performance computing market. And while Intel has continued to manufacture its own chips, it is now also developing a costly business to manufacture chips for other companies, while Nvidia outsources its manufacturing.

The committee that makes the decisions for inclusions in the Dow is known to be extremely secretive. But with the Dow DJIA up 7.1% this year, while the S&P 500 SPX has outpaced it with growth that has doubled, its conceivable that the committee is looking at its components.

Intel's performance and talk of continued challenges should be a wakeup call for investors, and for the committee that makes the Dow's recommendations.

https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240801995/its-time-for-nvidia-to-replace-intel-in-the-dow

Muscle Over Medicine: Why Ozempic Alone Won’t Cut It For Weight Loss

 by Sheramy Tsai via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Numbers indicate that America has an obesity problem. According to a 2023 JAMA article, “U.S. obesity prevalence has surged over the last decade,” with 22 states reporting adult obesity rates at or above 35 percent.

Dr. Gabrielle Lyon, a physician specializing in muscle-centric medicine, offers a different perspective.

We don’t have an obesity epidemic—what we really have is a midlife muscle crisis,” she said in a recent TED Talk.

This shift highlights a crucial yet often overlooked factor in weight management: muscle mass

The Ozempic Issue

The issue of muscle mass versus fat becomes particularly critical as the world turns to a new class of drugs to aid in weight loss.

Medications such as Ozempic, known for their appetite-suppressing effects, promise significant weight loss and are gaining popularity. According to a May KFF health tracking poll, 12 percent of Americans have used the drug. A 2023 study in The Lancet confirms its efficacy, showing that adults lose about 15 percent of their body weight on average with GLP-1 agonists.

Dr. Peter Attia, a physician specializing in longevity, wrote on his website“Not all weight loss is healthy.”

A 2021 clinical trial in the New England Journal of Medicine highlights a concerning downside: With GLP-1 agonists such as Ozempic, about 40 percent of the weight lost is lean mass, including muscle.

“GLP-1 agonists have been celebrated for their potency in reducing body mass, but lean mass accounts for an alarming proportion of this weight loss,” Dr. Attia wrote.

Dr. Attia also said that while GLP-1 agonists such as Ozempic can offer health benefits for obese individuals, they come with risks, especially for those with minimal weight to lose. He added that even obese patients can’t always afford significant lean mass loss, particularly those with sarcopenic obesity—a condition marked by excess fat and low skeletal muscle, common in older adults.

Further reductions in lean mass among those with too little to begin with could pose a greater threat to health and longevity than the presence of excess fat,” Dr. Attia warned.

Lean mass loss is not exclusive to weight loss drugs. When individuals lose weight, they typically shed a combination of fat and fat-free mass, including muscle. Dr. Abud Bakri, an internal medicine doctor, wrote on social media platform X, “ALL caloric restriction causes lean tissue loss, whether that’s through GLP-1, surgery, or aggressive dieting.”

The amount of muscle lost during a caloric deficit depends on factors such as protein intake, resistance training, hormonal status, sleep quality, and many other variables, Dr. Bakri told The Epoch Times in an email.

“Muscle loss is the Achilles’s heel of most conventional weight loss efforts, including GLP-1 agonists, that virtually guarantees that weight is regained as fat,” Dr. William Davis, cardiologist and author of the book “Super Gut,” told The Epoch Times.

“Obesity, at its core, is a disease of the muscle,” Dr. Lyon said in her Ted Talk. “We don’t have a battle of the belly. What we have is a battle of the bicep.”

3 Ways Muscle Aids Weight Management

Muscle plays a key role in managing our weight because it enhances our metabolism, using calories more effectively; regulates glucose, so we are less likely to store calories as fat; and balances hormones, to keep us in better overall metabolic health.

Muscles Enhance Metabolism

We all know someone who seems to be able to eat anything without gaining weight, often attributed to having a “great metabolism.” But what does that really mean?

Metabolism encompasses all the biochemical processes that convert food into energy for essential functions such as cell growth, repair, and maintenance. The total energy used for these functions is known as the metabolic rate.

Lean muscle mass affects the body’s basal metabolic rate (BMR)—the calories burned at rest. Muscle tissue is metabolically active and requires more energy to maintain than fat tissue. Thus, more muscle means more calories burned at rest.

However, the effects of BMR might not be as significant as believed. A 2019 study in Frontiers in Nutrition found that each kilogram of added muscle raises the BMR by only 13 calories per day. Researchers concluded that this change is “non-significant and non-meaningful,” challenging the belief that muscle hypertrophy—an increase in muscle size and strength—substantially boosts daily energy needs.

In her book, “Forever Strong,” Dr. Gabrielle Lyon expands on this idea. “You might have heard that muscle plays the biggest role in using calories and elevating our metabolism while we’re at rest. But don’t be fooled,” she wrote.

While muscle does contribute to calorie burning, Dr. Lyon clarifies that “each pound of muscle burns only about ten calories at rest.”

“The metabolic power is this: Well-trained muscle tissue is more efficient and effective at utilizing calories,” she said.

Well-trained muscle refers to muscle tissue that has been conditioned and strengthened through regular exercise. It enhances metabolism by using energy for protein turnover, aiding the body in maintaining homeostasis.

This insight shifts the focus from the simplistic “calories in versus calories out” model to a more nuanced understanding of how muscle health influences overall energy expenditure and metabolic balance. While muscle itself may not dramatically increase the number of calories burned at rest, well-trained muscles improve the body’s ability to use calories more efficiently, supporting a healthier metabolism and better energy balance.

Muscles Regulate Glucose

Muscles are crucial in regulating glucose levels. During exercise, muscles use glucose for energy, lowering blood sugar levels. Excess glucose can convert to fat, leading to weight gain. Thus, muscles help prevent weight gain by effectively regulating glucose, aiding in weight loss. This is especially important for those with insulin resistance or diabetes, as it helps improve glucose control without relying solely on insulin.

A key benefit of resistance training is the production of myokines, hormones released during muscle contractions. A 2022 study in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences explained that myokines act as chemical signals, promoting glucose uptake in muscle cells and enhancing insulin sensitivity. This helps maintain stable blood sugar levels, reduces the risk of Type 2 diabetes, and supports overall metabolic health.

“Actively working and taxing your muscle tissue will not only help regulate your hormones but will also make you better able to regulate your blood sugar and improve your body composition,” Dr. Lyon wrote in her book.

Muscles Balance Hormones

Muscles aren’t just for movement—they also play a significant role in balancing hormones.

“During the past couple of decades, it has been apparent that skeletal muscle works as an endocrine organ,” a 2020 article in Endocrine Reviews reads.

Muscles produce and secrete hundreds of hormone-like substances that influence various physiological processes, including hormone regulation. These myokines help regulate the release of hormones such as insulin, aiding in metabolic stability.

Muscles also produce hormones such as irisin, which converts white fat to brown fat, enhancing energy expenditure.

“Irisin is secreted from muscles in response to exercise and may mediate some beneficial effects of exercise in humans, such as weight loss,” the “Handbook of Hormones” reads.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is another hormone-like substance released by muscles during exercise. Research in Biological Sciences found that IL-6 boosts fat burning and improves insulin sensitivity, making it easier to lose weight and maintain metabolic health.​

Muscle As Medicine

“We need to change the paradigm of medicine and think about muscle as medicine,” Dr. Lyon said in her Ted Talk.

In her book, she recommends resistance training and a “protein-forward” diet to combat muscle loss. Resistance training promotes muscle growth and maintenance, while protein supplies the building blocks for muscle repair and growth.

According to board-certified nutrition expert JJ Virgin, maintaining and building muscle benefits those using weight loss medications such as GLP-1 agonists. In a podcast, she said that combining these medications with resistance training and a high-protein diet can mitigate muscle loss, leading to more sustainable and healthier weight loss.

Dr. Lyon’s advocacy for muscle as medicine urges a rethinking of traditional weight management strategies. Preserving and building muscle supports better health and enhances weight loss interventions. As people turn to weight loss drugs, surgery, and other methods, addressing muscle loss is crucial for maintaining overall health and achieving long-term success.

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/muscle-over-medicine-why-ozempic-alone-wont-cut-it-weight-loss