Search This Blog

Saturday, February 1, 2025

U.S. wants Ukraine to hold elections following a ceasefire, says Trump envoy

 The United States wants Ukraine to hold elections, potentially by the end of the year, especially if Kyiv can agree a truce with Russia in the coming months, President Donald Trump's top Ukraine official told Reuters.

Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, said in an interview that Ukrainian presidential and parliamentary elections, suspended during the war with Russia, "need to be done".

    "Most democratic nations have elections in their time of war. I think it is important they do so," Kellogg said. "I think it is good for democracy. That's the beauty of a solid democracy, you have more than one person potentially running."

    Trump and Kellogg have both said they are working on a plan to broker a deal in the first several months of the new administration to end the all-out war that erupted with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022.

They have offered few details about their strategy for ending the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War Two, nor when they might unveil such a plan.

The Trump plan is still evolving and no policy decisions have been made, but Kellogg and other White House officials have discussed in recent days pushing Ukraine to agree to elections as part of an initial truce with Russia, two people with knowledge of those conversations and a former U.S. official briefed about the election proposal said.

Trump officials are also debating whether to push for an initial ceasefire before trying to broker a more permanent deal, the two people familiar with the Trump administration discussions said. If presidential elections were to take place in Ukraine, the winner could be responsible for negotiating a longer-term pact with Moscow, the people said.

The sources declined to be named in order to discuss sensitive policy and security issues.

It is unclear how such a Trump proposal would be greeted in Kyiv. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has said Ukraine could hold elections this year if the fighting ends and strong security guarantees are in place to deter Russia from renewing hostilities.

A senior adviser to Kyiv and a Ukrainian government source said the Trump administration has not yet formally requested Ukraine hold presidential elections by the end of the year.

SETTING A TRAP

Zelenskiy's five-year term was supposed to end in 2024 but presidential and parliamentary polls cannot be held under martial law, which Ukraine imposed in February 2022.

Washington raised the issue of elections with senior officials in Zelenskiy's office in 2023 and 2024 during the Biden administration, two former senior U.S. officials said.

State Department and White House officials told their Ukrainian counterparts that elections were critical to uphold international and democratic norms, the officials said.

Officials in Kyiv have pushed back on elections in conversations with Washington in recent months, telling Biden officials that hosting polls at such a volatile moment in Ukraine's history would divide Ukrainian leaders and potentially invite Russian influence campaigns, the two former U.S. officials said.

Asked about what the former Western official and two other people familiar with the matter told Reuters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "We do not have that information."

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was cited by the Interfax news agency on Jan. 27 as saying that direct contacts between Moscow and the Trump administration were not yet underway. The Russian Foreign Ministry says it is still waiting for the U.S. to approve its new pick as Moscow's ambassador in Washington, a post currently unoccupied.    

Putin has said publicly he does not think Zelenskiy is a legitimate leader in the absence of a renewed electoral mandate and that the Ukrainian president does not have the legal right to sign binding documents related to a potential peace deal.

According to the Russian leader, however, Zelenskiy could take part in negotiations in the meantime but must first revoke a 2022 decree he signed banning talks with Russia for as long as Putin is in charge.

The Ukrainian government source said Putin was using the election issue as a false excuse to disrupt future negotiations.

"(He) is setting a trap, claiming that if Ukraine doesn't hold elections, he can later ignore any agreements," the source said.

RUSSIA'S BIDDING?

Ukrainian legislation explicitly prohibits presidential and parliamentary elections being held under martial law.

The former Western official raised concerns about the U.S. push for elections, saying lifting martial law could allow mobilized soldiers to leave the military, trigger an exodus of hard currency and prompt large numbers of draft-age men to "run for the border".

It could also ignite political instability, the source said, because it would make Zelenskiy a lame duck, diluting his power and influence and fueling jockeying by potential challengers.

If Trump pressures Zelenskiy to agree to elections, Washington would be playing into Putin's recent statements questioning the Ukrainian leader's legitimacy, the former Western official said.

"Trump is reacting, in my view, to ... Russian feedback," the official said. "Russia wants to see an end to Zelenskiy."

Some former U.S. officials say they are skeptical that a peace deal can be reached in the coming months or that elections would take place in 2025, particularly because both sides appear to be at odds on how to begin formal negotiations.

The Kremlin has said repeatedly that Putin is open to talks without preconditions.

But William Taylor, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said Putin has shown no readiness for serious negotiations.

Zelenskiy is seeking U.S. and European security guarantees as part of any deal, including the deployment of a foreign military force on the frontlines to ensure Russia abides by any truce.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/exclusive-u-s-wants-ukraine-to-hold-elections-following-a-ceasefire-says-trump-envoy/ar-AA1yeX0J

Kristi Noem stops taxpayer money from funding illegal migrant flood

 For four years, I’ve reported about how a large, organized constellation of United Nations agencies partnered with hundreds of private nonprofit groups to direct billions of mostly US-taxpayer dollars into supporting historic illegal southern border crossing levels during President Joe Biden’s term in office.

Even for the new Trump administration, this conglomerate of 15 UN agencies and 230 NGOs was proposing to spend yet another $1.4 billion on the migration trail in 2025, $1.2 billion more for 2026.

That’s in addition to the more than $6 billion from 2020-2024 during the greatest mass migration event in American history.

Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem said this past week that the Federal government has “stopped all grant funding that’s being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country.”Shutterstock

Separately, hundreds of millions more went through NGOs to migrants arriving on the US side for their soft landing resettlements.

But now it looks like little to none of that funding will come from US taxpayers going forward.

New Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Wednesday issued an “exclusive announcement” to Fox News’ Will Cain that Trump has turned off that firehose.

“We have stopped all grant funding that’s being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country,” Noem said. “I’ve taken action to stop those funds, to re-evaluate them, and to make sure that we’re actually using taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country, to keep people safe.

“We’re not spending another dime to help the destruction of this country.”

This highly consequential sea change is guaranteed to finally bring about a badly needed national policy debate about migration. It’s one that Democrats have worked with their UN, NGO, and US media brethren to squelch throughout Biden’s term in office.

An executive order may be en route with details.

The United Nations is one of the leading NGOs helping illegal migrants reach the US border.

Those are badly needed because Noem didn’t say if the cash halt covers the 15 UN agencies working on the trails too, doing the same work as the NGOs and passing through to them some of that US cash — most of which originates as grants from the US State Department and the US Agency for International Development.

However expansive it turns out to be, Noem’s new move comes far too long after I became the first to report in 2021 that the UN-NGO organization was distributing cash debit cards at a camp in Reynosa, Mexico.

I’d stumbled upon lines of migrant recipients lines of migrant recipients of the cards, my Tweets, and later investigation of this going viral.

Author Todd Bensman with a piece of the fence separating the US from Mexico.Courtesy of Todd Bensman

 I went on to exclusively report on the conglomerate’s other US-funded activities for years more, but NGO-UN allies in the Democratic Party thwarted several Republican efforts to cut the money off.

The enterprise’s kingpins, I frequently reported, were the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the UN International Organization for Migration (IOM), both of which receive billions annually from the United States, the majority of their budgets.

The UN money cannot go unaddressed if the Trump administration is serious about ending US taxpayer support for the nation’s mass migration crises.

On the ground, I often personally observed this mammoth, powerful UN cartel dish out cash cards, food, camping supplies, and legal advice. I once discovered two Jesuit-run NGOs in southern Mexico offering psychologists who would help economic migrants denied asylum dig up their “repressed memories” of more eligible “government persecution.”

Members of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops opened their recent annual meeting by urging President-elect Donald Trump to adopt humane policies toward immigrants and refugees.AP

On an August 2024 reporting trip to Colombia and Panama, I observed farmer’s markets of NGO and UN agency storefronts near bus stops, smuggling boats, and staging areas at the Darien Gap passage to Panama.

Every worker there knew they were aiding and abetting illegal smuggler activity to help migrants illegally enter Panama. In Colombia, none could possibly operate without the express approval of the Clan del Golfo cartel, a vicious cocaine-smuggling paramilitary that ran the region with an iron fist.

I asked a worker manning the booth of the Jewish-affiliated NGO Cadena in the northwestern Colombian town of Necoli — a staging area for smuggler journeys through the Darien Gap in Panama — about her take on US concerns that NGOs like hers helped migrants break laws by handing out food and gear to migrants. “As an organization,” she responded, “we’re not here to judge. We’re just here to provide a service.”

Vice President JD Vance said he was “heartbroken” about condemnation from leading Catholic charities over plans to scale back Federal funding for organizations that facilitate illegal migration.Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire / SplashNews.com

Americans can expect much pushback from religious organizations whose NGOs on both sides of the US border are bloated by record-smashing cash flows padding executive salaries and endowment accounts.

Some 38 of the 230 groups working with the UN south of the border had a religious affiliation, according to the UN-NGO partnership group’s latest budget plan. And the Catholic Church’s NGOs are particularly well represented on both sides of the border.

No doubt the US Conference of Bishops picked a fight with the wrong parishioner recently, Vice President J.D. Vance, who is proud of his late-in-life conversion to Catholicism, for the administration’s immigration policies. When an interviewer asked Vance about the conference’s condemnation, he said he was “heartbroken by that statement” but fired all guns.

Pres. Trump must address funding going to the UN if he wants to end the cash flow to groups facilitating illegal migration.Getty Images

“I think the US Conference of Catholic Bishops needs to actually look in the mirror a little bit and recognize that when they receive over $100 million to help resettle illegal immigrants, are they worried about humanitarian concerns?

Or are they actually worried about their bottom line?” Ouch. Vance’s estimate was actually low, but his suggestion that a crass profit motivation was behind the conference’s morality stance holds up.

Americans should remember the historic-sized cash flows when next they hear organized religious leaders fight for funding restoration on grounds that blocking it was ungodly. Law enforcement investigations of illegal abuses and ending future UN funding would reflect a truer example of God’s work.

Todd Bensman is a senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies

https://nypost.com/2025/02/01/opinion/how-us-taxpayers-funded-the-largest-illegal-migration-in-history/