Search This Blog

Friday, March 14, 2025

Radical left makes it hard to clear hookers from areas like Roosevelt Ave. in Queens

 Roosevelt Avenue in Queens has recently seen a sharp rise in the numbers and visibility of women openly offering sex for money in the shadow of the elevated 7 train.

East New York’s “Penn Track” section has also emerged as a seedy open-sex market, as nearly naked women offer themselves to men in cars, supervised by pimps who use brutality to manage those who are essentially their slaves.

These scenes were familiar sights in the city three decades ago, when prostitutes freely roamed the streets near the Lincoln Tunnel or pursued the hotel trade on Sixth Avenue near Central Park.

The era of “broken windows” policing and the rise of online “escort” advertising mostly eliminated the plague of open sex for sale. 

00:00
04:23

But in recent years, state and city “reforms,” an abandonment of quality-of-life policing and the migrant influx has led to a return of the seedy cityscapes.

The good news?

Mayor Eric Adams is having cops crack down on areas like Roosevelt Avenue, and new Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch is again emphasizing quality-of-life issues, like prostitution plaguing neighborhoods — with plans to hold cops accountable for addressing them.

Still, eliminating the scourge completely will be difficult, thanks to opposition from the left and the handcuffs they’ve put on cops.

Over the years, reformers have insisted that many prostitutes were victims of coercion and violence.

This prompted New York to divert many of those arrested in the sex trade to special courts aimed at providing services to women now treated as victims rather than criminals.

The courts link women arrested for prostitution “to tailored counseling and case management services, which range from shelter and health care to immigration assistance, drug treatment, and counseling.”

Cops also began focusing on johns rather the hookers themselves, an approach backed by some feminist groups but opposed by organizations such as the ACLU, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which favor complete decriminalization of the sex industry.

At the same time, the internet drove much of the trade indoors and off the streets.

The result: The city’s annual prostitution-related arrests have trended down, falling from tens of thousands in the 1980s to just over 100 by 2022.

Yet, recently, amid a broader collapse in proactive policing, the decriminalization of public drinking and urination, the elimination of cash bail for almost all crimes and the influx of migrants, street hookers have begun to reappear.

And pro-hooker radicals, dissatisfied with what they see as the slow pace of reform, continue to push for total decriminalization.

Their cause took a step forward in 2021, when New York state actually repealed a 1976 law criminalizing “loitering for the purpose of engaging in prostitution.”

Dubbed the “walking while trans” law, it was supposedly abused by police as a pretext for harassing people identifying as transgender.

The NYPD, however, claims that the loitering statute was generally employed as a response to community quality-of-life complaints, and champions of repeal offer no data substantiating the contention that the law was enforced mostly against those who identified as trans.

The drive for total decriminalization boasts prominent supporters: Socialist state Sen. Julia Salazar, who represents parts of Brooklyn with high levels of loitering arrests, is among the most radical New York advocates for hookers’ rights.

“I think that the goal should be decriminalization,” she said at a 2018 meeting of activists.

Her Senate colleague — and 2025 mayoral candidate — Jessica Ramos, whose Queens district includes a stretch of Roosevelt Avenue where the NYPD claims to have spotted suspected prostitutes alongside members of the vicious Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, said the loitering law was “no different than terrible policing policies, like Stop and Frisk, and only targets the most vulnerable populations in my district.”

She’s right that it was like other policing policies though wrong that those policies were “terrible.”

Indeed, laws against loitering for prostitution are useful tools for disrupting antisocial behavior, just as stop-and-frisk was a useful tool for police to get guns off the street.

Removing these tactics from the crime-prevention arsenal has predictably resulted in more gunshot deaths and the spread of human trafficking across New York City.

In the name of protecting “vulnerable populations,” the left has made New Yorkers more vulnerable to crime and disorder.

Seth Barron’s next book, “Weaponized,” will be published in 2025. Adapted from City Journal.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/14/opinion/the-radical-left-is-making-it-hard-to-clear-hookers-from-areas-like-roosevelt-ave-in-queens/

Bondi tells Tesla vandals to ‘watch out’

 Attorney General Pam Bondi warned Tesla vandals to “watch out” Friday, as the Trump administration seeks to crack down on those targeting Tesla dealerships and cars.

Bondi said she has opened an investigation into the violent demonstrations taking aim at Elon Musk’s electric vehicle (EV) company. 

“They are targeting Tesla dealerships, the stations where you charge a Tesla, they’re vandalizing cars,” she told Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria.”

“I have already directed an investigation be opened to see how is this being funded, who is behind this, doing this?”  

“We have people we’re locking up on that,” she continued. “We have someone in jail right now from one of the dealerships. They threw a Molotov cocktail through a dealership. They’re looking at up to 20 years in prison.”  

A Colorado woman was arrested last month for allegedly spray painting “Nazi” on the sign at a Tesla dealership and igniting Molotov cocktails during multiple visits.  

“If you’re going to touch a Tesla, go to a dealership, do anything, you better watch out because we’re coming after you,” Bondi added. 

Protesters have targeted Tesla showrooms in recent weeks, and several dealerships, cars and charging stations have been vandalized. 

Tesla has become a key target amid frustration with Musk’s prominent and controversial role in the Trump administration, where he has led the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) push to slash government spending, often through massive cuts to the federal workforce and federal funding and grants. 

The EV company’s stock has plummeted, falling 15 percent Monday alone and nearly 30 percent over the past month. 

President Trump has attempted to show support for his close ally amid the turmoil, arguing he’s being “treated unfairly.” Trump promised to buy Tesla on Tuesday, testing out several different models parked outside the White House. 

He also hinted he would be open to labeling those who carry out violence at Tesla dealerships as “domestic terrorists.” 

“I will do that, I’ll do it. I’m going to stop them,” Trump said Tuesday when a reporter noted that some people think those responsible should be labeled domestic terrorists. 

“Those people are going to go through a big problem when we catch them,” he said, adding, “Let me tell you, you do it to Tesla, and you do it to any company, we’re going to catch you and you’re going to go through hell.”   

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) also said Wednesday that Congress would investigate the attacks on Tesla vehicles and their owners, touting Musk’s “heroic work” and describing the incidents as “domestic terrorism.” 

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5195750-bondi-tells-tesla-vandals-to-watch-out/

10 Democrats help Republicans advance GOP funding bill to avoid shutdown

 A group of 10 Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), on Friday voted to advance a Republican-crafted bill to fund the government through Sept. 30, taking a crucial step toward avoiding a government shutdown while infuriating many within their own party.

The pivotal procedural vote, which passed 62-28, puts the bill on a glidepath to pass the Senate sometime Friday afternoon, despite fierce opposition from many Democrats.

The Democrats who voted to advance the measure included Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.) and Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), and Angus King (Maine), an independent who caucuses with Democrats. 

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) announced an agreement shortly before 4:30 pm Friday to vote to immediately advance the House-passed funding bill and consider four amendments to the legislation. 

One amendment sponsored by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) would reinstate veterans who were fired from their federal jobs under Trump. Another sponsored by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) would eliminate the Department of Government Efficiency. A third sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) would codify the cuts to foreign assistance recommended by the Department of Government Efficiency. 

All of the amendments are expected to fail. 

Schumer opened the door for some Democratic colleagues to vote to advance the bill by announcing Thursday that he would do so to avoid a government shutdown.

He warned a shutdown would give Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk — Trump’s chief budget cutter — tremendous leverage to keep federal employees out of work and to keep federal agencies shuttered for weeks, or even months.

“Government funding expires at midnight tonight. As I announced yesterday, I will vote to keep the government open. I believe it is the best way to minimize the harm that the Trump administration will do to the American people,” Schumer said on the floor before the vote.

Sen. John Fetterman (D), who represents Pennsylvania, a state Trump carried in 2024, said he would vote to advance the House GOP bill because he feared a government shutdown would hurt too many people.

“I’m going to stand on what I happen to believe is the right thing to do,” he said. “What’s the exit plan once we shut the government down? What about the millions of Americans who are going to have their lives damaged?”

But Schumer’s decision to vote to advance the bill, which he acknowledged Thursday is a “very bad” bill, has sparked an angry backlash from Democratic progressives and House leaders.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) warned that Schumer would be making a “tremendous mistake.”

After learning of Schumer’s decision, Ocasio-Cortez told reporters that “there is a deep sense of outrage and betrayal.”

“And this is not just about progressive Democrats. This is across the board, the entire party,” she said.

Ocasio-Cortez said Schumer had betrayed House Democrats in districts that Trump won in 2024 who took very tough votes against the bill earlier this week. Only a single Democrat voted for the measure in the House.

She said those vulnerable House Democrats took a tough vote “to defend the American people, in order to defend Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, just to see some Senate Democrats” acquiesce to Musk.

“I think it is a huge slap in the face,” she said.

House Democratic leadership had also spent the week pressing Senate Democrats to hold firm and block the bill.

“We’re standing on the side of working families, and that’s why our message to the Senate is also: Stand with us on that side,” House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) said earlier this week. “And we think that our vote gives the Senate the strength and the message that they need to stand up as well.”

Asked repeatedly on Friday before the vote whether he had lost confidence in Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) demurred.

“Next question,” he said.

And several vulnerable Democratic senators came out against the bill as well, including Sens. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) and Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), who announced Thursday they would oppose the House bill.

“This bill is bad for Michigan. It makes significant cuts to Michigan’s key infrastructure projects, cuts the [Department of Veterans Affairs] and harms our Great Lakes,” Slotkin said.

Ossoff argued the House bill “irresponsibly fails to impose any constraints on the reckless and out-of-control Trump administration.”

The Democratic activists group Pass the Torch on Friday called for Schumer to resign as Senate minority leader.

But Schumer argued that as bad as Democrats think the House-passed bill is, it is a better option than letting the government shut down at midnight.

Schumer called it a “Hobson’s choice,” in other words a seeming choice where in reality there’s only one viable option.

“The CR is a bad bill but as bad as the CR is, I believe that allowing Trump to take more power is a far worse option,” he said Friday morning. “A shutdown would allow [the Department of Government Efficiency] to shift into overdrive.”

Schumer has battled with progressives in his own caucus as well, such as Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who have called on colleagues to push for a 30-day clean stopgap funding measure and to oppose the House-passed bill.

Sanders argued on the Senate floor that passing the House GOP-drafted funding bill would worsen the crises facing the nation.

“It makes a bad situation much worse,” he said. “It makes the financial struggles of working people even more difficult than they are today. And it does all of that … to lay the groundwork for massive tax breaks for Elon Musk and the billionaire class.”

Merkley told CNN in an interview that he was “hell no” on the House bill.

He argued that accepting the House GOP bill would only embolden Trump and Musk.

“You don’t stop a bully by handing over your lunch money, and you don’t stop a tyrant by giving him more power,” he said.

Sen. Andy Kim (D), a freshman from New Jersey, said he understood why Schumer and other Democratic colleagues voted for the House-passed bill, but he argued that Democrats need to send a message by standing up to Trump and his GOP-allies.

“I understand these concerns” about a government shutdown, he said. “It’s a real no-win situation for America — not just for Democrats in the Senate but for the country. Either way, people are going to get hurt. I understand the concerns about the potential for a shutdown. I don’t want it.

“But I disagree in terms of how this is unfolding,” he said of the expectation the House bill would advance with some Democratic support.

“A shutdown does give a tremendous leeway to [the Office of Management and Budget] to determine how limited resources are prioritized and triaged. There is no one in this administration more dangerous than [OMB Director] Russell Vought right now,” Kim acknowledged.

But he argued that Trump, Musk and Vought “are already taking such actions to shut down the government.”

“I personally believe you need to stand up to that type of action,” he said. “I understand there’s deep uncertainty about what would have happened next but I for one was willing to go down that path.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5195254-gop-funding-bill-democrats-advance-senate/

Newsom tells Senate Dems to ‘do the right thing,’ oppose CR

 California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has called on Senate Democrats “to stand up and do the right thing” and vote no on the GOP-backed stopgap bill that would avert a looming government shutdown.

“Passing this bill would give Republicans 6 months to consolidate power in the Executive branch and wreak havoc on our country. They are already threatening social security and Medicare. Gutting the Department of Education. Firing veterans. Vandalizing basic environmental protections. This will only allow them to continue that,” he said Friday in a post on social platform X.

“They will go on to cut funding and punish states that don’t do their bidding. There’s still time to do the right thing. VOTE NO,” he added.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), who like Newsom is seen as a prospective presidential candidate for Democrats, also urged his party to oppose the measure.

“Republicans in Congress have abdicated their responsibility to critically evaluate the damage Donald Trump is doing to critical services the American people need. Democrats have the ability to force bipartisanship and bring the two sides together to make a budget that reflects priorities we all ought to share,” he said in a statement Friday.

Pritzker called Republicans “reckless,” accusing them of playing politics with people’s livelihood.

“Veterans will have trouble getting healthcare. Workers will lose jobs when infrastructure projects grind to a halt. Preschools will lose teachers and parents will be left without childcare. Make no mistake: people will suffer the consequences of their negligence,” he said.

“Democrats have the power to stop the cessation of power to Donald Trump and Elon Musk and they should use it. I urge a no vote on the Continuing Resolution,” Pritzker added.

The House approved the spending measure earlier this week, but just one House Democrat supported it.

In the Senate, progressive Democrats have been calling on their party to oppose the measure, but Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening he would back the measure. Schumer said he thought the GOP bill was bad legislation but that a shutdown would be worse.

It appeared that 10 Senate Democrats including Schumer would back the measure, which would give the legislation more than the 60 votes needed for passage.

https://thehill.com/homenews/5195781-newsom-urges-democrats-stop-gop/

Trump suggests media actions be deemed illegal

 President Trump railed against the media on Friday, suggesting that some of the actions of the press be deemed illegal and should be investigated.

In a speech at the Department of Justice (DOJ), during which Trump railed against people and entities that he claims have targeted him, said that he views CNN and MSNBC as corrupt.

“I believe that CNN and MS-DNC, who literally write 97.6 percent bad about me, are political arms of the Democrat Party and in my opinion, they’re really corrupt and they’re illegal, what do they do is illegal,” Trump said.

He also claimed the media outlets work in coordination and that their reporting is able to influence the opinions of judges.

“These networks and these newspapers are really no different than a highly paid political operative,” Trump said.

“And it has to stop, it has to be illegal, it’s influencing judges and it’s really, eh, changing law and it just cannot be legal. I don’t believe it’s legal and they do it in total coordination with each other,” he added.

Trump’s speech at DOJ was rare for any president. During his remarks, he attacked the Biden administration, claimed he has been politically persecuted, and name-checked those that he thinks have unfairly targeted him.

The White House and the news media have sparred in recent weeks, including when the administration announced it would take over the press pool, taking that control away from the White House Correspondents’ Association.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last month that moving forward, the White House press pool, a small group of reporters that travels with and covers the president’s daily activities, will now be determined by administration officials.

The White House is also in an ongoing fight with the Associated Press over the outlet’s decision not to fully adopt the name “Gulf of America” instead of Gulf of Mexico into its widely influential Stylebook, used by news media organizations across the U.S.

The White House has restricted the AP’s access to the Oval Office and Air Force One, not allowing the outlet to be in the press pool, and the AP is challenging the White House’s action in court.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5195881-trump-media-illegal/