Search This Blog

Monday, April 7, 2025

Trump economic shake-up is a shock to the system— that could pay off big

 As President Trump rolls out his economic program, there’s one question I haven’t seen asked much: What if it works?

Trump’s supporters are rooting for its success. His opponents, out of a mixture of envy and self-interest, hope it craters. 

But what would actually happen if Trump achieves his aims?

The White House hasn’t released a single integrated document spelling out its economic plan. But based on the moves made so far, and comments from Trump’s top economic aides, the outlines of his goals are coming clear.

First, he’s looking to increase wages for working-class Americans, the core basis — though not, as we’ll see, the only one — for his tariff package

Trump wants to encourage businesses to move manufacturing to the United States, and we have in fact seen quite a few announcements of major new investments since his tariff plans were unveiled. 

More than 70 countries have already approached the White House to talk about mutual tariff-reduction deals, and Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu zipped to Washington Monday to negotiate one in person.

Rolling back illegal immigration will also help boost working-class wages. People claim illegal aliens “do the jobs Americans won’t do,” but it’s more accurate to say they “do the jobs Americans won’t do at absurdly low wages.”

Progressives once appreciated this basic fact.

In 2008 Jared Bernstein, a longtime economic adviser to Joe Biden, wrote, “A surefire way to reconnect the fortunes of working people  . . . to the growing economy is to let the job market tighten up. A tight job market pressures employers to boost wage offers to get and keep the workers they need.”

Conversely, Bernstein explained, “One equally surefire way to short-circuit this useful dynamic is to turn on the immigrant spigot every time some group’s wages go up.” 

Years later, that’s exactly what the Biden administration chose to do.

The Congressional Budget Office projected last year that the Biden immigration surge would put downward pressure on wages for at least a decade into the future. 

Trump’s immigration crackdown is meant to reverse that.

Trump also aims to make it easier to start, operate and expand businesses, and easier to hire workers (legal ones, that is), by easing up on federal regulations. That will boost employment and wages, as well as increase tax revenue.

And extending his 2017 tax cuts — as the Senate voted to do last week when it unlocked its budget “reconciliation” process — will also help working families.

Second, Trump is looking to reduce federal spending, deficits and the national debt. 

In fact, his tariff proposals are already doing that — before they’ve even taken effect — by driving down interest rates on Treasury bonds.

The lower the interest rate, the smaller our debt payments, and the less in the way of tax increases or program cuts will be needed to bring the budget under control. 

This is essential: The nation had been rushing headlong toward financial collapse

Lower rates on Treasury bonds will also help tamp down inflation — which was spurred by the government’s reckless spending, first during the COVID pandemic and then under Biden.

That’s a huge boost to the finances of working families. So is the ongoing decline in mortgage rates, which accompanies the drop in Treasury interest rates.

Third, the president is choking off funding for the nation’s political, managerial, academic and media elites, even as he reduces their power and influence. 

Elon Musk’s project has revealed just a slice of the various forms of grift and graft these groups have reaped, to the tune of billions — possibly trillions — over recent years. 

Trump is ripping apart these insiders’ patronage networks, often involving the laundering of government funds through various think tanks, nonprofits and NGOs, built up over decades.

He’s putting their prestige and their phony-baloney jobs in danger, and their howls have only just begun.

Finally, Trump wants increased democratic accountability. 

The decline of the “invisible government” of unelected bureaucrats, NGOs and the like will return power to elected officials, accountable to the voters — and Democrats hate that. 

This weekend’s “Hands Off” protests were revealing: By telling the elected president to keep his “hands off” the government, they were really telling ordinary Americans to keep their hands off this bloated, unresponsive bureaucracy.

U.S. President Donald Trump in a meeting in the Oval Office at the White House
President Donald Trump sits in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on April 7.REUTERS

So what if Trump’s policies work? 

We’ll see a fast-growing economy providing more jobs and better pay for Americans, especially working-class Americans.  

The budget will move toward balance. 

The “parasite class” of bureaucrats, academics, lobbyists and so on will have much less influence. 

And the nation will stop pouring money into the pockets of unproductive hangers-on.

Which is why Trump’s critics aren’t afraid he will fail: They’re afraid that he’ll succeed.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds is a professor of law at the University of Tennessee and founder of the InstaPundit.com blog.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/07/opinion/how-trumps-economic-shake-up-could-pay-off-big/

Supreme Court lifts block on Trump using Alien Enemies Act to deport suspected Venezuelan gangs

 The Trump administration will be allowed to resume deporting suspected Venezuelan gangbangers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act after the Supreme Court on Monday lifted a lower court order that blocked the deportations.

DC District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg had blocked President Trump from invoking the rarely used wartime law last month, and later extended his temporary restraining order until at least April 12.

The Trump administration will be allowed to resume deporting suspected Venezuelan gangbangers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.REUTERS
The Supreme Court on Monday lifted a lower court order that blocked the deportations.AFP via Getty Images
Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act for the first time since World War II last month in an effort to quickly deport alleged Tren de Aragua members to a mega-prison in El Salvador.REUTERS

The Trump administration filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court to review Boasberg’s pause on March 28, after a divided three-judge panel on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a request to lift the stay as litigation plays out.

Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act for the first time since World War II last month in an effort to quickly deport alleged Tren de Aragua members to a mega-prison in El Salvador.

Trump, 78, considers the gang an invading force, whose presence in the US grew under the Biden administration’s lax immigration and border policies.

This is a developing story. Check back for more information.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/07/us-news/supreme-court-lifts-order-blocking-trump-from-using-alien-enemies-act-to-deport-suspected-venezuelan-gang-members/

US Health Department will make new fluoride recommendation

 The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will be reconvening an independent panel of health experts to make a new recommendation on putting fluoride in drinking water, a spokesperson said on Monday.

The use of the mineral, which is added to water to strengthen tooth enamel and promote dental health, has been a hot-button political issue in some states for decades.

"HHS is reconvening the Community Preventive Services Task Force to study and make a new recommendation on fluoride," an HHS spokesperson said.

The statement followed an Associated Press report quoting Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. saying at an event in Salt Lake City, Utah, that he plans to tell the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to stop recommending fluoride in drinking water.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will also review new scientific information on the potential health risks of fluoride in drinking water in coordination with HHS, an initial step toward deciding on standards for its inclusion, Administrator Lee Zeldin said at the same event, according to an EPA statement.

Utah became the first U.S. state to ban the use of fluoride in public water systems after Governor Spencer Cox signed legislation to that effect last month.

The American Dental Association opposed the Utah law and has maintained support for community water fluoridation to help prevent tooth decay.

The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that drinking water levels for fluoride remain below 0.7 milligram per liter.

Levels above 1.5 mg/L, twice the recommended limit, are known to increase health risks such as bone fractures, thyroid disease and nervous system damage.

The enforceable limit as currently set by the EPA is 4.0 mg/L. In September 2024, a federal judge in California ordered the EPA to strengthen its regulations, saying the compound poses an unreasonable potential risk to children at levels that are currently typical nationwide.

Kennedy, who opposes the addition of fluoride to public water systems, has claimed in the absence of conclusive evidence that water fluoridation at U.S. levels is associated with numerous health issues including cancer.

About 63% of all Americans have fluoride in their community water systems, according to CDC statistics as of 2022.

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/US-Health-Department-will-make-new-fluoride-recommendation-49552868/

CMS Finalizes 2026 Payment Policy Updates for Medicare Advantage and Part D

 Payments from the government to MA plans are expected to increase on average by 5.06% from 2025 to 2026. This is an increase of 2.83 percentage points since the CY 2026 Advance Notice, which is largely attributable to an increase in the effective growth rate. The method for setting the effective growth rate is set in statute and represents the average expected change in the benchmarks, used to determine payment for MA plans, based on the growth in Medicare per capita costs. The effective growth rate is 9.04%, which is higher than the estimate of 5.93% in the CY 2026 Advance Notice. This change is primarily due to the inclusion of additional data on fee-for-service (FFS) expenditures, including payment data through the fourth quarter of 2024, which was not included on account of the early Advance Notice publication. 

In CY 2024, CMS initiated a three-year, phased-in approach for removing the medical education costs — related to services MA enrollees receive — from the historical and projected expenditures supporting the FFS costs that are included in the growth rate calculations. For CY 2026, CMS will complete the phase-in of the technical adjustment by applying 100% of the adjustment for MA-related medical education costs.

CMS is also completing a three-year phase-in of improvements to the MA risk adjustment model that the agency finalized in the CY 2024 Rate Announcement, with the first year of the three-year phase-in starting with CY 2024. CMS is committed to expanding access to affordable, high-quality care through Medicare Advantage, while also implementing measures to safeguard beneficiaries and taxpayers from waste, fraud, and abuse. These ongoing improvements support a sustainable program that benefits both current and future Medicare recipients.

CMS is concurrently releasing the Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions that continue to implement the redesign of the Medicare Part D program. These instructions contain a detailed description of, and guidance related to, changes to the Part D drug benefit in place for CY 2026. 

The CY 2026 MA and Part D Rate Announcement may be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-announcement.pdf

A fact sheet discussing the provisions of the CY 2026 Rate Announcement can be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2026-medicare-advantage-and-part-d-rate-announcement

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-finalizes-2026-payment-policy-updates-medicare-advantage-and-part-d-programs

CVRx Reports Preliminary First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

  CVRx, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVRX) ("CVRx"), a commercial-stage medical device company, today announced certain preliminary unaudited first quarter 2025 revenue results.

“While we continue to make significant progress in driving adoption of Barostim, first quarter revenue fell short of our expectations,” said Kevin Hykes, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVRx. “A core element of the commercial strategy initiated last year has been to build a world-class sales organization. As part of this effort, we brought in a number of new high-quality sales representatives in the back half of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025. We are thrilled with the level of talent we have attracted to strengthen our team, but many of these newer sales representatives are still in the early stages of territory development. In addition, the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by seasonal softness, as patients and customers schedule procedures around insurance coverage and deductibles. We did not fully anticipate this impact because past first quarter events, including COVID spikes, material clinical data releases, and management changes, likely obscured the magnitude of first-quarter seasonality.”

“Despite the disappointing revenue performance in the quarter, we remain confident in our ability to drive growth in Barostim adoption. We continue to believe that our strategic focus on driving deep penetration within high-potential accounts will unlock higher future growth. We look forward to providing further information on the earnings call with the release of our full first quarter results in early May.”

First Quarter 2025
Total revenue for the first quarter of 2025 is expected to be approximately $12.3 million, representing an increase of approximately 15% over first quarter 2024 revenue of $10.8 million. Total revenue generated in the first quarter of 2024 is expected to be comprised of approximately $11.2 million in U.S. revenue and $1.1 million in European revenue.

As of March 31, 2025, the Company had a total of 227 active implanting centers in the U.S., as compared to 223 as of December 31, 2024. The number of sales territories in the U.S. decreased by 3 to a total of 45 during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

As of March 31, 2025, cash and cash equivalents were $102.7 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company issued 543,462 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $9.5 million under its at-the-market offering.

First Quarter 2025 Earnings Release Webcast and Conference Call Information
The Company plans to release first quarter 2025 financial and operating results after market close on Thursday, May 8, 2025. The Company will host a conference call to review its results at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time the same day.

A live webcast of the investor conference call will be available online at the investor relations page of the Company’s website at ir.cvrx.com. To listen to the conference call on your telephone, please dial 1-800-445-7795 for U.S. callers, or 1-785-424-1699 for international callers, approximately ten minutes prior to the start time. Please reference the following conference ID to access the call: CVRXQ125.

https://www.morningstar.com/news/globe-newswire/9418140/cvrx-reports-preliminary-first-quarter-2025-financial-results

US Conference Of Catholic Bishops Ends Refugee Program After USAID Funding Cut

 The days of the Catholic Church receiving billions from U.S. taxpayers appear to be over. Earlier this year, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) cut funding to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). On Monday, the non-governmental organization (NGO)—which has been highly sympathetic to nation-killing policies promoted by the rudderless Democratic Party, including open borders on both the southern and northern fronts—announced that its partnerships with the federal government to provide refugee support services have ended.

AP News reported that the USCCB's move to end its 50 years of partnerships with the federal government to serve refugees comes after USAID slashed funding for refugee resettlement programs. 

"As a national effort, we simply cannot sustain the work on our own at current levels or in current form," stated USCCB President Archbishop Timothy Broglio, adding, "We will work to identify alternative means of support for the people the federal government has already admitted to these programs. We ask your prayers for the many staff and refugees impacted."

USCCB does not plan to revive existing federal government agreements for refugee resettlement programs.

The NGO sued the Trump administration earlier this year, claiming the president's order that suspended refugee grants was illegal and asked for millions in what it claimed was owed to Catholic charities. However, a federal judge denied USCCB's request.

In late January, Vice President JD Vance told Margaret Brennan of CBS's Face Nation, "I believe the US Conference of Catholic Bishops — if they're worried about the humanitarian costs of immigration enforcement, let them talk about the children who have been sex trafficked because of the wide open border."

Catholic charities received taxpayer monies through grants from USAID, the Department of Health and Human Services, and other agencies, totaling billions. 

Notice how grant awards to the NGO soared during the Biden years—right as the migrant invasion was in full swing.

The grift is over. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/us-conference-catholic-bishops-ends-refugee-program-after-usaid-funding-cut

Title IX And Trump 2.0: No More Radicalism Masquerading As Civil Rights

 by Teresa Manning via American Greatness,

Last week, the Trump Administration dropped Biden’s appeal of a July Oklahoma court ruling on Title IX. The ruling had stopped Biden’s April 2024 Title IX regulation from taking effect, joining several other courts that also found the rule both illegal and unconstitutional since it gutted due process, chilled free speech, and imposed fringe sexual politics on schools, including allowing men on women’s teams and in women’s locker rooms and bathrooms.

In January, a Kentucky court went further than the one in Oklahoma, finding the Biden rule so unlawful that the court enjoined the rule nationwide in what is called a vacatur opinion—essentially, taking the Biden rule completely off the books. In this extraordinary opinion, Kentucky Judge Danny C. Reeves found that the Biden Education Department had violated Title IX itself – the very legislation authorizing federal civil rights officials to make rules for Title IX –  by promoting gender ideology, stating the Biden rule “turns Title IX on its head.” The Department was denying women equal opportunity in school athletics and their privacy rights. In addition, the Kentucky court found the Biden rule flouted other federal statutes, such as the Administrative Procedures Act. This meant the rule also represented illicit agency overreach.

The Reeves opinion then directed schools to continue to comply with the Title IX regulation already in place since 2020 and promulgated under the first Trump administration. (Trump’s Education Department reinforced the Kentucky court order with its own Dear Colleague Letter to schools in February.) That Trump rule, in direct contrast to Biden’s attempted regulation, protects both women’s spaces and also free speech—it does not allow gender ideologues to demand that others use their preferred pronouns, for example—as well as due process for those accused of possible Title IX offenses.

But Trump 2.0 has strengthened Title IX policy even more with multiple executive orders. In February was Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports, which not only cited the federal case law against Biden’s rule but then ordered federal and state officials, such as state attorneys general and the secretary of state’s representative to the United Nations, to issue guidance on protecting women athletes and women’s spaces in both national and international competition.

In January, EO 14168, Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government, was signed. More fundamentally, it recognizes the reality of male and female and places federal policy squarely on the side of reality and truth, not on the side of zany ideology and deceit, a not-so-veiled reference to Biden politicos and gender activists.

Predictably, both government and academic officials have resisted this restoration of common sense. Specifically, the Maine Education Department implied it would continue to have men on women’s teams, whereupon $30 million of federal funding was promptly paused while federal officials investigated it. Likewise, $175 million of federal funds has just been paused at the University of Pennsylvania for its similar policies allowing men in women’s sports. The University of Pennsylvania is most infamous on this point since it was home to the transvestite swimmer, Will Thomas, aka Lia Thomas, who ended up robbing female swimmer Riley Gaines of her title at the 2022 NCAA swimming championships, Women’s Division. She has since become a nationally recognized spokeswoman for preserving women’s sports—for women.

Of course, most recently, President Trump also signed a March 20 executive order to close the Department of Education. This affects Title IX since oversight of Title IX complaints is within the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights or “OCR.” Trump’s March 20 EO is titled Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities. The operative language is in Section 2, reading, “The Secretary of Education shall, to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the states and local communities …”

The president wants states and local communities to take the lead in education, as they did for most of America’s history before the federal Department of Education was created in 1980.

But what about Title IX? Enforcement of this nondiscrimination law and civil rights in education is handled by the Education Department’s OCR, now presumably on the chopping block along with most of the rest of the department. Many think that other offices of civil rights could take this over—the Justice Department, for example, has its own Office for Civil Rights and could add sex discrimination in education (that is, Title IX) to its responsibilities, just as the Department of Health and Human Services has an OCR and could take on matters concerning students with disabilities.

Whether such transitions bode well or ill for sound Title IX policy isn’t yet clear. But what is clear is Trump’s determination to discard the ideological extremism that the Biden Administration was advancing with Title IX and, specifically, with rules issued in its name. So while some questions remain, some certainty also exists about Title IX’s immediate future: No more radicalism masquerading as civil rights. And that’s more good news from Trump 2.0.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/title-ix-and-trump-20-no-more-radicalism-masquerading-civil-rights