Search This Blog

Sunday, April 27, 2025

Albertsons warns suppliers company is ‘not accepting cost increases’ over tariffs

 The buck stops with them.

North America’s second-largest supermarket chain is warning its suppliers that it won’t allow price hikes due to President Trump’s tariff spree.

Albertsons, which operates over 2,200 grocery stores — including Balducci’s, Kings and Acme in the New York area, blasted out a missive to its suppliers late last month, explaining that suppliers must get authorization for significant price hikes.

“With few exceptions, we are not accepting cost increases due to tariffs,” stated the letter, first uncovered by American Economic Liberties Project researcher Matt Stoller.

Albertsons told its suppliers that it wants them to eat the tariff-induced price hikes.JHVEPhoto – stock.adobe.com

“Suppliers are not permitted to include tariff-related costs in invoices without prior authorization by Albertsons Companies,” the Idaho-based chain added, “Any invoices that include such charges without prior authorization will be subject to dispute and may result in payment delays.”

If suppliers want to fight for an exemption, they must file notice three months in advance by filling out forms detailing the impact of tariffs on their products and provide evidence.

From there, Albertsons will review the request, which can take 30 days. The grocery conglomerate warned that securing a price hike “is not guaranteed.”

Stoller, who does anti-monopoly research, blasted Albertsons’ demands, suggesting they are unreasonable.

President Trump’s tariffs have caused markets to reel.ZUMAPRESS.com

“That’s absurd, since the cost of many items is going to spike, and suppliers will go out of business if they can’t cover those increased costs,” he wrote in a newsletter. “Yet, the arrogance speaks to the power of buyers like Albertsons. And Albertsons is nothing compared to Walmart or Amazon.”

Over recent weeks, Trump has slapped a 10% baseline tariff rate against virtually all goods coming into the US. He’s also imposed a 25% automotive tariff, 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, and 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico that don’t comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

Products coming in from China are subject to a 145% rate, with limited exceptions.

Meanwhile, the president has given countries until July 8 to hash out a new trade arrangement with the US or face even more tariffs, with customized rates per country.

In response, prominent retailers have been ramping up the pressure on their suppliers not to raise prices.

President Trump is trying to negotiate lightning trade deals with countries over the next three months.AFP via Getty Images

Walmart, for example, has pressed its Chinese suppliers to make price cuts to mitigate the tariffs’ impact, but the Chinese government has sought to counter that effort, Bloomberg reported.

Amazon is also working to negotiate some of its contracts down to keep prices from increasing significantly.

Stoller believes that the current dynamic is similar to the “Covid supply shock moment.”

“A lot of orders are going to be canceled, and shortages and price changes are going to happen in weird and unpredictable ways,” he predicted.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/27/us-news/albertsons-supermarket-chain-warns-suppliers-not-to-raise-prices-over-trump-tariffs/

New FDNY order sending patients to closest hospital provokes backlash

 A new city Fire Department directive aimed at slashing the rise in 911 response times has provoked a huge backlash, with patients and hospitals claiming it’s actually jeopardizing safety instead of being a lifesaver.

FDNY Commissioner Robert Tucker imposed a rule March 12 requiring EMS ambulance crews to transport all patients — whether their condition is life-threatening — to the nearest hospital, not one where the patients have a relationship with their doctor or where they prefer to go.

FDNY Commissioner Robert Tucker imposed a rule requiring EMS ambulance crews to transport all patients to the nearest hospital.AP

The previous directive only required ambulance crews to deliver patients to the closest hospital during severe or life-threatening medical emergencies.

The selection of the hospital is aided by a computer.

In rare instances, an appeal to a tele-FDNY doctor can overturn the computer-aided decision.

The new policy is too rigid and undermines patient safety and care, said Dr. Bret Rudy, executive vice president and chief of hospital operation at NYU Langone Hospital-Brooklyn.

He said that for example, a patient with a broken hip was recently sent to the emergency department of a hospital that didn’t have an orthopedic surgeon to perform surgery. NYU Langone’s team ended up going to the other hospital to transfer the patient to Langone for surgery.

“This policy does not produce good outcomes. It’s going to result in bad outcomes,” Rudy warned to The Post.

“It’s putting more patients at risk.”

The new policy is too rigid and undermines patient safety and care, said NYU Langone Hospital-Brooklyn’s Dr. Bret Rudy.NYU Langone

The new directive has led to confrontations between patients and ambulance crews, too.

Eli Gottlieb, 84, said he was suffering from kidney failure and that his doctor, who was affiliated with Mt. Sinai Brooklyn, told him to call 911 for an ambulance to take him to the facility.

Gottlieb said he sat in an ambulance for 30 minutes as he haggled with its crew, which was instructed to take him to Maimonides Midwood Community Hospital.

Gottlieb refused to go there, noting that the hospital that treats him, Mt. Sinai Brooklyn, was not much farther away from his home.

The ambulance crew called the FDNY-teledoctor, who overruled the computer dispatch selection and allowed the ambulance crew to send him to Mt. Sinai Brooklyn. Gottlieb said the ordeal wasted precious time.

Asked how he would describe the nearest-hospital-first policy, Gottlieb responded, “Stupid — in a word.”

In rare instances, an appeal to a tele-FDNY doctor can overturn the computer-aided decision.Matthew McDermott

A woman in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, also called 911 to transport her grandmother, who had blood in her stool, to NYU Langone-Brooklyn Hospital, which is in Sunset Park.

The woman, who requested anonymity, said her grandmother is Chinese and that she preferred to send grandma to a hospital with more Chinese-speaking staff.

But the paramedic and EMT in the ambulance said they had to take granny to Coney Island Hospital, which was closer.

The family ended up refusing the medical assistance and drove the grandmother to Langone-Brooklyn.

The new ambulance policy has “created a lot of consternation” in the hospital industry, said Kenneth Raske, CEO of the Greater New York Hospital Association. He said negotiations are ongoing to see if tweaks can be made to the directive.

But FDNY Commissioner Tucker defended the policy during a Post interview, as did the union leader representing paramedics and EMTS on 911 ambulance crews.

Tucker said some hospital officials are not happy that patients are not being steered to their hospitals by the FDNY 911 system.

“That’s a business dispute. I’m in the business of saving lives,” Tucker said.

“I don’t steer patients. I take them for the most part to the local hospital. We’re not the Uber business or Lyft business to take people where they want to go.”

He said transporting patients to the nearest hospital in most instances is “the right thing to do” so that ambulance crews can more quickly respond to the next 911 call.

The previous directive only required ambulance crews to deliver patients to the closest hospital during severe or life-threatening medical emergencies.Getty Images

The average ambulance response time to life-threatening emergencies jumped more than 34 seconds, from 8 minutes and 14 seconds in 2024 fiscal year to 8 minutes and 48 seconds for the first quarter of the 2025 fiscal year running from July 1 through November, according to the mayor’s management report in January.

The FDNY is in discussions with hospital officials over possible tweaks to the policy, but Tucker does not foresee dramatic change.

“It’s working,” he said. “Response times are coming down.”

A patient who is not facing a life-threatening situation can refuse medical assistance and take a private car service or other transport, Tucker noted.

Oren Barzilay, president of FDNY EMS Local 2507 representing FDNY EMS paramedics and EMTS, backed the new 911 directive, repeating many of the points made by Tucker.

He said some patients want to avoid the city’s public hospitals.

“People think we’re a cab service to take them where they want to go. We take you to the local hospital to be treated,” Barzilay said.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/27/us-news/new-fdny-order-sending-patients-to-closest-hospital-provokes-backlash-stupid-in-a-word/

China Seizes Disputed Reef In South China Sea, Next To Key Philippines Military Base

 While the nevertrump world, which includes the entire US mainstream media, and a sizable portion of the US population are rooting for China in the ongoing transpacific trade war, China quietly seized a disputed reef just miles away from the Philippines’ most important military outpost in the South China Sea, in a sharp escalation of a regional dispute with the Philippines, raising the risk of a new military stand-off between the two rival claimants.

According to the FT, the China Coast Guard “implemented maritime control and exercised sovereign jurisdiction” over Sandy Cay this month, the military channel of state broadcaster CCTV reported on Saturday. It released images of four officers, wearing all black and holding the Chinese flag, declaring sovereignty over the reef in the Spratly Islands.

Sandy Cay is near a Philippine military outpost on Thitu Island, which Manila reportedly uses to track Chinese movements in the area.

The move marks the first time in many years that Beijing, which claims the South China Sea almost in its entirety, has officially planted its flag on another previously unoccupied land feature.

It comes as the Philippines and its ally the US are conducting Balikatan, their largest annual military exercise, which will include coastal defense and island seizure drills. They will be held from next week on the Philippine territory closest to the Spratlys.

Although just a sand bank measuring little more than 200 square metres, Sandy Cay has strategic value for China because international law grants it a territorial sea. That 12-nautical-mile radius overlaps with Thitu Island, the South China Sea reef the Philippines uses to track Chinese moves in the area.

Source: Eurasia Review

The Philippine government has yet to formally respond. Both China and the Philippines have staked their claims on various islands and zones. Their dispute has been escalating, with frequent confrontations including vessels colliding and scuffles.

The White House said the reports of China seizing Sandy Cay were “deeply concerning if true”.

“Actions like these threaten regional stability and violate international law,” said James Hewitt, National Security Council spokesperson. “We are consulting closely with our own partners and remain committed to a free and open Indo-Pacific.”  

Beijing’s official declaration of sovereignty over Sandy Cay will raise fears that Beijing intends to build up unoccupied reefs and banks. Over the past two years, Manila has increased coastguard patrols and sent scientific teams to investigate reports of Chinese reclamation activity at Sandy Cay and three other reefs further south.

Some maritime experts argue new Chinese reclamation is unlikely because artificial islands built and militarized by Beijing over the past decade have given its military and coastguard sufficient presence and reach.

There is so far no sign of a permanent Chinese occupation of Sandy Cay or construction on it. A Philippine maritime security official said on Saturday that the Chinese coastguard had left after unfurling the flag.

But the official declaration of sovereignty indicated China could “increase their harassment against us at Pag-Asa”, he added, using the Philippine name for Thitu.  

The Philippine coastguard has been operating a monitoring base on Thitu since late 2023, but Manila is now upgrading a runway and other infrastructure on the island. The building is part of efforts to make its South China Sea reefs more habitable and push back against increasingly aggressive Chinese activity.

Thitu Island

Lyle Morris, a former Pentagon China expert now at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Sandy Cay had been a source of tension for years between China and the Philippines.

“China has established a near constant presence around Sandy Cay for years, mostly using their maritime militia vessels to surround nearby waters,” said Morris. “They have stepped up their presence ever since the Philippines began to fortify Pagasa island [Thitu] and its runway.”

Morris said the Chinese action did not pose a test for the US, saying it was more a “tactical move” targeting the Philippines.

“This puts more pressure on the Philippines to respond in some way,” Morris added. “If China were ever to physically occupy the feature, the Philippines would likely feel compelled to respond. What kind of response is unclear.”

The Chinese move also comes as Washington and Beijing are mired in a deepening trade war. US allies are also watching closely to see how the Trump administration will deal with Chinese actions in the South China Sea.

“The People’s Republic of China has been increasing its pressure on Philippines outposts for years. But it’s notable that this action comes amidst an escalating US-China trade war and is exactly the sort of action that is hard for the US to respond to, while spooking its Philippines ally,” said Mira Rapp-Hooper, former National Security Council senior director for east Asia in the Biden administration.

China’s law gives its coastguard a mandate to board and inspect foreign vessels “intruding” into waters claimed by Beijing and detain their crews. That raises the risk of clashes with Philippine military and coastguard at Thitu, in waters China now treats as its territorial sea.

China’s military assets are far stronger than the Thitu outpost. Its installations on nearby Subi Reef include surface-to-air missiles, hangars, a runway, radar and a deepwater shelter port. But because it is categorized only as a low tide elevation, Subi lacks a territorial sea under international law.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/china-seizes-disputed-reef-south-china-sea-next-key-philippines-military-base

NY Times Downplays Pilot Error In Deadly DC Crash To Push Preferred Narrative

 by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

Once again, the failing New York Times is running interference and burying the real story to protect their preferred narrative. 

An article headlined "Missteps, Equipment Problems and a Common but Risky Practice Led to a Fatal Crash," which is about January's devastating crash at Reagan National Airport, is a textbook example of mainstream media malpractice.

An honest headline would have read, "Helicopter Pilot Ignored Multiple Safety Warnings Before Fatal Crash."

The liberal paper of record spent roughly a thousand words dancing around the obvious truth: a helicopter pilot directly caused this tragedy by ignoring multiple explicit warnings.

But that wouldn't fit their preferred story about "systemic failures," would it?

Let me spell out what the Times buried deep in their article: The Black Hawk pilot received clear, explicit warnings about altitude from their co-pilot. 

The co-pilot explicitly instructed them to turn away from the passenger jet. And what did they do? They ignored those warnings and flew straight into the path of an American Airlines flight carrying 64 innocent people.

The Black Hawk was 15 seconds away from crossing paths with the jet. Warrant Officer Eaves then turned his attention to Captain Lobach.

He told her he believed that air traffic control wanted them to turn left, toward the east river bank.

Turning left would have opened up more space between the helicopter and Flight 5342, which was heading for Runway 33 at an altitude of roughly 300 feet.

She did not turn left.

But instead of leading with these crucial facts, the Times gives us a meandering story about "visual separation procedures" and "aviation practices." Classic mainstream media sleight-of-hand — when the facts don't fit your preferred narrative, bury them under a mountain of context and systemic analysis.

Here's what the Times doesn't want you to focus on: This wasn't some complex system failure that Democrats can use to blame the Trump administration for.

This wasn't about equipment problems or procedural issues. 

This was about a pilot who ignored basic safety protocols and clear warnings from their co-pilot. Full stop.

As we know, the liberal media and the Democratic Party immediately sought to blame the Trump administration for the crash, claiming that FAA cuts created the environment for the crash to happen. 

The Army Black Hawk was flying well above its approved altitude. 

The co-pilot knew it. 

Air traffic control knew it. 

The families of the 64 people who lost their lives in this entirely preventable tragedy deserve better than the Times' narrative manipulation. 

They deserve the truth, plainly stated: Their loved ones died because a pilot ignored multiple explicit warnings and violated basic safety protocols. 

They don’t want us focusing on the pilot because then some uncomfortable questions have to be asked.

Remember this the next time the mainstream media tries to lecture us about "speaking truth to power" or "holding people accountable." Their idea of accountability apparently depends entirely on whether the truth fits their preferred narrative.

In the meantime, I'll keep doing their job for them -- telling the truths they won't tell, and calling out their propaganda for what it is.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ny-times-downplays-pilot-error-deadly-dc-crash-push-preferred-narrative