Search This Blog

Monday, September 8, 2025

Mumbling Mamdani serves word salad to pressing NYC issues in recent spate of interviews

 He’s mumbling Mamdani.

Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani dodged straightforward questions Monday on pressing issues facing the Big Apple — capping off days of mealy-mouthed politician speak that insiders argued showed the charismatic candidate’s shine is wearing off.

The frontrunner in the mayoral election only had gobbledygook to offer on a range of topics during the public safety forum at Columbia Journalism School, even when simply asked if he supported school safety agents working in the city’s public schools.

Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaking at a Public Safety Forum at Columbia University on Sept. 8, 2025.Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

“I think it is an indication of this broken status quo that we have many schools where they will have a school safety agent, but they will not have a nurse or a social worker… and I’ve been critical of that approach to our school system,” he droned to moderator Errol Louis.

The forum — hosted by the journalism school and the news outlet Vital City — came after a spate of weekend media interviews in which Mamdani gave similar non-responses.

The substance-free streak shows Mamdani is struggling to transition from the Democratic primary’s upset challenger to the responsibilities of being the top City Hall contender, political observers and consultants said.

“He is about to find out charisma and charm are not answers,” said one longtime political operative. 

“Tough choices have to be made and as the young, inexperienced frontrunner – he doesn’t want to make them. It’s understandable, but not necessarily acceptable.”

Mamdani refused to commit to supporting school safety agents in public schools.Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

Mamdani’s increasing taste for word salad showed itself Friday, when he was asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip whether he would request for the National Guard to be put on the subways in response to President Trump potentially sending federal agents to the Big Apple.

“We have a responsibility to address the struggles that New Yorkers are living through. And one thing I’ll say about Donald Trump is he often diagnoses actual despair that people are living through,” he said, notably not responding to the question.

The candidate who once unhesitatingly said billionaires shouldn’t exist also dodged Phillip’s question on whether he thought the same about trillionaires — and bizarrely tried to shift the focus.

“I think the better question is whether working people should exist, because what we’re seeing right now is amidst this incredible wealth, we have people who are keeping the city running that have to now live outside of the city, outside of the state,” he said.

The firebrand progressive’s ramblings continued Sunday during an interview on CBS2 New York’s “The Point with Marcia Kramer.”

Asked about past stances, including calling to defund the police, that he’s been increasingly shedding, Mamdani replied: “Yes, those are out of step with the campaign that we are running and it’s been clear throughout.”

He also decided to point the finger at independent mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo.

“It’s chiefly Andrew Cuomo – who would prefer to debate a mythical version of myself than the person who I actually am. They would prefer to focus on tweets from 2020 as opposed to the platform in 2025,” he told Kramer.

Mamdani also failed to answer a direct question in the interview about what he would cut from his $10 billion freebie-filled agenda.

Mamdani speaking to students and faculty after the forum.Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

“I think this is why it’s so critical to increase revenue on the most profitable corporations in New York City by having the same top tax rate as New Jersey,” he said – even as Gov. Kathy Hochul has publicly poured cold water on tax increases coming from Albany.

Ken Frydman, a Democratic political operative, said Mamdani has had three months since becoming the Democratic nominee to come up with concrete plans for proposals — such as his $1 billion Department of Community Safety, which he envisions taking over mental health calls from the NYPD.

“But Mamdani has no plans for making any of his socialist policy initiatives a reality,” Frydman said. “They’re sweet nothings to the yearning, young masses.”

Mamdani during Monday’s public safety forum also failed to directly answer Louis’ question about how protesters blocking traffic or bridges should be dealt with.

He opted instead to criticize the NYPD’s Strategic Response Group – which he has called to disband if elected.

“I think we have a proud history of exercising the First Amendment in the city, and it’s one that should be protected. I think much of this conversation around protest has also been a question of which police would respond to that protest,” he said.

Political insiders told The Post that Mamdani’s lack of straight answers may be a sign his popularity is running out with voters.Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who attended the forum, was troubled by Mamdani’s answers.

“If you tolerate civil disobedience, you’re going to have chaos in the city,” Gelinas said.

Another Dem operative said Mamdani — who electrified voters with his lofty promises — is “coming back down to earth.”

“A mayor cannot run the city on rhetoric,” the operative said.

“Looks like he’s ready to become the next mayor– he is already dodging questions and has developed an allergy to furnishing detailed plans just like Mayor [Eric] Adams.”

In a phone interview with The Post, Cuomo shot back at the socialist pol, slamming him as a hypocrite.

Mamdani’s online footprint contains multiple examples of anti-police rhetoric, from calling the NYPD “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety” to explicitly endorsing the “defund the police movement” or saying that New York’s Finest shouldn’t respond to domestic violence calls.

“He is a mythical creation – just a series of tweets and TikToks. He doesn’t exist except on social media,” the former governor said.

“If I couldn’t believe what you said before, why would I believe what you say now?” Cuomo questioned, adding that Mamdani’s rhetoric on policing issues has been “ugly and bizarre.

Mamdani’s spokeswoman Dora Pekec focused on Cuomo, arguing the former governor spent his entire primary campaign “in hiding” — and continued to do so by skipping the public safety forum.

“Meanwhile, Zohran has always and will continue to sit down with anyone to explain his vision for a more vibrant New York City where everyone can feel safe and afford to live,” she said.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/08/us-news/mumbling-zohran-mamdani-serves-up-word-salad-instead-of-straight-answers-to-pressing-nyc-issues-in-recent-spate-of-interviews/

AI Has Come To Reshape Education

 by Lika Kobeshavidze via the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE),

In the last few years, everything has changed for college students. Applications capable of writing assignments suddenly became a part of everyday life.

What is the real impact of artificial intelligence (AI)? Is it a convenient tool for personalized learning or a path to academic dishonesty?

Out of nowhere, AI became students’ best friend.

A tool created in 2022 is now a daily habit. Professors may see dishonesty, but students see efficiency. Is AI additional help or a shortcut to avoid learning?

The real problem is a decline in educational standards. Will over-reliance on AI make students smarter, or does it come with darker consequences?

According to a new study by scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the latter might be true.

Researchers found that writing essays with ChatGPT can lead to “cognitive debt” and a “gradual decline in the quality of written assessments.”

Over four months, MIT researchers asked 54 adults to write essays in three groups: those who used ChatGPT, those who used a search engine, and those who used only their own skills. The team tracked brain activity and analyzed the writing to see how engaged participants were. The results were interesting: those who relied on AI showed much less brain engagement and even struggled to remember their own quotes. When later asked to write without AI, they performed the worst of all.

The study was small, with only 18 participants making the final round, but it raises a big question: Does over-reliance on AI make it harder to think for ourselves?

Artificial intelligence is still a relatively new tool. But its rise has created major challenges for academic integrity. This skepticism is not new; people had similar concerns when digital calculators emerged. They were also seen as “easy fixes.” But, in the 1970s, exams were redesigned to match a new reality; instead of calculating by hand, students were expected to use calculators and solve complex problems.

The real challenge is that the institutions haven’t updated their standards or don’t even know how. Teachers still assign the same tasks and expect the same outcomes as five years ago, ignoring the fact that a powerful new tool now exists.

It is essential that current and future generations can think critically and creatively and solve problems. However, AI reshapes what this means. Writing essays by hand is no longer the only way to demonstrate critical thinking, just as long division doesn’t automatically prove numerical skills.

Already, 89 percent of US college students admit to using ChatGPT for homework, despite its limitations. Adaptation is urgent. Some universities, like Stanford, Barnard, and New York University, have begun offering AI literacy courses, where students learn to evaluate the consequences of AI and understand when not to use it.

Europe is taking a slightly different path. The European Commission’s guidelines emphasize transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI education. Instead of banning the tool, they are trying to integrate it into the learning process. Students may use AI to brainstorm ideas, correct grammar, or support research. The goal is for students to understand how it works, its risks, and capabilities.

Asia, however, is the leader of integration. In South Korea and Singapore, students use AI in classrooms and in assessments. Singapore, through its second National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (NAIS 2.0), has positioned itself as a global leader. The plan outlines 15 steps over the next 3–5 years to advance AI in manufacturing, finance, healthcare, education, and public services.

AI is a huge part of today’s world. No matter how much universities or schools wish it never existed, it seems like it’s here to stay.

Just as calculators handle our calculations, AI can support learning.

But the real problem is not reliance on AI, but misuse.

Pretending that this technology doesn’t exist or banning it weakens education.

This is not 1955; not all the students write exams by hand. They need to be challenged and taught how to use AI responsibly and ethically.

In fact, mastering AI should be part of academic success.

Ignoring it leaves students unskilled, unprepared, and ultimately less competitive.

https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/ai-has-come-reshape-education

FDA greenlights trial for pig kidney transplant

 Mass General Brigham, based in Somerville, Mass., and eGenesis have received FDA approval for a clinical trial testing genetically engineered pig kidneys. 

The trial will evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of EGEN-2784, a genetically engineered pig kidney, after 24 weeks post-procedure, according to a Sept. 8 news release from eGenesis. Study participants will be patients who have end stage kidney disease, are 50 or older, are dependent on dialysis and are on the kidney transplant waitlist. 

Cambridge, Mass.-based eGenesis is a biotech company that researches and develops human-compatible engineered organs. EGEN-2784 is the company’s lead candidate for kidney transplantation, according to the release. 

The trial currently includes three patients. The first patient, a 67-year-old man, has surpassed seven months after the transplant, making him the world’s longest-living recipient of a genetically engineered pig kidney. He continues to live dialysis-free, according to the release.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/patient-safety-outcomes/fda-greenlights-trial-for-pig-kidney-transplant/

Hospital group urges federal probe of drugmakers’ 340B rebate models

 The American Hospital Association is calling on federal regulators to launch an antitrust investigation into its claims of drug manufacturers’ actions regarding 340B rebate models. 

In a letter sent to the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, the AHA accused several pharmaceutical giants of undermining the 340B drug pricing program through behavior the association said may violate federal competition laws. 

Here are five notes: 

  1. The AHA argued that major drugmakers, including Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb, have imposed new rebate models that restrict access to 340B drug discounts.

  2. Under the rebate model, 340B eligible hospitals must pay full price upfront for medications and wait for rebates, a reversal of the program’s initial, upfront discount structure, the letter said. AHA warned the models would result in forcing financially strained safety-net providers to issue interest free loans to wealthy pharmaceutical companies.

  3. The letter also outlined a timeline of events when drug companies began announcing rebate models in rapid succession, starting with Johnson & Johnson in August 2024 and other drugmakers following suit shortly thereafter. AHA argued the timing showed a “parallel conduct,” raising concerns under antitrust law.

  4. As a result, the AHA urged the FTC and the Justice Department to launch a formal investigation into what it called a “potential antitrust conspiracy” which could threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals serving low-income and rural communities.

  5. Most recently, the Health Resources and Services Administration launched a rebate model pilot program in August, offering manufacturers the opportunity to propose alternative discounts. In response, hospital groups, including AHA, America’s Essential Hospitals, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and others issued an Aug. 8 letter voicing concerns about the speed and scope of the rollout, urging the agency to extend key deadlines. 

    The American Medical Group Association also recently opposed the 340B rebate model , saying it would undermine the initial program’s intent and jeopardize access to care for millions of vulnerable patients. 

    “Safety-net providers operate on razor-thin margins. The rebate pilot would destabilize these institutions, directly threatening access to affordable medications for patients,” Jerry Penso, MD, president and CEO of AMGA stated in a Sept. 8 letter. “HHS should withdraw the proposal and strengthen the existing upfront discount model that has successfully supported providers and patients for decades.”

US agency launches process to bar some Chinese labs from testing US electronics

 The Federal Communications Commission on Monday said it has begun proceedings to withdraw recognition from seven test labs owned or controlled by the Chinese government, citing U.S. national security concerns.

The U.S. telecom agency in May voted to finalize rules barring Chinese labs deemed risks to U.S. national security from testing electronic devices such as smartphones, cameras and computers for use in the United States.

The FCC also said on Monday that U.S. recognition of four other Chinese labs has expired since May and will not be renewed, including two that sought extensions.

"Foreign adversary governments should not own and control the labs that test the devices the FCC certifies as safe for the U.S. market," FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said.

All electronics used in the United States must go through the FCC's equipment authorization process before they can be imported. The FCC says about 75% of all electronics are tested in labs located inside China.

The FCC said it was taking action against companies including the Chongqing Academy of Information and Communications; CQC Internet of Vehicles Technical Service Co; CVC Testing; TUV Rheinland-CCIC Ningbo Co; UL-CCIC;

CESI (Guangzhou) Standards; China Academy of Information and Communications Technology; Shanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology and CCIC Southern Testing Co.

The test labs could not immediately be reached.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately comment Monday but said earlier it opposes the United States "over-stretching the concept of national security, using national apparatus and long-arm jurisdiction to bring down Chinese companies. We oppose turning trade and technological issues into political weapons."

The FCC previously found many labs appeared to have deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party, including some connected to Chinese state-owned-enterprises or the Chinese military. These labs have tested thousands of devices bound for the U.S. market over the last several years, the agency added.

The FCC in November 2022 banned approvals of new telecommunications equipment from Huawei and ZTE, as well as telecom and video surveillance equipment from Hytera Communications Corp, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology and Zhejiang Dahua Technology.

In March this year, the FCC said it was investigating nine Chinese companies, including Huawei, Hikvision, China Mobile and China Telecom to determine if they were seeking to evade U.S. restrictions.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/us-agency-launches-process-bar-235110306.html

'Major jobs revision Tuesday could show the labor market is weaker than previously thought'

 The latest jobs report points to a labor market that's faltering, but the slowdown may have begun much earlier. Economists expect the Bureau of Labor Statistics tomorrow to issue a major downward revision, showing the nation added hundreds of thousands fewer jobs than first reported.

On Sept. 9, the BLS will release its preliminary benchmark revision to labor market data, which aims to better account for businesses that have opened or closed. Economists say the revision, covering the 12-month period through March 2025, could show that hiring during that time was about 800,000 jobs lower than previously reported. 

The report could draw attention from the Trump administration, as the president last month questioned the validity of the monthly jobs report — and fired the commissioner of the BLS — after the data included a significant downward revision. Hiring experts and economists point to a job market that's stalling out as some businesses are bearing increased tariff costs while others are tapping artificial intelligence as a way to lower labor costs and replace workers.

"The labor market will likely look even worse after the release of the preliminary benchmark revision to payrolls on Sept. 9," Bill Adams, chief economist for Comerica Bank, noted in an email. 

The revision could show that employment was reduced by about 775,000 for the 12 months through March, Adams estimated. That would indicate that the average monthly job growth in 2024 actually stood at 100,000 per month, down from the 165,000 previously reported, he added. 

The revision would cover only the first three months of Mr. Trump's second administration, with the bulk of the timeframe occurring in the last year of former President Biden's administration.

Job growth has slowed dramatically in recent months, with the employers adding an average of 29,000 jobs each month from June through August, the most recent BLS data shows. 

Why does the government revise its jobs data?

Jobs revisions occur each month, with the BLS updating its data to reflect more recent information it has received from businesses about the pace of hiring. That's because some companies respond late to the BLS' surveys, which means the agency receives an influx of new information after it has issued its initial monthly jobs report, prompting the fresh numbers. 

But once a year, the BLS also issues an annual revision based on fresh data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), which tracks employment and wages reported by employers that cover more than 95% of U.S. jobs.

While the monthly jobs report relies on about 50,000 responses for each period, the QCEW covers 11 million workplaces — but that scope requires more time for collecting the data versus the BLS' monthly report, Adams of Comerica said. 

"The QCEW's detail lets it directly measure jobs added at newly-opened workplaces and lost at closing ones, which account for several millions of employment churn each year," he added. 

What happened in the last annual revision?

The BLS issued a major downward revision last year for the same annual data, showing that employers added 818,000 fewer jobs in the 12 months ended March 2024 than previously estimated. That lowered average monthly job growth for the period to 174,000, down from the initial estimate of 242,000.

At the time, the downward revision was seen as evidence that the labor market was showing cracks, and it was viewed as paving the way for the Federal Reserve to cut rates at its September 2024 meeting.

What does this mean for a Fed rate cut?

The Fed will be focused on analyzing recent economic data, such as the latest jobs report and the next Consumer Price Index, which will be issued on Sept. 11. Economists expect the CPI to show an annualized increase of 2.9% in August, higher than the prior month's 2.7% and well above the Fed's goal of reaching a 2% annual rate.

With the labor market hitting a wall in recent months, economists now expect the Federal Reserve to cut its benchmark rate at its Sept. 17 meeting. The only question is whether the Fed might usher in a jumbo cut of 0.5 percentage points, or opt for the typical cut of 0.25 percentage points. 

"Market odds currently see a 100% chance of a Fed rate cut this month, with a small constituent seeing an outsized 50-basis-point cut on Sept. 17 within the realm of possibility," Anthony Saglimbene, Ameriprise chief market strategist, wrote in a Sept. 8 research note. 

But, he added, if the August's Consumer Price Index comes in hotter than expected on Sept. 11, that "would likely throw cold water on the idea that the Fed is considering an outsized September rate cut."

President Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Powell this year over the Fed's decision to keep interest rates level. In June, Mr. Trump publicly mused over whether to fire him, although many legal experts say it's not clear he has the constitutional authority to do so. Powell's term as Fed chair ends on May 15, 2026.

Trump nominates replacement commissioner

President Trump in August announced E.J. Antoni as his nominee to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Monday. Antoni, a fellow at conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, has criticized the BLS, questioning its methodology.

"DOGE needs to take a chainsaw to the BLS...," he wrote in a November post on X.

In a statement Monday backing the BLS, the National Association for Business Economics (NABE), a professional association of global economists, applied economists, data scientists and academics, said it "stands firmly with the dedicated economists and statisticians at BLS and across the federal statistical agencies." 

The association went on to urge policymakers and others in the business and economics community "to defend the integrity of the U.S. statistical system and ensure it remains the global gold standard," it said.

"The Bureau of Labor Statistics needs a knowledgeable and qualified commissioner who will uphold the agency's mission and protect its trusted professional staff from political pressure. A commissioner with deep expertise and independence is essential to maintaining public trust, ensuring impartial analysis, and safeguarding the credibility of U.S. statistics," NABE added.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/jobs-report-revision-september-9-bls-economy-trump/

AI Adoption Momentum Slows As Hardware Investment Accelerates

 As the third anniversary of ChatGPT's launch quickly approaches, Nvidia's market value has surged more than tenfold, leaving institutional investors pondering whether the AI data-center buildout nationwide is merely hype or if there is actually substance.

Hyperscalers have poured hundreds of billions of dollars into AI infrastructure, capital expenditures that will soon need to demonstrate clear returns; failure to do so risks undermining the lofty valuations for the so-called Magnificent Seven stocks.

On Monday, Goldman chief economist Jan Hatzius published a note with new insights into the bank's quarterly AI adoption tracker through September. The report indicates that while AI investment continues to accelerate, adoption rates at large firms are starting to slow down. 

Hatzius said the AI adoption growth rate slowed to 9.7% of U.S. firms using AI in the third quarter, up from 9.2% in the second. 

Finance and real estate had some of the largest gains, while educational services reported a decline. Meanwhile, broadcasting and publishing are expected to experience the fastest adoption over the next six months. 

Labor market effects are still muted, according to Goldman's chief economist. He noted that job displacement is emerging across tech, design, and customer service. AI roles made up 28% of IT job postings, while AI was cited in layoffs affecting 10,375 workers since the previous update. Goldman expects that full AI adoption across corporate America could displace 6% to 7% of all workers. 

More charts from Hatzius' note: 


https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/ai-adoption-momentum-slows-hardware-investment-accelerates