Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Qatar calls for retaliation against Israel ‘from the whole region’ after strike on Hamas leaders

 Qatar’s prime minister vowed to retaliate against Israel over its airstrike on Hamas’ political leaders in Doha, calling it a “decisive moment” in the Middle East.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani slammed Tuesday’s strike on the Qatari capital as “state terrorism” sanctioned by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Doha claiming such an attack needed a strong response from the entire region.

“The State of Qatar is committed to act in a decisive way with anything that would target its territories and will reserve the right to retaliate and will take all the needed measures to retaliate,” al-Thani told reporters Tuesday night, per Al Jazeera translators.

Qatari Prime Ministet Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani called for reatliation “from the whole region” over Israel’s airstrike on Hamas targets in Doha.Photo by KARIM JAAFAR/AFP via Getty Images
A building damaged by the Israeli strike in Doha on Sept. 9, 2025.REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

“I think that we have reached a decisive moment. There should be retaliation from the whole region in the face of those barbaric actions,” he added.

Israel escalated the war against Hamas on Tuesday after launching an airstrike aimed at killing its political leaders, who had convened in Doha to discuss the current cease-fire deal with Qatari mediators.

Hamas has said the attack killed five members, but claimed none of its leaders were assassinated, including head negotiator and top Gaza official Khalil al-Hayya.

A Qatari security officer who was guarding the offices where Hamas officials gathered was also killed in the blast, Doha said. 

Al-Thani claimed the attack on Doha has undermined Qatar’s role as one of the key mediators trying to secure a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, accusing Netanyahu of being the key source of instability in the Middle East.

Smoke rising from a building in Doha after the strike.AFPTV/AFP via Getty Images

“It reflects the barbarism of this person that is leading the region, unfortunately, to a point where we cannot address any situation, and we cannot repair anything, and we cannot work within the frameworks of international laws,” the prime minister said.

“He just violates all those international laws,” he added.  

The situation has caused headaches for President Trump, who apologized to al-Thani for the attack and vowed to make sure such a thing would never happen again.

Al-Thani accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of being the source of instability in the Middle East.Ronen Zvulun/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock

Qatar serves as a key US ally in the Middle East, with Doha housing America’s largest military air base in the region.

Despite Israeli leadership’s assurance that the attack on Doha would progress the peace talks with Hamas to free the remaining hostages in Gaza, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said bombing Qatar “does not advance Israel or America’s goals.”

The White House, however, noted that Israel has a right to target Hamas’ leadership.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/10/world-news/qatar-vows-retaliation-against-israel-after-strike-on-hamas-leaders/

Soleno Therapeutics Says Patient Death Unrelated to VYKAT XR Treatment

 Soleno Therapeutics has addressed a report in the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System concerning the death of a 17-year-old patient, which was determined not to be related to their treatment with VYKAT XR. The company emphasizes that VYKAT XR has a proven safety profile and that adverse events will be reported in compliance with legal requirements, while highlighting the complexities of Prader Willi Syndrome, which can lead to various health complications.

https://www.tipranks.com/news/company-announcements/soleno-therapeutics-addresses-fda-adverse-event-report

Merck to scrap London drug research centre

  Merck said on Wednesday it was scrapping research operations in London, citing the UK's challenging business environment, and would relocate the research activity to existing sites primarily in the United States.

The U.S. drugmaker no longer plans to occupy the Belgrove House site at King's Cross, which was due to open in 2027. The move will impact about 125 staff members.

Pharmaceutical companies have been shoring up investments in the U.S. amid the Trump administration's tariff threats and pressure to move more manufacturing to the U.S.

Merck said its decision "reflects the challenges of the UK not making meaningful progress towards addressing the lack of investment in the life science industry and the overall undervaluation of innovative medicines and vaccines by successive UK governments."

The company intends to also vacate laboratories occupied at the London Bioscience Innovation Centre and the Francis Crick Institute by the end of 2025.

Merck earlier this year announced a series of major U.S. investments, including a $1-billion facility in Delaware to produce biologics and its blockbuster cancer drug Keytruda, which is expected to create over 4,500 jobs.

The plant is slated to be operational by 2028, with experimental drug production starting by 2030.

Merck also opened a $1-billion facility at its North Carolina site in March.

The company's animal health unit will also invest $895 million to expand its Kansas manufacturing and R&D site, part of a broader $9 billion U.S. investment through 2028.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/merck-scrap-london-drug-research-161437164.html

HHS, FDA bring major DTC advertising policy changes

 With the much-anticipated release today of the Make America Healthy Again report and strategy document, the US Department of Health and Human Services under Robert F Kennedy Jr also announced a new policy change that would require pharma companies to list drug information much more extensively in broadcast advertisements.

"Pharmaceutical ads hooked this country on prescription drugs," Kennedy said in a statement. "We will shut down that pipeline of deception and require drug companies to disclose all critical safety facts in their advertising. Only radical transparency will break the cycle of overmedicalisation that drives America's chronic disease epidemic."

The new push for DTC advertising reform builds on a section of the MAHA report titled “The Overmedicalisation of Our Kids”, which alleges that Americans, especially children, are overprescribed medications including ADHD medicines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antibiotics, and even asthma inhalers. The section also calls into question the safety and necessity of many childhood vaccines.

Reverting policy, closing loopholes, and stepping up enforcement

Specifically, the FDA is initiating a rulemaking process to rescind changes it made in 1997 that allowed pharma companies to limit the aired disclaimer to a “major risk statement” and direct consumers to a website, toll-free number, or printed insert for more information.

“The FDA has historically stipulated that a manufacturer, packer, or distributor must provide the public with materially complete information that fairly balances both the benefits and the risks of the drug,” President Donald Trump wrote in a memorandum timed with the announcement. “Over time, however, the FDA’s requirements have permitted drug companies to include less information, particularly in broadcast advertising, and drug manufacturer advertising has skyrocketed in recent decades. My Administration will ensure that the current regulatory framework for drug advertising results in fair, balanced, and complete information for American consumers.”

The agency also announced that it would begin “aggressive enforcement” of DTC advertising violations and close “digital loopholes” by expanding oversight into social media ads, AI-generated health content and chatbot interactions, influencer partnerships, and sponsored content.

Aggressive enforcement will involve sending letters to thousands of pharma companies “warning them that the Agency is no longer asleep at the wheel” and issuing dozens of enforcement letters related to false or misleading advertising.

A soft ban on DTC?

By introducing more onerous requirements without attempting an outright ban on DTC advertising, HHS seems to be attempting to sidestep an inevitable first amendment argument from pharma.

“The action simply returns to the status quo policy pre-1997,” the FDA wrote in its fact sheet about the change. “It requires the presentation of factual and uncontroversial statements, which are already legally required to be communicated in drug advertising; goes directly to the core government interests of protecting the public from deception and protecting public health - as supported by voluminous evidence of public harm under the current system; and does not unduly burden advertisers, by preserving their right to engage in commercial speech under the standards that existed prior to 1997.”

Jim Potter, the executive director for the Coalition for Healthcare Communication, is cautiously optimistic about today's announcement.

"Misleading DTC Rx advertising is the cornerstone of FDA law and regulations, which the healthcare marketing industry wholly supports," he told pharmaphorum in an email. "And it is a far cry from the clearly unconstitutional threats and proposals to ban all DTC and HCP prescription drug marketing in the United States."

Potter added that, if FDA actions violate the Administrative Procedures Act, many in the industry are likely to sue.

"However, if it advances helping provide balanced information to consumers and caregivers within the 'clear, conspicuous, and neutral' (CCN) ruling issued in 2023, then we can look forward to working with the FDA," he wrote. "Ultimately, our mutual goal is to help patients be better informed and better engage with their healthcare providers in joint decision-making for improved health outcomes. "

Responding to the MAHA report broadly, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) questioned the premise of the government’s action.

“The idea that children are broadly overprescribed mental health medications is misleading; in fact, because of poor reimbursement for mental health providers and restrictions by health plans, many patients with mental illness often do not receive professional help for their symptoms and remain undiagnosed and untreated,” the Association wrote.

“DTC advertising provides patients with important fact-based, useful, and accessible information about potential treatment options,” they added. “PhRMA’s member companies are committed to responsible, accurate advertising that helps Americans make informed decisions about their healthcare in consultation with their doctor.”

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/hhs-fda-drop-major-dtc-advertising-policy-changes

Brookfield Says It Lined Up Backers for New AI Strategy

 


Mark Carney-linked Brookfield Asset Management said it has already secured investors and deals for its new artificial intelligence infrastructure strategy, as it positions itself to gain from what it sees as a multitrillion-dollar opportunity.

“The biggest opportunity is the role that private capital can play in funding the significant buildout of AI infrastructure in this country and around the world,” President Connor Teskey said in an interview with Bloomberg TV on the sidelines of the firm’s investor day Wednesday.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-10/brookfield-says-it-already-lined-up-backers-for-new-ai-strategy

"Shock To Global Seaborne Gas Trade": China-Russia Pipeline Seen Displacing One-Third Of LNG Imports

 By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com

China’s planned Power of Siberia 2 pipeline with Russia could displace the equivalent of one-third of the country’s LNG imports and deliver a “shock” to the global seaborne gas trade, according to analysts cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

The 50-billion-cubic-meter-per-year conduit, slated to run through Mongolia, would lock in long-term Russian pipeline supply and sharply cut China’s need for LNG cargoes just as global exporters scale up capacity.

The warning follows Sunday’s signing of a binding memorandum between Moscow and Beijing. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Gazprom chief Alexei Miller presented the deal in Beijing as a centerpiece of their energy partnership.

While intent has been formalized, key commercial details such as pricing and financing remain unsettled, with analysts describing the accord as a demonstration of strategic alignment between the two nations, underscoring Russia’s eastward pivot after Europe halted most pipeline purchases.

Chinese media continue to emphasize the sheer scale of the shift. Sina Finance reported Gazprom’s plans to expand existing Power of Siberia flows from 38 to 44 bcm annually, and Far East volumes from 10 to 12 bcm, alongside the new Mongolian line. QQ.com highlighted Beijing’s view of the project as insurance against volatile LNG markets and leverage in negotiations with U.S. and Qatari suppliers.

The initiative is part of a “new gas world order,” with pipeline deals reinforcing China’s long-term bargaining power in energy.

Analysts from Barron’s and Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy have warned that U.S. LNG exporters could lose market share in Asia if China secures more Russian volumes, with the pipeline reducing spot demand and softening growth trajectories for American cargoes.

If Power of Siberia 2 is built on schedule, it would provide China with fixed-price, long-distance pipeline gas at volumes comparable to major LNG supply deals.

That shift could cap demand growth for new liquefaction projects targeting Asia, forcing U.S., Qatari, and Australian exporters to compete more aggressively for the remaining market.

Traders told Bloomberg that such a rebalancing would ripple through long-term contract negotiations now underway, reshaping LNG investment decisions well into the 2030s.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/shock-global-seaborne-gas-trade-china-russia-pipeline-seen-displacing-one-third-lng-imports

Trump Ready To Hit China, India With 100% Tariffs To Pressure Putin, But Only If Europe Joins

 In a curious reverse twist on a global trade war theme, President Trump told European officials he would impose draconian and sweeping new tariffs on India and China to push President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table with Ukraine, but on one condiciont - EU nations do so as well.

Trump made the ask when he called into a meeting with senior US and EU officials in Washington, Bloomberg and FT reported citing people. The US is willing to mirror tariffs imposed by Europe on either country, one of the people said.

The proposal, which will never be accepted, amounts to a very public dare for Europe and is meant to show who really is the bad guy in the public perception war, given that several nations - including Hungary - have blocked more stringent EU sanctions targeting Russia’s energy sector in the past. Such measures would require the backing of all member states. 

Other potential measures discussed by US and EU officials include further sanctions on Russia’s shadow fleet of oil tankers as well as restrictions on its banks, financial sector and major oil companies, according to the people. Trump’s suggestion, first reported by the Financial Times, comes after his deadline for Putin to hold a bilateral meeting with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskiy passed without indication that the Russian leader - who is now advancing rapidly deep inside Ukraine territory and may be knocking on Kiyv's door soon - has any interest in engaging in face-to-face peace talks. Instead, Moscow has stepped up its Ukraine bombing campaign, with a strike Tuesday killing at least two dozen pensioners as they collected payments in eastern Ukraine.

According to Bloomberg, any US action would ultimately depend on Trump, who has so far refrained from punishing Russia directly despite skating through several self-imposed deadlines and Putin’s continued reluctance to negotiate an end to the war. Trump has, however, already doubled tariffs on India to 50% over its continued purchase of Russian oil. He has so far refused to punish China for doing as much energy trade with Russia as India. 

Later Tuesday, Trump wrote a social media post that the US and India were continuing negotiations to address their trade barriers, and expressed optimism the two would reach an agreement to resolve their dispute. He also said he looked forward to “speaking with my good friend” Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the coming weeks.

Trump’s tariff proposal contrasts with a softer tone he has taken in recent months on China as part of apparent efforts to secure a summit with President Xi Jinping and a trade deal with the world’s second-largest economy. Last month, he extended a pause on higher tariffs on Chinese goods into early November, a move that stabilized trade ties.

And yet, offering a token olive branch has done nothing to alienate Russia and China, which last week swore loyalty to each other during the 80 year anniversary of World War II. Signaling Xi’s defiance against attempts at isolating Putin, Russia last week announced China had signed an agreement on the Power of Siberia 2, a vast energy pipeline that Beijing had sought to delay for years. That came after photos of Xi, Putin and Modi smiling and holding hands at a summit in Tianjin were beamed around the world.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said his country had always adhered to an “objective and fair stance” on the war in Ukraine, when asked at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Wednesday about Trump’s latest tariff proposal. 

“China is not the creator of this crisis, nor is it a party involved,” he said. “We firmly oppose using China to make excuses and exerting so-called economic pressure.”

Xi would retaliate against any escalation. Chinese exports have shown resilience despite a 55% levy on shipments to the US, indicating Beijing has room to withstand more pain. For Trump, returning to tit-for-tat moves risks destabilizing China’s supply of magnets that are critical to American manufacturing of everything from mobile phones to missiles.  Such a scenario could also jeopardize a meeting between Trump and China’s top leader that both nations are working to arrange, and could take place as soon as next month on the sidelines of a major summit in South Korea. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/trump-ready-hit-china-india-100-tariffs-pressure-putin-only-if-europe-joins