Search This Blog

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

'Hamas calls on Trump not to let Israel 'delay' peace deal'

 Hamas urged United States President Donald Trump and mediators to ensure Israel honors the terms of the newly agreed-upon Gaza peace deal and not let it go back on or "delay" its implementation.

The group said it accepted the proposal "with the aim of reaching an end to the war of extermination against our Palestinian people and the occupation's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip."

"We highly appreciate the efforts of our brothers the mediators in Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey and we also value the efforts of US President Donald Trump," Hamas noted.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Hamas-calls-on-Trump-not-to-let-Israel-'delay'-peace-deal/64949336

Netanyahu: Govt to meet Thursday to approve Gaza deal

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the country's government will meet on Thursday to approve the first phase of the agreement with Hamas that will end the Gaza war and secure the release of the hostages.

"A great day for Israel. Tomorrow I will convene the government to approve the agreement and bring all our dear hostages home," the statement from the Israeli prime minister's office said. He thanked the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) as well as United States President Donald Trump and his administration for "their dedication to this sacred mission of freeing our hostages."

Earlier, Trump announced that Israel and Hamas had agreed to the first stage of the peace plan for Gaza, stating that "All parties will be treated fairly."

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Netanyahu:-Govt-to-meet-Thursday-to-approve-Gaza-deal/64949345

Largest ‘gun safety’ group proudly backed Jay Jones, hasn’t yet walked back support after text message scandal

 


Jay Jones, running to be Virginia’s top cop, was recently exposed as a violence-fantastizing lunatic: last week, a highly disturbing text message conversation between Jones and a Virginia lawmaker in August of 2022 went public. Per the National Review, Jones was provoked to homicidal thoughts after Republicans in the state legislature expressed a spirit of unity, paying homage to a recently-deceased Democrat (former) colleague. The rant began with Jones’s admission that if these particular Republicans were to die before him, he would attend their funerals specifically for the purpose of urinating on their graves.

At that point, his fantasy quickly turned to murder. Determining that if presented with a hypothetical scenario in which he was given two bullets to kill three men—Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, and Republican Speaker of the House Todd Gilbert—then “Gilbert gets two bullets to the head”. To add to it, Jones noted that you could swap out Hitler and Pol Pot, inserting the “worst” people, and Gilbert would still get both bullets “every time”.

(I imagine this is what Charlie Kirk’s killer would have said if Kirk were swapped out with Gilbert.)

Beyond daydreaming about murdering Gilbert, Jones also wished death on “little fascists” — and by that he meant Gilbert’s children.

As you might have guessed, Jay Jones is a major proponent of “common sense gun control” measures, and has even been endorsed by GIFFORDS, a “gun violence prevention and advocacy” PAC—while that endorsement was for Jones’s state house run, it remains on the website. And, about a month-and-a-half ago, Jones was also given $200,000 by the largest “gun safety” lobby group in the U.S., Everytown for Gun Safety. That organization has yet to address Jones’s derangement, let alone walk back their support. From a report at The Washington Free Beacon:

Everytown, which donated to Jones’s campaign on Aug. 26 and named him one of its ‘Gun Sense Candidates,’ has not weighed in on revelations that Jones, a former Virginia House delegate, said in a series of text messages in 2022 that then-Virginia House speaker Todd Gilbert, a Republican, deserved ‘two bullets to the head.’

Talking about shooting political rivals in the head makes for a “Gun Sense” candidate? In what world?

Like we keep saying, if Democrats and their voters would stop killing people with firearms, gun homicides would essentially drop to zero.

But that scandal isn’t even the last of it. Just yesterday, the New York Post published allegations that Jones had also favored killing cops, so the policed a little better:

Again, this is a man vying for the top cop position.

One of the greatest aspects about the foundation of the U.S. justice system is that it was built upon the premise of innocence until proven guilt. A burden of proof had to be met to determine whether or not a person was actually culpable for an offense.

While that’s all good and wonderful, I take the exact opposite approach to politicians, or anyone vying for a position of power. They are guilty until proven innocent, and as it turns out, that paradigm has yet to fail me.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/10/largest_gun_safety_group_in_us_proudly_backed_jay_jones_hasn_t_yet_walked_back_support_in_wake_of_text_message_scandal.html

Gut Changes Persist Years After Stopping Certain Medications

 by Rachel Ann T. Melegrito via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The body clears medicines within hours to weeks. However, a recent study suggests that drugs you took years ago may continue to affect your gut—and the more frequently and the longer they’re used, the greater their effect.

Nearly nine out of 10 commonly used medications leave permanent changes in gut bacteria - including drugs never before linked to digestive effects, according to the study.

This holds true not only for antibiotics but also for drugs used to manage high blood pressure, anxiety, and stomach hyperacidity.

We may be underestimating the impact of common medications on gut health,” Kara Siedman, nutritionist and director of partnerships with resbiotic Nutrition, who wasn’t involved in the research, told The Epoch Times.

Your Gut Remembers

The findings extend far beyond antibiotics, which doctors already know disrupt gut bacteria. The study showed that even medications targeting human cells—including antidepressants, beta-blockers, acid reflux medicines such as omeprazole, benzodiazepines, and metformin—reshaped the gut microbial composition.

We often think of medications as acting only on human cells, but they also interact with the gut ecosystem—the microbes, the intestinal barrier, and the immune system,” said Siedman.

The study found that many drugs left lasting effects on the gut, still visible more than three years after people stopped taking them. To test whether the drugs themselves were responsible, the researchers tracked a smaller subgroup over time. In this group, starting a drug caused predictable gut shifts, and stopping it often reversed them, supporting a causal link.

Findings showed that common drugs had similar effects to antibiotics. Benzodiazepines, commonly prescribed for anxiety, changed the gut as much as certain broad-spectrum antibiotics by reducing microbial diversity. Antidepressants also left patterns similar to those seen with antibiotics.

Gut Microbes Affected

A common bacterial type that increases with drug exposure, such as antidepressants and beta-blockers, is the Clostridium family. Some of these bacterial species are linked to rare cases of infections in humans.

Benzodiazepines are linked to increases in Dorea formicigenerans and Ruminococcus torques. Dorea formicigenerans are linked with obesity and metabolic syndrome in some human studies, though it can also produce beneficial metabolites. Ruminococcus torques is a bacterium that breaks down the mucus in the gut lining and is linked to gut conditions such as Crohn’s disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and metabolic disorders when present in abundance.

Drugs used for the same condition didn’t always affect the gut in the same way. For instance, within benzodiazepines, alprazolam (Xanax) led to a greater loss of gut microbial diversity than diazepam (Valium).

Proton pump inhibitors are linked to increased levels of oral bacteria such as Streptococcus parasanguinis and Veillonella parvula, both linked to periodontal disease and dental cavities.

Perhaps most striking was the cumulative nature of these changes. People with a history of antibiotic use never fully regained the same gut diversity as those who had never taken them, regardless of how long ago their last course was prescribed.

Past use added up: higher doses and longer durations left stronger, longer-lasting shifts in the microbiome. This additive pattern was seen with benzodiazepines, steroids, and beta-blockers.

How Drugs Affect the Gut Microbiome

There are several mechanisms by which medications might affect gut bacteria.

Drugs can slow or stop the growth of some gut bacteria while letting others thrive, shifting the microbiome’s balance. Some directly kill or suppress beneficial microbes, while others alter stomach acid, influence immune responses, or weaken the gut lining.

Antidepressants can disrupt how gut bacteria make and use energy, sometimes killing them directly. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can irritate the gut lining, making it leakier and more inflamed, which changes which microbes can thrive.

Beneficial microbes make short-chain fatty acids that help calm inflammation. Elimination of these microbes can lead to gut inflammation and breakdown of the gut barrier as short-chain fatty acid levels drop.

Gut inflammation and breakdown of the gut barrier can contribute to metabolic problems such as fatty liver, insulin resistance, and possibly higher cardiovascular risk.

Microbes can bounce back after stopping a drug, especially if the gut was diverse to begin with or if the diet supports regrowth. Although some may vanish completely if wiped out and not replenished.

A 2024 review noted that recovery isn’t always complete. Even when diversity returns, the mix of bacteria can stay changed for months because some species never come back or are replaced.

Babies are highly vulnerable to gut microbial changes.

A 2022 study found that infants who were given proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for more than 400 days had a less diverse, less balanced gut microbiome—and these changes persisted even after one month of stopping the medication. The researchers concluded that longer PPI use may disrupt the microbiome more than shorter courses.

Early-life exposure to antibiotics is also linked to increased risks of metabolic and atopic disorders, as well as higher risks of allergies, asthma, and metabolic diseases later in life.

Recovery Is Personal

While drugs affect the gut in predictable ways, the extent varies widely.

“Diet is the strongest driver of microbiome health and resilience. What we eat shapes microbial diversity, fiber fermentation, and bile acid production, all of which interact with drugs,” Siedman said.

A high-fiber diet helps restore balance after antibiotic use, while a low-fiber diet can weaken the gut barrier and fuel inflammation, slowing microbiome recovery. Gut inflammation can also change how quickly drugs are absorbed, and shifts in bile acids can alter how fat-soluble drugs are processed.

A person’s baseline microbiome composition is another key factor. “Two people can take the same medication and see very different microbiome shifts and recovery times depending on how diverse or robust their gut community was to begin with,” Siedman added.

How to Protect Your Gut

For patients who require ongoing medication, Siedman suggested practical ways to build resilience and support the gut ecosystem:

  • Focus on Fiber Diversity: Eat a variety of whole grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables to promote microbial diversity and support recovery.
  • Add Polyphenol-Rich Foods: Eat berries, drink green tea, and include cocoa to help feed beneficial bacteria and reduce inflammation.
  • Include Fermented Foods: Eat yogurt, drink kefir, and include sauerkraut and kimchi in your diet to add live microbes and compounds that nurture a healthy gut ecosystem.

How New York Democrats Came to Embrace Anti-Zionism

 Fifty years ago this November, Daniel Patrick Moynihan became an unlikely political star. Then serving as America’s ambassador to the United Nations, Moynihan led the charge against the UN’s infamous Arab- and Soviet-backed “Zionism is Racism” resolution. He could not prevent its passage—the resolution wasn’t repealed until after the fall of the Soviet Union—but Moynihan’s eloquent defense of Israel, the United States, and liberal democracy electrified the nation.

In 1976, still riding that momentum, Moynihan won the Democratic nomination for New York’s Senate seat. He went on to serve four terms with little primary or general election opposition in each of his reelection campaigns.

Today’s New York Democrats are a far cry from those of Moynihan’s era. They widely embrace Israel skepticism and “anti-Zionism.” What caused this shift? In short: growing political power of the Democratic Socialists of America, the Working Families Party, and other far-left organizations hostile to the Jewish state.

Moynihan was not just another New York politician. Before he was a senator, he wrote extensively on urban poverty, family breakdown, and the pathologies associated with the modern welfare state. His willingness to serve under both Republican and Democratic presidents reflected his conviction that intellectual seriousness mattered more than partisan conformity. At the UN, his defense of Israel was part of a broader defense of liberal, Western values—the idea that the United States had the duty and the moral authority to oppose attempts to delegitimize its allies.

In Moynihan’s era, New York Democrats were among Israel’s most fervent champions. New York City mayor Ed Koch, a moderate pragmatist, built a national following in the 1970s and 1980s in part on his willingness to confront fellow Democrats—including rising progressive star Jesse Jackson—over their hostility to the Jewish state. During the 1977 New York City mayoral primary, Bella Abzug, a far-left congresswoman from Manhattan, fought with Koch over who was more supportive of Israel.

One Empire State Democrat’s support for Israel even cost him his life. Robert F. Kennedy, the former U.S. attorney general elected to represent New York in the Senate in 1964, was one of Israel’s most steadfast defenders on Capitol Hill. His assassin, a Palestinian, claimed he murdered Kennedy because of the senator’s support for Israel during the 1967 Six Day War.

How times have changed. The new face of New York Democrats is Zohran Mamdani, the party’s 2025 nominee for mayor of New York City. Mamdani proudly calls himself an anti-Zionist, condemned Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as “on the brink of a genocide” only a week after the October 7 attacks, and backed legislation hostile to Israel as a state assemblyman. Mamdani has even vowed that he would order the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu should the Israeli prime minister visit the Big Apple—a move likely to run afoul of federal law.

In another era, a politician with such views would have been consigned to the margins of New York Democratic politics. Today, the state’s highest-ranking Democrats have embraced him. Governor Kathy Hochul, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, and State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins all lined up behind Mamdani’s mayoral candidacy in recent weeks. That the most powerful trio in state government would publicly endorse a candidate so openly hostile to Israel shows just how thoroughly the political ground has shifted.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan (Photo: Bettmann / Contributor / Bettmann via Getty Images)

Why would these savvy New York politicos support Mamdani? The answer is simple: power, politics, and primaries. The old Democratic county political machines have lost control of the primary voting electorate. The new force in Democratic primary politics is the radical coalition made up of the Working Families Party (WFP), the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and a collection of allied nonprofits. This new machine carried Mamdani to victory in this year’s 2025 Democratic primary.

The WFP and DSA take a backseat to no one in their hatred of the Jewish state. From the earliest days, the WFP called for Israel not to respond to the October 7 attacks. The DSA has gone even further: it recently passed an explicitly anti-Zionist resolution and now claims the ability to expel members and yank endorsements of candidates who it believes are insufficiently hostile to Israel.

None of this is lost on Hochul, Heastie, or Stewart-Cousins. Hochul—who ironically once worked on Moynihan’s Senate staff—will seek reelection in 2026. She already has a primary opponent, Lieutenant Governor Antonio Delgado, running against her from the left.

Heastie and Stewart-Cousins lead Democratic conferences with growing far-left contingents closely in sync with the WFP and DSA. For Hochul, Heastie, and Stewart-Cousins, not backing Mamdani is just bad politics.

Not every player in New York Democratic politics has played along. Jay Jacobs, the longtime chair of the state Democratic Party and a moderate from Long Island, recently announced that he would not support Mamdani’s candidacy. In response, many on the left have demanded his resignation as the state party boss. These calls haven’t just come from professional activists, either: the deputy leader of the State Senate Democrats, Mike Gianaris of Queens, has called on Jacobs to quit as party leader.

That Jacobs’s non-endorsement is controversial demonstrates the philosophical chasm between Mamdani and the remaining Moynihan Democrats. For Moynihan, defending Israel was part of the defense of liberal democracy. His stand at the UN was not merely about opposing one shameful General Assembly resolution. In Moynihan’s formulation, to remain silent while tyrannies defined Israel as racist was to accept a moral inversion that would corrode the West itself.

Sadly, the growing hostility to Israel in New York mirrors a national rise in hatred of Jews and the Jewish state. From campus protests to political rallies, across the political spectrum, views once confined to the ideological fringes are creeping into mainstream discourse. The normalization of such views should alarm all Americans.

This may be remembered as the year Moynihan’s Democratic Party finally died in the Empire State—when an older political order was vanquished by a radical new elite, one that sees Israel as an enemy.

Counting Noncitizens Distorts State Legislatures

 By Jason Richwine and Karen Zeigler

Previous CIS research has shown that immigration distorts both the apportionment of U.S. House seats among states and the drawing of U.S. House district lines within each state.1 This new report focuses on state legislatures. Using as examples the five states with the highest foreign-born shares — California, New Jersey, New York, Florida, and Maryland — the report shows that immigration causes state house districts to have dramatically different numbers of eligible voters.

The reason is that immigration has added to state populations about 25 million noncitizens — including legal permanent residents, guestworkers, foreign students, and illegal immigrants — but noncitizens by law cannot vote in state elections. Rather than draw lines to equalize the number of eligible voters in each legislative district, states instead equalize the total population in each district. Since noncitizens are not distributed uniformly throughout any state, some legislative districts have significantly more citizens — and, hence, more eligible voters — than other districts.

  • The difference between the greatest and smallest numbers of citizens at the district level can be very large within the same state. As the first section of Table 1 indicates, California Assembly District 1 has one member representing a district with 396,704 adult citizens, while District 57 has a member representing just 248,324 adult citizens.
  • The disparity is even larger for the Maryland House of Delegates. District 47B contains 15,244 adult citizens, which is only 40 percent as many as the 38,427 adult citizens in District 1B. (See “Methodological Notes” for an interpretive caveat.)
  • These disparities give disproportionate representation to some voters simply because they live near more noncitizens than other voters do. The middle section of Table 1 shows that, for the example of New York, there are 11.6 members of the State Assembly for every million adult citizens who live in districts that have noncitizen shares greater than the median district in the state. By contrast, there are only 9.8 members per million adult citizens who live in districts with foreign-born shares below the New York median.
  • Although greater representation for voters who live in high-noncitizen areas is unfair regardless of partisan implications, the distortion clearly benefits the Democratic party. Figures 1 through 5, along with the bottom row of Table 1, illustrate the district-level correlation between noncitizen population share and Democratic voting. As an example, for every one percentage-point increase in the noncitizen share of a California State Assembly district, the share voting Democratic in the district rises by an average of 1.42 percentage points. Put simply, because noncitizens tend to congregate in Democratic-leaning areas, they redistribute political power from Republican voters to Democratic voters.
  • To avoid the representational distortions caused by immigration, policymakers could try to exclude noncitizens from population counts, although there are statistical and legal hurdles to doing so.2 Policymakers could also encourage noncitizens to naturalize, although only about one-third are eligible.3 Another solution is simply to reduce immigration. Under a low-immigration system, structural effects on representation would naturally shrink along with the size of the noncitizen population.

 


Table 1. Noncitizens Distort Voter Representation in Multiple Ways


 Calif.N.J.N.Y.Fla.Md.
District Adult Citizen Populations     
   Highest396,704195,323111,485169,55738,427
   Lowest248,324124,21357,60695,12715,244
       Ratio11.601.571.941.782.52
      
Representatives per Million Adult Citizens ...     
    … in High Noncitizen Districts23.313.511.68.234.2
    ... in Low Noncitizen Districts22.911.79.87.030.2
      
Average Percentage-Point Increase in Democratic Vote Share for Every One Percentage-Point Increase in Noncitizen Share (by District)1.421.991.761.172.18

Source: Source: 2019-2023 ACS for demographic data; see “Methodological Notes” for election data.
1 When comparing total adult population sizes, the ratios are lower but still greater than one. See “Methodological Notes”.
2 A high (low) noncitizen district has a noncitizen share greater (lower) than the state's median district.


 


Voters in state legislative districts with greater shares of noncitizens tend to vote more Democratic.

Figure 1. California

Figure 2. New Jersey

Figure 3. New York

Figure 4. Florida

Figure 5. Maryland


Source: 2019-2023 ACS for demographic data; see “Methodological Notes” for election data.
Only the lower legislative chamber in each state is included in these analyses.


Methodological Notes

The Census Bureau website provides counts of adult citizens and noncitizens by state legislative district, based on data from the 2019-2023 American Community Survey (ACS).4 This report focuses on the lower house of each state’s legislature, since its members are more numerous and generally face election more often than members of the upper house.

The first section of Table 1 requires an interpretive caveat. Because the number of adults counted in each district in the 2019-2023 ACS sample is not the same as the 2020 total population counts used for redistricting, the data should show some population imbalances across districts even before the effect of noncitizens is taken into account. Indeed, Table 2 indicates that one state legislative district in Maryland has a total adult population (citizens and noncitizens together) of 38,844, while another district has just 30,132 adults. This 1.29 high-low ratio, while notable, is smaller than the difference between the highest and lowest adult citizen populations, which are 38,427 and 15,244, respectively, for a ratio of 2.52. In each state, the range of adult citizen populations across districts is substantially greater than the range of total adult populations.

 


Table 2. District Size Disparities Are Greater When Counting Only Adult Citizens


 Calif.N.J.N.Y.Fla.Md.
District Adult Populations     
   Highest430,909198,625119,667173,11438,844
   Lowest331,683140,68575,724127,55730,132
       Ratio1.301.411.581.361.29
      
District Adult Citizen Populations    
   Highest396,704195,323111,485169,55738,427
   Lowest248,324124,21357,60695,12715,244
       Ratio1.601.571.941.782.52

Source: 2019-2023 ACS for demographic data; see “Methodological Notes” for election data.


 

In collecting data for the bottom section of Table 1, the default procedure was to measure the Democratic voting share in each district in the general election of 2024. However, state-to-state idiosyncrasies in voting systems required some adjustments that are detailed below.

For each of its legislative districts, California operates a “jungle primary” in which candidates from all parties compete, and the top two vote-getters proceed to the general election. Because the two general-election candidates are so often from the same party, the primary results are actually more informative about the district’s political preferences. In Figure 1, the Democratic vote in California is the sum of the votes received by all Democratic candidates in the jungle primary.5

New Jersey residents vote for two candidates per district in odd-numbered years. The Democratic vote in each district is therefore the sum of the votes earned by the two Democrats running in 2023.6

No special adjustments were required for the Democratic vote in New York.7

In Florida, districts with an unopposed candidate were treated as voting 100 percent for that candidate’s party.8

Maryland residents vote for one, two, or three delegates per district every four years. The Democratic vote in each district is the sum of the votes for the Democratic candidates in the 2022 general election.9 Note that District 47B is such an outlier (54 percent noncitizen share, 100 percent Democratic voting) that it does not appear in Figure 5.

The general category of “write-in” was not included in any of the states’ vote totals.


End Notes

1 Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler, “Tilting the Balance”, Center for Immigration Studies, October 31, 2024; Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler, “How Non-Citizens Impact Political Representation and the Partisan Makeup of the U.S. House of Representatives”, Center for Immigration Studies, October 31, 2024.

2 Redistricting is based on full population counts from the decennial census, which does not currently ask a citizenship question. Furthermore, whether states would be allowed to draw districts based on citizenship is an unresolved issue in constitutional law. See Justice Alito’s concurrence in Evenwel v. Abbot (2016).

3 Sarah Miller, “Estimates of the Lawful Permanent Resident Population in the United States and the Subpopulation Eligible to Naturalize: 2024 and Revised 2023”, Department of Homeland Security, September 2024.

4 “Explore Census Data”, U.S. Census Bureau.

5 “March 5, 2024, Presidential Primary Election, State Assembly Member”, California State Portal.

6 “New Jersey 2023 election results”, WHYY.

7 “2024 New York State Assembly General Election Results”, The Journal News.

8 “Official Results”, Florida Department of State, Division of Elections.

9 “Official 2022 Gubernatorial General Election Results for House of Delegates”, State Board of Elections.


https://cis.org/Report/How-Counting-Noncitizens-Distorts-State-Legislatures

IDF shoots down two drones launched from Yemen

 The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said on Wednesday that two drones launched by Yemen's Houthis were intercepted by their military. One drone was shot down over the Israeli-Egyptian border without triggering sirens, while another prompted alerts "according to protocol."

The report came a day after sirens sounded in Eilat, a city close to Egypt, when the IDF confirmed that the air force had intercepted a hostile aircraft launched from Yemen. The incidents coincide with renewed Israeli-Hamas talks in Sharm el-Sheikh.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/IDF-shoots-down-two-drones-launched-from-Yemen/64948990