Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Dubai Crackdown Hits Iran's Economic Lifeline, Squeezes IRGC Networks

 By Negar Mojtahedi of Iran International

The arrest of dozens of IRGC-linked money changers in the United Arab Emirates is one of the most serious blows yet to Tehran’s sanctions-evasion network, laying bare how heavily the Islamic Republic has depended on Dubai as an economic lifeline.

Sources familiar with the matter told Iran International that UAE authorities detained dozens of money changers tied to financial entities linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, shut down associated companies and closed their offices. The crackdown follows days of mounting regional tensions and comes after other measures targeting Iranian nationals, including visa revocations and tighter travel restrictions through Dubai.

For years, Dubai has served as Iran’s main offshore financial artery, where oil proceeds, petrochemical revenues and rial conversions were turned into dollars, dirhams and euros beyond the reach of the country’s battered domestic banking system.

“This is going to be a real problem for Tehran because Dubai was an economic lung for the Iranian regime,” Jason Brodsky of United Against Nuclear Iran told Iran International.

“That is economic pressure and diplomatic isolation in a way that the UAE is able to employ against the Iranian regime, and it will have a very considerable impact.”

"Most critical hub"

According to Miad Maleki, a former senior US Treasury sanctions strategist and now a senior fellow at FDD, the UAE is not just one sanctions-evasion hub among many.

“The UAE is the single most critical jurisdiction in the Iranian regime’s sanctions-evasion architecture,” Maleki said.

Dubai’s exchange houses have long given the IRGC and the Quds Force access to the hard currency needed to finance proxy groups including Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and militias in Iraq.

The detention of trusted IRGC-linked money changers threatens networks that took years to build.

“These trust-based sarraf (money changer) relationships, bank accounts and corporate structures are not quickly replaceable,” Maleki said.

He added that even exchange houses untouched by the crackdown were now likely to think twice before processing Iran-linked transactions, sharply raising both the cost and the risk of doing business with the Guards.

The pressure comes as Iran’s domestic economy is already under severe strain: Foreign reserves, once estimated at around $120 billion in 2018, had fallen below $9 billion by 2020, leaving Iran increasingly reliant on offshore currency channels.

Dubai as ‘washing machine’

Mohammad Machine-Chian, a senior economic journalist at Iran International, said the UAE remains Iran’s most important economic conduit after China. “The UAE is Iran’s most critical economic lifeline after China,” he said.

He said Dubai’s free zones host hundreds of Iranian-linked shell companies used to mask oil and petrochemical sales, launder proceeds and channel hard currency back to Tehran.

Bilateral trade has hovered between $16 billion and $28 billion in recent years, with Iranian non-oil exports alone reaching roughly $6 billion to $7 billion annually, according to Machine-Chian.

A sustained crackdown could cost Tehran tens of billions of dollars in revenue streams while severing what he described as Iran’s “USD cash lifeline.”

Dubai has also functioned as a transit point for illicit Iranian funds moving onward to North America, including transfers routed to the United States and Canada through correspondent banking and hawala networks.

As Maleki put it, “Dubai is the washing machine: Iranian oil proceeds and rial conversions go in, sanitized dirham and dollar transactions come out.”

From diplomacy to backlash

Beyond the financial damage, analysts say the crackdown reflects a broader political rupture between Tehran and the Persian Gulf states. Brodsky said Iran’s attacks on neighboring countries had transformed the strategic environment in the region.

“The relationship between Iran and the GCC countries is not going to go back to the way it was before Operation Epic Fury,” he said.

Where Persian Gulf states had once pushed for diplomacy, Iran’s retaliation has instead driven them closer to Washington and Israel.

For years, Tehran sought to encircle Israel in what it called a “ring of fire” through regional proxies. 

Now, Brodsky said, the Islamic Republic has reversed that dynamic.

“They wanted to encircle Israel in a ring of fire,” he said. “Now they are basically encircling themselves in a ring of fire because they’ve been angering their neighbors with all of their attacks.”

He said that reversal could carry long-term consequences, including deeper Persian Gulf-Israel security coordination and new openings for the Abraham Accords.

“The missile threat and drone threat have become paramount in this conflict,” Brodsky said. “That could drive these countries even closer to the US and Israel.”

'Collapse within weeks'

The UAE crackdown comes as signs of mounting economic distress are mounting inside Iran. Sources previously told Iran International that President Masoud Pezeshkian had warned senior officials that without a ceasefire, the economy could face collapse within weeks.

Across major cities, ATMs have been running short of cash, banking services have faced intermittent disruptions and government workers have reported months of delayed salary payments. 

With inflation in essential goods already above 100 percent before the war, the loss of Dubai’s financial channels could deepen the regime’s crisis. 

For Tehran, the arrests in the UAE are more than a financial disruption. They may signal that one of Iran’s most dependable external pressure valves is starting to close.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/dubai-crackdown-hits-irans-economic-lifeline-squeezes-irgc-networks

Birthright citizenship is nuts

 by Jack Hellner

Today, the Supreme Court will decide on Trump v. Barbara, a new challenge to “birthright citizenship,” so in that spirit, here are some facts about birthright citizenship from a simple internet search:

The concept of birthright citizenship is based on an 1898 SCOTUS decision (United States v. Wong Kim Ark) when there were no planes allowing the entire third world to rush in, and birth tourism didn’t exist.

Very few countries in the world allow birthright citizenship. European countries don’t allow it, nor do Japan, China, Great Britain, or Australia.

Pew estimates around five million anchor babies are living with parents who are not citizens.

61% of these households are on one or more government welfare programs. Note: It is illegal for non-citizens to receive welfare benefits.

225,000 to 300,000 babies are born each year to mothers who are here illegally. Another 70,000 are born to mothers who are here on vacation. It is generally not recommended for mothers to travel close to their due date, so isn’t that odd? My intelligent guess is most of these mothers did not pay the hospitals for their healthcare.

Why are we promoting birth tourism?

Why are the illegals allowed to stay after the baby is born since they are here illegally?

Democrats want open borders and say we can’t send the parents back because that would separate families. The solution is easy. Get rid of birthright citizenship so this doesn’t happen, and send the babies back to their home country with their parents.

China is really pushing for new babies to be born in the U.S. so they can further influence their control:

Chinese national pleads guilty to running ‘birth tourism’ scheme that helped aliens give birth in US to secure birthright citizenship

 

A Chinese national pleaded guilty today to federal criminal charges for running an Orange County-based ‘birth tourism’ business that catered to wealthy pregnant clients and Chinese government officials, charging them tens of thousands of dollars to help them give birth in the United States so their children would get U.S. citizenship.

Why do we openly allow our enemies to infiltrate the U.S.? And, what about this story?

Chinese gaming billionaire reportedly sires more than 100 surrogate kids in US, hopes they’ll marry Elon Musk’s children

A Chinese billionaire who allegedly fathered more than 100 US-born children through surrogacy agencies reportedly hopes the kiddies will one day marry Elon Musk’s children and create a sprawling family dynasty. 

Xu Bo, a 48-year-old wealthy recluse who founded the online gaming company Duoyi, calls himself ‘China’s first father’ and has been hell-bent on siring at least ‘50 high-quality sons,’ according to social-media posts verified as his by the Wall Street Journal.

And here is how the compliant media is covering the issue as they campaign for continuing birthright citizenship in support of Democrats and getting more people to be dependent on the government. They call Trump’s desire to get rid of birthright citizenship controversial instead of calling the original decision controversial. Everything Trump does is called controversial to influence the public instead of informing them. This article by USA Today in my local paper was titled “History bolsters birthright citizenship.”

Bad laws or rulings, regardless of being part of America’s “history,” should be overturned—and birthright citizenship is nuts.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/04/birthright_citizenship_is_nuts.html

Justice Jackson strains mightily to justify birthright citizenship

by Noel S. Williams 

SCOTUS just heard oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara, AKA the Birthright Citizenship case. As we now know (if we didn’t before), the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause grants birthright citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the US and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” That clause raises some interesting questions: Can someone be subject to the jurisdiction of two countries? Can someone hold allegiance to two sovereigns?

In her questioning of Cecillia Wang, the ACLU lawyer, Justice Jackson tried to magically concoct two types of jurisdiction: permanent and local. In her strained example, a foreigner traveling in Japan is temporarily subject to local jurisdiction—if the traveler’s wallet is stolen, for example, Japanese authorities have jurisdiction to investigate the crime. Nevertheless, that traveler is still subject to the permanent jurisdiction of their home country.

Here’s where the crafty concoction becomes a stretch: Jackson implied that temporary sojourners (parents on a Birth Tourism escapade, perhaps) might be subject to local jurisdiction (e.g., in the U.S.); their babies, having been born here, are subject to our permanent jurisdiction. The implication of Jackson’s argument is that parents have temporary allegiance; babies have permanent allegiance.

Huh? Except in rare juvenile delinquency and runaway cases, children usually owe allegiance to their parents up until the age of majority. But there is a potentially craftier deceit: Wang and the seemingly complicit Jackson seem to suggest one can hold allegiance to two sovereigns. Therefore, even if a “sojourner” (aka illegal alien) is subject to a foreign potentate, the illegal can still be under our jurisdiction—temporarily, at least.

In essence, they hold allegiance to two sovereigns and abide by the 14th Amendment’s requirements. Furthermore, their offspring are presumed to have allegiance to the jurisdiction of their birth, even if their sojourning parents are from an enemy country, and an enemy country is where Birth Tourism is out of control.

Justice Jackson used Japan as her example, but China may better demonstrate the incongruity between permanent and local jurisdiction and its ramifications for allegiance.

It is China (one wonders if someone named “Wang”—representing the ACLU and referring to “white people” during arguments—can be objective), where birth tourism to the U.S. is rampant. Some of our territories, including the Northern Mariana Islands, may not require a visa.

There are indications that the CCP facilitates the practice, even as part of an invisible coup. Moreover, Chinese nationals who are naturalized over here hardly demonstrate their allegiance to our jurisdiction. In fact, they are renowned for spying, stealing secrets, and sowing anti-American discord despite their domicile and so-called “permanent allegiance.”

Based on abundant empirical evidence, China is adversarial to the U.S. Justice Jackson and her ilk may be skilled at twisting words, willfully misinterpreting framers’ intentions, and convoluting meanings to suit their activism, but this is just commonsense for average folk: it is impossible to have dual allegiance to two sovereigns when they are enemies.herefore, it is common sense (whether or not it is currently legal to carve out exceptions) to end birthright citizenship for Chinese sojourners daring to game the system. Their allegiance is to their parents and the CCP (who probably sponsored them), not to the last great hope of Earth.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/04/justice_jackson_strains_mightily_to_justify_birthright_citizenship.html

Acquittal! A ‘bad mood’ now a legitimate legal defense for murder

 by Olivia Murray

Last August, law enforcement in the German state of Saarland responded to a call of armed robbery at a local convenience store, where they came upon the suspect, a knife-wielding Turkish teenager who’d just bagged around €600—the teen attacked and during the scuffle, “seized a service weapon from a trainee, and opened fire.” (I would like to know if that “trainee” who couldn’t keep hold of the firearm was a woman.) Ahmet G., the 19-year-old miscreant, hit 34-year-old Police Chief Inspector Simon Bohr with a spray of bullets, and Bohr died at the scene after being shot in “the head, face, neck, shoulder, abdomen, and back.” Bohr also left behind a wife and child(ren).

But, Ahmet was feeling grumpy that day, in a “bad mood” because he was a total loser with a “lack of prospects,” so instead of the death penalty—a life for a life is the only equitable response—or even a life sentence, Ahmet has been acquitted, and will spend just the briefest time in a psychiatric care facility to convalesce.

From Thomas Brooke at Remix News:

The Saarbrücken Regional Court ruled that the 19-year-old gunman, Ahmet Gürsel, bore diminished responsibility at the time of the killing of Police Chief Inspector Simon Bohr, 34, and instead convicted him only of aggravated robbery, ordering his placement in a secure psychiatric facility.

The court found that due to his “anxiety” and mental faculties, “his ability to control his actions” was “significantly impaired,” but meanwhile, they jail native Germans who post online about the migrant problem.

So apparently being too low-IQ and stressed is a legitimate defense for criminal behavior, which seems to be a valid defense for everyone except…white people. Sure this was Germany, but we see it in the U.S. all the time; we all know there’s a different justice system for non-whites, who are all too often held to different standards, recipients of “reparative” (in)justice. (For a brief and recent list of examples, see a related blog on that here.)

A tiered justice system is no justice system at all.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/04/acquittal_a_bad_mood_now_a_legitimate_legal_defense_for_murder.html

CMS pilot allows hemp products in care plans

 CMS is piloting a new program that permits some clinicians to offer certain hemp-derived products to Medicare patients as part of their care plans.

The new Substance Access Beneficiary Engagement Incentive is part of CMS’ Innovation Center model-testing framework, designed to evaluate whether hemp-derived products can improve patient outcomes when integrated into coordinated, clinician-led care plans.

The initiative operates under the 2018 Agriculture Improvement Act’s hemp provisions and aligns with an executive order President Donald Trump signed in December, supporting hemp innovation. The move does not legalize or authorize any drug that is otherwise prohibited under federal drug law.

Five things to know:

1. The option is only available to physicians and Medicare beneficiaries participating in the ACO REACH Model and the Enhancing Oncology Model. In 2027, the incentive will expand to the Long-Term Enhanced ACO Design Model. 

2. Five ACOs in the REACH Model have submitted plans to begin offering the incentive as soon as April 1, pending CMS approval, with additional organizations able to join over time. Eligible patients may receive up to $500 per year in approved hemp-derived products if their clinician determines it is safe and appropriate. Participants must ensure products meet quality and safety standards, including third-party testing for potency and contaminants.

3. Clinicians may only offer federally legal hemp items containing no more than 0.3% delta-9 THC. Prohibited products include inhalable items (such as vapes), oral products containing more than 3 mg per serving of tetrohydrocannabinols, and products with cannabinoids not naturally produced by cannabis plants. 

4. CMS will not pay for or reimburse providers for these products, and the initiative does not change Medicare coverage.

5. The agency will monitor implementation and evaluate whether the products deliver cost-effective improvements in patients’ symptoms and quality of life.

“CMS is committed to innovation that meets patients where they are while maintaining strong safeguards and clinical oversight,” said CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz, MD, in an April 1 release. “Under the President’s leadership, we’re expanding the tools available to improve patients’ health while generating important insights into how providers can use these tools safely and effectively in real-world care settings.”

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/patient-safety-outcomes/cms-pilot-allows-hemp-products-in-care-plans-5-notes/

19 health systems dropping Medicare Advantage plans

 Hospitals and health systems continue to sever ties with certain Medicare Advantage plans in 2026, citing persistent frustrations with prior authorization denials and slow reimbursement from insurers.

MA now covers more than half of the nation’s older adults, making these contract terminations increasingly consequential for patient access. Becker’s has tracked these decisions since 2023; our 2025 coverage is here.

Nineteen health systems dropping Medicare Advantage plans:
Editor’s note: This is not an exhaustive list and includes contract breaks effective in 2026. It will continue to be updated this year.

  1. Tampa, Fla.-based Moffitt Cancer Center went out of network with Aetna MA in December 2025 and will go out of network with Humana MA in July 2026.

  2. NewYork-Presbyterian and UnitedHealthcare MA will go out of network on May 1 without a new agreement in place, following an extension of the original January deadline.

  3. Spartanburg (S.C.) Regional is slated to go out of network with Aetna MA on April 15.

  4. Tacoma, Wash.-based MultiCare no longer contracts with any nongroup MA PPO plans in the Puget Sound region.

  5. Rochester, Minn.-based Mayo Clinic went out-of-network with most MA plans from UnitedHealthcare and Humana, per the Star Tribune.

  6. Irvine, Calif.-based Providence Clinical Network, which includes 15 hospitals across California, went out of network with UnitedHealthcare MA in January.

  7. New York City-based Mount Sinai went out of network with Anthem MA in January.

  8. Chapel Hill, N.C.-based UNC Health went out of network with Humana, WellCare (Centene), and Health Care Service Corp. (formerly Cigna) MA plans in January.

  9. Houston-based Memorial Hermann and BCBS Texas MA went out of network in January.

  10. Allentown, Pa.-based Lehigh Valley Health Network went out of network with UnitedHealthcare MA on Jan. 25, 2026.

  11. Lynchburg, Va.-based Centra Health dropped Humana MA in January.

  12. Most primary care providers at Somerville, Mass.-based Mass General Brigham are no longer in network with MA plans from UnitedHealthcare or BCBS Massachusetts.

  13. Boise, Idaho-based St. Luke’s Health System no longer accepts Humana MA.

  14. Montrose (Colo.) Regional Health ended its contract with Humana MA in 2026.

  15. Kettering (Ohio) Health no longer contracts with Humana and Devoted Health MA in 2026.

  16. Clarion-based Iowa Specialty Hospitals and Clinics dropped all MA plans in 2026, except for Aetna, Medigold, UnitedHealthcare, and Wellmark BCBS.

  17. Batesville, Ark.-based White River Health went out of network with Aetna MA in February and with UnitedHealthcare MA in April.

  18. Sioux Falls, S.D.-based Avera Health is no longer in-network with Aetna MA in 2026.

  19. South Kingstown, R.I.-based South County Hospital is out of network with Aetna MA.

PMGC Holdings Inc. [NASDAQ: ELAB] Expands Asset Base to $13.8M, a 43% Increase from 2024



PMGC Holdings (NASDAQ: ELAB) filed its Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, reporting a year of capital deployment and asset growth. Total assets rose 43% to approximately $12.87M and shareholders' equity increased to about $7.84M.

The company completed three acquisitions in 2025 (Pacific Sun Packaging on July 7, AGA Precision Systems on July 18, and Indarg Engineering on Oct 26) to expand precision manufacturing and specialty IT packaging operations, and advanced biopharma subsidiary Northstrive with clinical and preclinical programs targeting muscle preservation alongside GLP-1 therapies.