Search This Blog

Sunday, September 30, 2018

Chinese pharma market primed for growth after sweeping reforms


China has carved itself a place as a major player in the pharma industry due to the number of clinical trials it is running, thanks to the reforms it has put in place.
As the world’s second-largest national pharmaceutical market in 2017, worth $122.6 billion, China was also the biggest emerging market for pharmaceuticals, with growth tipped to reach $145-175 billion by 2022, according to healthcare information firm IQVIA.
The reasons for this are a combination of the country’s regulatory reform and the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA)’s stance on prioritising drug innovation and ensuring that clinical trials and information are of a high standard.
It is hoped that the CFDA’s approach will mean that the major challenges to China’s position as an R&D authority – backlogs of drug applications, long timelines for regulatory review and questions about the quality of locally-produced drugs – will be met.
The ageing population is undoubtedly a factor when it comes to China’s push to expand its clinical research pipelines. The incidence of diabetes and cancer is rising sharply and the need for therapies is clear.
The majority of diseases in the country are non-communicable, and smoking is a major cause of cancer. In fact, the main cause of death in China is cancer, with the China National Cancer Centre finding that more than 780,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer every year, underlining the need for national, targeted measures to tackle the disease. China is home to one-third of all new cancer cases globally.
In a drive to address this growing problem, China is making strides in the development of CAR-T immunotherapy, whereby chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is inserted into T cells, which are a type of white blood cell. There are reportedly 116 CAR-T clinical trials registered in China – more than in the US.
Also, AstraZeneca and Merck’s Lynparza (olaparib) recently became the first poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in the country to treat platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. It is the first overseas drug to be sanctioned under China’s new priority review policy on the basis of data from international sources.
There were 33,075 diagnosed cases of ovarian cancer in urban China in 2017, according to data and analytics company GlobalData. The number of incident cases is expected to increase to over 46,000 by 2027.
These types of drugs have been used in the US and Europe for several years and China is a new market – obviously beneficial for patients as well as pharma – and the fact that such drugs are able to reach those who need them more speedily is momentous. There was previously no treatment in China for women with recurrent ovarian cancer.
GlobalData analyst, Paul Jeng, said, “For now, the short-term successes of China’s regulatory reforms are a preview for how the next years may play out in China’s healthcare market. In particular, the activity around PARP inhibitors indicates that accelerated approvals will be likely driven by areas of high unmet need in oncology and other therapeutic spaces.”
Progress
Reform has undoubtedly paved the way for such progress. Last year, the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) approved the CFDA as a member.
The ICH’s mission is to “achieve greater harmonisation worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner”.
Joining the ICH means China will follow all of the body’s guidance and requirements. This will help to increase patient access to safe, effective, and high quality pharmaceuticals, and also ensure that the latter are developed and registered properly.
Along these lines, China’s “Opinions on Reforming the Review and Approval System for Drugs and Medical Devices” was issued by the country’s government in August 2015. Its main purposes are to: eliminate the backlog, upgrade the quality of generic drugs, encourage new drugs in R&D in line with global development, and improve the quality and transparency of the review and approval process. The review process is due to be lowered from five years to six months by the end of the year.
Another consideration is that China has changed its policy on contract manufacturing organisations (CMOs) so it can accept overseas clinical trial data. The registration requirements for imported drugs have been softened, drug lag times have been shortened, and foreign investors are being encouraged to undertake global studies in China.
One such company is Japan’s pharma giant, Takeda, which is taking a keen interest in this blossoming market. The firm’s CEO, Christophe Weber, said its China-based programmes are only second to those it runs in the US.
Weber has reportedly said that Takeda is planning to sell seven new drugs in China over the next five years, as Takeda’s plans to buy Dublin-based rare diseases specialist pharma company Shire are expected to complete next year.
He said there was “no reason in the long term China shouldn’t be our second-biggest business in the world” adding that he hoped to be able to add new products in the country at the same pace as is achieved in the US and Europe.
Promisingly, Weber referred to China as a ‘core’ country, saying that Takeda regards it in the same way as it does the US and Europe in terms of research, new drug development and reimbursement.
Soaring sales
China’s growing openness and reforms have already resulted in changes. The Financial Times reports that AstraZeneca and Pfizer, the two largest overseas pharma companies in China, found that sales rose by 24% in the last financial quarter, compared to the same period in 2017.
The Chinese pharma industry is undoubtedly playing catch-up to get to where it wants to be, but state insurance means that costs, which were high because companies were selling branded off-patent drugs, have been lowered so they can be added to state co-payment schemes that attract reimbursements.
And, it is worth noting that the country is keen to boost its domestic pharma market – there are around 5,000 domestic drug manufacturers in China, many of which are SMEs focusing on generics, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or traditional medicine.
It is likely, as innovation and practices become more streamlined, that the global market won’t have such a toe-hold in China, but rather that Chinese products are used more widely within the country and elsewhere, as high-quality generics are produced.

Cantor Fitzgerald Starts Puma Biotechnology (PBYI) at Overweight


Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Alethia Young initiates coverage on Puma Biotechnology

Cantor Fitzgerald Starts Celgene (CELG) at Overweight


Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Alethia Young initiates coverage on Celgene.

LogicBio Jumps on the Gene Therapy 2.0 Wave and Lines Up an IPO


Another gene therapy company is on its way to the public markets. But this one, LogicBio Therapeutics, is part of a newer crop of gene therapy developers that aim to overcome the potential shortcomings of the treatments on the market or in human trials. LogicBio’s technology is still preclinical, but the company aims to start human testing next year, and it is now planning an IPO to finance that research.
Cambridge, MA-based LogicBio set a preliminary $86 million target for its IPO. The company has applied for a listing on the Nasdaq exchange under the stock symbol “LOGC.” LogicBio aims to use the IPO cash to start its first clinical trial, for a rare inherited liver disease called methylmalonic acidemia (MMA).
Gene therapy has finally come of age after years of ups and downs. By introducing a functioning version of a faulty or missing gene into a cell. these treatments are intended to provide a long-lasting, if not permanent treatment for a genetic disorder. One product, for a genetic form of blindness, launched in the U.S. at the beginning of the year. More, for hemophilia, spinal muscular atrophy, and more, could follow, and several gene therapy developers are publicly traded. But even with the promise these treatments have shown, it’s unclear how long a therapy will last and who will respond. And when given to children, it’s possible some gene therapies might lose their effect over time as they grow and their cells divide.
LogicBio is one of several emerging companies trying to address these gene therapy issues. Its technology, called GeneRide, was developed to insert genes into specific locations in the genome. The company says this approach enables the transferred genetic material to remain stable as cells divide and tissue grows. The LogicBio gene therapy is inserted into the genome via a naturally occurring DNA repair process called homologous recombination. This process avoids using enzymes that cut DNA—a feature of gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR. These enzymes can cause unwanted and potentially dangerous modifications to the DNA, which in turn could cause tumors to form, LogicBio says in its prospectus. (LogicBio isn’t alone in trying to harness homologous recombination; Homology Medicines(NASDAQ: FIXX), which went public in March, is in the mix as well.)
LogicBio is starting with a potential treatment for MMA. Infants who have the condition can’t process certain fats and proteins, which leads to vomiting, dehydration, weak muscles, and developmental delays, among other problems. MMA has no FDA-approved therapies. Treatment for the disorder includes a low-protein and high calorie diet, antibiotics, and organ transplant, according to the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. Depending on the severity of the disorder, MMA can be fatal.
The company’s MMA gene therapy, LB-001, is meant to help MMA patients produce more of the protein that they lack. LogicBio plans to start a Phase 1/2 clinical trial by the end of next year.
LogicBio is also developing potential treatments for hemophilia B; alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, which can lead to lung disease; and the rare disease Crigler Najjar Syndrome, which renders the body unable to clear a compound produced in the breakdown of old red blood cells.
LogicBio is led by CEO Fred Chereau, an industry veteran who has held senior roles at aTyr Pharma, Shire (NASDAQ: SHPG), and Genzyme. The company has raised $50 million in venture financing, most recently a $45 million Series B round of financing last year. LogicBio’s largest shareholder is OrbiMed, which holds a 35.3 percent stake in the company, according to the filing. Other large shareholders include Arix BioScience (LSE: ARIX), Pontifax, and BioDiscovery 5.
The company was founded in 2015, based on technologies licensed from Stanford University and the University of Texas System. The company spent $3.6 million on R&D in the first half of 2018, and had $18.2 million in cash at the end of June.

Big Pharma Seeks More Partnerships, Evidence in Digital Therapeutics


“Digital therapeutics” startups are starting to win more respect—and investment dollars—from pharmaceutical giants. But the two sides are still figuring out how to work together to capitalize on the potential for apps, devices, and other software-enabled technologies to impact patients’ health.
That’s what stood out to me the most as I listened to leaders from some of the world’s largest life sciences companies—Novartis (NYSE: NVS), Sanofi (NYSE: SNY), AstraZeneca (NYSE: AZN), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)—talk about their firms’ interest in the nascent field of digital medicine at an industry conference, DTxDM East, held at a Boston waterfront hotel this week.
“These really, really large organizations want [digital therapeutics] to work and want to deploy investments into this,” said moderator Edward Cox, the CEO of San Diego-based digital therapeutics startup Dthera Sciences.
Pharma’s growing interest in digital medicine—in which electronics such as smartphone apps serve as the therapy—comes as the industry has gained momentum over the past year. Last September, a product developed by Pear Therapeutics, based in Boston and San Francisco, became the first software the FDA has cleared to be prescribed to help treat a disease (substance use disorder). The FDA is currently reviewing Akili Interactive Labs’ first experimental product—a mobile video game designed to assess and treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—after Boston-based Akili reported a successful 348-patient clinical trial last December.
Meanwhile, Click Therapeutics recently raised $17 million in a venture round led by Sanofi Ventures. New York-based Click will use the money to boost its efforts to win FDA clearance for a pipeline of mobile apps that would be prescribed to treat medical conditions—such as depression, insomnia, and chronic pain—either on their own or in combination with drugs or other standard treatments.
And in August, the FDA granted “breakthrough device” designation to a development-stage product from Cox’s company, Dthera. If the software product, DTHR-ALZ, ultimately wins approval, Dthera said it would become the “first non-pharmacological prescription treatment” for Alzheimer’s disease symptoms.
These milestones help bring legitimacy to an industry still proving itself. But there’s a lot of work to be done on that front, panelists said at Tuesday’s event.
“Over the next five years, we’ve got to focus on showing the evidence with digital therapeutics,” said Joris van Dam, executive director and head of digital therapeutics at the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research. “If we fail, it’s because we cannot show outcomes.”
Other big questions pharma companies are mulling: How should digital treatments be priced? How much will insurers pay for them? What’s the business value for drug makers? Can digital therapeutics businesses and their pharma partners make money from these products?
Digital therapeutics startups and pharma companies need each other, argued Melinda Decker, AstraZeneca’s head of “intelligent pharmaceuticals.” But the two sides’ attitudes and strategies don’t always mesh well.
“One of the challenges I find with digital therapeutics companies is their mindset is very much on, ‘How do we sell this as it is?’—rather than how [they] might partner with drug companies,” Decker said. “In dealing with the likes of Apple and Google, everyone is looking for, ‘How do I make Candy Crush and sell it for $5 a download?’ … [Therapeutics are] a completely different model.”
Bozidar Jovicevic, Sanofi’s vice president and global head of digital medicines, said he doesn’t like that pharma companies are sometimes “seen as distributors of digital therapeutics,” rather than more collaborative partners. Van Dam agrees that collaboration is key.
“These technologies have a tremendous opportunity to bring benefits to patients,” Novartis’s van Dam said. “We have a collective, not just opportunity, but collective obligation to get it right. What I don’t like is conversations that start with, ‘Yeah, pharma just doesn’t get it.’”
Pharma might not get it in some cases, he added, but all stakeholders are still trying to understand and advance the sector. The more important problem, van Dam argued, is “How can we work together?”
For his part, Dthera’s Cox said he doesn’t think pharma companies are “slow”—a common critique from startups in any sector seeking partnerships and investments from bigger, more established companies. Rather, “I think they’re rigorous,” Cox said. “It’s not the same thing.”
For patients, one of the key components will be making it easier to manage an expanding catalog of digital health products.
“All the solutions are very siloed,” said Jeff Mathers, senior director of software engineering and emerging technology at Johnson & Johnson Technology. “Nobody wants to download 35 apps” and share their medical information 35 separate times, he said. “That’s just not sustainable.”
In the coming years, Mathers envisions hospitals and clinics making it possible for patients to register for a variety of apps in one online location and more seamlessly use them. Otherwise, “they’ll just go crazy managing all these tools,” he said.

Midterms could boost some healthcare stocks, Barron’s says


Potential electoral results could favor the outlook for policies beneficial to a wide range of hospital, pharmaceutical, and other healthcare-related companies, Lauren Rublin writes in this week’s edition of Barron’s. Policy experts favor Centene (CNC), WellCare Health (WCG), Molina Healthcare (MOH), HCA Healthcare (HCA), Tenet (THC), Encompass Health (EHC), Becton Dickinson (BDX), Cerner (CERN), Dentsply Sirona (XRAY) and Teladoc Health (TDOC) as beneficiaries of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, the reported noted, adding that is especially likely if Democrats win more state elections.

270 Painkillers Per Person: DEA Probes Pill Mills in Small Tenn. Town


DEA agents discover another small town in America’s Rust Belt with an overabundance of opioids
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) last week conducted inspections at several pharmacy locations in the Clay County, Tennessee town of Celina, following a massive spike of painkiller purchases from drug distribution companies.
According to the sales data, obtained by the DEA, several pharmacies purchased nearly 1.5 million pills in 2017, a number that is considered an anomaly of a rural area in America’s Rust Belt region.
Home to just 7,800 people, the pharmacies last year purchased enough opioids to provide 270 pain pills for every man, woman, and child living in the small Tennessee town.
In response to the opioid crisis, the DEA is now aggressively monitoring supply chains of pill distributors that primarily feed into hard-hit states.
“DEA’s action today is one of many proactive measures we are taking to help prevent drug diversion, abuse, and trafficking that end lives and destroy families and communities,” said Louisville Division Special Agent in Charge Chris Evans, who runs DEA operations in Tennessee, West Virginia, and Kentucky.
“When DEA sees abnormal patterns such as this one, we must act. Too many rural communities like Clay County are often targets for both addicts and drug traffickers who exploit the most vulnerable and who profit from addiction. We’ve lost too many Americans to opioid abuse,” Evans said.
Notice of inspection was issued to Anderson Hometown Pharmacy, LLC at 151 MacArthur Avenue, and Walgreens at 1000 Gainesville Highway. The DEA said an administrative inspection warrant was also issued to another pharmacy, Clay County Express Pharmacy, LLC at 651 Brown Street. Some of these inspections included a complete review of receipts and distributions, employee interviews, and all other pharmacy activities.
Last week, the Centers for Disease Control reported that drug overdose deaths in 2017 were up 7% from 2016 and that more than 72,000 American died the previous year — that is more than American soldier deaths in the Vietnam War (58,220 US military fatal casualties). This is a more than 200% increase over a decade. Of those overdose deaths, just over 49,000 were from synthetic opioids, which include prescription painkillers, heroin, fentanyl, and fentanyl analogs. Pain management, then pill abuse, is often the starting point for heroin and fentanyl addicts.
Days ago, we reported a similar incident in Williamson, West Virginia, where two pharmacies just four blocks apart pumped 20.8 million prescription painkillers in a town of only 3,191 residents.
It was reported that in December 2002 to January 2010, more than 335,000 prescriptions for painkillers were issued by Dr. Katherine Hoover at a small clinic in the struggling West Virginia town, a rate of about 130 per day.
Williamson is a small blue-collar city of some 3,000 residents just across the Tug Fork River from Kentucky. When the coal industry collapsed, it left behind many miners – many of whom were already reliant on painkillers.
However, like Williamson, Clay County is similar, both areas are located in America’s Rust Belt, where de-industrialization and high unemployment fuels the deadly cycle of addiction.
Now, these lost and forgotten towns in the Rust Belt are being pumped with record amounts of opioids by large pharmaceutical firms, who then in return, have local doctors and pharmacies dish out painkillers to residents.
Yet while the DEA is finally cracking down on opioid abuse, the one question left is: why did the government allow pharmaceutical companies and pill mills to pump millions of highly addictive opioids into the Rust Belt in the first place?