Search This Blog

Sunday, March 31, 2019

CMS OKs Fla. Medicaid behavioral health housing pilot

The pilot program will provide temporary housing, tenant support and other services to people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness because of their disability.


KEY TAKEAWAYS

The waiver request was sent to CMS after Florida lawmakers in 2016 directed the state’s Agency for Healthcare Administration to seek federal approval to pay for ‘flexible services’ such as temporary housing.
In exchange for the waiver approval, Florida must follow home- and community-based services requirements for person-centered planning, conflict of interest, and home and community-based setting requirements.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has approved a Florida section 1115 pilot program that provides behavioral health services and housing to adult Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental illness, substance abuse disorders, or both.
“We are committed to supporting states that seek to test policies that are likely to improve beneficiary health because we believe that promoting independence and improving health  outcomes is in the best interests of the beneficiary and advances the fundamental objectives of the Medicaid program,” Chris Traylor, CMS’s deputy administrator and director, said in a letter this week to Beth Kidder, Florida’s deputy director of Medicaid.
“In its consideration of Florida’s MMA (Managed Medical Assistance amendment), CMS examined whether the demonstration was likely to assist in improving health outcomes, whether it would address health determinants that influence health outcomes, and whether it would incentivize beneficiaries to engage in their own healthcare and achieve better health outcomes,” Traylor said.
“CMS has determined the Florida MMA Demonstration is likely to promote Medicaid objectives, and the waiver and expenditure authorities sought are necessary and appropriate to carry out the demonstration,” he said.
The Behavioral Health and Supportive Housing Assistance Pilot will provide transitional housing, tenancy support services, mobile crisis management and self- and peer-support, along with home and community-based services to people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness because of their disability.
The waiver request was sent to CMS after Florida lawmakers in 2016 directed the state’s Agency for Healthcare Administration to seek federal approval to pay for “flexible services” such as temporary housing for people with severe mental illness or substance abuse disorders.
In exchange for the waiver approval, Florida must follow home and community-based services requirements for person-centered planning, conflict of interest, and home and community-based setting requirements.
The state must also develop performance measures within 90 days following the approval of the waiver to address the requirements of the pre-tenancy services, tenancy sustaining services, mobile crisis management and self-help/peer support, CMS said.
“By paying these costs, the Medicaid program helps vulnerable populations afford the medical care and services they need to attain and maintain health and well-being,” Traylor said.

How Johns Hopkins created a preferred skilled nursing facility network

Components of Johns Hopkins’ SNF collaborative include a rigorous process for selecting partner facilities and establishing a management framework.


KEY TAKEAWAYS

Successful SNF collaboratives boost quality and reduce costs.
Physician leadership is an essential ingredient of an effective SNF collaborative.
Health systems and hospitals seeking to create a preferred SNF network should be prepared to invest a significant amount of time and effort to the initiative.
Johns Hopkins Medicine has established a skilled nursing facility collaborative to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of postacute care for its patients.
Transferring patients to skilled nursing facilities shortens length of stay in acute care settings but low quality of care at SNFs can lead to hospital readmissions. This dynamic is reflected in a 2013 Institute of Medicine report that found postacute care accounted for 73% of the variation in Medicare spending.
“One mechanism employed to improve transitions to SNFsand reduce associated readmissions is to create a preferred provider network. Increasing the concentration of hospital discharges to higher performing facilities is associated with lower rehospitalization rates, particularly during the critical days following discharge,” Johns Hopkins staff members wrote recently for an article published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
There are three primary steps to establish a SNF collaborative, the article says.

1. SELECT APPROPRIATE SNF PARTNERS

The best SNF partners for health systems and hospitals are high-quality facilities and/or SNFs with historically high volume. In the latter case, the SNFs’ name recognition with patients and providers can be capitalized and quality can be boosted through improvement initiatives if necessary.
There are several possible quality and clinical outcome criteria for picking preferred SNF partners:
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quality star ratings and Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set measures
  • Rate of 30-day readmissions
  • Satisfaction ratings from patients and family members
  • Emergency department visits
  • Primary care follow-up within seven days of hospital discharge to the SNF setting
  • SNF impact on total cost of care

2. CRAFT THE COLLABORATIVE’S FRAMEWORK

The Johns Hopkins Medicine Skilled Nursing Facility Collaborative features a management framework that established a system-level approach to SNF partnerships based on the shared goals of improving care and reducing costs.
The framework includes three primary elements:
  • A steering committee that functions as the collaborative’s governing body was drawn from all participating Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM) players. When the collaborative was launched, the steering committed targeted three dozen SNF chains and freestanding facilities to participate in the initiative.
  • A stakeholder group was formed with broader representation from JHM, including leaders with postacute care expertise such as rehabilitation and emergency medicine. The stakeholder group also included SNF partners and the local CMS-funded Quality Improvement Organization.
  • Dedicated workgroups lead protocol-based initiatives, data management, and analytics. The initial protocol-based initiative for the collaborative was transitions of care, which featured all affiliated hospitals focusing on a harmonized approach to care transitions. Representatives on the workgroup included members of hospital leadership, Johns Hopkins HealthCare, Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients, the JHM home care division, and members of SNF leadership.

3. FOSTER PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP

Enlisting physician leaders to help guide meaningful and broad change is an essential ingredient of an effective SNF collaborative, the Journal of Hospital Medicine article says.
“When devising system-wide solutions, incorporation and respect for local processes and needs are paramount for provider engagement and behavior change. This process will likely identify gaps in understanding the postacute care patient’s experience and needs. It may also reveal practice variability and foster opportunities for provider education,” the article says.

INVESTING RESOURCES

The lead author of the journal article told HealthLeaders that JHM invested considerable resources to build an effective SNF collaborative.
“The greatest upfront investment was likely the time and effort of individuals across our organization who crafted the vision for this collaborative in alignment with the institutional priority,” said Sarah Johnson Conway, MD, medical director of the Johns Hopkins Infusion Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.
“The coordinating team had representation from population health, care management, hospital administration, health plan, and skilled nursing facility medical leadership. Once the framework was in place, initial investments went toward administrative infrastructure with project management, data and analytics, and medical oversight.”

When You Need to See a Dermatologist

You might think of seeing a skin specialist for cosmetic procedures, to freshen skin or to get rid of lines. But do you recognize the signs of problems that need the attention of a skin doctor?
Here are some of the most common skin conditions and their warning signs.
Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the United States. With millions of new cases diagnosed each year, report any suspicious new moles or a change in an existing mole. Do a monthly visual check of your skin using mirrors for hard-to-see areas using the “A-B-C-D-E” test. A mole is worrisome if it:
  • Is Asymmetrical
  • Has a Border with ragged edges
  • Has Color that’s uneven
  • Has a Diameter larger than a pencil eraser
  •  Is Elevated or raised
Another common — and persistent — skin problem is acne, with its clogged pores and pus-filled pimples. Breakouts can affect people well into their adult years. For acne that doesn’t improve with drugstore products, see a dermatologist not only to clear up skin, but also to avoid permanent scars. Because acne can affect self-esteem, don’t let your kids suffer with it. Acne may not harmlessly just run its course.
Constant redness anywhere on the face can be a sign of rosacea. You might see thin blood vessels and pimples but not the blackheads of acne. A telltale clue that this is not acne: Rosacea won’t respond to acne treatments.
Any persistent rash should be evaluated. It could be eczema with its dry, itchy patches, or the more serious psoriasis with thick plaques of silvery scales. It could even be lupus, an autoimmune disease that can cause a sunburn-like effect or thick scaly patches on the face.
More information
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on skin cancer and how to prevent it.

First-Time Generic Drug Approvals

Each year, FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) approves a wide range of new drug products. FDA provides the scientific and regulatory advice needed to bring safe, effective, high-quality generic alternatives to market, which in turn creates more affordable treatment options for patients.
“First generics” are just what they sound like—the first approval by FDA which permits a manufacturer to market a generic drug product in the United States. FDA considers first generics to be important to public health, and prioritizes review of these submissions.
Note: Approved drugs are not always available on or after the listed approval date. Please contact the listed ANDA applicant for more information about a drug product’s availability.

First-Time Generic Drug Approvals 2019*

ANDA NUMBERGENERIC NAMEANDA APPLICANTBRAND NAMEANDA APPROVAL DATEANDA INDICATION+
20208441Ambrisentan Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mgMylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Letairis (Ambrisentan) Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mg3/28/2019For the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
19208252Ambrisentan Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mgWatson Laboratories, IncLetairis (Ambrisentan) Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mg3/28/2019For the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
18210784Ambrisentan Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mgSun Pharma Global FZELetairis (Ambrisentan) Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mg3/28/2019For the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
17210058Ambrisentan Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mgZydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.Letairis (Ambrisentan) Tablets, 5 mg, 10 mg3/28/2019For the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
16211694Pyridostigmine Bromide Syrup, 60 mg/5 mLNovitium Pharma LLCMestinon (Pyridostigmine Bromide) Syrup, 60 mg/5 mL3/8/2019To improve muscle strength in patients with myasthenia gravis
15205600Levofloxacin Ophthalmic Solution, 1.5%Micro Labs Limited, IndiaIquix (Levofloxacin) Opthalmic Solution, 1.5%2/27/2019For the treatment of corneal ulcer caused by susceptible strains of the following bacteria
14208800Deferiprone Tablets, 500 mgTaro Pharmaceuticals Industries LimitedFerriprox (Deferiprone) Tablets, 500 mg2/8/2019For the treatment of patients with transfusional iron overload due to thalassemia syndromes when current chelation therapy is inadequate
13204724Sevelamer Hydrochloride Tablets, 400 mg, 800 mgGlenmark Pharmaceuticals LimitedRenagel (Sevelamer Hydrochloride) Tablets, 400 mg, 800 mg2/8/2019For the control of serum phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis
12210790Levomilnacipran Extended-Release Capsules, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mgAmneal Pharmaceuticals Company GmbHFetzima (Levomilnacipran) Extended-Release Capsules, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg2/4/2019For the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
11208702Acyclovir Cream, 5%Perrigo UK FINCO Limited PartnershipZovirax (Acyclovir) Cream, 5%2/4/2019For the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis (cold sores) in immunocompetent adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older
10208891Wixela Inhub (Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Inhalation Powder, USP), 100 mcg/50 mcg, 250 mcg/50 mcg, 500 mcg/50 mcgMylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Advair Diskus (Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Inhalation Powder, USP), 100 mcg/50 mcg, 250 mcg/50 mcg, 500 mcg/50 mcg1/30/2019For the treatment of asthma in patients aged 4 years and older; and for the 250/50 strength, for the maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
9211040Sirolimus Oral Solution, 1 mg/mLNovitium Pharma LLCRapamune (Sirolimus) Oral Solution, 1 mg/mL1/28/2019For the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years of age or older receiving renal transplants
8209822Vigabatrin Tablets USP, 500 mgTeva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Sabril (Vigabatrin) Tablets, 500 mg1/14/2019For the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (CPS) in patients 10 years of age and older who have responded inadequately to several alternative treatments
7209019Ingenol Mebutate Gel, 0.05%Perrigo UK FINCO Limited PartnershipPicato Gel (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%1/9/2019For the topical treatment of actinic keratosis
6209018Ingenol Mebutate Gel, 0.015%Perrigo UK FINCO Limited PartnershipPicato Gel (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.015%1/7/2019For the topical treatment of actinic keratosis
5208055Lurasidone Hydrochloride Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mgTorrent Pharmaceuticals LimitedLatuda (Lurasidone Hydrochloride) Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg 1/3/2019For the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder (bipolar depression) in adults
4208049Lurasidone Hydrochloride Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg and 120 mgAccord Healthcare Inc.Latuda (Lurasidone Hydrochloride) Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg1/3/2019For the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder (bipolar depression) in adults
3208031Lurasidone Hydrochloride Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg Lupin LimitedLatuda (Lurasidone Hydrochloride) Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg1/3/2019For the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder (bipolar depression) in adults
2208028Lurasidone Hydrochloride Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mgInvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Latuda (Lurasidone Hydrochloride) Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg1/3/2019For the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder (bipolar depression) in adults
1208002Lurasidone Hydrochloride Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mgAmneal Pharmaceuticals Company GmbHLatuda (Lurasidone Hydrochloride) Tablets, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg1/3/2019For the treatment of depressive episode associated with Bipolar I Disorder (bipolar depression) in adults
Note: As outlined in the Proposed Criteria for First Generic Submissions for Purposes of ANDA, certain ANDAs are deemed “first generic” for the purposes of review prioritization. In this context, a first generic application is any received ANDA: (1) That is a first-to-file ANDA eligible for 180-day exclusivity, or for which there are no blocking patents or exclusivities; and (2) for which there is no previously-approved ANDA for the drug product.
*This table reflects current data as of the date the listed approval was made. Post-approval status changes, including approved use or indications, approval date, approval status, etc. are not reflected here. To view the most current information on any ANDA listed, please check its Drugs@FDA listing.
+Due to space limitations, abbreviated indications are listed. For full indication information, please check Drugs@FDA.
To view all Generic Drug Approvals and Tentative Approvals, use the “Drug Approval Reports by Month” feature on Drugs@FDA and select “Original Abbreviated New Drug Approvals (ANDAs) by Month” for Generic Approvals or “Tentative Approvals by Month” for Tentative Approvals. The database is updated daily.

Trade group to SEC: Do away with quarterly reports for small biotechs

President Donald Trump last August asked the SEC to look into the feasibility of abolishing the quarterly reporting requirement in favor of a six-month system. The regulator recently posed this question to BIO — the largest trade organization representing biopharma — whether a less frequent reporting regime would work for its members, some of whom spend a fortune over a decade before their products hit the market… if they ever do.
BIO responded with a resounding yes. “(T)he current quarterly reporting framework places an unhealthy emphasis on meeting or exceeding short-term forecasts, which engenders an inefficient outlook on short-term results. Due to the lengthy timeline for potentially life-saving drug discovery, which averages 10-15 years, biotech companies and their investors would be better served by a less frequent (e.g. semiannual) reporting regime that prioritizes long-term value creation,” the organization said in earlier this month.

Baird’s Brian Skorney took issue with BIO’s claim that quarterly reports focus on the short-term over the long term. “A myriad of companies in the industry have shown time and again that they need to held to short term obligations and milestones or will otherwise sacrifice shareholder capital on garbage under the guise of long-term strategy. In many ways I think biotech companies are not held to a high enough standard of disclosure and at least, in some respect, mandatory quarterly filings require companies to go through the exercise of rigorously doing some internal checks and reporting those to the public. I worry that relaxing SEC disclosure standards could lead to more shenanigans as companies feel less oversight.”
Smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies, BIO suggested, should report on a “less frequent (e.g. semiannual) basis while preserving the flexibility to adopt more frequent (e.g. quarterly) reporting as they advance toward commercial stage.”
Instead, Skorney argued in favor of eliminating quarterly financial filings:
In exchange, they should be required to disclose full clinical data sets within 45 days of receipt and complete regulatory communications within 45 days of receipt. This is what we really want info-wise anyway, and frankly, companies are held to a very minimal standard in terms of rigor of these disclosures.
Since 2013, the European Commission has eradicated the requirement of quarterly reports, saying it posed an unjustified burden on small and medium-sized companies. In the United States, it has remained intact since its introduction in 1970.
The resistance to quarterly reporting in the US is hardly new.
Critics have long argued that the process is arduous, costly and detracts companies from focusing on the long term, and disincentivize firms from going public. In 2016, a coalition of influential business leaders including JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon and Blackrock’s Larry Fink, asserted that a “company should not feel obligated to provide quarterly earnings guidance – and should determine whether providing quarterly earnings guidance for the company’s shareholders does more harm than good.”
Meanwhile, supporters of quarterly reports argue that they enhance transparency, and that longer durations between reports make it increase the likelihood of insider trading.
BIO’s strategy won the endorsement of Jonah Meer, chief and CFO of Qrons — a small biotech developing a therapy for traumatic brain injury.

“While I am a believer in transparency…there is no need to have a quarterly report, which is very repetitive to prior reports and does not add much — to those who in fact read the report — a minuscule number of investors. Bear in mind there is often no analyst coverage for our type of stock — so it’s not even being produced to be analyzed by the street. A company will know if investors are looking for more info and quarterlies and would adapt on their own volition.”
For John Maxwell, CFO of drug delivery company Aquestive Therapeutics, quarterly reports set up unrealistic expectations. “What we’ve observed is that quarterly reporting can sometimes create the expectation that major company developments should happen quarter by quarter…doing semi-annual reporting would reduce the focus on quarterly numbers and put more focus on pipeline developments. That could make sense for both us and our investors.”

Saturday, March 30, 2019

Private equity sees ripe opportunity in healthcare this year

Private equity investment in healthcare has ballooned over the past decade, and experts say 2019 is poised to be another robust year, with potential ripe targets in orthopaedics and mental health and addiction treatment.
Private equity deals in healthcare in the U.S. more than doubled over the past 10 years, according to financial data firm Pitchbook. In 2008 there were 325 deals (including buyers and sellers) and in 2018 that number swelled to 788, a record number of deals representing more than $100 billion in total value.
One of the largest recent deals was private-equity firm KKR’s nearly $10 billion purchase of Envision Healthcare last year, according to Preqin. Envision provides physician services to hospitals and operates hundreds of surgery centers across the country. Another big deal was the public-to-private takeover of athenahealth by Evergreen Coast Capital and Veritas Capital for $5.7 billion in 2018.
“It looks as though 2018 was a record year for the industry, and overall the trend in deal-making has been one of strong growth — this would suggest that 2019 could be another record year unless we see a change in the underlying conditions,” Preqin spokesman William Clarke told Healthcare Dive.
The Envision deal was among the biggest leveraged buyouts ever at more than $4 billion in debt, according to Pitchbook. The practice is criticized in several respects, including that many are financed by loading a company up with mounds of debt.​
Globally, healthcare accounts for about 13% of all private equity buy-out deals, according Preqin, an industry research firm.
The deals come amid a frenzy of consolidation, both vertical and horizontal, in the healthcare industry as hospitals and insurers try to scale up to insulate themselves from a number of headwinds and disruptors such as Amazon and Apple.
M&A began to accelerate after the Affordable Care Act, as many hospitals aligned themselves with physician groups, looking for greater reach into a market. But private equity firms “provide an attractive alternative to the traditional hospital-physician alignment models,” according to a recent report from the Investment Funds team at the law firm BakerHostetler.
Private equity investors are increasingly seeking deals in areas that are highly fragmented or areas that still operate in silos and are undercapitalized, Ben Isgur, health research institute leader at PwC, told Healthcare Dive. Fragmented areas provide an opportunity for private equity firms to come in and align a number of practices on the same platform, which increases size and scale to improve leverage in negotiations with payers.
Potential highly fragmented targets include orthopaedic practices, which are likely to see a number of private equity investments over the next few years, as well as gastroenterology and urology, according to BakerHostetler.
For example, “Only 30 orthopaedic practices in the country have more than 20 physicians in a single practice,” the report notes. Private equity firms’ attraction to these practices may have increased last year after CMS changed the rules to allow total knee replacements to be performed in outpatient settings. Previously, the agency only allowed total knee replacements to be performed on Medicare beneficiaries in an inpatient-only setting.
Orthopaedics, gastroenterology and urology also are ripe with lucrative ancillary services such as surgery and imaging centers and have high use thanks to an aging population, the report notes. There are more than 5,700 ambulatory surgery centers across the U.S. that perform more than 20 million surgeries every year, according to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association. Medicare alone spent $4.3 billion on ASC services in 2016, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.
Investing in healthcare is also enticing for private equity investors as they seek to balance their investments. The healthcare sector is likely more insulated from a recession due to the aging population and demand for services, along with the projected increase in healthcare spending, according to a research report from PwC.
Another area experts are keeping an eye on for potential deals is in mental health, Isgur said.
“There is a huge need for these services and many of the providers are in small practices. The opportunity is to consolidate and capitalize and then build shared services around technology and back-office functions to create more value,” Isgur said.
Private equity investment in healthcare is not new; but like politics, healthcare is still very local, he said.
By 2008, private equity was already active in a number of areas including long-term care facilities, hospice, ambulatory surgery centers, acute care hospitals and clinical labs, according to a previous Health Affairs report.

Buying to sell

Private equity by its nature comes with controversy, with a business model based on buying for the purpose of selling for a one-time windfall profit for wealthy investors and for taking on big debt to finance the deals.
That leaves workers and patients last, critics say, and the sector’s forays into nursing homes brought those fears to the surface.
For years, unions have been critical of private equity firms in general. The American Medical Association, the nation’s prominent doctors group, is probing private equity investments into medical practices and its influence on healthcare. The report will likely be available in June, according to an AMA spokesperson.
The health of nursing home patients was put in jeopardy at facilities run by ManorCare, one of the largest nursing home operators in the country, according to a Washington Post investigation. ManorCare struggled financially when it was helmed by private-equity firm Carlyle Group and ended up filing for bankruptcy last year, nearly a decade after it was acquired by Carlyle Group.
A spate of nursing home acquisitions by private equity firms led to concerns about quality of care issues. Private equity bought up 1,900 nursing homes over the course of a decade, from 1998 to 2008, according to a GAO report from the time.
Isgur noted the controversy, pointing to the proliferation of freestanding emergency rooms in some states.
Some freestanding ERs are backed by private equity firms and may be closer and more convenient for consumers, but that convenience comes at a hefty cost. One insurer, UnitedHealth Group, has warned about that, too.

Majority of employers have no program for opioid use, suicide prevention

A majority of employers have no plans to focus on opioid abuse or suicide prevention, despite the growing rates of deaths connected to these risk factors, according to a new study.
Just 22% of employers have such a program in place or plan to implement one in 2019 to addresses these two issues, according to a recent study by Willis Towers Watson, a consulting and broking company.
“Mental health issues from opioid addiction to depression are some of the most prevalent diagnoses—and they represent not only a huge human cost, but also substantial medical expenses and losses in productivity,” Jeff Levin-Scherz, M.D., Harvard professor and health management practice co-leader for Willis Towers Watson, told FierceHealthcare.
While the survey “showed that employers are increasingly prioritizing the behavioral health of employees,” the authors “were surprised to see that the majority of employers have no plans to focus on opioid abuse (55%) or suicide prevention (63%),” Levin-Scherz said.

Data analysis finds that employees suffering from these clinical conditions tend to amass two-to-four times more medical claims and six times more emergency room visits than an average person. However, just 23% of employers said they will consider initiatives to prevent opioid abuse in 2020 or 2021 and 15% are considering suicide prevention plans.
Although not specific to suicide prevention, the data does suggest that more employers are looking to support mental health initiatives, according to the report. Although currently only 46% of employers have taken any action around mental health in 2019, 70% plan to have a program in place by 2021.
“If care for the welfare, productivity and retention of employees isn’t sufficient motivation for employers to act fast to bring adequate access to behavioral healthcare services, the financial strain of stress, anxiety, depression, suicide and substance abuse on their bottom line simply cannot be ignored,” Mandie Conforti, senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson, said in a statement.
So why the lack of initiatives? For one, Levin-Scherz noted the taboo associated for a long time around drug abuse and suicide. Plus, the issue is further complicated by the barriers of access to behavioral healthcare in the U.S., he said.
“Even as more individuals and families face behavioral health conditions, there are not enough clinicians available—and, of course, there is often a wide range in quality of care,” Levin-Scherz said.
In addition, some employers may be in denial that addiction and suicide could impact their workplace. Levin-Scherz recommends several strategies for employers to implement concerning behavioral health.
First, employers need to ensure adequate coverage and reasonable cost sharing within the healthcare plan.
“Employees, whether they work in a rural or urban environment, in the office or remotely, must have access to networks with high-quality mental healthcare providers,” he said. “Employers should be certain that provider directories accurately represent which providers are accepting new patients.”

Second, he recommended that employers should have a plan that gives members ready access to medication assisted treatment for opioid addiction, without excessive cost sharing or difficult prior authorization requirements. Third, consider incorporating in telemedicine or onsite or near-site delivery options to further remove the barriers to seeking out care.
In addition, Levin-Scherz says it is “paramount” that managers and supervisors are trained to discuss mental health with employees, along with offering an Employee Assistance Program so that employees feel like they have someone to turn to beyond their direct manager. Finally, employers may also consider launching a suicide awareness and prevention campaign, in addition to incorporating behavioral health into diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Of course, payers also play a role in changing this situation. Levin-Scherz said insurers need to offer robust coverage for behavioral healthcare and with low economic barriers to obtaining this care. Their network should include access to providers across all geographies and when needed, work with employers to integrate digital or virtual care.
“Employers recognize that they have a role to play in fostering their staffs’ financial, emotional and physical health. It’s encouraging to see that a critical mass of companies are taking the appropriate measures to get to the root of these behavioral health issues moving forward,” Levin-Scherz added.