Search This Blog

Saturday, August 31, 2019

More vaping illnesses reported, many involving marijuana

Health officials are recommending people who vape consider avoiding e-cigarettes while they investigate more cases of a breathing ailment linked to the devices.
While the cause remains unclear, officials said Friday that many reports involve products that contain THC, the mind-altering substance in marijuana.
Officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said they are looking at 215 possible cases across 25 states. All the cases involve teens or adults who have used e-cigarettes or other vaping devices. Symptoms of the disease include coughing, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting.
The CDC and Food and Drug Administration warned the public not to buy vaping products off the street. And officials recommended people concerned about the “consider refraining from using e-cigarette products.”
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said in a statement the government is “using every tool we have to get to the bottom of this deeply concerning outbreak.”
E-cigarettes generally heat a flavored nicotine solution into an inhalable aerosol. The products have been used in the U.S. for more than a decade and are generally considered safer than traditional cigarettes because they don’t create all the cancer-causing byproducts of burning tobacco.
But some vaping products have been found to contain other potentially harmful substances, including flavoring chemicals and oils used for vaping marijuana, experts say.
The mysterious illness underscores the complicated nature of the vaping market, which includes both government-regulated nicotine products and THC-based vape pens, which are considered illegal under federal law.
Eleven states and the District of Columbia allow marijuana for . THC-based products in these regulated markets are generally inspected for quality and safety, but there is a largely unregulated gray market.
On Thursday, top  in the Trump administration reiterated warnings against marijuana use by adolescents and pregnant women, emphasizing the increasing potency of the drug.

Explore further

ESC: Microbes may play a role in heart attack onset

Microorganisms in the body may contribute to destabilisation of coronary plaques and subsequent heart attack, according to late breaking research presented today at ESC Congress 2019 together with the World Congress of Cardiology.
The study found that unlike gut bacteria, the bacteria in coronary plaques were pro-inflammatory. In addition, patients with  () had different bacteria in their guts compared to patients with stable angina.
Diet, smoking, pollution, age, and medications have a major impact on cell physiology, the immune system, and metabolism. Previous research indicates that these effects are mediated by microorganisms in the intestinal tract. This study investigated the contribution of the microbiota to the instability of coronary plaques.
The study enrolled 30 patients with acute coronary syndrome and ten patients with stable angina. The researchers isolated  from faeces samples. Coronary plaque bacteria were extracted from angioplasty balloons.
Comparison of microbiota in faeces and coronary plaques revealed a different composition in the two sites. While faecal bacteria had a heterogeneous composition, and a pronounced presence of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, coronary plaques primarily contained microbes with pro-inflammatory phenotypes belonging to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria.
First author Eugenia Pisano, of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy said: “This suggests a selective retention of pro-inflammatory bacteria in , which could provoke an inflammatory response and plaque rupture.”
The analyses also revealed differences in gut microbiota between the two groups of patients. Those with acute coronary syndrome had more Firmicutes, Fusobacteria and Actinobacteria, while Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria were more abundant in those with stable angina.
Ms Pisano said: “We found a different make-up of the gut microbiome in acute and stable patients. The varying chemicals emitted by these  might affect plaque destabilisation and consequent heart attack. Studies are needed to examine whether these metabolites do influence plaque instability.”
She noted that to date, research has not convincingly shown that infections and the ensuing inflammation are directly involved in the process of plaque instability and  attack onset. As an example, antibiotics against Chlamydia Pneumoniae failed to reduce the risk of cardiac events.
But she said: “While this is a small study, the results are important because they regenerate the notion that, at least in a subset of patients, infectious triggers might play a direct role in plaque destabilisation. Further research will tell us if antibiotics can prevent cardiovascular events in certain patients.”
Ms Pisano concluded: “Microbiota in the gut and coronary plaque could have a pathogenetic function in the process of plaque destabilisation and might become a potential therapeutic target.”

Explore further

More information: The abstract “A different microbial signature in plaque and gut of patients presenting with ACS: a possible role for coronary instability” will be presented during the session Late Breaking Basic and Translational Science – Acute Coronary Syndromes and Heart failure on Saturday 31 August at 13:50 to 15:00 CEST in room Pristina – Village 3.

Joint Commission sets maternal safety standards for hospital accreditation

Starting next July, the Joint Commission will require accredited hospitals to have 13 policies in place to help prevent the likelihood of hemorrhage and severe hypertension for pregnant patients.
The new standards, which will go into effect July 1, 2020, are in response to many hospitals adopting evidence-based practices to prevent maternal mortality due to hemorrhage and hypertension, two of the most common reasons for death in pregnant women.
“There has been a lot learned about what needs to be done to reduce maternal mortality rates,” said Dr. David Baker, executive vice president for healthcare quality evaluation at the Joint Commission. “We thought it was time to take those (best practices) and turn them into requirements to ensure that all hospitals try to follow them.”
The U.S. has a higher maternal mortality rate than other developed countries, with about 700 pregnancy-related deaths occurring each year, and 60% of those are preventable.
Hospitals’ compliance with the standards will be evaluated during Joint Commission accreditation surveys, which occur every three years.
The requirements were selected based on input from the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, which has been successful in reducing maternal mortality rates through evidence-based practices in the state.
Prior to finalizing the standards, the Joint Commission also visited hospitals throughout the U.S. to get their feedback. Baker said hospitals were overwhelmingly positive.
The American Hospital Association is also supportive of the new requirements.
“These standards play a vital role for pregnant and postpartum women, as well as their families,” Thomas Nickels, executive vice president of the AHA, wrote in a letter to the Joint Commission. “Maternal hemorrhage risk and severe hypertension/preeclampsia are two of the most common complications that occur in pregnant and postpartum women. Ensuring that hospitals and providers are trained and prepared to diagnose, manage and effectively treat such complications is critical.”
Some of the standards are providing education to all staff who treat pregnant and postpartum patients about the organization’s hemorrhage and hypertension procedures; conducting drills at least once per year to determine issues with ongoing quality improvement work and offering education to patients and their families about symptoms of postpartum hemorrhage and severe hypertension.
Baker said the Joint Commission attempted to select standards that all hospitals, no matter their resources, could comply with. For instance, the Joint Commission opted not to include a component of the safety bundles developed by the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health related to counting blood loss. Baker said there was concern that it would be too difficult for small hospitals to comply with.
“We see this as an ongoing process,” he said. “We want to make sure that all hospitals can meet these new requirements, but we will continue to look at what we can do as hospitals get more experience with these things. They might be able to do additional things in the future.”
In the coming months, the Joint Commission plans to host webinars with its accredited hospitals to explain the changes in more depth. Additionally, the Joint Commission is offering the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative as resources for hospitals to successfully comply with the standards.

Publicly insured more likely to drop off liver transplant waitlist, study finds

Cancer patients with public health insurance were more likely to drop off the waitlist for a liver transplant than patients with private insurance, according to a study published Friday in JAMA Network Open.
Among 705 patients with a common type of liver cancer waiting for a transplant at the University of California, San Francisco, 46.7% of patients with public insurance dropped off the waiting list over a seven-year study period.
That compared with 28.7% of patients insured by Kaiser Permanente and 33.8% by other private insurers despite similar tumor-related characteristics,according to the study. In total, 246 patients dropped off the wait-list during the period that lasted from Jan. 1, 2010 to Dec. 31, 2016.
“When we think about patients with liver cancer who are listed for transplants, we typically think about the main reasons they don’t make it to transplant being clinical characteristics,” explained study author Dr. Neil Mehta, an associate professor medicine at UCSF. “But this study suggested that even though patients in all the different insurance categories had similar clinical characteristics, they had very different rates of dropping off the waitlist, specifically patients with public insurance.”
Of the 705 patients in the study, about a quarter of patients dropped off the waiting list specifically because of tumor progression or death. That included 19.2% of patients in the sample with Kaiser Permanente insurance, 26.1% of patients with private insurance and 33.2% with public insurance.
The study found that 416 patients received liver transplants from deceased donors, including 65.6% of patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance, 63.1% with other private insurance and 44.2% with public insurance. Others may have gotten liver transplants from live donors or a center outside of the study.
Researchers speculated that socioeconomic factors were to blame for public insurance being associated with a higher risk of dropping off the waitlist. Patients on Medicaid were more likely to be poor and unemployed and lack stable housing and social support, which could impact the patient’s ability to attend follow up appointments, for example.
Mehta explained that to remain eligible for transplant, liver cancer patients must get imaging done every three months to make sure the tumor stays within transplant criteria. Organizations such as Kaiser Permanente have care coordination programs to help patients navigate the testing and challenges that come with being on the waitlist, while publicly insured patients may not have that benefit, he said.
“Our main hypothesis is that if we can actually improve healthcare coordination delivery for these patients, that can hopefully reduce these disparities,” Mehta said.
In an emailed statement, Dr. Joanna Ready, chair of the Kaiser Permanente Liver Transplant Advisory Board for Northern California, said Kaiser Permanente ensures patients with chronic conditions have timely access to care.
“For our liver transplant patients, we provide comprehensive pre- and post-transplant services, including nurse coordinators, physicians, and sub-specialty care, such as radiology, oncology, and cardiology. This ensures critical conditions such cancer are identified early and managed efficiently throughout the transplant journey,” she said.
Half of the patients in the study sample had Kaiser Permanente insurance because UCSF has a contract with Kaiser Permanente in Northern California, but that organization did not sponsor the study, Mehta said.

Sanders proposes canceling $81 billion U.S. medical debt

U.S. presidential contender Bernie Sanders proposed a plan on Saturday to cancel $81 billion in existing past-due medical debt for Americans, but offered no details on how it would be financed.
Sanders, an independent U.S. senator from Vermont, said in a statement that under his plan, the government would negotiate and pay off past-due medical bills that have been reported to credit agencies. The proposal, he said, would also repeal some elements of the 2005 Bankruptcy reform bill and allow other existing and future medical debt to be discharged.
“In the United States of America, your financial life and future should not be destroyed because you or a member of your family gets sick,” said Sanders. “That is unacceptable. I am sick and tired of seeing over 500,000 Americans declare bankruptcy each year because they cannot pay off the outrageous cost of a medical emergency or a hospital stay.”
According to Sanders, medical debt is the leading cause of consumer bankruptcy, with more than half a million Americans filing due to medical expenses each year. He said the 2005 Bankruptcy reform bill made it difficult to discharge medical debt by imposing strict means tests and eliminated fundamental consumer protections for Americans.

“It also trapped families with medical debt in long-term poverty, mandated that they pay for credit counseling before filing for bankruptcy, and increased the need for expensive legal services when filing a case for medical bankruptcy,” the senator said.
Sanders is seeking the Democratic nomination, along with more than a dozen other candidates, for the right to challenge Republican President Donald Trump in November 2020.

Dorian update — Carnival Corp

Weather Update – August 31, 2019 | 12:00  PM (ET)
Our Fleet Operations Center in Miami is actively monitoring Hurricane Dorian’s potential impact on the departures listed below. Given that storms can be so uncertain, this information reflects our plan for these sailings based on the current forecast.
As the safety of our guests and crew is our number one priority, we will continue to keep an eye on the storm and factor in guidance from the National Hurricane Center, U.S. Coast Guard and the local port authorities to provide timely updates as more information becomes available.
The following homeports and ships remain under watch:
CHARLESTON
Carnival Sunshine 09/02/19 – No change to itinerary, we plan to operate as scheduled. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL3 to CRUISE (278473).
FORT LAUDERDALE (PORT EVERGLADES)
Carnival Magic 08/31/19 – No change to itinerary; we plan to operate as scheduled. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL9 to CRUISE (278473).
JACKSONVILLE
Carnival Ecstasy 08/31/19 – No change to itinerary; we plan to operate as scheduled.
Carnival Ecstasy 09/05/19 – Still evaluating.  Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL12 to CRUISE (278473).
There is a possibility Carnival Ecstasy will not be able to return to Jacksonville on Thursday.  If the port is closed, the ship will be in position to dock as soon as the authorities have reopened the port.
PORT CANAVERAL
Port Canaveral is expected to be closed on Sunday through the middle of next week.  We are optimistic the port will reopen by Thursday.
Carnival Breeze 08/31/19 – No change to itinerary; we plan to operate as scheduled. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL10 to CRUISE (278473). 
Carnival Liberty 09/02/19 – This cruise is cancelled.  Guests will receive a full refund of their cruise fare and any pre-purchased items.  More details to follow in our email.
Carnival Elation 09/02/19 – This cruise will now operate as a 2 day sailing, departing September 5th and returning September 7th with a visit to Nassau.  Guests who sail will receive a pro-rated refund of their cruise fare and any pre-purchased beverage and Wi-Fi packages. Guests who wish to cancel will receive a future cruise credit for the full amount of their cruise fare.  An email with additional details will follow.
PORTMIAMI
Carnival Conquest – 08/31/19 – No change to itinerary; we plan to operate as scheduled. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL8 to CRUISE (278473).
Carnival Sensation 08/31/19 – We will now visit Grand Turk on 9/2, Half Moon Cay on 9/3 and Nassau on 9/4. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL7 to CRUISE (278473).
Carnival Victory 9/02/19 – This cruise will now operate as a 2 day cruise departing Wednesday, 9/4 with one port of call, to be determined. Guests who sail will receive a pro-rated refund of their cruise fare and any pre-purchased beverage and Wi-Fi packages. Guests who wish to cancel will receive a future cruise credit for the full amount of their cruise fare.  An email with additional details will follow.
Carnival Horizon 09/01/19 – The ship will be docking this evening to give guests the opportunity to disembark in anticipation of a port closure on Sunday.  Although officials are requiring the ship to depart tonight, we are seeking approval to remain docked so we can operate tomorrow’s embarkation.  This decision is expected at 5:30 PM today. Embarking guests will not be able to board the ship Saturday evening.  Please refer to our email for more information.  Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL5 to CRUISE (278473).
TAMPA
Carnival Paradise 08/31/19 – Please disregard your arrival appointment and make plans to arrive at the cruise terminal between 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM.  All guests must be on board by 1:30 PM. We will sail shortly after on our scheduled itinerary. Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL11 to CRUISE (278473).
Carnival Miracle 09/01/19 –This sailing will now operate as an 8-day sailing, departing on Saturday evening.  Kindly disregard your arrival appointments and make plans to arrive at the cruise terminal between 7:00 PM – 10:00 PM.  We will sail shortly after on our scheduled itinerary.  Guests who cannot travel on the extended duration, may cancel and receive a future cruise credit. Please contact
1-800-CARNIVAL to let us know if you are not traveling.  Please sign up for text alerts by texting CCL4 to CRUISE (278473).
Pre-purchased Carnival shore excursions for cancelled ports will be automatically refunded to your onboard Sail & Sign® account.
We sincerely apologize for the disruption caused by Hurricane Dorian.  We thank our guests for their patience and understanding while we navigate through the uncertainty the storm is causing.
We will post another update by 2:00 PM (ET) Saturday.
DEPARTED VOYAGES
Carnival Liberty 08/30/10 – This cruise will return on Thursday, 9/5.  In addition to Nassau, we have added visits to Costa Maya and Cozumel.
Carnival Victory 8/30/19 – This cruise will return on Wednesday, 9/4.  In addition to Key West, we have added a visit to Progreso on Monday.

Pharmacogenetic test makers cheer UnitedHealth coverage; other payers balk

UnitedHealthcare’s decision this month to cover genetic tests designed to predict a patient’s response to mental health medications has injected a dose of optimism for the companies that sell them, coming after the FDA issued a broad warning about unapproved claims made by some tests.
The insurance giant’s policy on pharmacogenetic testing will, starting in October, open up United’s 27 million individual and group clients to companies including Myriad Genetics and Genomind, which sell tests measuring a patient’s compatibility​ with antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs.
Executives at both companies predict the decision will bring in other payers that are, for now, on the sidelines.
By covering genetic tests for antidepressants, UnitedHealth is betting on a technology that the FDA suggests is still backed by shaky evidence.
A 2018 FDA notice asked individual companies to stop claiming their tests can predict which drugs a patient will respond to. In April, it threatened regulatory action against one, Inova Genetics Laboratory, hitting it with a warning letter.
“The relationship between DNA variations and the effectiveness of antidepressant medication has never been established,” the FDA said in a notice updated in April.
In its rationale for covering the tests, UnitedHealth cited trials, including one sponsored by Myriad, that showed patients had better treatment responses and remission rates when their treatment was guided by genetic tests. But crucially, the symptoms of those patients did not improve any more than a control group who received treatment as usual.
“I wouldn’t say there’s no evidence it works,” said James Potash, director of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University who said he is not affiliated with either test maker. “It’s just the evidence at this point is still weak.”
“I’ve been concerned that the hype around pharmacogenetics, at least for depression, has gotten out ahead of the data,” Potash said.
Anthem, which provides coverage to nearly 24 million individuals and employers, says tests are “investigational and not medically necessary,” according to a company spokesperson.
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Federal Employee Program, which covers two-thirds of government workers and their families, says there isn’t enough proof the genetic tests actually improve patient health.
Medicare does not have a national coverage determination for pharmacogenetic testing for psychotropics. A CMS spokesperson told MedTech Dive regional administrators can make exceptions for individual cases. The agency would not comment on whether Medicare or Medicaid has plans to make determinations in the future.
Myriad’s GeneSight test has an average selling price of $2,000. Genomind’s test was listed at $1,886 in a 2016 contract allowing federal agencies to order it.
Still, test makers say the decision by the nation’s largest private carrier gives them a chance to show the tests have value.
UnitedHealth is typically one of the last insurers to cover new products, Shawn Patrick O’Brien, CEO of Genomind, told MedTech Dive, predicting its rivals will follow suit.
“We expect this to be a tipping point for other major payers,” he said, “because they don’t want to be uncompetitive in the marketplace.” Genomind has discussed coverage with Anthem, Blue Cross and Blue Shield and at least one other payer, he said.
Myriad, which is also courting Anthem, is pursuing more business with pharmacy benefit managers and employers. In July it announced GeneSight would be a covered benefit by the PBM for Kroger, the nation’s largest grocer, and that an unnamed Fortune 50 employer would begin covering it in 2020.
Myriad CEO Mark Capone said on the company’s recent earnings call it is in “active dialogue” with Anthem, the biggest Blue Cross Blue Shield plan and second biggest private plan by revenue after UnitedHealthcare.
New contracts with payers could offset declining revenue from the test for Myriad. Revenue from GeneSight fell $12.3 million from the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, to June 30, 2019, according to SEC filings. Revenue from the test fell 15% in June alone.
Capone attributed the drop in sales to eliminating components of the test measuring patients’ compatibility with pain relievers and ADHD drugs. Those tests did not have as much evidence backing them up, he said, and “a few payers expressed similar views.”  “[W]e wanted to eliminate any potential hurdles” for coverage of the psychotropics test, Capone said.
Both Myriad and Genomind have said they are working with the FDA to make sure they comply.
In response to an FDA request, in August Myriad proposed changes to how it reports test results, even though “we continue to disagree the changes to the tests are required,” Capone said on the company’s fourth quarter earnings call. The company submitted clinical evidence for its test earlier in the year, he said.
Genomind has doubled its counseling staff to help doctors interpret test results instead of listing the genetic compatibility of drugs directly in the results.