Thursday on the RealClearPolitics podcast, Carl Cannon talks to RCP contributor J. Peder Zane about his latest article on the legacy media's failure to ask the right questions about obviously aging President Biden: New Year Offers Legacy Media a Chance for Redemption
"As I was thinking about the real failures that have been exposed in the mainstream coverage of the Biden White House in particular, the Wall Street Journal came out with a story that showed basically what we all knew. Not only had Biden been diminished for years, but the import of their reporting was getting people on the record to say what people close to Biden did, not only to cover this up but to govern in spite of the president's challenges," Zane explained.
"The fact that many of our colleagues in the legacy media, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR, and CNN, did not pursue this story at all and, in fact, worked to dismiss it and go after those who suggested the president was diminished is a huge scandal."
"But the hope that you've instilled in me, Carl, is that I think there's a chance for those same mainstream outlets -- who have phenomenal reporting shops -- to redeem themselves somewhat by pursuing this story of the effort to rule in Biden's name," he continued.
Carl Cannon presents the big question this raises: "Has Biden been running the country, or have these other people? If so, who? And by what right do they have to do that? What your column explores is the role of the media in, instead of exposing this, sort of covering it up. Is that too strong a term?"
"I think they absolutely were," Zane said. "The greatest evidence for that is that I don’t think the Wall Street Journal story was any surprise to people who read many of the links at RealClearPolitics or stories we’ve written at RealClear Investigations. This was not a secret, that this man was diminished. Certainly, when he was forced out of the race after his bumbling and stumbling -- to put it nicely -- debate performances, it was clear there was a problem. He was removed from the ticket not because of his policies but because of his diminished capacity."
"One point I didn’t make in my column is that because the media isn’t holding Democrats to account, it adds to the super-partisan nature of our politics," Zane further stated. "If they do nothing about this, it’s very likely that Republicans may feel the need to investigate what went on. That is, by its nature, partisan and political."
"One of the reasons, among many, that we’re so divided is that neither party wants to hold its own to account. When the press doesn’t hold people to account, politicians jump into the breach. If we had a media doing its job, we’d be a little less divided -- if they were doing it fairly. Hold Trump to account, totally, but also hold the other side."
"Look at how they covered Trump. Numerous stories about invoking the 25th Amendment over nothing. He’s a vigorous person. I don’t think Nancy Pelosi is the most articulate person in the world, but nobody can look at that 84-year-old woman and say she’s not capable of doing her job," he said. "Some older people are capable; some aren’t. It’s a case-by-case thing. But when you look at what they did when Trump maybe stumbled down a step once, and you compare it to how they covered up for Biden, it’s glaringly obvious. The contrast is so apparent."
"That’s what keeps coming out of all this -- it’s so obvious, and they’re so bad at it," he continued. "It’s like the emperor’s new clothes. You have these progressive elites seeing reality in a way that the rest of the country isn’t. Don’t forget, in February 2024, there was an ABC poll in which a vast majority of Democrats said Biden was too old to run for re-election."
"This wasn't an open secret," Cannon added. "It was only a secret among the Washington press corps!"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.