Search This Blog

Sunday, May 5, 2019

Clock is Ticking Faster for a Patient Turned Medical Disruptor

Onno Faber, a 36-year-old tech entrepreneur, stands straight up in the center of a modest living room, his shoeless feet planted in the gray striped rug. He looks trustingly at the music teacher who faces him, flashing her his frequent, accepting smile. Then he takes a breath, lifts his clear tenor voice, and sings.
Tomorrow, Onno will be video conferencing with parents of children who have rare diseases, to pitch them on his new tech platform to propel unconventional medical research. Today, he is far away from all that, as his voice reverberates through this little San Francisco room, lifting it up and away from the desperate streets of the Tenderloin neighborhood below. The notes vibrate in his wavy blond hair and green eyes, and in the tumor that’s growing quickly on his right hearing nerve — the only hearing nerve he has left. Onno is hearing the sound fill his body while he still can, before neurofibromatosis takes the other nerve away.
There comes a moment in any quest when it pivots from idea to reality. The blueprint is sketched, the parts are assembled, and someone hits the ignition — and with that, the idea is no longer in a safe, controlled space. Other people are watching now, influencing it, invested in it. The transition is equal parts exciting and scary. There is no turning back now.
Onno has hit that moment in two quests at once, one professional and one personal. Professionally, he is working apace to build an online application that will disrupt and accelerate the development of drugs for rare diseases. Personally, he is striving to use that same technology, along with his genetic data, to find a treatment that will prevent him from becoming deaf, blind, and unable to walk, before it’s too late.
Both efforts began a year ago, when 150 biologists and informaticians convened for a weekend hackathon in San Francisco to search Onno’s genetic data for clues to the cause of his tumors. (NEO.LIFE has been following the story since then; you can read the first episode here.)
Onno, a Netherlands native living in the Bay Area, had hatched the plan with his tech-industry friends. Their basic idea was to use powerful computer analytics on patients’ data to identify new treatments for their neglected diseases. Since then it has evolved into a fast-growing startup company that just raised $3 million in seed funding. It has registered 150 patients using its Web platform. And it’s collaborating with researchers at the National Cancer Institute to track pain symptoms in people with a type of neurofibromatosis called NF1. It is time for Onno’s idea to be tested.
The company, called RDMD, provides patients an online “locker” in which to store their entire medical record. Rather than wrestling with copious binders and CDs, chasing documents scattered across multiple hospitals and clinics, they can keep everything immediately accessible. They can easily share those records with rare-disease specialists, whom RDMD will help them find. And in time, they should be able to use RDMD to arrange for new medical tests.
RDMD is one of many emerging companies aiming to mine data for new insights about health and to personalize treatments for individual patients’ mutations. Yet it is distinguished by, among other features, its specificity. The platform launched with a setup devoted to Onno’s form of neurofibromatosis, NF2, which causes tumors to grow on the nerves that enable hearing and balance. For people with that diagnosis, RDMD’s platform tracks records such as hearing tests and radiology reports. Eventually, RDMD will scale up to serve patients with other rare diseases, as well, and the records it holds will be tailored to their needs.
By keeping specific data for each rare disease, on everything from drug responses to everyday symptoms, and by forging relationships with patients with those diagnoses, RDMD could make itself a one-stop partner for any pharmaceutical company that might research a treatment. Onno calls it “patient-accelerated drug development.”
One mother calls RDMD “exactly what we’ve needed.”
“If the data is not in the hands of the individual patients, it is not very easy to get access to it,” he says. Empowering patients to upload and house their own data is “going to liberate it, because patients, of course, want to contribute to whatever helps drive research forward.”
Already, around 15 patients have used RDMD to consult with a specialist located far from their homes. One father in Israel used it to consult with specialists in Los Angeles, Boston, and Paris before deciding whether to proceed with a risky surgery for his 10-year-old daughter, who has NF2.
And already, pharmaceutical companies have approached RDMD about tapping its data for research, says Onno’s cofounder, Nancy Yu, who previously led corporate development at 23andMe. Some, however, have wanted to do it the old way, treating the information as proprietary.
“We’ve already had partners who are willing to throw hundreds of thousands of dollars at us, but they want exclusive rights to that data, and we’re like: there’s no way,” she says. “We’re working for the patients first. … Especially in rare [diseases], you can’t afford to have these data silos. That’s been a thing of the past.”

Onno has personally promised patients that they will control their medical data. In May, he stood in front of several dozen patients, and parents of patients, at the Children’s Tumor Foundation NF Forum in Atlanta and told them that they will have the opportunity to opt their own records in or out of any study hosted on RDMD. In June, he promised a group called NF Moms Rock, via video conference, the same thing.
“You accept that responsibility by going out with it and presenting it to patients and raising the money,” Onno says. “That’s the moment when you are officially committing to the problem. … It’s just a point of no return.”
Onno is simultaneously making a watershed choice for himself: to try a drug that isn’t approved for NF2, in hopes of shrinking the tumor in his brain. In the same month this spring when he raised RDMD’s seed funding and got his green card to remain in the U.S., Onno received MRI results that confirmed the tumor had grown 35 percent in the past six months.
It was Onno’s quest for data that led him to decide on this new drug. A genome analysis that Onno had before last year’s hackathon showed that he had a mutation on chromosome 7 that could be contributing to his particular case of NF2. And there is a drug that can essentially patch that mutation. It’s called lapatinib, and it’s typically used to treat breast cancer. But it’s not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for NF2, so even though doctors can prescribe it, health insurers are not obliged to cover it.
The price tag for Onno’s prescription runs an estimated $10,000 a month.His doctors urged him to get the new MRIs to strengthen his case for insurance coverage, by showing that the tumor on his right hearing nerve was growing quickly. The MRI results have confirmed that fact, and his insurance finally will cover the drug. He expects to start taking it soon.
Onno marks the changes in his condition not by everyday increments, but by events, and the decision to try lapatinib is another milestone. “That makes this very real again,” he says. “Like: oh fuck, I might get these pills for the first time.”
Onno feels pretty much the same from day to day — except that he notices his balance getting a little worse, especially in the dark, on uneven pavement. Lapatinib will probably make him feel worse. Its side effects typically include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, sleeplessness, and painful, peeling skin on the hands and feet. But he wants to try it while his tumor is still fairly small; it’s about a centimeter across. He wants to have time to try something else if lapatinib doesn’t work. It’s a logical choice, not an emotional one, he says: “It’s like a calculator, and you do what the calculator tells you.”
Whether lapatinib works for Onno is just as unknown as whether RDMD will thrive as a business.
Chris Garabedian, founder of the biopharma accelerator Xontogeny, who is not involved with RDMD, says a critical factor will be whether the startup offers a unique resource to the pharmaceutical industry. “We haven’t seen a lot of great examples of how companies have been able to monetize or create great value from just the collection even of comprehensive data sets,” he explains. To change that, RDMD needs to serve as a partner to drug companies in designing studies, building on deep and indispensable knowledge of each disease.
“If RDMD says, ‘We understand NF patients better than anybody. We have a database of them and real-time access to them. We have not only genetic information but natural history, drugs they’ve been on. We actually understand what endpoints you should be capturing in your clinical trial, and we can help you shape your clinical protocol,’ … that becomes probably the strongest value proposition that I’ve heard,” Garabedian says. To get there, he cautions, the company has to use its seed funding wisely, to land a significant research contract and demonstrate clear value before it needs its next infusion of money.
Onno and Nancy understand that RDMD has to deliver that kind of value. They say they’ve built the platform to comply with FDA regulations so that the data it holds can be used to measure the performance of drugs through clinical trials. They hope to provide patients access to tests and services that are hard for individuals to arrange, such as volumetric tumor studies—special analyses of high-resolution MRI scans that calculate the three-dimensional growth of a tumor over time. And RDMD is finalizing a contract with a lab that will sequence the genomes of RDMD users.
About 15 patients on the platform already have said they want the genome analysis and are prepared to pay the $2,000 cost. When that’s done, it will make it possible to do something that Onno has been pursuing for a year — to mine a bigger set of genomes for discoveries about the possible causes of NF2, building on the clues that emerged from his own genome at the first hackathon. He is planning a second hackathon for this fall.
“We have this opportunity to discover all of the things we don’t know yet,” he says.
Sheila Cohoon, a leader of the NF Moms Rock group who lives in Clinton Township, Michigan, calls RDMD “exactly what we’ve needed.” Her 9-year-old son, Nic, developed NF1 as an infant and suffers from its associated learning disabilities and low muscle tone. But Cohoon adds a warning for Onno as he develops this rich online resource: “He has to get the security to be bulletproof. Every day you’re hearing about how somebody’s hacked into this or security has broken on that. … People are still scared of it.”
Around the time of the first hackathon, and two years after getting diagnosed with NF2, Onno started taking singing lessons with teacher Emily Thebaut. Even as a child he wished he could sing, he says, but the pursuit seemed too “vulnerable.” Then he learned he had a disease that would probably make him deaf, on a timetable no one can predict. His first tumor took the hearing in his left ear. He figured he’d better start singing now.
There is so much going on now, in both Onno’s business and his illness, that when he talks the details spill out of his mouth as if he almost doesn’t know what to say first or next. “It’s good,” he says. But, for the first time since last summer’s hackathon, there’s a hint of hesitation in his voice.
“It’s like a calculator, and you do what the calculator tells you.”
Onno sets those concerns aside at his singing lesson, as Emily warms him up with scales. Near the bottom of his range, he giggles: “Sorry, nervous laugh.” She pushes him one note further.
With his right hand on his belly, he breathes deeply. Band-Aids wrap around four fingers on that hand, where he tore them up at the rock climbing gym the day before. His socks, a festival of multicolored polka-dots, actually match today, unlike usual.
Onno sings with the same openness and eagerness to learn that he brings to genomics and biotech business, laughing with each error that leads to a lesson. Emily has urged him to sing publicly, but he’s not in this to perform. He practices songs while walking the streets of San Francisco. Sometimes he gets quieter when someone passes, sometimes he brushes aside self-consciousness and carries on. He likes when that happens.
“When it works there is a mode of not thinking,” he says about singing. “It’s very liberating, very free, like you don’t care about anything, you’re just getting it out there.”
Free the voice, free the spirit, free the data.
Emily completes the warmup, and it’s time for Onno to choose a song. He calls up the lyrics on a digital tablet, holds it aloft, and sings:
“In your dreams, whatever they be,
dream a little dream of me.”

American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Meeting: Highlights

The annual meeting of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) was held in Washington, DC last week, with literally hundreds of abstracts and presentations. Here’s a look at some of the highlights.
Children with X-linked MTM Breathe on Their Own after Gene Therapy
Researchers with Audentes TherapeuticsHopital Armand Trousseau in Paris, UCLA Medical CenterChildren’s Hospital of Chicago and several other institutions, presented data from a Phase I/II clinical trial of gene therapy in X-linked Myotubular Myopathy (XLMTM). XLMTM is a rare monogenic disease caused by mutations in the MTM1 gene, which codes for myotubularin, which is a protein needed for development and function of skeletal muscle. The disease results in extreme muscle weakness, respiratory failure and early death. Of the nine boys who received the gene therapy, all have improved neuromuscular function, most can sit on their own and four can now breathe on their own without ventilators. Principal investigator Perry Shieh, a neurologist at UCLA, said the boys “have gone from nothing to something. Time will tell how much that something will be.”
The gene therapy is AT132, which delivers functional copies of the MTM1 gene to skeletal muscle cells.
MaxCyte Presented Data on CARMA Trial in Cancer
Gaithersburg, Md.-based MaxCyte presented data on its CARMA drug candidate, MCY-M11, a mesothelin-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), which is in a Phase I clinical trial in mesothelin-expression solid tumors at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Washington University in St. Louis.
The CARMA platform is noted for its rapid manufacturing and delivery capabilities without a viral component, which was also a significant aspect of the presentation. “The advancement of our first CARMA clinical trial, which is consistently showing the feasibility of our rapid manufacturing process, is significant for MaxCyte and the application of our technology,” stated Claudio Dansky Ullmann, MaxCyte’s chief medical officer. “Development of a cell therapy with application in solid tumors is impactful for patients with unmet needs in a variety of cancers and we look forward to further advancing this program.”

Moderna Presented Research from 7 mRNA-based Therapies, and 5 Oral Presentations
Moderna always has a lot of irons in the fire and they presented research on many of them at the meeting. The data included preclinical research in ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTC) in collaboration with the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; maple syrup urine disease (MSUD), also in collaboration with Penn; arginase-1 (ARG1) deficiency in collaboration with the University of California, Los Angeles Department of Surgery and Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology; Factor VIII deficiency (hemophilia A), in collaboration with Seattle Children’s Research Institute; and several other programs.
“mRNA medicines have the potential to treat the underlying cause of many metabolic diseases, and may offer important advantages over conventional gene and enzyme replacement therapies for eligible patients,” stated James M. Wilson, director of the Gene Therapy Program at Penn. “This includes the potential to develop controlled, dose-dependent and transient treatments that may benefit infants and children with these disorders and patients with diseases that are not addressable with current viral-based approaches.”
Translate Bio Presented mRNA Therapies in Metabolic Disorders
Translate Bio presented “Treatment of Metabolic Disorders Using Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP)-Encapsulated Messenger RNA Therapeutics (MRT).” The presentation summarized data from research in three mouse models of metabolic disorders including ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency, arginosuccinate synthetase (ASS1) deficiency (citrullinemia) and methylmalonic acidemia (MMA).
“We have engineered our mRNA therapeutic (MRT) platform to deliver mRNA that codes for the missing enzymes in several metabolic disorders,” stated Frank DeRosa, Translate Bio’s senior vice president of research and process development. “These data demonstrate the potential broad applicability of the MRT platform to treat various genetic disorders using our proprietary liver delivery technology.”

Homology Medicines Discusses Gene Therapy Platform
Homology Medicines discussed its manufacturing platform, including serum-free suspension transfection, which is both scalable and optimized to manufacture its adeno-associated virus vectors (AAVHSCs). Specifically, its AAVHSC15 vector showed an 18-fold decrease in phenylalanine compared to an AAV5 vector carrying the identical DNA construct in the phenylketonuria (PKU) murine model.
“We have a great sense of urgency to advance our gene therapy and gene editing programs with the goal of bringing transformative treatments and potential cures to patients with rare genetic diseases,” stated Albert Seymour, Homology’s chief scientific officer. “We are pleased to share the progress that we have made across our PKU and MLD development programs, as well as demonstrate the scalability, quality and superiority of our manufacturing process for our human-derived AAVHSCs. We are carrying this momentum forward in our IND-enabling studies in MLD and in our gene editing program for PKU and look forward to starting our Phase I/II pheNIX trial in adults with PKU and reporting initial clinical data this year.”

Neurocrine, Voyager Parkinson’s Phase 1 at American Academy of Neurology

  • Results Confirm the Posterior Trajectory as an Additional Surgical Delivery Route for VY-AADC in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
  • Treatment with VY-AADC Improved Good ON Time (ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia) by 1.7 Hours and Reduced OFF Time by 2.2 Hours at 12 Months in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: NBIX) and Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: VYGR) today announced Phase I trial results for VY-AADC from eight patients with Parkinson’s disease who participated in the open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VY-AADC and to further assess the posterior (i.e., from the back of the head) surgical delivery approach. These Phase I results are being presented today as a poster presentation at the 2019 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting. Parkinson’s disease is a chronic, progressive and debilitating neurodegenerative disorder that affects approximately one million people in the U.S.1
Treatment with VY-AADC improved good ON time (ON time without troublesome dyskinesia) by 1.7 hours from baseline and reduced OFF time by 2.2 hours at 12 months from baseline in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exploratory analyses in four of the eight patients with low or no dyskinesia or absence of impulse control disorder (ICD) at baseline demonstrated a greater improvement in motor function including a 3.2-hour improvement in good ON time from baseline to 12 months. Infusions of VY-AADC were well tolerated with no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported. These Phase I results show that the posterior trajectory is an additional surgical delivery route in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
“The results from this Phase I trial in patients with Parkinson’s disease provide further evidence that VY-AADC administration can allow neurons in the brain to convert levodopa to dopamine and improve motor function,” said Eiry Roberts, M.D., Chief Medical Officer at Neurocrine Biosciences. “The results from this trial confirm previous data from a separate, ongoing Phase I study demonstrating that increased coverage of the putamen with VY-AADC leads to an increase in AADC enzyme activity and improvements in motor function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease – with less need for oral levodopa medication.”

AUA’19: Clinical guidance for radiation therapy after prostatectomy

The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the American Urological Association (AUA) today announced updates to their joint clinical guideline on adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy in patients with and without evidence of prostate cancer recurrence to include new published research related to adjuvant radiotherapy.
The Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline (available online in the Journal of Urologyand in Practical Radiation Oncology was amended as follows:
  • Guideline Statement 2 was modified to account for the latest data from three randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, including new long-term data from the ARO 96-02 trial, which was incorporated to update the existing evidence base.
  • Statement 2: Patients with adverse pathologic findings including seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical margins, and extraprostatic extension should be informed that adjuvant radiotherapy, compared to radical prostatectomy only, reduces the risk of biochemical (PSA) recurrence, local recurrence, and clinical progression of cancer. They should also be informed that the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on subsequent metastases and overall survival is less clear; one of three randomized controlled trials addressing these outcomes indicated a benefit, but the other two trials did not demonstrate a benefit. However, these two trials were not designed to identify a significant reduction in metastasis or death with adjuvant radiotherapy.
  • Guideline Statement 9 is a new guideline statement written to include outcome data from two randomized controlled trials (RTOG 9601 and GETUG-AFU 16), which evaluate the effects of hormonal therapy on overall survival, and on biochemical and clinical progression among patients who received salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy. Based on findings from these randomized controlled trials, it was concluded there was sufficiently strong evidence overall to encourage hormonal therapy to be offered to patients who are candidates for salvage radiotherapy. When offered, the clinician must provide information about benefits and harms associated with this therapy, particularly discussing the improved freedom from disease progression documented in both trials, and improved overall survival as reported in RTOG 9601.
  • Statement 9: Clinicians should offer hormonal therapy with radiotherapy to patients who are candidates for salvage radiation therapy. Ongoing research may someday allow personalized selection of hormonal or other therapies within patient subsets.
In addition to the guideline statements, new information related to genomic classifiers, as predictors of treatment effectiveness, was added to the guideline future research needs. Further study in this area is needed to determine whether a genomic classifier is predictive of outcomes in a yet to be treated patient, and whether it is predictive for efficacy of a particular treatment.
“Evidence from three, well-established randomized trials now confirm significant improvements in biochemical recurrence-free survival among patients with adverse pathological features with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy,” said Ian Thompson, MD, co-chair of the guideline panel and professor and chairman of the urology division at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, Texas. “Our expectation is this guideline is fully aligned to the latest science and provides physicians with a relevant blueprint for the use of radiotherapy after prostatectomy.”
“As research in prostate cancer evolves and improves, data continue to accumulate in support of radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. We now know that radiotherapy and the combination of hormone therapy with radiation, following radical prostatectomy, have contributed to even more favorable outcomes for patients than seen previously,” said Richard K. Valicenti, MD, FASTRO, co-chair of the guideline panel and professor and chairman of radiation oncology at the University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center in Sacramento, California. “With the current update, this collaborative guideline now reflects nearly three decades of multidisciplinary research.”
Story Source:
Materials provided by American Society for Radiation OncologyNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Thomas M. Pisansky, Ian M. Thompson, Richard K. Valicenti, Anthony V. D’Amico, Shalini Selvarajah. Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy:ASTRO/AUA Guideline Amendment Executive Summary 2018Practical Radiation Oncology, 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.04.008

AUA 2019: Survival, Economics: Prostate Cancer with Abiraterone v. Enzalutamide

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among US males and accounts for a great proportion of health expenditures – this expenditure, just for prostate cancer alone, is estimated to be $15-16 billion by 2020. Indeed, many of these costs are directly attributed to systemic therapy used in the advanced prostate cancer disease state. During the advanced prostate cancer podium session at AUA 2019, Dr. Daniel George and colleagues presented real world results of the economics associated with patients receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Few real-world studies have evaluated the comparative effectiveness of abiraterone and enzalutamide on overall survival (OS) and none have described the economic burden associated with US military veterans receiving either treatment. As such, the objective of their study was to evaluate OS and economic outcomes among chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with either of these medications.
This study was a retrospective analysis of 3,174 male patients among those in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database. The study selection flow chart is as follows:
AUA2019_UroToday_Survival Rates and Economic Outcomes in Chemotherapy-Naïve mCRPC_1a.png
Between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2018, mCRPC patients with evidence of surgical or medical castration, a pharmacy claim for abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide (1st claim date = index date) following surgical or medical castration, and with no chemotherapy treatment during the 12 months pre-index date were identified. Patients had to have continuous VHA enrollment for more 12 months pre- and post-index date and were followed until death or disenrollment from the VA system. The authors used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate OS and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the impact of treatment on survival. Subsequently, patients initiating abiraterone acetate were 1:1 propensity score matched with those starting enzalutamide. All-cause and prostate cancer-related resource use and costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were compared between the matched cohorts during the 12 months post-index date.
There were 1,945 abiraterone acetate and 1,229 enzalutamide mCRPC patients with mean ages of 73 and 74 years of age, respectively. Patients initiating enzalutamide had a significantly longer OS compared to those starting abiraterone acetate (29.3 months vs 26.0 months; HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.78-0.96):
AUA2019_UroToday_Survival Rates and Economic Outcomes in Chemotherapy-Naïve mCRPC_2 a.png
After propensity score matching, there were 1,160 patients in each cohort. Compared to abiraterone acetate patients, enzalutamide patients had fewer mean all-cause outpatient visits PPPM (2.51 vs 2.86; p < 0.0001) and fewer mean prostate cancer-related outpatient visits PPPM (0.86 vs 1.03; p < 0.0001). Enzalutamide patients also had lower:
  • Mean all-cause outpatient costs PPPM ($2,588 vs $3,115; p < 0.0001)
  • Mean total costs PPPM ($8,085 vs $9,092; p = 0.0002)
  • Prostate cancer-related outpatient costs PPPM ($1,356 vs $1,775; p < 0.0001)
  • Mean total costs PPPM ($6,321 vs $7,280; p < 0.0001)
Dr. George concluded his presentation with several summary points:
  • In this real-world analysis, patients prescribed enzalutamide compared to abiraterone acetate had great median overall survival, reduced risk of death, fewer prostate cancer outpatient visits and shorter inpatient length of stay, as well as lower all-cause and prostate cancer-related health care costs
  • As a limitation, Dr. George notes that this study was restricted by the factors available in the claims data and that other factors not included in the analysis may affect survival
Presented by: Daniel George, MD, Professor of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology in the Duke University School of Medicine and leads the Duke Prostate and Urologic Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
Co-Authors: Krishnan Ramaswamy, New York, NY, Stanislav Lechpammer, San Francisco, CA, Jack Mardekian, New York, NY, Neil M. Schultz, Northbrook, IL, Ahong Huang, Li Wang, Plano, TX, Onur Baser, Ann Arbor, MI

Urologic Disease Significantly Impacted By Dietary, Social Habits

Dietary and social habits can have significant impacts on urinary health, as evidenced by new studies being presented at the 2019 AUA Annual Meeting in Chicago. Four studies highlight the positive effects of heart-healthy diets on erectile function, the impact of marijuana smoking on urinary health and the impact of restrictive diets on testosterone production. These studies will be presented during a special session for media on May 4, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mayo Clinic urologist Dr. Tobias Kohler, chair of the AUA Public Media Committee, will moderate this session.
Abstracts presented include:
Publication # MP46-03
The Association Between Popular Diets and Serum Testosterone Among Men in the United States
Low-fat diets have been shown to have a number of health benefits, but may have a negative impact on serum testosterone levels in men. This study, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), examined the relationship between diets and serum testosterone levels. Among the 7,316 men identified for the study, 15.9 percent (1,160) were on a low-fat diet, 26.3 percent (1,924) were on a Mediterranean diet and 67.2 percent (4,920) were on a non-restrictive diet.
Key findings include:
  • Compared to men with non-restrictive diets, average testosterone was lower among men with low-fat and Mediterranean diets.
  • Men adhering to a low-fat diet were more likely to have a testosterone level under 300 ng/dl compared to those on non-restrictive diets.
Publication # MP75-09
Marijuana Consumption Has A Direct Deleterious Effect On Spermatozoa By Increasing Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Levels 20 Times More Than Tobacco Smoking: Reasons For Concern On Widespread Use
Marijuana and tobacco smoke have been shown to increase oxidative stress in cells, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), unstable molecules that build up at the cellular level. A build-up of ROS within cells can lead to DNA or RNA damage, or even cellular death. In this study of 622 men, researchers explored the potential association between marijuana and tobacco use in testicular and sperm function, as well as male infertility and hypogonadism. Subjects were divided into four groups: marijuana users (74), tobacco users (144), infertile (125) and fertile (279).
Key findings include:
  • Seminal ROS levels were higher in the marijuana group compared to tobacco and fertile groups.
  • Marijuana users had worse overall semen parameters (including sperm concentration, sperm count, motility and morphology) than tobacco users.
Publication # PD19-08
Marijuana, Alcohol, ED and Depression: Epidemiologic Correlations with BPH/LUTS
Prostatic enlargement (benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH) may cause men to experience bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), such as nocturia, weak urine streams and urgency. In this review of 20,548 patients on medical treatment for BPH/LUTS, researchers identified several risk factors for LUTS: depression, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and also marijuana use. This is the first time marijuana use has been implicated as a risk factor for urination problems.
Key findings include:
  • Marijuana use and erectile dysfunction were associated with an increased risk of being on a LUTS medication.
  • On multivariate analysis, marijuana remained associated with this increased risk.
  • Alcohol use was not associated with an increased risk of BPH/LUTS.
Publication # PD28-07
Heart Healthy Diet and Erectile Dysfunction in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study
Heart-healthy lifestyle changes – such as smoking cessation and weight loss – are attractive, non-pharmacologic options in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), but is unknown whether heart-healthy diets have an association with ED. Researchers conducted a prospective analysis of 26,246 men ages 40 to 75 in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, which included assessments on erectile function and dietary questionnaires (used to calculate Mediterranean Diet and Alternative Health Eating Index scores) to review whether dietary choices were related to risk of incident ED.Key findings include:
Mediteranean Diet and Alternative Health Eating Index (AHEI) scores were associated with decreased risk of incident ED.
  • The inverse association between Mediterranean Diet and AHEI scores was strongest in men under age 60.
  • Higher intakes of legumes, fruit, vegetables, fish and long-chain fats were associated with a decreased risk of ED, and red and processed meats and trans fats were positively association with ED risk.
“This is the first time we’ve seen a definitive connection between marijuana use and certain urologic conditions such as infertility and BPH/LUTS, and in the context of legalization of cannabis, more research is warranted,” Dr. Kohler said. “Most importantly, these studies further underscore the need for healthy lifestyles and an understanding of how what we put in our bodies affects how they function.”

AUA 2019: What Contributes Most to High Prostate Cancer Health Care Costs?

It is known that a small percentage of patients utilize a very large percentage of healthcare expenditures for multiple disease states. At the 2019 American Urologic Association’s (AUA) annual meeting, Maxine Sun from Boston MA presented her group’s data regarding health care spending patterns in men with prostate cancer using the SEER Medicare administrative database.
They studied men aged >66 years with a diagnosis of prostate cancer in 2009. They next stratified men by the amount of healthcare expenditures, specifically looking at the top 5% in order to determine health care pending trends and to determine what contributes to the high costs of care for the top 5% of patients.
They identified 12,875 men with a primary diagnosis of prostate cancer in 2009. The total cost of care for these patients to the healthcare system was $241,800,495 (mean $18781 per patient). The top 5% of men required healthcare expenditures of $62,474,504, while the bottom 95% spent $179,325,991. They found that the factors that were correlated with being a top 5% expenditure patient were older age, more medical conditions at diagnosis, African-American race, and non-married. The top 5% of patients also had higher rates of metastatic disease at diagnosis as compared to the bottom 95% of patients (14% vs. 3%). On multivariate analysis, more advanced disease, unmarried men, higher Charlson comorbidity index, and those living in a higher Medicare spending health service area also were risk factors for being a top 5% expenditure patient.
They concluded that the top 5% of healthcare expenditure patients with prostate cancer in 2009 accounted for 25% of the total cost of treating this very common malignancy. Acknowledgement of the factors contributing to increased healthcare expenditures is very important in order to begin help decreasing the cost of care for prostate cancer, which is the most common soft tissue malignancy in American men.
Presented by: Maxine Sun, Boston MA