Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Biogen on go with Alzheimer’s drug

A new analysis of a larger dataset has borne fruit for Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB) and its Alzheimer’s disease candidate aducanumab. The terminated Phase 3 EMERGE study met the primary endpoint showing a statistically significant reduction in clinical decline at week 78 as measured by a scale called CDR-SB driven primarily by greater exposure to high-dose aducanumab. Specifically, patients in the treatment group experienced a 23% reduction in clinical decline versus placebo (p=0.01).
The company believes that a subset of patients in the also-terminated Phase 3 ENGAGE study support the findings from EMERGE.
As a result, it plans to file a U.S. marketing application next quarter based on consultations with the FDA and the analysis of the expanded dataset from the two studies, discontinued in March after a futility analysis showed that both were unlikely to meet the primary endpoints. After the studies were stopped, additional data became available based on a total of 3,285 patients, 2,066 of whom completed 18 months of treatment.
This is the first time that the clearance of aggregated amyloid beta demonstrated a reduction in clinical decline according to principal investigator Dr. Anton Porsteinsson.
Management will host a conference call this morning at 8:00 ET to discuss the new analysis.
The company is co-developing the monoclonal antibody with Eisai (OTCPK:ESALY).
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3507634-biogen-go-alzheimers-drug-shares-34-percent

Bristol-Myers up 5% on positive Opdivo/Yervoy data in lung cancer

A Phase 3 clinical trial, CheckMate-9LA, evaluating Bristol-Myers Squibb’s (NYSE:BMY) Opdivo (nivolumab) + low-dose Yervoy (ipilimumab), together with two cycles of chemo, for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) compared to chemo alone for up to four cycles followed by optional maintenance therapy.
No new safety signals were reported.
Complete results will be submitted to global health authorities and for presentation at a future medical conference.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3507693-bristol-myers-5-percent-positive-opdivo-yervoy-data-lung-cancer

Merck down 4% on Bristol-Myers’ lung cancer data

Merck (MRK -4.4%) is under modest pressure after Bristol-Myers Squibb reported successful results from a late-stage study evaluating the combination of Opdivo and Yervoy in first-line lung cancer, a hotly contested indication for drugmakers.
Merck is developing top seller Keytruda (pembrolizumab) for the same indication, both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The FDA approved it in April for certain patients with stage III NSCLC. A Keytruda-based combo was approved in China the same month followed by Keytruda as monotherapy earlier this month.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3507792-merck-4-percent-bristol-myers-lung-cancer-data

Monday, October 21, 2019

True health reform depends on several critical policy elements

The Kaiser Family Foundation recently reported that the average cost of employer provided health care coverage for a family has exceeded $20,000. Costs have risen by more than 50 percent since 2009. Health care now makes up nearly a fifth of the American economy, putting an enormous drag on economic growth and wages. It is the biggest concern for small businesses and their employees year after year.
Americans agree that the health care status quo is not working. Democrats have responded by calling to nationalize health care under a “Medicare for All” system. Yet this policy would not address the fundamental health care cost drivers. It simply would transfer costs to taxpayers while introducing rationing in an attempt to control them.
Our research tells us there are better alternatives, ones that harness the same market forces of choice, competition, and transparency that keep prices low in nearly all other sectors of the economy. These are proposals that eliminate the cronyism, backroom deals, and hidden contracts that artificially inflate costs, and that preserve and expand choice and the important relationship between doctors and patients.
One such reform framework is the “Health Care for You” plan which our organizations, the Job Creators Network and the Goodman Institute for Public Policy Research, are promoting. It was developed from extensive market research into demonstrated patient preference. It draws on inputs of more than 25,000 patients, doctors, and health care professionals to determine what stakeholders instead of politicians want from a health care plan. It is the first health care reform plan that comes directly from people rather than from Washington backrooms.
There are other reform plans, of course, which could be part of this debate. But based on our research, we believe that for any reform to succeed, it must include several components focused on what patients, families, and doctors say they need, and must preserve the aspects of American health care that once made it the envy of the world.
Among the most popular and innovative health reforms is portable insurance that travels with Americans from job to job, and in and out of the national labor market. Today, most health insurance is tethered to employment because employers pay for coverage with pretax dollars. This favorable tax treatment, in effect a tax deduction, should be extended to all Americans, independent of their current jobs. Reform should also broaden contribution limits and relax restrictions on personal health management accounts, also known as health savings accounts.
Putting individuals back in charge of their health care spending through expanded tax free accounts would vastly increase direct medical care, also known as direct primary care for family doctor needs. This direct model cuts out middlemen to lower costs. It only requires about a third of the number of administrators as traditional providers. Larry Van Horn, an economist at Vanderbilt University, estimates that cash health care prices are 40 percent lower than negotiated rates of insurers.
Cheaper telemedicine, in which patients see doctors and get diagnosed over online portals, should be part of any direct medical care model. In addition to slashing overhead and administrative costs, telemedicine is more convenient for busy patients who could reach doctors over phone or text. Inexplicably, Congress has held up its expansion by passing a law that mostly prohibits telemedicine under Medicare.
Our research shows that the overwhelming majority of patients want the relationships with their doctors restored. It has been weakened by years of bureaucratic, lobbyist, and political intervention. Serious health care reform should get these third parties out of exam rooms by reducing regulations on physician paperwork, mandated essential benefits, and geographic and provider network limits.
Finally, patients want personalized plans that make sense for them rather than the expensive “one size fits all” policies that proliferate today. This individualized health care vision stands in stark contrast to collectivized “Medicare for All” that would put the government in the examination room, alongside doctors and patients, as the sole payer.
There is one government rule that remains important, according to our research, which is maintaining protections for those with preexisting conditions. Any serious reform plan should prohibit discrimination against these patients, but it should also move them into insurance risk pools where they will not inflate general health care costs.
Taken together, these reforms would put patients first by restoring choice, repairing the relationship between doctors and patients, and improving affordability. Those who are not ready to throw up their hands and socialize American health care should support them all.
Alfredo Ortiz is president and chief executive officer of the Job Creators Network. John Goodman is an economist and president of the Goodman Institute for Public Policy Research who is credited with originating the policy idea of health savings accounts and other federal tax innovations.
https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/466731-true-health-reform-depends-on-several-critical-policy-elements

Topical wound oxygen therapy helps heal diabetic foot ulcers

Adjuvant cyclical pressure topical wound oxygen (TWO2) therapy, compared with sham control therapy, in addition to optimal standard of care is superior for healing chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), according to a study published online Oct. 16 in Diabetes Care.
Robert G. Frykberg, M.D., from Diabetic Foot Consultants at Midwestern University in Glendale, Arizona, and colleagues examined the efficacy of multimodality cyclical pressure TWO2 home care for patients with diabetes and chronic DFUs. Participants were randomly assigned to either active TWO2 therapy or sham control therapy, both in addition to optimal standard of care. Predetermined analyses and hard stopping rules were performed when 73, 146, and 220 patients had completed the 12-week treatment phase.
The researchers found that the active TWO2 arm was superior to the sham arm at the first analysis point, with a closure rate of 41.7 versus 13.5 percent (odds ratio, 4.57). The odds ratio increased to 6.00 after adjustment for University of Texas Classification (UTC) grade. Compared with the sham arm, Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated a significantly increased likelihood for DFUs to heal over 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 4.66), also after adjustment for UTC grade. At 12 months postenrollment, 56 and 27 percent of active-arm ulcers and sham-arm ulcers were closed.
“Uniquely, the therapy has additional benefit in that it can be administered by the patient at home without the expense and difficulties of daily travel to a specialized center,” the authors write.
One author disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry; the study was sponsored by AOTI Ltd.

Explore further
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy no benefit for diabetic foot ulcers

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

‘Missing’ virus detected in dozens of children paralyzed by polio-like illness

A UC San Francisco-led research team has detected the immunological remnants of a common seasonal virus in spinal fluid from dozens of patients diagnosed with acute flaccid myelitis (AFM)—a polio-like illness that causes permanent, sometimes life-threatening paralysis in young children. The findings provide the clearest evidence to date that AFM is caused by an enterovirus (EV) that invades and impairs the central nervous system.
The study was published October 21, 2019 in Nature Medicine.
AFM, which begins with cold-like symptoms and progresses to limb weakness and paralysis in a matter of days, was first documented in 2012. Since then, AFM outbreaks have occurred every other year, with more than 500 confirmed cases recorded so far. But because scientists have had trouble pinpointing a cause, AFM has been the subject of contentious debate within the medical community.
Mounting evidence implicated EVs as the likely culprit—specifically the so-called D68 and A71 strains of the virus. EV outbreaks are common and normally cause nothing more severe than cold-like symptoms or the rash-producing hand, foot and mouth disease.
Scientists started to notice, however, that EV outbreaks coincided with spikes in AFM. They also found that respiratory samples from children diagnosed with AFM often tested positive for EVs. Plus, found that these strains caused paralysis in mice.
But many experts remained skeptical of the enterovirus hypothesis, instead proposing that AFM is an autoimmune disorder or is caused by some other, as-yet-undiscovered virus. These EV skeptics argued that that the evidence linking the virus to AFM was circumstantial, because the virus could not be found in 98 percent of AFM patients who had their tested. They maintained that until there was ample evidence of the virus invading the human nervous system, the link between EVs and AFM remained unproven.
“People were hung up on the fact that enteroviruses were rarely detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of AFM patients. They wanted to know how someone could get neurologic symptoms with no virus detectable in their central nervous system,” said Michael Wilson, MD, associate professor of neurology, member of the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and senior author of the new study. “If we could detect something specific to a virus in in the spinal fluid of AFM patients, we would feel more secure claiming that the neurologic symptoms of the disease are virally mediated.”
The group first searched for the virus directly in spinal fluid using advanced deep sequencing technologies, but this sort of direct detection of the virus failed, as it had previously. Therefore, to find evidence of the missing virus, Wilson and his collaborators—researchers at the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health, the University of Colorado, Boston Children’s Hospital and the University of Ottawa—used an enhanced version of a virus-hunting tool called VirScan, first developed at Harvard Medical School in the laboratory of Stephen J. Elledge, Ph.D.
VirScan, which is a customized version of a Nobel Prize-winning technique called phage (rhymes with “beige”) display, allowed Wilson’s team to probe the spinal fluid of AFM patients for signs of an immune response against enterovirus and thousands of other viruses simultaneously.
“When there’s an infection in the spinal cord, antibody-making immune cells travel there and make more antibodies. We think finding antibodies against enterovirus in the spinal fluid of AFM patients means the virus really does go to the spinal cord. This helps us lay the blame on these viruses,” said Ryan Schubert, MD, a clinical fellow in UCSF’s Department of Neurology, a member of Wilson’s Lab, and lead author of the new study.
The researchers created molecular libraries consisting of nearly 500,000 small chunks of every protein found in the over 3,000 viruses known to infect vertebrates (including humans), as well as those that infect mosquitoes and ticks (an effort to rule out disease transmission through their bites). They then exposed these molecular libraries to spinal fluid obtained from 42 children with AFM and, as a control, 58 who were diagnosed with other neurological diseases. Any chunks of viral protein cross-reacting with any antibodies present in the spinal fluid would provide evidence for a viral infection in the central nervous system.
Antibodies against enterovirus were found in the spinal fluid of nearly 70 percent of AFM patients; less than 7 percent of non-AFM patients tested positive for these antibodies. Furthermore, because spinal fluid from AFM patients did not contain antibodies against any other virus, every other known virus could be eliminated as a possible culprit. These results were confirmed using more conventional lab techniques.
“The strength of this study is not just what was found, but also what was not found,” said Joe DeRisi, Ph.D., professor of biochemistry and biophysics at UCSF, co-president of the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, and co-author of the new study. “Enterovirus antibodies were the only ones enriched in AFM patients. No other viral family showed elevated antibody levels.”
Though the study provides the most robust evidence so far that enteroviruses cause AFM, many questions around AFM and these viruses remain unanswered. For example, though the AFM-causing enterovirus strains—EV-D68 and EV-A71—were identified decades ago, they only recently seemed to have gained the ability to cause paralysis, with the D68 strain in particular responsible for the most severe cases of AFM.
“Presumably there are changes that are causing the virus to be more neurovirulent, but no one knows for sure what they are,” Schubert said. “Because the virus is found in such low amounts, if at all, it’s hard to zero in on the differences between an A71 virus that causes routine hand, foot, and mouth disease and one that causes AFM.”
Also, because enteroviruses are extremely common, scientists are still trying to figure out why fewer than 1 percent of infected children get AFM, and they’re also trying to understand why children are the only ones affected. “We don’t know for sure why children get paralysis and adults don’t,” Schubert said. “The thinking is that young children have low immunity to the virus that increases as they get older, so we see the most severe effects in children around the age of two. But more work needs to be done to understand AFM.”
For study co-author Riley Bove, MD, answering these unresolved questions is a deeply personal mission. Bove, an assistant professor of neurology and member of the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, is the mother of a child who was diagnosed with AFM.
In the summer of 2014, Bove’s entire family came down with what seemed to be a severe cold. Everyone recovered except Bove’s then four-year-old son. Just days after the onset of the cold-like symptoms, he started experiencing difficulty breathing. Soon, he was paralyzed from head to toe and had trouble breathing on his own.
Today, Bove’s son is a thriving nine-year-old, but she says the physical and emotional effects of AFM will be with him the rest of his life. “For every family with a child diagnosed with AFM, the long-term consequences of the disease remain the top issue,” she said.
Bove hopes that the new study will lead to a scientific consensus around enterovirus as the cause of AFM, since this a key step on the road to improved diagnostics and the development of a vaccine for the illness.
“Public health education is important, but it’s not enough to prevent AFM,” Bove said. “The is too common to avoid. A vaccine is the only way to meaningfully prevent the disease.”
For now, there’s no way to prevent or treat AFM. But if it follows the biennial pattern first established after the 2012 outbreak, AFM cases may spike again next year.
“We’re all holding our breath for 2020,” Schubert said.

Explore further
Enterovirus antibodies detected in acute flaccid myelitis patients

More information: Pan-viral serology implicates enteroviruses in acute flaccid myelitis, Nature Medicine (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0613-1 , https://nature.com/articles/s41591-019-0613-1

1 in 3 pain patients suffer side effects after ketamine infusion therapy

As the opioid epidemic continues to devastate the United States, ketamine use has grown as a pain management alternative, yet more than one in three patients may experience side effects such as hallucinations and visual disturbances, suggests new research presented at the Anesthesiology 2019 annual meeting.
Ketamine is a powerful anesthetic that is also used to treat acute and and depression. While the drug is known for some side effects that negatively affect mental status, there are many other potential risks. Recent consensus guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Pain Medicine and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) support infusion therapy for acute pain management, but the groups note more studies are needed to determine the best approach for using it safely and effectively.
“Despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of ketamine for multiple uses, including general anesthesia and treatment of depression, the effects of using the at low doses to treat pain have not been extensively studied,” said Padma Gulur, M.D., lead author, member of ASA’s Committee on Pain Medicine and professor of anesthesiology at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. “Our research aimed to determine both short- and long-term side effects of low dose ketamine when used for pain treatment.”
Researchers conducted a review of side effects related to ketamine infusions for pain management. Reported side effects were categorized into two groups: those directly linked to ketamine (hallucinations, vivid dreams, out-of-body experience and/or unusual thoughts) and those associated with using ketamine in combination with other drugs (sedation, visual disturbances and urinary dysfunction).
Of 297 Duke University pain patients who received ketamine infusion therapy between January and June 2017, 104 (35%) reported significant side effects. Twenty percent of these patients suffered side effects directly linked to ketamine, while 15% experienced side effects associated with the use of ketamine in combination with other drugs.
“Although the has prompted the medical community to thoroughly investigate pain management alternatives, our number one priority is to ensure the safety of patients receiving ketamine,” said Dr. Gulur. “More than one in three patients reported significant side effects from ketamine infusions that required ongoing monitoring or resulted in discontinuation of therapy. More research on the impact of ketamine use for on the population is needed.”
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-10-pain-patients-side-effects-ketamine.html