Search This Blog

Thursday, April 8, 2021

Clustering Covid symptoms by nation and multi-morbidities reveal substantial differences to classical symptoms

 

Balasundaram KadirveluGabriel BurceaJennifer QuintCeire E CostelloeAldo A. Faisal

SARS-CoV-2 detectable in sensitive RNA saliva test days before viral load detectable on low-sensitivity nasal swabs

 

Emily S. SavelaAlexander WinnettAnna E. RomanoMichael K. PorterNatasha ShelbyReid AkanaMatthew M. CooperJenny JiNoah W. SchlenkerJessica A. ReyesAlyssa M. CarterJacob T. BarlowColten TognazziniMatthew FeasterYing-Ying GohRustem F. Ismagilov

Visceral fat shows strongest association with need of intensive care in patients with COVID-19

 


PDF: https://www.metabolismjournal.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0026-0495%2820%2930183-9

Highlights

  • High BMI is a risk factor of COVID-19 severity especially among the young.
  • BMI in an indirect marker of body fat excess.
  • COVID-19 patients routine chest CT scan may be leveraged to directly quantify body fat.
  • Visceral fat deposition is higher in COVID-19 patients accessing ICU.
  • Visceral fat is associated with the need of intensive care (OR = 2.474).

Abstract

Background

Obesity was recently identified as a major risk factor for worse COVID-19 severity, especially among the young. The reason why its impact seems to be less pronounced in the elderly may be due to the concomitant presence of other comorbidities. However, all reports only focus on BMI, an indirect marker of body fat.

Aim

To explore the impact on COVID-19 severity of abdominal fat as a marker of body composition easily collected in patients undergoing a chest CT scan.

Methods

Patients included in this retrospective study were consecutively enrolled among those admitted to an Emergency Department in Rome, Italy, who tested positive for SARS-Cov-2 and underwent a chest CT scan in March 2020. Data were extracted from electronic medical records.

Results

150 patients were included (64.7% male, mean age 64 ± 16 years). Visceral fat (VAT) was significantly higher in patients requiring intensive care (p = 0.032), together with age (p = 0.009), inflammation markers CRP and LDH (p < 0.0001, p = 0.003, respectively), and interstitial pneumonia severity as assessed by a Lung Severity Score (LSS) (p < 0.0001). Increasing age, lymphocytes, CRP, LDH, D-Dimer, LSS, total abdominal fat as well as VAT were found to have a significant univariate association with the need of intensive care. A multivariate analysis showed that LSS and VAT were independently associated with the need of intensive care (OR: 1.262; 95%CI: 1.0171–1.488; p = 0.005 and OR: 2.474; 95%CI: 1.017–6.019; p = 0.046, respectively).

Conclusions

VAT is a marker of worse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Given the exploratory nature of our study, further investigation is needed to confirm our findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying such association.

Cutaneous Reactions Reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination

 

  • DD
  • SDOI:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.092
  •   





  • Abstract

    Background

    Cutaneous reactions after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines have been reported but are not well characterized.

    Objective

    To evaluate morphology and timing of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

    Methods

    A provider-facing registry-based study collected cases of cutaneous manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination.

    Results

    From December 2020-February 2021, we recorded 414 cutaneous reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna (83%) and Pfizer (17%). Delayed large local reactions were most common, followed by local injection site reactions, urticarial eruptions, and morbilliform eruptions. Forty-three percent of patients with first dose reactions experienced second dose recurrence.

    Limitations

    Registry analysis does not measure incidence. Morphologic misclassification is possible.

    Conclusion

    We report a spectrum of cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Most patients with first dose reactions did not develop a second dose reaction, and no patients in the registry developed serious adverse events after the first or second dose. These data provide reassurance to patients and providers.



Phase 1 cancer biotech Artiva Biotherapeutics files for $100M IPO

 Artiva Biotherapeutics, a phase 1 cancer biotech developing off-the-shelf natural killer cell-based therapies, filed on Thursday with the SEC to raise up to $100 million in an initial public offering.


Artiva is leveraging a proprietary platform and manufacturing capabilities to generate a broad pipeline of off-the-shelf NK cell therapeutic candidates for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The company's lead product candidate, AB-101, is an off-the-shelf natural killer (NK) cell therapy that is currently being studied in a Phase 1/2 trial with rituximab in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patient dosing was initiated in the first quarter of 2021, with initial monotherapy safety data expected in late 2021 and interim combination data with rituximab expected in 2022. The company is also developing AB-201 and AB-202, its first two chimeric antigen receptor-NK product candidates, for which Artiva plans to file INDs in 2022. 

The San Diego, CA-based company was founded in 2019 and plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol RTVA. Goldman Sachs, Cowen and Evercore ISI are the joint bookrunners on the deal. No pricing terms were disclosed.