Search This Blog

Thursday, September 9, 2021

Visualizing how fast the pandemic is getting better or worse, state by state

 Well over a year into the Covid-19 pandemic, visualizations of case data have become ubiquitous. By far, the most popular metric that public health officials and media outlets rely on is the daily count of new cases.

But as the Delta wave picked up steam in the U.S., STAT introduced a new metric that helps detect early changes in case trends: case acceleration.

On this page, STAT is making available for the first time real-time acceleration data for U.S. states and territories.

Charts on this page use data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University, and Our World in Data to calculate the rate of weekly case acceleration, based on daily case counts. Charts on this page will be updated daily as new data become available.

What is acceleration?

A car’s speedometer tells you how fast that car is moving at any given time. The scientific term for this is velocity. Acceleration is a measure of the change in velocity, in other words how fast something is speeding up or slowing down.

The daily count of new Covid-19 cases can be thought of as the pandemic’s velocity. If velocity tells us how bad the pandemic is at any given time, acceleration tells us how fast things are getting better or worse.

In these charts, when the values are positive, new case counts are increasing, and when the values are negative, new case counts are falling. Highlighted in red, we can see more clearly each wave’s intensity and duration..

What has changed

Since STAT’s analysis of acceleration data in June, the course of the Delta wave has progressed significantly.

Missouri, the first state to experience prolonged positive acceleration this summer, now appears past its peak with cases consistently slowing down.

Likewise, many of the southern states where the Delta wave has been felt most acutely — Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, and Louisiana — are also now seeing sustained deceleration in cases.

In the case of Louisiana, however, it should be noted that the state is currently recovering from the impacts of Hurricane Ida, which could be affecting the state’s reporting ability, thus skewing the data downward.

However, other states like West Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia, continue to see sustained case acceleration.

+2.66+1.93+1.48+1.40+1.35+1.28+1.23+1.08+1.05+1.01+0.92+0.79+0.78+0.76+0.71+0.69+0.68+0.67+0.61+0.58+0.57+0.56+0.46+0.37+0.34+0.34+0.31+0.29+0.29+0.28+0.27+0.21+0.19+0.15+0.14+0.09+0.05+0.00−0.00−0.01−0.02−0.04−0.08−0.08−0.29−0.34−0.63−0.70−0.80−1.29−2.62−3.32−3.00−2.00−1.00+0.00+1.00+2.00West VirginiaSouth CarolinaWyomingOhioNorth DakotaIndianaAlaskaIdahoSouth DakotaMontanaNorth CarolinaGeorgiaMaineOklahomaNebraskaDelawareVirginiaUtahHawaiiIowaPennsylvaniaKentuckyWisconsinTennesseeIllinoisMichiganMassachusettsWashingtonVermontNew HampshireColoradoArizonaDistrict of ColumbiaOregonMarylandRhode IslandNew JerseyTexasMinnesotaNevadaNew MexicoNew YorkConnecticutKansasAlabamaMissouriArkansasPuerto RicoCaliforniaFloridaMississippiLouisianaCovid-19 case acceleration by state/territoryCases per 100k people / week / day

Select a state/territory for detailed data:

WV
SC
WY
OH
ND
IN
AK
ID
SD
MT
NC
GA
ME
OK
NE
DE
VA
UT
HI
IA
PA
KY
WI
TN
IL
MI
MA
WA
VT
NH
CO
AZ
DC
OR
MD
RI
NJ
TX
MN
NV
NM
NY
CT
KS
AL
MO
AR
PR
CA
FL
MS
LA
AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJuly−100−500.05010014-day averageFirst wave peakFall/winter 2020 peakCases / week / dayCovid-19 case acceleration in ALAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJuly0.01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k7.0kCases / dayNew Covid-19 cases in ALData current as of: 2021-09-07
J. EMORY PARKER/STATSOURCES: JHU CSSE, WHO, CDC, OUR WORLD IN DATA

https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/06/visualizing-fast-the-pandemic-is-getting-better-or-worse-state-by-state/

Risk of side effects could change with Covid-19 vaccine boosters

 Additional doses of Covid-19 vaccines are likely rolling out in the United States later this year. It raises the question: What will the side effects from a booster shot look like? Is there a higher or lower risk of an adverse event, compared to the earlier regimens?

Overall, the Covid-19 vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and remarkably effective. But as the shots went into millions of arms starting late last year, researchers uncovered a handful of sometimes serious side effects, which were so exceedingly rare that the clinical trials that led to the shots’ authorizations — even with tens of thousands of participants — couldn’t capture them. Researchers don’t fully understand the root causes of some of the side effects, but they’ve also reported that the risk of some of them, including certain heart and blood clotting issues, is much higher after a Covid-19 infection itself than after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.

STAT asked experts what the landscape of adverse events might look like following another dose, and they stressed that they were speculating. Because the additional doses haven’t gone into many arms yet, the amount of data is limited, so it’s impossible to forecast what will happen. (Whether boosters are necessary from a protection standpoint is another issue. Many experts argue there is not evidence to support adults broadly needing boosters, though certain groups of people, like those with compromised immune systems, do.)

“We’re reading the tea leaves,” said Mark Slifka of Oregon Health and Science University, an expert on immunology, viruses, and vaccines.

Better answers could arrive soon. Israel and some European countries are ahead of the United States in their version of booster plans. A study looking at the early days of Israel’s booster campaign, giving another dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine to people 60 or older, did not appear to turn up any new safety concerns. And statements from the companies about their small studies of boosters have indicated similar safety features to the earlier doses.

Since most issues tied to vaccination occur shortly after the shots are delivered, “if there was a dramatic increase in risk in terms of the safety profile, we’d start to see that soon,” Slifka said.

Below, STAT outlines some of the side effects tied to the different vaccines and what experts are considering at this point.

More common, less worrisome issue: feeling sick after shot

With the two-dose mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, the second shot proved to be a real doozy for some who rolled up their sleeves. It wasn’t universal, but lots of people felt fluish, feverish, and achy for a day or two, typically after their second shot.

The culprit was the immune system really ramping up. If the first shot provided the body’s defenses with the scent of a key protein from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, then the immune system was ready to pounce when it saw that spike protein again with shot #2. It was all in the name of building up a lasting and robust blockade in the body, but it did mean some people had quite a hangover after the second dose.

“The immune system goes, ‘I know what this is,’ and attacks it more vigorously,” said Kawsar Talaat, a Johns Hopkins infectious disease physician and vaccine researcher.

Talaat said that it’s possible that, because the immune system is already primed to recognize and target the spike protein, some people could experience something similar after a third dose.

But Slifka offered another hypothesis, one where perhaps the third shot won’t be as bad, or won’t affect as many people. In the United States, second doses were given three to four weeks after the first dose, so the immune system was still in a heightened state from that first shot. Maybe, Slifka said, if people aren’t getting boosters until at least eight months later, their immune systems will have calmed, and the third shot won’t come with quite the kick the second shot did.

Anaphylaxis

Soon after the mRNA vaccines were authorized last year, it became clear that some people were having severe allergic reactions. The discovery led the United States and other countries to advise that people should be monitored for 15 minutes after receiving their shots — 30 minutes for people with a history of severe allergies — and that providers should be equipped to deliver epinephrine, which can treat anaphylaxis.

The initial estimate for the Pfizer shot was up to 11 cases of anaphylaxis per 1 million doses given, but more recent data suggests the rate for both the Pfizer and Moderna immunizations is about 5 per million doses administered. At a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory panel meeting last month, experts noted that most cases occurred in women after the first dose, though they added that perhaps that was at least in part because people who had such a reaction to the first shot didn’t get their second dose — a move the CDC recommends.

Still, subsequent research has shown that people who appeared to have some form of allergic reaction after the first dose were able to safely receive a second dose.

As for people who haven’t had an allergic reaction to the vaccines, they’re probably at low risk for such a response to a third dose, Talaat said. “If you’ve tolerated two doses of a vaccine, you’re far less likely to have an anaphylactic reaction to a third dose.” 

Myocarditis and pericarditis

Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the tissue around the heart) have also been tied to the mRNA vaccines, with higher rates among men under 40 compared to older men and women overall, and the greatest risk in boys age 12 to 17, health authorities have said. Most cases have occurred soon after the second dose.

The vast majority of the cases investigated so far have been mild compared to cases of myocarditis tied to other causes, including viral infections. And a recent study from Israel found that there was a higher risk of myocarditis associated with a Covid-19 infection than with a Covid-19 vaccine.

To some experts, the clustering of cases soon after the second shot suggests that they are a result of the immune response, which, after being primed by the first dose, goes too far and causes the inflammation. One hypothesis for people who develop myocarditis or pericarditis after the first shot is that some had an initial Covid-19 infection, so the first shot was the equivalent of a second exposure, akin to the second dose in people who hadn’t had Covid-19.

David Juurlink, the head of the division of clinical pharmacology at the University of Toronto, has concerns that if it’s the immune response that’s triggering the inflammation, then it might occur at higher rates after the third dose. Beyond that, he also thinks it’s possible that cases could be more severe.

“I do worry that for young men who’ve had two doses and get a third, the risk might be higher,” Juurlink said.

In granting full approval to the Pfizer shot last month, the Food and Drug Administration said the rates of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccinated boys 16 to 17 years old could be as high as 1 in every 5,000, but that the benefits of the shots still outweighed the risks.

But the possibility of a third dose could reignite the debate around the risk-benefit profile, particularly for boys and young men. If third doses wind up increasing the risk of myocarditis in those groups even higher — and it’s not clear that an extra shot is all that necessary to protect them from Covid-19 — should they broadly receive boosters? Or should it just be older people, who are at lower risk of developing myocarditis after the shots and whose immunity against Covid-19 might be waning in a more worrisome way than young people’s?

Data that could help settle those questions don’t exist yet. But boosters won’t be made available to everyone all at once. They’ll start going to people who had their initial regimens first, including older people and health workers. If researchers detect an increase in myocarditis among them after their third shots, Juurlink said, it could be a signal that health authorities should account for that elevated risk as they consider boosters for younger men.

On the other hand, Slifka raised the possibility that if third shots are given long enough after the second shot, perhaps the immune system will have had a chance to stabilize, and there won’t be any further increase in the risk of myocarditis or pericarditis.

The clotting question

Though U.S. officials are advancing the mRNA vaccines into booster programs first, a Johnson & Johnson booster could also eventually be made available. The J&J shot was authorized as a one-dose regimen, so the booster would be a second shot.

The most concerning adverse event tied to the J&J shot is what’s been named thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, or vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT), which is characterized by an unusual combination of widespread blood clots and low platelet counts. It appears to be extremely rare, but has also caused serious health crises and some deaths. (The condition, which could be the result of an aberrant immune response, has also been linked to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, which uses a similar design as the J&J shot. The AZ shot has not been authorized in the United States.)

Experts said they weren’t sure whether the risk of this particular side effect might change with a second shot of the J&J vaccine. The AZ vaccine is given as two doses, so it could shed some light on what might happen with a second dose of the J&J immunization, but analyses of VITT cases have typically detected them after the first dose. The risk appears to be higher for younger adults than older adults, according to a study published last month looking at 170 definite and 50 probable cases of VITT in the United Kingdom that occurred after the first dose of the AZ vaccine. Initially, VITT seemed to occur among women more frequently, though the recent U.K. study did not find a difference based on sex.

One possibility is that a tiny fraction of people have some sort of genetic factor that leaves them vulnerable to a condition like VITT developing. If that is the case, then people who safely got their first J&J dose might not face much risk in getting a second one.

The J&J shot has also been tied in rare cases to Guillain-Barré syndrome, which involves muscle weakness and sometimes temporary paralysis. Experts told STAT they weren’t sure whether or how the risk of that might change with a second dose of the shot.

https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/07/how-risk-side-effects-could-change-covid-19-vaccine-boosters/

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Major hurdle to developing new Covid-19 vaccines and best booster approaches

 The world still needs more — and better — Covid-19 vaccines. But a major hurdle stands in the way of the development of new vaccines, as well as the critical studies needed to determine the best way to use these important tools, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) warned in a letter published Tuesday in the journal Nature.

Unless countries that have purchased vaccine doses and companies that have already brought vaccines into use agree to find ways to resolve the problem, manufacturers that trail the first wave of producers may not be able to prove that their vaccines work. Not only will that slow efforts to vaccinate the planet, it will block development of next-generation vaccines, and it will stymie efforts to answer key public health questions, like whether boosting with a different vaccine would generate better protection, or whether giving smaller — fractional — doses could protect more people more quickly.

The letter was signed by CEPI’s director of vaccine research and development, Melanie Saville.

In an interview with STAT, CEPI’s U.S. director, Nicole Lurie, said the organization has been trying for months to break the logjam, to no avail. “We’re going round and round in circles.”

The problem stems in part from the fact that at this point in the pandemic, it isn’t considered ethical to test new vaccines against placebos; instead they would have to be tested against one of the existing shots. But getting one’s hands on licensed or authorized vaccines for study purposes is nigh on impossible; all available doses have been snapped up by countries keen to vaccinate as many of their citizens as possible.

Contracts for those doses contain rigid stipulations about how the vaccines can be deployed. The doses often have to be used in the country that made the purchase; when the Biden administration wanted to share AstraZeneca doses with Canada and Mexico in March, it loaned the doses to get around the restrictions. Contracts also often stipulate that doses that have been purchased must be used for outbreak control, not for research purposes, Lurie said.

There’s little upside for companies to make doses of their vaccines available for study purposes. With global demand vastly exceeding current supply, manufacturers can sell every dose that they can make.

And there are potential downsides. If a clinical trial testing a new vaccine shows it performs better than the vaccine to which it was compared, that doesn’t help future sales of the comparator vaccine. Likewise, if a study showed that it would be better to use a different vaccine as a booster shot — called a heterologous boost — that could undercut plans by manufacturers like Pfizer and Moderna to sell third shots of their vaccines.

There are many questions that need answering about the best way to use Covid vaccines. And the only way to answer them is to conduct studies — studies that would require doses of vaccines like Pfizer-BioNTech’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax, as well as the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines and shots made by manufacturers outside of North America and Europe.

“Whether it’s interval [between doses], whether it’s heterologous prime-boost [studies], whether it’s boosting strategies, fractional dosing, whatever …  you need an authorized vaccine” to test against, Lurie said. “And we can’t get access to vaccines. That’s the basic issue.”

The problem shouldn’t be insurmountable. The South Korean vaccine manufacturer, SK Bioscience, announced recently that it is beginning a Phase 3 trial of a vaccine it is developing in conjunction with vaccine giant GSK, which is supplying a boosting compound known as an adjuvant. The clinical trial will compare the SK vaccine against AstraZeneca’s vaccine. SK Bioscience also produces the AstraZeneca vaccine.

On the health policy studies front, so-called mix-and-match trials are being conducted both in the United States and in Britain. The aim is to see whether using two different vaccines is more effective than using the same vaccine for both priming and boosting doses.

The U.S. trial, being conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is studying combinations of the three vaccines authorized for use in this country: the Pfizer, Moderna and J&J vaccines. The U.K. trial, being conducted by the University of Oxford, is studying combinations of the Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines — which are all authorized for use in Britain — as well as a vaccine made by Novavax, which is in the process of seeking emergency use authorization from the British regulatory authorities.

But in both cases, the trials are only being conducted using vaccines authorized for use in the country in which the study is being conducted. That means that questions that have global ramifications — for instance, could some of the Chinese vaccines be more effective if boosted with a Pfizer, AstraZeneca, or Novavax vaccine? — won’t be answered by these studies. None of the Chinese vaccines has been authorized in either the U.S. or the U.K.

Lurie said CEPI is willing to finance some of these crucial studies, but “moving forward on any of those things is contingent upon us getting vaccine.”

The amount of vaccine doses needed is not massive. A Phase 3 trial of a new vaccine might require 20,000 doses of a comparator vaccine. A Phase 2 trial measuring immunogenicity — the levels of antibodies vaccine doses generate — would need substantially fewer. The British trial, called Com-COV2, is giving just over 1,000 volunteers a third dose of a vaccine that differs from their original vaccination regimen. The U.S. trial is smaller still, involving about 150 people.

Lurie said the problem could be solved, if countries buying vaccine modify the contracts with suppliers. A number have initially indicated willingness, she said, but progress has stalled when they realize the amount of work involved.

“We have a global problem to solve,” Lurie said. “We’re stuck with the vaccines we have unless we can move forward.”

https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/07/cepi-warns-of-major-hurdle-to-developing-new-covid-19-vaccines-boosters/

Moderna turns to biotech startup to ramp up Covid vaccine manufacturing

 Moderna will turn to a biotech startup, National Resilience, to manufacture additional doses of its Covid-19 vaccine.

Moderna had previously said it would manufacture 800 million to 1 billion doses of its Covid-19 vaccine in 2021, ramping up to 3 billion doses in 2022.  A person familiar with the company said the collaboration might result in hundreds of millions more doses. Currently, the vaccine is given as a two-dose series, though Moderna has said at least some patients may need a third dose given many months later.

National Resilience will manufacture mRNA to produce the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine at its facility in Mississauga, Ontario, for worldwide distribution. The company is headquartered in San Diego and Cambridge, Mass.

“This collaboration has the potential to ensure more people are protected around the world from the deadly Covid-19 virus,” said Rahul Singhvi, CEO of Resilience, as it is usually called.

Resilience raised $800 million from private investors last November. It was the brainchild of ARCH Venture Partners co-founder Robert Nelsen, who said that he hatched the company from his anger over the pandemic. The technology behind new biotechnology treatments, including mRNA and gene therapy, can be difficult to manufacture, and it appeared to him that even if vaccines and treatments for Covid-19 were developed there would not be enough manufacturing capacity. The company’s board of directors includes former Indiana governor Mitch Daniels, former Senator Bob Kerrey, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, through his position as a venture capitalist at New Enterprise Associates, and Nobel laureate Francis Arnold.\Speaking at the STAT Breakthrough Science Summit this summer, Nelsen said that he put the company together entirely with his cell phone, eschewing a computer, and mostly, he said, in his bathrobe.

Even as Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech have ramped up production on their vaccines, demand for the shots far exceeds supply, with many countries in the developing world unable to get new vaccines. This has put pressure on the companies to further increase production.

In an interview with STAT, Singhvi said that the deal came together over a period of months, thanks in part to his prior relationship with Moderna’s head of manufacturing. He emphasized that, in the long-term, Resilience wants to not merely be a contract manufacturer but to improve the science of manufacturing.

“This gives us more conviction that the world needs high quality manufacturing,” Singhvi said. “The world needs better infrastructure and supply chain resiliency so it can respond to these types of challenges in the future.”

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/08/moderna-turns-to-biotech-startup-to-ramp-up-covid-vaccine-manufacturing/