Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Axcella Launches Clinical Program to Develop Treatment for Long COVID

 

  • Potential to play leading role in addressing Long COVID fatigue and muscle weakness via AXA1125’s mitochondrial and bioenergetic impact

  • Phase 2a clinical trial to be initiated by researchers at Oxford University by year-end; top-line data readout anticipated by mid-2022

  • Program to be discussed at Axcella’s R&D Day today at 10 a.m. EDT

A webcast of this event can be accessed by visiting the "Investors & News" section of the company’s website, www.axcellatx.com. A webcast replay will be available for 90 days following the presentation.

Moderna Agrees to Supply up to 110M Doses of Its COVID-19 Vaccine to African Union

 Doses offered at Moderna’s lowest tiered price in line with its global access commitments

This agreement is in addition to Moderna’s agreement with COVAX for up to 500 million doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine through 2022

Discussions ongoing for fill/finish manufacturing in Africa in 2023, as stepping stone to Moderna drug substance plant in Africa

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moderna-announces-memorandum-understanding-supply-052300041.html

Selecta, Ginkgo Bioworks Partner on Treatments for Orphan and Rare Diseases

 Leveraging Ginkgo's cell programming platform and Selecta's ImmTOR platform to create potentially transformative enzymatic therapies

Selecta gains rights to develop and commercialize select therapeutic enzymes from Ginkgo's advanced organism engineering platform to treat select auto-immune diseases

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/selecta-biosciences-ginkgo-bioworks-announce-120000741.html

Monday, October 25, 2021

Stripping Intellectual Property Rights from Covid-19 Vaccines Is Disastrous

 The Covid-19 pandemic grinds on with the Delta variant dashing hopes of a return to normalcy this fall. Throughout, politicians and activists have made a scapegoat of intellectual property rights on Covid-19 vaccines and medical treatments. They've blamed intellectual property rights as roadblocks in ending the pandemic.

Last year, the governments of India and South Africa advanced a proposal at the World Trade Organization to strip intellectual property rights from all Covid-19 vaccines and drugs. Their proposal was unsurprising, as generic drug companies are a large part of their national economies. Surprisingly, the Biden administration announced its support for their proposal last spring.

Recently, activists urged President Biden to go even further. They argued he should force companies to hand over their intellectual property using the Defense Production Act.

U.S. support for the intellectual property waiver was a surprise because the ramifications are disastrous. It's unprecedented; the United States has never wavered in its commitment to strong protection of intellectual property rights.

Intellectual property rights in the United States are what made Covid-19 vaccines and other medical treatments possible. These property rights spurred billions in private investments over decades in creating these technologies. Patents formed the basis for creating commercial agreements, manufacturing capabilities, and supply chains to deliver vaccines to patients in record time.

As a result, the healthcare response to Covid-19 has been historic. Never have biopharma companies created and distributed billions of doses of vaccines for an entirely new disease in just over a year. The risk of death from Covid-19, which has unfortunately stricken so many, has been eliminated for hundreds of millions of people due to the creation, manufacturing, and distribution in vaccines facilitated by strong patent rights.

Supporters of tossing out intellectual property rights say it will accelerate global distribution and access to vaccines. They are right that global distribution of vaccines is a problem. By September 2021, 55% of people in developed countries have been fully inoculated, but less than 1% in developing countries.

Yet waiving intellectual property rights on Covid-19 vaccines does nothing to get more shots into arms. As a European Union spokesperson said, "there is no evidence that IP rights in any way hamper access to Covid-19-related medicines and technologies."

The challenges to vaccine distribution lie elsewhere. They include trade barriers in importing and exporting vaccines, and lack of distribution infrastructure in the developing world.

The proposed intellectual property waiver doesn't solve any of these problems, and it causes many others. Dismantling international respect for intellectual property destroys a key sector of the U.S. innovation economy. It also poses a national security threat, giving foreign companies and governments carte blanche to steal American inventions.

Waiving intellectual property for Covid-19 drugs creates a precedent that global protections can be invalidated at the drop of a hat. When governments force companies to hand over their valuable patents and trade secrets, no one will be able to invest with confidence the $2.6 billion required to create the next miracle treatment for cancer or for the next pandemic disease.

Worse, the biotechnology will go everywhere in the world -- technology that can be used for good or ill. The new cutting-edge mRNA biotech platform can make vaccines, or it can make bioweapons. Under the proposed waiver, it will go to countries like China and Russia, authoritarian regimes that are strategic and economic competitors of the US.

To make more vaccines available worldwide, the United States should embrace real solutions. It should release the U.S. stockpile of millions of doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is not approved in the United States, but approved by dozens of countries globally. It should allow the export of much-needed PPE supplies, and it can assist in improving the availability of refrigerated shipping and storage for delivering vaccines in developing countries.

The Biden administration should reverse its support for the intellectual property waiver, which will wreck even more havoc than the pandemic. If it doesn't, Congress should refuse to implement any measures at home. Thankfully, members of the House have submitted an amendment to the Defense Authorization Act that would require the President to oppose any TRIPS waiver unless approved by Congress.

The world needs vaccines. Drug innovators have created them. Stripping them of their intellectual property rights does not solve distribution problems. Worse, it punishes these innovators for their heroic efforts and achievements that have saved tens of millions of lives.

Adam Mossoff is a patent law expert at George Mason University who has testified multiple times before Congress and is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute.

https://www.realclearhealth.com/articles/2021/10/22/stripping_intellectual_property_rights_from_covid-19_vaccines_is_disastrous_111262.html

African effort to replicate mRNA vaccine targets disparities

 In a pair of Cape Town warehouses converted into a maze of airlocked sterile rooms, young scientists are assembling and calibrating the equipment needed to reverse engineer a coronavirus vaccine that has yet to reach South Africa and most of the world's poorest people.

The energy in the gleaming labs matches the urgency of their mission to narrow vaccine disparities. By working to replicate Moderna's COVID-19 shot, the scientists are effectively making an end run around an industry that has vastly prioritized  over poor in both sales and manufacturing.

And they are doing it with unusual backing from the World Health Organization, which is coordinating a , training and production hub in South Africa along with a related supply chain for critical raw materials. It's a last resort effort to make doses for people going without, and the intellectual property implications are still murky.

"We are doing this for Africa at this moment, and that drives us," said Emile Hendricks, a 22-year-old biotechnologist for Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines, the company trying to reproduce the Moderna jab. "We can no longer rely on these big superpowers to come in and save us."

Some experts see reverse engineering—recreating vaccines from fragments of publicly available information—as one of the few remaining ways to redress the power imbalances of the pandemic. Only 0.7% of vaccines have gone to low-income countries so far, while nearly half have gone to wealthy countries, according to an analysis by the People's Vaccine Alliance.

That WHO, which relies upon the goodwill of wealthy countries and the pharmaceutical industry for its continued existence, is leading the attempt to reproduce a proprietary vaccine demonstrates the depths of the supply disparities.

The U.N.-backed effort to even out global vaccine distribution, known as COVAX, has failed to alleviate dire shortages in poor countries. Donated doses are coming in at a fraction of what is needed to fill the gap. Meanwhile, pressure for  to share, including Biden administration demands on Moderna, has led nowhere.

Until now, WHO has never directly taken part in replicating a novel vaccine for current global use over the objections of the original developers. The Cape Town hub is intended to expand access to the novel messenger RNA technology that Moderna, as well as Pfizer and German partner BioNTech, used in their vaccines.

"This is the first time we're doing it to this level, because of the urgency and also because of the novelty of this technology," said Martin Friede, a WHO vaccine research coordinator who is helping direct the hub.

Dr. Tom Frieden, the former head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has described the world as "being held hostage" by Moderna and Pfizer, whose vaccines are considered the most effective against COVID-19. The novel mRNA process uses the genetic code for the spike protein of the coronavirus and is thought to trigger a better immune response than traditional vaccines.

Arguing that American taxpayers largely funded Moderna's vaccine development, the Biden administration has insisted the company must expand production to help supply developing nations. The global shortfall through 2022 is estimated at 500 million and 4 billion doses, depending on how many other vaccines come on the market.

"The United States government has played a very substantial role in making Moderna the company it is," said David Kessler, the head of Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. program to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine development.

Kessler would not say how far the administration would go in pressing the company. "They understand what we expect to happen," he said.

Moderna has pledged to build a vaccine factory in Africa at some point in the future. But after pleading with drugmakers to share their recipes, raw materials and technological know-how, some poorer countries are done waiting.

Afrigen Managing Director Petro Terblanche said the Cape Town company is aiming to have a version of the Moderna vaccine ready for testing in people within a year and scaled up for commercial production not long after.

"We have a lot of competition coming from Big Pharma. They don't want to see us succeed," Terblanche said. "They are already starting to say that we don't have the capability to do this. We are going to show them."

If the team in South Africa succeeds in making a version of Moderna's vaccine, the information will be publicly released for use by others, Terblanche said. Such sharing is closer to an approach U.S. President Joe Biden championed in the spring and the pharmaceutical industry strongly opposes.

Commercial production is the point at which intellectual property could become an issue. Moderna has said it would not pursue legal action against a company for infringing on its vaccine rights, but neither has it offered to help companies that have volunteered to make its mRNA shot.

Chairman Noubar Afeyan said Moderna determined it would be better to expand production itself than to share technology and plans to deliver billions of additional doses next year.

"Within the next six to nine months, the most reliable way to make high-quality vaccines and in an efficient way is going to be if we make them," Afeyan said.

Zoltan Kis, an expert in messenger RNA vaccines at Britain's University of Sheffield, said reproducing Moderna's vaccine is "doable" but the task would be far easier if the company shared its expertise. Kis estimated the process involves fewer than a dozen major steps. But certain procedures are tricky, such as sealing the fragile messenger RNA in lipid nanoparticles, he said.

"It's like a very complicated cooking recipe," he said. "Having the recipe would be very, very helpful, and it would also help if someone could show you how to do it."

A U.N.-backed public health organization still hopes to persuade Moderna that its approach to providing vaccines for poorer countries misses the mark. Formed in 2010, the Medicines Patent Pool initially focused on convincing pharmaceutical companies to share patents for AIDS drugs.

"It's not about outsiders helping Africa," Executive Director Charles Gore said of the South Africa vaccine hub. "Africa wants to be empowered, and that's what this is about."

It will eventually fall to Gore to try to resolve the intellectual property question. Work to recreate Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine is protected as research, so a potential dispute would surround steps to sell a replicated version commercially, he said.

"It's about persuading Moderna to work with us rather than using other methods," Gore said.

He said the Medicines Patent Pool repeatedly tried but failed to convince Pfizer and BioNTech - the first companies out with an effective vaccine - to even discuss sharing their formulas.

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who is among the members of Congress backing a bill that calls on the United States to invest more in making and distributing COVID-19 vaccines in low-and middle-income countries, said reverse engineering isn't going to happen fast enough to keep the virus from mutating and spreading further.

We need to show some hustle. We have to show a sense of urgency, and I'm not seeing that urgency," he said. "Either we end this pandemic or we muddle our way through."

Campaigners argue the meager amount of vaccines available to poorer countries through donations, COVAX and purchases suggests the Western-dominated  is broken.

"The enemy to these corporations is losing their potential profit down the line," Joia Mukherjee, chief medical officer of the global health nonprofit Partners in Health, said. "The enemy isn't the virus, the enemy isn't suffering."

Back in Cape Town, the promise of using mRNA technology against other diseases motivates the .

"The excitement is around learning how we harness mRNA technology to develop a COVID-19 ," Caryn Fenner, Afrigen's technical director, said. But more important, Fenner said, "is not only using the mRNA platform for COVID, but for beyond COVID."

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-10-african-effort-replicate-mrna-vaccine.html

NYPD union sues city over vaccine mandate

 A police union representing officers in the New York Police Department (NYPD) announced on Monday that it was suing to challenge New York City's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for all city workers.

The New York City Police Benevolent Association (PBA) announced the lawsuit by sharing a letter from its president, Patrick Lynch, on Twitter.

"This morning, the PBA filed our lawsuit in Staten Island state Supreme Court seeking to overturn the vaccine mandate announced last week," Lynch's letter read.

"We will also be filing a request for a temporary restraining order asking the court to bar the City and the NYPD from implementing the mandate while out suit is pending," he added.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) last week expanded the city's COVID-19 vaccine mandate to all city workers, including employees with the NYPD. The city was also doing away with its weekly testing alternative to vaccines. City workers will be required to show proof of having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by Oct. 29.

Those who do not show proof of vaccination by Oct. 29 will be placed on unpaid leave until they get vaccinated. Workers who do show proof of vaccination will receive a $500 bonus in their next paycheck.

"We have led the way against COVID-19 — from fighting for the right to vaccinate frontline workers, to providing nation-leading incentives, to creating the Key to NYC mandate," de Blasio said last week. "As we continue our recovery for all of us, city workers have been a daily inspiration. Now is the time for them to show their city the path out of this pandemic once and for all." 

The PBA is not the only group representing New York City workers that has opposed the vaccine mandate. Last month, a group of New York City public school teachers asked the Supreme Court to block the city's vaccine mandate.

“Thousands of school teachers will lose their livelihoods if they are without pay and cannot work anywhere else, their ability to serve the children of New York City, and, of course, their ranking as teachers,” the lawyer representing the teachers, Vinoo Varghese, told The Hill at the time. 

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/578359-nypd-union-sues-city-over-vaccine-mandate

Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm: Comparative Study on Post-Vaccination Antibody Titers

 by 

 1,

 2,

 3,

 4,

 5,

 6,

 1,

 7,

 7,

 3,

 3,

 3,

 3,

 3,

 3,

 3 and

 3,*

1
Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan
2
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
3
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
4
Department of Emergency Medicine and Accidents, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
5
Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
6
School of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan
7
Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111223

PDF: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/11/1223/pdf

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccines induce immunity through different mechanisms. The aim of this study is to compare the titers of specific antibodies in subjects vaccinated with either the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine or the Sinopharm vaccine. This prospective observational cohort included Jordanian adults vaccinated with two doses, 21 days apart, of either of the two aforementioned vaccines. Titers were collected 6 weeks after the administration of the second dose. Overall, 288 participants were included, of which 141 were administered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while 147 were administered the Sinopharm vaccine. Remarkably, 140 (99.3%) of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recipients had positive IgG titers, while 126 (85.7%) of Sinopharm recipients had positive IgG (p < 0.001). The mean titer for IgG among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients was 515.5 ± 1143.5 BAU/mL, compared to 170.0 ± 230.0 BAU/mL among Sinopharm subjects (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine positively correlated with positive IgG titers (OR: 25.25; 95% CI: 3.25–196.15; p = 0.002), compared with a negative effect of cardiovascular diseases (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11–0.99; p = 0.48) on IgG titers. In conclusion, fully vaccinated recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had superior quantitative efficiency compared to Sinopharm recipients. A booster dose is supported for Sinopharm recipients, or those with chronic immunosuppressive diseases.