Search This Blog

Friday, October 21, 2022

Silverback: FDA OKs NDA for epinephrine nasal spray for Allergic Reactions including Anaphylaxis

  Silverback Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBTX) (“Silverback”) today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for review ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (ARS Pharma) New Drug Application (NDA) for neffy for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions (type I) including anaphylaxis in adults and children ≥30 kg (66 lbs). If approved by the FDA, neffy would be the first non-injectable treatment available to patients with allergic reactions (type I) including anaphylaxis.

The FDA has assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target action date that is anticipated in mid-2023.

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/silverback-therapeutics-inc-announces-the-fda-s-acceptance-of-ars-pharmaceuticals-nda-for-neffy-epinephrine-nasal-spray-for-the-treatment-of-allergic-reactions-type-i-including-anaphylaxis/

Matinas: Positive Interim Data from Phase 2 Trial of MAT2203 for Cryptococcal Meningitis

 Two-week survival in Cohort 4 (all-oral regimen) was 95% in 40 patients receiving MAT2203  

Mean Early Fungicidal Activity (EFA) of the rate of yeast clearance in cerebrospinal fluid exceeded the prespecified primary endpoint threshold of >0.20 CFU/mL, CSF/day

Favorable safety and tolerability data support longer-term use of MAT2203 with no evidence of kidney toxicity seen with 6 weeks of oral MAT2203 treatment

Overall survival data from Cohorts 2 and 4 of EnACT trial (Cohorts 1 and 3 were safety lead-ins) provide clinically meaningful evidence of the safety and efficacy of MAT2203 for both a step-down indication and an all-oral treatment regimen for cryptococcal meningitis

Phase 3 registration trial of MAT2203 for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis to commence Q1 2023

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/matinas-biopharma-announces-positive-interim-data-from-the-phase-2-enact-trial-of-mat2203-for-the-treatment-of-cryptococcal-meningitis-exceeding-primary-endpoint-threshold-patient-survival-in-all-oral-cohort-4-regimen-currently-90-percent-/

BriaCell: Successful Completion of Phase I Portion of Clinical Study in Advanced Breast Cancer

 

  • BriaCell has successfully completed its Phase I safety and tolerability evaluation of Bria-IMT™ in combination with Incyte’s retifanlimab in advanced breast cancer.
  • The combination treatment showed a favorable safety profile in 12 patients.
  • Phase II efficacy portion of the study, under FDA’s fast track designation, now underway with survival data and clinical benefit being compiled.

Gene Therapy could Change the Goalpost in Sickle Cell Disease

 Despite a recent spate of FDA approvals for sickle cell disease (SCD), there is still significant unmet need for patients – namely, a treatment that can correct the culprit behind the disease. This may be where experimental gene therapies can play a significant role.

SCD has been called the world’s oldest-known hereditary disease. Affecting an estimated 100 million people across the globe, it is caused by a mutation in the β-globin gene that leads to the production of abnormal sickle hemoglobin.

The Current SCD Landscape

There are multiple drugs already approved by the FDA for the treatment of SCD. In 2017, Endari (L-glutamine oral powder), developed by Emmaus Life Sciences, became the first new SCD treatment in nearly 20 years.

Another milestone occurred in 2019, when the FDA greenlit Oxbryta (voxelotor), developed by Global Blood Therapeutics. Oxbryta was considered the first medicine aimed at the root of the disease.

That same year, Novartis received approval for Adakveo (crizanlizumab-tmca) to reduce the frequency of vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), or pain crises, in adults and children aged 16 years and older with SCD. And just last year, Chiesi’s Ferriprox received expanded approval to treat transfusional iron overload caused by SCD or other anemias.

While worthy advances, companies such as Graphite Biobluebird bioVertex Pharmaceuticals and Editas Medicine have loftier ambitions in SCD.

Graphite Bio Doses First Patient with Nula-cel

Josh Lehrer, M.D., CEO of Bay Area-based Graphite Bio, is no stranger to SCD. He was part of the Global Blood Therapeutics team that developed Oxbryta.

Even when Oxbryta was winning FDA approval, Lehrer told BioSpace he and his colleagues believed more could be done to address the underlying cause of SCD. With nulabeglogene autogedtemcel (nula-cel), Lehrer believes we are now closer to that reality.

Graphite Bio dosed its first patient with nula-cel in the Phase I/II CEDAR trial. Nula-cel is the first therapy to be administered to any kind of patient that has the potential to correct a genetic mutation and change a gene to the normal version, Lehrer said. 

Although multiple companies are working on gene therapies for SCD, Lehrer said nula-cel is a different approach. He likened the therapy to a word processor that can go back into a misspelling and correct the word. The correction offered by nula-cel will provide patients with a normal genotype and potentially lead to a cure, he said.

“The ideal solution is to directly fix it (the genotype), change the DNA at the patient level,” Lehrer said. “Without that change, people will still be able to pass along the gene to descendants.”

While there are three distinct forms of the disease, Lehrer speculated that nula-cel, should it work as intended, will be an effective treatment for all patients. Graphite Bio anticipates initial proof-of-concept data from the CEDAR trial in mid-2023.

bluebird Readies BLA for Lovo-cel

While SCD was known as the first genetic disease, Rich Colvin, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer of bluebird bio, said research into the illness has lagged behind what has been seen in other diseases.

“The disease is complicated. It sounds simple but they (abnormal blood cells) are circulating everywhere in the body and create issues everywhere,” Colvin told BioSpace.

What complicates the issue are the VOCs that lead to significant pain. People experience pain in the lungs or other organs because cells are bunching up and not flowing through the organs as they should. While there are drugs such as Adakveo aimed at VOCs, Colvin said by and large, medical experts have been “putting Band-Aids on the issue rather than trying to solve it.”

That’s where bluebird’s lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel) could play a significant role.

Although currently under a partial clinical hold for patients under the age of 18, bluebird’s experimental LentiGlobin gene therapy for SCD has been administered to more than 50 patients with nearly eight years of follow-up data. Of those patients, Colvin said one of the cohorts will be of particular interest to the FDA when it evaluates the company’s Biologics License Application.

The registrational cohort includes approximately 30 patients. At the time of the BLA filing, which is expected in early 2023, Colvin said the patients will have a median of 26 months of efficacy follow-up and more than four and a half years of follow-up for some.

Those patients experienced complete resolution of severe vaso-occlusive events, which Colvin called a transformative outcome. Some have a history of as many as 25 severe VOEs in the years prior to treatment with lovo-cel, Colvin noted. “We’re seeing real clinical outcomes,” he said.

To date, the FDA has granted lovo-cel Orphan Drug designation, Fast Track designation, Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy designation and Rare Pediatric Disease designation.

Vertex and CRISPR Plan Exa-cel BLA

Last month, Vertex and partner CRISPR Therapeutics announced plans to submit a BLA for exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) in November. The submission will be part of a rolling review for the regulatory agency and is expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter in 2023.

Exa-cel is being developed for both sickle cell and beta-thalassemia, another blood disorder.

An autologous, ex vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited therapy, exa-cel edits a patient’s own hematopoietic stem cells to produce high levels of fetal hemoglobin.

Editas’ SCD Therapy Shows Early Promise

This summer, Editas shared a positive update from its gene therapy EDIT-301. The therapy, currently being studied in the Phase I/II RUBY trial, is designed to edit the HBG1/2 promoter to disrupt the binding site of BCL11a and ameliorate symptoms of SCD.

Editas CMO Baisong Mei, M.D., Ph.D. told BioSpace the company is studying the three types of severe SCD patients.

In July, Editas announced the dosing and confirmed successful neutrophil and platelet engraftment of the first patient in the trial. The company simultaneously announced it had successfully edited CD34+ cells from patients in preparation for reinfusion and remains on track to announce top-line clinical data by year-end.

"Successful neutrophil and platelet engraftment is an important signal to tell us EDIT-301 is working because it means that the cells reinfused to a patient have been accepted by the patient’s body and have begun to function and create new blood cells as intended," Mei said. 

EDIT-301 was awarded Rare Pediatric Disease designation for the treatment of both SCD and beta thalassemia.

These experimental gene therapies have the potential to transform the treatment landscape of the millions of people with SCD across the world should they be approved.

“This is an exciting time in sickle cell,” Colvin said. He noted that bluebird and other companies are committed to addressing this disease that has gone under-served for a long time.

https://www.biospace.com/article/gene-therapies-could-change-the-goal-in-sickle-cell-disease-/

FDA Releases Much-Anticipated Guidance around Trial Endpoints

 The FDA released guidelines Thursday in an attempt to clarify processes for assessing a drug candidate’s efficacy while simultaneously examining several endpoints.

Having more than one principal measure for a candidate’s efficacy poses unique analytical problems, according to the FDA.

The document outlined the agency’s new process for interpreting the results of clinical trials that employ multiple primary endpoints.

For instance, a molecule that meets only one of a series of independent efficacy metrics could mistakenly be concluded as effective. Meanwhile, a compound that fails to impact a combination of several measures could be prematurely deemed ineffective.

“When more than one endpoint is analyzed in a single trial, the likelihood of making false conclusions about a drug’s effects with respect to one or more of those endpoints could increase if there is no appropriate adjustment for multiplicity,” the FDA wrote in the report.

Some diseases have more than one symptom or manifestation that are critical to their pathology, and employing a single efficacy endpoint wouldn’t accurately determine if a drug is effective. In these cases, the FDA would assess compounds using two or more independent metrics, which it calls co-primary endpoints, that must be satisfied.

Recent Wins and Losses Due to Multiple Endpoints

In its briefing document, the FDA gave migraines as an example, pointing out that while pain is indeed the condition’s defining symptom, several others—such as nausea and light sensitivity—are also clinically important.

In December 2021, migraine leader Biohaven Pharmaceutical cleared this co-primary endpoint bar in a Phase III study of its intranasal migraine hopeful zavegepant. The study, which enrolled 1,405 adult patients, assessed whether Biohaven’s candidate could hit two independent efficacy measures: pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at two hours.

The FDA accepted Zavegepant’s new drug application in May.

The issue of proving efficacy on multiple fronts is what ultimately tripped up Biogen’s and Eisai’s Alzheimer’s disease drug Aduhelm (aducanumab).

Though it eventually received the FDA’s greenlight in June 2021, becoming the first-ever approved drug for Alzheimer’s disease, the drug has been marred by widespread skepticism and controversy.

The drug failed to make much traction in practical use. In April, after some 10 months of controversy, U.S. medical insurers strongly limited their reimbursement guidelines for Aduhelm, which crippled its uptake. A few months later, Biogen and Eisai abandoned a post-market observational study of the drug, citing low enrollment.

Aduhelm hit one efficacy endpoint, but didn’t conclusively do so for others.

“Many diseases have multiple sequelae, and an effect demonstrated on any one of these aspects could support a conclusion of effectiveness,” the FDA wrote in Thursday’s guidance document. “Selecting and focusing on just one of these sequelae is insufficient, while choosing many, while pathologically more appropriate, could be problematic.”

https://www.biospace.com/article/fda-releases-much-anticipated-guidance-around-trial-endpoints/

NeuBase in Gene Editing Research Agreement with 'Global Healthcare Company'

 NeuBase Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: NBSE) (“NeuBase” or the “Company”), a biotechnology platform company Drugging the Genome™ to address disease at the base level using a new class of precision genetic medicines, today announced a research agreement with a Top 10 Global Healthcare company (“Healthcare Company”) (based on 2021 revenues). For this research, the Healthcare Company will evaluate NeuBase’s PATrOL™ technology for three monogenic genetic diseases.

NeuBase’s PATrOL™ platform is a PNA-based technology designed to address disease at the root of causality to help patients with rare and common diseases by editing, upregulating, or downregulating gene function. PATrOL™ gene editing is differentiated in that it does not require bacterial enzymes (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9), which potentially increases fidelity and reduces immunogenicity to provide a safer solution to patients for in vivo gene editing.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/neubase-therapeutics-announces-gene-editing-120000582.html

Pfizer COVID vaccine price hike seen giving revenue boost for years

 Pfizer's plan to as much as quadruple current U.S. prices for its COVID-19 vaccines going forward could spur revenue for years, analysts said.

The drugmaker, which developed and sells the vaccine with Germany's BioNTech said on Thursday evening that it is targeting a range of $110 to $130 a dose for the vaccine once the United States moves to a commercial market next year.

Outside the United States, Pfizer said it already has contracts with governments in many developed markets that extend through 2023 with prices that have already been set.

Wells Fargo analyst Mohit Bansal said the new pricing range could add around $2.5 billion to $3 billion in annual revenue for the shots.

"This is much higher than our assumption of $50 per shot and even assuming $80 per shot net price in high-income countries, we see $2 per share upside to our estimates" from the new prices, he wrote in a research note.

The public announcement of the new price range could also be a green light for competitors Moderna Inc and Novavax Inc to strive for prices in the same range.

"We expect Moderna to adapt to this signal," SVB Securities analyst David Risinger said in a research note, adding that he sees Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Novavax "pricing in a similar range for the foreseeable future."

Moderna had previously suggested commercial price expectations in a range of $64 to $100 a shot.

Wall Street was expecting such price hikes due to weak demand for COVID vaccines, which meant manufacturers would need to hike prices to meet revenue forecasts for 2023 and beyond.

So far, the U.S. rollout of updated COVID-19 booster shots that target both the original version of the coronavirus and circulating Omicron subvariants has lagged last year's rate despite more people being eligible for the shots.

Around 19.4 million people in the United States received the updated booster over the first seven weeks of its rollout. In the first seven weeks of the 2021 revaccination campaign, over 27 million people received their third shot even though only older and immunocompromised people were eligible at that point.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-pfizer-covid-vaccine-price-150245452.html