Search This Blog

Thursday, July 4, 2024

Gangs, crime, terrible living conditions included in new look into Whitewater, WI immigration ills

 A new report says Whitewater’s immigration problems did not end when the city’s police chief sent a letter to the White House late last year.

The Institute for Reforming Government on Monday released a report that uses 400 open records requests to paint a picture of the continued problems that a flood of illegal immigrants has caused in Whitewater.

“The city has struggled to deal with the increasing strain on law enforcement resources, housing overcapacity, and the challenges associated with educating children with no formal background in schooling and often lacking basic English skills,” the report states in its opening.

Stay
volume_off
-5:00
sd
closed_caption
fullscreen
Auto (225p)
225p
360p
Subtitles Off
Subtitles EN
English

IRG combed through emails, letters, body camera footage and internal city of Whitewater reports to get a sense of just how an influx of about 1,000 people from Nicaragua has impacted what was a sleepy college town of about 15,000.

“Unlike ‘sanctuary cities,’ it does not appear the city of Whitewater sought the immigrants,” the report adds. “Instead, the city’s ‘theory’ explaining the sudden influx revolves around a complex web of ample student housing following COVID, a need for farm and manufacturing labor, and the congregation of sponsor families in and around the city that were then identified by migrants at the border.”

IRG Director of Oversight Jacob Curtis says Whitewater is just one example of what President Biden’s immigration policies are doing to towns and cities across the country.

“Because of a completely broken federal immigration system, local units of government like the city of Whitewater are now being forced to manage a crisis that impacts almost every facet of government operations,” Curtis said.

The report details at least one known MS13 gang member who was living in Whitewater.

The city’s police chief wrote to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, seeking guidance for what to do with the gang member, as well as others who have court dates in Chicago and less-than-clear immigration status.

The IRG report also notes that immediately after the letter from Sen. police chief Congressman Bryan Steil, R-Wisconsin, and Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin followed up with the White House. There were also meetings with Gov. Tony Evers’ office, but Whitewater pushed to keep those meetings quiet to “avoid the press.”

IRG’s report says Whitewater continues to deal with many of the problems laid out in the police chief’s letter in December. And, the report says, there doesn’t appear to be an end in sight.

“Overall, many of the communications, particularly those from the police chief, make clear the city has attempted to balance maintaining an objective posture on a highly charged public policy debate while recognizing the clear impact the influx of immigrants is having on the city’s ability to protect its residents, ensure a quality public education for the city’s school children, and maintain fiscal solvency,” the report’s conclusion states. “Unless and until the federal government repairs the nation’s utterly broken immigration infrastructure, local units of government like those in Whitewater, Wisconsin will be left to respond to the federal government’s continued failures.”

https://www.thecentersquare.com/wisconsin/article_ced4ef4c-325c-11ef-b795-a71383c02b78.html

New evidence to Congress disputes Hunter Biden testimony about controversial firm

 Already accused of lying to Congress about other issues, Hunter Biden's February impeachment inquiry testimony distancing himself from a controversial securities firm directly conflicts with evidence the FBI seized years ago, including his signature on an employment contract that made him the firm's vice chairman.

The documents were gathered by FBI and SEC agents back in 2016 and were recently obtained by Congress and shared with Just the News, but not until after Hunter Biden had already given his deposition in February to the U.S. House as part of his father's impeachment inquiry.

The growing conflicts between evidence now in lawmakers' possession and the stories the Biden camp continually gives to America and Congress are becoming of increasing interest to lawmakers.

This is especially true regarding the Burnham Asset Management firm that was embroiled in a criminal securities fraud case back in 2016 and also was used by Hunter Biden's business partners to help a controversial Russian oligarch a decade ago.

Hunter Biden testified to Congress in February that he never became part of the Burnham investment. “And did you have any active participation in Burnham, either as an equity holder, director, or officer?” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., asked Biden in his impeachment inquiry deposition earlier this year.

“No. I don't think that ever came to fruition. I think that there was a proposal that I'd be a part of that, but it all fell apart in all of this,” Biden replied, referring to the federal securities fraud charges against his partners, Devon Archer and Jason Galanis. The two partners were convicted but Hunter Biden was never charged.

Yet, the newly obtained documents show Hunter Biden was in fact working for Burnham during the same time period. An employment agreement signed by Hunter Biden shows he was named the Vice Chairman of Burnham Asset Management and was to be awarded an $800,000 salary, according to the document, which was also signed by then-CEO Jon Burnham in April 2015.

“Burnham hereby hires the Employee, as Vice Chairman and Senior Managing Director, of Burnham,” the agreement reads.

The FBI's longtime signature expert reviewed the employment document at the request of Just the News and confirmed the signature was indeed Hunter Biden's, matching it to numerous other public documents he signed over the years that included his Social Security card. 

"Selecting from those samples, all of them bore similarity with the signature on the Burnham Access Management Employment Agreement," retired Agent Wayne Barnes reported to Just the News. "But there is one which is so close to the current questioned signature that it is all that is needed for today’s conclusion. It is the signature Hunter Biden wrote on his Social Security card dated 9/20/12."

You can read Barnes' analysis here. 

Other documents in the FBI collection also show Hunter Biden's direct involvement in Burnham's matters,

For instance, a contemporaneous "Letter of Intent" shows that Hunter Biden’s employment at Burnham was part of a deal that also acquired two of his firms, Rosemont Seneca Advisors and RSP Investments. The plan was to roll Rosemont’s business into the wider Burnham umbrella under Burnham Asset Management or Burnham Securities. The letter confirms Biden’s salary and promised an “earned/buy-in equity plan for each employee” of his old firms, the documents show.

Emails also show that on occasion Hunter Biden responded to business deals involving Burnham. For example, Hunter Biden emailed a Chinese businessman named Henry Zhao about the partnership with Burnham and implied that he was now officially a part of the venture.

“Henry-I am so glad to hear that we have concluded our joint venture between Harvest and Burnham,” Biden wrote. “This is an exciting milestone and I look forward to helping building a cross border institution that helps investors in our respective countries across the globe.”

In another instance in June 2015, Biden received a welcome communication from Burnham, instructing him how to set up his company email, phone, and computer, according to a record obtained by Just the News.

And in November 2015, just months after his official onboarding as vice chairman, Biden was copied on an email chain where partners discussed the visit of Zhao and his partners to the Burnham offices in New York City. In this email, the partners used Biden's new Burnham email address.

 

The new evidence has caught the attention of lawmakers, including Biggs who told Just the News he thinks Congress should refer Hunter Biden to the DOJ for additional prosecution.

"It's no longer a surprise when one finds out that Hunter Biden has lied to you," Biggs said. "It's not even a surprise that he would lie during a formal congressional interview. Truth seems to be a stranger to him," Biggs said.

"I'm hoping that Congress takes further action on the Biden family and their propensity to abuse power and lie to members of Congress," he added,

Abbe Lowell, lawyer for Hunter Biden, did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News.

The efforts to obscure Hunter Biden's involvement with Burnham and its controversies go back years, well before his testimony.

Archer and Galanis were charged in May 2016 in a $60 million bonds fraud scheme while they were working at Burnham. According to the Justice Department, the pair, along with several other co-defendants, defrauded an Oglala Sioux Native American tribal entity by inducing it to issue bonds, but then failed to invest them as they promised.

The fraud was carried out from March 2014 to April 2016, according to the Justice Department. Archer and Galanis were ultimately convicted, though a judge recently ruled that Archer should be re-sentenced.

In the wake of their arrests, Hunter Biden's then-lawyer George Mesires said in a statement that his client immediately moved to distance himself from the firm, claiming the pair had used Biden's name without his knowledge.

“The defendants...invoked and used Hunter’s name—without his knowledge—to lend their business venture more credibility,” Mesires said, according to the Wall Street Journal. “As soon as Hunter learned of the illegal conduct, and that his name was being used in this unauthorized and inappropriate manner, Hunter took immediate steps to ensure that his business interests would not be associated with the Burnham Group or with any of the defendants." 

Despite that, The Wall Street Journal also reported that Archer’s attorney, Matthew L. Schwartz, said during the trial that Hunter Biden “was part of this deal."

More than a year before Hunter Biden officially became a part of Burnham, Biden's partners, including Archer and Galanis, sought to overcome a federal watch list that was preventing a potential investor, Russian oligarch Yelena Baturina, from pouring resources into the new Burnham venture. Emails show that Archer and Galanis worked with contacts at Morgan Stanley in order to help Baturina secure a U.S.-based bank account in January of 2014, Just the News previously reported. 

Later that year, Baturina would wire $3.5 million to Rosemont Realty --another project tied to Hunter Biden's partners --just weeks before she dined with then-Vice President Joe Biden at the Cafe Milano restaurant in Georgetown, Just the News reported. Despite this, the president insisted on national television that he never met any of his son's business partners or discussed business with him.

Other foreign business partners of Hunter Biden, including oligarchs from Kazakhstan, were also in attendance with the president. Galanis told Congress that he worked through Burnham to secure a U.S. account for Baturina precisely so she could invest further in the group's "new projects," that is, Burnham.  

"I previously met Ms. Baturina in February 2014 when Devon Archer asked me to help open her a U.S. bank account. She had invested at least $105 million from Rosemont Realty by that time, which was a Devon Archer investment vehicle. She was having trouble opening a U.S. bank account based on reports of her ties to criminal figures in Russia and corruption allegations related to her politician husband," Galanis said in his deposition. 

"Our efforts were to help her open a bank account, done with the understanding that she would provide more funding to our new projects," he added. 

Later in 2014, and still months before Hunter Biden officially signed his employment agreement, Burnham appeared eager to broadcast the future first son’s association with the company. One December 2014 Burnham pitch book outlining the group’s plans identified Biden as part of the “highly experienced” team the company was trying to assemble. This was not the last time that trading on the Biden name would become the go-to business model.

The presentation highlighted the benefits of acquiring Biden’s firms including access to his financially powerful Chinese connections through Bohai Harvest RST and enjoying “more day to day engagement by our Chairman and Biden.”

The slide deck was set to be presented to Harvest Global Investments which was headed by Zhao, the Chinese business executive. Emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop and witness testimony at the impeachment inquiry show Zhao was keen on partnering with Burnham and Biden because of the value of the Biden family name and the access it would provide, Just the News previously reported.

Another email first reported by investigative author Peter Schweizer in his book, "Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win" show that Zhao was primarily interested in partnering with Burnham because of Hunter Biden’s proposed involvement.

“Henry we believe, is still interested in doing the JV deal if a fair evaluation of Burnham can be agreed to and if YOU as a deal maker are inside Burnham,” one partner wrote to Hunter Biden in October 2014. “Henry holds you in very high regard.”

Biden and Archer also planned to form another Burnham-connected entity, this time a joint venture with controversial Burisma Holdings founder Mykola Zlochevsky, which would be headquartered in Liechtenstein and serve as Burisma’s expansion vehicle abroad, Just the News reported last week.

The venture was set to be capitalized by Zlochevsky with $120 million investment and the new Burnham entity—Burnham Energy Security LLC—was slated to get a quarter of the new venture's net revenues without putting up any cash.

When the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began to investigate the tribal bond transactions in 2016, the agency was also aware of Hunter Biden’s apparent affiliation because it subpoenaed him for documents related to his involvement with Rosemont Seneca Bohai, according to a letter from congressional investigators to the SEC. Rosemont Seneca Bohai was a firm jointly utilized by Biden and Archer via a “handshake 50-50 ownership” agreement, Archer testified earlier this year. According to investigators, the firm carried out at least one transaction of tribal bonds related to the scheme.

Hunter Biden’s lawyers responded to the subpoena by producing more than 1,700 responsive documents, Congress says. But, the lawyers also reportedly invoked his father’s name to urge the agency to keep his association with the partners and companies at the center of the investigation private.

“The confidential nature of this investigation is very important to our client and it would be unfair, not just to our client, but also to his father, the Vice President of the United States, if his involvement in an SEC investigation and parallel criminal probe were to become the subject of any media attention,” Biden’s lawyers wrote the SEC after turning over documents, according to records on file with the committee. Indeed, Biden’s affiliation with Burnham was never addressed by prosecutors publicly.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/hunter-biden-signed-employment-agreement-firm-he-distanced-himself

Animal Farm Democrats

 by Victor Davis Hanson

Leftists make up things as they go along, as yesterday’s heresies (e.g., Biden seems demented) become today’s orthodoxies (e.g. Biden really is demented)—depending on the current party directive about what is most advantageous. So many of the Democrats current dilemmas are self-inflicted— a result of their often illegal and always unethical efforts to warp democracy that boomerang upon them and remind us that hubris really does earn nemesis. Note that there would never have been any presidential immunity suit before the Supreme Court had the Biden administration just not orchestrated local, state, and federal prosecutors to neuter Trump, Joe Biden’s 2024 presidential opponent. That current lawfare effort marked the third sequential attempt to sabotage a political opponent’s campaign—following Hillary’s 2016 Russian “collusion”/Steele “dossier” scam, and Joe’s 2020 Russian “disinformation”/ “51 intelligence authorities” ruse. In other words, had Nathan Wade not synchronized with the White House counsel’s office, had Merrick Garland not had his third-ranking federal prosecutor take over the Manhattan prosecution from the incompetent Alvin Bragg, and had not Garland picked the biased and previously failed special counsel Jack Smith to hound and rush to judgement Trump, the question of presidential immunity from Biden’s orchestrated lawfare would have never come up before the court. The leftwing panic over Biden’s cognitive decline in the debate is not because he is clearly unable to fulfill the duties of a president (is there any other job in America that Joe Biden could perform other than being in charge of the nuclear codes?), and thus might injure the country. The hysteria instead arises solely because he might lose the Democrats power, either by losing the election—or by winning it, then crashing, and passing the country off into the hands of a cackling Kamala Harris. Joe Biden should rejoice over the Supreme Court immunity ruling. After all, as president he knowingly and unlawfully kept classified files in his numerous private residences. He only came forward in fear—after siccing a special counsel after Trump for the same alleged crimes—that someone might ask whether Joe himself had such files. Remember also that Biden’s ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer was illegally given access to the files by Biden, and then in Hillary-style defied a federal subpoena by destroying taped evidence of such breaches—and with complete impunity. Had the Democrats not gone berserk when Robert Hur found Biden indictable, save for his cognitive decline that would supposedly win him sympathy from a nullifying jury, and instead simply had agreed that Joe was near senile, and thus should have been indicted, then they would have had months and a real primary to have selected a living, breathing candidate. Given the Harris dilemma—will any future presidential candidate ever again demagogue before the convention by boasting that he would pick his VP running-mate on the basis of race and gender (unless he is an incumbent facing conviction and removal, and thus envisions a mediocre VP candidate as an insurance policy)? Why after years of the left caricaturing the Trump orange dermis, did an ashen Joe Biden reemerge bright Trumpian orange after his disastrous debate? Will any leftist ever again caricature the Trump tan that apparently now has offered a model of recovery for an in-extremis pallid Biden? Will this start a trend—emerge after a disastrous performance bright orange to reassure the nation you are A-Ok? How could Chuck Schumer now grandstand and seriously say anything about Supreme Court decorum? In 2020 at the head of a frenzied pro-abortion throng, he threatented two justices by name and implied violence upon their persons? (“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you”)? Months later protestors, showed up illegally—but exempt from arrest given the conservative targets of their intimidation—at the homes of the justices, among them a would-be assassin. The more Democrats grow hysterical, thrash about, and connive, all the more so they self-destruct.

https://x.com/VDHanson/status/1808634918723014685

Should South Park: The End of Obesity Be Required Viewing in Medical School?

 Yes, there's still much to find offensive, but South Park: The End of Obesity, in just 51 minutes, does more to explain some of obesity's realities, its pharmacotherapy, and weight bias than the mainstream media has done perhaps ever. 

The mini-movie follows the plight of Eric Cartman, the fictional South Parkian child with severe obesity. 

South Park got everything right. The movie starts in a medical center where discussions with Cartman, his mother, and his doctor make it clear that obesity isn't something that Cartman chose and is perhaps the most distressing aspect of his life. This certainly echoes study findings which report that quality-of-life scores in children with severe obesity are lower than those of children with newly diagnosed on-treatment cancers. As to how obesity erodes a child's quality of life, no doubt part of its impact stems from obesity being a top source of schoolyard bullying, which is reflected by Cartman as he imagines his life without it. 

Cartman's mother explains that of course they've tried diet and exercise, but that intentional behavior change alone hasn't been sufficient to sustainably move the scale's needle — a truth for the vast majority of people with obesity. But here, unlike in many actual doctors' offices, Cartman's doctor doesn't spend time doubting or cajoling; instead, he does his job — which is to inform his patient, without judgment, about a pharmaceutical option that has been proven to be beneficial. He accurately describes these medications as ushering in "a whole new era of medicine, a miracle really" that can "help people lose vast amounts of weight."

The kicker, though, comes next. The doctor explains that insurance companies only cover the medications for patients with diabetes, "so if you can't afford them, you're just kind of out of luck." This is changing somewhat now, at least here in Canada, where two of our main private insurers have changed their base coverages to make antiobesity medications something employers need to opt out of rather than opt into, but certainly they're not covered by US Medicare for weight management, nor by our version of the same here in Canada.

But even for those who have coverage, there are hoops to jump through, which is highlighted by the incredible efforts made by Cartman and his friends to get his insurance plan to cover the medications. Thwarted at every turn, despite the undeniable benefits of these medications to health and quality of life, they are forced to turn to compounding — a phenomenon certainly pervasive here in North America whereby compounding pharmacies claim to be able to provide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs with comparable efficacy at a fraction of the price, but without the same rigor of proof of purity or efficacy. 

Also covered by South Park is that the GLP-1 analog supply is impacted by use by people who don't meet approved medical criteria and are using the medications for aesthetic purposes. This speaks to the incredible societal pressure to be thin and to the comfort of some physicians to inappropriately prescribe these medications. This is covered by the subplot of South Park's weed farmer, Randy, who in turn delivers an important insight into how it feels to use a GLP-1 analog: "I think there's something wrong with these drugs…I feel satisfied. With any drugs I want to do more and more, but with these drugs I feel like I want things less. With these drugs you don't really crave anything." The sentiment is echoed by Cartman, who exclaims, "I think I'm full. I've never known that feeling before in my life, but I'm full."

It's remarkable that South Park, a show built on serving up politically incorrect offense, covers obesity and its treatment with more accuracy, nuance, and compassion than does society as a whole. The show notes that obesity is a biological condition (it is), that when it comes to health (in America) "you have to have some f-ing willpower." But where they explicitly mean having willpower in terms of filing and pursing insurance claims (you do), explains that drug companies are making antiobesity medications more expensive in America than anywhere else in the world (they are), and finally delivers this quote, which, while missing the biological basis of behavior and hunger with respect to obesity, certainly sums up why blame has no place in the discourse:

"We have sugar companies, pharmaceutical companies, and insurance companies all just trying to figure out how to make money off our health. It isn't fair to put the blame on anyone for their weight."

No, it's not.

This movie should be required viewing in medical schools. 

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/should-south-park-end-obesity-be-required-viewing-medical-2024a1000by5

Weight Gain From Discontinuing GLP-1s a Concern in Pregnancy

 With glucagon peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) drugs known to have a rapid rebound of weight gain upon discontinuation, women who stop using the drugs prior to pregnancy, as is recommended, show significantly greater pregnancy weight gain than those not exposed to the drugs, at a time when excessive weight gain presents added risks, new research showed.

"Many individuals exceed the body mass index (BMI)-based recommended gestational weight guidelines in pregnancy [upon discontinuation]," senior author Camille E. Powe, MD, an associate professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, told Medscape Medical News.

"Clinicians should counsel their patients that they may gain more weight during pregnancy if they use these medications before pregnancy," she said.

The research was presented at the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 84th Scientific Sessions.

The findings are from a retrospective cohort study that Powe and her colleagues conducted, which identified 188 singleton pregnancies between 2016 and 2022 among women with preexisting type 2 diabetes.

Women with and without prior GLP-1 RA use were matched 1:3 (one exposed pregnancy to three unexposed pregnancies) with propensity score matching on the basis of factors including prepregnancy BMI, maternal age, gestational age at delivery, race and ethnicity, and health insurance status.

In total, 47 had prepregnancy exposure to GLP-1 receptor agonists, and 141 had no exposure.

The women had a mean maternal age of 34.5 years and a mean prepregnancy BMI of 35.5.

The results showed that those with GLP-1 RA preexposure had a mean gestational weight gain of 24.9 lb vs a gain of 19.1 lb in the unexposed group (P = .03), with 61.7% in the GLP-1 RA-exposed group exceeding the recommended gestational weight gain vs 41.1% in the unexposed group (P = .02).

Excessive Weight Gain Concerns

Specific concerns of excessive weight gain in pregnancy include that extra weight gain in pregnancy is linked to an increased risk for outcomes including gestational diabetes, macrosomia [giving birth to a baby > 4 kg], cesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Powe explained.

"Each of these outcomes carries morbidity for the pregnant individual and their baby," she said.

The recommendation to take an action that is almost guaranteed to cause rapid weight gain just before conception is therefore a significant risk for its own, Maisa N. Feghali, MD, an assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, added in speaking on the issue at the meeting.

"While this strategy may avoid direct drug exposure, it essentially sets up our patients to be in the most accelerated phase of weight gain just as they are embarking on their early pregnancy," she said.

Furthermore, "we have to keep in mind that these are not patients that are going to go down to a baseline risk of the general population," Feghali noted.

If untreated, "the baseline risk of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes or diabetes in general and pregnancy outcomes such as congenital malformations is quite significant," she said.

Pregnancy Risks for GLP-1 RAs Unknown

Meanwhile, the risks for GLP-1 RAs in pregnancy have not been determined, and while some studies involving mice have suggested effects such as reduced fetal weight or growth rates, Feghali noted that those studies have had confounders such as mice receiving doses up to 10-fold higher than used in humans; their weight loss was, in some studies, more than 50%, which is not typically seen in humans, and most animal models did not have diabetes.

Until the true risks are understood, the recommendations not to use GLP-1s in pregnancy are clearly necessary, but yet another concern is exposure to the drugs in pregnancy, not because women intentionally ignored the recommendations but because they didn't know they were pregnant.

Not only are unplanned pregnancies already exceptionally high, estimated at more than 50% in the United States, but that proportion could further rise if the suspicions are true about GLP-RAs having the additional effect of increasing fertility, a phenomenon dubbed "Ozempic babies."

For those women, weeks may go by during the earliest stage of pregnancy in which there is maternal and fetal exposure to the drugs.

"Prenatal care often doesn't start till about 8-10 weeks, so by the time patients have initiated their prenatal care, they've already gone through organogenesis, and any effect that has happened is already behind us, translating to unintended fetal exposures," Fenghali said.

Asked by an audience member how she advises patients in terms of discontinuing the drugs while trying to prevent the excessive weight gain in the more ideal scenario of being able to plan ahead, Feghali responded that "what we try to do is work with patients so that they get to a status quo of weight at least for 6 months, if there is the possibility of doing that before approaching pregnancy."

"At that point, I would feel more comfortable, and we know that timing of weight gain makes a big difference," she added. "I would rather take my chances with later weight gain than early weight gain."

Ultimately, however, "GLP-1 RA use and pregnancy has become a very common issue and increasingly, we're going to be having more and more of this conversation with our patients," Feghali added.

Powe and Feghali had no disclosures to report related to the study.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/weight-gain-discontinuing-glp-1s-concern-pregnancy-2024a1000cea