Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Harris tries to distance herself from Biden in yet another policy flip-flop

 Vice President Kamala Harris is furiously trying to “distance” herself from President Biden’s record — while also disavowing the far-left policies she heartily embraced just a few years ago.

The result is a campaign run entirely on style over substance since Harris took the Democratic mantle from Biden last month.

And Democratic campaign operatives warn that she risks voters catching on — and realizing she’s selling only cynical political opportunism.

“It’s a marketing strategy that is TV-esque,” one senior Democratic aide said. “With such a short timeline now, policy matters less than personality.

One Democratic operative told The Post Wednesday that Harris was wisely breaking with Biden due to his “horrible” polling numbers.Getty Images

“She’s going to almost exclusively look at a voter like a consumer — and sell, sell, sell!” the aide quipped.

“Do I think that’s a long-term strategy? No,” the aide admitted. “But I think the plan is win and figure it out.”

Another Democratic campaign operative told The Post Wednesday that Harris was wisely trying to break with Biden’s economic policies due to his “horrible” polling numbers — and is prepared to jettison any of their administration’s talking points that don’t have “strong” public support.

At the same time, Harris, 59, is also seemingly rejecting a host of her own progressive pet projects that she touted during her failed 2020 presidential bid — including support for Medicare for All, banning fracking and legalizing illegal immigration.

Critics attacked Harris from both sides of the party four years ago — with the Biden campaign mocking her Medicare flip-flop in particular as a “have-it-every-which-way” plan, and aides for Democratic socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) slamming her policy stances as having been “cobbled together to address various poll numbers,” Politico reported.

“As far as Harris distancing from Biden, she was going to do that,” the campaign operative said, noting that Democrats have been energized by the opportunity to redefine the 2024 race.Bloomberg via Getty Images

Now, she’s trying to burnish her moderate credentials by talking about inflation and the high cost of goods head on, while also embracing Trump’s pledge to not tax tips for service and hospitality workers in key battleground states like Nevada.

“As far as Harris distancing from Biden, she was going to do that,” the campaign operative said, noting that Democrats have been energized by the opportunity to redefine the 2024 race.

“It wasn’t called Harrisflation,” the operative added, referencing the “Bidenflation” moniker that Republicans have branded on the 81-year-old president as the US surged in 2022 to a 40-year high in consumer prices.

Meanwhile the hits she’s taken for being aloof on policy and dodging major media interviews for almost a month after Biden’s departure has been strategic on her part, the senior Democratic aide said, giving her a chance to “to get her story straight later.”

Harris advisers spilled to Axios on Wednesday that the presidential pick, who was elevated to presumtive nominee solely by winning over party bosses, isn’t afraid to lean into the policy reversals.

“It’s no different than [Gov.] Kathy Hochul’s about-face on congestion pricing,” Rockland County Republican Rep. Mike Lawler told The Post, ripping Harris as a “fraud.”

“Everything about her campaign is fake,” Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance said.AP

“Nobody believes that the economy is in a better position than it was under Donald Trump,” he said.

Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance told reporters on Wednesday that Harris’ revamped campaign — with its peddled talking points about “joy” and “fun” — was just as fake as the dances she has showed off at campaign events.

“Everything about her campaign is fake,” Vance said.

On Friday, she is expected to “take on corporate price-gouging” and discuss her own plans to lower the costs of food, housing and health care for the middle class during a planned campaign rally in Raleigh.

On Friday, she is expected to “take on corporate price-gouging” and discuss her own plans to lower the costs of food, housing and health care for the middle class during a planned campaign rally in Raleigh.via REUTERS

Harris is also reportedly crafting a new image around her relatively humble California roots — the daughter of a working single mom — to curry favor with voters, saying the Harris agenda is about an effort to “win the future.”

A slight plurality of voters trust Harris on economic issues over Trump, a Financial Times survey found earlier this week, while a larger plurality believe they will be in better financial shape under the former president.

Still, some of the Biden economic agenda is expected to stick to Harris.

White House press secretary Karine-Jean Pierre confirmed during the daily press briefing that the economic record was “both” of Biden’s and Harris’.Getty Images

White House press secretary Karine-Jean Pierre confirmed during the daily press briefing that the record was “both” of theirs.

“I’m not going to get into polling,” she said. “What I will tell you is Bidenomics has been something that both the president and the vice president has worked on.”

The Democratic operative who spoke with The Post said that some of the economic messaging points may be “easier to defend,” but that “Biden’s immigration record will stick to her.”

“It’s easier to defend Biden’s record on the economy,” the operative explained. “You can point to jobs, you can point to the stock market, lowering the costs of drugs. … Immigration is much more difficult.”

The Democratic operative who spoke with The Post said that some of the economic messaging points may be “easier to defend,” but that “Biden’s immigration record will stick to her.”REUTERS

Another stumbling block could be her past promises to eliminate gas-powered vehicles by 2035, but she has signaled to some energy trade groups in Pennsylvania that she wouldn’t kill the domestic gas and oil industry, according to Reuters.

Chet Thompson, the president of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, told the outlet he would still maintain caution.

“Until the vice president says otherwise, we have to believe she still stands for everything that was in her 2019 policy plan and for every policy she cosponsored as a senator,” he said.

Harris and Biden are slated to appear in Prince George’s county, Md., for an event also touting their administration’s efforts to lower costs — their first joint appearance since he dropped out.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/14/us-news/kamala-harris-latest-flip-flip-is-to-distance-herself-from-biden/

"Would It Kill You Guys?" CNN Gets Confrontational With Harris SPOX For Avoiding Public

 The Harris campaign's 'hide Kamala' strategy may be working from a polling perspective - but it's gone on so long that even CNN is getting annoyed.

"Would it kill you guys to have a press conference?" asked the network's Jim Acosta (of 'shouting at Trump' fame) during an interview with Harris communications director Michael Tyler.

"I’m sure this is not going to be the first time you’ve heard this question, but the Trump campaign is also going after the vice president for not doing enough interviews, for not holding a press conference. Would it kill you guys to have a press conference? Why hasn't she had a press conference?"

To which Tyler laughed sheepishly and pivoted to robotic talking points about Harris and running mate Tim Walz being "busy" traveling around the country to multiple (teleprompter) campaign rallies.

"Michael, you know a campaign really isn't really a press conference," Acosta pushed back. "Why hasn't she had a press conference? She's the vice president, she can handle the questions, why not do it?"

Tyler said Harris will sit down for a one-on-one interview before the end of the month, which Acosta said was "not a lot," adding "can you commit to a press conference by the end of the month?"

Tyler once again deflected - saying "We will commit to directly engage with the voters who are actually going to decide this election, and that is going to be complete with rallies, with sit-down interviews, with press conferences, with all the digital assets that we have at our disposal."

Watch:

CNN's John Berman also pressed a Harris campaign spox over the VP's lack of media presence.

"The reason I was asking you about today is because it seems like she has time if she wanted to do an interview with a member of the media or do a news conference, correct? There does appear to be that time, if she wanted," said Berman - to which Harris campaign spokeswoman Adrienne Elrod repeated Tyler's talking point that Harris and Walz are bringing their message directly to voters.

"She hit a number of battleground states. I think we had 15,000 people in Detroit last week, 12 to 13,000 in Nevada. She’s been taking her message to the voters and drawing large crowds. So she’s actually having those direct conversations," said Elrod - before Berman cut her off.

"But not today — all I’m saying is not today. She could do an interview today, I would think, you know, because she’s not out there today," said the CNN host.

Meanwhile, Trump did a lengthy press conference at Mar-a-Lago last week and had a 2 hour conversation with Elon Musk - something Harris clearly couldn't pull off because her biggest liability, like Biden, is her brain.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/would-it-kill-you-guys-cnn-gets-confrontational-harris-spox-avoiding-interviews-press

California: Next Stop, Venezuela

 Just when you think California didn't have enough foot left to shoot, it pulls out a gun and does it again. This time it involves the initial step toward California nationalizing the gasoline refinery industry. The California Energy Commission (CEC) has proposed several government regulations of the petroleum industry in order to combat future gasoline price surges. CEC regulators announced proposed government controls of the petroleum industry, ostensibly to combat future gasoline price surges. CEC's proposed fiasco is unbelievable since it has a clear vision of the ultimate outcome: Venezuela.

The CEC announcement comes as Chevron, one of the largest oil companies in the U.S., announced that it will relocate its operations to Houston, Texas, is moving out of San Ramon, California. Its decision to leave follows years of aggressive environmental policy making from Democrats that hurt the company's business.

The CEC report is laughably called "Transportation Fuels Assessment: Policy Options for a Reliable Supply of Affordable and Safe Transportation Fuels in California". It's laughable because the report title includes the word 'Affordable.'

The report begins with this 'justification': "The deployment of ZEVs [zero-emission vehicles] and a robust mass transit system are critical for achieving the state's climate goals, reducing local air pollution, and eventually eliminating dependence on the volatile global petroleum markets. As demand for gasoline shrinks, refineries may close or convert to processing clean transportation fuels."

Here's the clincher: "This will lead to fewer gasoline refineries, with increased market concentration and associated market problems that often accompany it... Like most product prices, gasoline prices should ideally obey the laws of supply and demand. However, supply dynamics in California's transportation fuels market differ from many other markets in the United States."

CEC expects some of California's nine oil refineries to be shut down due to decreased demand, thus giving the remaining open refineries increased pricing power that would increase the possibility of a sharp escalation in gas prices. CEC therefore maintains prices must be managed by the government.

CEC proposals include:

The State of California would purchase and own refineries in the state to manage the supply and price of gasoline with the scope of the initiative ranging from 'one refinery to all refineries in the state.'

During times of lower gas prices, fees would be levied in a variable manner to then allow for stabilization initiatives during California-specific price spikes.

California would actively regulate the operating rules, prices, and rate of return of petroleum fuel market operators similar to the current structure used to manage private electric and fossil natural gas utilities as natural monopolies where California sellers would be required to have prices approved by the designated State authority and spending would have to be approved for cost recovery in prices.

California would measure, publicize, and potentially manage retail margins, assure that all gasoline that is sold at retail stations in California is not sold at excessive retail margins.

To further exacerbate the situation, California governor Gavin Newsom claims that California's highest-in-the-nation gasoline taxes and its air quality challenges that requires unique gasoline compositions that differ from the rest of the nation didn't cause current gasoline price increases. They were caused because of price gouging by the oil industry. In response, Newsom signed a bill to address alleged price gouging.

An aside: Price gouging isn't possible in a free country. If a person thinks a price is too high, is being gouged, he is always free to search for another source for a lower, more agreeable price for the product or service he seeks. There is, however, a caveat. Seeking a lower price may cause inconveniences and may make the total expenditure greater than simply paying the higher price (I learned this the hard way when I drove around seeking a lower gasoline price after a hurricane).

CEC's report continues, "Even under the most aggressive scenario transition to ZEVs, millions of petroleum-fueled vehicles are anticipated to remain on California's roads and highways beyond 2035. These vehicles will need fuel to operate, and many of the vehicles may be owned by lower income individuals and families, making it even more compelling to identify ways to ensure an affordable, reliable, equitable, and safe supply." The second sentence is humorous given the situation in Venezuela where 94.5% of the population live below the poverty line.

Venezuelans, in 2020, paid $2 per liter ($7.57 per gallon) for gasoline. This was one of the world's highest prices and a sharp reversal for an OPEC nation that long said it had the world's cheapest gasoline because it had the greatest proven oil reserves in the world. Why the reversal? First, Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in the mid-1970s. Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) was created to manage operations. Second, the oil industry's deterioration increased when Hugo Chávez fired PDVSA's most experienced engineers in an act of petty political retribution.

Venezuela, with the world's largest proven oil reserves, ran out of gasoline. The socialist governments of Chavez and Maduro lost the ability to pump oil from the ground and refine it into gasoline. What little gasoline that's available comes from Iran. But the Venezuelan government, which doesn't officially charge at most gasoline stations, uses a quota system, so a fill-up can mean waiting in line for days.

The quota system is Sistema Patria (Homeland System), a platform created four years ago by Maduro's government to distribute pension payments. It expanded to include gasoline prices. The system provides Chavismo (a left-wing political ideology based on the ideas, programs, and government associated with President Hugo Chávez between 1999 and 2013) with leverage for social and political control and to distribute resources in a country that has shed 70% of its gross domestic product since 2013.

Here's the frightening part: It has the ability to monitor elections. Is this what awaits California?

José Toro Hardy, an economist and former director at PDVSA, said, "PDVSA once had over 20 refineries around the world. We were able to move our oil from the nation's subsoil into the tanks of American drivers. And the entire process was managed by Venezuelan entities with Venezuelan oil wells, pipelines, Venezuelan tankers... We had built something gigantic, but suddenly, we were faced with a costly historic accident: Hugo Chávez won the election."

The collapse in the oil industry is a stark reminder that the most valuable commodity isn't the natural resource, but the human expertise to put it to productive use.

Is the CEC going to turn California into Venezuela? Is Governor Newsom, known to be hostile to the oil industry and committed to ZEVs, climate goals, and a clean environment, going to implement CEC's proposals as an act of petty political retribution?

This is a good reason to get as many people as possible to vote for Donald Trump. If Kamala Harris somehow gets elected, she and the Democrats will print as much money as it takes to put deep-blue California back on its gasoline feet.

Warren Beatty has created a web page that facilitates quick responses and/or comments to anything you consider outrageous: quick-rant.atwebpages.com

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/08/california_next_stop_venezuela.html