Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Entitlement Fraud Is Now a Stated Aim of the Democrat Party

 In yesterday’s column discussing the escalating Alinskyite war by the American Left against Elon Musk, I referenced an interview the industrialist, tech tycoon, and scourer of America’s broken federal fisc gave with Larry Kudlow at Fox Business on Monday. That interview is worth watching in full if you haven’t seen it…

It’s important to recognize that Musk’s discussion of DOGE’s efforts at stripping out all of the obvious waste are closely related to this rather untoward moment from a week ago…

Green’s complaint, the one that motivated him to brandish his walking stick at the president of the United States, was, as he later said, that Donald Trump has “no mandate to cut Medicaid.” 

But Trump isn’t trying to cut Medicaid — at least not in terms of cutting the volume or quality of the service it provides to its honest recipients. Nor is Trump trying to cut Social Security. The White House did what it could in a press release Tuesday to make that clear…

The Trump Administration will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. President Trump himself has said it (over and over and over again).

Elon Musk didn’t say that, either. Fake Sherman is lying again.

Here is Musk’s direct quote“The waste and fraud in entitlement spending — which is most of the federal spending is entitlements — so, that’s, like, the big one to eliminate. That’s the, sort of half-trillion, maybe $6-700 billion a year.

And he’s exactly right.

  • FACT: The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimates taxpayers lose as much as $521 billion annually to fraud — and most of that is within entitlement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.
  • FACT: Over the past two decades, the federal government has made an estimated $2.7 trillion in “improper payments” — the majority of which come in the form of “payments to deceased individuals or those who no longer [are] eligible for government programs.”
  • FACT: The Social Security Administration made an estimated $72 billion in improper payments between 2015 and 2022.
  • FACT: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services estimated it made $140+ billion in improper payments in 2024 alone.

What kind of a person doesn’t support eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending that ultimately costs taxpayers more?

But don’t tell that to Elissa Slotkin, who “won” a close election over Mike Rogers in November for a Senate seat in Michigan and now is somehow a key Democrat spokeswoman…

And don’t tell it to Pete Buttigieg, who’ll apparently be running for Michigan’s other Senate seat (you might have thought he was the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, before Joe Biden made him his make-believe transportation secretary, but geography is fungible for Democrats)…

It’s quite interesting, don’t you think? All of a sudden, the Democrats have this narrative that Musk’s efforts to identify and stop the waste not just in the administrative state but in the entitlement programs where most of the federal budget is spent constitutes “cuts.”

On the surface, you’d see this and scratch your head. After all, the more waste, fraud, and abuse can be drained out of these programs, the easier it is to make them solvent, no? And given Social Security’s promise, which is that you pay into that program your whole working life and it guarantees you a retirement income so it’s more or less a forced savings regime for the American worker, you’d have to say that limiting payouts to cover only those people who legitimately belong in the system is a necessity.

Right?

Well, perhaps not.

Every time Medicaid is audited at the state or federal level, it’s the same story — billions and billions of dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse. Everybody knows Medicaid is a pinata for scam artists and crooks. It’s not for nothing that Al Green, from the slums of south Houston, was the guy carrying on about “Medicaid cuts” — constituencies like his are generally rife with Medicaid fraudsters who set up shop as medical providers and file scads of Medicaid reimbursement forms in search of mailbox money from Uncle Sam. In certain communities where Democrats get near-unanimous voting majorities, Medicaid fraud qualifies as one of the most lucrative industries around.

Medicare isn’t much better.

And as Musk notes, there are millions and millions of Social Security numbers that remain active despite the people those numbers were attached to having assumed room temperature years, decades, or even centuries ago, and those active SSN’s are the petri dish from which illegal aliens might feed in order to claim things like Social Security disability payments.

So while this might seem puzzling — trimming the fat from these programs is a means of shoring them up so that they won’t collapse, and how on earth could that possibly be politically divisive? On the surface, very little is what it seems among today’s Democrats.

And it’s hilarious to see Slotkin accusing Musk of saying the quiet part out loud. Maybe if politics doesn’t work out, she can get a job at the Cineplex because her skills at projection are top-flight.

It’s the Democrats who are saying the quiet part out loud. They’re all but admitting they draw no distinction between honest recipients of entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security and the scammers and fraudsters and illegal aliens who are raking hundreds of billions of dollars out of the system. 

The cost of which, by the way, turns out to be many times those hundreds of billions. The waste, fraud, and abuse, which Musk estimates is somewhere on the order of 15 percent of all the money the government spends, is all deficit spending, and that means we’re borrowing money to throw it out of helicopters to satisfy the clients of the Buttigiegs, Slotkins and Greens of the world. With the interest on the national debt now coming to a trillion dollars a year, you can see the accumulated cost of all this. 

It’s ruinous.

And none of these people can even be bothered to show any concern for it.

Ironically, there’s a certain honesty — or clarity, if you prefer — in all of this. Today’s Democrat Party is a collection of people who believe that a parasitical existence at the government teat is an honorable and productive way of life. That’s something they’ve long sought to downplay. But clearly, that isn’t true anymore; now it’s out in the open. To them, no matter how you manage to get at government benefits, it’s fine.

This ought to make seniors on Social Security or Medicare utterly furious. But to people in their 40s or 50s or below, who have long figured we’d get screwed over by Social Security’s insolvency just in time to not see the checks we’ve been paying for, it’s even worse than that.

And this is a big reason why I say that the Democrats are a dead political party walking. You can’t be this contemptuous of the people you seek to govern and expect to be rewarded by us without a long, contemplative period in the wilderness.

https://spectator.org/entitlement-fraud-now-stated-aim-democrat-party/

Waste of the Day: U.S. Funding Continues Dog Experiments in China

 Topline: A Chinese lab is continuing to receive funds from the U.S. to conduct cruel studies on beagles, according to contracts obtained by the nonprofit White Coat Waste Project and shared with the New York Post.

Key facts: The $124,200 contract was awarded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences using money from the Pentagon, for the experiments on beagle puppies — as well as mice and rats — at the Beijing-based company’s lab from September 2023 until May 2025.

The Chinese company Pharmaron uses the funds to test pharmaceuticals for neurological disorders on 300 beagles per week, as well as mice and rats, White Coat Waste found. Some of the dogs are as young as eight months. Those that suffer organ dysfunction are euthanized, the contract states.

Open the Books
Dogs

Pharmaron’s proposal to the NIH promises to comply with the Animal Welfare Act and notes that “Beagle dog is docile, cute and easy to domesticate.”

It describes how the hundreds of dogs, some as young as eight months, “will be reused” throughout the study “to save animals and decrease cost,” while saying those suffering organ dysfunction will be “euthanized.”

The DOD’s Office of Inspector General conducted an audit in June, citing Pharmaron, as well as the Chinese biotech firms WuXi AppTec and Genscript Inc., as so-called “companies of concern” and blacklisted from doing business with U.S. firms. A bill to this effect passed the U.S. House of Representatives but was not voted on in the Senate.

Background: The research contract is just one example of how the U.S. and China fund each other’s medical research, often resulting in payouts for government scientists and potential national security concerns at taxpayers’ expense.

In 2023, 139 foreign companies licensed medical technology invented by NIH scientists, compared to only 102 domestic companies. The businesses included Pokrov Biologics Plant, which researched the weaponization of smallpox for the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and WuXi AppTec, a Chinese firm with alleged military ties and alleged access to American genetic information.

Search all federal, state and local government salaries and vendor spending with the AI search bot, Benjamin, at OpenTheBooks.com

Critical quote: Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) claims the federal government spends $20 billion each year on animal testing.

“Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency has elevated the problem of wasteful spending from think-tank white papers to a national cover story,” Malliotakis wrote in an op-ed in the Post. “With $36 trillion in national debt — more than $300,000 per taxpayer — there’s a lot of spending to slash. What better way to start than by cutting the $20 billion the government wastes every year on dead-end experiments that torture dogs, cats and other animals?”

Summary: Contract oversight is difficult enough when funds stay within America. Foreign contracts open up even more issues and should only be awarded after strict scrutiny.

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/03/12/waste_of_the_day_us_funding_continues_dog_experiments_in_china_1097025.html

Carson Block Says Hard to Bet Against Musk, Looking Elsewhere

 Muddy Waters Capital founder and CEO Carson Block says he is still not betting against Elon Musk and Tesla on "Bloomberg Open Interest."

Bloomberg videos, provided by MT Newswires

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TESLA-INC-6344549/news/Carson-Block-Says-Hard-to-Bet-Against-Musk-Looking-Elsewhere-49314793/

J&J MedTech MONARCH QUEST for Enhanced Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy OKd

 

Next-generation NVIDIA-powered AI navigation software elevates MONARCHTM Platform for Robotically Assisted Bronchoscopy

Johnson & Johnson MedTech, a global leader in surgical technologies and solutions, today announced U.S. 510(k) regulatory clearance for MONARCH QUEST, the latest advancement in MONARCH navigation technology, featuring AI-powered algorithms and a verified OEC Open interface with the GE HealthCare OEC 3D mobile CBCT Imaging System.

Robotically assisted bronchoscopy represents a small but fast-growing segment of lung biopsy procedures in the U.S. The MONARCH Platform, the first robotically assisted bronchoscopy system to market, provides minimally invasive access to and visualization of airways to help clinicians biopsy suspicious lung nodules.

Nearly half of early-stage lesions are located in the periphery of the lung, which is difficult to reach with traditional bronchoscopy[1]. The MONARCH Platform can aid clinicians in getting to an early, definitive diagnosis in lung cancer cases, which can help care teams get patients into the treatment pathway an average of three weeks faster

https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/johnson-johnson-medtech-announces-clearance-of-monarchtm-quest-for-enhanced-robotic-assisted-bronchoscopy

Moscow 'Studying' 30-day Truce Plan, Makes Steady Battlefield Gains In Meantime

 The Kremlin says it is "studying" statements issued by the US and Ukrainian delegations following yesterday's talks in Jeddah, and further describes Russian officials are waiting for a fuller briefing from the US on the proposal. The 30-day ceasefire plan calls for a halt to all the fighting on land, sea and in the air - which can be extended by mutual agreement, with a hoped-for path to a permanent truce based on negotiations in the interim.

President Zelensky in a Tuesday X post said the ceasefire will apply to missile, drone and bomb attacks "not only in the Black Sea, but also along the entire front line" - though its as yet unclear what mechanism there will be to monitor this.

Via AFP

The joint statement issued from Jeddah said the sides "will communicate to Russia that Russian reciprocity is the key to achieving peace." Thus nothing will happen unless Moscow agrees.

Washington has agreed to lift the Trump ban on arms and intelligence for Kiev, while at the same Kiev and Washington agreed on inking a deal on Ukraine’s critical minerals "as soon as possible".

Russian state media is meanwhile reporting that President Putin is open to holding a telephone conversation with his US counterpart.

On the potential for a new Trump call to discuss progress toward setting up negotiations and a truce, spokesman Dimitry Peskov said Wednesday, "We also do not rule out that the topic of a call at the highest level may arise. If such a need emerges, it will be organized very quickly. The existing channels of dialogue with the Americans make it possible to do this in a relatively short time."

If it happens this would mark the second call since Trump's inauguration, after the prior February 12 call. Theoretically this could lead to an in-person meeting between the two leaders if all goes well. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is traveling back from the meeting in Saudi Arabia, and gave some remarks to a press conference in Ireland:

  • Deterrence against future attacks on Ukraine will be a crucial element of future negotiations.
  • The US-Ukraine minerals deal benefits both nations and deepens Washington’s interest in Ukraine, but “I would not couch it as a security guarantee”.
  • European sanctions against Russia will be part of the negotiations, making Europe’s involvement in the process essential.
  • Any truce could be effectively monitored, but “one of the things we’ll have to determine is who both sides trust on the ground” to oversee it.

Ukraine continues to hold little to no leverage, given Russia is fast taking back its territory in Kursk as of mid-week. Over a dozen settlements have been liberated, and by all accounts Ukraine forces are in retreat there, also as Russian troops are currently in the center of Sudzha town.

One regional sources says that the Russian advance has been swift especially after one particularly daring operation: "Reports over the weekend claimed that 800 Russian special forces had crawled for 15 kilometers through an unused section of pipelinewhich once carried Russian gas to Europe via Ukraine, in order to carry out a sneak attack on Ukrainian forces in Sudzha," writes Moscow Times.

These developments mean that Putin is even less likely to agree to any temporary pause in fighting. In January statements he had warned the Kremlin will not sign off on any temporary truces - given Ukraine could just use it to rearm, resupply, and regroup. Moscow has less incentive to sign onto a deal unless territorial concessions are part of it, given that at this rate it can just keep advancing in territory, particularly in the Donbass.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/moscow-studying-30-day-truce-plan-while-making-steady-battlefield-gains-meantime

Reuters Fake Fact-Check Fails Again

 by Paul D. Thacker via The DisInformation Chronicle,

I had the pleasure of being contacted by Reuters Fact Check last week, with a demand that I explain and justify a headline on a story I wrote about COVID vaccines. I immediately started laughing.

Why?

Well, I should probably explain Reuters Fact Check first.

Reuters Fact Check is one of the many disreputable fact-check organizations that Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg cut ties with in January because, in his words, “The fact checkers have been too politically biased and destroyed more trust than they created, especially in the US.” At the time, Zuckerberg cut financial links with Reuters Fact Check and about two-thirds of the entire fact checking industry.

Zuckerberg began to change his tune about fact checking last May after House Republicans released Meta’s internal communications. Zuckerberg and other Meta executive were exposed complaining in texts and emails that the Biden White House pressured them to censor COVID topics, and they discussed fact checkers falsely labeling some posts as false.

Reuters launched their fact checking initiative in partnership with Meta back in 2020, claiming in a press release, “Reuters has a superior track record in sourcing, verifying and clearing user-generated content for distribution to thousands of clients globally and we are best placed in using our in-house expertise to fact check social media content.”

Well, not really. Like all the fact check organizations, Reuters fact checks narratives, not facts. But before getting into any details, let’s wind the clock back to 2022 when Dr. Kerryn Phelps testified before the Australian Parliament about her COVID vaccine injury.

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation,” Phelps testified, “with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration.”

Laying out the details of how the COVID vaccine harmed her and her wife, Phelps explained that medical professionals dismissed vaccine injury, a point driven home by the venue for her testimony: an Australian government inquiry, not on vaccine injury, but on Long COVID. Phelps’ credentials made it hard for fact checkers and pharma friendly reporters to shoot her down. She is a conjoint professor at the NICM Health Research Institute, the first woman elected president of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), and a former member of the Australian Parliament.

What became clear at the time, however, is that people injured by the COVID vaccine would only be taken seriously if they discussed their symptoms as a type of Long COVIDA group of Australian patients injured by the COVID vaccine called COVERSE submitted testimony to Australian Parliament that adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines could be mistaken for Long COVID, given significant overlap in symptoms.

This second point was further underlined in Brianne Dressen’s book Worth a Shot?: Secrets of the Clinical Trial Participant Who Inspired a Global MovementDressen recounts participating in a U.S. COVID vaccine clinical trial only to be vaccine injured. Some of her story was documented in a Science Magazine article on the NIH’s investigation of COVID vaccine injuries.

Dressen later founded the advocacy group, React 19, for patients harmed by COVID vaccine, and describes in her book how many vaccine injured patients are misdiagnosed with Long COVID.

Dressen is also one of the 28 authors on the preprint I covered that discussed patients who had been harmed by the COVID vaccine: “Yale Researchers Find COVID Spike Protein in Blood 709 Days After Vaccination, Positing Millions of Long COVID Patients May Actually Be Vaccine Injured.”

My headline triggered an anonymous writer for Reuters Fact Check to contact me demanding an explanation:

The senior authors of the paper and independent experts we consulted all refuted that claim, saying there is no such evidence or conclusion in the study.

We wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment on whether you stand by your article and, if possible, to point us to any evidence in the paper that supports your assertion.

I started laughing at first, as Reuters Fact Check has a tattered history with numerous fact checks undermined by scientific research as well as the very Yale study they were citing and that I had reported on. Here’s how I responded to Reuters in email:

MY EMAIL TO REUTERS:

Reuters Fact Check falsely asserted, “The mRNA instructs cells to make the [spike] protein and is broken down by the body shortly thereafter” although the new study found “spike in circulation up to 709 days after vaccination.” When does Reuters Fact Check plan to correct this falsehood in accordance with what is reported in this new study?

Reuters Fact Check asserted, “There is no proof that spike proteins created in response to mRNA vaccines are harmful to the body.” However, the new study reported:

Interaction with full-length S, its subunits (S1, S2), and/or peptide fragments with host molecules may result in prolonged symptoms in certain individuals. Recently, a subset of non-classical monocytes has been shown to harbor S protein in patients with PVS. Further, biodistribution studies on mRNA–LNP platforms in animal models indicate its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, and the local S expression could result in neurocognitive symptoms.

When does Reuters Fact Check plan to correct this falsehood in accordance with what is reported in this new study?

I spoke for several hours on background with one of the paper's 28 authors, so who is Reuters Fact Check speaking with?

Did you notice that each time I caught Reuters with a fake fact check, their mistakes always favored the pharmaceutical industry? Well, Reuters Fact Check never responded to me. Instead, Reuters posted a fake fact check that never bothered to quote anything I sent them. Nor did Reuters go back and correct their fake fact checks from the past. And their fake headline attacked something that was never claimed.

Nobody I’m aware of, nor anyone I have spoken with thinks “Long COVID is a vaccine injury” as Reuters falsely contends. But with tens of millions of Americans reported to have Long COVID, some subset of these patients are likely vaccine injured.

Reuters Fact Check simply made up a claim, debunked it, and proclaimed victory. This is exactly how another former Meta fact checker, Leadstories.com, behaved when they did a fake fact check of a BMJ investigation that exposed problems with Pfizer’s COVID clinical trial.

I spoke to Dr. Danice Hertz, another of the study authors, to get her views on fake fact checks and why so many medical professionals have politicized the issue of vaccines. “Up until this moment, vaccine injury was not acknowledged,” Hertz told me. “And there’s been a concerted effort to cover it up.”

A couple weeks after Zuckerberg cut ties in January with biased fact checkers like Reuters, he sat for an interview with Joe Rogan and complained that Meta was pressured to censor anything on vaccine side effects.

Who’s pressuring you take down things that talk about vaccine side effects,” Rogan asked.

It was people in the Biden administration,” Zuckerberg said.

Venezuela guild calls for US-Venezuela talks after Chevron license cancellation

 

Fedecamaras, a Venezuelan business guild, has called for the U.S. and Venezuela to restart negotiations following the cancellation of Chevron's operating license. The guild warns of the severe economic impact and the wide-ranging effects on businesses that could result from this decision.

In response to the U.S. revoking Chevron's license in Venezuela, the business guild Fedecamaras has expressed deep concerns over the potential economic fallout. The organization stressed the urgency of renewing diplomatic talks to mitigate adverse effects on the nation's economy.
Fedecamaras outlined in a statement that the cancellation of Chevron's operating license could drastically impact Venezuela's already fragile economy and affect a broad spectrum of industries reliant on the oil sector.
The guild has made a formal appeal to both the U.S. and Venezuelan governments to promptly resume discussions. They believe that cooperative dialogue is essential to prevent further economic decline.