Search This Blog

Saturday, June 14, 2025

What is Pisces? New UK stock market for buying shares in private companies



A new type of stock market will open in the UK later this year, allowing investors to trade shares in privately-owned companies — as opposed to those that are publicly owned and listed, for example on the London Stock Exchange (LSE).


Referred to as Pisces — which stands for a Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System — the first trading could begin on the new stock market in the next few months after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) approved the rules around it.


The FCA hopes the move will support the UK economy by giving more choices to the investment community and attracting new funds for growing businesses.

Although Pisces has already officially launched, trading cannot begin until companies who will act as operators start their platforms, which are subject to licences.

With more companies choosing to stay private for longer, the new trading system was created to give investors access to businesses they otherwise could not fund, and to allow those holding shares in private businesses the chance to cash out.


That can be as a result of shares being given as part of an employment package, for example, or by being an investor in an earlier round of private fundraising — which isn’t always accessible to private investors.
Operation

Pisces is set up in the FCA’s sandbox environment to allow for experimentation on what works, what is required and what best practice will turn out to be.

The plan is for around a five-year developmental phase, during which time testing and adjusting will take place with the framework, ahead of permanent rules being established in 2030.

While Pisces is the framework for the stock exchange itself, individual operators will operate the ability to trade — comparative to now, for example, in how people with an investing Isa on an app or with their bank go through them to buy or sell companies or funds listed on the LSE.
(Getty Images)

Those operators will have flexibility on the type of private companies they list; the FCA expect some may operate by size or industry, or perhaps on timing of share sales.

Shares may be available to buy quarterly or annually in different private companies, for example, or during set windows according to their need.

Caution

While the new private stock market is largely welcomed, investors will need to be aware of the additional risks which may be involved, compared to putting money into listed companies.

Legislation exists to demand retail investors have a certain amount of knowledge before parting with their money, but this includes being “self-certified” according to investing experience.

Additionally, while public stock markets are heavily regulated — one of the reasons companies stay private instead of floating — the idea for this sandbox platform is to stay similar to private market processes and laws.

As a result, for example, the process known as insider trading will not apply in the same way, potentially leading to an imbalance of information between those privately investing and institutional, professional investors.


Emma Reynolds, economic secretary to the Treasury, said: “Pisces is a great example of industry, regulators and the government working together to go further and faster on innovative reforms to strengthen UK capital markets, supporting economic growth and putting more money in people’s pocket as part of our Plan for Change.

“I welcome the FCA's announcement, which follows our legislation and opens Pisces to industry. This also builds on our announcements on a Stamp Taxes on Shares exemption for Pisces transactions, and on employees retaining the tax advantages on eligible shares traded.”


Simon Walls, executive director of markets at the FCA, added: “This bold design rebalances risk, but it is bold risk taking that made the UK the leading financial centre it is today. The new platforms will give investors greater access and confidence to invest in exciting new companies, while early backers and employees can sell up and invest again.

“Pisces is the latest step in the FCA’s wide-ranging reforms to the UK’s markets to boost growth and competitiveness.”
Stepping stone

Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell, noted that in an ideal world, Pisces would operate as a first step toward broader aims for both businesses and stakeholders.

“Pisces could help private companies get used to the idea of slices of their business being owned by different people. It might act as a stepping stone towards a public stock listing, getting them used to regular financial reporting, transparency as a business, and understanding that a company is run for the best interests of shareholders, not the board of directors,” he said.


“It could also encourage their staff to develop a saving and investing habit. One of the biggest stumbling blocks for private company share ownership is that staff are often put off by the general inability to sell those shares at regular intervals. A lot of private companies won’t offer the ability for staff to trade shares, meaning some people are stuck owning the equity until the business either lists on a public market or there is an internal event where they can sell down.

“In theory, Pisces could improve liquidity by allowing private company shares to be traded at more regular, albeit intermittent, intervals.”

While there have been comments from some quarters that Pisces could effectively replace some markets such as the UK’s AIM, Mr Coatsworth does not expect that will be the case - and will also not play an “immediate role” in the government’s plan to develop an investing culture in the country.

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-shares-private-companies-091613590.html

Issues On The G7 Agenda: The Big Topics Albanese And Trump Could Discuss

 by Crystal-Rose Jones via The Epoch Times,

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has a full plate ahead of him if he secures a face-to-face meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump at the upcoming G7 summit.

The forum, which will run from June 15 to 17 in Canada, serves as a high-profile political and economic forum for key nations to discuss global issues.

While a meeting is yet to be confirmed between the leaders, Deputy Nationals Leader Kevin Hogan says Australia’s leader faces an expanding laundry list of negotiations.

“It’s vital PM Albanese uses the G7 to make Australia’s case directly to President Trump,” he said on X.

While global tariffs that impact Australian beef exports are high on the agenda, it’s not the only elephant in the room.

‘Liberation Day’ Tariffs on Aussie Beef

Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs implement a baseline 10 percent tariff on all Australian exports to America, and are likely the most pressing matter.

Australia and the United States have a free trade agreement, so the tariffs are not in response to any levy Australia may have implemented on U.S. goods.

Rather the tariffs are likely targeting biosecurity rules and fees that producers say have stonewalled U.S. beef imports trying to enter the country.

Under its rules, Australia refuses to take raw U.S. meat products without assurance that the cattle is produced entirely within the United States, with the Australian government concerned that Mexican and Canadian born livestock are also used.

The tariffs are a major concern for Australia given it exports about $2.9 billion (US$1.89 billion) of beef to the United States annually—the biggest beef exporter to America.

Yet Prime Minister Albanese has said Australia’s biosecurity laws are not up for negotiation, potentially limiting the scope of any discussion.

Tariffs on Steel, Aluminium

Earlier this month, Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 to 50 percent.

“In my judgment, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminium industries,” the president said.

Australia only exports a small percentage of steel and aluminium to the U.S. so the issue will not be as pressing.

Further, Australia’s largest steel producer, BlueScope, already has a factory in the United States.

Increasing Defence Spending

Australia’s slow increase to its defence spending has also raised eyebrows in the states.

Only two weeks ago did U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth call on Australia to up its military spending to 3.5 percent of GDP in response to an aggressive Beijing.

Defence spending currently sits at 2.03 percent in the 2024-25 financial year with a plan to reach 2.3 percent by the end of the decade.

Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles has acknowledged the request, while Albanese has been reticent to pledge anymore funding given the already strained state of the nation’s finances (much of the budget is devoted to welfare services).

AUKUS Deal Under Review

Will the AUKUS agreement sink or swim?

It all depends who you ask, with some onlookers concerned (or gleeful) at the prospect of it being annulled, while others like Minister Marles remaining confident the Pentagon’s recently announced review into the deal is nothing unusual.

Marles believes Australia will continue its role in AUKUS, and that nuclear subs will be delivered.

If Albanese and Trump meet, it will likely become a talking point.

Australia’s Tough Approach on Israel

The Australian Labor government’s icy approach to Israel could also be a major sore point between the nations.

Israel and the U.S. remain historic allies, while the Albanese government has taken more obvious steps recently to distance Australia from the Middle East’s only democracy.

The U.S. has reprimanded Australia on two occasions—once after Australia denied a visa to a pro-Israel tech blogger, and more recently after two elected Israeli ministers were sanctioned over their beliefs about the disputed Palestinian territories.

In both instances, representatives of the U.S. government urged Australia to reconsider its actions.

‘Unfair’ Treatment of US Big Tech Firms

Australia’s regulations and taxes on Big Tech firms could be a major focus from the U.S. perspective.

Australia, like the European Union, has a swathe of laws aimed at taxing multinational revenue, which the United States feels targets their companies disproportionately.

These include the Diverted Profits Tax, the Undertaxed Profits Tax, and the News Media Bargaining Code.

The latter forces tech firms like Google and Meta to pay media outlets for displaying their content—effectively propping up the revenue streams for several major news companies.

Tech companies have urged Trump to intervene, complaining of a US$140 million annual loss.

Further, the U.S. government’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” could impose a 5 percent levy on U.S.-based income or capital gains for Australian taxpayers or companies, in response to what it deems are “unfair” taxes on its companies.

Hollywood Down Under

Eclectic landscapes, skilled production crews and enticing tax incentives have all made Australia an attractive destination to film big Hollywood productions, and it’s been happening for a while.

From the decades-old Matrix to this year’s Captain America: Brave New World, Hollywood seems to love filming in Australia.

But that love may not be so reciprocal, at least not from the U.S. government.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer believes offshore Hollywood movie production is a drain on the U.S. economy, and a 100 percent tariff on American movies filmed outside the U.S. is in the works.

While Australia isn’t the only nation offering tax breaks to lure Hollywood productions, the issue could become one more talking point between the two leaders.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/7-issues-g7-agenda-big-topics-albanese-and-trump-could-discuss

Israel Proclaims Total Air Superiority Over Iranian Capital Area As War Intensifies

 Overnight has seen the continual trading of tit-for-tat missile salvos between Israel and Iran, with Israeli fighter jets busy over western Iran, where they've claimed to have achieved complete domination of the skies after taking out anti-aircraft missile batteries.

Images of large-scale destruction have emerged from both capitals, with Israeli authorities saying at least four citizens have been killed - though casualty figures could be much higher amid an ongoing emergency response - and Iran says Israeli attacks have killed at least 78, including women and children, and wounded over 320 others.

Destruction in Rishon Lezion following an Iranian ballistic missile attack, which killed at least two and injured dozens more, TOI.

Israel has shared footage of successful aerial attacks on Iran's ballistic missile launchers in some cases, while the IDF has announced that 70 Israeli Air Force fighter jets participated in the overnight operation in Tehran to establish "aerial freedom of action" over the Iranian capital

Some 40 sites were targeted, including air defense systems, IDF Spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin has said. Israeli jets were able to fly over and around the capital for some two-and-half hours.

"The dozens of aircraft are flying freely over Tehran, thanks to the opening blow that removed the threat of Iranian air defense systems," he declared. Characterizing this as the deepest operation the Israeli Air Force (IAF) has ever been involved in over Iran, he announced:

"Tehran is no longer immune; the capital is exposed to Israeli strikes."

Israeli jets have yet to strike all of Iran's nuclear facilities, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has warned that this could continue for several days more. There is serious damage reported at Natanz nuclear site. There have been conflicting reports over whether there is any radiation or chemical contamination at the site.

Some sections of the Isfahan site have been damaged, the IDF has said, while the other key site of Fordo has yet to be targeted.

Important, Israel says that nine nuclear scientists have been killed as a result of Friday aerial operations. Clearly Israel is going for leadership decapitation of military and nuclear programs.

Impact scene from Tel Aviv:

Still, even with Iran's military capabilities now being steadily degraded, the Islamic Republic has to some degree shown it can regroup and hit back. Israeli media has described a state of panic on the streets, and in some cases residential areas have been demolished:

Israelis on Saturday described the fear, chaos and confusion as several Iranian missiles slammed into houses and apartments in central Israel overnight, causing widespread destruction, killing three people and wounding dozens.

Warning sirens sent millions of people rushing for safe rooms and bomb shelters as Iran fired several waves of missiles in response to Israeli strikes on its military leadership and nuclear program. While the IDF said most were intercepted, several missiles — apparently armed with large explosive warheads — slammed into homes in Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan and Rishon Lezion.

“We shut the door, started watching the news through the computer, and suddenly there was a boom so loud that the whole building teetered,” Tali Horesh, resident of a Tel Aviv high-rise that was hit Friday night, told the Ynet news site.

Meanwhile President Trump has been nowhere to be seen, and certainly hasn't faced reporters' questions on where the United States stands in all this.

Is Israel committed to full war for regime change in Iran at this point?

developing...

2025 Bilderberg Meeting Attendees Revealed: Global Elites Convene In Secret Amid Global Chaos

 Bilderberg’s 71st meeting kicked off in Stockholm, Sweden Thursday, where global elites convened behind closed doors amid tensions across Europe and the Middle East, and against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s assault on their favorite thing of all time; globalism. The shadowy group, which was founded in 1954, infamously bans media and enforces a code of silence, fueling concerns of hidden agendas and backroom deals shaping the world’s future.

A Swedish flag flutters in Stockholm on April 4, 2020. JONATHAN NACKSTRAND/AFP via Getty Images

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson will address the EU’s “competitiveness" and his country's support for Ukraine against Russia, his spokesperson told Reuters. Transatlantic relations lead the agenda, with Ukraine, critical raw materials, and AI also slated for discussion, according to documents viewed by Reuters.

Unlike similar events, such as the World Economic Forum’s annual get-together in Davos, Switzerland, no media are invited to cover what goes on during the meeting, and attendees themselves tend to remain tight-lipped about what has been said behind the conference’s closed doors. the Epoch Times notes. 

Among the topics scheduled for discussion are Trans-Atlantic relations, the Russia–Ukraine war, the U.S. economy, artificial intelligence, depopulation and migration, the “Authoritarian Axis,” and the geopolitics of energy and critical minerals.

There is limited other information about the event as the meetings are held under the “Chatham House Rule,“ named after the international affairs think tank in London, which states: ”When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.”

The organizers say that this privacy allows participants to take part as individuals rather than in their official capacities, meaning they are not bound by any office they may hold or previous publicly stated positions on the issues for discussion.

Notable American participants include Stacey Abrams, CEO of Sage Works Production; Anne Applebaum, staff writer at The Atlantic; Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer; Jane Fraser, CEO of Citigroup; Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft; and Peter Thiel, President of Thiel Capital. Other prominent Americans include Jack Clark of Anthropic, Alex Karp of Palantir, Eric Schmidt of Relativity Space, and Lawrence Summers of Harvard, alongside national security figures like Christopher Donahue, Commander of US Army Europe and Africa, and Samuel Paparo, Commander of US Indo-Pacific Command. Political and corporate media voices such as Jason Smith, Member of Congress, and Fareed Zakaria, host of Fareed Zakaria GPS, round out the roster.

Below is the complete list of participants:

  • Abrams, Stacey (USA), CEO, Sage Works Production

  • Albuquerque, Maria Luís (INT), European Commissioner Financial Services and the Savings and Investments Union

  • Alcázar Benjumea, Diego del (ESP), CEO, IE University

  • Alverà, Marco (ITA), Co-Founder, zhero.net; CEO TES

  • Andersson, Magdalena (SWE), Leader, Social Democratic Party

  • Applebaum, Anne (USA), Staff Writer, The Atlantic

  • Attal, Gabriel (FRA), Former Prime Minister

  • Auchincloss, Murray (CAN), CEO, BP plc

  • Baker, James H. (USA), Former Director, Office of Net Assessment, Department of Defense

  • Barbizet, Patricia (FRA), Chair and CEO, Temaris & Associés SAS

  • Barroso, José Manuel (PRT), Chair International Advisors, Goldman Sachs International

  • Baudson, Valérie (FRA), CEO, Amundi SA

  • Beleza, Leonor (PRT), President, Champalimaud Foundation

  • Birol, Fatih (INT), Executive Director, International Energy Agency

  • Botín, Ana (ESP), Group Executive Chair, Banco Santander SA

  • Bourla, Albert (USA), Chair and CEO, Pfizer Inc.

  • Brende, Børge (NOR), President, World Economic Forum

  • Brunner, Magnus (INT), European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration

  • Brzoska, Rafal (POL), CEO, InPost SA

  • Busch, Ebba (SWE), Minister for Energy, Business and Industry

  • Caine, Patrice (FRA), Chair & CEO, Thales Group

  • Calviño, Nadia (INT), President, European Investment Bank

  • Castries, Henri de (FRA), President, Institut Montaigne

  • Chambers, Jack (IRL), Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Reform and Digitalisation

  • Champagne, François-Philippe (CAN), Minister of Finance and National Revenue

  • Clark, Jack (USA), Co-Founder & Head of Policy, Anthropic PBC

  • Crawford, Kate (USA), Professor and Senior Principal Researcher, USC and Microsoft Research

  • Donahue, Christopher (USA), Commander, US Army Europe and Africa

  • Donohoe, Paschal (INT), President, Eurogroup; Minister of Finance

  • Döpfner, Mathias (DEU), Chair and CEO, Axel Springer SE

  • Eberstadt, Nicholas N. (USA), Henry Wendt Scholar in Political Economy, AEI

  • Ek, Daniel (SWE), CEO, Spotify SA

  • Ekholm, Börje (SWE), CEO, Ericsson Group

  • Eriksen, Øyvind (NOR), President and CEO, Aker ASA

  • Feltri, Stefano (ITA), Journalist

  • Fentener van Vlissingen, Annemiek (NLD), Chair, SHV Holdings NV

  • Fraser, Jane (USA), CEO, Citigroup

  • Freeland, Chrystia (CAN), Minister of Transport and Internal Trade

  • Friedman, Thomas L. (USA), Foreign Affairs Columnist, The New York Times

  • Gabuev, Alexander (INT), Director, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Hammer, Kristina (AUT), President, Salzburg Festival

  • Harrington, Kevin (USA), Senior Director for Strategic Planning, NSC

  • Hassabis, Demis (GBR), Co-Founder and CEO, Google DeepMind

  • Hedegaard, Connie (DNK), Chair, KR Foundation

  • Heinrichs, Rebeccah (USA), Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute

  • Heraty, Anne (IRL), Chair, Sherry Fitzgerald ana IBEC

  • Herlin, Jussi (FIN), Vice Chair, KONE Corporation

  • Hernández de Cos, Pablo (ESP), General Manager Elect, Bank for International Settlements

  • Hobson, Mellody (USA), Co-CEO and President, Ariel Investments LLC

  • Hoekstra, Wopke (INT), European Commissioner for Climate, Net Zero and Clean Growth

  • Hunt, Jeremy (GBR), Member of Parliament

  • Isla, Pablo (ESP), Vice-Chair, Nestlé SA

  • Johansson, Micael (SWE), President and CEO, Saab AB

  • Jonsson, Conni (SWE), Founder and Chair, EQT Group

  • Karp, Alex (USA), CEO, Palantir Technologies Inc.

  • Klingbeil, Lars (DEU), Vice-Chancellor; Minister of Finance

  • Klöckner, Julia (DEU), President Bundestag

  • Kostrzewa, Wojciech (POL), President, Polish Business Roundtable

  • Kotkin, Stephen (USA), Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

  • Kratsios, Michael (USA), Director, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

  • Kravis, Henry R. (USA), Co-Founder and Co-Executive Chair, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

  • Kudelski, André (CHE), Chair and CEO, Kudelski Group SA

  • Kuleba, Dmytro (UKR), Adjunct Professor, Sciences Po

  • Leeuwen, Geoffrey van (INT), Director Private Office of the Secretary General, NATO

  • Lemierre, Jean (FRA), Chair, BNP Paribas

  • Letta, Enrico (ITA), Dean, IE School of Politics, Economics & Global Affairs

  • Leysen, Thomas (BEL), Chair, dsm-firmenich AG

  • Lighthizer, Robert (USA), Chair, Center for American Trade

  • Liikanen, Erkki (FIN), Chair, IFRS Foundation Trustees

  • Lundstedt, Martin (SWE), CEO, Volvo Group

  • Marin, Sanna (FIN), Strategic Counsellor, Tony Blair Institute for Global Change

  • McGrath, Michael (INT), European Commissioner for Democracy, Justice and the Rule of Law

  • Mensch, Arthur (FRA), Co-Founder and CEO, Mistral AI

  • Micklethwait, John (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP

  • Minton Beddoes, Zanny (GBR), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist

  • Mitsotakis, Kyriakos (GRC), Prime Minister

  • Monti, Mario (ITA), Senator for life

  • Moore, Richard (GBR), Chief, Secret Intelligence Service

  • Nadella, Satya (USA), CEO, Microsoft Corporation

  • Netherlands, H.M. the King of the (NLD),

  • O'Leary, Michael (IRL), Group CEO, Ryanair Group

  • Ollongren, Kajsa (NLD), Fellow, Chatham House; Senior Fellow, GLOBSEC

  • Özyeğin, Murat (TUR), Chair, Fiba Group

  • Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC), Chair, TITAN S.A.

  • Paparo, Samuel (USA), Commander, US Indo-Pacific Command

  • Philippe, Édouard (FRA), Mayor, Le Havre

  • Pouyanné, Patrick (FRA), Chair and CEO, TotalEnergies SE

  • Prokopenko, Alexandra (INT), Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Rachman, Gideon (GBR), Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, Financial Times

  • Rappard, Rolly van (NLD), Co-Founder and Chair, CVC Capital Partners

  • Reiche, Katherina (DEU), Minister of Economic Affairs and Energy

  • Ringstad Vartdal, Birgitte (NOR), CEO, Statkraft AS

  • Roche, Nicolas (FRA), Secretary General, General Secretariat for Defence and National Security

  • Rutte, Mark (INT), Secretary General, NATO

  • Salvi, Diogo (PRT), Co-Founder and CEO, TIMWE

  • Sawers, John (GBR), Executive Chair, Newbridge Advisory Ltd.

  • Scherf, Gundbert (DEU), Co-Founder and Co-CEO, Helsing GmbH

  • Schimpf, Brian (USA), Co-Founder & CEO, Anduril Industries

  • Schmidt, Eric E. (USA), Executive Chair and CEO, Relativity Space Inc

  • Schmidt, Wolfgang (DEU), Former Federal Minister for Special Tasks, Head of the Chancellery

  • Šefčovič, Maroš (INT), European Commissioner Trade and Economic Security; Interinstitutional Relations and Transparency

  • Sewing, Christian (DEU), CEO, Deutsche Bank AG

  • Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL), Minister of Foreign Affairs

  • Şimşek, Mehmet (TUR), Minister of Finance

  • Smith, Jason (USA), Member of Congress

  • Stoltenberg, Jens (NOR), Minister of Finance

  • Streeting, Wes (GBR), Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

  • Stubb, Alexander (FIN), President of the Republic

  • Suleyman, Mustafa (USA), CEO, Microsoft AI

  • Summers, Lawrence (USA), Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University

  • Thiel, Peter (USA), President, Thiel Capital LLC

  • Toulemon, Laurent (FRA), Senior Researcher, INED

  • Uggla, Robert (DNK), Chair, A.P. Møller-Maersk A/S

  • Valentini, Valentino (ITA), Deputy Minister of Enterprise and Made in Italy

  • Vassy, Luis (FRA), Director, Sciences Po

  • Verhoeven, Karel (BEL), Editor-in-Chief, De Standaard

  • Wallenberg, Jacob (SWE), Chair, Investor AB

  • Wallenberg, Marcus (SWE), Chair, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB

  • Weder di Mauro, Beatrice (CHE), President, Centre for Economic Policy Research

  • Weel, David van (NLD), Minister of Justice and Security

  • Wilmès, Sophie (INT), Vice-President, European Parliament

  • Zakaria, Fareed (USA), Host, Fareed Zakaria GPS

  • Zeiler, Gerhard (AUT), President, Warner Bros. Discovery International

In 2016, Thiel offered a rare comment to reporters outside of the Bilderberg conference, telling We Are Change reporter Luke Rudkowski that, “Engaging with diverse perspectives is crucial, regardless of differences."

"Our society faces numerous challenges, and we must […] find ways to have open discussions, even if not everything is fully transparent,” the added.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/2025-bilderberg-meeting-attendees-revealed-global-elites-convene-secret-amid-global

Boeing resumes China deliveries with 787-9 jet to Juneyao Airlines, Yicai reports

 Boeing delivered a new 787-9 aircraft to China's Juneyao Airlines on Saturday, Chinese media outlet Yicai reported, as trade tensions between Beijing and Washington ease.

The delivery comes two days after a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner with 242 people on board crashed in a fireball shortly after takeoff in western India.for comment on the Yicai report.

The U.S. aerospace giant had suspended new aircraft deliveries to China in April as President Donald Trump's tariff war escalated between the world's two largest economies.

Boeing said at the end of May that deliveries would resume this month after the tariffs were temporarily scaled back for 90 days.

China and the U.S. concluded two days of negotiations in London on Tuesday to resolve key trade issues in the two superpowers' bruising tariff war, where negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates.

On Monday, a new Boeing 737 MAX painted in the livery of Xiamen Airlines landed in China, adding to signs that the planemaker was resuming deliveries to China. The country represents about 10% of Boeing's commercial backlog and is an important and growing aviation market.

Boeing had previously said customers in China would not take delivery of new planes due to the tariffs and that it was looking to resell potentially dozens of aircraft.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-resumes-china-deliveries-787-043527436.html

'US immigration officials told to largely pause raids on farms, hotels, NYT reports'

 U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has told immigration officials to largely pause raids and arrests in the agricultural industry, hotels and restaurants, the New York Times reported on Friday.

The report cited an internal email and three U.S. officials with knowledge of the guidance.

"Effective today, please hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels," Tatum King, a senior official at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said in guidance to regional leaders of the department, the Times added.

The Department of Homeland Security confirmed the guidance to the Times and said: "We will follow the president's direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America's streets,"

Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. The White House and U.S. department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside of regular business hours.

The report comes after Trump said on Thursday he would issue an order soon to address the effects of his immigration crackdown on the country's farm and hotel industries, which rely heavily on migrant labor.

U.S. farm industry groups have long wanted Trump to spare their sector from mass deportations, which could upend a food supply chain dependent on immigrants.

Trump is carrying out his campaign promise to deport immigrants in the country illegally. But protesters and some Trump supporters have questioned the targeting of those who are not convicted criminals, including in places of employment such as those that sparked last week's protests in Los Angeles.

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/US-immigration-officials-told-to-largely-pause-raids-on-farms-hotels-NYT-reports-50241049/

Qualitas Health Weighs $942 Million Malaysian IPO, The Edge Says

 


Asian healthcare provider Qualitas Health Group is weighing an initial public offering that will raise as much as 4 billion ringgit ($942 million), according to a report in The Edge, citing sources with knowledge of the matter.

The company has reached out to investment bankers for the exercise, which will raise funds for expansion, the report said. The group has operations in Singapore, Malaysia and Australia, it added.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-14/qualitas-health-weighs-942-million-malaysian-ipo-the-edge-says