Search This Blog

Friday, August 8, 2025

As antisemitism surges, the Islamist threat must be taken seriously

 You don’t need to read the latest FBI hate-crime statistics to know that there has been a surge in antisemitism in the United States since Oct. 7, 2023. The evidence that a global wave of Jew-hatred was making itself felt was plainly evident on the streets of American cities, and especially on college campuses, where mobs were chanting for the destruction of the one Jewish state on the planet and for terrorism against Jews everywhere. There was also the series of violent murderous attacks on Jewish targets, as well as the mainstreaming of blood libels about Israel and Jews in legacy media outlets.

But a deep dive into the report issued by the FBI this week for crimes reported in the year 2024 confirmed for anyone not already convinced that antisemitism is spiking. Of all the crimes based on religious prejudice that year, some 69.1% were against Jews. Though Jews have been the leading victims of such attacks for as long as the FBI has been issuing statistics, this was an increase over previous years.

Just as significant was the annual reminder that despite the push in the media and from groups purporting to represent the interests of Muslim Americans to treat Islamophobia as a national problem second only to anti-black racial prejudice, the evidence for that assertion is still lacking. In fact, crimes against Muslims were second only to those against Jews. Indeed, despite the rising population of believers in Islam and declining American-Jewish demographics, attacks on Jews again vastly outnumbered those against Muslims, with only 9.3% being listed as anti-Islamic.

Surge in Jew-hatred

That means Jews were about 660% more likely than Muslims to be victims of anti-religious-bias offenses in the United States last year. Throw in the fact that the numbers of anti-Jewish crimes recorded by the Anti-Defamation League are far higher than those in the FBI statistics, and it’s apparent that the problem of antisemitism is approaching the level of an epidemic.

What isn’t to be found in the data is an understanding of the primary engines of antisemitism in 21st-century America.

There are a variety of sources of the world’s oldest hatred, some from the left and some from the far-right. But that which has been directed against Jews since the Hamas-led Palestinian-Arab attacks on southern Israeli communities started the current war with unspeakable atrocities has largely been driven by those who support the perpetrators. That is why any discussion about the massive uptick in anti-Jewish crimes must not only focus on notorious instances of antisemitism, such as the encampments at major universities, where Jews were targeted by woke leftists activists, or even the vitriol spewed by right-wing podcasters like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. We must also speak directly about the widespread antisemitism that is coming out of the Muslim-American community and the groups, both foreign and domestic, which are helping to direct and fund it.

This is why authorities shouldn’t just note the hate-crime statistics with dismay and issue anodyne statements calling for everyone to be nicer to each other. Instead, action must be taken to curb the activities of hate groups, especially those masquerading as civil-rights advocates and those who receive foreign funding from entities and states playing an active role in spreading Jew-hatred.

CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood

At the top of the to-do list should be the stripping of one of the principal engines of American-Muslim antisemitism—the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—of its tax-exempt status, as Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) recently demanded. Just as high on that list must be a congressional vote to do something the United States should have done decades ago: designate the Muslim Brotherhood, which plays a large role in fomenting hate at home and abroad—and to which CAIR is directly connected—as a terrorist organization, as members of the Senate and House have proposed.

The Brotherhood is a century-old group, founded in the Middle East and dedicated to unremitting conflict and hatred of the West, particularly of Jews. Its loosely organized network was a major source of instability in countries like Egypt, but in our day, its most prominent offspring is Hamas. Its leadership lives in Qatar and, backed by the enormous oil wealth of that emirate, spreads its ideology throughout the world.

One example of its activity is, as documented by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism & Policy, is its thorough infiltration of Canada via local Muslim groups. This poses a threat to both the Jewish community and the country’s democratic culture, as it seeks to shut down scrutiny of its antisemitism by using the government in Ottawa to punish acts of alleged Islamophobia.

As was the case in 2019, when President Donald Trump first proposed, but ultimately failed, designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, there will be considerable opposition to such a measure today.

At the heart of that reluctance is the conviction among many in America’s political/foreign-policy establishment, the mainstream media, academia and the world of popular culture that to speak of Muslim antisemitism—and the way those influenced by or part of the Brotherhood’s network are promoting hate—is something that can’t be done. Why? Because those who have tried to point out the problem expose themselves to charges of bigotry and Islamophobia.

A mythical backlash

For much of the last 24 years, since the 9/11 attacks, Americans have been subjected to endless lectures about their obligation not to associate Islam with Islamist terrorism. Those admonitions about the evils of religious prejudice were correct as a matter of principle. But in the context of the misnamed “war on terrorism” launched by President George W. Bush against a global Islamist terror network, those warnings tended to undermine the sense of urgency about the struggle.

Indeed, Bush’s incessant scolding about Islam’s being a “religion of peace” didn’t merely verge on the comic. It also made a mockery of any hope of having a serious national discussion about the distinction between the many peace-loving Muslim citizens and the hundreds of millions of other followers of that faith who supported Islamist sects that were anything but peaceful.

That confusion led to a standing narrative in American culture—bolstered by the manifest opposition of the mainstream liberal media in any conflict with non-Western belief systems—in which the main outcome of 9/11 was a mythical backlash against Muslims. Over the years, that fictional wave of prejudice was never backed up by objective evidence that it was anything more than stray anecdotes woven together in order to subvert efforts to take the threat of Islamist terror seriously.

Eventually, thanks in no small measure to the efforts of Islamist front groups masquerading as civil-rights organizations—such as CAIR—it was expanded into a new form of bias for which Americans were told they must atone: Islamophobia.

But, curiously, as soon became apparent, most of what was labeled “Islamophobia” wasn’t really prejudice against Muslims. Instead, it almost always involved attempts to call attention to the antisemitism in the Muslim world–specifically in relation to groups like CAIR with roots in Muslim Brotherhood-related activities, among them fundraising for Hamas.

Indeed, what they really mean when they cry “Islamophobia” is that holding Muslims accountable for the hate uttered by those who speak for them is something they not only won’t tolerate; they’re determined to ban it.

Biden and DEI

This sentiment was never more in fashion than during the Biden administration, when toxic left-wing ideologies like critical race theory and intersectionality were embraced by the bureaucracy. President Joe Biden’s decision to force the entire federal government to implement the woke catechism of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in all of its doings meant that Islamophobia became a particular priority for Washington.

The notion that Muslims were under particular threat from other Americans wasn’t backed up by hate-crime statistics or anything else. But it fit in with the mantra that all “people of color” or designated minorities were under continual threat and in the right no matter what they did. By the same token, the impulse to see Jews and Israel as “white” oppressors who were always in the wrong made itself felt even when the White House tried to pretend that it cared about antisemitism.

That was made clear when Biden included CAIR, a major source of Jew-hatred itself, in his task force working on a strategy against antisemitism. This was followed up in the last weeks of the administration by the issuance of a strategy paper about Islamophobia that sealed the Democrats’ effort to create a moral equivalence between a real problem—antisemitism—and a fake one.

The second Trump administration has started to roll back this whitewashing of CAIR. But it needs to go further.

By stripping CAIR of its non-profit status and potentially designating it, along with its spiritual godfathers in the Muslim Brotherhood, as affiliated with terrorism, the government can send a strong message that it will no longer tolerate the way a conspiratorial Islamist group’s message of terror and hate has infiltrated the American mainstream.

Doing this won’t have an impact on anyone’s First Amendment rights, since American citizens will always be free to voice their opinions, even when hateful. But the Brotherhood and its network are criminal organizations linked to some of the worst terrorist atrocities of recent history. Saying this out loud doesn’t constitute Islamophobia. It’s a recognition of a potent source of Jew-hatred that has been flying under the radar of government scrutiny by pretending to be defending a minority community against hate.

More to the point, it is way past time for the government to take notice of the fact that these foreign conspirators and their local agents are the engine of a surge in attacks on American Jews that should not be tolerated.

Arrayed against this effort are powerful and wealthy forces, principally a regime in Doha that poses as a U.S. ally while also backing Iran and Hamas. To this end, Qatar has not only become the largest foreign funder of American higher education, but also has used its wealth to buy influence on both the left and the right, including with Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.

The statistics showing the rise in antisemitism should be a wake-up call to an administration that wants to be taken seriously on the issue.  And it will require confronting the Brotherhood’s Qatari paymasters local network affiliates like CAIR. If Washington doesn’t act, the out-of-control surge in Jew-hatred will only get worse.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate).

https://www.jns.org/as-antisemitism-surges-the-islamist-threat-must-be-taken-seriously/

Correcting A Botched Census? I Voted For That!

 

This is one hell of a week for conservatives, isn’t it?

It’s a shame that time and space conspire to limit this entry of the 5QT to five, because this one could be a 20QT.

And it comes with a qualifier: these pickings are more or less first-come, first-serve and don’t reflect a particular priority. In other words, I’m well aware I’m leaving out lots of mighty fine developments since Monday.

Even so, these alone should give you a little buzz if you’re a patriot.

1. Team “Our Democracy” Gave Us a Trash Census. Trump Is Trashing It.

We’ve been waiting on this one, and it finally came down…

Hell, yes.

There are two problems here. One is, as Trump correctly notes, the inclusion of illegal aliens in the census population counts, which, as we’ve seen, is a structural deficiency that the Democrats have been using to their advantage at the expense of American citizens and taxpayers. I’ll let Vice President JD Vance explain…

Yes, but this is unconstitutional, says the Left, with no apparent sense of irony at all. Because the operative word in the Enumeration Clause is “persons” and not “citizens,” and it is therefore prescribed in the Constitution that the census must count illegals.

Let me leave that issue alone for our current purposes. Because there’s another part of this going on, which might well leap over the question of whether the Census can skip counting illegal aliens for apportionment. Let’s go back to last year when the House delved into the Census’s work product…

A key House committee has begun an investigation into Census Bureau overcounts and undercounts that favor Democrats in awarding congressional apportionment and Electoral College votes.

House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., wrote Census Bureau Director Robert Santos on Wednesday to inquire about its communications about the overcounts and undercounts of state populations with the Biden-Harris administration and its Commerce Department, which includes the bureau.

After the 2020 census, the Census Bureau’s 2020 Post-Enumeration Survey, or PES, released the following year identified significant errors in the counts.

Such miscounts did not occur in the 2010 census, Comer noted in his letter to Santos.

“Significantly, these errors likely led to an erroneous apportionment of representatives among the states,” Comer wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Daily Signal. “Even relatively small differences in population count can affect congressional representation, as a single congressional seat cannot be divided among multiple states.”

“Undercounts or overcounts can be the deciding factor between a state gaining or losing an additional representative in its delegation,” the Kentucky Republican wrote.

There were states whose populations were overcounted or undercounted by as much as four or five percent, which reflected some pretty serious deficiencies in quality. Perhaps this was caused by COVID, perhaps not — the fact that the overcounts were almost all in blue states and the undercounts were almost all in red states tells you this was political.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. The 2020 Census was inaccurate. Period. And nothing in the Constitution says that the nation must be saddled with an inaccurate census that has the effect of denying American citizens equal protection rights based on congressional apportionment.

What’s the effect of all of this?

Here’s the fun part: Trump doesn’t have to get a new census to win on this. He wins, and the GOP wins, just by raising the issue. And this happens in three different ways.

First, by raising the issue of a corrupt census which gave Democrats more House seats in blue states than they should have, he puts them further on defense when they’re already trying to defend those Texas fleebaggers trying to delay redistricting in Texas. The Dems have been doing everything they can to rally their base behind these losers, and here comes Trump to raise the stakes by declaring that their entire House caucus is essentially illegitimate because of a corrupt apportionment process, and there simply isn’t any stable ground under their feet on any of this.

Second, the bait he put out there, which Democrats have taken hook, line, and sinker with these fresh constitutional arguments, is to get them defending the position that it’s desirable and proper for illegal aliens to be counted in the census and thus dilute the political power of U.S. citizens. There are a few less popular positions one can defend in America right now, but only a few, and by defending this one, the Democrats are further cemented as the party on the opposite side of the American people on the basic question of election integrity. This is just about as bad as the transgender issue for them, and with constituencies that they actually need.

And third, Trump now has another key justification for mass deportations, and public support of them — at a time when the Left is attempting to use sob stories (we had a post this week at The Hayride about Paola Clouatre, an illegal Mexican who married a Marine and spent a couple of months in an ICE detention center earlier this year because she’d done nothing to get a green card until May) to sap public support for ICE. Now, all of this is connected — you get hit with sob stories by Democrat media because they want to preserve a structural advantage which directly damages you, and thus you’re a lot less likely to be moved by them.

It all plays to Trump’s advantage. So much so that perhaps he’s able to push a constitutional amendment that dumps birthright citizenship and directs the Census to count only citizens for the purpose of apportionment, thus correcting two drafting mistakes of the 14th Amendment. Blue states won’t want to ratify that, but it’s a very, very bad issue for them.

It’s a great move all around.

2. About the Fleebaggers, There Is This…

Did you know the Texas legislature is in a special session to redraw its congressional map on the strong advice of the Department of Justice?

Well, yes, they are.

As the head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Harmeet Dhillon, explained to Sean Spicer, her office sent Texas a letter informing the state that it had some racially gerrymandered districts and that those needed to be done away with in order to bring Texas into compliance with the Constitution.

So now Democrats want states to defy the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ? You guys sure that’s how you want to do it?

Boy, they really won’t like it when the Supreme Court ends racial gerrymandering altogether by invalidating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act when they decide Louisiana v. Callais in a couple of months.

3. Lee Zeldin Is a National Treasure

This was perhaps the greatest video clip ever generated by a public official. It’s EPA director Lee Zeldin being interviewed by CNN’s Kasie Hunt, who attempted to buffalo him into one of those “you’re an EXTREMIST!” corners. She asked him if he denied carbon dioxide was a main driver of “man-made climate change.”

And Zeldin answered the question by first, indicting CNN’s setup of the interview, and second, sticking to the EPA’s cancellation of the 2009 endangerment finding on CO2, which has been such a disaster for the U.S. economy while invalidating her question on an evidentiary basis. He said we now have 2025 data, which invalidates the bad 2009 assumptions.

Which is a way to say that no, carbon dioxide doesn’t cause global warming like this fraudulent “overwhelming consensus” would have you believe. But by saying it indirectly, Zeldin is sticking to facts he can defend, from which the deduction can be made that all this “climate change” stuff is an expensive grift.

Damn, he’s good.

What’s great about this is Zeldin isn’t just arguing that we get off the climate change bus. He’s taking us off it and then explaining why we don’t want to be on it. That’s a level of effective action most people didn’t expect from Republicans until not so long ago.

4. Another Player on the “Our Democracy” Team Turns Up Lame

Well, you can’t get anything out of Robert Mueller on the Russiagate hoax. Subpoenaed by the House Committee seeking to get to the bottom of the mess, we find out he’s even worse off than Joe Biden is.

Robert Mueller is allegedly residing in a memory care facility, according to a report published Monday by Real Clear Politics. The former FBI director and special counsel, who led the high-profile investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, has reportedly been in the facility “for the past few years,” sources told investigative journalist Paul Sperry.

The report surfaced as the House Oversight Committee announced it had issued Mueller a subpoena to testify about the FBI’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Chairman James Comer is seeking answers about a long-dormant federal investigation into Epstein that occurred during the George W. Bush administration.

While the Oversight Committee confirmed the subpoena was issued, it declined to comment on Mueller’s alleged condition. “The subpoenas issued are legally binding and duly authorized,” a spokesperson told the Daily Caller. “As always, the Committee will engage in good faith negotiations with all parties.”

The report from Real Clear Politics has raised concerns about Mueller’s cognitive capacity and ability to testify. If confirmed, it would mark a dramatic turn for the once-revered lawman who served as FBI director under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama and later as special counsel in one of the most politically charged investigations in recent memory.

Mueller’s 2019 report famously concluded that investigators did not find sufficient evidence that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia to influence the 2016 election — a finding that sharply contradicted years of media speculation and Democrat accusations.

It remains unclear how the Oversight Committee will proceed if Mueller is unable to participate in the deposition. No official statement has been released by Mueller or his representatives regarding the report or the subpoena.

Well, there you go.

You’re going to find out that none of the players in any of these scandals are going to be able to exonerate themselves. Here’s another example — Anita Dunn, who somehow was a key adviser to Team Biden on political messaging (no, she isn’t very good at her job, but you won’t find anybody more utterly evil than Anita Dunn), got called up to testify and, well…

The House Oversight Committee put out a statement afterward, shredding Dunn:

It’s no surprise Anita Dunn is telling the American people not to believe their own eyes, claiming Joe Biden was sharp and “fully engaged.” This opening statement, leaked to media before Ms. Dunn even delivered it, is yet another example of the absurd lengths Biden loyalists will go to defend his failed presidency.

What’s fun is the subpoena sure to come for all of her emails to people in the Biden White House to see if she was holding that story in private among friends, because almost nobody believes Anita Dunn is telling the truth here.

And when those emails don’t match up with that statement, then… gosh, that’s lying to Congress, isn’t it? Why, you get a criminal referral to DOJ for something like that, and you might just spend a little time in jail for such shenanigans.

https://spectator.org/five-quick-things-correcting-a-botched-census-i-voted-for-that/


White House to Clarify Gold Tariffs After Ruling Sparked Chaos

 


The Trump administration suggested it would issue a new policy clarifying that imports of gold bars shouldn’t face tariffs, after a US government agency stunned traders by formally ruling that they’d be subject to duties.

The administration intends to post an executive order in the near future to clarify what it called misinformation about the tariffing of gold and other specialty products, a White House official told Bloomberg in a written statement. The official detailed the plans Friday on condition of anonymity.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-08/white-house-to-clarify-misinformation-on-gold-tariffs

Gilead Sciences' HIV Drug Yeztugo Unlikely to Deliver Significant Contributions Until 2028

 Oppenheimer says

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/gilead-sciences-hiv-drug-yeztugo-unlikely-to-deliver-significant-contributions-until-2028-oppenhei-ce7c5edddc8ff322

India pauses plans to buy U.S. arms after Trump's tariffs

 New Delhi has put on hold its plans to procure new U.S. weapons and aircraft, according to three Indian officials familiar with the matter, in India's first concrete sign of discontent after tariffs imposed on its exports by President Donald Trump dragged ties to their lowest level in decades.

India had been planning to send Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Washington in the coming weeks for an announcement on some of the purchases, but that trip has been cancelled, two of the people said.

Trump on Aug. 6 imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods as punishment for Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, which he said meant the country was funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That raised the total duty on Indian exports to 50% - among the highest of any U.S. trading partner.

The president has a history of rapidly reversing himself on tariffs and India has said it remains actively engaged in discussions with Washington. One of the people said the defence purchases could go ahead once India had clarity on tariffs and the direction of bilateral ties, but "just not as soon as they were expected to."

Written instructions had not been given to pause the purchases, another official said, indicating that Delhi had the option to quickly reverse course, though there was "no forward movement at least for now."

Post publication of this story, India’s government issued a statement it attributed to a Ministry of Defence source describing news reports of a pause in the talks as "false and fabricated." The statement also said procurement was progressing as per "extant procedures."

Delhi, which has forged a close partnership with America in recent years, has said it is being unfairly targeted and that Washington and its European allies continue to trade with Moscow when it is in their interest.

Reuters is reporting for the first time that discussions on India's purchases of Stryker combat vehicles made by General Dynamics Land Systems and Javelin anti-tank missiles developed by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin have been paused due to the tariffs.

Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in February announced plans to pursue procurement and joint production of those items.

Singh had also been planning to announce the purchase of six Boeing P8I reconnaissance aircraft and support systems for the Indian Navy during his now-cancelled trip, two of the people said. Talks over procuring the aircraft in a proposed $3.6 billion deal were at an advanced stage, according to the officials.

Boeing, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics referred queries to the Indian and U.S. governments. Raytheon did not return a request for comment.

RUSSIAN RELATIONS

India's deepening security relationship with the U.S., which is fuelled by their shared strategic rivalry with China, was heralded by many U.S. analysts as one of the key areas of foreign-policy progress in the first Trump administration.

Delhi is the world's second-largest arms importer and Russia has traditionally been its top supplier. India has in recent years however, shifted to importing from Western powers like France, Israel and the U.S., according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute think-tank.

The shift in suppliers was driven partly by constraints on Russia's ability to export arms, which it is utilizing heavily in its invasion of Ukraine. Some Russian weapons have also performed poorly in the battlefield, according to Western analysts.

The broader U.S.-India defence partnership, which includes intelligence sharing and joint military exercises, continues without hiccups, one of the Indian officials said.

India also remains open to scaling back on oil imports from Russia and is open to making deals elsewhere, including the U.S., if it can get similar prices, according to two other Indian sources.

Trump's threats and rising anti-U.S. nationalism in India have "made it politically difficult for Modi to make the shift from Russia to the U.S.," one of the people said. Nonetheless, discounts on the landing cost of Russian oil have shrunk to the lowest since 2022.

India's petroleum ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

While the rupture in U.S.-India ties was abrupt, there have been strains in the relationship. Delhi has repeatedly rebutted Trump's claim that the U.S. brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May. Trump also hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House in the weeks following the conflict.

In recent months, Moscow has been actively pitching Delhi on buying new defence technologies like its S-500 surface-to-air missile system, according to one of the Indian officials, as well as a Russian source familiar with the talks.

India currently does not see a need for new arms purchases from Moscow, two Indian officials said.

But Delhi is unlikely to wean itself off Russian weapons entirely as the decades-long partnership between the two powers means Indian military systems will continue to require Moscow's support, one of the officials said.

The Russian embassy in Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.aol.com/exclusive-india-pauses-plans-buy-103435956.html

Trump to remove Billy Long as IRS commissioner, Bessent named acting head, NYT reports

 U.S. President Donald Trump is removing Billy Long as the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, the New York Times reported on Friday, citing four people familiar with the matter.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will serve as acting commissioner until a permanent replacement is in place, the newspaper said, citing a senior administration official.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-remove-billy-long-irs-191323517.html

Massachusetts Sheriff Federally Indicted On Extortion Charges Tied To Boston Weed Business

 A Massachusetts county sheriff, Steven W. Tompkins, 67, was federally indicted on charges of extorting an executive at a cannabis company so that he could own stock in the business - and then demanded his money back when his investment dropped in value, according to the US Attorney's Office.

Tompkins - who has led the Suffolk County Sheriff's Department since his 2013 appointment, was indicted on two counts of extortion under color of official right.

The cannabis company, which was unnamed in the announcement, applied for a license to open a retail dispensary in Boston in 2019 - which required a 'positive impact plan' or PIP, which was satisfied by a partnership with the Suffolk County Sheriff's Department in order to employ released offenders as part of a re-entry program.

According to federal prosecutors, Tompkins pressured a company executive to allow him to purchase stock as the company prepared to go public. The executive, who feared the sheriff could use his position to threaten the PIP plan and their licensing approval - or impact the timing of their IPO, bent the knee to Tompkins' demands.

In November 2020, Tompkins wired $50,000 to purchase stock at around $1.73 per share. After a reverse stock split, he was left with 14,417 shares at a price of $3.46 per share. 

When the IPO launched in 2021, the stock was valued at around $9.60 per share, however by May of 2022 the stock's value had dropped and Tompkins had lost money on the investment. He then demanded a refund of his $50,000 - which the company executive agreed to, and did so in the form of checks issued between May 2022 and July 2023. The executive wrote "loan repayment" or "company expense" to hide their nature, 10 Boston reports.

"Elected officials, particularly those in law enforcement, are expected to be ethical, honest and law abiding – not self-serving. His alleged actions are an affront to the voters and taxpayers who elected him to his position, and the many dedicated and honest public servants at the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department. The people of Suffolk County deserve better," US Attorney Leah B. Foley wrote in a media release

More via the release:

As Sheriff, Tompkins oversees approximately 1,000 correctional officers and other employees responsible for operating and maintaining correctional facilities in Boston at the House of Correction and the Nashua Street Jail.

The charges of extortion under color of official right each provide for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

U.S. Attorney Foley and FBI SAC Docks made the announcement. Special assistance was provided by the Internal Revenue Service. Assistant United States Attorneys John Mulcahy of the Public Corruption & Special Prosecutions Unit and Dustin Chao, Chief of the Public Corruption & Special Prosecutions Unit are prosecuting the case.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/boston-county-sheriff-federally-indicted-extortion-charges