Search This Blog

Saturday, August 9, 2025

'Adams vs. the far-left City Council: 14 vetoes on bills ‘defying common sense’ and counting'

 He’s the last bulwark against The People’s Republic of NYC.

Mayor Eric Adams has vetoed 14 City Council bills and other measures in less than four years in office, a move supporters hailed as critical to thwart the Council’s radical leftist agenda. Adams’ predecessor, avowed Marxist ex-Mayor Bill de Blasio — who enjoyed a good working relationship with his comrades in the Council — never issued a veto during his eight years in office, records show.

“When the City Council pushes unserious or dangerous legislation, it’s the mayor’s duty to stand up and fight back,” said Councilman Robert Holden, a moderate Queens Democrat who also hailed the mayor for vetoing a series of “reckless bills.”

Adams’ critical vetoes include:

  • Legislation that would have banned solitary confinement in city jails. Adams battled a Council override in federal court where in July 2024 a federal judge sided with the city and barred the law from being implemented.
  • a police transparency bill requiring NYPD officers to record all street stops in reports. The Council issued a veto override.
  • a bill to decriminalize illegal vending. The Council is expected to override the veto later this month, sources said.
  • A package of four bills that reformed and expanded the Big Apple’s housing voucher program. The mayor said the bills would lead to longer shelter stays for New Yorkers and saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in additional costs. The migrant-welcoming-Council majority issued overrides on each.
  • Six measures that would have blocked a zoning charge critical to Bally’s $4 billion plan to open a Bronx casino on a former golf course owned by President Donald Trump, who Council Speaker Adrienne Adams has accused of being on a “cruel crusade against immigrant families” for tightening the nation’s borders. The measures — which lack enough support to override Adams’ veto — were pushed by the local councilmember, GOPer Kristy Marmorato.
Mayor Eric Adams has vetoed 14 City Council bills and other measures in less than four years in office.Stephen Yang

The mayor’s supporters say he’s merely exhausting every resource to try blocking lefty measures affecting public-safety and other quality-of-life issues being shoved down New Yorkers’ throats.

“The City Council is out of control,” said Councilwoman Vickie Paladino (R-Queens).

Adams in January 2024 vetoed the Council’s “How Many Stops Act” bill.David McGlynn

“I’m glad he’s tried to use his veto power to keep the progressives in line, but Adrienne Adams can’t find any middle ground on anything and continues to push back on anything in the middle and goes against him on the most common-sense things.”

The Council’s sparring with the mayor extends well beyond his vetoes.

The Council is expected to override the veto on illegal vending later this month, sources said.Christopher Sadowski

Among the political battles are pending legislation Adams opposes that would cost the city $3 billion to remove 300,000 parking spaces near intersections, the budgeting of a free trash bin giveaway, and the legislators’ refusal last year to support the mayor’s nomination of former federal prosecutor Randy Mastro as corporation counsel.

The former top aide for ex-Mayor Rudy Giulaini was hired months later by Adams as first deputy mayor.  

Adams’ rocky relationship with the Council can be traced back to late 2021 when he was planning his transition into the mayor’s seat and failed to whip enough votes from council members to ensure his hand-picked candidate, Councilman Francisco Moya (D-Queens), would be the next speaker.

And that meant opportunity to the left-dominated Council

 “He showed he was an emperor with no clothes by losing his first high-profile fight, so council members realized they could beat him in a fight,” said a former top de Blasio aide.

De Blasio’s “smooth transition” into office in 2014 was partly due to his hand-picked candidate for speaker, Bronx Democrat Melissa Mark-Viverito, winning her speaker race, the source added.

Critics says Adams’ vetoes and much of his other opposition to the Council far-left agenda is showmanship.William Farrington

Critics claim the centrist Democratic mayor’s vetoes and much of his other opposition to the Council majority’s far-left agenda is simply showmanship meant to score votes with voters.

Kayla Mamelak, a mayoral spokeswoman, defended the vetoes, saying the Council has “passed laws so extreme that they defy commonsense and undermine the goals they were elected to achieve.”

“As a result, Mayor Adams has been compelled to use his veto power to call out the Council’s excesses and stand up for working-class, law-abiding New Yorkers who know the difference between commonsense and extremism,” said Mamelak.

“And, now, for the first time in decades, a mayoral veto will not be overridden by the Council — a milestone moment where even many councilmembers realized the Council had gone too far in trying to block the Bally’s casino bid and deny the Bronx and the city as a whole the opportunity to compete for thousands of jobs and billions in economic activity.”

Speaker Adams did not return messages.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/09/us-news/nyc-mayor-adams-vs-the-far-left-city-council-14-vetoes-on-bills-defying-common-sense-and-counting/

Chaotic NYC 'Safe' Injection-Sites Put On Notice By Trump

 Democrats fully own the crime and chaos plaguing major cities, after decades of failed progressive experiments that have only backfired spectacularly, transforming some parts of America's largest metropolitan areas into lawless, crime-ridden no-go zones. 

There's an urgent need for course correction and to restore law and order in major cities run by rogue Democratic leaders whose failed social justice policies (influenced by leftist billionaires and their NGOs), like defunding the police and "safe" injection sites, have only fueled more crime, chaos, and disorder on the streets. 

President Trump's "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets" executive order, issued late last month, has put these taxpayer-funded safe injection sites on notice.

Safe injection sites, such as those run by nonprofit OnPoint NYC in East Harlem and Washington Heights, supervise illegal drug use under the guise of harm reduction.

A clear legal precedent was set in 2019 under President Trump's first term via the Department of Justice that successfully blocked a proposed safe injection site in Philadelphia under the Controlled Substances Act. The Third Circuit upheld the decision, and the Supreme Court let it stand. That ruling could now be used against NYC's injection sites if the Manhattan U.S. Attorney chooses to follow Philadelphia's lead. 

Trump's new order calls on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to ensure that none of its "discretionary grants" indirectly fund such sites, which have been causing significant problems at the local level.

Passed out people line the streets near the safe injection site in East Harlem. Source: NYPOST J.C. Rice

The New York Post released a new report that shows the chaos, madness, and violence outside OnPoint's East Harlem headquarters on a typical afternoon. 

This scene unfolded around 4:30pm on a recent Wednesday afternoon on East 126th, by the OnPoint center. Source: NYPOST J.C. Rice

Some argue that safe injection sites in NYC don't address the root problem of addiction and continue exacerbating the drug crisis.

Neighbors say they’ve repeatedly called 311 and 911 about the situation. Source: NYPOST J.C. Rice

"They're just delaying overdose deaths because they don't address the underlying pathological behavior, which is really injecting yourself with poison," said Charles Lehman, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute

Neighbors say the drug use spills outside the walls of the East 126th center and onto the street. Source: NYPOST J.C. Rice

"Americans deserve to feel safe in their cities and towns. President Trump is providing decisive leadership to protect public safety and end the surrender of our great cities to disorder, homelessness, and crime," said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields.

The nation has come a long way from this. 

Many inner-city communities continue to face hardships after decades of failed progressive policies that are now coming home to roost in a new era of accountability. The White House is moving forward with course-correction measures to address the decay and failed policies put forth by activist Democrats in cities.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/chaotic-nyc-safe-injection-sites-put-notice-trump

The Great Gerrymandering War Of 2025

 


Until President Trump came on the scene, the U.S. Congress basically consisted of Democrats and RINOs with only a few actual Republicans sprinkled throughout the GOP. Thanks to Trump morphing the party into America First Patriots, MAGA Republicans are pushing back at the insanity tossed at us by Democrat—for example, gerrymandering, which communist Democrats have made into an art form. Per Vice President J.D. Vance:

The gerrymander in California is outrageous. Of their 52 congressional districts, nine of them are Republican. That means 17 percent of their delegation is Republican when Republicans regularly win 40 percent of the vote in that state. How can this be possibly allowed?

Consider these blue states based on the 2024 presidential election:

  • Connecticut—President Trump received 41.9 percent of the popular vote. Connecticut has five House seats; zero are Republican.
  • Delaware—President Trump received 41.8 percent of the popular vote. Delaware has one at-large House seat; it is not a Republican.
  • Hawaii—President Trump received 37.1 percent of the popular vote. Hawaii has two House seats; zero are Republican.
  • Maine—President Trump received 45.6 percent of the popular vote. Maine has two House seats; zero are Republican.
  • Maryland—President Trump received 34.4 percent of the popular vote. Maryland has eight House seats, but only one is Republican.
  • Massachusetts—President Trump received 36 percent of the popular vote. Massachusetts has nine House seats; zero are Republican.
  • New Hampshire—President Trump received 47.9 percent of the popular vote. New Hampshire has two House seats; zero are Republican.
  • New Mexico—President Trump received 45.9 percent of the popular vote. New Mexico has three House seats; zero are Republican.
  • Oregon—President Trump received 41 percent of the popular vote. Oregon has six House seats; one is Republican.
  • Rhode Island—President Trump received 41.8 percent of the popular vote. Rhode Island has two House seats; zero are Republican.

If blue states were represented in Congress based on how their citizens voted in presidential elections, there would be fewer Democrats and more Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives. This is why communist Democrats are violently upset that Texas is planning a mid-decade redistricting update and other red states are considering the same. With many blue states already gerrymandered into a lopsided Democrat congressional majority, Democrats can’t go tit-for-tat with Texas.

Except maybe California.

California Gov. Gavin “Hair Gel” Newsom, who thinks he would make a great president (insert laughter here), would like to copy Texas’s plans for redistricting between census counts. However, Herr dictator has a problem.

In 2008, voters approved creating the California Citizens Redistricting Commission (CCRC) to make the process fairer. Using the most recent Census report, every 10 years, CCRC creates a new district map that supposedly makes the population more evenly represented in the U.S. House and state legislature. Unlike Texas, where Governor Greg Abbott could call a special session to create a new redistricting map, Gov. Hair Gel can’t do the same.

Hair Gel’s plan is to hold a special election later in the year for Californians to vote on disbanding the CCRC and returning redistricting to the state legislature. (Insert barf bag here.) Both voters and the legislature would have to approve this change.

Many observers say the special election would just be a façade since Democrats in the state often count ballots until they get the desired results. How can anyone take the results seriously, though, since the state lacks election integrity, as evidenced by mail-in ballots, the ability to vote numerous times in different precincts, multiple ballots sent to the same address or forwarded to an out-of-state address, unprotected ballot drop boxes, dead people voting, and ballots counted weeks after Election Day? North Korea might hold fairer elections than California.

Still, Republicans in the state are intent on keeping the CCRC, and there are some Democrats who also don’t want the legislature to decide redistricting.

Currently, the gerrymandering spotlight is on Texas. Guy Miller of North Carolina, who sends out a daily newswire on national and international events, shared:

One reason that Texas is in such a political mess is that Texas Democrats are smarter than Republicans. Although they are in the minority in the legislature, the Democrats are the ones who elect the Republican leaders. They audition potential Republican leaders to determine which ones will most effectively push their Democrat Party agenda.

When the Democrats are unanimous behind their chosen Republican, the Republicans are too fragmented to manage a majority on their own, so the RINO Republican leadership works for the Democrats, who hire and fire them. That’s why the Democrats always control the Texas legislature.

Redistricting in Texas became an issue when the DOJ Office of Civil Rights, under Harmeet Dhillon, notified the state that five of their Congressional districts are in violation of Federal laws for equal protection under the Constitution. Republicans in Texas know how to fix that, but the Democrats aren’t going to stand for losing any of their bogus Congressional seats.

Truant Democrat legislators hiding in Illinois remain defiant in the face of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s threat to have them removed from office for failure to perform their sworn elected duty, in violation of Texas statutes.

Texas wants our U.S. House of Representatives to be more representative, while California has a communist-like preference. Gerrymandering is another reason why so many U-Hauls in the once Golden State are headed in the direction of the Alamo.

Image created using AI.

Robin M. Itzler is a regular contributor to American Thinker. She is the founder and editor of Patriot Neighbors, a free weekly national newsletter

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/the_great_gerrymandering_war_of_2025.html

Newsom kibbitzes with Texas's runaway Democrats as 15 wildfires burn across California

 


What is it about wildfires that prompts Democrats not be around when their cities and states need them?

When Altadena and Pacific Palisades burned to the ground six month ago, Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass had more important things to do in Ghana, and yes, she knew about the risk before she left. California's governor, Gavin Newsom also had better things to do.

Now Newsom has gone AWOL again, to talk politics with Texas's soon-to-be-unemployed Democrat lawmakers, who have holed up in Illinois and at least some jetting over to California in breach of their duties over a Texas redistricting matter.

According to KCRA:

AUSTIN, Texas —

California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared shoulder-to-shoulder Friday with Texas Democratic lawmakers in a show of support for their nearly weeklong walkout, which has blocked a vote on congressional redistricting maps sought by President Donald Trump in a widening national battle over U.S. House control.

Texas has been the epicenter of Trump’s push to gerrymander congressional maps to shore up Republicans’ narrow House majority before next year. But the standoff is threatening to spill into other states — including California, New York, Florida and Indiana — in an emerging proxy war for control of Congress in 2026.

California is moving toward a special election in November that Democrats hope could slash five Republican-held House seats in the liberal-leaning state, in direct response to the maneuvering in Texas.

“We are trying to defend democracy, as opposed to see it destroyed district by district,” Newsom said amid the crowd of lawmakers at the governor's mansion. “There are no rules for Donald Trump.”

Meanwhile, this is what's going on in California:

California currently has 15 fires burning. Malibu, Porter Ranch & Granada Hills have no water. And Gavin Newsom is partying with Texas Democrats. He's turned 4th largest economy into 3rd world hellhole, romancing illegal aliens, unleashing criminals from prisons, paying homeless… pic.twitter.com/V64ut2Rxfb

— Katy Grimes (@KATYSaccitizen) August 9, 2025

The fire map is here.

Here are the kinds of problems his state is dealing with:

NO water for 3 days in Porter Ranch, through the weekend.

(Can you imagine if there was a fire),!? They’re using pool water to flush toilets
Please note it’s government’s MAIN JOB to avoid situations like this
(This includes keeping reservoirs full) https://t.co/Z44Vcxi6OU

— Mike Netter (@nettermike) August 8, 2025

Might it be reasonable for a governor in a state that is constantly catching fire -- with a lot of them going on now in this bone-dry weather, to just do his job instead of kibbitz with Democrats over how to retain permanent power in Washington?

As the map shows, many of them are burrning out of control with many homes endangered and the state's failure to ensure water for firefighting still a problem. Now anything could happen. Why isn't he on the ground ensuring that firefighters have the resources they need and no bureaucratic bottlenecks will be tolerated?

Newsom's gubernatorial performance during the Los Angeles fires doesn't embarass him a bit, which would explain why he's acting the same way he did last time during this round of wildfires.

For him, a potential loss of office or power in Washington is the five-alarm-fire. The potential burning of more Californians' homes is a spot of bother he'll get around to addressing with smooth talking points at some point. For now, he's taking care of his priorities.

This is disgusting.

 https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/08/newsom_kibbitzes_with_texas_s_runaway_democrats_as_15_wildfires_burn_across_california.html

China's Baidu To Deploy Its Self-Driving Taxis Globally Through Deals With Lyft, Uber

 by Alex Wu via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The “Google of China,” Baidu, and U.S. ride-hailing company Lyft announced on Aug. 4 that they have reached a deal to deploy self-driving taxis in Europe next year.

A taxi driver operating his car on a road alongside a self-driving robotaxi developed as part of tech giant Baidu's Apollo Go self-driving project, in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on Aug. 2, 2024. Pedro PARDO/AFP

The plan, which is still pending regulatory approval, is to use Baidu’s electric RT6 robotaxis to operate on Lyft’s platform. The service will first launch in the UK and Germany.

The two companies aim to deploy thousands of China-made vehicles across Europe in the coming years. Lyft has access to operations in nine countries and more than 180 cities in Europe, after its recent acquisition of European mobility app FreeNow.

The deal with Lyft comes just weeks after Baidu signed a similar agreement with Uber. On July 15, the owners of China’s largest search engine and Uber reached a deal to deploy Baidu’s Apollo Go autonomous vehicles across Uber’s multiple global markets outside of the United States and mainland China, where Uber cannot operate after it agreed to hand over some of its intellectual property to China-based rival DiDi.

The first deployments are expected in Asia and the Middle East later this year,” Uber said in a statement.

By partnering with Uber, Baidu has found a widely used platform that operates in 15,000 cities globally.

“As the world’s largest platform of its kind, spanning mobility, delivery, and freight, Uber is uniquely positioned to help [autonomous vehicle] leaders like Baidu bring their autonomous technology to the world,” Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said in the statement.

Since 2021, Baidu has been operating its own self-driving taxi service, Apollo Go, in major Chinese cities, including Beijing. Users can hail a ride through its app.

A man riding his scooter is followed by a driverless robotaxi autonomous vehicle developed as part of tech giant Baidu's Apollo Go self-driving project, in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on Aug. 1, 2024. Pedro Pardo/AFP

Baidu has been expanding into overseas markets rapidly this year. In May, it announced a partnership with the Roads and Transport Authority of Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to launch autonomous driving services in the city. Baidu will first deploy 100 Apollo Go autonomous vehicles to the United Arab Emirates by the end of 2025—its first international deployment. It aims to expand to 1,000 vehicles by 2028.

Baidu’s partnership with Lyft and Uber “aims to enhance its global brand influence and to seize opportunities to expand in the international smart mobility market to compete with American giants like Waymo and Cruise, and South Korea’s Pony.ai,” Sun Kuo-hsiang, professor of international affairs and business at Nanhua University in Taiwan, told The Epoch Times on Aug. 5.

However, the entry of China-made self-driving car fleets into Europe is likely to spark political and security controversy amid the ongoing tech and trade disputes between China and Europe, and between China and the United States, Sun said.

According to him, as Europe and the United States take up de-risking policies in relation to the national security risks posed by the Chinese Communist Party, “regulators in the European Union and the UK are generally cautious about Chinese companies’ involvement in data and transportation infrastructure.”

“Such deployments will be subject to strict scrutiny, creating significant uncertainty regarding approval,” he said.

Safety and Security Risks

Baidu’s electric self-driving cars use cloud remote control, which allows for remote monitoring and direction, Sun said.

This type of functionality is considered highly risky and is not recommended in the European and American self-driving car industry, as remote intervention can pose significant risks due to network latency or exploitation,” he said.

A screen showing a road map for Baidu's Apollo Go autonomous taxi in Beijing, on Nov. 25, 2021. Jade Gao/AFP via Getty Images

In addition, the Chinese-made self-driving vehicles are equipped with various data collection features, including facial recognition, driving history, and user app management. Sun said this has raised concerns over Beijing’s potential access to collected data.

There are concerns that personal and behavioral data may be collected by the Chinese government as required by Chinese security laws,“ Sun said. ”Chinese authorities could demand that Chinese companies hand over user data, posing a threat to personal privacy.”

U.S.-based China affairs observer Wang He warned of another type of risk posed by Baidu’s electric self-driving cars. Autonomous vehicles have many sensors and “automatically capture a large number of terrain images for the unmanned driving,” he said, which may include images of sensitive areas and sensitive data in other countries. These may be transmitted back to China.

Luo Ya and Reuters contributed to this report.

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/chinas-baidu-deploy-its-self-driving-taxis-globally-through-deals-lyft-uber