Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Brazilian hospital operator Care files for IPO

Brazilian hospital chain Care has filed for an initial public offering of roughly 790.5 million reais ($139.42 million), amid a dealmaking boom in Brazil's healthcare sector, according to a securities filing on Wednesday.

Care's plans for an IPO follows a raft of share offerings by hospital operators. Rede D'Or successfully concluded in December a 11.4 billion reais IPO and rivals such as Kora Saude Participacoes and Dasa are expected to conclude share offerings in the coming weeks.

Rising demand for services and an aging population have fueled deals in Brazil's healthcare sector, as Reuters reported earlier.

Hospital Care and its shareholders plan to sell at least 31 million shares between 22.50 reais and 28.50 reais. If overallotments are sold, the offering may increase by 35%. The price will be set on April 20.

The hospital operator has among its shareholders Brazilian private equity firm Crescera and Elie Horn, the founder of homebuilder Cyrela.

It operates 11 hospital, with 1,206 beds, and also sells healthcare plans, in a business model similar to Hapvida and Notre Dame Intermedica.

Itau BBA, BTG Pactual, Bank of America, XP, Safra and UBS BB will manage the offering. 

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/DIAGN-STICOS-DA-AMERICA-S-6497430/news/Brazilian-hospital-operator-Care-files-for-IPO-32854238/

J&J Says Covid-19 Vaccine Batch Didn't Meet Quality Standards

 Johnson & Johnson said one batch of its new Covid-19 vaccine didn't meet quality standards at a contract manufacturer, and the doses weren't distributed.

J&J said Wednesday the batch never advanced to the filling and finish stages of its manufacturing process, and that the quality lapse wouldn't affect its ability to supply the U.S. with 100 million doses by the end of May.

J&J didn't disclose the nature of the quality lapse or how many doses were affected, but said it arose from quality checks during the start-up phase of manufacturing. The company said it shared information about the issue with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The FDA is investigating, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that the J&J doses were ruined due to an accidental mix-up of ingredients at Emergent BioSolutions Inc., the contract manufacturer working with J&J. The Times reported that about 15 million doses were ruined.

Emergent declined to comment.

J&J's vaccine was the third to be authorized for use against Covid-19, after shots from Pfizer Inc. and its partner BioNTech SE and from Moderna Inc. Health authorities especially welcomed the addition of the J&J vaccine because it requires just one dose and is easier to store.

Supplies in the U.S. were expected to increase as J&J's manufacturing network ramped up production, accelerating a mass vaccination campaign that has been gaining steam.

J&J said it is providing additional experts in manufacturing, technical operations and quality to be on-site at Emergent to oversee all manufacturing of the J&J vaccine there.

Emergent, a contract manufacturer based in Gaithersburg, Md., has been making the main ingredient for J&J's vaccine at an Emergent plant in Baltimore.

At the same plant, Emergent also makes the main ingredient for AstraZeneca PLC's Covid-19 vaccine, which hasn't yet been authorized for use in the U.S.

J&J's own plant in the Netherlands has been making the main ingredient for the initial U.S. supply of its vaccine -- including the nearly four million doses that were distributed immediately after it was authorized in late February.

J&J said it was able to meet a target of delivering a total of 20 million vaccine doses by the end of March. The company said it expects to deliver an additional 24 million doses in April, and plans to have delivered a total of 100 million by the end of May.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/JOHNSON-JOHNSON-4832/news/J-J-Says-Covid-19-Vaccine-Batch-Didn-t-Meet-Quality-Standards-Update-32856726/

Innate immune deficiencies in patients with COVID-19

 Marine Peyneau, Vanessa Granger, Paul-Henri Wicky, Dounia Khelifi-Touhami, Jean-Francois Timsit, Francois-Xavier Lescure, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Alexy Tran-Dihn, Philippe Montravers, Renato Monteiro, Sylvie Chollet-Martin, Margarita Hurtado-Nedelec, 

Luc de Chaisemartin

T Cells Recognize Recent SARS-CoV-2 Variants

 When variants of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) emerged in late 2020, concern arose that they might elude protective immune responses generated by prior infection or vaccination, potentially making re-infection more likely or vaccination less effective. To investigate this possibility, researchers from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, and colleagues analyzed blood cell samples from 30 people who had contracted and recovered from COVID-19 prior to the emergence of virus variants. They found that one key player in the immune response to SARS-CoV-2—the CD8+ T cell—remained active against the virus.

The research team was led by NIAID’s Andrew Redd, Ph.D., and included scientists from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the immunomics-focused company, ImmunoScape.

The investigators asked whether CD8+ T cells in the blood of recovered COVID-19 patients, infected with the initial virus, could still recognize three SARS-CoV-2 variants: B.1.1.7, which was first detected in the United Kingdom; B.1.351, originally found in the Republic of South Africa; and B.1.1.248, first seen in Brazil. Each variant has mutations throughout the virus, and, in particular, in the region of the virus’ spike protein that it uses to attach to and enter cells. Mutations in this spike protein region could make it less recognizable to T cells and neutralizing antibodies, which are made by the immune system’s B cells following infection or vaccination. 

Although details about the exact levels and composition of antibody and T-cell responses needed to achieve immunity to SARS-CoV-2 are still unknown, scientists assume that strong and broad responses from both antibodies and T cells are required to mount an effective immune response.  CD8+ T cells limit infection by recognizing parts of the virus protein presented on the surface of infected cells and killing those cells. 

In their study of recovered COVID-19 patients, the researchers determined that SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell responses remained largely intact and could recognize virtually all mutations in the variants studied. While larger studies are needed, the researchers note that their findings suggest that the T cell response in convalescent individuals, and most likely in vaccinees, are largely not affected by the mutations found in these three variants, and should offer protection against emerging variants.    

Optimal immunity to SARS-Cov-2 likely requires strong multivalent T-cell responses in addition to neutralizing antibodies and other responses to protect against current SARS-CoV-2 strains and emerging variants, the authors indicate. They stress the importance of monitoring the breadth, magnitude and durability of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses in recovered and vaccinated individuals as part of any assessment to determine if booster vaccinations are needed.  

ARTICLE:
AD Redd et al. CD8+ T cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals target conserved epitopes from multiple prominent SARS-CoV-2 circulating variants. Open Forum Infectious Diseases DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab143 (2021).

WHO:
Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., NIAID Director and Chief, Laboratory of Immunoregulation, is available to comment on this research. Dr. Andrew Redd, staff scientist in the Laboratory of Immunoregulation, is also available.

This work was supported in part by NIAID grants R01AI120938, R01AI120938S1 and R01AI128779 and by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute grant 1K23HL151826-01.

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/t-cells-recognize-recent-sars-cov-2-variants

J&J Covid Vax Distribution Delayed by U.S. Factory Mix-up: NYT

 --A mix-up at a U.S. factory will delay distribution of the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine, the New York Times reported.

--The NYT said that workers at the Baltimore plant had accidentally conflated the vaccine's ingredients weeks ago and ruined about 15 million doses of Johnson & Johnson's vaccine.

--The plant is run by Emergent BioSolutions, a manufacturing partner to Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca PLC, the NYT said.

--Johnson & Johnson vaccine doses currently being delivered and used nationwide were produced in the Netherlands and are not affected, the NYT reported, adding that all further shipments of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine were supposed to have come from the Baltimore plant and are now in question while the quality control issues are sorted out.

In after-hours trading, Johnson & Johnson shares were down 0.33% at $163.81, while Emergent Solutions' stock was down 4.85% at $88.40.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/JOHNSON-JOHNSON-4832/news/Johnson-Johnson-Covid-19-Vaccine-Distribution-Delayed-by-U-S-Factory-Mix-up-NYT-Reports-32856355/

Experimental antibodies for Parkinson's, Alzheimer's may cause harmful inflammation

 A team led by scientists at Scripps Research has made a discovery suggesting that experimental antibody therapies for Parkinson's and Alzheimer's have an unintended adverse effect--brain inflammation--that may have to be countered if these treatments are to work as intended.

Experimental antibody treatments for Parkinson's target abnormal clumps of the protein alpha-synuclein, while experimental antibody treatments for Alzheimer's target abnormal clumps of amyloid beta protein. Despite promising results in mice, these potential treatments so far have not seen much success in clinical trials.

"Our findings provide a possible explanation for why antibody treatments have not yet succeeded against neurodegenerative diseases," says study co-senior author Stuart Lipton, MD, PhD, Step Family Foundation Endowed Chair in the Department of Molecular Medicine and founding co-director of the Neurodegeneration New Medicines Center at Scripps Research.

Lipton, also a clinical neurologist, says the study marks the first time that researchers have examined antibody-induced brain inflammation in a human context. Prior research was conducted in mouse brains, whereas the current study used human brain cells.

The study will appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America during the week of March 29.

An approach that may need tweaking

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's afflict more than 6 million Americans. These diseases generally feature the spread of abnormal protein clusters in the brain, with different mixes of proteins predominating in different disorders.

An obvious treatment strategy, which pharmaceutical companies began to pursue in the 1990s, is to inject patients with antibodies that specifically target and clear these protein clusters, also called aggregates.

The aggregates have included not only the large clusters that pathologists observe in patients' brains at autopsy, but also the much smaller and harder-to-detect clusters called oligomers that are now widely considered the most harmful to the brain.

Exactly how these protein clusters damage brain cells is an area of active investigation, but inflammation is a likely contributing factor. In Alzheimer's, for example, amyloid beta oligomers are known to shift brain immune cells called microglia to an inflammatory state in which they can damage or kill healthy neurons nearby.

Surprise finding

Lipton and colleagues were studying alpha synuclein oligomers' ability to trigger this inflammatory state when they encountered a surprise finding: While the oligomers on their own triggered inflammation in microglia derived from human stem cells, adding therapeutic antibodies made this inflammation worse, not better. The team traced this effect not to the antibodies per se but to the complexes formed with antibodies and their alpha synuclein targets.

Amyloid beta aggregates often co-exist with the alpha synuclein aggregates seen in Parkinson's brains, just as alpha synuclein often co-exists with amyloid beta in Alzheimer's brains.

In the study, the researchers added amyloid beta oligomers to their mix, mimicking what would happen in a clinical case, and found that it worsened inflammation. Adding anti-amyloid beta antibodies worsened it even further. They found that both alpha synuclein antibodies and amyloid beta antibodies made inflammation worse when they successfully hit their oligomer targets.

Lipton notes that virtually all prior studies of the effects of experimental antibody treatments were done with mouse microglia, whereas the key experiments in this study were done with human-derived microglia--either in cell cultures or transplanted into the brains of mice whose immune system had been engineered to accommodate the human microglia.

"We see this inflammation in human microglia, but not in mouse microglia, and thus this massive inflammatory effect may have been overlooked in the past," Lipton says.

Microglial inflammation of the kind observed in the study, he adds, could conceivably reverse any benefit of antibody treatment in a patient without being clinically obvious.

Lipton says that he and his colleagues have recently developed an experimental drug that may be able to counter this inflammation and thereby restore any benefit of antibody treatment in the human brain. They are actively working on this now.

###

The lead author of the study was Dorit Truder, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the Lipton laboratory. Other senior authors were Rajesh Ambasudhan, PhD, an adjunct assistant professor at Scripps Research; Michael Karin, PhD, a professor at the UC San Diego School of Medicine; and Nicholas Schork, PhD, a professor at the Translational Genomics Institute in Phoenix and adjunct professor at UC San Diego and Scripps Research.

"Soluble α-synuclein/antibody complexes activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in hiPSC-derived microglia" was co-authored by Dorit Trudler, Kristopher Nazor, Yvonne Eisele, Titas Grabauskas, Nima Dolatabadi, James Parker, Abdullah Sultan, Zhenyu Zhong, Marshal Goodwin, Yona Levites, Todd Golde, Jeffery Kelly, Michael Sierks, Nicholas Schork, Michael Karin, Rajesh Ambasudhan and Stuart Lipton.

The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS086890, RF1 AG057409, R01 AG056259, R01 DA048882, DP1 DA041722, R01 AI043477).

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-03/sri-eaf032621.php

Aptevo Reports 2020 Results, Business Update

 Advances Phase 1/1b Study of APVO436 for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myelodysplastic Syndrome; Enrollment in Cohort 10 Ongoing

Completes Sale of RUXIENCE Royalty Payments for Up Front Plus Milestone Payments of up to $67.5 million; Amends Non-Dilutive Term Loan Agreement

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/aptevo-therapeutics-reports-2020-financial-results-and-provides-business-update/