At an April 7 news conference,
Deborah Birx, MD, the response coordinator for the White House
coronavirus task force, said, “There are other countries that if you had
a pre-existing condition and let’s say the virus caused you to go to
the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem — some countries are
recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19
death. Right now … if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as
a COVID-19 death.”
That statement might make you conclude that the U.S. COVID-19 data
will be skewed to count many people who died with COVID-19 as an
irrelevant background condition, inflating the numbers up from the count
of those who clearly died from the effects of the virus. Yet the New York Times, the Washington Post,
and many other news agencies have reported stories showing that the
tally of COVID-19 deaths in the United States and elsewhere in the world
is almost certainly an undercount. They cite epidemiological data
showing that the overall numbers of deaths during the months of this
pandemic have far outpaced the death rate during the same period in
recent past years, and postulate that the lack of available testing
might be a reason why COVID-19 would not make it onto a death
certificate.
So which one is it? Are we undercounting or overcounting? Can we trust the numbers?
It’s complicated. In the United States, most death investigation
systems are funded and organized on a county basis across hundreds of
agencies. Early in the pandemic, when testing was not readily available
and community spread was present but not yet recognized, it is likely
that, in some areas, patients with underlying disease and poor health
may have died from undiagnosed COVID-19 infection. Other regions, the
ones that responded to the outbreak by developing widespread testing,
might be swabbing every decedent regardless of the circumstances of
death, either as a public health screening program to gather data on
community spread, or in order to protect morgue workers from infectious
disease exposure during an autopsy.
Regardless of the availability of testing at their disparate death
investigation agencies, medical examiners and coroners across the
country are guided by the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) guidelines
for death certification. A death certificate has two sections where the
doctor who investigated the case will write the cause of death. Part I
is the underlying disease or injury that starts the lethal sequence of
events. Part II is for any other underlying conditions that the decedent
had that made the death more likely.
The NVSS guidelines state, “If COVID-19 played a role in the death,
this condition should be specified on the death certificate. In many
cases, it is likely that it will be the underlying cause of death, as it
can lead to various life-threatening conditions, such as pneumonia and
acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In some cases, survival from
COVID-19 can be complicated by pre-existing chronic conditions,
especially those that result in diminished lung capacity, such as
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. These medical
conditions do not cause COVID-19, but can increase the risk of
contracting a respiratory infection and death, so these conditions
should be reported in Part II and not in Part I.”
So, pathologists don’t certify deaths as due to COVID-19 based solely
on a positive nasopharyngeal swab. We get a clinical history of
shortness of breath, chest pain, fever, cough. Yes, it is possible that
someone could be an asymptomatic carrier and die of heart disease — but
in those cases we would certify the cause of death as heart disease and
document the COVID-19 infection as a significant contributing condition,
for several reasons.
Number one, COVID-19 can affect the heart (via myocarditis,
pericarditis, or the formation of microthrombi). Number two, it’s
possible that the death may not have happened without the stress on
medical resources caused by the pandemic. That’s one of the reasons why
the death toll in Italy is so bad — their otherwise excellent healthcare
system was grievously overloaded by a huge wave of COVID-19 patients.
People who would’ve survived heart attacks during normal times died
without medical intervention because they couldn’t make it to the
hospital or because the hospital couldn’t treat them in time to save
them. On some level it may be true that some natural-manner deaths being
attributed to the virus could be seen as inflating the official
COVID-19 numbers, but a failure to acknowledge and examine the
pandemic’s effect on the diagnosis and treatment of other natural deaths
would also be problematic from a public health perspective.
To quote Dr. Ed Donoghue, a forensic pathology colleague at the
Georgia Bureau of Investigation, “No matter how these deaths are
currently being attributed, after this pandemic terminates, an excellent
approximation of the true fatality rate of COVID-19 deaths can be made
by the calculation of the excess mortality for the period. This
calculation was very helpful during the 1995 Chicago heat wave.
Almost certainly, because of the scarcity of testing and other reasons,
we will find that the number of COVID-19 deaths has been grossly
underestimated.” The final death toll is going to depend on multiple
factors: the density of the population; availability of testing; genetic
factors (both host and virus); the public health response; and the
robustness of the healthcare system.
A soldier in the heat of battle can’t think strategically about the
outcome of the wider war. The death toll of COVID-19 is not going to be
accurate until epidemiologists and statisticians have time to crunch the
numbers. But the excess stresses on our healthcare system are clearly
evident in countless firsthand reports from emergency rooms and ICUs in
our hardest-hit regions. The challenges of formulating a real-time body
count must not be offered as an excuse to abandon or dial back the
mitigation measures that we know are working to keep whole populations
alive and safe. We are slogging through a slow, brutal, worldwide
mass-fatality event. Whatever the final tally, it will be a terrible
one.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85925
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.