A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a two-page order saying that the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has the authority to decide whether to issue new rules during the pandemic.
“In light of the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the regulatory tools that the OSHA has at its disposal to ensure that employers are maintaining hazard-free work environments … the OSHA reasonably determined that an ETS [emergency temporary standard] is not necessary at this time,” the panel said in its order.
“COVID-19’s toll in mortality and morbidity among workers and the general public has exceeded the expectations of many prognosticators,” lawyers for the AFL-CIO wrote in their petition.
“Yet in a stunning act of agency nonfeasance in the midst of a workplace health emergency of a magnitude not seen in this country for over a century (if ever), OSHA has neither responded directly to, nor taken formal action on, either of the two pending ETS petitions, nor has it shown any inclination to adopt mandatory, legally-enforceable, COVID-19-specific rules to protect workers.”
But the lawsuit faced an uphill battle considering the amount of deference that the courts grant to federal agencies.
“We are very disappointed that three judges did not deem the lives of America’s workers worthy of holding an argument or issuing a full opinion,” AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said in a statement responding to the decision.
Scalia responded in a letter saying that his agency had issued strong guidelines to protect workers and that the labor groups’ proposal would unnecessarily “burden employers and overwhelm OSHA with information.”
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/502249-appeals-court-rejects-afl-cio-lawsuit-over-lack-of-covid-19-labor
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.