Chanel, Revlon and L’Oreal, three of the biggest brands in cosmetics,
are quietly moving away from using talc in some products as U.S. cancer
lawsuits and consumer concerns mount.
Luxury beauty company Chanel has removed talc from a loose face
powder and dropped a talc body powder because of negative perceptions
around the mineral, court documents reviewed by Reuters show.
Revlon Inc removed talc from its body products, and L’Oreal SA is
exploring alternatives for the mineral, those companies told Reuters.
The moves come amid a reappraisal of talc in body powders and
cosmetics by consumers, regulators and manufacturers. Talc – which is
sometimes found in the same rock as asbestos, a potent carcinogen – is
used in thousands of cosmetic and personal care products to absorb
moisture, prevent caking and add softness.
Thousands of cancer lawsuits, some dating back to 2013, have been
filed against body-powder market leader Johnson & Johnson.
Allegations that asbestos contamination caused plaintiffs’ cancers began
in 2017. Other makers of talc powders also face suits, including
Revlon, Chanel and Avon, securities filings and court records show.
Scrutiny of talc products intensified after a 2018 Reuters investigation https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer reported that J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its talc and powders. The company has disp
uted Reuters’ report and maintains its powders are safe and asbestos free.https://reut.rs/2BShyeh
J&J announced last month that it would stop selling talc Baby
Powder in the United States and Canada, attributing the decision to
declining sales and negative publicity.
In March, a Chanel representative disclosed in a court deposition
that in 2017 the company had stopped making a talc-based body powder,
scented with its iconic No. 5 fragrance that it had made since 1924. The
deposition was taken in a 2018 case filed in a Los Angeles court. In
it, a California woman alleges she got mesothelioma, in part from
asbestos-tainted Chanel and J&J powders she used for decades.
Asbestos is the only well established cause of mesothelioma, an
incurable rare cancer of the lining of the lungs and other organs.
Chanel representative Amy Wyatt said in the deposition that Chanel
was sued for the first time over its talc powder in 2016 and she denied
Chanel powders contained asbestos.
“We know that it was a safe product,” Wyatt said in the deposition.
But “we determined from public perception to remove it from the market.”
Wyatt said Chanel had also removed talc from its loose face powder,
but she was not sure when the new formulation would be on the market.
She did not say what the talc was replaced with.
Chanel told Reuters that it routinely updates its products “to ensure
we continue to meet our customers’ changing needs and expectations,” a
spokeswoman said in an email.
Chanel, which continues to use talc in other products including
pressed powder, blush and eye shadow, said all the talc it uses is
“selected according to strict purity criteria, fully complies with
current global regulations, and is safe under standard conditions of
cosmetic use.”
The privately held company did not respond to questions about the deposition or litigation.
A Revlon spokesman told Reuters the company removed talc from its
body products. He declined to say when or why; he also declined to
comment on litigation.
L’Oreal said it is looking for a talc replacement but has not found anything that works as well.
“Well known partial alternatives exist, and we continue to explore
and seriously consider performant alternatives,” a spokeswoman told
Reuters in an email. “But none meet the same performance for our
products.”
L’Oreal – like other companies – requires its suppliers to certify
annually that its talc is asbestos-free, and it does in-house testing,
she said.
“We have not detected any trace of asbestos in any of our raw
materials containing more than 20% talcum powder,” L’Oreal’s spokeswoman
said.
Other personal care companies have also stopped selling talc powder.
Germany’s Beiersdorf said it switched to corn starch in its Nivea baby
powder in 2018. Bausch Health changed the formula of its Shower to
Shower powder in 2018 “to keep the product in line with market trends
and customer preferences,” and not because of safety concerns, a
spokeswoman said.
Bausch, which last sold talc powder in February 2019, has been named
in 165 lawsuits; 12 are pending, though Bausch is indemnified by
J&J, the brand’s prior owner, for any liability, securities filings
show.
Avon, which declined to comment, said in a securities filing that 128 lawsuits were pending against it over talc products.
Sanofi, maker of Gold Bond powder, told Reuters it stood by the
safety of its talc powder and was “vigorously” contesting talc lawsuits
against it.
“Sanofi will continue to evaluate its product offerings in light of supply and consumer demand,” a spokesman said.
Globally, consumers are expected to purchase 139,350 tonnes of talc
this year, down 0.6 percent from last year, according to Euromonitor
International.
Last year, during an analysis of 52 talc-containing cosmetic
products, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found asbestos in nine
products, including three sold by tween retailer Claire’s and one bottle
of Johnson’s Baby Powder. All products were voluntarily recalled.
A spokeswoman said Claire’s had stopped using talc, and replaced it with mica in most of its products.
The FDA is analyzing 50 more samples this year and is considering
establishing an asbestos testing standard. Canada’s Health Ministry
tentatively concluded in 2018 that talc itself may cause lung problems
if inhaled, and ovarian cancer if used in the genital area. A final
decision, expected next year, could lead to a ban or restriction on the
use of talc in certain products in Canada.
https://www.marketscreener.com/news/Exclusive-Chanel-Revlon-L-Oreal-pivoting-away-from-talc-in-some-products–30744270/?countview=0
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.