Search This Blog

Saturday, September 8, 2018

Startups eye turning young blood into exilir of youth


IN THE EARLY 2000s, a handful of young scientists at Stanford turned the university’s Palo Alto campus into the mouse-stitching-together capital of the world. Reviving a centuries-old procedure known as parabiosis, they connected the circulatory systems of dozens of pairs of rodents, young sutured to old, so that they’d pump one another’s blood back and forth. The grisly experiments rejuvenated the aging mice, making them stronger and healthier, and introducing the 21st century’s longevity enthusiasts to the therapeutic potential of young blood.
While much work remains to be done on how this regenerative process actually works, Stanford’s parabiosis studies have since inspired the creation of a handful of ambitious startups aimed at producing similarly dramatic effects in humans. Today, the latest young-blood medicine-maker, Elevian, emerged from stealth with $5.5 million from investors including Peter Diamandis, one of the more prominent faces in the Silicon Valley “death disruption” scene.
Beneath all the hype is some striking science. Blood, particularly the yellow liquid part of it known as plasma, is chock full of proteins and other compounds that act like a readout of how all the cells in the body are functioning. Research has shown that the ratios of those components change as animals, including humans, age. Older blood carries more signs of tissue damage than young blood, which often contains compounds that can stimulate cell growth and repair. Elevian has singled out one of these proteins, a growth differentiation factor known as GDF11, as the chief source of young blood’s rejuvenating effects.
At the outset, the company is developing drugs based on GDF11 to treat Alzheimer’s, coronary heart disease, and age-related muscle dysfunction. But its founders say any disease of the elderly is on the table. “What’s really unique here is that you can improve the function of tissue that’s already been damaged, regardless of what caused the damage,” says Lee Rubin, a neuroscientist at Harvard and one of Elevian’s five scientific cofounders. “That suggests a way forward for treating many different disorders.”
Rubin began studying longevity in 2006, when he left a career in biotech to join the Harvard faculty. He soon found himself teaching a course on aging with a young stem cell biologist named Amy Wagers, a pioneer of Stanford’s parabiosis studies. She was looking for collaborators to continue her work on the East Coast, to tease out the impact of young blood on different kinds of tissues. Together they discovered that young blood sparks the formation of new neurons in the brain. Working with other Harvard researchers, Wagers found that it could also reverse age-related thickening of the walls of the heart.
Bolstered by these results, Wagers and her collaborators went looking for the ingredients in young blood responsible for the rejuvenating effects. One molecule, a growth protein known as GDF11, jumped out. In two eye-popping papers in Science in 2014, Wagers’ group reported that GDF11, injected on its own, made old mice stronger, increased blood flow to their brains, and even improved their memories. Those results have since become a subject of sore scientific debate—researchers at pharmaceutical firm Novartis published a subsequent report suggesting that high doses of GDF11 actually cause muscle wasting in mice.
Despite the controversy, Elevian has licensed the Harvard team’s portfolio of patents around GDF11, which includes the protein as it’s found naturally in the body, according to cofounder and CEO Mark Allen. One challenge is that GDF11 degrades quickly, so he says Elevian is also investigating drug formulations that don’t require daily injections. “We’re working with biology, so we have to respect its complexity,” Allen says.
It’s exactly that complexity that makes some aging experts skeptical of Elevian’s leap to the clinic. “I don’t think GDF11 is going to ultimately be the panacea people hope it will be,” says Ron Kohanski, a deputy director in the division of aging biology at the National Institute on Aging. He points out that GDF11 comes in many forms, not all of them active. Some need specific binding partners to turn on, which may not be present in all tissues at all ages.
In 2017, the National Institute on Aging committed $2.35 million in funds for scientists to better understand the mechanisms behind the young-blood effect. Kohanski wrote the call for grant applications. “Obviously I think there’s a lot of potential in the findings from the parabiosis experiments,” he says. “But the key question is what’s doing this. And the answer is we don’t yet know.”
There are more than 10,000 proteins in blood plasma—blood minus the blood cells—so Elevian’s focus on GDF11 is only one of many avenues pursued by longevity startups.
In 2016, a company called Ambrosia launched the first human trial of young plasma transfusions, charging patients $8,000 a pop to participate. Anyone over 35 with the necessary cash was eligible to receive two liters of plasma donated by young adults, which Ambrosia purchases from blood banks. Given the fee and the lack of a placebo treatment to compare it to, scientists and bioethicists have questioned the rigor of the study. But those barbs haven’t stopped Ambrosia’s founder, Jesse Karmazin, from being bullish on the (unpublished) results of the trial, which he announced for the first time at the Recode technology conference last May.
“We measured 113 biomarkers 30 days after the transfusion and we saw a durable, but not permanent, effect,” says Karmazin, who has an MD from Stanford but no license to practice medicine. (He initially conducted the trial with a physician who runs a private intravenous therapy center in Monterey, California, but later moved to sites in San Francisco and Tampa after a falling out between them.) Karmazin says the study participants described feeling stronger, more awake, and as if their memory had improved. “We saw results that were consistent with the preclinical work in mice.”
He says the next move for Ambrosia is to open up a series of clinics, targeting cities with big aging populations in parts of the country where early adopters are likely to live—places like New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and, of course, Florida. For the moment the company is keeping quiet about when exactly that might happen, but Karmazin believes they’ll be the first to do it. They may find it challenging to recruit clients. Ambrosia’s trial initially intended to enroll 600 patients, but in the end only included 81 individuals. There’s no word yet on what the treatment will cost.
Ambrosia, with its off-label use of an FDA-approved blood product, is about as far from Elevian’s needle-in-the-haystack approach as you can get. Between them is Alkahest, a Stanford spin-out from the lab of neurologist Tony Wyss-Coray, which is searching for an optimized plasma cocktail—the right mix of beneficial proteins without any of the bad ones—to treat Alzheimer’s.
Wyss-Coray, who worked next door to the lab where Wager began her parabiosis studies, showed in his own mouse-enstein experiments that young blood could improve memory and learning in older rodents. In subsequent experiments he injected middle-aged mice with young plasma to similarly sprightly effect. His research caught the eye of the youngest member of a wealthy family in Hong Kong, a molecular biologist who had noticed that his grandfather’s Alzheimer’s symptoms seemed to temporarily improve every time he got a plasma transfusion as part of a cancer treatment. In 2014, the family provided the funds to seed Wyss-Coray’s company and launch Alkahest’s first clinical trial to test the safety of young plasma for treating Alzheimer’s in 18 patients at Stanford. The results, which were recently accepted for publication, suggest that even a short course of weekly infusions could improve some of the disease’s symptoms.
Alkahest recently began enrolling patients in a larger trial, backed by a $37.5 million investment from plasma company Grifols. The Spanish firm makes many different products from harvested blood—antibodies, albumin, factor VIII for hemophiliacs—that leaves behind many discardable plasma mixtures. After screening those waste products for regenerative effects in mice, Alkahest hit on one that’s more potent than the others. They’re now testing that potential elixir in humans, with plans to enroll 40 Alzheimer’s patients in California and Florida. In addition to testing cognitive function, the trial will also sample patient fluids for signs of improved health.
“Ultimately we want to find out what the key ingredients are, because if it really works plasma donations won’t be sufficient to treat everybody,” says Wyss-Coray. According to the American Association of Blood Banks, 60 percent of the declining US blood supply comes from donations made by people over the age of 40. The young blood field still has plenty of maturing to do, but in this case growing up doesn’t have to mean growing old.

Hearing Aids Are Finally Entering the 21st Century


Most people probably associate three things with hearing aids: an elderly demographic, beige plastic construction and high-pitched feedback in public places. As it turns out, all those notions are now obsolete—or will be soon.
The most popular hearing-aid style is still the one that rests over your ear—a design that debuted in the 1950s. You know what else is decades old? Our country’s system for getting and paying for hearing aids.
Basic Medicare and most other insurance providers have never paid for adult hearing aids. At an average cost of $4,700 a pair, that makes hearing aids the third-largest purchase in most people’s lives after a house and a car.
The channel for buying hearing aids hasn’t changed in 60 years, either: You must buy them from an audiologist or doctor. They’re not available over the counter or by mail order.
Only six companies make most of the world’s hearing aids, and they sell them directly through hearing specialists. (You can buy “personal sound amplification products” in stores, but they can’t be marketed as hearing aids. In any case, most are fairly crude and ineffective for severe hearing loss.)
That’s one reason the price of hearing aids hasn’t dropped over time, the way most electronics do: the medical professionals you have to go through account for a significant fraction of the cost. Bottom line: many people who need them don’t get them.
“This is the sad part,” says Frank Lin, director of the Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “About 20 percent of adults who have a hearing loss actually use a hearing aid. I mean, 20 percent. And this figure hasn’t changed in decades.”
The other 80 percent may wind up missing out on a lot more than conversation in a noisy restaurant. Lin’s studies, which followed older adults for many years, revealed that hearing loss is “incredibly strongly” linked to serious outcomes, including impaired thinking, greater risk of hospitalization, even dementia.
Appalled at these findings, Lin teamed up with the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, under Barack Obama, and other groups to pursue a radical agenda: deregulating hearing aids. The result passed last year with bipartisan support. It requires that the FDA develop a new category of over-the-counter hearing aids, including safety and reliability standards.
The new law, Lin says, will lower the price and remove obstacles to innovation—and so help more patients. “People widely expect that companies like Bose, Samsung and Apple could all enter the market now,” he observes. Obviously the concept of over-the-counter aids isn’t popular with today’s manufacturers, who will lose their exclusivity.
“The concern is people trying to self-diagnose, people trying to self-program,” says Chris McCormick, chief marketing officer at Starkey Hearing Technologies, the only U.S.-based company among the big six hearing-aid makers. “The products will have to be standardized, and the problem is that everybody’s hearing is different.” Even so, Starkey and others are preparing for the new marketplace. Part of that is taking the hearing aid well beyond the realm of sound processing.
Later this year Starkey will release a new model that incorporates Fitbit-like health and heart rate monitoring and another that will automatically notify a loved one if you fall and can’t get up. Bose already sells something called Hearphones—with noise cancellation, directional microphones and various sound-processing options—that are moderate-strength hearing aids in all but name.
As for those popular misconceptions: Many hearing aids today aren’tbeige (turns out that matching them to your hair color is better camouflage). Most have antifeedback circuitry.
And now, thanks partly to the new law, older people may not be the primary customer demographic. Your ear turns out to be a great, inconspicuous place for a computer to hide, as the movie Her brilliantly depicted. Hearing aids may mostly aid your hearing—but soon they’ll help with directions, read our messages, play our music and track our health, all without the distraction of a smartphone screen. This could be the dawn of a new ear era.

Brookdale Senior Living: Hurricane Watch, Tropical Storm Florence Warning


Updated 5 PM EST – 9/8/18
Tropical Storm Florence is becoming better organized over the Atlantic Ocean and is increasingly likely to either make landfall or strike a part of the U.S. East Coast as a formidably strong hurricane mid- to late next week.
We are monitoring the storm and have storm preparedness plans in place. Our coastal communities are equipped with water, food, permanent or temporary generators and supplies to care for residents.
We are taking appropriate actions to keep them safe throughout the storm, watching the storm closely and we will follow the directions of authorities.
We will update this website and community Facebook pages with updated information as we receive it.

Osteoarthritis research effort works to understand cartilage development


USC scientists are exploring the processes of growing stem-cell derived cartilage cells.
Credit: Ben Van Handel/Denis Evseenko Lab/USC Stem Cell
There are more than 3 million cases of arthritis in the U.S. each year, and osteoarthritis is the most common type. In patients, cartilage — the slick surface on the ends of bones — wears away, bone rubs against bone, causing swelling and stiffness.
Now Keck School of Medicine of USC scientists in the USC Stem Cell laboratory of Denis Evseenko have collaborated with colleagues to offer new insights on how gene activity drives the development of cartilage. Their findings appear Friday in Nature Communications.
Based on their studies, the scientists identified and characterized, for the first time, unique cell populations that form the superficial zone of human joint cartilage. The zone has the most critical role in cushioning the joint and is often partially or completely lost in arthritis.
“Our results not only offer a unique molecular atlas of human skeletal development, but also define a strategy for joint cartilage repair,” said Evseenko, the study’s corresponding author and an associate professor of orthopedic surgery, and stem cell biology and regenerative medicine at the Keck School of Medicine.
Osteoarthritis research: gene activity of human cartilage cells
In a series of experiments, postdoctoral scholar-research associate Gabriel Ferguson and postdoctoral scholar-research associate Ben Van Handel and colleagues compared the gene activity of developing human cartilage cells with several other cell types.
First they compared the cartilage cells to four other types of developing human cells: the precursors to bone, muscle, tendon and ligament. As the cartilage matured, the genes specific to cartilage became increasingly active, while genes related to the other cell types became repressed.
The scientists then compared these developing human cartilage cells to equivalent cells from mice. The team found many broad similarities in gene activity.
The researchers also carried out a detailed comparison of ordinary human cartilage cells and stem cell-derived human cartilage cells, taking into account genetics, genetic regulation and function. They demonstrated that stem cell-derived cartilage does not fully develop in the Petri dish but rather retains the genetic hallmarks typical of fetal cartilage. However, if the scientists transplanted stem cell-derived human cartilage at a particular stage of development into an arthritic rat, the cartilage would lose its fetal hallmarks and fully mature — regenerating the critical superficial zone.
Other authors were Maxwell Bay, Siyoung Lee, Ruzanna Shkhyan, Nicholas Banks, Mila Scheinberg, Biagio Saitta, Joseph Elphingstone and Michael Bonaguidi from USC; Petko Fiziev, April Pyle, Nicholas Bernthal, Hanna KA Mikkola and Jason Ernst from UCLA; Tonis Org from UCLA and the University of Tartu in Estonia; Ling Wu from InVitro Cell Research; and A. Noelle Larson, Scott Riester and Andre van Wijnen from the Mayo Clinic.
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (award number R01AR071734), the U.S. Department of Defense (award number W81XWH-13-1-0465) and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (award numbers RB5-07230-B and TRAN1-09288).
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of Southern California. Original written by Cristy Lytal. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Gabriel B. Ferguson, Ben Van Handel, Maxwell Bay, Petko Fiziev, Tonis Org, Siyoung Lee, Ruzanna Shkhyan, Nicholas W. Banks, Mila Scheinberg, Ling Wu, Biagio Saitta, Joseph Elphingstone, A. Noelle Larson, Scott M. Riester, April D. Pyle, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Hanna KA Mikkola, Jason Ernst, Andre J. van Wijnen, Michael Bonaguidi, Denis Evseenko. Mapping molecular landmarks of human skeletal ontogeny and pluripotent stem cell-derived articular chondrocytesNature Communications, 2018; 9 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05573-y

A new generation of pain medications


Researchers from Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Zuse Institute Berlin have developed a new generation of pain medications. The researchers used computer simulations to develop new opioids that will only work at sites affected by injury or inflammation. These drugs can prevent the occurrence of brain- and gut-related side effects typically associated with conventional opioids and have been shown to be successful in preclinical studies. Results from this research have been published in Pain and Scientific Reports.
Opioids are a class of drugs with powerful pain-relieving properties. They are mainly used to treat the pain associated with tissue damage and inflammation, such as that caused by surgery or cancer. Common side effects associated with their use include drowsiness, nausea, constipation, dependency and, in some cases, respiratory arrest. The research team, which is led by Prof. Dr. Christoph Stein of the Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine on Campus Benjamin Franklin, are hoping to develop new types of pain medications which will work without producing dangerous side effects. Collaborating with PD Dr. Marcus Weber of the Zuse Institute Berlin, the researchers used computer simulations to develop two new opioids. In both cases, the researchers used fentanyl as the starting molecule.
The researchers hypothesized that tissues which are damaged or inflamed show stronger interaction between ‘opioid agonists’ — the substances that elicit the pain-relieving effect — and the opioid receptors they bind to. Their computer simulations suggested that this is due to an increased concentration of protons in inflamed tissues, which leads to lower pH values than in healthy tissues, resulting in acidic conditions. Opioid molecules need to undergo protonation before they can bind to and activate opioid receptors. The researchers used this knowledge to design two drugs that would only exist in their protonated state in the presence of inflammation. This restricts opioid receptor activation to sites of tissue damage or inflammation, rather than receptors in the brain or gut.
“Our innovative design method provides a robust basis for a new generation of pain medications,” reports Prof. Stein. He adds: “These drugs could help us both to avoid the dangerous side effects of conventional opioids and to reduce complications. They would also help us stem the opioid crisis, a problem that is particularly evident in the United States.”
The researchers hope to further develop these newly-designed drugs in order to make them available to patients. They also plan to enhance their understanding of the molecular processes underlying the complex interactions seen in inflamed tissues, in the hope that they may be able to support opioid optimization through the insights they gain. Ideally, their insights will also be beneficial for other drugs, such as those used to treat high blood pressure.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Charité – Universitätsmedizin BerlinNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal References:
  1. Antonio Rodriguez-Gaztelumendi, Viola Spahn, Dominika Labuz, Halina Machelska, Christoph Stein. Analgesic effects of a novel pH-dependent μ-opioid receptor agonist in models of neuropathic and abdominal painPAIN, 2018; 1 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001328
  2. Viola Spahn, Giovanna Del Vecchio, Antonio Rodriguez-Gaztelumendi, Julia Temp, Dominika Labuz, Michael Kloner, Marco Reidelbach, Halina Machelska, Marcus Weber, Christoph Stein. Opioid receptor signaling, analgesic and side effects induced by a computationally designed pH-dependent agonistScientific Reports, 2018; 8 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27313-4

A New, Healthy Way To Tap Emerging Markets


A pair of exchange-traded funds dedicated to China’s booming health care investment opportunity debuted earlier this year.
KraneShares, the issuer behind one of those China healthcare funds, took the emerging markets health care investment opportunity further with the debut of the KraneShares Emerging Markets Healthcare Index ETF NYSEKMED.

What Happened

New York-based KraneShares is known for its lineup of China-focused ETFs, but the firm also offers ETFs with more expansive reaches across the emerging markets space. KMED is the latest addition to firm’s broader emerging markets offerings.
The new ETF, which debuted Wednesday, tracks the Solactive Emerging Markets Healthcare Index. That benchmark “seeks to track the equity market performance of companies engaged in the health care sector in various emerging markets,” according to KraneShares. “The issuers include small-cap, mid-cap, and large-cap companies involved in hospital management, healthcare management, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and biotechnology, among other sub-industries.”

Why It’s Important

Data suggest the emerging markets health care investment opportunity is potentially massive.
“By 2040, emerging market countries on average are projected to increase healthcare spending as percent of GDP by 24.4% compared to just 9.8% in developed markets over the same time period,” according to KraneShares. “Healthcare expenses now comprise the largest segment of household consumption in China, which has the second largest healthcare market globally. At the same time, healthcare expenditure as a percent of GDP lags developed markets in both China and broad emerging markets, indicating there is significant room for growth in the sector.”
While KMED features exposure to multiple developing economies, it’s top-heavy at the geographic level as China, South Korea and combine for about 81 percent of the new ETF’s country exposures. Those are three of Asia’s four largest economies.

What’s Next

KMED isn’t the first health care ETF from KraneShares. The firm In January introduced the KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF KURE 0.86%, which now has $34.13 million in assets under management.
KMED charges 0.79 percent per year, or $79 on a $10,000 investment.

Youth soccer injury prevention program saves healthcare costs


An injury prevention program tailored to children’s soccer is not only more effective than typical warmups and stretches at keeping players safe, it’s also associated with lower healthcare costs, a Swiss study suggests.
Researchers studied soccer teams for kids under age 9 and under age 13 over a season in Switzerland. The teams were randomly chosen to do their usual warm-ups or to warm up with the “11+ Kids” injury prevention program, which includes 15 minutes of exercises focused on dynamic stability, power, core strength, and falling techniques.
Previously, the study team found the 11+ Kids program reduced the overall injury risk in children’s soccer by 48 percent and cut the risk of severe injuries by 74 percent, researchers report in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
The new analysis focused on the costs of the 11+ Kids program – including printed manuals and instructions for coaches – and the cost of treating injuries sustained by young soccer players during the season they tested the program.
Healthcare costs for every 1,000 hours of soccer exposure totaled 228.34 Swiss francs (US$235.74 at current exchange rates) for players who participated in the 11+ Kids program all season, compared with 469.00 francs ($484.20) for children who did only traditional warmups.
This translates into a savings of 240.66 francs ($248.46) for every 1,000 hours of soccer participation with the 11+ Kids program. Implementing the program nationwide would save 1.48 million francs ($1.53 million) a year, the researchers calculated.

“It is especially important to keep children injury free, as certain types of injuries clearly increase the risk for subsequent injury, potentially lead to drop out from sport, or even lead to long-term disability,” said lead study author Roland Rössler of the University of Basel in Switzerland.
“As such, the implementation of injury prevention from early age is highly (recommended),” Rössler said by email. “It is a win-win situation: The player (by reducing the risk of injury) as well as the society (by reducing health-care costs) could profit.”
A separate study in the same journal offers fresh evidence of the need for injury prevention in youth soccer. This study, done in Finland, examined overuse injuries in 733 soccer players ages 9 to 14.
During the 20-week study, researchers texted athletes’ parents weekly to find out about any injuries, then followed up by phone with players to determine whether these injuries might be due to overuse.
A total of 343 players, or 47 percent, had overuse injuries during the study.
Each week, about 13 percent of players had an overuse injury, and 6 percent had serious overuse injuries.
Knee injuries were the most common, and girls were almost three times more likely to report these injuries than boys, the study found.
For boys, the likelihood of heel injuries was almost triple the odds for girls.
Older players were also more apt to get overuse injuries than younger athletes.
While it’s no surprised that kids can get hurt on the field, the type of injuries might surprise some players and parents, said lead study author Dr. Mari Leppänen of the Tampere Research Center of Sports Medicine at the UKK Institute in Finland.
“There has been a belief that most of the injuries in youth soccer are acute injuries such as ankle sprains,” Leppänen said by email.
“This study showed that overuse problems in children’s soccer are more common than previously expected,” Leppänen added. “Although these conditions often require no medical treatment, these problems cause a long absence from sports, cause significant pain and discomfort, and may discourage child from participating in physical activity.”
More information about the 11+ Kids program is available here: bit.ly/2MZzZlS.
SOURCE: bit.ly/2MZAfBm and bit.ly/2MUG5nm British Journal of Sports Medicine, online August 14 and 21, 2018.