Search This Blog

Monday, June 10, 2019

Genentech: Positive Topline Results for Phase 2 Lupus Study

  • NOBILITY showed that Gazyva helped more patients achieve a complete renal response when added to standard of care
  • The Phase II study met both primary and key secondary endpoints
  • There are currently no FDA-approved therapies for lupus nephritis
Genentech, a member of the Roche Group (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY), today announced positive topline results for NOBILITY, a Phase II clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of Gazyva® (obinutuzumab) for adults with proliferative lupus nephritis. The study met its primary endpoint, showing Gazyva, in combination with standard of care (mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids), demonstrated enhanced efficacy compared to placebo plus standard of care alone in achieving complete renal response at one year. In addition, Gazyva met key secondary endpoints showing improved overall renal responses (complete and partial renal response) and serologic markers of disease activity as compared to placebo.
“There are no FDA-approved treatments for lupus nephritis, a potentially life-threatening condition in which patients are at high risk for progressing to end-stage renal disease or death,” said Sandra Horning, M.D., chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development. “We have been investigating a possible treatment for lupus nephritis for more than a decade and have integrated key learnings from that experience in how we study the condition. We are encouraged by the NOBILITY results, which showed a statistically significant difference in achievement of complete renal response, overall renal response, and other measures of disease activity and support the potential for a new treatment option for people living with lupus nephritis.”
Lupus nephritis is a severe and potentially life-threatening manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) resulting from inflammation of the kidneys, with proliferative lupus nephritis being the most severe form and associated with the highest risk of end-stage renal disease and death.1,2 In addition to meeting the primary endpoint, the study’s key secondary endpoint, defined as achievement of overall renal response (complete or partial renal response) at one year, was also met. No new safety signals were observed with Gazyva in the study at the time of this analysis. The full results from the study will be presented at a future medical meeting.

Presumed positive effect of cannabis consumption on opioid deaths not there

A just-published study has contradicted the findings of an early one that implied a connection between the availability of legal marijuana and opioid overdose deaths.
The earlier study, published in 2014 in JAMA Internal Medicine, showed that, between 1999 and 2010, states with medical cannabis laws had almost a 25% lower average rate of opioid overdose deaths compared to states without legal cannabis.
The new study, published today in PNAS, showed that the link reversed when the period was extended through 2017. The updated data showed that the rate of opioid overdose deaths was 23% higher in states with medical cannabis laws compared to states without.
Selected tickers: Tilray (TLRY +12.1%), Cronos Group (CRON +9.5%), Canopy Growth (CGC +3.6%), Aurora Cannabis (ACB +4%)
ETFs: MJSOILACTYOLO

ADA 2019 – a good start for Beta Bionics

The iLet system showed decent blood sugar control in its first trial, but the highly automated system is far from proven.
Data from the first human trial of Beta Bionics’ so-called bionic pancreas suggest that the device, which aims to be even more hands-off than other artificial pancreas-type systems, can improve blood sugar control compared with insulin injections or other insulin pumps.
The device worked well when used with glucose monitors from either Dexcom or Senseonics. But Medtronic’s status as the only company with a marketed artificial pancreas is safe for a little while yet: Beta Bionics intends to start a pivotal US trial of a newer version of the iLet next year.
The trial assessed the third-generation form of the iLet. The device’s USP is that patients only need to enter their weight and the machine calculates insulin doses from there, with no need to enter the other information, such as meal sizes and times, that is required by other closed-loop systems (Beta Bionics brings machine learning to insulin delivery, June 21, 2018).
The iLet system can administer insulin, glucagon or both to modulate blood sugar levels. In this trial, data from which were presented at the meeting of the American Diabetes Association on Saturday, the device was used to deliver insulin only.
Time in range
The trial enrolled 12 type 1 patients who usually treated their condition with multiple daily injections of insulin and 22 who used insulin pumps. It had a crossover design in which patients used their usual treatment method for seven days and iLet for seven days. 17 of the enrollees used Dexcom’s G5 continuous glucose monitor as the data input for the iLet, and the other 17 used the Eversense CGM from Senseonics.
Use of the iLet significantly increased the percentage of time patients had glucose levels in the target range of 70-180mg/dl compared with their usual care, and there was no statistically significant difference in time spent in hypoglycaemia between the two groups.
DATA FROM THE FIRST HUMAN TRIAL OF BETA BIONICS’ ILET
 iLetUsual careP
Time spent in target blood sugar range (70-180mg/dl)70.1%61.5%0.006
Time spent in hypoglycaemia (<54mg/dl)0.6%0.6%0.87
Mean blood sugar level155mg/dl162mg/dl0.097
Mean total daily dose of insulin44units/day42units/dayNot sig
Source: ADA abstract #77-OR; company communications.
The amount of time spent in hypoglycaemia when on the iLet was lower when it was used with Dexcom’s G5 glucose monitor than with Senseonics’ Eversense; however, the researchers noted that it is unclear whether this represents an actual difference in hypoglycaemia or a difference in the detection of hypoglycaemia between the two sensors.
According to the abstract, “several device issues” occurred, prompting Beta Bionics to make changes to the design of the fourth-generation iLet to improve safety and usability. It is this version that will enter pivotal studies.
Bihormonal
The ADA data add to results from a different study assessing the use of the iLet to deliver both insulin and glucagon which reported last week. This dual-hormone configuration is one of the key stages in the development of a more advanced artificial pancreas, since it enables more sensitive control of blood sugar levels than an insulin-only system.
Also a crossover trial, this study compared the iLet in its insulin-only configuration for one week versus the bihormonal configuration, using Zealand Pharma’s dasiglucagon, for one week in 10 adults with type 1 disease.
When delivering both hormones the system allowed a mean glucose level of 139mg/dl, versus 149mg/dl during the insulin-only period. During the bihormonal period, participants spent 79% of the time with their glucose level in range, vs 71% during the insulin-only period. Neither difference was statistically significant, however.
DATA FROM BIHORMONAL TRIAL OF BETA BIONICS’ ILET
Bihorminal iLetInsulin-only iLetP
Time spent in target blood sugar range (70-180mg/dl)79%71%<0.01
Time spent in hypoglycaemia (<54mg/dl)0.3%0.6%Not given
Mean blood sugar level139mg/dl149mg/dl<0.01
Source: company communications.
These results are encouraging, though of course both trials are small. The dual-hormone configuration is behind the insulin-only form, not least because dasiglucagon is not yet approved. If the pivotal trial of the fourth-gen insulin-only version succeeds, iLet could hit the market in 2021, though 2022 might be more likely. The bihormonal version could arrive a year or two after that.
Beta vs alpha
The device would go up against Medtronic’s MiniMed 670G, the only approved closed-loop system in which a blood glucose sensor is linked to an insulin pump. It might also go up against Medtronic’s next-generation version, the 780G.
The 780G is designed to automate the delivery of insulin boluses when the user experiences, or is predicted to experience, prolonged high blood sugar. The pivotal study will enrol 250-350 adults and children with type 1 diabetes and is expected to conclude in January.
Beta Bionics’ single-hormone system stands little chance of knocking Medtronic’s tech into second place on the market. Medtronic, though, does not have a means of delivering glucagon as well as insulin, so if and when Beta Bionics can bring its dual-hormone system to market it will have an advantage. But that interesting situation will take some years to come about, if indeed it ever does.

California Set to Offer Medicaid to Undocumented Young Adults

Undocumented young adults ages 19-25 can qualify for Medi-Cal (Medicaid) coverage in California if they meet the income requirements under a budget agreement reached yesterday by the Democratic leaders of the state legislature, according to the Associated Press .
The lawmakers are expected to pass the budget measure in the Democratic-controlled legislature this week, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to sign the bill.
The legislation is the first in the nation to provide public health insurance to undocumented adults. California, five other states, and the District of Columbia already cover unauthorized immigrant children.
Proposed by Newsom as part of his budget plan, the expansion of Medi-Cal coverage will take effect Jan. 1, 2020, and will cost $98 million in the upcoming fiscal year, according to the Sacramento Bee.
Two other proposals to cover undocumented residents were rejected because of their higher costs. One of the measures would have also covered poor undocumented seniors, according to the newspaper, and the other would have given all Californians with incomes under 138% of the federal poverty level access to Medi-Cal, regardless of immigration status.
The state will pay the extra amount to insure qualifying immigrants under Medi-Cal. The federal government cannot contribute funds to cover unauthorized immigrants under current law.

Individual Mandate

The pending legislation also imposes an individual mandate to buy health insurance for California residents. A similar mandate to purchase coverage is part of the Affordable Care Act, but the tax cut legislation passed by Congress in 2017 repealed the penalty for not buying insurance.
The revenue generated by the California mandate will help fund insurance subsidies for people who earn up to six times the federal poverty level (FPL), or $150,000 per year for a family of four. A family with that much income would be eligible for a state subsidy of $100 a month to buy health coverage, USA Todayreported.
Currently, under the Affordable Care Act, people between 100% and 400% of FPL receive federal government subsidies to buy insurance on a sliding scale.
Under the budget agreement, the Sacramento Bee said, $450 million will be added to the budget over 3 years to pay for middle class insurance subsidies, supplementing the funds expected to be raised by fines on people who don’t buy health insurance.
The Medi-Cal coverage of some undocumented immigrants and the expanded insurance subsidies are part of Newsom’s plan to achieve universal coverage for Californians. Of the 3 million state residents who are still uninsured, the majority are undocumented.
According to news reports, the budget bill targets 90,000 to 100,000 undocumented young adults. It is unclear how many more people might buy insurance with the help of the state subsidies or how many people might purchase coverage to avoid state financial penalties.

‘Like Watching a Car Crash in Slow Motion’: New RISE data

Contrasting findings of the Restoring Insulin Secretion(RISE) adult medication study with those of the same trial in adolescents illustrate just how dreadful the prognosis is for youth with type 2 diabetes, physicians heard here at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2019 Scientific Sessions.
Results of the adult RISE study, reported June 9, show that those with prediabetes or new-onset diabetes who received treatment had improvements in beta-cell function during the year of the study compared with those on placebo, but this did not produce any lasting benefit once treatment was stopped.
However, in RISE in adolescents — reported last year at the ADA Scientific Sessions — early treatment in teens with prediabetes or recent-onset type 2 diabetes for a year failed to prevent deterioration in beta-cell function.
“In adults, we see an improvement,” but, “there was no sustained improvement in beta-cell function in youth [representing] a troublesome set of data,” said RISE investigator Steven E. Kahn, MBChB, of VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, speaking at a press briefing.
“These youngsters have burned out their residual beta cells. There is very little to work with,” he observed. “Despite treatment, the kids were progressing. [Treatment] is not working. This is scary.”
Indeed fellow RISE investigator Kieren J. Mather, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, told Medscape Medical News that observing type 2 diabetes in youth is “like watching a car crash in slow motion.”
And that observation is borne out by the findings from the TODAY-2 study, discussed during the same press conference at ADA and reported yesterdayby Medscape Medical News.
In that trial, around 500 youths diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at an average age of 14 years were followed down the line (average age 25) and showed alarming consequences. This included a small number of deaths from diabetes-related causes among participants in their mid-20s and severe cardiovascular, renal, neurological, and ophthalmological events related to diabetes, including heart attacks, toe amputations, and renal dialysis, among other things. And not to mention the fact that pregnancy complications were exceptionally high, as was neonatal morbidity, among girls in the cohort who became pregnant and their offspring compared with background rates for the general population.
During a Q&A session following the presentation of the RISE data, when asked what could be done about youth with type 2 diabetes, Sonia Caprio, MD, a pediatric endocrinologist from Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, who is also a RISE investigator, said: “I am in clinic twice a week. The story is very sad. It’s a very big challenge.”
“The only two drugs we have for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in kids are not working. We need other approaches for treatment.”
And with regards to preventing type 2 diabetes from developing in the first place, she observed: “That’s a tough question, particularly for the kids. Early prevention of obesity, and obviously weight loss, but it’s a work in progress.”
Kahn said it is “imperative for us to better understand the disease process in youth in order to identify what makes their type 2 diabetes so aggressive so that we can improve long-term outcomes.”

Long-Term Treatment Required to Prevent Beta-Cell Function Loss in Adults

The RISE set of trials are complex studies in which beta-cell function is measured using hyperglycemic clamps. In the adult trial, which was simultaneously published in Diabetes Care this week, 267 individuals with prediabetes (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT]; n = 197; 74%) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n = 70; 26%) were studied.
Mather explained: “We wanted to intervene in those on the threshold between IGT and new diabetes.”
They were randomized to one of four treatment groups: 12 months of metformin alone; 3 months of insulin glargine followed by 9 months of metformin; 12 months of liraglutide (Victoza, Novo Nordisk) combined with metformin; or 12 months of placebo.
The primary outcome was beta-cell function at 15 months compared with baseline.
All three active treatment groups produced on-treatment reductions in weight and improvements in HbA1c compared with placebo; the greatest reductions were seen in the liraglutide plus metformin group.
However, despite on-treatment benefits, 3 months after therapy withdrawal there were no sustained improvements in beta-cell function in any group.
Mather said: “We expected some of the participants would have seen beneficial effects after treatment ended; however, that was not the case and suggests long-term management may be required to prevent loss of beta-cell function [in adults].”

Comparing and Contrasting Adults and Kids for the First Time

Kahn then spoke about the contrast in findings between RISE in adults and adolescents.
“What is unique about the RISE [set of trials] is that we did the same interventions [in adults and adolescents] so we can compare the findings.”
This “is the first time” there has been such a comparison, he emphasized.
In the adolescent trial, reported a year ago, 91 pubertal obese youth were randomized to either 12 months of metformin or 3 months of insulin glargine followed immediately by 9 months of metformin.
The kids had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 37.7 kg/m2 and an average HbA1c of 5.7%. Overall, 60% had prediabetes (IGT) and the remainder had type 2 diabetes of less than 6 months’ duration.
Liraglutide was not used in this trial, as it is not approved for use in children, and it was not felt to be ethical to have a placebo group, as some of the kids already had type 2 diabetes, Kahn noted.
As in the adults, the youth also had hyperglycemic clamps and oral glucose tolerance tests performed on separate days at baseline, 12 months, and 15 months.
As detailed in a separate simultaneous publication in Diabetes, “changes in beta-cell function were distinctly different,” between the adults and kids, Kahn explained.
“In youth, beta cells deteriorated despite the interventions given to them,” he noted, in contrast to the improvement during treatment in adults.
This “supports a more adverse trajectory of beta-cell deterioration in youth.”
The youths also required more insulin glargine from the outset than the adults, approximately double the amount, in fact, said Kahn — so that the average youth was on 70 units/day.

“A Much More Destructive Disease in Youth

“The difference in outcomes between the youth and adults is quite stark and highlights that type 2 diabetes in youth may have a different underlying pathology and, therefore, a different natural history,” Kahn emphasized.
“There is aggressive insulin resistance [in these kids] and beta-cell failure. This is a much more destructive disease in youth.”
Philip S. Zeitler, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics-endocrinology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, lead investigator of the TODAY studies, told reporters at the press conference that there are a number of possible explanations for the aggressive nature of type 2 diabetes in youth.
Firstly, “they appear to be hypersecreting relative to the degree of insulin sensitivity,” he explained. So it could be that “developing diabetes during puberty is just more deleterious.”
Alternatively, “the kids who develop diabetes under the stress of puberty are the weakest, being picked out by the environment. That’s why they get diabetes earlier.”
But even by Tanner stage 2, the earliest phase of puberty, some kids already show hypersecretion and insulin resistance, Zeitler explained.
Kahn said the reason why type 2 diabetes is more aggressive in youth remains to be determined. There is, he says, “an urgent need to better understand why these differences are occurring and to then develop new approaches to slow and even prevent progression of beta-cell dysfunction,” among youth.
“We’ve kept samples from RISE. By the time we get to the EASD [European Association for the Study of Diabetes] meeting [in Barcelona in September], we’ll have new data on this.”
Zeitler added that, in his opinion, “We can’t just focus on getting drugs approved. The data suggest something qualitatively different.”
Indeed, the holy grail, all the physicians agreed, is whether children at risk can be identified before they enter puberty and whether it’s possible to understand who makes the transition and why.
“It’s the obvious thing to consider: Can we prevent diabetes from developing?” Zeitler wondered.
RISE investigator Thomas A. Buchanan, MD, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, said this is no easy task.
“What we call diabetes is actually a continuum. As people progress, fasting plasma glucose doesn’t change much,” so glucose is probably the wrong marker, he explained.
“My opinion is that there is no practical way, clinically, to assess this other than, perhaps, slowly rising HbA1c.”

It Used to Be Rare to See Kids With Type 2 Diabetes

“It used to be rare to see pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes, but now there are almost as many kids with type 2 diabetes as type 1 [in our pediatric clinics],” Alvin Powers, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, who was moderator of the press conference during which both TODAY-2 and RISE were discussed, told journalists.
Another aspect of this problem is that this is disproportionately affecting some of the most vulnerable members of society, said the assembled physicians.
Less than 30% of the kids in RISE were white, and the investigators say that the curve for diabetes among white youths has remained relatively flat over the past 20 years, which is not the case for other ethnicities.
Black, Hispanic, and Native American kids in the United States, in particular, have had significant increases in incidence, so that, among Native American youth, for example, the rate of type 2 diabetes “has tripled” in the past two decades, Kahn emphasized.
It “highlights the epidemic we are facing in the United States and across the world. We clearly see the trajectory upwards. The outcomes are terrible. It’s a real problem. And this is an early reflection of what is going to be a [huge] problem in Asia and elsewhere.”
RISE was supported by grants from various US organizations, including the NIH, which are listed with the article. Additional funding was provided by the ADA, Allergan, Apollo Endosurgery, Abbott, and Novo Nordisk. Mather has reported receiving an investigator-initiated grant from Novo Nordisk during the conduct of this study. Kahn has reported serving as a paid consultant on advisory boards and has been a steering committee member for Novo Nordisk-sponsored clinical trials. Buchanan has reported receiving research support from Allergan and Apollo Endosurgery. 
Diabetes Care. Published online June 9, 2019. Abstract
Diabetes. Published online June 9, 2019. Abstract

FDA advisor panel tomorrow on utility of higher-dose opioids

The FDA’s Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee will jointly meet tomorrow and Wednesday, June 11 & 12, to seek public input on the clinical utility and safety concerns associated with higher range opioid analgesic dosing in the outpatient setting, including the best strategies for managing the risks while ensuring access to the medications for appropriate patients.
Selected tickers: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (NYSE:TEVA), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), Endo International (NASDAQ:ENDP), Dr. Reddy’s Labs (NYSE:RDY), Allergan (NYSE:AGN), Alkermes plc (NASDAQ:ALKS), Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:SAVA), Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NKTR), Opiant Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:OPNT), BioDelivery Sciences (NASDAQ:BDSI)

Varian expands interventional oncology footprint with two buys

Aimed at raising its profile in interventional oncology, Varian (NYSE:VAR) has acquired Austin, TX-based Endocare and Hangzhou, China-based Alicon for a total of $185M.
Endocare’s lead product is the Cyrocare CS Systems for cryotherapy for the minimally invasive treatment of a range of cancers.
Alicon’s top product is Caligel, calibrated resorbable gelform particles used an an embolic agent in China to treat liver cancer.
The two companies generated $30M in combined revenues in calendar 2018. The transaction will not have a material effect on fiscal 2019 results but will be accretive to GAAP and non-GAAP EPS in fiscal 2020.
Management will host a conference call tomorrow, June 11, at 8:30 am ET to discuss the deal.