Search This Blog

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Engineered T cells for type 1 diabetes move closer to clinic

For much of the last decade, Dr. David Rawlings, director of Seattle Children’s Research Institute’s Center for Immunity and Immunotherapies, has dreamed of developing a therapy for children with type 1 diabetes that doesn’t involve insulin injections but uses a person’s own immune cells to target and treat the disease.
Now, new research and a fresh infusion of funding bring this dream closer to reality, and nearer to opening a first-in-human clinical trial of an experimental therapy at Seattle Children’s in collaboration with research partner Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason (BRI).
“What started as a dream is now within reach,” Rawlings said. “My hope is that our research will lead to a new treatment that turns off the destructive immune response leading to development of type 1 diabetes in children.”
The immune system’s imbalance in diabetes
The research led by Rawlings, who is also the Division Chief of Immunology at Seattle Children’s and a professor of pediatrics and immunology at the University of Washington School of Medicine, along with co-investigator Dr. Jane Buckner, president of BRI, focuses on T cells, the immune system’s disease-fighting .
In type 1 diabetes, specific types of immune cells called effector T cells mistakenly attack insulin-producing islet cells in the pancreas. The job of these islet cells is to sense when are rising in the bloodstream and to respond by releasing insulin.
The attack continues because other components of the immune system, regulatory T cells (Treg), do not function normally.
“A healthy requires regulatory T cells to balance the attack of effector T cells,” Rawlings said. “Regulatory T cells tell the effector T cells to calm down and limits damage to tissues like the pancreas.”
Once destroyed by the unchecked effector T cells, the islet cells can’t release insulin. Glucose levels in the bloodstream then rise unabated, causing the early symptoms of diabetes such as frequent urination, unquenched thirst, insatiable hunger and extreme fatigue.
Novel engineered T cells offer a way to restore balance in the pancreas
To stop this attack, Rawlings’ lab devised a way to genetically engineer a patients own T cells, so they function like normal Treg. The hope is that when transferred back into the patient, these engineered or edited regulatory-like T cells (edTreg) enter the pancreas, where they can help to suppress the overactive immune response, sustaining and protecting the function of the islet cells.
A paper published in Science Translational Medicine shows how the research team used gene editing techniques to target the FOXP3 gene in human T cells. By turning on FOXP3, they equipped the T cells with the instructions needed to specialize into Treg.
The resulting edTreg looked very similar to natural Treg. They also functioned like natural Treg when tested in both animal models and tissue cultures. Finally, researchers demonstrated how they could make the engineered cells antigen-specific. According to Rawlings, this feature, which is accomplished by attaching a T-cell receptor to the surface of the engineered cell, will be critical to targeting the cells to the pancreas in a diabetic patient.
Further research to validate these results will help pave the way for a phase 1 clinical trial of a type 1 diabetes cell therapy.
“This data offers the first proof that engineering by way of turning on FOXP3 is sufficient to make a functional Treg-like cell product,” he said. “Not only is it a landmark research finding, but it’s directly translatable to clinical use.”
New funding continues promising research
Much of the research to develop the edTreg has been funded through a combination of industry sponsored agreements and generous philanthropic support from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.
Most recently, the Helmsley Charitable Trust awarded a new $4 million grant to Seattle Children’s and BRI to continue the diabetes research.
The grant builds on $3 million in prior funding from the Helmsley Charitable Trust and an ongoing research collaboration between the two research programs. In this next phase, the teams will work to fine tune the T-cell receptor used for the edTreg and enhance the manufacturing process used to generate the edTreg for .
“Our collaboration with BRI combines their broad expertise in finding and testing T-cell receptors from diabetic patients with our novel technology to engineer the T cells,” Rawlings said.
The best T-cell receptor will direct the edTreg to the pancreas and turn on their protective activity and, ideally, will also work for the greatest number of type 1 diabetes patients.
“We want to identify T-cell receptors that will create engineered Treg that will go to and protect the pancreas. This type of therapy could then be used to stop the destruction of that produce insulin in the pancreas to slow the progression and ultimately prevent type 1 diabetes,” said Buckner of BRI.
A dream within reach
Rawlings says the newly-funded studies will help them to establish the final cell product and key information required to establish a first-in-patient clinical trial.
He’s optimistic that the 3-year grant will give them the opportunity to complete the preclinical studies and study design required to submit an Investigational New Drug Application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the approval to open a phase 1 clinical trial at Seattle Children’s and BRI.
“This is a novel technology that no other lab in the world is pursuing and that has potential major advantages over Treg therapies being studied elsewhere,” Rawlings said. “I think some in the field questioned whether our approach would actually work, and so it’s gratifying to not only have proof that it works, but to continue to generate data showing just how remarkably well it works.”

Explore further
Immunotherapy, gene editing advances extend to Type 1 Diabetes

More information: Y. Honaker el al., “Gene editing to induce FOXP3 expression in human CD4+ T cells leads to a stable regulatory phenotype and function,” Science Translational Medicine (2020). stm.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/ … scitranslmed.aay6422

Amazon sued on warehouses as NY worker brings covid home, cousin dies

Amazon.com Inc has been sued for allegedly fostering the spread of the coronavirus by mandating unsafe working conditions, causing at least one employee to contract COVID-19, bring it home, and see her cousin die.
The complaint was filed on Wednesday in the federal court in Brooklyn, New York, by three employees of the JFK8 fulfillment center in Staten Island, and by family members.
One employee, Barbara Chandler, said she tested positive for COVID-19 in March and later saw several household members become sick, including a cousin who died on April 7.
The lawsuit said Amazon has made JFK8, which employs about 5,000, a “place of danger” by impeding efforts to stop the coronavirus spreading, boosting productivity at the expense of safety.
It said Amazon forces employees to work at “dizzying speeds, even if doing so prevents them from socially distancing, washing their hands, and sanitizing their work spaces.”
Amazon did not comment on the lawsuit, but said it has always followed guidance from health authorities and its workplace safety experts since the coronavirus pandemic began.

The Seattle-based company has benefited as the pandemic forced many consumers unable to visit physical stores to shop online more.
Unions, elected officials and some employees have faulted Amazon’s treatment of workers, including the firing of some critical of warehouse conditions.
Chief Executive Jeff Bezos said last week that Amazon has not fired people for such criticism.
Amazon is spending more than $800 million on coronavirus safety in this year’s first half, including cleaning, temperature checks and face masks.
At least 800 workers in U.S. distribution centers have tested positive for COVID-19, according to an employee’s unofficial tally.
Amazon ended 2019 with 798,000 full- and part-time employees.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction requiring that Amazon comply with worker safety and public nuisance laws, and not punish employees who develop COVID-19 symptoms or are quarantined.
The case is Palmer et al v Amazon.com Inc., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 20-02468.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-amazon-com-lawsuit/amazon-is-sued-over-warehouses-after-new-york-worker-brings-coronavirus-home-cousin-dies-idUSKBN23A3FI

Claims of a Weaker COVID-19 Virus Disputed

After Italy saw its first case of COVID-19 in late February 2020, the country quickly became a global hub for the virus. With over 233,000 cases and more than 33,000 deaths to date, the virus was more fatal in Italy than in China. To slow the spread, the government ordered everyone to stay home. Now, infection rates are finally falling.
And as the country begins to reopen, a handful of Italian doctors say the deadly virus is losing steam.
“In March and April, patients reached the emergency room very sick. They had acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure. They needed immediate oxygen, ventilation, and in two to three days, we had patients that died,” says Matteo Bassetti, MD, director of the Infectious Diseases Clinic at the San Martino Hospital in Genoa. “But now, in the past four to five weeks, it’s been totally different. Patients of a similar age as the ones before, even very elderly patients, are not as sick as patients were just four to six weeks before.”
In stark opposition to Bassetti’s and other doctors’ statements, Italian public health officials and the World Health Organization (WHO) warn there’s no evidence to support these claims. They urge health care providers and the public to continue to take the virus extremely seriously. Meanwhile, Bassetti says proof is on the way.

Can a Virus Weaken?

“One of the golden rules of virology,” says Mark Cameron, PhD, an associate professor of population and quantitative health sciences at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, “is that viruses that circulate in the community do change and mutate.”
They do this, he says, to survive. A virus that’s deadly enough to kill all of its hosts will die out as soon as the last infected person dies. A weaker form of the virus — one that doesn’t make people quite as sick — can continue to travel from person to person.
“A virus is interested in its own survival,” says Cameron. “It needs to maintain high viral fitness and not kill its host — us. COVID-19 has already struck that perfect balance.”
It could take generations for enough genetic change to take place to substantially weaken a coronavirus — both the one that causes COVID-19 and other forms that were around before it. Human coronaviruses are known to be extremely stable in their genetic makeup. They change very little over time. Early tracking of SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, suggests that it is behaving like its relatives, changing slowly and subtly over time.
That’s not to say that the virus isn’t changing at all. When researchers at Arizona State University analyzed coronavirus samples collected from nasal swabs, they found one individual sample that had a major genetic difference from other samples.
But it’s unknown whether this particular variation of the virus results in more or less severe illness or any difference in symptoms at all. To confirm a theory like that will require much more research. Scientists will need to align the various genetic sequences of numerous nasal swabs with patient symptoms.
Still, Cameron says, this single mutated sample won’t prevent other strains from continuing to spread and cause illness. Viral strains survive independently of each other. That’s why, for example, several flu strains circulate every season.
With so many people infected with SARS-CoV-2, a mutation in a single sample is unlikely to change the course of the outbreak, Cameron says.
Though researchers say it’s unlikely that the virus has mutated enough to make major differences in how severe an illness will be, that’s not all bad news. That makes the virus a stable target for researchers working on a vaccine. The flu, for example, changes so quickly that vaccine developers have to come up with a new shot every year.

Proof Is on the Way?

Public health officials stress there’s no scientific proof that the virus is now weaker. Until that proof is found, health authorities warn that the public cannot lower its defenses against the spread of the virus. But Bassetti promises the evidence is coming. He cites studies in progress in the northern Italian cities of Milan and Brescia that will show that people are carrying lower viral loads than before — a sign of less severe disease — and that genetic mutations in the virus have made it less deadly.
One of the golden rules of virology is that viruses that circulate in the community do change and mutate. Dr Mark Cameron
“We are not here to say that the virus is gone,” Bassetti says. “We are here to say that it is different.” He attributes these differences to a potential combination of things, including biological changes in the virus, and the success of the lockdown, social distancing, mask use, and hand-washing. Flattening the curve, Cameron adds, allows testing to catch up and makes medical care available to those who need it without delay.
In response to the WHO’s rebuttal of his claims, Bassetti says, “The WHO does not take care of patients. They are seated at a table in Geneva. These are the impressions of the majority of doctors on the ground. We have admitted more than 500 [COVID-19] patients at San Martino hospital since the beginning of the epidemic, and I have seen a dramatic reduction in the severity of the disease.”
It could be that the work of on-the-ground health care providers is responsible for this dramatic change, Cameron says.
“I would lay the credit for the consistently improving patient outcomes in Italy right at the doctors’ and health care workers’ feet,” he says. “It’s a testament to their heroics that they’ve broken this virus’s back without much, if any, help from the virus itself. We will have to wait for virus sequencing studies and clinical studies to resolve the issue.”
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/931670#vp_1

Humana medical group to open 20 primary care clinics in coming year

Humana-owned Partners in Primary Care is opening 20 primary care centers in the next year as it begins phase one of its three-year expansion plan, the medical group said June 2.
Half of the senior-focused primary care centers will be opened in two new markets: Las Vegas (eight) and the Shreveport-Bossier City, La., area (two). The remaining 10 centers will be in Houston, tripling Partners in Primary Care’s footprint there.
The additions come after Humana and private equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe entered into a joint venture agreement in February to expand Humana’s primary care centers.
Partners in Primary Care serves 35,000 patients from a variety of Medicare Advantage health plans, not just Humana. The company has 48 centers across Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Florida.
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/payer-issues/humana-medical-group-to-open-20-clinics-in-coming-year.html

Coronavirus Vaccine Race: Updates On The 10 Candidates In Clinics

The global economy is slowly emerging from lockdowns enacted to beat back the coronavirus.
The pandemic isn’t going anywhere, however, and hopes of a return to a semblance of normal rest heavily on the speedy development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Fast-Tracking Vaccine Programs

Vaccine development typically takes about 10-15 years, as it has to go through the same general pathway as that of drugs and biologics. With the advent of new classes of vaccines such as DNA and mRNA vaccines, development timelines could be tightened relative to traditional vaccines.
Pandemics in recent history such as the MERS and SARS, also caused by coronaviruses, set in motion several R&D programs that have come in handy in today’s scenario, as the new coronavirus shares 80% of its traits with its predecessors.
Public-private partnerships have been forged to expedite vaccine programs. In mid-April, the National Institutes of Health announced a co-operative framework involving several biopharma companies, the Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, the CDC, the FDA and the European Medicines Agency for expediting drug and vaccine research. Federal agencies have extended funding for companies with promising vaccine candidates in their pipeline, and this has given them the freedom to focus on research without having to worry about finances.
The U.S. government recently launched the “Operation Warp Speed” project, which has among its objectives ensuring the availability of substantial quantities of a safe and effective vaccine for Americans by January 2021.

US Government Backs 5 Vaccine Candidates

In order to narrow the focus on the most deserving vaccine candidates, the Trump administration has shortlisted five from a crowded field and will likely make an announcement in this regard in the next few weeks, the New York Times reported.
The shortlisted companies are, according to the Times:
Incidentally, Merck was a late entrant in the vaccine race, with the pharma giant announcing partnerships and deals to develop COVID-19 treatments and vaccines only recently.

10 Vaccine Candidates In Clinics, 123 More In Labs

A June 2 document from the World Health Organization showed that 10 vaccine candidates are in the clinics and 123 more are being evaluated in animal studies. Among the 10 vaccine candidates being tested in human studies, five are developed by Chinese firms or institutions. Here’s an update on the 10 vaccines in the clinics:

University Of Oxford/AstraZeneca

The vaccine developed by the University of Oxford in collaboration with AstraZeneca was codenamed ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, a weakened version of a common cold virus that causes infections in chimpanzees.
It has been genetically modified to make to prevent it from replicating in humans. After the university tied up with AstraZeneca, the vaccine candidate was renamed as AZD1222. AZD1222 is in a Phase 2/3 trial, with the university enrolling participants for the study in late May.
Results from an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial could be available in mid-June; a university official was quoted as saying mid-May. AstraZeneca has received over $1 billion in BARDA funding for the development, production and delivery of the vaccine starting this fall.
In late May, Adrian Hill, one of the lead investigators of the vaccine program, suggested the vaccine has only a 50% chance of succeeding, as the viral incidence receded in the community.

Moderna

Moderna, which is collaborating with NIAID for developing an mRNA vaccine, codenamed mRNA-1273, said recently it has dosed the first participant in a Phase 2 trial. The company also released interim data for its vaccine candidate from a NIAID-sponsored Phase 1 study, which showed dose-dependent increases in immunogenicity between prime and boost within the 25-microgram and 100-microgram dose levels. Moderna has prepped for scaling by forming an alliance with Swiss CDMO Lonza.
See also: Inovio Analyst Watches Coronavirus Play ‘From The Sidelines’

CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute of Biotechnology

CanSino, which was the first to begin vaccine testing, announced last week the publication of Phase 1 data of its vaccine candidate Ad5 that showed most people developed immune responses.
Yet he number of people developing neutralizing antibodies — the ones that count for preventing infection — was 75% among those who received the high dose and 50% among those who received the medium or low dose.
A Phase 2 study of Ad5 was started in April and is underway. Ad5 is a genetically engineered adenovirus that delivers the gene encoding the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 into human cells.

Wuhan Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm

The combo’s vaccine candidate entered Phase 2 trials April 24, according to Xinhua.
The Phase 1 trial is ongoing, the report said at that time. Sinopharm, one of the partners, seemed to suggest it will take one year of evaluation to determine the efficacy and safety of the inactivated vaccine candidate.

Sinovac

Sinovac, which began working on an inactivated vaccine candidate in January, said recently it is 99% confident in its vaccine candidate, codenamed CoronaVac. The candidate is in a Phase 1/2 trial. The company recently received $15 million in funding from private investors in lieu of a stake in the company.

Novavax

Novavax, Inc. NVAX 10.86% identified its vaccine candidate, codenamed NVX-CoV2373, in early April. The vaccine candidate is a stable prefusion protein made using the company’s proprietary nanoparticle technology, with Matrix-M adjuvant incorporated to enhance the immunity response of the vaccine.
The company said May 25 it enrolled the first participant in the Phase 1 portion of a Phase 1/2 study it has initiated, with results from the Phase 1 portion expected in July. In mid-May, the company announced an award of an incremental $384 million in funding by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. On Wednesday, AGC Biologics said it has been tasked with manufacturing Matrix-M adjuvant by Novavax.

Beijing Institute Of Biological Products/Sinopharm

State-affiliated Beijing Institute of Biological Products, which is developing an inactivated vaccine in a Phase 1/2 trial, has started the Phase 2 trial, a post on the WeChat account of the Chinese state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission said.

Pfizer/BioNTech

Pfizer is collaborating with German biopharma BioNTech SE – ADR BNTX 2.33% for vaccine development. BioNTech is evaluating four vaccine candidates in its BNT162 program. These are mRNA vaccines combined with a lipid nanoparticle formulation. BNT162 is being tested in separate Phase 1/2 trials in Europe and the U.S. Pfizer will be vested with the responsibility of scaling up at risk.

Institute Of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy Of Medical Sciences

In mid-May, the institute received approval for commencing a Phase 1 study.

Inovio

Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc INO 13.32%, which is developing a DNA vaccine codenamed INO-4800, said in its May 11 earnings release it has completed enrollment in a Phase 1 study.
It anticipates commencing a Phase 2/3 efficacy trial in summer, subject to regulatory approval. Inovio has received funding from the CEPI as well as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Among others, J&J, which has identified a lead vaccine candidate, plans a clinical study by September. The company expects the first batches of a vaccine to be available for emergency use authorization by early 2021.
Several other companies are also in the fray, including Sorrento Therapeutics Inc SRNE 13.21%, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc REGN 2.17% and Sanofi SA SNY
https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/20/06/16174248/revisiting-the-coronavirus-vaccine-race-updates-on-the-10-candidates-in-clinics

UK doctors to trial ibuprofen in COVID-19 patients with breathing difficulties



British doctors are trialling a formulation of anti-inflammatory ibuprofen to see if it reduces respiratory failure in patients with severe symptoms of COVID-19.
The trial involves a particular formulation of ibuprofen, which researchers said had been shown to be more effective than standard ibuprofen for treating severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a complication of COVID-19.
The formulation is already licensed for use in Britain for other conditions.
“If successful, the global public health value of this trial result would be immense given the low cost and availability of this medicine,” said Matthew Hotopf, director of NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre.
The trial, known as “LIBERATE”, will be a randomised study, with recruitment of up to 230 patients expected over the coming months.
It is being run by Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in London, King’s College London (KCL) and pharmaceutical organisation the SEEK Group.

In March, France’s health minister said people should not use anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen if they have symptoms of COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus.
However, U.S., British and European Union drug regulators as well as Reckitt Benckiser (RB.L), which makes Nurofen, have all said there is no evidence that ibuprofen makes COVID-19 worse.
Mitul Mehta, director of KCL’s Centre for Innovative Therapeutics, said that possible well-known gastric side effects from ibuprofen meant that paracetamol was better to relieve COVID-19 symptoms in its early stages.

But he added there was no evidence to back up the French claims that ibuprofen worsens COVID-19 symptoms, saying the formulation being used in the trial should lessen the possible side effects.
“There’s no way these early reports would’ve been talking about this different formulation,” Mehta told Reuters.
“The trial is the right forum in which to test the side effects and to test the efficacy.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-ibuprofen/uk-doctors-to-trial-ibuprofen-in-covid-19-patients-with-breathing-difficulties-idUSKBN23A1DV

Sanofi to run consultations over restart of hydroxychloroquine trials

Sanofi said on Wednesday it would review available information and run consultations before deciding whether to enroll patients again for its COVID-19-related hydroxychloroquine trials.
The French drugmaker said on May 29 it had stopped recruiting new COVID-19 subjects for two clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine until concerns about safety are cleared up following a decision by the World Health Organization to pause a large trial.
The WHO said earlier in the day the trial would resume.
“We will review available information and run consultations in the coming days to reassess our position,” a spokesman with Sanofi said.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-sanofi-hydroxychlr/sanofi-to-run-consultations-over-restart-of-hydroxychloroquine-trials-idUSKBN23A2RU