Search This Blog

Friday, November 13, 2020

Andrew Cuomo, Vaccine-Resistant

New York governor Andrew Cuomo has done it again. Following his earlier pledge to delay distribution of a prospective, FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine in New York State until his own committee reviewed it, Cuomo has now labelled pharma giant Pfizer’s announcement that its new vaccine is showing 90 percent effectiveness and could be available soon “bad news.”

Yes, you read that correctly. Cuomo told George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America that he will no longer confine his efforts to limiting vaccine access to New York State—he has been “talking to other governors across the nation” to stop vaccine distribution by the Trump administration until the Biden administration comes in.

Cuomo’s rationale is that Trump’s plan would rely on private-market mechanisms like hospitals and pharmacies to distribute the vaccine—the same places people routinely go to fulfill their health-care needs, including flu shots. Cuomo claims that will “leave out all sorts of communities that were left out the first time when COVID ravaged them.” These communities, he says, live in “health care deserts” where there is no Rite-Aid or CVS. “That’s what happened the first time with COVID.”

African-Americans have had higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death from Covid-19 for many reasons, but lack of access to a local pharmacy is not one of them. Pharmacies are relatively common in urban areas and, in any event, they had no magic bullet in stock that would have alleviated the illness. Actual explanations for the disease’s disproportionate impact on blacks include higher rates of comorbidities that predispose them to severe Covid-19 illness; more prevalent employment exposure among blacks, who are only two-thirds as likely as white workers to be able to work from home; disproportionate concentrations of African-American populations in urban areas that the illness has hit hard so far; and perhaps other biological factors that make blacks more susceptible to coronavirus infection.

What actually happened “the first time” with Covid is that Governor Cuomo worsened New York’s death toll by forbidding nursing homes—where many elderly and sick people, the most vulnerable to Covid-19, live—from testing new admittees for active viral infections and from refusing to admit residents “based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of Covid-19.” The governor also delayed New York City mayor Bill de Blasio’s school-closing and shelter-in-place orders to score political points by demonstrating who’s boss in New York.

When asked how presumptive President-Elect Joe Biden could do better, Cuomo claimed that “there was no mobilization of the government” under Trump and reiterated that private mechanisms would miss some communities. In fact, the Trump administration’s plan calls for the purchase and cost-free provision of vaccines by the federal government and centralized distribution to state, tribal, and local health authorities that the CDC has worked with for decades, as well as to commercial partners. Missing from Cuomo’s answer was any discussion of what a Biden plan might entail or how it would differ from Trump’s.

Cuomo notwithstanding, most Americans hope that Pfizer and other companies will soon have safe and effective vaccines approved by the FDA. Delaying their distribution and use will needlessly prolong economic and social upheaval and result in thousands of avoidable deaths, many in the same communities for which Governor Cuomo professes concern. That would be a steep price to pay for the sake of partisanship and the satisfaction of one man’s continued desire to demonize Donald Trump.

Indonesia to start mass COVID-19 vaccination this year - President

Indonesia has sought emergency authorisation to start a mass vaccination campaign by the end of the year to combat the coronavirus in the archipelago, the Southeast Asian nation’s president said on Friday.

President Joko Widodo, commonly known as Jokowi, said plans were already advanced to distribute the vaccine across the entire country.

If approval is granted by the country’s food and drug agency, known by its Indonesian acronym BPOM, it will mean Indonesia - with 270 million people, the world’s fourth most populous country - will be among the first in the world to roll out a coronavirus vaccine.

“We expect to start the vaccination process by the end of this year following a series of tests by BPOM,” Jokowi said.

Indonesia has struggled to suppress the coronavirus for months but the steady rise in infection rates has plateaued in the past few weeks, according to official figures.

The country has Southeast Asia’s largest coronavirus caseload with about 15,000 deaths and 450,000 infections although health experts warn those numbers are likely to be higher due to low testing rates.

“We will put pressure on the cases so they can stay flat and then we will hit it with the vaccines,” Jokowi told Reuters at the presidential palace.

On Friday afternoon, after Reuters’ interview with Jokowi, Indonesia posted a record daily number of infections at 5,444, well above the daily average of fewer than 3,500 cases over the past two weeks.

Jokowi added that ensuring the safety of the vaccine was a priority, and that health workers, police and the military would be first in line when the vaccination campaign begins.

At a ministerial roundtable after the Jokowi interview, Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs and Investment Luhut Pandjaitan said the government expects BPOM approval in the first week of December and for Indonesia to “begin vaccinating” two weeks later.

Vaccines produced by China's Sinovac SVA.O and Sinopharm are slated to be used in the early stages of the campaign. This year, the companies will provide 18 million vaccines, including 15 million that will be manufactured by Indonesia's state-owned pharmaceutical company Bio Farma.

All up, Indonesia has deals for more than 250 million doses until the end of 2021. This includes 30 million produced by the U.S. company Novavax NVAX.O, co-ordinating minister for the economy, Airlangga Hartarto told Reuters.

ECONOMIC BOOST

Over the past two quarters, Indonesia’s economy has contracted at a slower pace than other countries in the region and Jokowi said the economic trend was “encouraging”.

“Hopefully, this (vaccination campaign) will give a positive economic impact. This is very important to us.”

He said the passage of a huge job creation bill that streamlined 79 existing laws to boost investment, spur business activity and drive employment was a “major structural reform” that would further add impetus to the economy.

Implementation of the reforms package, known as the Omnibus law, would be completed by the end of the year, Jokowi said.

When the bill was passed, there were widespread protests from workers, students and environmentalists and several trade unions have challenged the law in the Constitutional Court.

Such activism is normal in a democracy, the president said, adding that he was not worried about judicial review petitions against the new law.

The protests have petered out in recent weeks, and Jokowi said the government has reached out to unions and large Islamic organisations to convince them of the benefits of the Omnibus laws.

“The government of Indonesia is strongly committed to carrying out structural reforms and accelerating the economic transformation ... by enacting the Job Creation law,” he said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-indonesia-presiden/exclusive-indonesia-to-start-mass-covid-19-vaccination-this-year-president-idUSKBN27T11H

Trump predicts covid vaccine will be widely available as soon as April

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he expects a coronavirus vaccine to be available for the entire population as soon as April, amid a crush of new infections of the deadly disease that has pushed daily case counts to record highs.

In his first public remarks in over a week following his election loss to Democratic challenger Joe Biden, Trump also said he expects an emergency use authorization for Pfizer's vaccine "extremely soon."

Pfizer has said it expects to report required safety data next week and can then apply for an emergency use authorization.

The remarks came after Trump received an update on 'Operation Warp Speed,' an administration effort to turbocharge development of a vaccine.

Criticism of the administration's response to the virus, which has killed over 235,000 Americans, became a rallying cry for Democrats ahead of Nov. 3 elections. U.S. networks have proclaimed Biden the winner of the presidential vote, but Trump, refusing to concede, has launched a series of legal challenges based on unsubstantiated claims of fraud.

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/Trump-predicts-coronavirus-vaccine-will-be-widely-available-as-soon-as-April--31778900/

'Breakthrough Finding' Reveals Why Certain COVID Patients Die

Dr. Megan Ranney has learned a lot about COVID-19 since she began treating patients with the disease in the emergency department in February.

But there's one question she still can't answer: What makes some patients so much sicker than others?

Advancing age and underlying medical problems explain only part of the phenomenon, said Ranney, who has seen patients of similar age, background and health status follow wildly different trajectories.

"Why does one 40-year-old get really sick and another one not even need to be admitted?" asked Ranney, an associate professor of emergency medicine at Brown University.

In some cases, provocative new research shows, some people — men in particular — succumb because their immune systems are hit by friendly fire. Researchers hope the finding will help them develop targeted therapies for these patients.

In an international study in Science, 10% of nearly 1,000 COVID patients who developed life-threatening pneumonia had antibodies that disable key immune system proteins called interferons. These antibodies — known as autoantibodies because they attack the body itself — were not found at all in 663 people with mild or asymptomatic COVID infections. Only four of 1,227 healthy individuals had the autoantibodies. The study, published on Oct. 23, was led by the COVID Human Genetic Effort, which includes 200 research centers in 40 countries.

"This is one of the most important things we've learned about the immune system since the start of the pandemic," said Dr. Eric Topol, executive vice president for research at Scripps Research in San Diego, who was not involved in the new study. "This is a breakthrough finding." (Topol is also editor-in-chief of Medscape.)

In a second Science study by the same team, authors found that an additional 3.5% of critically ill patients had mutations in genes that control the interferons involved in fighting viruses. Given that the body has 500 to 600 of these genes, it's possible researchers will find more mutations, said Qian Zhang, lead author of the second study.

Interferons serve as the body's first line of defense against infection, sounding the alarm and activating an army of virus-fighting genes, said virologist Angela Rasmussen, an associate research scientist at the Center of Infection and Immunity at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health.

"Interferons are like a fire alarm and a sprinkler system all in one," said Rasmussen, who wasn't involved in the new studies.

Lab studies show interferons are suppressed in some people with COVID-19, perhaps by the virus itself.

Interferons are particularly important for protecting the body against new viruses, such as the coronavirus, which the body has never encountered, said Zhang, a researcher at Rockefeller University's St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases.

When infected with the novel coronavirus, "your body should have alarms ringing everywhere," said Zhang. "If you don't get the alarm out, you could have viruses everywhere in large numbers."

Significantly, patients didn't make autoantibodies in response to the virus. Instead, they appeared to have had them before the pandemic even began, said Paul Bastard, the antibody study's lead author, also a researcher at Rockefeller University.

For reasons that researchers don't understand, the autoantibodies never caused a problem until patients were infected with COVID-19, Bastard said. Somehow, the novel coronavirus, or the immune response it triggered, appears to have set them in motion.

"Before COVID, their condition was silent," Bastard said. "Most of them hadn't gotten sick before."

Bastard said he now wonders whether autoantibodies against interferon also increase the risk from other viruses, such as influenza. Among patients in his study, "some of them had gotten flu in the past, and we're looking to see if the autoantibodies could have had an effect on flu."

Scientists have long known that viruses and the immune system compete in a sort of arms race, with viruses evolving ways to evade the immune system and even suppress its response, said Sabra Klein, a professor of molecular microbiology and immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Antibodies are usually the heroes of the immune system, defending the body against viruses and other threats. But sometimes, in a phenomenon known as autoimmune disease, the immune system appears confused and creates autoantibodies. This occurs in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, when antibodies attack the joints, and Type 1 diabetes, in which the immune system attacks insulin-producing cells in the pancreas.

Although doctors don't know the exact causes of autoimmune disease, they've observed that the conditions often occur after a viral infection. Autoimmune diseases are more common as people age.

In yet another unexpected finding, 94% of patients in the study with these autoantibodies were men. About 12.5% of men with life-threatening COVID pneumonia had autoantibodies against interferon, compared with 2.6% of women.

That was unexpected, given that autoimmune disease is far more common in women, Klein said.

"I've been studying sex differences in viral infections for 22 years, and I don't think anybody who studies autoantibodies thought this would be a risk factor for COVID-19," Klein said.

The study might help explain why men are more likely than women to become critically ill with COVID-19 and die, Klein said.

"You see significantly more men dying in their 30s, not just in their 80s," she said.

Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunobiology at the Yale School of Medicine, noted that several genes involved in the immune system's response to viruses are on the X chromosome.

Women have two copies of this chromosome — along with two copies of each gene. That gives women a backup in case one copy of a gene becomes defective, Iwasaki said.

Men, however, have only one copy of the X chromosome. So if there is a defect or harmful gene on the X chromosome, they have no other copy of that gene to correct the problem, Iwasaki said.

Bastard noted that one woman in the study who developed autoantibodies has a rare genetic condition in which she has only one X chromosome.

Scientists have struggled to explain why men have a higher risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19. When the disease first appeared in China, experts speculated that men suffered more from the virus because they are much more likely to smoke than Chinese women.

Researchers quickly noticed that men in Spain were also more likely to die of COVID-19, however, even though men and women there smoke at about the same rate, Klein said.

Experts have hypothesized that men might be put at higher risk by being less likely to wear masks in public than women and more likely to delay seeking medical care, Klein said.

But behavioral differences between men and women provide only part of the answer. Scientists say it's possible that the hormone estrogen may somehow protect women, while testosterone may put men at greater risk. Interestingly, recent studies have found that obesity poses a much greater risk to men with COVID-19 than to women, Klein said.

Yet women have their own form of suffering from COVID-19.

Studies show women are four times more likely to experience long-term COVID symptoms, lasting weeks or months, including fatigue, weakness and a kind of mental confusion known as "brain fog," Klein noted.

As women, "maybe we survive it and are less likely to die, but then we have all these long-term complications," she said.

After reading the studies, Klein said, she would like to learn whether patients who become severely ill from other viruses, such as influenza, also harbor genes or antibodies that disable interferon.

"There's no evidence for this in flu," Klein said. "But we haven't looked. Through COVID-19, we may have uncovered a very novel mechanism of disease, which we could find is present in a number of diseases."

To be sure, scientists say that the new study solves only part of the mystery of why patient outcomes can vary so greatly.

Researchers say it's possible that some patients are protected by past exposure to other coronaviruses. Patients who get very sick also may have inhaled higher doses of the virus, such as from repeated exposure to infected co-workers.

Although doctors have looked for links between disease outcomes and blood type, studies have produced conflicting results.

Screening patients for autoantibodies against interferons could help predict which patients are more likely to become very sick, said Bastard, who is also affiliated with the Necker Hospital for Sick Children in Paris. Testing takes about two days. Hospitals in Paris can now screen patients on request from a doctor, he said.

Although only 10% of patients with life-threatening COVID-19 have autoantibodies, "I think we should give the test to everyone who is admitted," Bastard said. Otherwise, "we wouldn't know who is at risk for a severe form of the disease."

Bastard said he hopes his findings will lead to new therapies that save lives. He notes that the body manufactures many types of interferons. Giving these patients a different type of interferon — one not disabled by their genes or autoantibodies — might help them fight off the virus.

In fact, a pilot study of 98 patients published Thursday in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine journal found benefits from an inhaled form of interferon. In the industry-funded British study, hospitalized COVID patients randomly assigned to receive interferon beta-1a were more than twice as likely as others to recover enough to resume their regular activities.

Researchers need to confirm these findings in a much larger study, said Dr. Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, a researcher at Imperial College London who was not involved in the study but wrote an accompanying editorial. Future studies should test patients' blood for genetic mutations and autoantibodies against interferon, to see if they respond differently than others.

Peiffer-Smadja notes that inhaled interferon may work better than an injected form of the drug because it's delivered directly to the lungs. While injected versions of interferon have been used for years to treat other diseases, the inhaled version is still experimental and not commercially available.

And doctors should be cautious about interferon for now, because a study led by the World Health Organization found no benefit to an injected form of the drug in COVID patients, Peiffer-Smadja said. In fact, there was a trend toward higher mortality rates in patients given interferon, although this finding could have been due to chance. Giving interferon later in the course of disease could encourage a destructive immune overreaction called a cytokine storm, in which the immune system does more damage than the virus.

Around the world, scientists have launched more than 100 clinical trials of interferons, according to clinicaltrials.gov, a database of research studies from the National Institutes of Health.

Until larger studies are completed, doctors say, Bastard's findings are unlikely to change how they treat COVID-19.

Dr. Lewis Kaplan, president of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, said he treats patients according to their symptoms, not their risk factors.

"If you are a little sick, you get treated with a little bit of care," Kaplan said. "You are really sick, you get a lot of care. But if a COVID patient comes in with hypertension, diabetes and obesity, we don't say, 'They have risk factors. Let's put them in the ICU.' "

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/940968