Search This Blog

Friday, December 4, 2020

UK Exempts Sports Stars, Actors, 'High-Value' Biz Travelers Returning To England From Quarantine

 Grant Shapps has revealed “high-value" business travellers are part of a new group of people who will not have to quarantine when they return to England after traveling to countries outside of coronavirus travel corridors.

The transport secretary said recently signed sports stars, performing arts professionals, TV production staff and journalists will also be exempt from the 14-day self-isolation period even if they have visited a destination where people are required to quarantine on return.

The move, which will come into force from 4am on Saturday, was recommended by the Government’s Global Travel Taskforce, which warned that business travel would be particularly slow to recover. 

Announcing the news on Twitter, Mr Shapps wrote: “New Business Traveller exemption: From 4am on Sat 5th Dec high-value business travellers will no longer need to self-isolate when returning to ENGLAND from a country NOT in a travel corridor, allowing more travel to support the economy and jobs. Conditions apply.

“From 4am on Sat 5th Dec certain performing arts professionals, TV production staff, journalists and recently signed elite sportspersons will also be exempt, subject to specific criteria being met.”

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/sports-stars-actors-and-highvalue-business-travellers-returning-to-england-will-no-longer-have-to-selfisolate

Metformin and risk of mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19

 


PDF: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2666-7568%2820%2930033-7

Summary

Background

Type 2 diabetes and obesity, as states of chronic inflammation, are risk factors for severe COVID-19. Metformin has cytokine-reducing and sex-specific immunomodulatory effects. Our aim was to identify whether metformin reduced COVID-19-related mortality and whether sex-specific interactions exist.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort analysis, we assessed de-identified claims data from UnitedHealth Group (UHG)'s Clinical Discovery Claims Database. Patient data were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older; had type 2 diabetes or obesity (defined based on claims); at least 6 months of continuous enrolment in 2019; and admission to hospital for COVID-19 confirmed by PCR, manual chart review by UHG, or reported from the hospital to UHG. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality from COVID-19. The independent variable of interest was home metformin use, defined as more than 90 days of claims during the year before admission to hospital. Covariates were comorbidities, medications, demographics, and state. Heterogeneity of effect was assessed by sex. For the Cox proportional hazards, censoring was done on the basis of claims made after admission to hospital up to June 7, 2020, with a best outcome approach. Propensity-matched mixed-effects logistic regression was done, stratified by metformin use.

Findings

6256 of the 15 380 individuals with pharmacy claims data from Jan 1 to June 7, 2020 were eligible for inclusion. 3302 (52·8%) of 6256 were women. Metformin use was not associated with significantly decreased mortality in the overall sample of men and women by either Cox proportional hazards stratified model (hazard ratio [HR] 0·887 [95% CI 0·782–1·008]) or propensity matching (odds ratio [OR] 0·912 [95% CI 0·777–1·071], p=0·15). Metformin was associated with decreased mortality in women by Cox proportional hazards (HR 0·785, 95% CI 0·650–0·951) and propensity matching (OR 0·759, 95% CI 0·601–0·960, p=0·021). There was no significant reduction in mortality among men (HR 0·957, 95% CI 0·82–1·14; p=0·689 by Cox proportional hazards).

Interpretation

Metformin was significantly associated with reduced mortality in women with obesity or type 2 diabetes who were admitted to hospital for COVID-19. Prospective studies are needed to understand mechanism and causality. If findings are reproducible, metformin could be widely distributed for prevention of COVID-19 mortality, because it is safe and inexpensive.

Funding

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Minnesota Learning Health System Mentored Training Program, M Health Fairview Institutional Funds; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; and National Cancer Institute.

Get Ready for False Side Effects

 By Derek Lowe 

We’re in the beginning of the vaccine endgame now: regulatory approval and actual distribution/rollout into the population. The data for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines continue to look good (here’s a new report on the longevity of immune response after the Moderna one), with the J&J and Novavax efforts still to report. The AZ/Oxford candidate is more of a puzzle, thanks to some very poor communication about their clinical work (which suffered from some fundamental problems itself).

Now we have to get people to take them. Surveys continue to show a good number of people who are (at the very least) in the “why don’t you take it first” category. I tend to think that as vaccine dosing becomes reality that more people will get in line for a shot, but that remains to be seen. I wanted to highlight something that we’ll all need to keep in mind, though.

Bob Wachter of UCSF had a very good thread on Twitter about vaccine rollouts the other day, and one of the good points he made was this one. We’re talking about treating very, very large populations, which means that you’re going to see the usual run of mortality and morbidity that you see across large samples. Specifically, if you take 10 million people and just wave your hand back and forth over their upper arms, in the next two months you would expect to see about 4,000 heart attacks. About 4,000 strokes. Over 9,000 new diagnoses of cancer. And about 14,000 of that ten million will die, out of usual all-causes mortality. No one would notice. That’s how many people die and get sick anyway.

But if you took those ten million people and gave them a new vaccine instead, there’s a real danger that those heart attacks, cancer diagnoses, and deaths will be attributed to the vaccine. I mean, if you reach a large enough population, you are literally going to have cases where someone gets the vaccine and drops dead the next day (just as they would have if they *didn’t* get the vaccine). It could prove difficult to convince that person’s friends and relatives of that lack of connection, though. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is one of the most powerful fallacies of human logic, and we’re not going to get rid of it any time soon. Especially when it comes to vaccines. The best we can do, I think, is to try to get the word out in advance. Let people know that such things are going to happen, because people get sick and die constantly in this world. The key will be whether they are getting sick or dying at a noticeably higher rate once they have been vaccinated.

No such safety signals have appeared for the first vaccines to roll out (Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech). In fact, we should be seeing the exact opposite effects on mortality and morbidity as more and more people get vaccinated. The excess-death figures so far in the coronavirus pandemic have been appalling (well over 300,000 in the US), and I certainly think mass vaccination is the most powerful method we have to knock that back down to normal.

That’s going to be harder to do, though, if we get screaming headlines about people falling over due to heart attacks after getting their vaccine shots. Be braced.

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/12/04/get-ready-for-false-side-effects

OTC 'Brain Boosters' May Pose Serious Risks

 Over-the-counter supplements advertised to improve memory and cognitive function may contain unapproved pharmaceutical drugs in potentially dangerous combinations and dosages, new research shows.

"Americans spend more than $600 million on over-the-counter smart pills every year, but we know very little about what is actually in these products," Pieter A. Cohen, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, told Medscape Medical News.

"Finding new combinations of drugs [that have] never been tested in humans in over-the-counter brain-boosting supplements is alarming," said Cohen.

The study was published online September 23 in Neurology Clinical Practice, a journal of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN).

Buyer Beware

In a search of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Dietary Supplement Label Database and the Natural Medicines Database, Cohen and colleagues identified 10 supplements labeled as containing omberacetam, aniracetam, phenylpiracetam, or oxiracetam — four analogs of piracetam that are not approved for human use in the US. Piracetam is also not approved in the US.

In these 10 products, five unapproved drugs were discovered — omberacetam and aniracetam along with three others (phenibut, vinpocetine and picamilon).

By consuming the recommended serving size of these products, consumers could be exposed to pharmaceutical-level dosages of drugs including a maximum of 40.6 mg omberacetam (typical pharmacologic dose 10 mg), 502 mg of aniracetam (typical pharmacologic dose 200-750 mg), 15.4 mg of phenibut (typical dose 250-500 mg), 4.3 mg of vinpocetine (typical dose 5-40 mg), and 90.1 mg of picamilon (typical  dose 50-200 mg), the study team reports.

Several drugs detected in these "smart" pills were not declared on the label, and several declared drugs were not detected in the products. For those products with drug quantities provided on the labels, three quarters of declared quantities were inaccurate.

Consumers who use these cognitive enhancers could be exposed to amounts of these unapproved drugs that are fourfold greater than pharmaceutical dosages and combinations never tested in humans, the study team says. One product combined three different unapproved drugs and another product contained four different drugs.

"We have previously shown that these products may contain individual foreign drugs, but in our new study we found complex combinations of foreign drugs, up to four different drugs in a single product," Cohen told Medscape Medical News.

The presence of these unapproved drugs in supplements, including at supratherapeutic dosages, suggests "serious risks to consumers and weaknesses in the regulatory framework under which supplements are permitted to be introduced in the US," Cohen and colleagues write.

"We should counsel our patients to avoid over-the-counter 'smart pills' until we can be assured as to the safety and efficacy of these products," said Cohen.

Concerning Findings

Reached for comment, Glen R. Finney, MD, fellow of the American Academy of Neurology, said two findings are very concerning: the lack of listed ingredients and especially the presence of unlisted drugs at active levels.

"What if a person has a sensitivity or allergy to one of the unlisted drugs? This is a safety issue and a consumer issue," Finney told Medscape Medical News.

Despite being widely promoted on television, "over-the-counter supplements are not regulated, so there is no guarantee that they contain what they claim, and there is very little evidence that they help memory and thinking even when they do have the ingredients they claim in the supplement," said Finney, who directs the memory and cognition program, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

"The best way to stay safe and help memory and thinking is to speak with your health providers about proven treatments that have good safety regulation, so you know what you’re getting, and what you’re getting from it," Finney advised.

The study had no targeted funding. Cohen has collaborated in research with NSF International, received compensation from UptoDate, and received research support from Consumers Union and PEW Charitable Trusts. Finney has no relevant disclosures.

Neurol Clin Pract. Published online September 23, 2020. Full text

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/938017

Silverback Therapeutics surges 38% after market debut

 

Pizer's Scaled-Down COVID-19 Vaccine Manufacturing Plan Is Old News: BofA

 Pfizer Inc. PFE 0.22%-BioNTech SE – ADR BNTX 0.52% is first among coronavirus vaccine developers to secure authorization for emergency use of candidate BNT162b2, with the first approval granted by U.K. regulators.

Scale-Down Previously Disclosed: An analyst at BofA Securities shrugged off a Thursday report in The Wall Street Journal that hinted at manufacturing constraints, resulting in a modest pullback in Pfizer shares.

The report said the company was forced to scale back its manufacturing plans for 2020 from 100 million doses initially to 50 million doses due to difficulties in scaling up the raw material supply chain.

The reduction was already communicated in the second week of November, BofA's Tazeen Ahmad said in a Friday note.

Pfizer and its German manufacturing partner BioNTech had reiterated to BofA their manufacturing goal of 50 million doses by the year-end and up to 1.3 billion doses by the end of 2021, the analyst said.

"While production is scaling up at an unprecedented pace, we remain confident in the partnership given PFE's expertise and valuable know-how in the vaccine space." 


What to Expect From Adcom Meeting: The FDA's Vaccines and Related Products Advisory Committee is set to meet between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. Dec. 10.

The committee will likely discuss the overall efficacy and safety profile; the age range of eligible subjects when approved; expectations to satisfy full approval; and the timing of when the placebo arm in the positive Phase 3 study will be notified and offered the vaccine, Ahmad said.

BofA estimates non risk-adjusted sales of $9.1 billion for BTN162b2 in 2021.

Upcoming Pfizer Catalysts: The FDA's goal is granting emergency use authorization one week after the Dec. 10 Adcom meeting, the analyst said. 

The European Medicines Agency's Committee For Medicinal Products for Human Use is expected to conclude its assessment during a Dec. 29 meeting at the latest, according to BofA. 

EU approval could be forthcoming if the data submitted is robust enough to reach conclusions on the safetyand efficacy standards set forth by the EMA, the sell-side firm said. 

https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/20/12/18653755/pfizers-scaled-down-covid-19-vaccine-manufacturing-plan-is-old-news-bofa

PureTech begins trial of potential ‘Long COVID’ drug as cases mount

 As the pandemic drags on there are increasing concerns about “Long COVID” – where symptoms persist long after the initial infection has been fought off.

PureTech has joined the effort to find ways to treat the scarring and inflammation that are thought to cause the ongoing symptoms such as shortness of breath and fatigue.

After promising results in an early stage study, the company has begun a phase 2 trial of its LYT-100 (deupirfenidone) in Long COVID respiratory complications and related sequela.

LYT-100 is wholly owned by PureTech, which is already being developed for conditions involving inflammation and fibrosis and disorders of lymphatic flow.

The rationale for treating inflammation and scarring comes from a growing body of evidence from patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection and previous experience with the closely related Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus.

PureTech referred to an Italian study showing that more than 40% of COVID-19 survivors reported shortness of breath an average of 60 days following symptom onset.

LYT-100 is based on the already-approved small molecule drug pirfenidone but with the addition of deuterium its half-life has been extended to improve tolerability, allow for less frequent dosing, and potentially increase its efficacy.

It is treated as a new chemical entity and as such fresh trials are needed to establish whether it is safe and effective.

The primary endpoint of the trial will be the six-minute walk test distance.

Secondary endpoints will include pharmacokinetics, inflammatory biomarkers, imaging and patient-reported outcomes and shortness of breath.

The study is to begin in the US and Europe and results are expected in the second half of next year.

PureTech also plans a phase 2a proof-of-concept study testing LYT-100 in patients with breast cancer-related upper limb secondary lymphedema this quarter.

The company is also planning studies to test LYT-100 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/puretech-begins-trial-of-potential-long-covid-drug-as-cases-mount/