Search This Blog

Sunday, January 3, 2021

Brazil, under mounting pressure, eyes emergency use for AstraZeneca vax

 Brazil will soon weigh emergency-use approval for AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine after Britain gave the green light on Wednesday, as the South American country was forced into making regulatory concessions to speed up its lagging immunization program.

Britain on Wednesday became the first country in the world to give full regulatory approval to the coronavirus vaccine developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca.

The U.K. approval offers hope to Brazil, which has made the cheap and sturdy British vaccine a cornerstone of its widely criticized vaccine plan.

But it also highlights the problems Latin America's biggest country has had in procuring and utilizing vaccines that will be crucial to ending the world's second-most deadly coronavirus outbreak.

President Jair Bolsonaro, a prominent coronavirus skeptic who has said he will not take any COVID-19 vaccine, is under growing pressure to speed up Brazil's rollout, as regional peers Mexico, Chile and Argentina have already begun immunizations.

On Wednesday, AstraZeneca said Argentina's regulator approved its vaccine for emergency use there. Brazil's government has given a best-case-scenario date of Jan. 20 for AstraZeneca vaccinations to begin.

Brazil's health regulator Anvisa met with AstraZeneca Plc representatives in the morning and said the company's local partners, federally-funded biomedical institute Fiocruz, will file for emergency use authorization, without saying when.

It also said that it had agreed to tweak certain emergency use application requirements that Pfizer Inc had complained were overly onerous.

The federal government's dispute with Pfizer, whose vaccine is already being used in Britain and the United States, led critics to decry needless bureaucratic hurdles just as the virus roars back to life. Brazil recorded 1,194 deaths from COVID-19 on Wednesday, the highest number for one day since Sept. 1.

In theory, Brazil's emergency use authorization allows for fast-track usage of a COVID-19 vaccine among certain high-risk patients. It is a slimmed down version of a full regulatory approval for nationwide rollout.

However, Pfizer's complaints about the process had forced the government onto the defensive on Tuesday, saying it was hamstrung by local laws that only allow it to sign purchase agreements once producers have emergency use authorizations or full authorizations.

However, the government also pledged to improve dialogue with Pfizer.

Its new stance appears to be bearing fruit.

On Wednesday, Pfizer said Anvisa had suggested it could tweak certain requirements to help expedite emergency use approval. Anvisa, in a statement, confirmed its willingness to modify certain requirements.

Pfizer said it would consider whether to apply for emergency use, adding that it continues to regularly submit trial data to Anvisa as part of the full authorization process.

TARGETING JANUARY

Rio de Janeiro-based Fiocruz, which has agreed to import and bottle some 100 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine by June and eventually produce the vaccine locally, had previously said it would seek full regulatory approval for the shot on Jan. 15.

On that basis, officials have said nationwide vaccinations could, at the earliest, begin on Jan. 20.

Anvisa's press representatives declined to say when Fiocruz would file its request for emergency use.

Once submitted, Anvisa said it will take up to 10 days to review the application, adding that the ongoing submission of late-stage trial results would help to accelerate the process.

AstraZeneca and Fiocruz did not immediately answer questions on plans and timing for seeking regulatory approval.

Earlier in the day, AstraZeneca said it was working to offer its COVID-19 vaccine to Brazilians as soon as possible, but made no mention of seeking emergency use approval.

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/Brazil-under-mounting-pressure-eyes-emergency-use-for-AstraZeneca-vaccine--32102350/

Lonza gets Swiss OK to start Moderna vaccine production

 Swiss regulators have allowed contract manufacturer Lonza Group to start producing Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine at a plant in Switzerland, the SonntagsZeitung newspaper reported.

“Important preparatory work is under way at the moment with the view to ramp up the production lines,” it quoted a spokesman for Lonza’s plant in Visp as saying.

Large-scale output could begin within days so that vaccine deliveries could start as soon as it wins approval in Europe, the newspaper added.

Drugs regulator Swissmedic, which has already approved a COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer and partner BioNTech, is expected to approve the Moderna version soon, officials have said.

The United States authorised Moderna’s vaccine on Dec. 19, Canada did so on Dec. 23 and the EU’s watchdog is expected to approve it this week.

Lonza, which in May announced a deal to make vaccine doses for Moderna, is already manufacturing it at a U.S. plant. Moderna has its own production capacity as well.

The Swiss plant has the capacity to produce 800,000 doses a day, the newspaper said, which will then be sent to a company in Spain that readies individual doses for delivery.

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-swiss/lonza-gets-swiss-ok-to-start-moderna-vaccine-production-paper-idUSKBN29808X

India's approval of homegrown vaccine criticised over lack of data

  India on Sunday granted emergency approval to Bharat Biotech’s COVAXIN but faced questions after taking the step without publishing efficacy data for the homegrown coronavirus vaccine.

The news, announced by the drugs controller general of India (DCGI) who did not take questions, was hailed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his ministers as a success in India’s self-reliance push.

The government also approved the use of a vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University which will be the lead vaccine in India’s immunisation programme until other shots are approved.

COVAXIN was jointly developed with a government institute and means India joins a small list of countries to have approved its own coronavirus shot.

Bharat has partnered with drug developer Ocugen Inc to co-develop it for the U.S. market, and Brazil has signed non-binding letters of intent to buy the shot.

The company has said it is in discussions with more than 10 countries about COVAXIN.

“While this vaccine addresses an unmet medical need during this pandemic, our goal is to provide global access to populations that need it the most,” Bharat Biotech Chairman Krishna Ella said in a statement.

“COVAXIN has generated excellent safety data with robust immune responses to multiple viral proteins that persist.”

Neither the company nor India’s Central Drugs Standards Control Organisation would reveal its efficacy results. A source with knowledge of the matter told Reuters its effectiveness could be more than 60% with two doses.

China also did not publish detailed efficacy data for a vaccine it authorised on Thursday but its developer has shared interim data.

“On what basis was this approval given when Bharat Biotech has NOT shown enough data proving safety & efficacy?” transparency activist Saket Gokhale asked on Twitter.

Gokhale has filed a request under India’s right-to-information law asking the government for safety and other data for the two vaccines approved on Sunday.

COVAXIN has been fast-tracked like no other vaccine in India. The company said in November it was likely to be launched in the second quarter of 2021, while a government scientist had suggested it might be February or March.

Opposition lawmakers and former ministers on Sunday questioned the lack of transparency in approving it.

“Approval was premature and could be dangerous,” said opposition lawmaker and former minister Shashi Tharoor, asking Health Minister Harsh Vardhan for an explanation.

“Its use should be avoided till full trials are over. India can start with the AstraZeneca vaccine in the meantime.”

Vardhan urged Indians to trust that “stringent protocols” had been followed to ensure the safety and efficacy of the two approved vaccines.

In the largest such trial in India, Bharat Biotech said it had recruited 23,000 volunteers out of a target of 26,000 for an ongoing Phase III trial of COVAXIN which began in November.

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-india-covaxin/indias-approval-of-homegrown-vaccine-criticised-over-lack-of-data-idUSKBN2980BN

More drugs see price hikes yet at a lower rate than last year

 

  • As details on the newly implemented drug price hike pour in, the analysts point to a higher number of drugs becoming more expensive this year, yet at a less sharp rate than the last year.
  • The Wall Street Journal reports an average price hike of 3.3% from about 70 drug manufacturers in the new year, citing the data from software maker from Rx Savings Solutions. In comparison, 50% fewer products from more than 60 companies saw an average increase of 5.8% in prices in 2020.
  • Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) and Sanofi (NASDAQ:SNY) have led the pack to raise the prices by 5% or less, with the former including over 200 products in the list, compared to more than a dozen drugs selected by the latter.
  • Noting that the hike was necessary to fund research, a spokeswoman from the leading COVID-19 vaccine maker said that the adjustment at 1.3% for all products in the portfolio was in line with inflation. Meanwhile, a spokesperson from Sanofi has stated that none of its price increases will exceed the expected growth of U.S. healthcare spending at 5.1%.
  • According to the analysis, with a price increase of 31% for its hypertension therapy, Dutoprol, ADVANZ PHARMA (OTCPK:CXRXF) has affected the sharpest price increase. The generics drugmaker, Teva Pharmaceutical (NYSE:TEVA), and Canada-based Bausch Health (NYSE:BHC) have joined in with a price hike for about 15 and 40 drugs in their portfolios, respectively.
  • GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) has introduced an average price increase of 2.6% across the portfolio, according to a company spokesperson. Based on data from Rx Savings Solutions, GSK’s shingles vaccine Shingrix and meningitis vaccine Bexsero have each seen a price hike of 7%. Citing the data from healthcare research firm 3 Axis Advisors, Reuters reports a price increase of 8.6% for its diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine, Pediarix.
  • https://seekingalpha.com/news/3648194-drugs-see-price-hikes-yet-lower-rate-last-year

Saturday, January 2, 2021

New and Emerging Drug Classes That Will Outlast the Pandemic

 There have been many new therapeutics and prophylactics developed over the chaotic 2020 campaign to defeat COVID-19, and many of them will outlast the pandemic and be applied to a range of other illnesses. Others are being developed in light of the fact that the world, and other diseases, have continued on in spite of it.

From synthetic polymer-based anti-infectives to antiviral conjugates and DNA vaccines, the past year has given new and emerging drug classes an opportunity to shine.

Are AVCs the Future of Virus Prevention and Treatment?

In SeptemberBioSpace spoke with Jeff Stein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cidara TherapeuticsThe San Diego-based biotech is developing long-acting therapeutics designed to improve the standard of care for patients with serious fungal and viral infections using its proprietary Cloudbreak® antiviral platform

At that time, we learned about CD377, an antiviral conjugate (AVC) with the potential to provide near-immediate efficacy and universal long-term protection against all influenza strains. Since then, another small molecule, CD388, has been added to the Cidara family.

CD388, which provides protection up to 6 months of protection, as opposed to the 4 months offered by its predecessor, is neither a vaccine, nor a monoclonal antibody, and has the capacity to serve as a fast-acting influenza therapeutic accessible to the general public. Alongside CD388 and CD377, Cidara is developing similar compounds targeting HIV and RSV (Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus), and coronaviruses. 

“Even if you have SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages, [AVCs] can work like a monoclonal antibody. However, unlike monoclonal antibodies, you don’t have to administer 8 grams. These are so potent, it’s just a very small administration,” explained Stein. “So, for example, the Regeneron monoclonal that President Trump got, that 8-gram dose, that is not commercially viable. Whereas in the case of our AVCs, they’re so exquisitely potent and long-lived, that they can work as a fast-acting therapeutic, as well as a long-acting preventative.”

The technology behind these AVCs, inspired by oncology bispecific immunotherapy, could be significant in preventing future “twindemics” like the one we’re currently facing with COVID-19 and the flu. This is particularly true as new strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus emerge, such as the one that began in the U.Kand has since migrated to America.  

“They [AVCs] are designed to hit all the strains of coronavirus, including the strain that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2. So, imagine if those attributes carry over to that program where a single injection once every 4-6 months provides not only protection like a vaccine, but importantly, protection in the vulnerable population who have a debilitated immune system, those people that typically don’t respond well to vaccines. In the US, that represents about 100 million people,” said Stein. 

He added that the improvements his team has made to the original have considerable potential for other indications – including future coronaviruses:

“Importantly, the improvements that we made to extend that half-life, it appears they also apply to the other platform molecules that we’re developing outside of influenza. So, the same prolonged half-life appears to work in our HIV molecules, in our RSV molecules, and importantly in our coronavirus program.”

Stein shared that Cidara is aiming to file IND by the end of 2021 for CD388.

“Going into the new year, I hope we have an opportunity to announce an important partnership on our AVC platform. We’re in multiple discussions, I think, that will provide great validation for the program, maybe on more than one of the platform programs: influenza, RSV, HIV, coronavirus, for example,” he said. “You always try to time those things to coincide with JP Morgan…all I should say is that we’re hopeful that next year will be an important year for the AVC program.”

 

The DNA Vaccine Comes to COVID-19

This next one is 100 percent a prophylactic but in the lesser-known category of the DNA vaccine. Like Cidara, OncoSec Medical Inc. is developing immunotherapy cancer treatments using its plasmid DNA delivery platform. Now, the company is leveraging the power of oncology R&D to develop a first-in-class DNA vaccine for COVID-19.

Distinct from vaccines that use recombinant bacteria or viruses, genetic vaccines are made up entirely of DNA (as plasmids or RNA (as mRNA), which is then taken up by the cells and converted into protein.

OncoSec’s vaccine, CORVax12, being developed in partnership with Providence Cancer Center in Portland, uses a DNA-encodable stabilized trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein developed in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) laboratories similar to the one used in the newly approved Moderna vaccine. It is being created with a proprietary mixture consisting of Interleukin 12s (IL-12’s).

“IL12 is organized to stimulate a different aspect of the immune response called the cellular immune response, with the spike protein stimulating the humoral immune response. With IL12, you’re stimulating the cellular immune response. So we think together, those two things can create a vaccine that is potentially stronger than the vaccines that have been in development for the general population,” said Daniel O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer and Director of OncoSec.

 O’Connor further explained: “IL12 is a cytokine, and cytokines are basically chemical signalers of immune response, and IL12 itself signals a pro-inflammatory immune response, which signals what immunologists would call a cellular immune response.”

The NIH provided the DNA portion of the glycoprotein (spike protein) in a non-exclusive license to OncoSec in order for the company to further explore the potential when it is combined with  IL12.

The FDA approved the Investigational New Drug (IND) application for CORVax12 on October 29th.  According to O’Connor, Providence will begin a Phase I, open-label study evaluating the vaccine’s safety and immunogenicity “very soon”.

Alongside this clinical research, Providence will be running an immune monitoring program.

“Our hope is that the immune monitoring program starts to better inform the role of IL12 alongside a traditional vaccination approach,” said O’Connor.

Combating Drug-Resistant Bacteria

With companies like Cidara and OncoSec working to develop injectable vaccines and therapeutics for viral infections, someone needs to tackle the global crisis caused by bacterial infections. Enter Recce Pharmaceuticals Ltda biotech from down-under aiming to drive superbugs back under with synthetic polymer-based anti-infectives.

Recce is a world leader in the new drug class and is commercializing a novel synthetic broad-spectrum antibiotic designed to overcome antimicrobial resistance. The company’s two primary drug candidates are RECCE® 327 against bacterial infections and RECCE® 529, a new synthetic polymer formulation for viral ones such as COVID-19.

RECCE® 327 has shown substantial efficacy against a broad range of bacterias.

“When we look to antibiotics, all of them to date have been predominantly from natural sources. You’re only as good as what’s found in nature. You’re as good as what’s given. You get some good things, you get some bad things, and there’s often bad toxicity, or singular mechanisms of action or long cultivation of action, or long cultivation processes, low-yield. We eliminate that,” said Recce Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, James Graham. “With our technology, we have achieved fantastic capability against the full escaped pathogen suite of bacteria. There’s never been a bacteria we haven’t been able to kill. But most importantly and fundamentally different, keep on killing with repeated use. That’s something that the world needs, and that’s exactly what our drug’s about.”

Throughout his career, Recce Founder and biotech veteran, Dr. Graham Melrose, has gone all-in on combating Antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Graham, his grandson, explained the method and rationale behind Melrose’s scientific thinking:

“The company is founded upon a unique anti-infective technology, that is a synthetic polymer technology that’s soluble across all PHs of the blood. He [Melrose] went, “I want these exact monomers which are the singular particles that come together to create the polymer with desired characteristics. Really, those desired characteristics are attraction and bonding to the proteins of bacteria into reaction with the cellular structures of those bacteria, regardless of….biofilms, and into reaction no matter of mutated space,” said Graham. “The world of singular mechanisms of action is long behind us. These cells are mutating so quickly and we may need new drugs to combat that.”

With the decline in antibiotic research due to their poor market routines, the initiative, Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (CARB-X), spearheaded by Boston University and funded by, among others, the US Department of Health and Human Services Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), is accelerating R&D in the field, citing the mounting global threat of drug resistant bacteria.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 700 thousand people die each year from bacterial infections, with more than 35,000 perishing in the U.S. from antibiotic-resistant infections per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

“The world urgently needs new antibiotics, vaccines, diagnostics and other products to help fight the rise of drug resistant bacteria. If we fail to solve this problem, many advances of modern medicine that depend on fighting infection with antibiotics – routine surgery, cancer therapy, treatment of chronic diseases – may be jeopardized,” states CARB-X, whose participants include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“On the coronavirus side, the world is naturally very concerned about the virus itself,” said Graham. “There are also people dying not from the virus, but from the terrible bacterial infections, whether it be pneumonia or other that follows becoming septic. So that whole infectious disease profile that we happen to find ourselves in, is one that we’re rapidly pursuing at this moment.”

https://www.biospace.com/article/-new-and-emerging-drug-classes-that-will-outlast-the-pandemic/

U.S. distributes over 13.07M doses of COVID-19 vaccines; 4.2M administered - CDC

 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it had administered 4,225,756 first doses of COVID-19 vaccines in the country as of Saturday morning and distributed 13,071,925 doses.

The tally of vaccine doses distributed and the number of people who received the first dose are for both Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech, vaccines as of 9:00 a.m. ET on Saturday, the agency said.

According to the tally posted on Dec. 30, the agency had administered 2,794,588 first doses of the vaccines and distributed 12,409,050 doses.

A total of 2,217,025 vaccine doses were distributed for use on long-term care facilities and 282,740 people in the facilities got their first dose, the agency said.

The agency also reported 20,061,818 cases of new coronavirus, an increase of 168,637 cases from its previous count, and said that the number of deaths had risen by 2,428 to 346,925.

The CDC reported its tally of cases of the respiratory illness known as COVID-19, caused by a new coronavirus, as of 4 pm ET Friday versus its previous report published on Dec. 31.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/MODERNA-INC-47437573/news/Moderna-U-S-distributes-over-13-07-mln-doses-of-COVID-19-vaccines-4-2-mln-administered-CDC-32110586/

COVID-19 severity affected by proportion of antibodies targeting crucial viral protein

 COVID-19 antibodies preferentially target a different part of the virus in mild cases of COVID-19 than they do in severe cases, and wane significantly within several months of infection, according to a new study by researchers at Stanford Medicine.

The findings identify new links between the course of the disease and a patient's immune response. They also raise concerns about whether people can be re-infected, whether antibody tests to detect prior infection may underestimate the breadth of the pandemic and whether vaccinations may need to be repeated at regular intervals to maintain a protective immune response.

"This is one of the most comprehensive studies to date of the antibody immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in people across the entire spectrum of disease severity, from asymptomatic to fatal," said Scott Boyd, MD, PhD, associate professor of pathology. "We assessed multiple time points and sample types, and also analyzed levels of viral RNA in patient nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples. It's one of the first big-picture looks at this illness."

The study found that people with severe COVID-19 have low proportions of antibodies targeting the spike protein used by the virus to enter human cells compared with the number of antibodies targeting proteins of the virus's inner shell.

Boyd is a senior author of the study, which was published Dec. 7 in Science Immunology. Other senior authors are Benjamin Pinsky, MD, PhD, associate professor of pathology, and Peter Kim, PhD, the Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Professor of Biochemistry. The lead authors are research scientist Katharina Röltgen, PhD; postdoctoral scholars Abigail Powell, PhD, and Oliver Wirz, PhD; and clinical instructor Bryan Stevens, MD.

Virus binds to ACE2 receptor

The researchers studied 254 people with asymptomatic, mild or severe COVID-19 who were identified either through routine testing or occupational health screening at Stanford Health Care or who came to a Stanford Health Care clinic with symptoms of COVID-19. Of the people with symptoms, 25 were treated as outpatients, 42 were hospitalized outside the intensive care unit and 37 were treated in the intensive care unit. Twenty-five people in the study died of the disease.

SARS-CoV-2 binds to human cells via a structure on its surface called the spike protein. This protein binds to a receptor on human cells called ACE2. The binding allows the virus to enter and infect the cell. Once inside, the virus sheds its outer coat to reveal an inner shell encasing its genetic material. Soon, the virus co-opts the cell's protein-making machinery to churn out more viral particles, which are then released to infect other cells.

Antibodies that recognize and bind to the spike protein block its ability to bind to ACE2, preventing the virus from infecting the cells, whereas antibodies that recognize other viral components are unlikely to prevent viral spread. Current vaccine candidates use portions of the spike protein to stimulate an immune response.

Boyd and his colleagues analyzed the levels of three types of antibodies -- IgG, IgM and IgA -- and the proportions that targeted the viral spike protein or the virus's inner shell as the disease progressed and patients either recovered or grew sicker. They also measured the levels of viral genetic material in nasopharyngeal samples and blood from the patients. Finally, they assessed the effectiveness of the antibodies in preventing the spike protein from binding to ACE2 in a laboratory dish.

"Although previous studies have assessed the overall antibody response to infection, we compared the viral proteins targeted by these antibodies," Boyd said. "We found that the severity of the illness correlates with the ratio of antibodies recognizing domains of the spike protein compared with other nonprotective viral targets. Those people with mild illness tended to have a higher proportion of anti-spike antibodies, and those who died from their disease had more antibodies that recognized other parts of the virus."

Substantial variability in immune response

The researchers caution, however, that although the study identified trends among a group of patients, there is still substantial variability in the immune response mounted by individual patients, particularly those with severe disease.

"Antibody responses are not likely to be the sole determinant of someone's outcome," Boyd said. "Among people with severe disease, some die and some recover. Some of these patients mount a vigorous immune response, and others have a more moderate response. So, there are a lot of other things going on. There are also other branches of the immune system involved. It's important to note that our results identify correlations but don't prove causation."

As in other studies, the researchers found that people with asymptomatic and mild illness had lower levels of antibodies overall than did those with severe disease. After recovery, the levels of IgM and IgA decreased steadily to low or undetectable levels in most patients over a period of about one to four months after symptom onset or estimated infection date, and IgG levels dropped significantly.

"This is quite consistent with what has been seen with other coronaviruses that regularly circulate in our communities to cause the common cold," Boyd said. "It's not uncommon for someone to get re-infected within a year or sometimes sooner. It remains to be seen whether the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is stronger, or persists longer, than that caused by natural infection. It's quite possible it could be better. But there are a lot of questions that still need to be answered."

Boyd is a co-chair of the National Cancer Institute's SeroNet Serological Sciences Network, one of the nation's largest coordinated research efforts to study the immune response to COVID-19. He is the principal investigator of Center of Excellence in SeroNet at Stanford, which is tackling critical questions about the mechanisms and duration of immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

"For example, if someone has already been infected, should they get the vaccine? If so, how should they be prioritized?" Boyd said. "How can we adapt seroprevalence studies in vaccinated populations? How will immunity from vaccination differ from that caused by natural infection? And how long might a vaccine be protective? These are all very interesting, important questions."

###

Other Stanford co-authors of the study are visiting pathology instructor Catherine Hogan, MD; postdoctoral scholars Javaria Najeeb, PhD, and Ana Otrelo-Cardoso, PhD; medical resident Hannah Wang, MD; research scientist Malaya Sahoo, PhD; research professional ChunHong Huang, PhD; research scientist Fumiko Yamamoto; laboratory director Monali Manohar, PhD; senior clinical laboratory scientist Justin Manalac; Tho Pham, MD, clinical assistant professor of pathology; medical fellow Arjun Rustagi, MD, PhD; Angela Rogers, MD, assistant professor of medicine; Nigam Shah, PhD, professor of medicine; Catherine Blish, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine; Jennifer Cochran, PhD, chair and professor of bioengineering; Theodore Jardetzky, PhD, professor of structural biology; James Zehnder, MD, professor of pathology and of medicine; Taia Wang, MD, PhD, assistant professor of medicine and of microbiology and immunology; senior research scientist Balasubramanian Narasimhan, PhD; pathology instructor Saurabh Gombar, MD, PhD; Robert Tibshirani, PhD, professor of biomedical data science and of statistics; and Kari Nadeau, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and of pediatrics.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants RO1AI127877, RO1AI130398, 1U54CA260517, T32AI007502-23, U19AI111825 and UL1TR003142), the Crown Family Foundation, the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and a Coulter COVID-19 Rapid Response award.

Boyd, Röltgen, Kim and Powell have filed provisional patent applications related to serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-12/sm-csa122320.php